1
|
Loftus AW, Hue JJ, Elshami M, Miller-Ocuin JL, Steinhagen E, Hoehn RS, Rothermel LD, Ammori JB, Hardacre JM, Ocuin LM. An Age-Stratified Analysis of Early Postoperative Mortality Among Medicare-Eligible Patients With Common Gastrointestinal and Hepato-pancreato-biliary Malignancies. Am Surg 2024:31348241256057. [PMID: 38839096 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241256057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
Background: The frequency of major cancer surgery in the elderly (≥80 years) has increased concomitantly with the rise in average age of the population. We assessed early postoperative mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) and gastrointestinal (GI) procedures for common malignancies stratified by age. Methods: The National Cancer Database (2004-2017) was queried for patients who underwent resection for GI (gastroesophageal and colorectal) or HPB (pancreatic adenocarcinoma, biliary tract, and primary liver) cancers. We compared early postoperative mortality (30 d and 90 d) stratified by age (65-79 vs ≥80 years) and procedure, and compared survival outcomes by age and operative vs nonoperative management. Results: A total of 709,358 patients were included. The 30-day mortality ranged from 1.8% to 5.8% among patients 65-79 years and from 3.2% to 12.4% among patients ≥80 years depending on procedure. The 90-day mortality ranged from 3.6% to 10.6% in patients 65-79 years compared to 8.4%-21.0% among patients ≥80 years. The overall 90-day mortality was 5.2% for patients 65-79 years and 12.0% for patients ≥80 years (P < .001). Age ≥80 was associated with worse survival among operatively managed patients with each upper GI, HPB, and lower GI malignancy relative to younger patients on multivariable analysis. However, operative management of patients ≥80 years was associated with improved survival relative to nonoperative management. Discussion: Elderly patients suffer higher postoperative mortality after major GI and HPB cancer surgery, but operative management is associated with improved survival among patients ≥80 years as compared to nonoperative management. These data are important to contextualize when counseling elderly patients on their treatment options for localized GI and HPB cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander W Loftus
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jonathan J Hue
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mohamedraed Elshami
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer L Miller-Ocuin
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Emily Steinhagen
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Richard S Hoehn
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Luke D Rothermel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John B Ammori
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Hardacre
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lee M Ocuin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Terasaki F, Hirakawa S, Tachimori H, Sugiura T, Nanashima A, Komatsu S, Miyata H, Kakeji Y, Kitagawa Y, Nakamura M, Endo I. Morbidity after left trisectionectomy for hepato-biliary malignancies: An analysis of the National Clinical Database of Japan. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2023; 30:1304-1315. [PMID: 37750342 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyze the nationwide surgical outcome of a left trisectionectomy (LT) and to identify the perioperative risk factors associated with its morbidity. METHODS Cases of LT for hepato-biliary malignancies registered at the Japanese National Clinical Database between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analyses were performed to identify the perioperative risk factors associated with a morbidity of Clavien-Dindo classification (CD) ≥III. RESULTS Left trisectionectomy was performed on 473 and 238 cases of biliary and nonbiliary cancers, respectively. Morbidity of CD ≥III and V occurred in 45% and 5% of cases with biliary cancer, respectively, compared with 26% and 2% of cases with nonbiliary cancer, respectively. In multivariable analyses, biliary cancer was significantly associated with a morbidity of CD ≥III (odds ratio, 1.87; p = .018). In subgroup analyses for biliary cancer, classification of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) 2, portal vein resection (PVR), and intraoperative blood loss ≥30 mL/kg were significantly associated with a morbidity of CD ≥III. CONCLUSIONS Biliary cancer induces severe morbidity after LT. The ASA-PS classification, PVR, and intraoperative blood loss indicate severe morbidity after LT for biliary cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumihiro Terasaki
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Shinya Hirakawa
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Endowed Course for Health System Innovation, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisateru Tachimori
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Endowed Course for Health System Innovation, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Teiichi Sugiura
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Atsushi Nanashima
