Assessment of Hormone Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status in Breast Carcinoma Using Thin-Prep Cytology Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology FISH Experience From China

Principles of Analytic Validation of Immunohistochemical Assays: Guideline Update

CONTEXT.—

In 2014, the College of American Pathologists developed an evidence-based guideline to address analytic validation of immunohistochemical assays. Fourteen recommendations were offered. Per the National Academy of Medicine standards for developing trustworthy guidelines, guidelines should be updated when new evidence suggests modifications.

OBJECTIVE.—

To assess evidence published since the release of the original guideline and develop updated evidence-based recommendations.

DESIGN.—

The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and update the original guideline recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS.—

Two strong recommendations, 1 conditional recommendation, and 12 good practice statements are offered in this updated guideline. They address analytic validation or verification of predictive and nonpredictive assays, and recommended revalidation procedures following changes in assay conditions.

CONCLUSIONS.—

While many of the original guideline statements remain similar, new recommendations address analytic validation of assays with distinct scoring systems, such as programmed death receptor-1 and analytic verification of US Food and Drug Administration approved/cleared assays; more specific guidance is offered for validating immunohistochemistry performed on cytology specimens.

The detection of PD-L1 expression on liquid-based cytology in pleural effusion of lung adenocarcinoma and its prognostic evaluation: Between paired liquid-based cytology and cell block samples

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels measured by immunohistochemistry have been proven to predict the outcome of immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, data on PD-L1 expression on liquid-based cytology (LBC) in malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is scarce.

METHODS

This study cohort included 60 cases with MPE suffering from LUAD. PD-L1 SP263 assay was used for immunocytochemistry (ICC) on LBC and matched cell block (CB) to validate ICC protocols on LBC slides. Clinical outcomes were analyzed based on immunotherapy and PD-L1 tumor proportion scores (TPS) on LBC slides and CBs.

RESULTS

PD-L1 expression with TPS ≥1% was lower in LBCs than in CBs (33 of 60 [55.0%] vs. 35 of 60 [58.3%]; p = .687). Even with the TPS ≥50% threshold, PD-L1 expression was lower in LBCs (10 of 60 [16.7%] vs. 15 of 60 [25%]; p = .125). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 mutation, tumor cell proportion, and pleural fluid neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were related to PD-L1 expression on CBs (p = .013, p = 0.022, and p = .011), respectively. Patients with subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy remained a better prognostic in subgroups of PD-L1 positive expression on LBC slides (TPS ≥1%, p = .041).

CONCLUSIONS

LBC specimens had comparable performance to CBs in PD-L1 assessment and predicting treatment response to PD-L1-defined therapy.

Oncogenic gene transcripts detection by FISH on liquid-based cytology slides of 338 advanced lung cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Oncogenic gene transcripts in advanced lung cancer are a strong indication for targeted therapy. Cytology specimens are often the only materials available for oncogenic fusion analysis. This prospective study is to evaluate the feasibility of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements, ROS oncogene 1 (ROS-1), and c-mesenchymal-epidermal transformation (c-MET) detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using liquid-based cytology (LBC) slides.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive cytology specimens including fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and serous effusions from 338 advanced lung cancer patients were collected between March 1, 2015, and July 6, 2016. The correlation between ALK, ROS-1, c-MET, and other common driver gene abnormalities and the therapeutic response to crizotinib in ALK-positive patients were also evaluated.

RESULTS

ALK fusion transcripts were detected in 31 of 338 patients (9.17%). Twenty-two of the 31 ALK-positive patients were treated with crizotinib at our institution (2 were lost to follow-up), and the overall response rate was 75.0 % (15 of 20); disease control rate was 90.0% (18 of 20). FISH analyses for ROS-1 and c-MET were performed on 75 and 73 patients, respectively, and showed 3 patients positive for ROS-1 and 3 positive for c-MET. These positive cases were all ALK-negative.

CONCLUSION

For patients with advanced lung cancer, LBC slides are suitable for detecting oncogenic gene transcripts, and the results can provide a reliable guideline for targeted therapy.

Hormone Receptors and Human Epidermal Growth Factor (HER2) Expression in Fine-Needle Aspirates from Metastatic Breast Carcinoma - Role in Patient Management

Introduction:

Estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and epidermal growth factor (HER2) are prognostic and predictive factors for breast carcinoma. We determined them by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on cell blocks from fine-needle aspirates (FNA) of metastatic breast carcinoma to axillary lymphnodes and compared them with that reported in the primary breast carcinoma (PBC) to document any change in their expression for future management.

