1
|
Honda M, Sigmund EE, Le Bihan D, Pinker K, Clauser P, Karampinos D, Partridge SC, Fallenberg E, Martincich L, Baltzer P, Mann RM, Camps-Herrero J, Iima M. Advanced breast diffusion-weighted imaging: what are the next steps? A proposal from the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-weighted Imaging working group. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-11010-0. [PMID: 39379708 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11010-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study by the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI) working group aimed to evaluate the current and future applications of advanced DWI in breast imaging. METHODS A literature search and a comprehensive survey of EUSOBI members to explore the clinical use and potential of advanced DWI techniques and a literature search were involved. Advanced DWI approaches such as intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) were assessed for their current status and challenges in clinical implementation. RESULTS Although a literature search revealed an increasing number of publications and growing academic interest in advanced DWI, the survey revealed limited adoption of advanced DWI techniques among EUSOBI members, with 32% using IVIM models, 17% using non-Gaussian diffusion techniques for kurtosis analysis, and only 8% using DTI. A variety of DWI techniques are used, with IVIM being the most popular, but less than half use it, suggesting that the study identified a gap between the potential benefits of advanced DWI and its actual use in clinical practice. CONCLUSION The findings highlight the need for further research, standardization and simplification to transition advanced DWI from a research tool to regular practice in breast imaging. The study concludes with guidelines and recommendations for future research directions and clinical implementation, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in this field to improve breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Advanced DWI in breast imaging, while currently in limited clinical use, offers promising improvements in diagnosis, staging, and treatment monitoring, highlighting the need for standardized protocols, accessible software, and collaborative approaches to promote its broader integration into routine clinical practice. KEY POINTS Increasing number of publications on advanced DWI over the last decade indicates growing research interest. EUSOBI survey shows that advanced DWI is used primarily in research, not extensively in clinical practice. More research and standardization are needed to integrate advanced DWI into routine breast imaging practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Honda
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kansai Electric Power Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Eric E Sigmund
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 6, 60 1st Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Denis Le Bihan
- NeuroSpin/Joliot, CEA-Saclay Center, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- Human Brain Research Center, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Katja Pinker
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Division, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Structural Preclinical Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna General Hospital, Wien, Austria
| | - Dimitrios Karampinos
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Savannah C Partridge
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Eva Fallenberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Laura Martincich
- Unit of Radiodiagnostics, Ospedale Cardinal G. Massaia -ASL AT, Via Conte Verde 125, 14100, Asti, Italy
| | - Pascal Baltzer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Mami Iima
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
- Department of Fundamental Development for Advanced Low Invasive Diagnostic Imaging, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Almutlaq ZM, Bacon SE, Wilson DJ, Sharma N, Dondo T, Buckley DL. The relationship between parameters measured using intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a longitudinal cohort study. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1356173. [PMID: 38860001 PMCID: PMC11163445 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1356173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The primary aim of this study was to explore whether intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) can offer a contrast-agent-free alternative to dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI for measuring breast tumor perfusion. The secondary aim was to investigate the relationship between tissue diffusion measures from DWI and DCE-MRI measures of the tissue interstitial and extracellular volume fractions. Materials and methods A total of 108 paired DWI and DCE-MRI scans were acquired at 1.5 T from 40 patients with primary breast cancer (median age: 44.5 years) before and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). DWI parameters included apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), tissue diffusion (Dt), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (Dp), perfused fraction (f), and the product f×Dp (microvascular blood flow). DCE-MRI parameters included blood flow (Fb), blood volume fraction (vb), interstitial volume fraction (ve) and extracellular volume fraction (vd). All were extracted from three tumor regions of interest (whole-tumor, ADC cold-spot, and DCE-MRI hot-spot) at three MRI visits: pre-treatment, after one, and three cycles of NACT. Spearman's rank correlation was used for assessing between-subject correlations (r), while repeated measures correlation was employed to assess within-subject correlations (rrm) across visits between DWI and DCE-MRI parameters in each region. Results No statistically significant between-subject or within-subject correlation was found between the perfusion parameters estimated by IVIM and DCE-MRI (f versus vb and f×Dp versus Fb; P=0.07-0.81). Significant moderate positive between-subject and within-subject correlations were observed between ADC and ve (r=0.461, rrm=0.597) and between Dt and ve (r=0.405, rrm=0.514) as well as moderate positive within-subject correlations between ADC and vd and between Dt and vd (rrm=0.619 and 0.564, respectively) in the whole-tumor region. Conclusion No correlations were observed between the perfusion parameters estimated by IVIM and DCE-MRI. This may be attributed to imprecise estimates of fxDp and vb, or an underlying difference in what IVIM and DCE-MRI measure. Care should be taken when interpreting the IVIM parameters (f and f×Dp) as surrogates for those measured using DCE-MRI. However, the moderate positive correlations found between ADC and Dt and the DCE-MRI parameters ve and vd confirms the expectation that as the interstitial and extracellular volume fractions increase, water diffusion increases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zyad M. Almutlaq
- Biomedical Imaging, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Radiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sarah E. Bacon
- Department of Medical Physics & Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel J. Wilson
- Department of Medical Physics & Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Nisha Sharma
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Tatendashe Dondo
- Clinical and Population Sciences Department, LICAMM, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - David L. Buckley
- Biomedical Imaging, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cheung SM, Wu WS, Senn N, Sharma R, McGoldrick T, Gagliardi T, Husain E, Masannat Y, He J. Towards detection of early response in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer using Bayesian intravoxel incoherent motion. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1277556. [PMID: 38125950 PMCID: PMC10731248 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1277556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The early identification of good responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) holds a significant potential in the optimal treatment of breast cancer. A recent Bayesian approach has been postulated to improve the accuracy of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model for clinical translation. This study examined the prediction and early sensitivity of Bayesian IVIM to NACT response. Materials and methods Seventeen female patients with breast cancer were scanned at baseline and 16 patients were scanned after Cycle 1. Tissue diffusion and perfusion from Bayesian IVIM were calculated at baseline with percentage change at Cycle 1 computed with reference to baseline. Cellular proliferative activity marker Ki-67 was obtained semi-quantitatively with percentage change at excision computed with reference to core biopsy. Results The perfusion fraction showed a significant difference (p = 0.042) in percentage change between responder groups at Cycle 1, with a decrease in good responders [-7.98% (-19.47-1.73), n = 7] and an increase in poor responders [10.04% (5.09-28.93), n = 9]. There was a significant correlation between percentage change in perfusion fraction and percentage change in Ki-67 (p = 0.042). Tissue diffusion and pseudodiffusion showed no significant difference in percentage change between groups at Cycle 1, nor was there a significant correlation against percentage change in Ki-67. Perfusion fraction, tissue diffusion, and pseudodiffusion showed no significant difference between groups at baseline, nor was there a significant correlation against Ki-67 from core biopsy. Conclusion The alteration in tumour perfusion fraction from the Bayesian IVIM model, in association with cellular proliferation, showed early sensitivity to good responders in NACT. Clinical trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03501394, identifier NCT03501394.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Man Cheung
- Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Wing-Shan Wu
- Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Senn
- Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Ravi Sharma
- Department of Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Trevor McGoldrick
- Department of Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Tanja Gagliardi
- Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ehab Husain
- Department of Pathology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Yazan Masannat
- Breast Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Jiabao He
- Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yao FF, Zhang Y. A review of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging for breast cancer: Towards noninvasive biomarker. Clin Imaging 2023; 98:36-58. [PMID: 36996598 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is an important adjunct to conventional breast MRI and shows promise as a noninvasive biomarker of breast cancer in multiple clinical scenarios, from the discrimination of benign and malignant lesions, prediction, and evaluation of treatment response to a prognostic assessment of breast cancer. Various quantitative parameters are derived from different DWI models based on special prior knowledge and assumptions, have different meanings, and are easy to confuse. In this review, we describe the quantitative parameters derived from conventional and advanced DWI models commonly used in breast cancer and summarize the promising clinical applications of these quantitative parameters. Although promising, it is still challenging for these quantitative parameters to become clinically useful noninvasive biomarkers in breast cancer, as multiple factors may result in variations in quantitative parameter measurements. Finally, we briefly describe some considerations regarding the factors that cause variations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei-Fei Yao