- Project Management Subcommittee, The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shohei Komatsu
- Project Management Subcommittee, The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Miyata
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Kakeji
- Database Committee, The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masafumi Nakamura
- Project Committee, Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kerekes DM, Frey AE, Bakkila BF, Johnson CH, Becher RD, Billingsley KG, Khan SA. Hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies: time to treatment matters. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 14:833-848. [PMID: 37201090 PMCID: PMC10186552 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-1067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Initiation of oncologic care is often delayed, yet little is known about delays in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers or their impact. This retrospective cohort study describes trends in time to treatment initiation (TTI), assesses the association between TTI and survival, and identifies predictors of TTI in HPB cancers. Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with cancers of the pancreas, liver, and bile ducts between 2004 and 2017. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were used to investigate the association between TTI and overall survival for each cancer type and stage. Multivariable regression identified factors associated with longer TTI. Results Of 318,931 patients with HPB cancers, median TTI was 31 days. Longer TTI was associated with increased mortality in patients with stages I-III extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancer and stages I-II pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients treated within 3-30, 31-60, and 61-90 days had median survivals of 51.5, 34.9, and 25.4 months (log-rank P<0.001), respectively, for stage I EHBD cancer, and 18.8, 16.6, and 15.2 months for stage I pancreatic cancer, respectively (P<0.001). Factors associated with increased TTI included stage I disease (+13.7 days vs. stage IV, P<0.001), treatment with radiation only (β=+13.9 days, P<0.001), Black race (+4.6 days, P<0.001) and Hispanic ethnicity (+4.3 days, P<0.001). Conclusions Some HPB cancer patients with longer time to definitive care experienced higher mortality than patients treated expeditiously, particularly in non-metastatic EHBD cancer. Black and Hispanic patients are at risk for delayed treatment. Further research into these associations is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Caroline H. Johnson
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Robert D. Becher
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Sajid A. Khan
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Delvecchio A, Conticchio M, Riccelli U, Ferraro V, Ratti F, Gelli M, Anelli FM, Laurent A, Vitali GC, Magistri P, Assirati G, Felli E, Wakabayashi T, Pessaux P, Piardi T, Di Benedetto F, de'Angelis N, Briceño-Delgado J, Adam R, Cherqui D, Aldrighetti L, Memeo R. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a propensity score matching analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:933-941. [PMID: 34815189 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection is a first-line curative option for hepatocellular carcinoma, but its role is still unclear in elderly patients. The aim of our study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS The study included 665 consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma liver resection cases in patients with ≥70 years of age treated in eight European hospital centres. Patients were divided into laparoscopic and open liver resection groups. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups. RESULTS After a 1:1 propensity score matching, 219 patients were included in each group. Clavien-Dindo grades III/IV (6 vs. 20%, p = 0.04) were lower in the laparoscopic than in the open matched group. Hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic than in the open matched group (5 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between laparoscopic and open groups regarding overall survival and disease-free survival at 1-, 3- and 5- year periods. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with good short-term outcomes in patients with ≥70 years of age compared to open liver resection. Laparoscopic liver resection is safe and feasible in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Umberto Riccelli
- Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Valentina Ferraro
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Miulli Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maximiliano Gelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Hepatobiliary Centre, Paul Brousse University Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Ferdinando M Anelli
- Department of General Surgery and Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, UPEC University, Créteil, France
| | - Giulio C Vitali
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Giacomo Assirati
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Emanuele Felli
