1
|
Yiu WS, Chu TSM, Meng Y, Kong FMS. DNA Repair Genetics and the Risk of Radiation Pneumonitis in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:e182-e196. [PMID: 38653664 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
AIMS ERCC1 rs11615 and ERCC2 rs238406 single nuclear polymorphism (SNPs) are known for their association with treatment outcome, likely related to radiosensitivity of both tumor and normal tissue in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. This study aimed to review the effect of 1) these ERCC1/2 SNPs and 2) other SNPs of DNA repair genes on radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients with lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS SNPs of our interest included ERCC1 rs11615 and ERCC2 rs238406 and other genes of DNA repair pathways that are functional and biologically active. DNA repair SNPs reported by at least two independent studies were pooled for meta-analysis. The study endpoint was radiation pneumonitis (RP) after radiotherapy. Recessive, dominant, homozygous, heterozygous, and allelic genotype models were used where appropriate. RESULTS A total of 16 studies (3080 patients) were identified from the systematic review and 12 studies (2090 patients) on 11 SNPs were included in the meta-analysis. The SNPs were ATM rs189037, ATM rs373759, NEIL1 rs4462560, NEIL1 rs7402844, APE1 rs1130409, XRCC3 rs861539, ERCC1 rs11615, ERCC1 rs3212986, ERCC2 rs238406, ERCC2 rs13181, and XRCC1 rs25487. ERCC1 rs11615 (236 patients) and ERCC2 rs238406 (254 patients) were not significantly associated with RP. Using the allelic model, the G allele for NEIL1 gene was significantly associated with a reduced odds of developing symptomatic (grade ≥2) RP compared to the C allele for rs7402844 (OR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.99, P = 0.04). Similarly, the T allele for APE1 gene was significantly associated with a reduced odds of developing symptomatic (grade ≥2) RP compared to the G allele for rs1130409 (OR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.81, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION Genetic variation in the DNA repair pathway genes may play a significant role in the risk of developing radiation pneumonitis in patients with lung cancer. Further studies are needed on genotypic features of DNA repair pathway genes and their association with treatment sensitivity, as such knowledge may guide personalized radiation dose prescription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W S Yiu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - T S M Chu
- School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom; Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, United Kingdom
| | - Y Meng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - F-M Spring Kong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Lima MC, de Castro CC, Aguiar KEC, Monte N, da Costa Nunes GG, da Costa ACA, Rodrigues JCG, Guerreiro JF, Ribeiro-dos-Santos Â, de Assumpção PP, Burbano RMR, Fernandes MR, dos Santos SEB, dos Santos NPC. Molecular Profile of Important Genes for Radiogenomics in the Amazon Indigenous Population. J Pers Med 2024; 14:484. [PMID: 38793065 PMCID: PMC11122349 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 04/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is focused on the tumor but also reaches healthy tissues, causing toxicities that are possibly related to genomic factors. In this context, radiogenomics can help reduce the toxicity, increase the effectiveness of radiotherapy, and personalize treatment. It is important to consider the genomic profiles of populations not yet studied in radiogenomics, such as the indigenous Amazonian population. Thus, our objective was to analyze important genes for radiogenomics, such as ATM, TGFB1, RAD51, AREG, XRCC4, CDK1, MEG3, PRKCE, TANC1, and KDR, in indigenous people and draw a radiogenomic profile of this population. The NextSeq 500® platform was used for sequencing reactions; for differences in the allelic frequency between populations, Fisher's Exact Test was used. We identified 39 variants, 2 of which were high impact: 1 in KDR (rs41452948) and another in XRCC4 (rs1805377). We found four modifying variants not yet described in the literature in PRKCE. We did not find any variants in TANC1-an important gene for personalized medicine in radiotherapy-that were associated with toxicities in previous cohorts, configuring a protective factor for indigenous people. We identified four SNVs (rs664143, rs1801516, rs1870377, rs1800470) that were associated with toxicity in previous studies. Knowing the radiogenomic profile of indigenous people can help personalize their radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Cardoso de Lima
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (M.C.d.L.); (C.C.d.C.); (K.E.C.A.); (N.M.); (G.G.d.C.N.); (A.C.A.d.C.); (J.C.G.R.); (J.F.G.); (P.P.d.A.); (R.M.R.B.); (M.R.F.)
| | - Cinthia Costa de Castro
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (M.C.d.L.); (C.C.d.C.); (K.E.C.A.); (N.M.); (G.G.d.C.N.); (A.C.A.d.C.); (J.C.G.R.); (J.F.G.); (P.P.d.A.); (R.M.R.B.); (M.R.F.)