- Department of MRI in the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of MRI in the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang H, Lu Y, Li Y, Li S, Zhang X, Geng C. Nomogram for Early Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Combining Both Clinicopathological and Imaging Indicators. Curr Probl Cancer 2022; 46:100914. [PMID: 36351312 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2022.100914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
To construct a nomogram for early prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). A total of 257 patients with BC from the fourth hospital of Hebei Medical University were included in the study. The patients were divided into training (n = 128) and validation groups (n = 129). Variables were screened using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and the nomogram model was set up based on the training group. The training and validation groups were validated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots. The diagnostic value of the nomogram was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). Indicators such as hormone receptor status, clinical TNM stage, and change rate in apparent diffusion coefficient of breast magnetic resonance imaging after two NAC cycles were used for nomogram construction. The calibration plots showed high consistency between nomogram-predicted and actual pCR probabilities in the training and validation groups. The areas under the curve of the ROC curve with discrimination ability were 0.942 and 0.921 in the training and validation groups, respectively. This showed an excellent discrimination ability of our nomogram for pCR prediction. Further, DCA showed favorable diagnostic value in our model. The nomogram may be instructive to clinicians for early prediction of pCR and helpful to adjust the treatment program on time in neoadjuvant management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoqi Wang
- Breast Disease Diagnostic and Therapeutic Center, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Yuyang Lu
- Thyroid and Breast Department, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China
| | - Yilun Li
- Breast Disease Diagnostic and Therapeutic Center, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Sainan Li
- Breast Disease Diagnostic and Therapeutic Center, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Xi Zhang
- Breast Disease Diagnostic and Therapeutic Center, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Cuizhi Geng
- Breast Disease Diagnostic and Therapeutic Center, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sahib MA, Arvin A, Ahmadinejad N, Bustan RA, Dakhil HA. Assessment of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for differential diagnosis of breast lesions and evaluation of response: a systematic review. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-022-00770-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The current study aimed to assess the performance for quantitative differentiation and evaluation of response in categorized observations from intravoxel incoherent motion analyses of patients based on breast tumors. To assess the presence of heterogeneity, the Cochran's Q tests for heterogeneity with a significance level of P < 0.1 and I2 statistic with values > 75% were used. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals of the true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusivity (D*), perfusion fraction (f) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated, and publication bias was evaluated using the Begg's and Egger's tests and also funnel plot. Data were analyzed by STATA v 16 (StataCorp, College Station).
Results
The pooled D value demonstrated good measurement performance showed a sensitivity 86%, specificity 86%, and AUC 0.91 (SMD − 1.50, P < 0.001) in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions, which was comparable to that of the ADC that showed a sensitivity of 76%, specificity 79%, and AUC 0.85 (SMD 1.34, P = 0.01), then by the f it showed a sensitivity 80%, specificity 76%, and AUC 0.85 (SMD 0.89, P = 0.001), and D* showed a sensitivity 84%, specificity 59%, and AUC 0.71 (SMD − 0.30, P = 0.20).
Conclusion
The estimated sensitivity and specificity in the current meta-analysis were acceptable. So, this approach can be used as a suitable method in the differentiation and evaluation response of breast tumors.
Collapse
|
7
|
Almutlaq ZM, Wilson DJ, Bacon SE, Sharma N, Stephens S, Dondo T, Buckley DL. Evaluation of Monoexponential, Stretched-Exponential and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI Diffusion Models in Early Response Monitoring to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer-A Preliminary Study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 56:1079-1088. [PMID: 35156741 PMCID: PMC9543625 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been a growing interest in exploring the applications of stretched-exponential (SEM) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) models of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in breast imaging, with the focus on differentiation of breast lesions. However, the use of SEM and IVIM models to predict early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has received less attention. PURPOSE To investigate the value of monoexponential, SEM, and IVIM models to predict early response to NACT in patients with primary breast cancer. STUDY TYPE Prospective. POPULATION Thirty-seven patients with primary breast cancer (aged 46 ± 11 years) due to undergo NACT. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES A 1.5-T MR scanner, T1 -weighted three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo, two-dimensional single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence (DWI) at six b-values (0-800 s mm-2 ). ASSESSMENT Tumor volume, apparent diffusion coefficient, tissue diffusion (Dt ), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (Dp ), perfusion fraction (f), distributed diffusion coefficient, and alpha (α) were extracted, following volumetric sampling of the tumors, at three time-points: pretreatment, post one and three cycles of NACT. STATISTICAL TESTS Mann-Whitney test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Statistical significance level was P < 0.05. RESULTS Following NACT, 17 patients were determined to be pathological responders and 20 nonresponders. Tumor volume was significantly larger in nonresponders at each MRI time-point and demonstrated reasonable performance in predicting response (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.83-0.87). No significant differences between groups were found in the diffusion coefficients at each time-point (P = 0.09-1). The parameters α (SEM), f, and f × Dp (IVIM) were able to differentiate between response groups after one cycle of NACT (AUC = 0.73, 0.72, and 0.74, respectively). CONCLUSION Diffusion coefficients derived from the monoexponential, SEM, and IVIM models did not predict pathological response. However, the IVIM-derived parameters f and f × Dp and the SEM-derived parameter α were able to predict response to NACT in breast cancer patients following one cycle of NACT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zyad M. Almutlaq
- Biomedical ImagingUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
- Radiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical SciencesKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health SciencesRiyadhSaudi Arabia
| | - Daniel J. Wilson
- Department of Medical Physics & EngineeringLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
| | - Sarah E. Bacon
- Department of Medical Physics & EngineeringLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
| | - Nisha Sharma
- Department of RadiologyLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
| | | | - Tatendashe Dondo
- Clinical and Population Sciences Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic MedicineUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mürtz P, Tsesarskiy M, Sprinkart AM, Block W, Savchenko O, Luetkens JA, Attenberger U, Pieper CC. Simplified intravoxel incoherent motion DWI for differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions. Eur Radiol Exp 2022; 6:48. [PMID: 36171532 PMCID: PMC9519819 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-022-00298-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate simplified intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating malignant versus benign breast lesions as (i) stand-alone tool and (ii) add-on to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Methods 1.5-T DWI data (b = 0, 50, 250, 800 s/mm2) were retrospectively analysed for 126 patients with malignant or benign breast lesions. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ADC (0, 800) and IVIM-based parameters D1′ = ADC (50, 800), D2′ = ADC (250, 800), f1′ = f (0, 50, 800), f2′ = f (0, 250, 800) and D*′ = D* (0, 50, 250, 800) were voxel-wise calculated without fitting procedures. Regions of interest were analysed in vital tumour and perfusion hot spots. Beside the single parameters, the combined use of D1′ with f1′ and D2′ with f2′ was evaluated. Lesion differentiation was investigated for lesions (i) with hyperintensity on DWI with b = 800 s/mm2 (n = 191) and (ii) with suspicious contrast-enhancement (n = 135). Results All lesions with suspicious contrast-enhancement appeared also hyperintense on DWI with b = 800 s/mm2. For task (i), best discrimination was reached for the combination of D1′ and f1′ using perfusion hot spot regions-of-interest (accuracy 93.7%), which was higher than that of ADC (86.9%, p = 0.003) and single IVIM parameters D1′ (88.0%) and f1′ (87.4%). For task (ii), best discrimination was reached for single parameter D1′ using perfusion hot spot regions-of-interest (92.6%), which were slightly but not significantly better than that of ADC (91.1%) and D2′ (88.1%). Adding f1′ to D1′ did not improve discrimination. Conclusions IVIM analysis yielded a higher accuracy than ADC. If stand-alone DWI is used, perfusion analysis is of special relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Mürtz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Mark Tsesarskiy
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Alois M Sprinkart
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Block
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.,Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Oleksandr Savchenko
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Julian A Luetkens
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrike Attenberger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Claus C Pieper
