Clinical analysis of 23 cases of steroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head with normal initial magnetic resonance imaging presentation

The painful joint after COVID-19 treatment: A study on joint osteonecrosis following COVID-19-related corticosteroid use

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the incidence of osteonecrosis (ONC), with a special focus on ONC of the femoral head (ONFH), in novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients two years after the pandemic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study included COVID-19 patients who were admitted to our center between March 2020 and June 2020. A total of 472 patients (289 males, 183 females; mean age: 42.3±12.0 years; range, 18 to 60 years) were arranged in a list according to their date and time of admission and, then, divided into two groups: those not receiving corticosteroid (CS) treatment (Group 1, n=236) and those receiving CS treatment (Group 2, n=236). The patients were evaluated for joint pain based on X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging scans, and the patients were routinely followed. For each patient in Group 2, additional data regarding CS use were recorded. The possible relationship between ONC and risk factors was analyzed.

RESULTS

Both groups were similar in terms of age and sex. Group 2 had a significantly longer hospitalization period. A significant increase in the number of painful joints was observed in Group 2. At two years, 5.1% of the patients in Group 1 complained of at least one painful joint compared to 11.9% of patients in Group 2. Eight patients from Group 2 developed ONC.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of ONC after CS therapy in COVID-19 patients is on the rise. At two years, 5% of patients receiving various doses of CSs may develop ONC. Residual joint pain is common even after recovering from the virus. No relationship is evident between the duration of treatment, cumulative dosage of medication, maximum one-day dosage received, and the presence of ONC.

Beware of Steroid-Induced Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head in the Treatment of COVID-19-Experience and Lessons from the SARS Epidemic

Summary

The recent outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global epidemic. Corticosteroids have been widely used in the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and the pathological findings seen in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are very similar to those observed in severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection. However, the long-term use of corticosteroids (especially at high doses) is associated with potentially serious adverse events, particularly steroid-induced avascular necrosis of the femoral head (SANFH). In today’s global outbreak, whether corticosteroid therapy should be used, the dosage and duration of treatment, and ways for the prevention, early detection, and timely intervention of SANFH are some important issues that need to be addressed. This review aims to provide a reference for health care providers in COVID-19 endemic countries and regions.

Article Focus

Hormones are a double-edged sword. This review aims to provide a reference for health care providers in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) endemic countries and regions, especially with respect to the pros and cons of corticosteroid use in the treatment of patients with COVID-19.

Key Messages

In today’s global outbreak, whether corticosteroid therapy should be used, the dosage and duration of treatment, and ways for the prevention, early detection, and timely intervention of SANFH are some important issues that need to be addressed.

Strengths and Limitations

Since SARS was mainly prevalent in China at that time, many evidences in this paper came from the reports of Chinese scholars. There is a bias in the selection of data, which may ignore the differences in environment, race, living habits, medical level and so on. SANFH may be the result of multiple factors. Whether the virus itself is an independent risk factor for SANFH has not been confirmed. In this paper, through literature retrieval, some reference opinions on glucocorticoid usage, diagnosis and treatment of SANFH are given. However, due to the lack of large-scale research data support, it can not be used as the gold standard for the above problems.

Novel MRI technique for the quantification of biochemical deterioration in steroid-induced osteonecrosis of femoral head: a prospective diagnostic trial

To explore the novel magnetic resonance imaging techniques, IVIM-DWI and IDEAL-IQ in detecting bone marrow fat and microcirculation in steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head (SIONFH). In this prospective study, 49 patients (80 hips) with SIONFH taking glucocorticoids and 24 healthy volunteers (48 hips) were recruited and assessed by T1WI, T2WI/fs, IDEAL-IQ and IVIM-DWI. The affected hips, contralateral asymptomatic hips and normal hips, as well as normal, penumbra and necrotic areas in the affected hips, were classified and evaluated. Imaging results were compared with histologic bone sections obtained from SIONFH patients undergoing surgery. The fat fraction (FF) and perfusion fraction (f) differences between groups were analyzed using analysis of variance, the LSD t-test, Pearson correlation analysis and ROC curve analysis. Our results demonstrate that IDEAL-IQ (FF) and IVIM-DWI (f) enable the classification of SIONFH at different ARCO stages. The FF was positively associated with the progression of the disease (r = 0.72), in contrast to f (r = -0.17). The FF and f were significantly different among the necrotic, penumbra and normal areas, and they were negatively correlated with each other (r = -0.37). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of IDEAL-IQ were 96.9% and 86.7%, and those of IVIM-DWI were 72.34% and 58.33%, respectively. The FF in contralateral asymptomatic hips was significantly higher than in normal hips, but no difference was found for f. IDEAL-IQ, and not IVIM-DWI, was identified to successfully detect bone marrow fat, which is beneficial to the diagnosis of the severity of SIONFH.

Exploring the Risk Factors for the Misdiagnosis of Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head: A Case-Control Study

Objective

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the present situation and risk factors for the misdiagnosis of osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH), providing the basis for accurate diagnosis of ONFH.