| | - Kaio Evandro Cardoso Aguiar
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (M.C.d.L.); (C.C.d.C.); (K.E.C.A.); (N.M.); (G.G.d.C.N.); (A.C.A.d.C.); (J.C.G.R.); (J.F.G.); (P.P.d.A.); (R.M.R.B.); (M.R.F.)
| | - Natasha Monte
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (M.C.d.L.); (C.C.d.C.); (K.E.C.A.); (N.M.); (G.G.d.C.N.); (A.C.A.d.C.); (J.C.G.R.); (J.F.G.); (P.P.d.A.); (R.M.R.B.); (M.R.F.)
| | - Giovanna Gilioli da Costa Nunes
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (M.C.d.L.); (C.C.d.C.); (K.E.C.A.); (N.M.); (G.G.d.C.N.); (A.C.A.d.C.); (J.C.G.R.); (J.F.G.); (P.P.d.A.); (R.M.R.B.); (M.R.F.)
| | - Ana Caroline Alves da Costa
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (M.C.d.L.); (C.C.d.C.); (K.E.C.A.); (N.M.); (G.G.d.C.N.); (A.C.A.d.C.); (J.C.G.R.); (J.F.G.); (P.P.d.A.); (R.M.R.B.); (M.R.F.)
| | - Juliana Carla Gomes Rodrigues
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (M.C.d.L.); (C.C.d.C.); (K.E.C.A.); (N.M.); (G.G.d.C.N.); (A.C.A.d.C.); (J.C.G.R.); (J.F.G.); (P.P.d.A.); (R.M.R.B.); (M.R.F.)
| | - João Farias Guerreiro
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (M.C.d.L.); (C.C.d.C.); (K.E.C.A.); (N.M.); (G.G.d.C.N.); (A.C.A.d.C.); (J.C.G.R.); (J.F.G.); (P.P.d.A.); (R.M.R.B.); (M.R.F.)
- Laboratory of Human and Medical Genetics, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, PA, Brazil;
| | | | - Paulo Pimentel de Assumpção
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (M.C.d.L.); (C.C.d.C.); (K.E.C.A.); (N.M.); (G.G.d.C.N.); (A.C.A.d.C.); (J.C.G.R.); (J.F.G.); (P.P.d.A.); (R.M.R.B.); (M.R.F.)
| | - Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (M.C.d.L.); (C.C.d.C.); (K.E.C.A.); (N.M.); (G.G.d.C.N.); (A.C.A.d.C.); (J.C.G.R.); (J.F.G.); (P.P.d.A.); (R.M.R.B.); (M.R.F.)
| | - Marianne Rodrigues Fernandes
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (M.C.d.L.); (C.C.d.C.); (K.E.C.A.); (N.M.); (G.G.d.C.N.); (A.C.A.d.C.); (J.C.G.R.); (J.F.G.); (P.P.d.A.); (R.M.R.B.); (M.R.F.)
| | - Sidney Emanuel Batista dos Santos
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (M.C.d.L.); (C.C.d.C.); (K.E.C.A.); (N.M.); (G.G.d.C.N.); (A.C.A.d.C.); (J.C.G.R.); (J.F.G.); (P.P.d.A.); (R.M.R.B.); (M.R.F.)
- Laboratory of Human and Medical Genetics, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, PA, Brazil;
| | - Ney Pereira Carneiro dos Santos
- Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (M.C.d.L.); (C.C.d.C.); (K.E.C.A.); (N.M.); (G.G.d.C.N.); (A.C.A.d.C.); (J.C.G.R.); (J.F.G.); (P.P.d.A.); (R.M.R.B.); (M.R.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zureick AH, Zakalik D, Quinn TJ, Rangarajan TS, Grzywacz VP, Rotenbakh LR, Chen PY, Dilworth JT. Breast Irradiation Is Well Tolerated in Carriers of a Pathogenic ATM Variant. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e29-e39. [PMID: 37742832 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are mixed and limited data regarding radiation therapy (RT) tolerance in carriers of a germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) ATM variant. We investigated RT-related toxic effects in carriers of an ATM variant who received treatment for breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified 71 patients treated with adjuvant RT for breast cancer who were carriers of a variant in ATM: 15 were classified as P/LP and 56 classified as variants of unknown significance (VUS). We additionally identified 205 consecutively treated patients during a similar timeframe who were either confirmed ATM wild type or had no prior genetic testing. RT plans were reviewed. Acute and chronic toxic effects were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 criteria. Fisher's exact tests for count data were performed to compare toxic effects between the cohorts (P/LP vs VUS vs control). Wilcoxon rank-sum testing was performed to assess for differences in patient characteristics. RESULTS The median toxicity follow-up was 19.4 months; median follow-up for the subcohorts was 13.3 months (P/LP), 12.6 months (VUS), and 23.3 months (control). There were no significant differences in radiation plan heterogeneity, receipt of a boost, or size of breast/chest wall planning target volume. There was greater use of hypofractionated RT in the control cohort (P = .023). After accounting for patient- and treatment-related factors that may affect toxic effects, we found no significant differences with respect to acute dermatitis, hyperpigmentation, moist desquamation, breast/chest wall pain, or breast edema. Additionally, we found no significant differences with respect to chronic breast/chest wall pain, induration, telangiectasia, or cosmetic outcome. CONCLUSIONS RT as part of the management of breast cancer was well tolerated in carriers of a P/LP ATM variant, with toxic effect profiles that were similar to those seen in patients without known ATM mutations. High rates of excellent or good cosmesis were observed in carriers of a P/LP ATM variant who underwent breast conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew H Zureick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Dana Zakalik
- Nancy and James Grosfeld Cancer Genetics Center, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Oakland University, William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan
| | - Thomas J Quinn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Tara S Rangarajan
