Anti-TNFα therapy for chronic inflammatory disease in kidney transplant recipients: Clinical outcomes

AA Amyloidosis: A Contemporary View

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis is an organ- or life-threatening complication of chronic inflammatory disorders. Here, we review the epidemiology, causes, pathogenesis, clinical features, and diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of AA amyloidosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of AA amyloidosis has declined due to better treatment of the underlying diseases. Histopathological examination is the gold standard of diagnosis, but magnetic resonance imaging can be used to detect cardiac involvement. There is yet no treatment option for the clearance of amyloid fibril deposits; therefore, the management strategy primarily aims to reduce serum amyloid A protein. Anti-inflammatory biologic agents have drastically expanded our therapeutic armamentarium. Kidney transplantation is preferred in patients with kidney failure, and the recurrence of amyloidosis in the allograft has become rare as transplant recipients have started to benefit from the new agents. The management of AA amyloidosis has been considerably changed over the recent years due to the novel therapeutic options aiming to control inflammatory activity. New agents capable of clearing amyloid deposits from the tissues are still needed.

Infections in the era of immunobiologicals

Immunobiologicals represent an innovative therapeutic option in dermatology. They are indicated in severe and refractory cases of different diseases when there is contraindication, intolerance, or failure of conventional systemic therapy and in cases with significant impairment of patient quality of life. The main immunobiologicals used in dermatology basically include inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF), inhibitors of interleukin-12 and -23 (anti-IL12/23), inhibitors of interleukin-17 and its receptor (anti-IL17), inhibitors of interleukin-23 (anti-IL23), rituximab (anti-CD20 antibody), dupilumab (anti-IL4/IL13) and intravenous immunoglobulin. Their immunomodulatory action may be associated with an increase in the risk of infections in the short and long term, and each case must be assessed individually, according to the risk inherent to the drug, the patient general condition, and the need for precautions. This article will discuss the main risks of infection associated with the use of immunobiologicals, addressing the risk in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients, vaccination, fungal infections, tuberculosis, leprosy, and viral hepatitis, and how to manage the patient in the most diverse scenarios.

Is low-dose tumor necrosis factor inhibitor effective and safe in patients with ankylosing spondylitis flare-up after renal transplantation? A case report and literature review

Rheumatic diseases, the immunosuppressant drugs used after solid organ transplantation to prevent graft rejection, and the biologics used for controlling rheumatic disease, especially tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi)-all of these could increase the risk of malignancy. The roles of biologics for disease control in rheumatic disease patients after kidney transplantation (KT) are not well established because only a few cases are reported, and the possibility of increasing infection and malignancy rates. Here, we present the first case of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) successfully treated with low-dose TNFi for disease activity flare-up 5 months after KT and review the literature to see whether the use of biologics, especially TNFi, in AS patients with disease activity flare-ups after receiving KT is effective and safe.

Steroid refractory severe ulcerative colitis after kidney transplantation successfully treated with infliximab

A 54-year-old man underwent kidney transplantation at the age of 50 for end-stage renal failure owing to diabetic nephropathy. The patient was subsequently treated with three immunosuppressive drugs (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone) to prevent organ rejection, and no renal failure was noted. He visited our department with bloody stools and diarrhea, and a colonoscopy revealed mucosal edema and redness of the entire colon. After excluding infection and drug-induced enteritis based on the endoscopic and pathological findings, he was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC). He was admitted and received a high dose of steroids, but did not demonstrate improvement. We initiated infliximab (IFX), and his symptoms improved within 3 days. After the second IFX treatment, the patient achieved clinical remission and was discharged. After the third IFX dose, the biomarker level became normal, and a colonoscopy after the fourth IFX dose revealed that all ulcers had become scarred and achieved endoscopic remission. The patient continued all medications to prevent organ rejection after the onset of UC and had no graft dysfunction or infection for 1 year.