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mendez AM, Fang LK, Meriwether CH, Batasin SJ, Loubrie S, Rodríguez-Soto AE, Rakow-Penner RA. Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques. Front Oncol 2022; 12:844790. [PMID: 35880168 PMCID: PMC9307963 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.844790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) as a biomarker has been the subject of active investigation in the field of breast radiology. By quantifying the random motion of water within a voxel of tissue, DWI provides indirect metrics that reveal cellularity and architectural features. Studies show that data obtained from DWI may provide information related to the characterization, prognosis, and treatment response of breast cancer. The incorporation of DWI in breast imaging demonstrates its potential to serve as a non-invasive tool to help guide diagnosis and treatment. In this review, current technical literature of diffusion-weighted breast imaging will be discussed, in addition to clinical applications, advanced techniques, and emerging use in the field of radiomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley M. Mendez
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Lauren K. Fang
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Claire H. Meriwether
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Summer J. Batasin
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Stéphane Loubrie
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Ana E. Rodríguez-Soto
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Rebecca A. Rakow-Penner
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States,Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States,*Correspondence: Rebecca A. Rakow-Penner,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kong X, Zhang Q, Wu X, Zou T, Duan J, Song S, Nie J, Tao C, Tang M, Wang M, Zou J, Xie Y, Li Z, Li Z. Advances in Imaging in Evaluating the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:816297. [PMID: 35669440 PMCID: PMC9163342 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.816297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly widely used in breast cancer treatment, and accurate evaluation of its response provides essential information for treatment and prognosis. Thus, the imaging tools used to quantify the disease response are critical in evaluating and managing patients treated with NAC. We discussed the recent progress, advantages, and disadvantages of common imaging methods in assessing the efficacy of NAC for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianshu Kong
- Third Department of the Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Third Department of the Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Xuemei Wu
- Third Department of the Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Tianning Zou
- Third Department of the Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Jiajun Duan
- Third Department of the Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Shujie Song
- Department of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Jianyun Nie
- Third Department of the Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Chu Tao
- Third Department of the Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Mi Tang
- Department of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Maohua Wang
- First Department of the Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Jieya Zou
- Third Department of the Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Yu Xie
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Zhenhui Li
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Zhen Li
- Third Department of the Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nomogram for Early Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted MRI. Acad Radiol 2022; 29 Suppl 1:S155-S163. [PMID: 33593702 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The study investigated the potential of the combined use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting the pathological complete response (pCR) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) after two cycles of NAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-seven patients with breast cancer who underwent MR examination before and after two cycles of NAC were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort and a validation cohort (3:1 ratio). MRI parameters including tumor longest diameter, time-signal intensity curve, early enhanced ratio (E90), maximal enhanced ratio and ADC value were measured, and percentage change in MRI parameters were calculated. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate independent predictors of pCR in the training cohort. The validation cohort was used to test the prediction model, and the nomogram was created based on the prediction model. RESULTS This study demonstrated that the ADC value after two cycles of NAC (OR = 1.041, 95% CI (1.002, 1.081); p = 0.037), percentage decrease in E90 (OR = 0.927, 95% CI (0.881, 0.977); p =0.004) and percentage decrease in tumor size (OR = 0.948, 95% CI (0.909, 0.988); p = 0.011) were significantly important for independently predicting pCR. The prediction model yielded AUC of 0.939 and 0.944 in the training cohort and the validation cohort, respectively. CONCLUSION The combined use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging could accurately predict pCR after two cycles of NAC. The prediction model and the nomogram had strong predictive value to NAC.
Collapse
|
12
|
van der Hoogt KJJ, Schipper RJ, Winter-Warnars GA, Ter Beek LC, Loo CE, Mann RM, Beets-Tan RGH. Factors affecting the value of diffusion-weighted imaging for identifying breast cancer patients with pathological complete response on neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a systematic review. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:187. [PMID: 34921645 PMCID: PMC8684570 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01123-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This review aims to identify factors causing heterogeneity in breast DWI-MRI and their impact on its value for identifying breast cancer patients with pathological complete response (pCR) on neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). A search was performed on PubMed until April 2020 for studies analyzing DWI for identifying breast cancer patients with pCR on NST. Technical and clinical study aspects were extracted and assessed for variability. Twenty studies representing 1455 patients/lesions were included. The studies differed with respect to study population, treatment type, DWI acquisition technique, post-processing (e.g., mono-exponential/intravoxel incoherent motion/stretched exponential modeling), and timing of follow-up studies. For the acquisition and generation of ADC-maps, various b-value combinations were used. Approaches for drawing regions of interest on longitudinal MRIs were highly variable. Biological variability due to various molecular subtypes was usually not taken into account. Moreover, definitions of pCR varied. The individual areas under the curve for the studies range from 0.50 to 0.92. However, overlapping ranges of mean/median ADC-values at pre- and/or during and/or post-NST were found for the pCR and non-pCR groups between studies. The technical, clinical, and epidemiological heterogeneity may be causal for the observed variability in the ability of DWI to predict pCR accurately. This makes implementation of DWI for pCR prediction and evaluation based on one absolute ADC threshold for all breast cancer types undesirable. Multidisciplinary consensus and appropriate clinical study design, taking biological and therapeutic variation into account, is required for obtaining standardized, reliable, and reproducible DWI measurements for pCR/non-pCR identification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay J J van der Hoogt
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Robert J Schipper
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gonneke A Winter-Warnars
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leon C Ter Beek
- Department of Medical Physics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Claudette E Loo
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Danish Colorectal Cancer Unit South, Institute of Regional Health Research, Vejle University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Woitek R, McLean MA, Ursprung S, Rueda OM, Manzano Garcia R, Locke MJ, Beer L, Baxter G, Rundo L, Provenzano E, Kaggie J, Patterson A, Frary A, Field-Rayner J, Papalouka V, Kane J, Benjamin AJV, Gill AB, Priest AN, Lewis DY, Russell R, Grimmer A, White B, Latimer-Bowman B, Patterson I, Schiller A, Carmo B, Slough R, Lanz T, Wason J, Schulte RF, Chin SF, Graves MJ, Gilbert FJ, Abraham JE, Caldas C, Brindle KM, Sala E, Gallagher FA. Hyperpolarized Carbon-13 MRI for Early Response Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients. Cancer Res 2021; 81:6004-6017. [PMID: 34625424 PMCID: PMC7612070 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-1499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Hyperpolarized 13C-MRI is an emerging tool for probing tissue metabolism by measuring 13C-label exchange between intravenously injected hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate and endogenous tissue lactate. Here, we demonstrate that hyperpolarized 13C-MRI can be used to detect early response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Seven patients underwent multiparametric 1H-MRI and hyperpolarized 13C-MRI before and 7-11 days after commencing treatment. An increase in the lactate-to-pyruvate ratio of approximately 20% identified three patients who, following 5-6 cycles of treatment, showed pathological complete response. This ratio correlated with gene expression of the pyruvate transporter MCT1 and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), the enzyme catalyzing label exchange between pyruvate and lactate. Analysis of approximately 2,000 breast tumors showed that overexpression of LDHA and the hypoxia marker CAIX was associated with reduced relapse-free and overall survival. Hyperpolarized 13C-MRI represents a promising method for monitoring very early treatment response in breast cancer and has demonstrated prognostic potential. SIGNIFICANCE: Hyperpolarized carbon-13 MRI allows response assessment in patients with breast cancer after 7-11 days of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outperformed state-of-the-art and research quantitative proton MRI techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramona Woitek
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mary A McLean
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Center, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Stephan Ursprung
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Oscar M Rueda
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Center, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Raquel Manzano Garcia
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Center, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew J Locke
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Lucian Beer
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabrielle Baxter
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Leonardo Rundo
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Provenzano
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Joshua Kaggie
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Patterson