- Nancy and James Grosfeld Cancer Genetics Center, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Vincent P Grzywacz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Leah R Rotenbakh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oakland University, William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan
| | - Peter Y Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Oakland University, William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan
| | - Joshua T Dilworth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Oakland University, William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hernandez-Martinez JM, Rosell R, Arrieta O. Somatic and germline ATM variants in non-small-cell lung cancer: Therapeutic implications. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023:104058. [PMID: 37343657 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
ATM is an apical kinase of the DNA damage response involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Germline ATM variants (gATM) have been associated with an increased risk of developing lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and approximately 9% of LUAD tumors harbor somatic ATM mutations (sATM). Biallelic carriers of pathogenic gATM exhibit a plethora of immunological abnormalities, but few studies have evaluated the contribution of immune dysfunction to lung cancer susceptibility. Indeed, little is known about the clinicopathological characteristics of lung cancer patients with sATM or gATM alterations. The introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapies, and the increasing number of clinical trials evaluating treatment combinations, warrants a careful reexamination of the benefits and harms that different therapeutic approaches have had in lung cancer patients with sATM or gATM. This review will discuss the role of ATM in the pathogenesis of lung cancer, highlighting potential therapeutic approaches to manage ATM-deficient lung cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan-Manuel Hernandez-Martinez
- Thoracic Oncology Unit and Experimental Oncology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de México (INCan); CONACYT-Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Rafael Rosell
- Institut d'Investigació en Ciències Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; (4)Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Oscar Arrieta
- Thoracic Oncology Unit and Experimental Oncology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de México (INCan).
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Genetic Considerations in the Locoregional Management of Breast Cancer: a Review of Current Evidence. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-023-00478-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|
6
|
Deichaite I, Hopper A, Krockenberger L, Sears TJ, Sutton L, Ray X, Sharabi A, Navon A, Sanghvi P, Carter H, Moiseenko V. Germline genetic biomarkers to stratify patients for personalized radiation treatment. J Transl Med 2022; 20:360. [PMID: 35962345 PMCID: PMC9373374 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03561-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Precision medicine incorporating genetic profiling is becoming a standard of care in medical oncology. However, in the field of radiation oncology there is limited use of genetic profiling and the impact of germline genetic biomarkers on radiosensitivity, radioresistance, or patient outcomes after radiation therapy is poorly understood. In HNSCC, the toxicity associated with treatment can cause delays or early cessation which has been associated with worse outcomes. Identifying potential biomarkers which can help predict toxicity, as well as response to treatment, is of significant interest. Methods Patients with HNSCC who received RT and underwent next generation sequencing of somatic tumor samples, transcriptome RNA-seq with matched normal tissue samples were included. Patients were then grouped by propensity towards increased late vs. early toxicity (Group A) and those without (Group B), assessed by CTCAE v5.0. The groups were then analyzed for association of specific germline variants with toxicity and clinical outcomes. Results In this study we analyzed 37 patients for correlation between germline variants and toxicity. We observed that TSC2, HLA-A, TET2, GEN1, NCOR2 and other germline variants were significantly associated with long term toxicities. 34 HNSCC patients treated with curative intent were evaluated for clinical outcomes. Group A had significantly improved overall survival as well as improved rates of locoregional recurrence and metastatic disease. Specific variants associated with improved clinical outcomes included TSC2, FANCD2, and PPP1R15A, while the HLA-A and GEN1 variants were not correlated with survival or recurrence. A group of five HLA-DMA/HLA-DMB variants was only found in Group B and was associated with a higher risk of locoregional recurrence. Conclusions This study indicates that germline genetic biomarkers may have utility in predicting toxicity and outcomes after radiation therapy and deserve further investigation in precision radiation medicine approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Deichaite
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. .,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| | - Austin Hopper
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Lena Krockenberger