Methods

For this retrospective study, 1471 patients with ONFH were selected from the China Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head Database (CONFHD). These patients had been recruited between July 2016 and December 2018. According to whether or not they were misdiagnosed, the patients were divided into two groups, with 1168 cases (22–84 years old) included in the diagnosis group and 303 cases (21–80 years old) in the misdiagnosis group. Misdiagnosis was measured using the following criteria: (i) the patient had the same symptoms and signs, and the second diagnosis was not consistent with the initial diagnosis within 6 months; and (ii) the patient was admitted to a hospital participating in CONFHD and the previous diagnosis was inconsistent with the diagnosis given by the expert group. Comparisons of age, visual analogue scale for pain, and body mass index between the two groups were performed using a t‐test. Gender, causes of ONFH, primary diseases requiring corticosteroids, methods of corticosteroid use, corticosteroid species, type of trauma, onset side of the disease, pain side, whether symptoms are hidden, and type of imaging examination at the initial visit were compared using the χ²‐test. Years of alcohol consumption, weekly alcohol consumption, and physician title at the initial visit were compared using a Mann–Whitney U‐test. Furthermore, the statistically significant factors were evaluated using multiple regression analysis to investigate the risk factors of misdiagnosis.

Results

A total of 303 patients (20.6%) were misdiagnosed: 118 cases were misdiagnosed as lumbar disc herniation, 86 cases as hip synovitis, 48 cases as hip osteoarthritis, 32 cases as rheumatoid arthritis, 11 cases as piriformis syndrome, 5 cases as sciatica, and 3 cases as soft‐tissue injury. Whether symptoms are hidden (P = 0.038, odds ratio [OR] = 1.546, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.025–2.332), physician title at the initial visit (P < 0.001, OR = 3.324, 95% CI = 1.850–5.972), X‐ray examination (P < 0.001, OR = 4.742, 95% CI = 3.159–7.118), corticosteroids (P < 0.001, OR = 0.295, 95% CI = 0.163–0.534), alcohol (P < 0.001, OR = 0.305, 95% CI = 0.171–0.546), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination (P = 0.042, OR = 0.649, 95% CI = 0.427–0.985) were each found to be associated with misdiagnosis.

Conclusion

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is easily misdiagnosed as lumbar disc herniation, hip synovitis, hip osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Patient history of corticosteroid use or alcohol abuse and MRI examination at the initial diagnosis may be protective factors for misdiagnosis. Hidden symptoms, physician title at the initial visit (as attending doctor or resident doctor), and only X‐ray examination at the initial diagnosis may be risk factors for misdiagnosis.

Modified trapdoor procedures using autogenous tricortical iliac graft without preserving the broken cartilage for treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a prospective cohort study with historical controls

Background

The aim of the present study was to investigate clinical and radiological outcomes of autologous tricortical iliac grafting performed through a window created at the femoral head without suturing the opened articular cartilage for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), called modified trapdoor procedures.

Materials and methods

A total of 59 consecutive patients (67 hips; 36 males and 23 females) with ONFH were included in this study, which was conducted from April 2009 to March 2012. Patients’ age ranged from 27 to 46 years old, with a mean age of 36.3 years. Harris hip scores (HHS) were used to evaluate hip function pre- and postoperatively. Anteroposterior and frog-position X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were conducted to assess lesion location, size, and ARCO stage. Clinical failure was defined as score < 80 points or treatment by total hip arthroplasty (THA). Radiographic failure was defined as a > 3 mm of collapse in the hip. This group was retrospectively matched according to the ARCO stage, extent, location, etiology of the lesion, average age, gender, and preoperative Harris hip score to a group of 59 patients (67 hips) who underwent the “light bulb” approach between March 2007 and April 2009.

Results

Mean follow-up was 91.2 ± 13.6 months (range, 75–115 months). Mean HHS was 91.3 ± 4.5, compared with 83.1 ± 4.5 in the “light bulb” cohort at the 6-year follow-up examination (P < 0.001). At the 6-year follow-up, for modified trapdoor procedures, five hips (8.5%) were classified as clinical failure, and three hips underwent total hip arthroplasty; seven hips were classified as (10.4%) radiographic failure. The clinical and radiographic failure of the hips treated with the modified trapdoor procedure was significantly lower compared to the hips treated with the “light bulb” procedure (P < 0.05). Survival of the joint was not significantly related to the location of the femoral head lesion between two groups; however, better clinical and radiographic results were observed in modified trapdoor procedures with size C and the ARCO stage III.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated superior midterm clinical results in ONFH with the use of autologous tricortical iliac block graft through a femoral head window, without suturing the opened articular cartilage. The femoral head-preserving procedure was superior compared to the “light bulb” procedure treatment in patients with postcollapse osteonecrosis and large lesion.

Simultaneous multi-slice MR imaging of the hip at 3 T to reduce acquisition times and maintain image quality

Background

Newly developed simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) scans are now being introduced as a clinical application in neuroimaging. We examined the feasibility of SMS scans for joint imaging. The purpose of the present study was to prospectively compare the resolution and specific absorption rate (SAR) obtained using SMS to those of conventional methods in hip joint magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and establish whether imaging times may be reduced using SMS in 3 T MRI and if image quality is affected.

Methods

Twenty-one patients (4 men and 17 women, average age, 51.5 years, range: 22 to 76 years) with hip pain underwent MR examinations of the unilateral hip joint. Three board-certified radiologists independently and blindly evaluated the images obtained with and without SMS using window and level settings and magnification according to personal preferences. Individual SAR values were measured for each protocol. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a t-statistic test were used for statistical analyses. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was also compared using a phantom.

Results

SMS imaging maintained equivalent image quality to conventional imaging for evaluating the morphology of the hip joint, and also reduced imaging times by approximately 40%. SMS images had significantly higher SAR values than conventional images. The rate of difference (SMS/conventional) in SNR ranged between 80 and 111%.

Conclusions

Based on its significantly lower acquisition times and the maintenance of similar image quality to conventional imaging, SMS may be applied to morphological evaluations of hip joint disorders without significantly increasing SAR.