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Frary
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Johanna Field-Rayner
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Vasiliki Papalouka
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Justine Kane
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England
| | - Arnold J V Benjamin
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew B Gill
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew N Priest
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - David Y Lewis
- Molecular Imaging Laboratory Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Roslin Russell
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Center, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ashley Grimmer
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Brian White
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Beth Latimer-Bowman
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ilse Patterson
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Schiller
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Bruno Carmo
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rhys Slough
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - James Wason
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
| | | | - Suet-Feung Chin
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Center, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Martin J Graves
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona J Gilbert
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jean E Abraham
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Center, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England
| | - Kevin M Brindle
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Center, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Evis Sala
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ferdia A Gallagher
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li Z, Li J, Lu X, Qu M, Tian J, Lei J. The diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2021; 143:109931. [PMID: 34492627 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in predicting the pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science systematically to identify relevant studies from inception to December 2020. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. We extracted sufficient data to construct 2 × 2 tables and then used STATA 12.0 to perform data pooling, heterogeneity testing, meta-regression analysis and subgroup analysis. RESULTS A total of 41 articles were enrolled in this study, including 27 studies (2107 patients) on DCE-MRI and 23 studies (1321 patients) on DWI. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DCE-MRI were 0.75 and 0.79, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity of DWI were 0.77 and 0.75. There was no significant difference in sensitivity (P = 0.598) and specificity (P = 0.218) between DCE-MRI and DWI. And meta-regression analysis showed that both magnetic field strength and the time of examination had significant effects on heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS DWI might be a potential substitute for DCE-MRI in predicting the pathological response of breast cancer to NAC as there was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance between the two. However, considering that not all included studies directly compared the diagnostic performance of DWI and DCE-MRI in the same patients and the heterogeneity of the included studies, caution should be exercised in applying our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhifan Li
- The first Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Jinkui Li
- The first Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Xingru Lu
- First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Mengmeng Qu
- The first Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Jinhui Tian
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
| | - Junqiang Lei
- First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Li K, Machireddy A, Tudorica A, Moloney B, Oh KY, Jafarian N, Partridge SC, Li X, Huang W. Discrimination of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions Using Quantitative Multiparametric MRI: A Preliminary Study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 6:148-159. [PMID: 32548291 PMCID: PMC7289240 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2019.00028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to compare diagnostic performance in discriminating malignant and benign breast lesions between two intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) analysis methods for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) data and between DW- and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI, and to determine if combining DW- and DCE-MRI further improves diagnostic accuracy. DW-MRI with 12 b-values and DCE-MRI were performed on 26 patients with 28 suspicious breast lesions before biopsies. The traditional biexponential fitting and a 3-b-value method were used for independent IVIM analysis of the DW-MRI data. Simulations were performed to evaluate errors in IVIM parameter estimations by the two methods across a range of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Pharmacokinetic modeling of DCE-MRI data was performed. Conventional radiological MRI reading yielded 86% sensitivity and 21% specificity in breast cancer diagnosis. At the same sensitivity, specificity of individual DCE- and DW-MRI markers improved to 36%–57% and that of combined DCE- or combined DW-MRI markers to 57%–71%, with DCE-MRI markers showing better diagnostic performance. The combination of DCE- and DW-MRI markers further improved specificity to 86%–93% and the improvements in diagnostic accuracy were statistically significant (P < .05) when compared with standard clinical MRI reading and most individual markers. At low breast DW-MRI SNR values (<50), like those typically seen in clinical studies, the 3-b-value approach for IVIM analysis generates markers with smaller errors and with comparable or better diagnostic performances compared with biexponential fitting. This suggests that the 3-b-value method could be an optimal IVIM-MRI method to be combined with DCE-MRI for improved diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt Li
- International School of Beaverton, Aloha, OR
| | - Archana Machireddy
- Center for Spoken Language Understanding, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Alina Tudorica
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Brendan Moloney
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and
| | - Karen Y Oh
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Neda Jafarian
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | | | - Xin Li
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and
| | - Wei Huang
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Suo S, Yin Y, Geng X, Zhang D, Hua J, Cheng F, Chen J, Zhuang Z, Cao M, Xu J. Diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: evaluation with mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential models. J Transl Med 2021; 19:236. [PMID: 34078388 PMCID: PMC8173748 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-02886-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI with mono-, bi- and stretched-exponential models in predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer, and further outline a predictive model of pCR combining DW MRI parameters, contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI findings, and/or clinical-pathologic variables. Methods In this retrospective study, 144 women who underwent NACT and subsequently received surgery for invasive breast cancer were included. Breast MRI including multi-b-value DW imaging was performed before (pre-treatment), after two cycles (mid-treatment), and after all four cycles (post-treatment) of NACT. Quantitative DW imaging parameters were computed according to the mono-exponential (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]), bi-exponential (pseudodiffusion coefficient and perfusion fraction), and stretched-exponential (distributed diffusion coefficient and intravoxel heterogeneity index) models. Tumor size and relative enhancement ratio of the tumor were measured on contrast-enhanced MRI at each time point. Pre-treatment parameters and changes in parameters at mid- and post-treatment relative to baseline were compared between pCR and non-pCR groups. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and multivariate regression analysis were performed. Results Of the 144 patients, 54 (37.5%) achieved pCR after NACT. Overall, among all DW and CE MRI measures, flow-insensitive ADC change (ΔADC200,1000) at mid-treatment showed the highest diagnostic performance for predicting pCR, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.831 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.747, 0.915; P < 0.001). The model combining pre-treatment estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 statuses and mid-treatment ΔADC200,1000 improved the AUC to 0.905 (95% CI: 0.843, 0.966; P < 0.001). Conclusion Mono-exponential flow-insensitive ADC change at mid-treatment was a predictor of pCR after NACT in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiteng Suo
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 160, Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China.,Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Yin
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 160, Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Xiaochuan Geng
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 160, Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Dandan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 160, Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Jia Hua
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 160, Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| | - Fang Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 160, Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 160, Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| | - Zhiguo Zhuang
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 160, Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Mengqiu Cao
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 160, Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Jianrong Xu