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Timothy J Sears
- Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Leisa Sutton
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Xenia Ray
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Andrew Sharabi
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ami Navon
- Department of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Parag Sanghvi
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Hannah Carter
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Vitali Moiseenko
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lazzari G, Buono G, Zannino B, Silvano G. Breast Cancer Adjuvant Radiotherapy in BRCA1/2, TP53, ATM Genes Mutations: Are There Solved Issues? BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY 2021; 13:299-310. [PMID: 34012291 PMCID: PMC8126701 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s306075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53 and ATM gene mutations are the most studied tumour suppressor genes (TSGs) influencing the loco-regional approach to breast cancer (BC). Due to altered radio sensitivity of mutated cancer cells, mastectomy has always been advised in most patients with BC linked to TSGs mutations in order to avoid or minimize the use of adjuvant radiotherapy (ART). Whether ART is safe or not in these carriers is still debated. As a result, this issue has been widely discussed in the recent ASTRO and ASCO papers, yielding important and useful recommendations on the use of ART according to the mutational status. In this review, we have highlighted the impact of these mutations on local control, toxicities, second tumors, and contralateral breast cancers (CBCs) after ART to solve remaining doubts and encourage the safe use of ART when indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grazia Lazzari
- Radiation Oncology Unit, San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Taranto, 74100, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Buono
- Medical Oncology Unit, San Rocco Hospital, Sessa Aurunca, Caserta, 81037, Italy
| | - Benedetto Zannino
- Medical Oncology Unit, San Rocco Hospital, Sessa Aurunca, Caserta, 81037, Italy
| | - Giovanni Silvano
- Radiation Oncology Unit, San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Taranto, 74100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lumniczky K, Impens N, Armengol G, Candéias S, Georgakilas AG, Hornhardt S, Martin OA, Rödel F, Schaue D. Low dose ionizing radiation effects on the immune system. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 149:106212. [PMID: 33293042 PMCID: PMC8784945 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Ionizing radiation interacts with the immune system in many ways with a multiplicity that mirrors the complexity of the immune system itself: namely the need to maintain a delicate balance between different compartments, cells and soluble factors that work collectively to protect, maintain, and restore tissue function in the face of severe challenges including radiation damage. The cytotoxic effects of high dose radiation are less relevant after low dose exposure, where subtle quantitative and functional effects predominate that may go unnoticed until late after exposure or after a second challenge reveals or exacerbates the effects. For example, low doses may permanently alter immune fitness and therefore accelerate immune senescence and pave the way for a wide spectrum of possible pathophysiological events, including early-onset of age-related degenerative disorders and cancer. By contrast, the so called low dose radiation therapy displays beneficial, anti-inflammatory and pain relieving properties in chronic inflammatory and degenerative diseases. In this review, epidemiological, clinical and experimental data regarding the effects of low-dose radiation on the homeostasis and functional integrity of immune cells will be discussed, as will be the role of immune-mediated mechanisms in the systemic manifestation of localized exposures such as inflammatory reactions. The central conclusion is that ionizing radiation fundamentally and durably reshapes the immune system. Further, the importance of discovery of immunological pathways for modifying radiation resilience amongst other research directions in this field is implied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katalin Lumniczky
- National Public Health Centre, Department of Radiation Medicine, Budapest, Albert Florian u. 2-6, 1097, Hungary.
| | - Nathalie Impens
- Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Biosciences Expert Group, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
| | - Gemma Armengol
- Unit of Biological Anthropology, Department of Animal Biology, Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biosciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193-Bellaterra, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
| | - Serge Candéias
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, CEA, CNRS, IRIG-LCBM, 38000 Grenoble, France.
| | - Alexandros G Georgakilas
- DNA Damage Laboratory, Physics Department, School of Applied Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), Zografou 15780, Athens, Greece.
| | - Sabine Hornhardt
- Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Ingolstaedter Landstr.1, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.