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Taiga Wakabayashi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France; Department of Surgery, HPB Unit, Troyes Hospital, Troyes, France
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, UPEC University, Créteil, France
| | - Javier Briceño-Delgado
- Department of General Surgery and Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Rene Adam
- Hepatobiliary Centre, Paul Brousse University Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Hepatobiliary Centre, Paul Brousse University Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Miulli Hospital, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sucandy I, Luberice K, Rivera-Espineira G, Krill E, Castro M, Bourdeau T, Ross S, Rosemurgy A. Robotic Major Hepatectomy: Influence of Age on Clinical Outcomes. Am Surg 2020; 87:114-119. [PMID: 32841058 DOI: 10.1177/0003134820945249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was undertaken to determine if age influences postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing robotic major hepatectomy. METHODS Ninety-four patients undergoing robotic major hepatectomy were prospectively followed. With regression analysis, demographic data and postoperative outcomes were compared to age. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD). RESULTS Overall, the patients were of age 62 (61 ± 13) years, body mass index (BMI) of 29 (29 ± 5.9) kg/m2, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of 3 (3 ± 0.5). The mass size was 5 (5 ± 3.0) cm. The operative duration was 252 (276 ± 106) minutes with an estimated blood loss (EBL) of 175 (249 ± 275.9) mL. One operation was converted to "open" due to bleeding, accounting for the only intraoperative complication. Nine patients required intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Postoperatively, 7 patients had complications with no in-hospital mortalities, and a length of stay (LOS) of 4 (5 ± 2.6) days. Thirteen patients were readmitted within 30 days with 0 deaths within 30 days.A significant relationship was found between age and ASA class (P = .001) and LOS (P = .03). No correlation was found when comparing age to operative duration, EBL, ICU admission, ICU duration, complications, and readmission within 30 days. CONCLUSION For patients undergoing robotic major hepatectomy, there was no significant correlation between age and perioperative outcomes, with the exception of LOS. Increasing age is not associated with increased morbidity or perioperative mortality. With the application of innovative technology, that is, the robotic approach, surgeons should be encouraged to undertake major hepatectomy in elderly patients deemed candidates for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iswanto Sucandy
- Advent Health Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Emily Krill
- Advent Health Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Miguel Castro
- Advent Health Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Sharona Ross
- Advent Health Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Impact of patient, primary tumor and metastatic pattern including tumor location on survival in patients undergoing ablation or resection for colorectal liver metastases: A population-based national cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:375-383. [PMID: 32828581 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Selecting the optimal treatment strategy for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) aim to improve survival for the total cohort. Following the introduction of laparoscopic resections and ablation, localization may direct choice of method. The aim with this study was to re-evaluate prognostic factors that should be considered at the preoperative multidisciplinary tumor board, based on a national population cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS A national cohort with radically operated colorectal cancer in 2009-2013, also treated for CRLM was identified in Swedish national registries. Prognostic factors were identified and evaluated in multivariable analyses. RESULTS 1200 patients treated with resection and 125 with ablation only were included in the study cohort. Relative five-year survival was 54.7% (50.9%-58.4%) and 32.0% (22.4%-41.9%), respectively). High age, acute surgery and complications at time of primary tumor resection remained important risk factors at liver surgery, as well as the primary tumor characteristics; vascular invasion and high lymph node ratio. As for metastatic pattern; tumor size, location in segment 4, 6, 7 or 8, multiple metastatic sites and progress after preoperative chemotherapy were significant risk factors. In multivariate analyses, ablation therapy doubled the risk of death within 5 years. This strong negative impact was confirmed in a weighted propensity score analysis (HR = 2.1 (95 % CI 1.5 -3.0)). CONCLUSION Segmental localization and tumor size were prognostic factors but also patient and primary tumor factors significantly impacted survival after intervention for CRLM. Long-term survival was significantly lower after ablation therapy compared to surgical resection.