Materials and Methods:

ER, PR, and HER2 by IHC and HER2 oncogene by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) were studied on cell blocks of FNA of axillary lymphnodes in 53 of 94 PBC cases from 2012 to 2016.

Results:

In 25 of 38 (65.8%) ER, PR negative PBC the metastasis on FNA was ER, PR+, whereas the 15 (28.3%) ER, PRPBC remained negative. In 10 of 11 (91%) of HER2-IHC+, PBC the metastatic tumor was HER2-IHC+. 7 of 32 (21.9%) HER2-IHC negative PBC were HER2-IHC+ in metastatic tumor. HER2-FISH was performed in 37 cases on FNA. Six of 37 were HER2 amplified/positive, whereas 9 and 19 remained equivocal and negative for HER2 copy number, and 3 were not interpretable. All the 6 HER2-FISH+ cases were positive by IHC. In our study, 34.2% of ER, PR+ cases of PBC became ER, PR– in the metastatic tumor and 21.9% of HER2-IHC negative PBC became HER2-IHC+ in the metastatic aspirate.

Conclusion:

ER, PR, and HER2 by IHC in cell blocks of metastatic lymphnodes are reliable. Change in receptor (34.2%) and HER2 status (21.9%) was documented, which is of clinical significance as these patients warrant a change of management.

Immunocytochemistry using Liquid-based Cytology: A Tool in Hormone Receptor Analysis of Breast Cancer

Context:

Efficacy of immunocytochemistry (ICC) in determining molecular biomarkers like estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptors (PRs), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2).

Aims:

To evaluate biomarkers using ICC in breast cancer as per American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathology (ASCO/CAP) guidelines.

Settings and Design:

The study was conducted over a period of 2 years from September 2012 to August 2014 and is the first such study in eastern India.

Materials and Methods:

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was done for suspected cases of breast cancers and slides were prepared using ThinPrep (TP) technology of liquid-based cytology (LBC) for ICC and corresponding biopsy specimens were processed as formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) sections for comparison. Both the LBC slides and tissue sections were subjected to immunostaining for ER, PR, and HER2. ICC was evaluated by Allred Scoring and IHC by Quick Scoring.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Statistical analysis done by Wilconxon Signed rank test on the SPSS program, Chicago, Illinois, USA. The results of ICC and IHC were compared by evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, kappa-value (k-value), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results:

The comparison of ICC with immunohistochemistry (IHC), ER, and PR showed very good correspondence rate, sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and agreement with k-value; whereas for HER2 the results were only good.

Conclusion:

ICC using LBC can be a useful tool in assessing biomarkers in advanced cases of breast cancer where surgery is not possible or cases where ASCO/CAP guidelines for management are not followed.

Reliability of Estrogen Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression on Breast Cancer Cells Stored in Cellprep® Vials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression levels in Cellprep® (CP).

STUDY DESIGN

We evaluated the stability of immunocytochemistry (ICC) of ER and HER2 for primary or recurrent breast cancer samples rinsed in CP vials. Samples were prepared from CP vials stored for 1-30 or 160-240 days. ER and HER2 statuses were determined after 1-30 days (26 and 25 tests, respectively) or 160-240 days (15 and 18 tests, respectively) with the same protocols as immunohistochemistry (IHC), and were compared with the corresponding surgically resected specimens.

RESULTS

ER statuses according to CP samples showed perfect agreement (1-30 days: kappa, κ = 1; 160-240 days: κ = 1). HER2 statuses also showed good agreement (1-30 days: κ = 0.79; 160-240 days: κ = 0.64), although there were more equivocal HER2 cases in CP than in the surgically resected specimens.

CONCLUSION

ER ICC in CP vials is reliable regardless of the preservation period. HER2 ICC in CP has more equivocal cases than HER2 IHC in surgically resected specimens. Both improvement of the immunostaining protocol and further validation study of in situ hybridization are indispensable for the practical application of ICC in CP.

The Assessment of Estrogen Receptor Status and Its Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Patients With Breast Cancer by Using 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical value of F-fluoroestradiol (F-FES) PET/CT in the assessment of the estrogen receptor (ER) and its intratumoral heterogeneity in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Forty-six female patients (50 lesions) with histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer who underwent both F-FES and F-FDG PET/CT in our center were retrospectively included. All the patients enrolled were scheduled to undergo biopsy. The F-FES and FDG uptakes were compared with pathological features (tumor size, ER, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and Ki67%). The optimal threshold to discriminate ER-positive and ER-negative lesions was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Furthermore, we observed the intratumoral heterogeneity by a heterogeneity index (SUVmax/SUVmean) and compared the results with the Chang-Gung Image Texture Analysis.