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 160, Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Liu B, Ma WL, Zhang GW, Sun Z, Wei MQ, Hou WH, Hou BX, Wei LC, Huan Y. Potentialities of multi-b-values diffusion-weighted imaging for predicting efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer patients. BMC Med Imaging 2020; 20:97. [PMID: 32799809 PMCID: PMC7429470 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-020-00496-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To testify whether multi-b-values diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can be used to ultra-early predict treatment response of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in cervical cancer patients and to assess the predictive ability of concerning parameters. METHODS Fifty-three patients with biopsy proved cervical cancer were retrospectively recruited in this study. All patients underwent pelvic multi-b-values DWI before and at the 3rd day during treatment. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion coefficient (Dslow), perfusion-related pseudo-diffusion coefficient (Dfast), perfusion fraction (f), distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) and intravoxel diffusion heterogeneity index(α) were generated by mono-exponential, bi-exponential and stretched exponential models. Treatment response was assessed based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) at 1 month after the completion of whole CCRT. Parameters were compared using independent t test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was used for statistical evaluations. RESULTS ADC-T0 (p = 0.02), Dslow-T0 (p < 0.01), DDC-T0 (p = 0.03), ADC-T1 (p < 0.01), Dslow-T1 (p < 0.01), ΔADC (p = 0.04) and Δα (p < 0.01) were significant lower in non-CR group patients. ROC analyses showed that ADC-T1 and Δα exhibited high prediction value, with area under the curves of 0.880 and 0.869, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Multi-b-values DWI can be used as a noninvasive technique to assess and predict treatment response in cervical cancer patients at the 3rd day of CCRT. ADC-T1 and Δα can be used to differentiate good responders from poor responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Liu
- Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, P. R. China, 710032
| | - Wan-Ling Ma
- Department of radiology, Longgang District People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P. R. China, 518172
| | - Guang-Wen Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, P. R. China, 710032
| | - Zhen Sun
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, P. R. China, 710032
| | - Meng-Qi Wei
- Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, P. R. China, 710032
| | - Wei-Huan Hou
- Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, P. R. China, 710032
| | - Bing-Xin Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, P. R. China, 710032
| | - Li-Chun Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, P. R. China, 710032
| | - Yi Huan
- Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, P. R. China, 710032.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mi HL, Suo ST, Cheng JJ, Yin X, Zhu L, Dong SJ, Huang SS, Lin C, Xu JR, Lu Q. The invasion status of lymphovascular space and lymph nodes in cervical cancer assessed by mono-exponential and bi-exponential DWI-related parameters. Clin Radiol 2020; 75:763-771. [PMID: 32723502 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM To investigate whether mono-exponential and bi-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-related parameters of the primary tumour can evaluate the status of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with cervical carcinoma preoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty patients with cervical carcinoma were enrolled, who underwent preoperative multi b-value DWI and radical hysterectomy. They were classified into LVSI(+) versus LVSI(-) and LNM(+) versus LNM(-) according to postoperative pathology. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure molecular diffusion (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D∗), and perfusion fraction (f) were calculated from the whole tumour (_whole) and tumour margin (_margin). All parameters were compared between LVSI(+) and LVSI(-) and between LNM(+) and LNM(-). Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of these parameters. RESULTS f_margin and D∗_whole showed significant differences in differentiating LVSI(+) from LVSI(-) tumours (p=0.002, 0.008, respectively), while LNM(+) tumours presented with significantly higher ADC_margin than that of LNM(-) tumours (p=0.009). The other parameters were not independent related factors with the status of LVSI or LNM according to logistic regression analysis (p>0.05). The area under the ROC curve of f_margin combined with D∗_whole in discriminating LVSI(+) from LVSI(-) was 0.826 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.691-0.961), while ADC_margin in differentiating LNM(+) from LNM(-) was 0.788 (95% CI: 0.648-0.928). CONCLUSIONS The parameters generated from mono-exponential and bi-exponential DWI of the primary cervical carcinoma could help discriminate its status regarding LVSI (f_margin and D∗_whole) and LNM (ADC_margin).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H L Mi
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - S T Suo
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - J J Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - X Yin
- Department of Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - L Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - S J Dong
- Department of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 516 Jungong Rd, Shanghai, 20093, China
| | - S S Huang
- Department of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 516 Jungong Rd, Shanghai, 20093, China
| | - C Lin
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - J R Xu
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Q Lu
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Iima M, Honda M, Sigmund EE, Ohno Kishimoto A, Kataoka M, Togashi K. Diffusion MRI of the breast: Current status and future directions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 52:70-90. [PMID: 31520518 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is increasingly being incorporated into routine breast MRI protocols in many institutions worldwide, and there are abundant breast DWI indications ranging from lesion detection and distinguishing malignant from benign tumors to assessing prognostic biomarkers of breast cancer and predicting treatment response. DWI has the potential to serve as a noncontrast MR screening method. Beyond apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping, which is a commonly used quantitative DWI measure, advanced DWI models such as intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), non-Gaussian diffusion MRI, and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) are extensively exploited in this field, allowing the characterization of tissue perfusion and architecture and improving diagnostic accuracy without the use of contrast agents. This review will give a summary of the clinical literature along with future directions. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:70-90.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mami Iima
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Clinical Innovative Medicine, Institute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Maya Honda
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Eric E Sigmund
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
- Center for Advanced Imaging and Innovation (CAI2R), New York, New York, USA
| | - Ayami Ohno Kishimoto
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masako Kataoka
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kaori Togashi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wang H, Mao X. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY 2020; 14:2423-2433. [PMID: 32606609 PMCID: PMC7308147 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s253961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly used in breast cancer, especially for downstaging the primary tumor in the breast and the metastatic axillary lymph node. Accurate evaluations of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy provide important information on the impact of systemic therapies on breast cancer biology, prognosis, and guidance for further therapy. Moreover, pathologic complete response is a validated and valuable surrogate prognostic factor of survival after therapy. Evaluations of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response are very important in clinical work and basic research. In this review, we will elaborate on evaluations of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer and provide a clinical evaluation procedure for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyun Mao
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Iima M. Perfusion-driven Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MRI in Oncology: Applications, Challenges, and Future Trends. Magn Reson Med Sci 2020; 20:125-138. [PMID: 32536681 PMCID: PMC8203481 DOI: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2019-0124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent developments in MR hardware and software have allowed a surge of interest in intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI in oncology. Beyond diffusion-weighted imaging (and the standard apparent diffusion coefficient mapping most commonly used clinically), IVIM provides information on tissue microcirculation without the need for contrast agents. In oncology, perfusion-driven IVIM MRI has already shown its potential for the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign tumors, as well as for detecting prognostic biomarkers and treatment monitoring. Current developments in IVIM data processing, and its use as a method of scanning patients who cannot receive contrast agents, are expected to increase further utilization. This paper reviews the current applications, challenges, and future trends of perfusion-driven IVIM in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mami Iima
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.,Department of Clinical Innovative Medicine, Institute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science (iACT), Kyoto University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Doudou NR, Liu Y, Kampo S, Zhang K, Dai Y, Wang S. Optimization of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM): variability of parameters measurements using a reduced distribution of b values for breast tumors analysis. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2020; 33:273-281. [PMID: 31571014 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-019-00779-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to examine the variability of intravoxel incoherent motion measurements acquired from reduced distributions of b values for breast tumors analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS The investigations were carried out on twenty-four patients with diagnosed breast tumors. A conventional unenhanced MRI and various IVIM series preset with different distributions of b values (0-1000 s/mm2) were performed. We assessed the variability in Dslow, Dfast, and PF measurements for different distributions of 9 to 4 b values compared with the IVIM metrics for 10 b values using Wilcoxon-Signed rank test. The data was statistically significant at P < 0.05. RESULTS The results showed no significant variation in the estimations of IVIM parameters in patients. However, the measurements acquired with the combination of 5 b values Showed some variation in Dfast (P = 0.028) compared with 10 b values. The data showed high wCVs in the measurements acquired using the reduced set of 6 b values for Dslow and PF and with the combination of 7 b values for Dfast. There were inconsistencies noticed in the measurements acquired from malignant tumors using reduced distributions of b values (9 b values-4 b values). However, the set of 4 b values displayed the lowest wCVs for both benign and malignant datasets. We also observed unsystematic correlations among different combinations of b values in the categories of IVIM parameters. CONCLUSION There was no relevant variation in the parameters measurements irrespective of the number of b values used. Reduced distributions of b values may find use in estimations of IVIM parameters for breast lesions analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natacha Raissa Doudou