| | - Olga A Martin
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Franz Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Dörthe Schaue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095-1714, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Díaz-Gavela AA, Del Cerro Peñalver E, Sanchez García S, Leonardo Guerrero L, Sanz Rosa D, Couñago Lorenzo F. Breast cancer radiotherapy: What physicians need to know in the era of the precision medicine. Breast Dis 2021; 40:1-16. [PMID: 33554881 DOI: 10.3233/bd-201022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide and encompasses a broad spectrum of diseases in one with significant epidemiological, clinical, and biological heterogeneity, which determines a different natural history and prognostic profile. Although classical tumour staging (TNM) still provides valuable information, the current reality is that the clinicians must consider other biological and molecular factors that directly influence treatment decision-making. The management of breast cancer has changed radically in the last 15 years due to significant advances in our understanding of these tumours. This knowledge has brought with it a major impact regarding surgical and systemic management and has been practice-changing, but it has also created significant uncertainties regarding how best integrate the radiotherapy treatment into the therapeutic scheme. In parallel, radiotherapy itself has also experienced major advances, new radiobiological concepts have emerged, and genomic data and other patient-specific factors must now be integrated into individualised treatment approaches. In this context, "precision medicine" seeks to provide an answer to these open questions and uncertainties. The aim of the present review is to clarify the meaning of this term and to critically evaluate its role and impact on contemporary breast cancer radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Aurora Díaz-Gavela
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Department, Faculty of Biomedicine, Universidad Europea, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elia Del Cerro Peñalver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Department, Faculty of Biomedicine, Universidad Europea, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sofía Sanchez García
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Leonardo Guerrero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Sanz Rosa
- Clinical Department, Faculty of Biomedicine, Universidad Europea, Madrid, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago Lorenzo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Department, Faculty of Biomedicine, Universidad Europea, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jiang M, Yang J, Li K, Liu J, Jing X, Tang M. Insights into the theranostic value of precision medicine on advanced radiotherapy to breast cancer. Int J Med Sci 2021; 18:626-638. [PMID: 33437197 PMCID: PMC7797538 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.49544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. "Breast cancer" encompasses a broad spectrum of diseases (i.e., subtypes) with significant epidemiological, clinical, and biological heterogeneity. Each of these subtypes has a different natural history and prognostic profile. Although tumour staging (TNM classification) still provides valuable information in the overall management of breast cancer, the current reality is that clinicians must consider other biological and molecular factors that directly influence treatment decision-making, including extent of surgery, indication for chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and even radiotherapy (and treatment volumes). The management of breast cancer has changed radically in the last 15 years due to significant advances in our understanding of these tumours. While these changes have been extremely positive in terms of surgical and systemic management, they have also created significant uncertainties concerning integration of local and locoregional radiotherapy into the therapeutic scheme. In parallel, radiotherapy itself has also experienced major advances. Beyond the evident technological advances, new radiobiological concepts have emerged, and genomic data and other patient-specific factors must now be integrated into individualized treatment approaches. In this context, "precision medicine" seeks to provide an answer to these open questions and uncertainties. Although precision medicine has been much discussed in the last five years or so, the concept remains somewhat ambiguous, and it often appear to be used as a "catch-all" term. The present review aims to clarify the meaning of this term and, more importantly, to critically evaluate the role and impact of precision medicine on breast cancer radiotherapy. Finally, we will discuss the current and future of precision medicine in radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Man Jiang
- 3 rd Affiliated Hospital of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518172, China.,Department of Oncology, Longgang District People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518172, China
| | - Jianshe Yang
- 3 rd Affiliated Hospital of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518172, China
| | - Kang Li
- 3 rd Affiliated Hospital of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518172, China
| | - Jia Liu
- 3 rd Affiliated Hospital of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518172, China
| | - Xigang Jing
- Medical College of Wisconsin (Milwaukee), Wisconsin 53226, USA
| | - Meiqin Tang
- 3 rd Affiliated Hospital of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518172, China.,Department of Hematology, Longgang District People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518172, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Association between NF- κB Activation in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Late Skin and Subcutaneous Fibrosis following Radiotherapy. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2020; 2020:2957818. [PMID: 32775415 PMCID: PMC7391119 DOI: 10.1155/2020/2957818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background This study aimed at evaluating the association between the speed of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) activation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and late skin and subcutaneous fibrosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after radiotherapy. Methods The speed of NF-κB activation was represented by the nuclear p65 expression ratio before and after irradiation. The optimal time point to measure the ratio was determined by Western blot in the PBMCs from healthy outpatients ranging from 0 to 12 hours after ex vivo irradiation. We recruited patients with HNSCC who had received ratiotherapy and who were under regular follow-up care. We assessed the association between the risk of developing ≥grade 2 late fibrosis and the nuclear p65 expression ratio in the PBMCs after ex vivo irradiation in these patients. Results The maximum nuclear p65 ratio was observed at 1 hour after ex vivo irradiation in the PBMCs from the healthy outpatients. The speed of NF-κB activation was then represented by the nuclear p65 ratio in the PBMCs before and 1 hour after ex vivo irradiation. A total of 200 patients with HNSCC were recruited, 32.50% (n = 65) of which presented with ≥grade 2 late fibrosis. There was a significant association between the speed of NF-κB activation in the PBMCs and an increased risk of developing ≥grade 2 late fibrosis in these patients (P = 0.004). Subgroup analysis suggested that this finding was independent of the known clinical characteristics. Conclusions The speed of NF-κB activation might be a potential predictor of late toxicity in cancer patients after radiotherapy. Prospective studies are needed for validation.
