Ivabradine has a neutral effect on mortality in randomized controlled trials

Ivabradine in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Elevated resting heart rate (HR) predicts poor outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. Ivabradine has been recommended as a second-line anti-anginal agent in chronic coronary syndrome, while there are no clear indications for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

RESULTS

We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Clinical Trials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with search terms Ivabradine and Acute myocardial infarction. There are two study outcomes from this study: therapeutic and safety effects. Therapeutic effects include the efficacy of Ivabradine on HR, all-cause mortality, heart failure incidence, left ventricular function and remodeling. Safety effects include troponin levels and ischemic events (recurrent angina pectoris). A total of 6 RCTs was included and showed that Ivabradine was associated with greater resting HR reduction [MD - 5.40; 95%CI - 8.60, - 2.20], improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction [MD 2.98; 95%CI 0.44, 5.51], and left ventricular end systolic volume [MD - 3.81; 95%CI - 6.88, - 0.75]. However, Ivabradine had no impact on all-cause mortality [OR 0.76; 95%CI 0.35, 1.67], heart failure incidence [OR 0.61; 95%CI 0.21, 1.80], and recurrent angina pectoris [OR 0.71; 95%CI 0.50, 1.00].

CONCLUSIONS

Ivabradine is safe and effective for resting HR reduction in patients with STEMI; however, it has no significant influence on mortality. These results suggest that an elevated HR is only a marker of risk but not a modifiable determinant of outcomes in patients who have suffered an acute myocardial infarction.

Adaptation of Arterial Wall Viscosity to the Short-Term Reduction of Heart Rate: Impact of Aging

Background Changes in arterial wall viscosity, which dissipates the energy stored within the arterial wall, may contribute to the beneficial effect of heart rate (HR) reduction on arterial stiffness and cardiovascular coupling. However, it has never been assessed in humans and could be altered by aging. We evaluated the effect of a selective HR-lowering agent on carotid arterial wall viscosity and the impact of aging on this effect. Methods and Results This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study performed in 19 healthy volunteers evaluated the effects of ivabradine (5 mg BID, 1-week) on carotid arterial wall viscosity, mechanics, hemodynamics, and cardiovascular coupling. Arterial wall viscosity was evaluated by the area of the hysteresis loop of the pressure-lumen cross-sectional area relationship, representing the energy dissipated (W_V), and by the relative viscosity (W_V/W_E), with W_E representing the elastic energy stored. HR reduction by ivabradine increased W_V and W_E whereas W_V/W_E remained stable. In middle-aged subjects (n=11), baseline arterial stiffness and cardiovascular coupling were less favorable, and W_E was similar but W_V and therefore W_V/W_E were lower than in youth (n=8). HR reduction increased W_V/W_E in middle-aged but not in young subjects, owing to a larger increase in W_V than W_E. These results were supported by the age-related linear increase in W_V/W_E after HR reduction (P=0.009), explained by a linear increase in W_V. Conclusion HR reduction increases arterial wall energy dissipation proportionally to the increase in W_E, suggesting an adaptive process to bradycardia. This mechanism is altered during aging resulting in a larger than expected energy dissipation, the impact of which should be assessed. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: 2015/077/HP. URL: https://www. eudract.ema.europa.eu; Unique identifier: 2015-002060-17.

Effects of adding ivabradine to usual care in patients with angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of ivabradine on outcomes important to patients with angina pectoris caused by coronary artery disease.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review. We included randomised clinical trials comparing ivabradine versus placebo or no intervention for patients with angina pectoris due to coronary artery disease published prior to June 2020. We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, Cochrane methodology, Trial Sequential Analysis, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, and our eight-step procedure. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events and quality of life.

RESULTS

We included 47 randomised clinical trials enrolling 35 797 participants. All trials and outcomes were at high risk of bias. Ivabradine compared with control did not have effects when assessing all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.04; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.13), quality of life (standardised mean differences -0.05; 95% CI -0.11 to 0.01), cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.18) and myocardial infarction (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.16). Ivabradine seemed to increase the risk of serious adverse events after removal of outliers (RR 1.07; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.11) as well as the following adverse events classified as serious: bradycardia, prolonged QT interval, photopsia, atrial fibrillation and hypertension. Ivabradine also increased the risk of non-serious adverse events (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.16). Ivabradine might have a statistically significant effect when assessing angina frequency (mean difference (MD) 2.06; 95% CI 0.82 to 3.30) and stability (MD 1.48; 95% CI 0.07 to 2.89), but the effect sizes seemed minimal and possibly without any relevance to patients, and we identified several methodological limitations, questioning the validity of these results.

CONCLUSION

Our findings do not support that ivabradine offers significant benefits on patient important outcomes, but rather seems to increase the risk of serious adverse events such as atrial fibrillation and non-serious adverse events. Based on current evidence, guidelines need reassessment and the use of ivabradine for angina pectoris should be reconsidered.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018112082.

Ivabradine for coronary artery disease and/or heart failure-a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease and heart failure are both highly prevalent diseases with a global prevalence of 93 million and 40 million. These patients are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The management of these patients involves medical therapy, and both diseases can be treated using the heart rate-lowering drug ivabradine. However, the evidence regarding the use of ivabradine in the treatment of coronary artery disease and/or heart failure is unclear. Our objective is to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ivabradine in the treatment of coronary artery disease and/or heart failure.

METHODS

This protocol for a systematic review was undertaken using the recommendations of The Cochrane Collaboration, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P), and the eight-step assessment procedure suggested by Jakobsen and colleagues. We plan to include all relevant randomised clinical trials assessing the use of ivabradine in the treatment of coronary artery disease and/or heart failure. We will search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Science Citation Index Expanded on Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science Journal Database (VIP), and BIOSIS in order to identify relevant trials. We will begin the searches in February 2019. All included trials will be assessed and classified at low risk of bias or at high risk of bias. Our primary conclusions will be based on the results from the primary outcomes at low risk of bias. Extracted data will be analysed using Review Manager 5.3 and Trial Sequential Analysis 0.9.5.10. We will create a 'Summary of Findings' table in which we will present our primary and secondary outcomes, and we will assess the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

DISCUSSION

The systematic review will have the potential to aid clinicians in decision-making regarding ivabradine and to benefit patients with coronary artery disease and/or heart failure.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018112082.

Ivabradine does not impair anxiety-like behavior and memory in both healthy and L-NAME-induced hypertensive rats

Cardiovascular pathologies are frequently associated with anxiety and other behavioral disturbances. Ivabradine, an inhibitor of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels in the sinoatrial node, decreases heart rate and provides cardiovascular protection. Although ivabradine is increasingly used in cardiovascular medicine, the data on its behavioral effects are lacking. The aim of this work was to show ivabradine's potential effect on behavior in healthy and hypertensive rats. After a four-week treatment period, systolic blood pressure was increased in the N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)-group and ivabradine significantly reduced it. Furthermore, it reduced the heart rate in both the control and L-NAME-group. In the control group, ivabradine enhanced the time spent in and transition to the open arms of the elevated plus maze test (EPM). In the L-NAME-group, ivabradine does not show a significant effect on the time spent in the EPM open arms and the number of transitions into them. Furthermore, ivabradine has no impact on cognitive function in both control and L-NAME groups. We conclude that ivabradine showed no undesirable effects on anxiety, locomotion or learning; in fact, some of these parameters were even improved. For the first time it has been shown that ivabradine is a safe cardiovascular drug regarding its effect on psycho-behavioral manifestations.