- Department of Radiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yajie Liu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Sylvanus Kampo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yue Dai
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Shaowu Wang
- Department of Radiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Reig B, Heacock L, Lewin A, Cho N, Moy L. Role of MRI to Assess Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 52. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriu Reig
- Department of Radiology New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA
- New York University Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center New York New York USA
| | - Laura Heacock
- Department of Radiology New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA
- New York University Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center New York New York USA
| | - Alana Lewin
- Department of Radiology New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA
- New York University Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center New York New York USA
| | - Nariya Cho
- Department of Radiology Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiology Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea
| | - Linda Moy
- Department of Radiology New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA
- New York University Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center New York New York USA
- Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2 R) New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sun J, Wu G, Shan F, Meng Z. The Value of IVIM DWI in Combination with Conventional MRI in Identifying the Residual Tumor After Cone Biopsy for Early Cervical Carcinoma. Acad Radiol 2019; 26:1040-1047. [PMID: 30385207 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To investigate the value of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in combination with conventional MRI in identifying the residual tumor after biopsy for early cervical carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty patients with histologically proven early cervical carcinoma were enrolled into this study. MRI sequences included two sets of MRI sequences including conventional MRI (T1WI, T2WI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI) and IVIM DWI/conventional MRI combinations. The patients were classified into residual tumor and nonresidual tumor group after biopsy. IVIM parameters were quantitatively analyzed and compared between two groups. The diagnostic ability of two sets of MRI sequences were calculated and compared. RESULTS The mean D and f values were significantly lower in residual tumor group than in nonresidual tumor group (p < 0.05). The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of D and f for discriminating between residual tumor and nonresidual tumor group were 0.848 and 0.767, respectively. The sensitivity and accuracy of conventional MRI/IVIM DWI combinations for the detection of residual tumor were 82.7% and 83.8%, respectively, while the sensitivity and accuracy of conventional MRI were 52.4% and 53.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION The addition of IVIM DWI to conventional MRI considerably improves the sensitivity and accuracy of the detection of residual tumor after biopsy for early cervical carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junqi Sun
- Department of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430071, Hubei Province, China
| | - Guangyao Wu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430071, Hubei Province, China.
| | - Feifei Shan
- Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Yuebei People's Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Zhihua Meng
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Yuebei People's Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Doudou NR, Kampo S, Liu Y, Ahmmed B, Zeng D, Zheng M, Mohamadou A, Wen QP, Wang S. Monitoring the Early Antiproliferative Effect of the Analgesic-Antitumor Peptide, BmK AGAP on Breast Cancer Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion With a Reduced Distribution of Four b-Values. Front Physiol 2019; 10:708. [PMID: 31293432 PMCID: PMC6598093 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The present study aimed to investigate the possibility of using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantitatively assess the early therapeutic effect of the analgesic–antitumor peptide BmK AGAP on breast cancer and also evaluate the medical value of a reduced distribution of four b-values. Methods: IVIM diffusion MRI using 10 b-values and 4 b-values (0–1,000 s/mm2) was performed at five different time points on BALB/c mice bearing xenograft breast tumors treated with BmK AGAP. Variability in Dslow, Dfast, PF, and ADC derived from the set of 10 b-values and 4 b-values was assessed to evaluate the antitumor effect of BmK AGAP on breast tumor. Results: The data showed that PF values significantly decreased in rBmK AGAP-treated mice on day 12 (P = 0.044). PF displayed the greatest AUC but with a poor medical value (AUC = 0.65). The data showed no significant difference between IVIM measurements acquired from the two sets of b-values at different time points except in the PF on the day 3. The within-subject coefficients of variation were relatively higher in Dfast and PF. However, except for a case noticed on day 0 in PF measurements, the results indicated no statistically significant difference at various time points in the rBmK AGAP-treated or the untreated group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: IVIM showed poor medical value in the early evaluation of the antiproliferative effect of rBmK AGAP in breast cancer, suggesting sensitivity in PF. A reduced distribution of four b-values may provide remarkable measurements but with a potential loss of accuracy in the perfusion-related parameter PF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natacha Raissa Doudou
- Department of Radiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.,Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Sylvanus Kampo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.,Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yajie Liu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Bulbul Ahmmed
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Liaoning Provincial Core Lab of Glycobiology and Glycoengineering, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Dewei Zeng
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Minting Zheng
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Aminou Mohamadou
- Department of Radiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Qing-Ping Wen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.,Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Shaowu Wang
- Department of Radiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.,Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kato H, Esaki K, Yamaguchi T, Tanaka H, Kajita K, Furui T, Morishige KI, Goshima S, Matsuo M. Predicting Early Response to Chemoradiotherapy for Uterine Cervical Cancer Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2019; 18:293-298. [PMID: 30787252 PMCID: PMC6883093 DOI: 10.2463/mrms.tn.2018-0138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
To assess if intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging can be used to predict early response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in cervical cancer. IVIM imaging before and during CRT (at doses of 20 and 40 Gy) was performed in 17 patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma. The percentage changes of IVIM parameters were significantly higher for complete remission (CR) than non-CR groups. IVIM may play a supplementary role for predicting early response to CRT in cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Kato
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University School of Medicine
| | - Kae Esaki
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Partridge SC, Zhang Z, Newitt DC, Gibbs JE, Chenevert TL, Rosen MA, Bolan PJ, Marques HS, Romanoff J, Cimino L, Joe BN, Umphrey HR, Ojeda-Fournier H, Dogan B, Oh K, Abe H, Drukteinis JS, Esserman LJ, Hylton NM. Diffusion-weighted MRI Findings Predict Pathologic Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer: The ACRIN 6698 Multicenter Trial. Radiology 2018; 289:618-627. [PMID: 30179110 PMCID: PMC6283325 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018180273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 181] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Revised: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To determine if the change in tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) at diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI is predictive of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Materials and Methods In this prospective multicenter study, 272 consecutive women with breast cancer were enrolled at 10 institutions (from August 2012 to January 2015) and were randomized to treatment with 12 weekly doses of paclitaxel (with or without an experimental agent), followed by 12 weeks of treatment with four cycles of anthracycline. Each woman underwent breast DW MRI before treatment, at early treatment (3 weeks), at midtreatment (12 weeks), and after treatment. Percentage change in tumor ADC from that before treatment (ΔADC) was measured at each time point. Performance for predicting pCR was assessed by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the overall cohort and according to tumor hormone receptor (HR)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) disease subtype. Results The final analysis included 242 patients with evaluable serial imaging data, with a mean age of 48 years ± 10 (standard deviation); 99 patients had HR-positive (hereafter, HR+)/HER2-negative (hereafter, HER2-) disease, 77 patients had HR-/HER2- disease, 42 patients had HR+/HER2+ disease, and 24 patients had HR-/HER2+ disease. Eighty (33%) of 242 patients experienced pCR. Overall, ΔADC was moderately predictive of pCR at midtreatment/12 weeks (AUC = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52, 0.68; P = .017) and after treatment (AUC = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.69; P = .013). Across the four disease subtypes, midtreatment ΔADC was predictive only for HR+/HER2- tumors (AUC = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.89; P < .001). In a test subset, a model combining tumor subtype and midtreatment ΔADC improved predictive performance (AUC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.83) over ΔADC alone (AUC = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.70; P = .032.). Conclusion After 12 weeks of therapy, change in breast tumor apparent diffusion coefficient at MRI predicts complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savannah C. Partridge
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Zheng Zhang
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - David C. Newitt
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Jessica E. Gibbs
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Thomas L. Chenevert
