Comparison of clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients in China: A retrospective study

Percutaneous coronary intervention in insulin-treated diabetic patients: A meta-analysis

Background

This meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared long‐term adverse clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in insulin‐treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM) and non‐ITDM patients.

Methods

This is a meta‐analysis study. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for articles on long‐term adverse clinical outcomes of PCI in ITDM and non‐ITDM patients. The risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Results

A total of 11 related RCTs involving 8853 DM patients were included. Compared with non‐ITDM patients, ITDM patients had significantly higher all‐cause mortality (ACM) (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.25–1.85, p_{heterogeneity} = .689, I² = 0%), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.18–1.55, p_{heterogeneity} = .57, I² = 0%), myocardial infarction (MI) (RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.16–1.72, p_{heterogeneity} = .962, I² = 0%), and stent thrombosis (ST) (RR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.23–2.48, p_{heterogeneity} = .159, I² = 32.4%). No significant difference was found in the target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) between the ITDM and non‐ITDM groups.

Conclusions

The results showed that ITDM patients had significantly higher ACM, MACCE, MI, and ST, compared with non‐ITDM patients.

Coronary Angioplasty and Stenting in Acute Coronary Syndromes Using Very Low Contrast Volume and Radiation Dosage Improves Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes

Aim: To demonstrate that in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), using Cordis 6F Infiniti diagnostic catheters for angioplasty may represent a safe alternative associated with lower contrast volume and radiation dosage, improving cardiovascular and renal outcomes.

Material and Methods: In 1,800 patients with ACS (2,331 lesions/2,603 stents), angioplasty was performed with Cordis 6F Infiniti Thrulumen diagnostic catheters. Primary angioplasty was performed in 545 cases, and only balloon angioplasty in 67 patients. All procedures were performed through the femoral route, and switch-over to the radial route was made in 5 cases due to associated aortic/iliac obstructive lesions. Iodixanol was used in 76% of cases, and tirofiban in 99% of cases with adjusted dosages based on creatinine values. The mean contrast volume used per patient was 28 mL (± 6 mL) including the angiogram prior to the angioplasty.

Results: The median fluoroscopy time was 4.4 min (IQR 3–6.8), the mean fluoroscopy time was 5.59 min (± 0.28), the median dose-area product or kerma-area product was 1,507 µGym2 (IQR 918–2,611), median total or cumulative dose including backscatter was 2,702 µGym2 (IQR 1,805–4,217), and the median cumulative skin dose was 468 mGy (IQR 296–722). Groin hematoma was seen in 7 cases, proximal mild edge dissection in the deployed stent in 3 cases, and acute in-hospital stent thrombosis in 7 cases. In total, 33 deaths were registered and 19 of these patients had cardiogenic shock, of which 11 subjects were late presenters. Three patients died after discharge due to possible acute stent thrombosis.

Conclusions: Angioplasty and stenting can be performed safely in patients with acute coronary syndromes using Cordis 6F diagnostic catheters. The procedure was associated with a very low volume of contrast and radiation dose, leading to improved clinical outcomes..

Prognostic impact of diabetes mellitus on patients managed by urgent percutaneous coronary intervention

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is known to be associated with worse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

AIM

To assess prognostic impact of DM on patients managed by urgent PCI following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS

In a retrospective study, STEMI patients admitted to our department from January 2016 to December 2019 and treated with urgent PCI (primary or rescue PCI) were included. They were divided in two groups: Diabetic and non-diabetic patients. They were followed-up for a period of 12 months. Major cardiac adverse event (MACE) was a composite outcome of the following events: myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization or cardiovascular death. MACEs were collected during follow-up.

RESULTS

Our population consisted of 225 patients. DM was observed in 104 STEMI patients (46.2%). Diabetic patients had higher frequency of hypertension (p 1.4mmol/l (p 75 years, hyperglycemia at admission (>10mmol/l), extensive anterior infarction and procedure failure were associated with in-hospital mortality in the non-diabetic group. Factors associated with 12-months mortality and MACEs among diabetic patients were age > 75 years, anemia, CKD and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite modern era of STEMI treatment, diabetic patients still have a poor prognosis. These results highlight the need for coronary risk factors treatment among these patients.

Long-term safety and efficacy of the Resolute stent: 5-year results from the RESOLUTE China Registry: RESOLUTE China Registry 5-year outcomes

AIMS

Long-term clinical outcome data for second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are critical for the assessment of safety and efficacy. Five-year results from the RESOLUTE China Registry are presented in this report.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The RESOLUTE China Registry is a prospective, multicentre, observational study for all-comers requiring coronary stent implantation. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at one year, and the main secondary endpoint was definite or probable stent thrombosis at one year. Additional secondary endpoints assessed up to 5 years include rates of all deaths, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) and target lesion revascularisation (TLR). A total of 1,800 patients were enrolled from December 2010 to March 2012 at 30 sites in China and implanted with Resolute DES. At 5 years, TLF was 9.8%, TVMI 3.2%, TLR 4.6% and very late stent thrombosis 0.5%. Results of pre-specified subgroup analyses show 5-year TLF rates of 14.3% for diabetics and 13.4% for patients with chronic total occlusions.

CONCLUSIONS

The RESOLUTE China Registry is the largest study of Asian patients treated with second-generation Resolute DES. Clinical outcomes illustrate a robust safety and efficacy profile of Resolute DES in a real-word Asian population, including favourable performance in complex patient subsets.