Collapse
|
12
|
Li Y, Shi P, Jiang D. Polymorphism rs1801516 (G > A) in the ATM gene is not associated with overall cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 2020; 48:300060520937618. [PMID: 32674635 PMCID: PMC7370572 DOI: 10.1177/0300060520937618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene contains a functional single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs1801516 (G > A) that may be associated with cancer risk. This meta-analysis aimed to interrogate the relationship between rs1801516 and cancer occurrence and disease etiology. Methods We retrieved and identified the available case–control studies that met the inclusion criteria from the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to measure the association between rs1801516 and cancer risk. Additionally, we performed sensitivity, subgroup, and publication bias analyses. Results After inclusion criteria were met, the meta-analysis included 29 studies, with 9,453 cancer patients (cases) and 14,646 controls. No association was found between rs1801516 and cancer risk (pooled OR = 0.911; 95% CI, 0.740–1.123). Concordantly, no association was found between rs1801516 and cancer risk after subgroup analysis by source of controls, cancer type, or ethnicity, which confirmed the finding of the dominant model that this SNP is not involved in the occurrence of cancer. Conclusions Through this meta-analysis, we found no association between rs1801516 and cancer occurrence as a risk factor. These data provide useful information for future case–control studies on cancer etiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yueting Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, P.R. China
| | - Pengxu Shi
- Department of Bone Surgery, People's Hospital of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, P.R. China
| | - Daqing Jiang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Haffty BG, Euhus DM, Pierce LJ. Genetic Factors in the Locoregional Management of Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2220-2229. [PMID: 32442063 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - David M Euhus
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lori J Pierce
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Terrazzino S, Cargnin S, Deantonio L, Pisani C, Masini L, Canonico PL, Genazzani AA, Krengli M. Impact of ATM rs1801516 on late skin reactions of radiotherapy for breast cancer: Evidences from a cohort study and a trial sequential meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0225685. [PMID: 31756226 PMCID: PMC6874351 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The relationship between the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) rs1801516 gene polymorphism and risk of radiation-induced late skin side effects remains a highly debated issue. In the present study, we assessed the role of ATM rs1801516 as risk factor for radiation-induced fibrosis and telangiectasia, using the LENT-SOMA scoring scale in 285 breast cancer patients who received radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery. A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was then conducted to assess reliability of the accumulated evidence in breast cancer patients. In our cohort study, no association was found between ATM rs1801516 and grade ≥ 2 telangiectasia (GA+AA vs GG, HRadjusted: 0.699; 95%CI: 0.273–1.792, P = 0.459) or grade ≥ 2 fibrosis (GA+AA vs GG, HRadjusted: 1.175; 95%CI: 0.641–2.154, P = 0.604). Twelve independent cohorts of breast cancer patients were identified through the systematic review, of which 11 and 9 cohorts focused respectively on the association with radiation-induced fibrosis and radiation-induced telangiectasia. Pooled analyses of 10 (n = 2928 patients) and 12 (n = 2783) cohorts revealed, respectively, no association of ATM rs1801516 with radiation-induced telangiectasia (OR: 1.14; 95%CI: 0.88–1.48, P = 0.316) and a significant correlation with radiation-induced fibrosis (OR: 1.23; 95%CI: 1.00–1.51, P = 0.049), which however did not remain significant after TSA adjustment (TSA-adjusted 95%CI: 0.85–1.78). These results do not support an impact of ATM rs1801516 on late skin reactions of radiotherapy for breast cancer, nevertheless further large studies are still required for conclusive evidences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Terrazzino
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Centro di Ricerca Interdipartimentale di Farmacogenetica e Farmacogenomica (CRIFF), University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- * E-mail:
| | - Sarah Cargnin
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Centro di Ricerca Interdipartimentale di Farmacogenetica e Farmacogenomica (CRIFF), University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Letizia Deantonio
- Radiation Oncology Clinic, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona-Lugano, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Carla Pisani
- Radiotherapy, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Laura Masini
- Radiotherapy, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Pier Luigi Canonico
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Centro di Ricerca Interdipartimentale di Farmacogenetica e Farmacogenomica (CRIFF), University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Armando A. Genazzani
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Centro di Ricerca Interdipartimentale di Farmacogenetica e Farmacogenomica (CRIFF), University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Marco Krengli
- Radiotherapy, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bergom C, West CM, Higginson DS, Abazeed ME, Arun B, Bentzen SM, Bernstein JL, Evans JD, Gerber NK, Kerns SL, Keen J, Litton JK, Reiner AS, Riaz N, Rosenstein BS, Sawakuchi GO, Shaitelman SF, Powell SN, Woodward WA. The Implications of Genetic Testing on Radiation Therapy Decisions: A Guide for Radiation Oncologists. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:698-712. [PMID: 31381960 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The advent of affordable and rapid next-generation DNA sequencing technology, along with the US Supreme Court ruling invalidating gene patents, has led to a deluge of germline and tumor genetic variant tests that are being rapidly incorporated into clinical cancer decision-making. A major concern for clinicians is whether the presence of germline mutations may increase the risk of radiation toxicity or secondary malignancies. Because scarce clinical data exist to inform decisions at this time, the American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a group of radiation science experts and clinicians to summarize potential issues, review relevant data, and provide guidance for adult patients and their care teams regarding the impact, if any, that genetic testing should have on radiation therapy recommendations. During the American Society for Radiation Oncology workshop, several main points emerged, which are discussed in this manuscript: (1) variants of uncertain significance should be considered nondeleterious until functional genomic data emerge to demonstrate otherwise; (2) possession of germline alterations in a single copy of a gene critical for radiation damage responses does not necessarily equate to increased risk of radiation-induced toxicity; (3) deleterious ataxia-telangiesctasia gene mutations may modestly increase second cancer risk after radiation therapy, and thus follow-up for these patients after indicated radiation therapy should include second cancer screening; (4) conveying to patients the difference between relative and absolute risk is critical to decision-making; and (5) more work is needed to assess the impact of tumor somatic alterations on the probability of response to radiation therapy and the potential for individualization of radiation doses. Data on radiosensitivity related to specific genetic mutations is also briefly discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Bergom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Catharine M West
- Division of Cancer Sciences, National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Daniel S Higginson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mohamed E Abazeed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Translational Hematology Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Banu Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Soren M Bentzen
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jonine L Bernstein
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jaden D Evans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology and Precision Genomics, Intermountain Healthcare, Ogden, Utah
| | - Naamit K Gerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Sarah L Kerns
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Judy Keen
- Scientific Affairs, American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Jennifer K Litton
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anne S Reiner
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Barry S Rosenstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Gabriel O Sawakuchi
- Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Simona F Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Simon N Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Wendy A Woodward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rajaraman P, Hauptmann M, Bouffler S, Wojcik A. Human individual radiation sensitivity and prospects for prediction. Ann ICRP 2018; 47:126-141. [PMID: 29648458 DOI: 10.1177/0146645318764091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
In the past few decades, it has become increasingly evident that sensitivity to ionising radiation is variable. This is true for tissue reactions (deterministic effects) after high doses of radiation, for stochastic effects following moderate and possibly low doses, and conceivably also for non-cancer effects such as cardiovascular disease, the causal pathway(s) of which are not yet fully understood. A high sensitivity to deterministic effects is not necessarily correlated with a high sensitivity to stochastic effects. The concept of individual sensitivity to high and low doses of radiation has long been supported by data from patients with certain rare hereditary conditions. However, these syndromes only affect a small proportion of the general population. More relevant to the majority of the population is the notion that some part of the genetic contribution defining radiation sensitivity may follow a polygenic model, which predicts elevated risk resulting from the inheritance of many low-penetrance risk-modulating alleles. Can the different forms of individual radiation sensitivities be inferred from the reaction of cells exposed ex vivo to ionising radiation? Can they be inferred from analyses of individual genotypes? This paper reviews current evidence from studies of late adverse tissue reactions after radiotherapy in potentially sensitive groups, including data from functional assays, candidate gene approaches, and genome-wide association studies. It focuses on studies published in 2013 or later because a comprehensive review of earlier studies was published previously in a report by the UK Advisory Group on Ionising Radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - M Hauptmann
- b Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands
| | | | - A Wojcik
- d Centre for Radiation Protection Research, MBW Department, Stockholm University, Sweden.,e Jan Kochanowski University, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhao Y, Yang L, Wu D, He H, Wang M, Ge T, Liu Y, Tian H, Cui J, Jia L, Wan Z, Han F. Gene-environment interaction for polymorphisms in ataxia telangiectasia-mutated gene and radiation exposure in carcinogenesis: results from two literature-based meta-analyses of 27120 participants. Oncotarget 2018; 7:76867-76881. [PMID: 27764772 PMCID: PMC5363555 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We conducted two meta-analyses of ATM genetic polymorphisms and cancer risk in individuals with or without radiation exposure to determine whether there was a joint effect between the ATM gene and radiation exposure in carcinogenesis. Results rs1801516, which was the only ATM polymorphism investigated by more than 3 studies of radiation exposure, was eligible for the present study. The meta-analysis of 23333 individuals without radiation exposure from 24 studies showed no association between the rs1801516 polymorphism and cancer risk, without heterogeneity across studies. The meta-analysis of 3787 individuals with radiation exposure from 6 studies showed a significant association between the rs1801516 polymorphism and a decreased cancer risk, with heterogeneity across studies. There was a borderline-significant difference between the ORs of the two meta-analyses (P = 0.066), and the difference was significant when only Caucasians were included (P = 0.011). Materials and methods Publications were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CNKI databases. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to estimate the association between ATM genetic polymorphisms and cancer risk. Tests of interaction were used to compare differences between the ORs of the two meta-analyses. Conclusions Our meta-analyses confirmed the presence of a gene-environment interaction between the rs1801516 polymorphism and radiation exposure in carcinogenesis, whereas no association was found between the rs1801516 polymorphism and cancer risk for individuals without radiation exposure. The heterogeneity observed in the meta-analysis of individuals with radiation exposure might be due to gene-ethnicity or gene-gene interactions. Further studies are needed to elucidate sources of the heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuguang Zhao
- Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Lei Yang
- Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Di Wu
- Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Hua He
- Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Mengmeng Wang
- Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Tingwen Ge
- Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yudi Liu
- Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Huimin Tian
- Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jiuwei Cui
- Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Lin Jia
- Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Ziqiang Wan
- Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Fujun Han
- Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Andreassen CN, Rosenstein BS, Kerns SL, Ostrer H, De Ruysscher D, Cesaretti JA, Barnett GC, Dunning AM, Dorling L, West CML, Burnet NG, Elliott R, Coles C, Hall E, Fachal L, Vega A, Gómez-Caamaño A, Talbot CJ, Symonds RP, De Ruyck K, Thierens H, Ost P, Chang-Claude J, Seibold P, Popanda O, Overgaard M, Dearnaley D, Sydes MR, Azria D, Koch CA, Parliament M, Blackshaw M, Sia M, Fuentes-Raspall MJ, Ramon Y Cajal T, Barnadas A, Vesprini D, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, Mollà M, Díez O, Yarnold JR, Overgaard J, Bentzen SM, Alsner J. Individual patient data meta-analysis shows a significant association between the ATM rs1801516 SNP and toxicity after radiotherapy in 5456 breast and prostate cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 2016; 121:431-439. [PMID: 27443449 PMCID: PMC5559879 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Revised: 06/18/2016] [Accepted: 06/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Several small studies have indicated that the ATM rs1801516 SNP is associated with risk of normal tissue toxicity after radiotherapy. However, the findings have not been consistent. In order to test this SNP in a well-powered study, an individual patient data meta-analysis was carried out by the International Radiogenomics Consortium. MATERIALS AND METHODS The analysis included 5456 patients from 17 different cohorts. 2759 patients were given radiotherapy for breast cancer and 2697 for prostate cancer. Eight toxicity scores (overall toxicity, acute toxicity, late toxicity, acute skin toxicity, acute rectal toxicity, telangiectasia, fibrosis and late rectal toxicity) were analyzed. Adjustments were made for treatment and patient related factors with potential impact on the risk of toxicity. RESULTS For all endpoints except late rectal toxicity, a significantly increased risk of toxicity was found for carriers of the minor (Asn) allele with odds ratios of approximately 1.5 for acute toxicity and 1.2 for late toxicity. The results were consistent with a co-dominant pattern of inheritance. CONCLUSION This study convincingly showed a significant association between the ATM rs1801516 Asn allele and increased risk of radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Barry S Rosenstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Sarah L Kerns
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Harry Ostrer
- Departments of Pathology and Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiotherapy (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gillian C Barnett
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Leila Dorling
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Catharine M L West
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Neil G Burnet
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Rebecca Elliott
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Charlotte Coles
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Emma Hall
- Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Laura Fachal
- Fundacion Publica Galega de Medicina Xenomica-SERGAS, Grupo de Medicina Xenomica-USC, IDIS, CIBERER, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Ana Vega
- Fundacion Publica Galega de Medicina Xenomica-SERGAS, Grupo de Medicina Xenomica-USC, IDIS, CIBERER, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Antonio Gómez-Caamaño
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | - R Paul Symonds
- Department of Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, UK
| | - Kim De Ruyck
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Hubert Thierens
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University Cancer Center Hamburg, University (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Petra Seibold
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Odilia Popanda
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marie Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - David Dearnaley
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - David Azria
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Institut regional du Cancer Montpellier, France
| | - Christine Anne Koch
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Matthew Parliament
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Michael Blackshaw
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Michael Sia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Abbotsford Clinic, Canada
| | | | - Teresa Ramon Y Cajal
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Agustin Barnadas
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez
- Oncogenetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Meritxell Mollà
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Orland Díez
- Oncogenetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Area of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - John R Yarnold
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Greenebaum Cancer Center and Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Jan Alsner
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|