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Mark A. Rosen
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Patrick J. Bolan
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Helga S. Marques
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Justin Romanoff
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Lisa Cimino
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Bonnie N. Joe
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Heidi R. Umphrey
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Haydee Ojeda-Fournier
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Basak Dogan
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Karen Oh
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Hiroyuki Abe
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Jennifer S. Drukteinis
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Laura J. Esserman
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - Nola M. Hylton
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| | - For the ACRIN 6698 Trial Team and I-SPY 2 Trial Investigators
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825
Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (S.C.P.); Department of Biostatistics
(Z.Z.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.), Brown
University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network
(ACRIN), Reston, Va (Z.Z., H.S.M., J.R.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (D.C.N.,
J.E.G., B.N.J., L.J.E., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for
Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
(P.J.B.); American College of Radiology and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group,
Reston, Va (L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Birmingham, Ala (H.R.U.); Department of Radiology, University of California, San
Diego, San Diego, Calif (H.O.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.D.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, Ore (K.O.); Department of Radiology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Ill (H.A.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla and Department of
Women’s Imaging, St Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Tampa, Fla (J.S.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yuan L, Li JJ, Li CQ, Yan CG, Cheng ZL, Wu YK, Hao P, Lin BQ, Xu YK. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of locally advanced breast carcinoma: the optimal time window of predicting the early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Imaging 2018; 18:38. [PMID: 30373679 PMCID: PMC6206724 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-018-0173-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background It is very difficult to predict the early response to NAC only on the basis of change in tumor size. ADC value derived from DWI promises to be a valuable parameter for evaluating the early response to treatment. This study aims to establish the optimal time window of predicting the early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for different subtypes of locally advanced breast carcinoma using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Methods We conducted an institutional review board-approved prospective clinical study of 142 patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma. All patients underwent conventional MR and DW examinations prior to treatment and after first, second, third, fourth, sixth and eighth cycle of NAC. The response to NAC was classified into a pathologic complete response (pCR) and a non-pCR group. DWI parameters were compared between two groups, and the optimal time window for predicting tumor response was established for each chemotherapy regimen. Results For all the genomic subtypes, there were significant differences in baseline ADC value between pCR and non-pCR group (p < 0.05). The time point prior to treatment could be considered as the ideal time point regardless of genomic subtype. In the group that started with taxanes or anthracyclines, for Luminal A or Luminal B subtype, postT1 could be used as the ideal time point during chemotherapy; for Basal-like or HER2-enriched subtype, postT2 as the ideal time point during chemotherapy. In the group that started with taxanes and anthracyclines, for HER2-enriched, Luminal B or Basal-like subtype, postT1 could be used as the ideal time point during chemotherapy; for Luminal A subtype, postT2 as the ideal time point during chemotherapy. Conclusions The time point prior to treatment can be considered as the optimal time point regardless of genomic subtype. For each chemotherapy regimen, the optimal time point during chemotherapy varies across different genomic subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Yuan
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, #1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou City, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.,Department of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital, Haikou, 570311, Hainan Province, China
| | - Jian-Jun Li
- Department of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital, Haikou, 570311, Hainan Province, China
| | - Chang-Qing Li
- Department of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital, Haikou, 570311, Hainan Province, China
| | - Cheng-Gong Yan
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, #1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou City, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ze-Long Cheng
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, #1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou City, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yuan-Kui Wu
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, #1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou City, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Peng Hao
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, #1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou City, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Bing-Quan Lin
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, #1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou City, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yi-Kai Xu
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, #1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou City, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Li F, Wang H, Hou J, Tang J, Lu Q, Wang L, Yu X. Utility of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting early response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Radiol 2018; 73:756.e17-756.e26. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
30
|
Gao W, Guo N, Dong T. Diffusion-weighted imaging in monitoring the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2018; 16:145. [PMID: 30021656 PMCID: PMC6052572 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1438-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is suggested as an non-invasive and non-radioactive imaging modality in the identification of pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). A growing number of trials have been investigating in this aspect and some studies found a superior performance of DWI compared with conventional imaging techniques. However, the efficiency of DWI is still in dispute. This meta-analysis aims at evaluating the accuracy of DWI in the detection of pCR to NACT in patients with breast cancer. Methods Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were drawn to estimate the diagnostic effect of DWI to NACT. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC), the area under the SROC curve (AUC), and Youden index (*Q) were also calculated. The possible sources of heterogeneity among the included studies were explored using single-factor meta-regression analyses. Publication bias and quality assessment were assessed using Deek’s funnel plot and QUADAS-2 form respectively. Results Twenty studies incorporated 1490 participants were enrolled in our analysis. Pooled estimates revealed a sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86–0.91), a specificity of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.68–0.75), and a DOR of 27.00 (95% CI, 15.60–46.73). The AUC of SROC curve and *Q index were 0.9088 and 0.8408, respectively. The results of meta-regression analyses showed that pCR rate, time duration of study population, and study design were not the sources of heterogeneity. Conclusion A relatively high sensitivity and specificity of DWI in diagnosing pCP for patients with breast cancer underwent NACT treatment was found in our meta-analysis. This finding indicated that the use of DWI might provide an accurate and precise assessment of pCR to NACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Gao
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Tianjin Fourth Central Hospital, No.1 Zhongshan Road, Hebei District, Tianjin, 300010, China
| | - Ning Guo
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tianjin Fourth Central Hospital, No.1 Zhongshan Road, Hebei District, Tianjin, 300010, China
| | - Ting Dong
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, No. 83 Zhongshandong Road, Guiyang City, 550002, Guizhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kim Y, Kim SH, Lee HW, Song BJ, Kang BJ, Lee A, Nam Y. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 48:27-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2017] [Revised: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
32
|
Mozumder M, Beltrachini L, Collier Q, Pozo JM, Frangi AF. Simultaneous magnetic resonance diffusion and pseudo-diffusion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 2018; 79:2367-2378. [PMID: 28714249 PMCID: PMC5836966 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Revised: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE An emerging topic in diffusion magnetic resonance is imaging blood microcirculation alongside water diffusion using the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model. Recently, a combined IVIM diffusion tensor imaging (IVIM-DTI) model was proposed, which accounts for both anisotropic pseudo-diffusion due to blood microcirculation and anisotropic diffusion due to tissue microstructures. In this article, we propose a robust IVIM-DTI approach for simultaneous diffusion and pseudo-diffusion tensor imaging. METHODS Conventional IVIM estimation methods can be broadly divided into two-step (diffusion and pseudo-diffusion estimated separately) and one-step (diffusion and pseudo-diffusion estimated simultaneously) methods. Here, both methods were applied on the IVIM-DTI model. An improved one-step method based on damped Gauss-Newton algorithm and a Gaussian prior for the model parameters was also introduced. The sensitivities of these methods to different parameter initializations were tested with realistic in silico simulations and experimental in vivo data. RESULTS The one-step damped Gauss-Newton method with a Gaussian prior was less sensitive to noise and the choice of initial parameters and delivered more accurate estimates of IVIM-DTI parameters compared to the other methods. CONCLUSION One-step estimation using damped Gauss-Newton and a Gaussian prior is a robust method for simultaneous diffusion and pseudo-diffusion tensor imaging using IVIM-DTI model. Magn Reson Med 79:2367-2378, 2018. © 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghdoot Mozumder