Psoriasis in the transplant population

Solid organ and stem cell transplants are increasingly common, and dermatologists will more frequently encounter and need to manage common skin diseases, such as psoriasis, in transplant patients. This review explores psoriasis remission and occurrence in recipients of solid organ and stem cell transplants. Hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cell transplants may show potential for treating psoriasis in patients with leukemia or who have other medical conditions requiring stem cell transplant. The effects of solid organ transplant are less clear, partly due to limitations in the breadth of the literature. De novo psoriasis has been reported in recipients of solid organ transplants, but the reasons for this development have yet to be fully understood. Overall, the literature on this subject is limited to primarily case reports. Feasibility of studies on the subject may be a considerable barrier to further research assessing the use of transplant for treating psoriasis, but there is potential benefit from transplant for psoriasis patients. This subject should receive further exploration to fully understand these benefits.

Leveraging the tolerogenic potential of TNF-α and regulatory B cells in organ transplantation

A subset of B-cells with tolerogenic functions, termed B-regulatory cells or Bregs, is characterized by the expression of anti-inflammatory/tolerogenic cytokines, namely IL-10, TGF-β, and IL-35, that contribute to their regulatory functions. Breg regulation favors graft acceptance within a tolerogenic milieu. As organ transplantation invariably triggers inflammation, new insights into the crosstalk between cytokines with dual properties and the inflamed milieu are needed to tailor their function toward tolerance. Using TNF-α as a proxy of dual-function cytokines involved in immune-related diseases and transplantation settings, the current review highlights the multifaceted role of TNF-α. It focuses on therapeutic approaches that have revealed the complexity of TNF-α properties tested in clinical settings where total TNF-α inhibition has proven ineffective and often detrimental to clinical outcomes. To improve the efficacy of current TNF-α inhibiting therapeutics, we propose a three-prong strategy to upregulate the tolerogenic pathway engaging the TNFR2 receptor while simultaneously inhibiting the inflammatory mechanisms associated with TNFR1 engagement. When combined with additional administrations of Bregs-TLR that activate Tregs, this approach may become a potential therapeutic in overcoming transplant rejection and promoting graft tolerance.

The Signaling Pathway of TNF Receptors: Linking Animal Models of Renal Disease to Human CKD

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been recognized as a global public health problem. Despite the current advances in medicine, CKD-associated morbidity and mortality remain unacceptably high. Several studies have highlighted the contribution of inflammation and inflammatory mediators to the development and/or progression of CKD, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related biomarkers. The inflammation pathway driven by TNF-α, through TNF receptors 1 (TNFR1) and 2 (TNFR2), involves important mediators in the pathogenesis of CKD. Circulating levels of TNFRs were associated with changes in other biomarkers of kidney function and injury, and were described as predictors of disease progression, cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality in several cohorts of patients. Experimental studies describe the possible downstream signaling pathways induced upon TNFR activation and the resulting biological responses. This review will focus on the available data on TNFR1 and TNFR2, and illustrates their contributions to the pathophysiology of kidney diseases, their cellular and molecular roles, as well as their potential as CKD biomarkers. The emerging evidence shows that TNF receptors could act as biomarkers of renal damage and as mediators of the disease. Furthermore, it has been suggested that these biomarkers could significantly improve the discrimination of clinical CKD prognostic models.

Risk of infections in psoriasis: assessment and challenges in daily management

INTRODUCTION

In daily practice management of psoriasis, evaluation of risk factors for infections is having a growing influence. Indeed, in psoriatic patients, risk of infections may be due to psoriasis itself, immunomodulatory therapy, and comorbidities that may increase this risk and patient hospitalization.

AREAS COVERED

Given the greater understanding of psoriasis pathogenesis and the increasing number of treatment options, it is particularly important to customize therapy according to each, single patient; psoriasis features and comorbidities are also essential to tailor treatment goals.

EXPERT OPINION

In this perspective, the current knowledge on the infectious risk in psoriatic patient, related to comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary, to 'special populations,' to chronic infections, such as latent tuberculosis, chronic hepatitis B and C, and HIV, and to the most recent Covid-19 pandemic scenario, is reviewed and discussed in order to suggest the most appropriate approach and achieve the best available therapeutic option.