Collapse
|
7
|
Shin IS, Kim DG, Cha SW, Kang SH, Kim SH, Kim MY, Baik SK. Hepatocellular carcinoma in old age: are there any benefits of liver resection in old age? Ann Surg Treat Res 2020; 99:65-71. [PMID: 32802811 PMCID: PMC7406395 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2020.99.2.65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Elderly individuals have comorbidities that can adversely affect surgical outcomes. Some studies reported that elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have higher liver- and non-liver-related deaths. Therefore, palliative treatments are preferred in these patients. We compared surgical treatment outcomes between young and old age groups. Methods In total, 233 liver resections were performed in patients with HCC from March 2012 to December 2018. We retrospectively reviewed medical records. The old age group was defined as patients aged more than 70 years. We compared perioperative characteristics and surgical outcomes and analyzed the prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. Results The young and old age group included 184 and 49 patients, respectively. Preoperative characteristics were similar. Major liver resection rate was similar (young age group, 26.1% vs. old age group, 20.4%), but the operation time was a little bit shorter in old age group. Major postoperative complications were 23 (12.5%) and 9 (18.4%) in the young and old age group (P = 0.351). Median non-liver-related overall survival were 80 and 76 months (P = 0.889) and liver-related OS were 76 and 76 months (P = 0.514) in the young and old age groups, respectively. Age was not an independent risk factor for DFS and OS. Conclusion Elderly patients showed similar non-liver- and liver-related OS rates as young patients after liver resection. Postoperative complications were also similar. If elderly patients are well selected, they can receive curative treatment and show good surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- In Sik Shin
- Department of Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Deok Gie Kim
- Department of Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Sung Whan Cha
- Department of Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Seong Hee Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Sung Hoon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Moon Young Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Soon Koo Baik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Olthof PB, Elfrink AKE, Marra E, Belt EJT, van den Boezem PB, Bosscha K, Consten ECJ, den Dulk M, Gobardhan PD, Hagendoorn J, van Heek TNT, IJzermans JNM, Klaase JM, Kuhlmann KFD, Leclercq WKG, Liem MSL, Manusama ER, Marsman HA, Mieog JSD, Oosterling SJ, Patijn GA, Te Riele W, Swijnenburg RJ, Torrenga H, van Duijvendijk P, Vermaas M, Kok NFM, Grünhagen DJ. Volume-outcome relationship of liver surgery: a nationwide analysis. Br J Surg 2020; 107:917-926. [PMID: 32207856 PMCID: PMC7384098 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Evidence for an association between hospital volume and outcomes for liver surgery is abundant. The current Dutch guideline requires a minimum volume of 20 annual procedures per centre. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between hospital volume and postoperative outcomes using data from the nationwide Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit. Methods This was a nationwide study in the Netherlands. All liver resections reported in the Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit between 2014 and 2017 were included. Annual centre volume was calculated and classified in categories of 20 procedures per year. Main outcomes were major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIA or higher) and 30‐day or in‐hospital mortality. Results A total of 5590 liver resections were done across 34 centres with a median annual centre volume of 35 (i.q.r. 20–69) procedures. Overall major morbidity and mortality rates were 11·2 and 2·0 per cent respectively. The mortality rate was 1·9 per cent after resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), 1·2 per cent for non‐CRLMs, 0·4 per cent for benign tumours, 4·9 per cent for hepatocellular carcinoma and 10·3 per cent for biliary tumours. Higher‐volume centres performed more major liver resections, and more resections for hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary cancer. There was no association between hospital volume and either major morbidity or mortality in multivariable analysis, after adjustment for known risk factors for adverse events. Conclusion Hospital volume and postoperative outcomes were not associated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A K E Elfrink
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - E Marra
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - E J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - P B van den Boezem
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - K Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's- Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - M den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - J Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - T N T van Heek
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - J N M IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - K F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W K G Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medisch Centrum, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - E R Manusama
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwardena, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - H A Marsman
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J S D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - S J Oosterling
- Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - G A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwollea, the Netherlands
| | - W Te Riele
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - R-J Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H Torrenga
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - P van Duijvendijk