- Center for Computational Imaging & Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB)Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, The University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Leandro Beltrachini
- Center for Computational Imaging & Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB)Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, The University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Quinten Collier
- iMinds Vision LabDepartment of Physics, University of Antwerp (CDE)AntwerpenBelgium
| | - Jose M. Pozo
- Center for Computational Imaging & Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB)Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, The University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Alejandro F. Frangi
- Center for Computational Imaging & Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB)Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, The University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chu W, Jin W, Liu D, Wang J, Geng C, Chen L, Huang X. Diffusion-weighted imaging in identifying breast cancer pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017; 9:7088-7100. [PMID: 29467952 PMCID: PMC5805538 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is increasingly used to identify pathological complete responses (pCRs) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. The aim of the present study was to assess the utility of DWI using a pooled analysis. Materials and Methods Literature databases were searched prior to July 2017. Fifteen studies with a total of 1181 patients were included. The data were extracted to perform pooled analysis, heterogeneity testing, threshold effect testing, sensitivity analysis, publication bias analysis and subgroup analyses. Result The methodological quality was moderate. Remarkable heterogeneity was detected, primarily due to a threshold effect. The pooled weighted values were a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81, 0.92), a specificity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.86), a positive likelihood ratio of 4.1 (95% CI: 2.9, 5.9), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.16 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.24), and a diagnostic odds ratio of 26 (95% CI: 15, 46). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.93). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled specificity of change in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) subgroup was higher than that in the pre-treatment ADC subgroup (0.80 [95% CI: 0.71, 087] vs. 0.63 [95% CI: 0.52, 0.73], P = 0.027). Conclusions DWI may be an accurate and nonradioactive imaging technique for identifying pCRs to NAC in breast cancer. Nonetheless, there are a variety of issues when assessing DWI techniques for estimating breast cancer responses to NAC, and large scale and well-designed clinical trials are needed to assess the technique's diagnostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Chu
- Department of Radiology, Wuxi Huishan District People's Hospital, Jiangsu Province, 214187, China
| | - Weiwei Jin
- Department of Radiology, Wuxi Second Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jiangsu Province, 214121, China
| | - Daihong Liu
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China
| | - Chengjun Geng
- Department of Radiology, PLA No.101 Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, 214044, China
| | - Lihua Chen
- Department of Radiology, PLA No.101 Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, 214044, China
| | - Xuequan Huang
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Li X, Wang P, Li D, Zhu H, Meng L, Song Y, Xie L, Zhu J, Yu T. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging of early cervical carcinoma: correlation between imaging parameters and tumor-stroma ratio. Eur Radiol 2017; 28:1875-1883. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5183-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
35
|
Cho GY, Gennaro L, Sutton EJ, Zabor EC, Zhang Z, Giri D, Moy L, Sodickson DK, Morris EA, Sigmund EE, Thakur SB. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) histogram biomarkers for prediction of neoadjuvant treatment response in breast cancer patients. Eur J Radiol Open 2017; 4:101-107. [PMID: 28856177 PMCID: PMC5565789 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2017.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2017] [Accepted: 07/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the prognostic capabilities of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) metrics and their ability to predict response to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). Additionally, to observe changes in IVIM metrics between pre- and post-treatment MRI. METHODS This IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study observed 31 breast cancer patients (32 lesions). Patients underwent standard bilateral breast MRI along with diffusion-weighted imaging before and after NAT. Six patients underwent an additional IVIM-MRI scan 12-14 weeks after initial scan and 2 cycles of treatment. In addition to apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) from monoexponential decay, IVIM mean values (tissue diffusivity Dt, perfusion fraction fp, and pseudodiffusivity Dp) and histogram metrics were derived using a biexponential model. An additional filter identified voxels of highly vascular tumor tissue (VTT), excluding necrotic or normal tissue. Clinical data include histology of biopsy and clinical response to treatment through RECIST assessment. Comparisons of treatment response were made using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS Average, kurtosis, and skewness of pseudodiffusion Dp significantly differentiated RECIST responders from nonresponders. ADC and Dt values generally increased (∼70%) and VTT% values generally decreased (∼20%) post-treatment. CONCLUSION Dp metrics showed prognostic capabilities; slow and heterogeneous pseudodiffusion offer poor prognosis. Baseline ADC/Dt parameters were not significant predictors of response. This work suggests that IVIM mean values and heterogeneity metrics may have prognostic value in the setting of breast cancer NAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gene Y Cho
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA.,Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Lucas Gennaro
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Sutton
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Emily C Zabor
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Dilip Giri
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Linda Moy
- Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA.,Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Daniel K Sodickson
- Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA.,Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Morris
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Eric E Sigmund
- Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA.,Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Sunitha B Thakur
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bakke KM, Hole KH, Dueland S, Grøholt KK, Flatmark K, Ree AH, Seierstad T, Redalen KR. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer: tumour volume and perfusion fraction predict chemoradiotherapy response and survival. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:813-818. [PMID: 28464745 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1287951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), responses to preoperative treatment are highly heterogeneous and more accurate diagnostics are likely to enable more individualised treatment approaches with improved responses. We investigated the potential of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW MRI), with quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and perfusion fraction (F), as well as volumetry from T2-weighted (T2W) MRI, for prediction of therapeutic outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS In 27 LARC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before chemoradiotherapy (CRT), T2W- and DW MRI were obtained before and after NACT. Tumour volumes were delineated in T2W MRI and ADCs and Fs were estimated from DW MRI using a simplified approach to the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model. Mean tumour values and histogram analysis of whole-tumour heterogeneity were correlated with histopathologic tumour regression grade (TRG) and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS At baseline, high tumour F predicted good tumour response (TRG1-2) (AUC = 0.79, p = 0.01), with a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 100%. The combination of F and tumour volume (Fpre/Vpre) gave the highest prediction of poor tumour response (AUC = 0.93, p < 0.001) with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 91%, and also predicted PFS (p < 0.01). Baseline tumour ADC was not significantly related to therapeutic outcome, whereas a positive change in ADC from baseline to after NACT, ΔADC, significantly predicted good tumour response (AUC = 0.83, p < 0.01, 83% sensitivity, 73% specificity), but not PFS. CONCLUSIONS The MRI parameter F/V at baseline was a remarkably strong predictor of both histopathologic tumour response and 5-year PFS in patients with LARC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kine Mari Bakke
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Håkon Hole
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Svein Dueland
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Kjersti Flatmark
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Hansen Ree
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Therese Seierstad
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kathrine Røe Redalen
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yang K, Zhang XM, Yang L, Xu H, Peng J. Advanced imaging techniques in the therapeutic response of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:4835-4847. [PMID: 27239110 PMCID: PMC4873876 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Revised: 03/29/2016] [Accepted: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic liver disease. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) can significantly improve the survival rate of patients with HCC and is the first treatment choice for patients who are not suitable for surgical resections. The evaluation of the response to TACE treatment affects not only the assessment of the therapy efficacy but also the development of the next step in the treatment plan. The use of imaging to examine changes in tumor volume to assess the response of solid tumors to treatment has been controversial. In recent years, the emergence of new imaging technology has made it possible to observe the response of tumors to treatment prior to any morphological changes. In this article, the advances in studies reporting the use of computed tomography perfusion imaging, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), intravoxel incoherent motion, diffusion kurtosis imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, magnetic resonance perfusion-weighted imaging, blood oxygen level-dependent MRI, positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography and PET/MRI to assess the TACE treatment response are reviewed.
Collapse
|