Safety of biologic treatments in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The development of biological treatments has transformed the management of a broad spectrum of autoimmune/inflammatory diseases. However, little is known about their use in solid-organ transplant recipients. This study aimed to evaluate complications occurring with biologic treatments in solid-organ transplant recipients.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed in the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases, up to 01/10/2020, to identify published case reports or series reporting the use of biologic treatments in solid organ transplant recipients with chronic inflammatory diseases. We collected data on patient characteristics and reported complications.

RESULTS

In total, 57 articles were included, totalling 187 patients (141 liver, 42 kidney, 3 heart, and 1 liver-kidney transplant recipients). Inflammatory bowel diseases represented the most common indication for biologic treatment initiation (80.7%), followed by rheumatic diseases (7.5%), hereditary periodic fever syndromes (5.9%) and psoriasis (4.8%). Anti-TNFα were mainly used (77.5%; mainly monoclonal antibodies (70%) compared to soluble receptor etanercept (7.5%)), followed by the anti-α4β7 integrin, vedolizumab (27.3%) and the anti-IL-1R, anakinra (6.9%). Median treatment duration was 12 months. Infections occurred in 54 patients (28.9%) through 88 recorded events. No therapeutic or demographic factors were associated with occurrence of infection. Sixteen patients (8.6%) developed malignancies, and acute graft rejections occurred in 5 patients (2.7%). Among the 187 patients, 9 deaths were reported (4.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This review assembles the largest number of published reports regarding the use of biological treatments in solid organ transplant recipients, providing data about their safety. Further comparative studies are needed to assess the safety of biological treatments in transplanted patients.

De novo ulcerative colitis after kidney transplantation treated with infliximab

Diarrhea is a common complication in kidney transplant recipients. Common causes of diarrhea include infection, side effect from medication, rejection, and malignancy. A less common but important cause of diarrhea is de novo inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This is unexpected, as these patients are already immunosuppressed. Herein, we present the case of a 45-year-old man with end-stage kidney disease because of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis who underwent preemptive kidney transplantation, with his mother as donor. His immunosuppressive regimen included methylprednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. He had no episodes of graft dysfunction, rejection, or infectious events. Two and a half years post-transplantation, he developed bloody diarrhea. After excluding infections, colonoscopy was performed and revealed edematous mucosa and erythema with pigmentation, which are typical findings in ulcerative colitis. Despite therapy with 5-aminosalicylate and granulocyte monocyte apheresis, he presented with massive bloody diarrhea. We initiated infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) agent. He responded very well and achieved remission within 6 months after initiation of infliximab, while administration of the other immunosuppressants was maintained. His course was uneventful and no complications developed. Management of immunosuppressants for de novo IBD after organ transplantation is complicated, because treatment of IBD, graft function protection, and prevention of infection must be considered. Therefore, cooperation between transplantation physicians and gastroenterologists is essential during therapy.

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

Tumor Necrosis Factor Directs Allograft-Related Innate Responses and Its Neutralization Improves Hepatocyte Engraftment in Rats

The innate immune system plays a critical role in allograft rejection. Alloresponses involve numerous cytokines, chemokines, and receptors that cause tissue injury during rejection. To dissect these inflammatory mechanisms, we developed cell transplantation models in dipeptidylpeptidase-deficient F344 rats using mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus for partial lymphocyte-directed immunosuppression. Syngeneic hepatocytes engrafted in liver, whereas allogeneic hepatocytes were rejected but engrafted after immunosuppression. These transplants induced mRNAs for >40 to 50 cytokines, chemokines, and receptors. In allografts, innate cell type-related regulatory networks extended to granulocytes, monocytes, and macrophages. Activation of Tnfa and its receptors or major chemokine receptor-ligand subsets persisted in the long term. An examination of the contribution of Tnfa in allograft response revealed that it was prospectively antagonized by etanercept or thalidomide, which resolved cytokine, chemokine, and receptor cascades. In bioinformatics analysis of upstream regulator networks, the Cxcl8 pathway exhibited dominance despite immunosuppression. Significantly, Tnfa antagonism silenced the Cxcl8 pathway and decreased neutrophil and Kupffer cell recruitment, resulting in multifold greater engraftment of allogeneic hepatocytes and substantially increased liver repopulation in retrorsine/partial hepatectomy model. We conclude that Tnfa is a major driver for persistent innate immune responses after allogeneic cells. Neutralizing Tnfa should help in avoiding rejection and associated tissue injury in the allograft setting.