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwollea, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Gelre Hospital Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - M Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - N F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sahara K, Paredes AZ, Merath K, Tsilimigras DI, Bagante F, Ratti F, Marques HP, Soubrane O, Beal EW, Lam V, Poultsides GA, Popescu I, Alexandrescu S, Martel G, Aklile W, Guglielmi A, Hugh T, Aldrighetti L, Endo I, Pawlik TM. Evaluation of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:551-559. [PMID: 30937717 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04174-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) surgical risk calculator (SRC) aims to help predict patient-specific risk for morbidity and mortality. The performance of the SRC among an elderly population undergoing curative-intent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unknown. METHODS Patients > 70 years of age who underwent hepatectomy for HCC between 1998 and 2017 were identified using a multi-institutional international database. To estimate the performance of SRC, 12 observed postoperative outcomes were compared with median SRC-predicted risk, and C-statistics and Brier scores were calculated. RESULTS Among 500 patients, median age was 75 years (IQR 72-78). Most patients (n = 324, 64.8%) underwent a minor hepatectomy, while 35.2% underwent a major hepatectomy. The observed incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (3.2%) and renal failure (RF) (4.4%) exceeded the median predicted risk (VTE, 1.8%; IQR 1.5-3.1 and RF, 1.0%; IQR 0.5-2.0). In contrast, the observed incidence of 30-day readmission (7.0%) and non-home discharge (2.5%) was lower than median-predicted risk (30-day readmission, 9.4%; IQR 7.4-12.8 and non-home discharge, 5.7%; IQR 3.3-11.7). Only 57.8% and 71.2% of patients who experienced readmission (C-statistic, 0.578; 95%CI 0.468-0.688) or mortality (C-statistic, 0.712; 95%CI 0.508-0.917) were correctly identified by the model. CONCLUSION Among elderly patients undergoing hepatectomy for HCC, the SRC underestimated the risk of complications such as VTE and RF, while being no better than chance in estimating the risk of readmission. The ACS SRC has limited clinical applicability in estimating perioperative risk among elderly patients being considered for hepatic resection of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kota Sahara
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Anghela Z Paredes
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Katiuscha Merath
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Fabio Bagante
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Hugo P Marques
- Department of Surgery, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, APHP, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Eliza W Beal
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Vincent Lam
- Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Irinel Popescu
- Department of Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | | - Workneh Aklile
- Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Tom Hugh
- Department of Surgery, The University of Sydney, School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lallement M, Maulat C, Suc B, Péré G, Lozano S, Bérard E, Muscari F. Short-term autonomy and survival after hepatectomy in the elderly. J Visc Surg 2020; 157:378-386. [PMID: 31980381 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM To study morbi-mortality, survival after hepatectomy in elderly patients, and influence on their short-term autonomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a retrospective study conducted between 2002 and 2017 comparing patients less than 65 years old (controls) to those more than 65 years old (cases) from a prospective database, with retrospective collection of geriatric data. Cases were divided into three sub-groups (65-70 years, 70-80 years and>80 years). RESULTS Four hundred and eighty-two patients were included. There was no age difference in number of major hepatectomies (P=0.5506), length of stay (P=0.3215), mortality at 90 days (P=0.3915), and surgical complications (P=0.1467). There were more Grade 1 Clavien medical complications among the patients aged over 65 years (P=0.1737). There was no difference in overall survival (P=0.460) or disease-free survival (P=0.108) according to age after adjustment for type of disease and hepatectomy. One-third of patients had geriatric complications. The "home discharge" rate decreased significantly with age from 92% to 68% (P=0.0001). Early loss of autonomy after hospitalization increased with age, 16% between 65 and 70 years, 23% between 70 and 80 years and 36% after 80 years (P=0.10). We identified four independent predictors of loss of autonomy: age>70 years, cholangiocarcinoma, length of stay>10 days, and metachronous colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients had the same management as young patients, with no difference in surgery or survival, but with an increase in early loss of autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lallement
- Unité hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation, département de chirurgie et de transplantation d'organes, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
| | - C Maulat
- Unité hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation, département de chirurgie et de transplantation d'organes, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - B Suc
- Unité hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation, département de chirurgie et de transplantation d'organes, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - G Péré
- Unité hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation, département de chirurgie et de transplantation d'organes, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - S Lozano
- Unité de gériatrie et oncogériatrie, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France
| | - E Bérard
- Service d'épidémiologie, pôle santé publique et médecine sociale, département d'épidémiologie, économie de la santé et santé publique, CHU de Toulouse, Inserm UMR 1027, Toulouse, France
| | - F Muscari