RESULTS

There was good agreement between F-FES uptake and ER, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression (P < 0.001), and the use of SUVmean instead of SUVmax can provide a slightly better correlation. The optimal threshold for F-FES PET/CT to discriminate between ER-positive and ER-negative lesions, as determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, was an SUVmax of 1.82 (sensitivity = 88.2% and specificity = 87.5%) and SUVmean of 1.21 (sensitivity = 85.3% and specificity = 93.7). Our simplified heterogeneity index-FES can easily observe ER heterogeneity. In addition, our results suggested that recurrent/metastatic patients and lesions located other than breast might have greater heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

F-FES PET/CT is a feasible, noninvasive method for assessing ER expression in breast cancer patients. Because intratumoral heterogeneity exists, F-FES PET/CT might better reflect the ER expression, especially in metastatic patients after treatment, thus assisting in making individualized treatment decisions.

HER2 Testing and Clinical Decision Making in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Context ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 or HER2) is currently the only biomarker established for selection of a specific therapy for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). However, there are no comprehensive guidelines for the assessment of HER2 in patients with GEA. Objectives To establish an evidence-based guideline for HER2 testing in patients with GEA, formalize the algorithms for methods to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing while addressing which patients and tumor specimens are appropriate, and to provide guidance on clinical decision making. Design The College of American Pathologists (CAP), American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature to develop an evidence-based guideline with recommendations for optimal HER2 testing in patients with GEA. Results The Panel is proposing 11 recommendations with strong agreement from the open comment participants. Recommendations The Panel recommends that tumor specimen(s) from all patients with advanced GEA, who are candidates for HER2-targeted therapy, should be assessed for HER2 status before the initiation of HER2-targeted therapy. Clinicians should offer combination chemotherapy and an HER2-targeted agent as initial therapy for all patients with HER2-positive advanced GEA. For pathologists, guidance is provided for morphologic selection of neoplastic tissue, testing algorithms, scoring methods, interpretation and reporting of results, and laboratory quality assurance. Conclusion This guideline provides specific recommendations for assessment of HER2 in patients with advanced GEA while addressing pertinent technical issues and clinical implications of the results.

Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy and Excision Specimens for the Accurate Evaluation of Breast Cancer Molecular Markers: a Report of 1003 Cases

In this study, we compared the accuracy of marker evaluation in core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens versus excision specimens (ESs) from breast cancer patients. This retrospective study used data collected from the breast cancer database at the West China Hospital, China. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) results from CNB specimens and ESs were compared, using estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67 as markers. Molecular subtyping and endocrine therapy usage correlations based on CNB samples and ESs were evaluated. The results obtained from CNB samples and ESs exhibited substantial agreement for the detection of ER (κ = 0.522), PR (κ = 0.441), and HER2 (κ = 0.451), and also influenced endocrine therapy usage. Fair and poor correlations were observed for Ki-67 staining and molecular subtyping (κ = 0.195), respectively. This disagreement might be attributable to a combination of heterogeneity and large tumor size. This study indicates that the discordance rate in molecular marker staining between CNB specimens and ESs is significant enough that results obtained with CNB specimens should be used cautiously or verified using ESs.

HER2 Testing and Clinical Decision Making in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology

CONTEXT

- ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 or HER2) is currently the only biomarker established for selection of a specific therapy for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). However, there are no comprehensive guidelines for the assessment of HER2 in patients with GEA.

OBJECTIVES

- To establish an evidence-based guideline for HER2 testing in patients with GEA, to formalize the algorithms for methods to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing while addressing which patients and tumor specimens are appropriate, and to provide guidance on clinical decision making.

DESIGN

- The College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature to develop an evidence-based guideline with recommendations for optimal HER2 testing in patients with GEA.

RESULTS

- The panel is proposing 11 recommendations with strong agreement from the open-comment participants.

RECOMMENDATIONS

- The panel recommends that tumor specimen(s) from all patients with advanced GEA, who are candidates for HER2-targeted therapy, should be assessed for HER2 status before the initiation of HER2-targeted therapy. Clinicians should offer combination chemotherapy and a HER2-targeted agent as initial therapy for all patients with HER2-positive advanced GEA. For pathologists, guidance is provided for morphologic selection of neoplastic tissue, testing algorithms, scoring methods, interpretation and reporting of results, and laboratory quality assurance.