Post-transplant colitis after kidney transplantation: clinical, endoscopic and histological features

Chronic immunosuppression may increase the risk of post-transplant infection and medication-related injury and may also be responsible for the increased risk of gastrointestinal complications in kidney transplant recipients. Differentiating the various forms of post-transplant colitis is challenging, since most have similar clinical and histological features. This study evaluated the incidence of post-transplant gastrointestinal complications during screening colonoscopy. Kidney transplant recipients undergoing a colonoscopy for any reasons in the period 2014-2018 were included. Among the 134 patients completing the colonoscopy, 74 patients (56%) had an abnormal finding: an adenoma was found in 25 patients (18.6%), while 19 patients (14.1%) had colitis. Mycophenolic acid/related colitis was the most common colitis (6%), while 7 patients (5.2%) developed a de novo inflammatory bowel disease. Patients with post-transplant colitis were younger and with shorter time from transplant compared to patients without colitis. In conclusions, immunosuppression may predispose kidney transplant recipients to an increased risk of post-transplant colitis. Diagnostic colonoscopy should be encouraged in all transplant patients with refractory diarrhea and gastrointestinal symptoms to allow a prompt diagnosis and a timely treatment, finally improving the quality of life and long-term outcomes of affected patients.

Gastrointestinal complications after kidney transplantation

Gastrointestinal complications are common after renal transplantation, and they have a wide clinical spectrum, varying from diarrhoea to post-transplant inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Chronic immunosuppression may increase the risk of post-transplant infection and medication-related injury and may also be responsible for IBD in kidney transplant re-cipients despite immunosuppression. Differentiating the various forms of post-transplant colitis is challenging, since most have similar clinical and histological features. Drug-related colitis are the most frequently encountered colitis after kidney transplantation, particularly those related to the chronic use of mycophenolate mofetil, while de novo IBDs are quite rare. This review will explore colitis after kidney transplantation, with a particular focus on different clinical and histological features, attempting to clearly identify the right treatment, thereby improving the final outcome of patients.

Incidence and Impacts of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases among Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Meta-Analysis

Background: The incidence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and its significance in kidney transplant recipients is not well established. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the incidence of and complications from IBD in adult kidney transplant recipients. Methods: Eligible articles were searched through Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception through April 2020. The inclusion criteria were adult kidney transplant patients with reported IBD. Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined using the fixed-effects model when I2 ≤ 50% and random-effects model when I2 > 50%. Results: of 641 citations, a total of seven studies (n = 212) were included in the systematic review. The mean age was 46.2 +/− 6.9 years and up to 51.1% were male. The mean duration of follow-up was 57.8 +/− 16.8 months. The pooled incidence of recurrent IBD was 27.6% (95% CI, 17.7–40.5%; I2 0%) while the pooled incidence of de novo IBD was 18.8% (95% CI, 10.7–31.0%; I2 61.3%). The pooled incidence of post-transplant IBD was similar across subgroup analyses. Meta-regression analyses showed no association between the incidence of IBD and age, male sex, and follow-up duration. For post-transplant complications, the pooled incidence of post-transplant infection was 4.7% (95% CI, 0.5–33.3%; I2 73.7%). The pooled incidence of graft rejection and re-transplantation in IBD patients was 31.4% (95% CI, 14.1–56.1%; I2 76.9%) and 30.4% (95% CI, 22.6–39.5%; I2 0%). Conclusion: Recurrent and de novo IBD is common among kidney transplant recipients and may result in adverse outcomes.