The impact of diabetes mellitus on carotid artery stenting: a meta-analysis

Diabetes is considered to be one of the important factors affecting the prognosis of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA), but its effect on carotid stenting (CAS) has not been determined. We performed this analysis to evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on carotid stenting. Studies were searched in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for all available studies comparing the outcomes of diabetic and nondiabetic patients who underwent CAS. A meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with RevMan 5.3 software. Five studies with high quality were ultimately included. A total of 3364 patients underwent CAS, including 1042 diabetic patients and 2322 nondiabetic patients. Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of perioperative stroke(OR,1.20;95%CI,0.74-1.97;P = 0.46;I² = 24%), transient ischemic attack(TIA)(OR,1.46;95%CI,0.80-2.66;P=0.22;I²=37%), myocardial infarction(MI)(OR,1.12;95%CI,0.47-2.67;P=0.80;I²=0%), mortality (OR,1.77;95%CI,0.91-3.42;P = 0.09;I²=0%), and composite of stroke or death (OR,1.26;95%CI,0.87-1.81;P = 0.22;I²=35%) between diabetic and nondiabetic patients receiving CAS. Sensitivity analysis showed that the meta-analysis results of all outcome events were stable. Compared with nondiabetic patients, diabetes did not increase the risk of the following: perioperative stroke, TIA, MI, mortality, and composite of stroke or death in patients receiving CAS. This study may be used to guide carotid artery stenosis patients with diabetes to choose the optimal treatment option. However, due to the limited number of studies and the different technical levels of institutions, the results should be interpreted caution.

Early and Late Stent Thrombosis in Patients with Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Eluting Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, drug-eluting stents (DES) are most commonly used compared with bare metal stents (BMS) since the former are associated with significantly lower rates of revascularization following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, unpredictable in-stent thrombosis is a major concern with DES, especially in patients with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE

In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare early and late stent thrombosis in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus following PCI with DES.

METHODS

Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials or observational studies comparing patients with diabetes mellitus versus those without it following PCI with DES and they reported acute and sub-acute/early and late stent thrombosis among their clinical outcomes. Early stent thrombosis was defined as stent thrombosis that occurred before 30 days and late stent thrombosis was defined as stent thrombosis that occurred after 30 days following PCI. The statistical analysis was carried out by the new version of the RevMan software (version 5.3), and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were considered as the statistical parameters.

RESULTS

A total number of 18,910 patients were included in this analysis comparing early and late stent thrombosis in patients with diabetes mellitus (5123 patients) and in patients without diabetes mellitus (13,787 patients). Both groups of patients had similar rates of early stent thrombosis, with an OR of 1.30 (95% CI 0.89-1.91; P = 0.18, I² = 9%) (4962 patients with diabetes mellitus were compared with 13,392 patients without diabetes mellitus). However, late stent thrombosis was significantly higher in patients with diabetes mellitus, with an OR of 1.95 (95% CI 1.35- 2.81; P = 0.0004, I² = 0%) (5113 patients with diabetes mellitus and 13,775 patients without diabetes mellitus were compared).

CONCLUSIONS

Both patients with and without diabetes mellitus had a similar rate of early stent thrombosis following PCI with DES. However, diabetes mellitus was associated with a significantly higher rate of late stent thrombosis.

Type-2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease

The global prevalence of diabetes has risen in adults from 4.7% in 1980 to 8.5% in 2014. 90–95% of adults with diabetes have Type 2 diabetes (T2D). This paper focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of T2D patients who have or are at risk for cardiovascular disease. Hyperglycemia, insulin resistance and excess fatty acids increase oxidative stress, disrupt protein kinase C signaling and increase advanced glycation end-products that result in vascular inflammation, vasoconstriction, thrombosis and atherogenesis. Intensive T2D treatment produces a ≥10% risk reduction in major macrovascular and microvascular events. Glucose-lowering therapies must be individualized. Metformin is an optimal drug for monotherapy. If hemoglobin A1c is not at goal, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor or a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor should be considered for therapy with metformin. Coronary angioplasty/stenting is recommended for diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarctions. Coronary artery bypass grafting is recommended for symptomatic diabetic patients with multivessel disease.

Early (≤ 30 Days), Late (31-360 Days) and Very Late (> 360 Days) Stent Thrombosis in Patients with Insulin-Treated versus Non-Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

At this time in 2018, with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) still on the rise, the post-percutaneous coronary interventional (PCI) outcomes observed in patients with diabetes mellitus who are on insulin therapy (ITDM) and those who do not require insulin (NITDM) are still controversial and require further investigation. Considering this idea to be of particular interest to the readers, as well as being an important issue in interventional cardiology, we aimed to systematically assess early (≤ 30 days), late (31-360 days) and very late (> 360 days) stent thrombosis in patients with ITDM and NITDM following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.

METHODS

Well-known online databases (the Cochrane, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases and http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov ) were searched for relevant English publications based on ITDM and NITDM and stent thrombosis following PCI using specific terms. Early stent thrombosis, late stent thrombosis and very late stent thrombosis were the clinical outcomes. The main analysis was carried out using the latest version of the RevMan software (version 5.3) whereby odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated.

RESULTS

A total of 8524 participants with T2DM (2273 participants were on insulin therapy and 6251 participants were not) were included. Results of this analysis showed early stent thrombosis to be significantly higher in patients with ITDM (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.04-3.15; P = 0.04), whereas late and very late stent thromboses were not significantly different following PCI with DES in diabetic patients with versus without insulin therapy (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.73-2.84, P = 0.30 and OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.33-1.92, P = 0.62, respectively). Late stent thromboses associated exclusively with everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) were not significantly different in patients with ITDM and NITDM.

CONCLUSION

Following PCI with DES, early stent thrombosis was significantly higher in patients with ITDM. However, late and very late stent thromboses were not significantly different in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were treated with or without insulin. Comparison with individual DES was not sufficiently powerful to reach a conclusion.