CONCLUSIONS

- This guideline provides specific recommendations for assessment of HER2 in patients with advanced GEA while addressing pertinent technical issues and clinical implications of the results.

HER2 Testing and Clinical Decision Making in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology

CONTEXT

ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 or HER2) is currently the only biomarker established for selection of a specific therapy for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). However, there are no comprehensive guidelines for the assessment of HER2 in patients with GEA.

OBJECTIVES

To establish an evidence-based guideline for HER2 testing in patients with GEA, to formalize the algorithms for methods to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing while addressing which patients and tumor specimens are appropriate, and to provide guidance on clinical decision making.

DESIGN

The College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature to develop an evidence-based guideline with recommendations for optimal HER2 testing in patients with GEA.

RESULTS

The panel is proposing 11 recommendations with strong agreement from the open-comment participants.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The panel recommends that tumor specimen(s) from all patients with advanced GEA, who are candidates for HER2-targeted therapy, should be assessed for HER2 status before the initiation of HER2-targeted therapy. Clinicians should offer combination chemotherapy and a HER2-targeted agent as initial therapy for all patients with HER2-positive advanced GEA. For pathologists, guidance is provided for morphologic selection of neoplastic tissue, testing algorithms, scoring methods, interpretation and reporting of results, and laboratory quality assurance.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline provides specific recommendations for assessment of HER2 in patients with advanced GEA while addressing pertinent technical issues and clinical implications of the results.

Correlation of Expression of Breast Biomarkers in Primary and Metastatic Breast Carcinomas: A Single-Institution Experience

OBJECTIVE

Changes in the status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in metastatic breast carcinomas are frequently reported. We examined the change in the status of biomarkers in metastatic breast carcinomas.

STUDY DESIGN

This study cohort was composed of 137 metastatic breast carcinomas (58 surgical and 79 cytological specimens) with existing primary tumors during a study period from 2013 to 2015.

RESULTS

The overall change rates in metastases were 9, 21 and 6% for ER, PR and HER2, respectively. All changes were from positive in the primary tumor to negative in the metastases. The ER change rate was significantly higher in the cytological than in the surgical metastases. Six of 14 cytological metastases with positive HER2 in primary tumors showed a change in HER2 status, including 5 fluid specimens and 1 fine-needle aspiration (FNA); the other 8 had no change in HER2 status, and included 7 FNAs and 1 fluid specimen.

CONCLUSION

The significant percentage of cases with a change in biomarker status supports the recommendation by the College of American Pathologists to test breast biomarkers in metastases. HER2 status change was mostly identified in fluid specimens; however, the small sample size in our cohort and the fact that HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization was not performed may warrant further studies.

Usefulness of conventional transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis, staging and molecular characterization of pulmonary neoplasias by thin-prep based cytology: experience of a single oncological institute

BACKGROUND

Conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (c-TBNA) contributed to improve the bronchoscopic examination, allowing to sample lesions located even outside the tracheo-bronchial tree and in the hilo-mediastinal district, both for diagnostic and staging purposes.

METHODS

We have evaluated the sensitivity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the c-TBNA performed during the 2005-2015 period for suspicious lung neoplasia and/or hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy at the Thoracic endoscopy of the Thoracic Surgery Department of the Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome. Data from 273 consecutive patients (205 males and 68 females) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 158 (58%) adequate specimens, 112 (41%) were neoplastic or contained atypical cells, 46 (17%) were negative or not diagnostic. We considered in the analysis first the overall period; then we compared the findings of the first [2005-2011] and second period [2012-2015] and, finally, only those of adequate specimens. During the overall period, sensibility and accuracy values were respectively of 53% and 63%, in the first period they reached 41% and 53% respectively; in the second period sensibility and accuracy reached 60% and 68%. Considering only the adequate specimens, sensibility and accuracy during the overall period were respectively of 80% and 82%; the values obtained for the first period were 68% and 72%. Finally, in the second period, sensibility reached 86% and accuracy 89%. Carcinoma-subtyping was possible in 112 cases, adenocarcinomas being diagnosed in 50 cases; further, in 30 cases molecular predictive data could be obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

The c-TBNA proved to be an efficient method for the diagnosis/staging of lung neoplasms and for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Endoscopist's skill and technical development, associated to thin-prep cytology and to a rapid on site examination (ROSE), were able to provide by c-TBNA a high diagnostic yield and molecular predictive data in advanced lung carcinomas.