Outcomes of Canakinumab Treatment in Recipients of Kidney Transplant With Familial Mediterranean Fever: A Case Series

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an important and preventable cause of chronic kidney disease due to secondary amyloidosis. Although colchicine is the first-line therapy in patients with FMF with 60% to 65% complete remission rates, 5% to 10% of patients are colchicine-resistant and 5% to 10% of them are intolerant to the therapy. Anti-interleukin-1 agents, such as anakinra and canakinumab, are safe and efficient therapeutic options in patients with colchicine resistance or intolerance. However, the data on management of these targeted agents is limited in recipients of kidney transplant (RKT). In this case series, we aim to share our experience on canakinumab therapy of 4 RKTs with FMF-related amyloidosis, who were followed up in our clinic between 2010 and 2017. All of the 4 patients with end-stage renal disease were colchicine- resistant and on other alternative therapies, which provided poor disease control. For efficient control of secondary amyloidosis, canakinumab therapy was initiated in 1 of the patients before the renal transplant, and for the remaining patients after renal transplant. Any serious adverse effect, development of proteinuria, or graft dysfunction has not been observed in any of the patients. Under the canakinumab treatment, complete clinical responses, prevent typical familial Mediterranean fever attacks with fever and arthritis and abdominal pain, normalized serum amyloid A and C-reactive protein levels were achieved in all patients. Canakinumab treatment is a safe and effective therapeutic option for RKTs with FMF who are resistant or intolerant to colchicine and anakinra.

Management of Tumor Necrosis Factor α Inhibitor Therapy After Renal Transplantation: A Comparative Analysis and Associated Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Biologic agents inhibiting the tumor necrosis factor α pathway (TNFα-Is) are used to treat systemic inflammatory diseases. The best management of these agents after renal transplantation is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate peritransplant use of TNFα-Is and associated outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center study of adult renal-transplant-recipients (RTRs) transplanted between 1/1/1998-12/31/2017, who received TNFα-Is for inflammatory disease prior to transplant. Qualifying patients were divided into 2 cohorts: patients who resumed TNFα-Is after transplant and those who did not. Outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 5256 renal transplants occurred in the study window; 14 patients met inclusion criteria. Primary indication for TNFα-I was Crohn's-disease (CD; 57.1%). Infliximab was utilized most frequently (50%). Seven RTRs resumed TNFα-I posttransplant; mean time to resumption of 10.6±4.35 months (median=6 months), 85.7% for CD. Immunosuppression was modified in 2 patients (28.6%) in response to restarting TNFα-I therapy. Seven RTRs did not resume TNFα-Is following transplant; the majority of these had rheumatic diseases. There was no significant difference in time to first bacterial or fungal infection, rejection, or patient survival between the 2 groups. Last measured estimated glomerular-filtration-rate was similar between groups (TNFα-I: 41 ± 14.2 vs 48.6 ± 8.6, P = 0.25). No patient had cytomegalovirus infection; however, 42.8% of each cohort had documented BK virus infection. Malignancy occurred more frequently in the cohort that resumed TNFα-Is (42.8% vs 14.3%, P = 0.24); however, this was not statistically significant. Conclusion and Relevance: TNFα-I therapy prior to renal-transplant is relatively uncommon. The decision to continue therapy after transplant must balance risks of infection and malignancy against inflammatory disease recurrence. A multidisciplinary treatment approach is necessary as use of TNFα-I affects immunosuppressive management and appears to affect transplant outcomes. Future studies are needed to further clarify the role of TNFα-I therapy use in RTRs with inflammatory disorders focusing on its correlation with both BK and malignancy.

Inflammatory bowel disease in liver transplanted patients

Most common hepatobiliary manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune hepatitis, ranking them as the main cause of liver transplantation (LT) in IBD setting. Course of pre-existing IBD after LT differs depending on many transplant related factors. Potential risk factors related to IBD deterioration after LT are tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens, active IBD and cessation of 5-aminosalicylates at the time of LT. About 30% patients experience improvement of IBD after LT, while approximately the same percentage of patients worsens. Occurrence of de novo IBD may develop in 14%-30% of patients with PSC. Recommended IBD therapy after LT is equivalent to recommendations to overall IBD patients. Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha appears to be efficient for refractory IBD. Due to potential side effects it needs to be applied with caution. In average 9% of patients require proctocolectomy due to medically refractory IBD or colorectal carcinoma. The most frequent complication in patients who undergo proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis is pouchitis. It is still undeterminable if LT adds to risk of developing pouchitis in PSC patients. Annual colonoscopies are recommended as surveillance and precaution of colonic malignancies.