- Unité hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation, département de chirurgie et de transplantation d'organes, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lillemoe HA, Marcus RK, Kim BJ, Narula N, Davis CH, Shi Q, Wang XS, Aloia TA. Severe Preoperative Symptoms Delay Readiness to Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy (RIOT) After Liver Resection. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:4548-4555. [PMID: 31414293 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07719-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Symptom burden, as measured by patient-reported outcome (PRO) metrics, may have prognostic value in various cancer populations, but remains underreported. The aim of this project was to determine the predictive impact of preoperative patient-reported symptom burden on readiness to return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) after oncologic liver resection. METHODS Preoperative factors, including anthropometric analysis of sarcopenia, were collected for patients undergoing oncologic liver resection from 2015 to 2018. All patients reported their preoperative symptom burden using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, Gastrointestinal version (MDASI-GI). Time to RIOT readiness was compared using standard statistics. RESULTS Preoperative symptom burden was measured in 107 consecutive patients; 52% had at least one moderate symptom score and 21% reported at least one severe score. Highest rated symptoms were fatigue, disturbed sleep, and distress. For patients reporting a severe preoperative symptom burden, the median time to RIOT readiness was 35 days (interquartile range [IQR] 28-42), compared with 21 days (IQR 21-28) for those without severe symptoms (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, severe preoperative symptom burden was independently associated with longer time to RIOT readiness (estimate +7.5 days, 95% confidence interval 2.6-12.3; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative symptom burden has a substantial impact on time to RIOT readiness, leading to, on average, a 7-day delay in RIOT readiness compared with patients without severe preoperative symptoms. Identifying and targeting severe preoperative symptoms may hasten recovery and improve time to necessary adjuvant therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather A Lillemoe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rebecca K Marcus
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bradford J Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nisha Narula
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Catherine H Davis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Qiuling Shi
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xin Shelley Wang
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas A Aloia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Conci S, Ruzzenente A, Viganò L, Ercolani G, Fontana A, Bagante F, Bertuzzo F, Dore A, Pinna AD, Torzilli G, Iacono C, Guglielmi A. Patterns of Distribution of Hepatic Nodules (Single, Satellites or Multifocal) in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic Impact After Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3719-3727. [PMID: 30088126 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6669-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to compare the clinicopathological features and survival after surgery of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) according to the patterns of distribution of hepatic nodules. METHODS A retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional series of 259 patients with resected ICC was carried out. Patients were further classified according to the pattern of distribution of hepatic nodules: single tumors (type I), single tumors with satellites in the same liver segment (type II), or multifocal tumors (type III). RESULTS Overall, 64.5% of patients had type I, 21.9% had type II, and 13.5% had type III. The 5-year overall survival rate was 49.4, 34.2, and 9.9% for types I, II, and III, respectively (p < 0.001). A multivariate survival analysis identified the following independent prognostic factors: pattern types II and III (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively), size ≥ 50 mm (p = 0.021), lymph node (LN) metastases (p = 0.005), and R1 resections (p = 0.019). We stratified survival for each type of pattern according to the other prognostic factors identified in the multivariate analysis. N0 and R0 patients with type II and III tumors had encouraging long-term results. Conversely, patients with LN metastases and R1 resections had poor prognosis, particularly patients with type III tumors. CONCLUSION ICC has distinct patterns of distribution with different prognoses that should be considered when making therapeutic decisions. Patients with type III tumors had a significantly worse prognosis, and the benefits of upfront surgery should be carefully evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Conci
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, G.B, Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, 37134, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, G.B, Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, 37134, Italy
| | - Luca Viganò
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery and Organ Transplantation, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Fontana
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Bagante
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, G.B, Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, 37134, Italy
| | - Francesca Bertuzzo
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, G.B, Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, 37134, Italy
| | - Andrea Dore
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, G.B, Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, 37134, Italy
| | - Antonio Daniele Pinna
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery and Organ Transplantation, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Calogero Iacono
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, G.B, Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, 37134, Italy.
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, G.B, Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, 37134, Italy
| |
Collapse
|