Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in intertrochanteric fractures: A meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials

Medullary cavity application of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss in tibial intramedullary nailing procedures-a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Studies have shown an average postoperative hidden blood loss (HBL) of 473.29 ml and an average Hb loss of 16.71 g/l after intramedullary nailing. Reducing HBL has become a primary consideration for orthopaedic surgeons.

METHODS

Patients with only tibial stem fractures who visited the study clinic between December 2019 and February 2022 were randomized into two groups using a computer-generated form. Two grams of tranexamic acid (TXA) (20 ml) or 20 ml of saline was injected into the medullary cavity before implantation of the intramedullary nail. On the morning of the surgery, as well as on days one, three and five after surgery, routine blood tests and analyses of CRP and interleukin-6 were completed. The primary outcomes were total blood loss (TBL), HBL, and blood transfusion, in which the TBL and HBL were calculated according to the Gross equation and the Nadler equation. Three months after surgery, the incidence of wound complications and thrombotic events, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, was recorded.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients (47 in the TXA group and 50 in the NS group) were analyzed; the TBL (252.10 ± 10.05 ml) and HBL (202.67 ± 11.86 ml) in the TXA group were significantly lower than the TBL (417.03 ± 14.60 ml) and HBL (373.85 ± 23.70 ml) in the NS group (p < 0.05). At the three month postoperative follow-up, two patients (4.25%) in the TXA group and three patients (6.00%) in the NS group developed deep vein thrombosis, with no significant difference in the incidence of thrombotic complications (p = 0.944). No postoperative deaths or wound complications occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of intravenous and topical TXA reduces blood loss after intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures without increasing the incidence of thrombotic events.

Early Posttraumatic Antifibrinolysis Reduces Perioperative Hidden Blood Loss in Elderly Patients with an Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of posttraumatic antifibrinolysis with multidose tranexamic acid (TXA) in reducing perioperative hidden blood loss (HBL) in elderly intertrochanteric fracture patients.

METHOD

Ninety-six elderly intertrochanteric fracture patients admitted to our department from June 2021 to September 2022 were randomized into two groups. The control group (Group A) received 100 mL of normal saline, while the experimental group (Group B) received 1.5 g of TXA intravenously q12 h from postadmission Day 1 (PAD1) to the day before surgery, and both groups received 1.5 g of TXA q12 h from postoperative Day 1 (POD1) to POD3. Haemoglobin (Hb), haematocrit (Hct), coagulation parameters, fibrinogen degradation product (FDP), and D-dimer (D-D) were recorded from PAD1 to POD3. HBL was calculated using the gross formula and recorded as the primary outcome.

RESULT

In all-over analyses, the patients in Group B had lower perioperative HBL (on PAD3, POD1, and POD3), preoperative HBL (HBLpre), decline of haemoglobin (ΔHb-on PAD3), allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) rate, FDP (on PAD3), and D-D (on PAD3) compared with Group A. No significant differences were exhibited in postoperative HBL (HBLpost) between the 2 groups. In subgroup analyses, for patients who received intervention within 24 h, the result is consistent with the whole. For patients who received intervention over 72 h of injury, there were no significant differences in perioperative HBL, ΔHb, ABT rate, FDP, and D-D between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in APTT, PT, the rate of venous thromboembolism, wound complications, or 90-day mortality between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

For elderly intertrochanteric fracture patients, early posttraumatic antifibrinolysis with multidose TXA is effective in reducing perioperative HBL, which mainly manifests as the reduction of preoperative HBL, especially for patients injured within 24 h. Application of TXA beyond 72 h of injury was ineffective.

Interventions for reducing red blood cell transfusion in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery: an overview of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Following hip fracture, people sustain an acute blood loss caused by the injury and subsequent surgery. Because the majority of hip fractures occur in older adults, blood loss may be compounded by pre-existing anaemia. Allogenic blood transfusions (ABT) may be given before, during, and after surgery to correct chronic anaemia or acute blood loss. However, there is uncertainty about the benefit-risk ratio for ABT. This is a potentially scarce resource, with availability of blood products sometimes uncertain. Other strategies from Patient Blood Management may prevent or minimise blood loss and avoid administration of ABT.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the evidence from Cochrane Reviews and other systematic reviews of randomised or quasi-randomised trials evaluating the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, administered perioperatively, on reducing blood loss, anaemia, and the need for ABT in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery.

METHODS

In January 2022, we searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and five other databases for systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions given to prevent or minimise blood loss, treat the effects of anaemia, and reduce the need for ABT, in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery. We searched for pharmacological interventions (fibrinogen, factor VIIa and factor XIII, desmopressin, antifibrinolytics, fibrin and non-fibrin sealants and glue, agents to reverse the effects of anticoagulants, erythropoiesis agents, iron, vitamin B12, and folate replacement therapy) and non-pharmacological interventions (surgical approaches to reduce or manage blood loss, intraoperative cell salvage and autologous blood transfusion, temperature management, and oxygen therapy). We used Cochrane methodology, and assessed the methodological quality of included reviews using AMSTAR 2. We assessed the degree of overlap of RCTs between reviews. Because overlap was very high, we used a hierarchical approach to select reviews from which to report data; we compared the findings of selected reviews with findings from the other reviews. Outcomes were: number of people requiring ABT, volume of transfused blood (measured as units of packed red blood cells (PRC)), postoperative delirium, adverse events, activities of daily living (ADL), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and mortality.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 26 systematic reviews including 36 RCTs (3923 participants), which only evaluated tranexamic acid and iron. We found no reviews of other pharmacological interventions or any non-pharmacological interventions. Tranexamic acid (17 reviews, 29 eligible RCTs) We selected reviews with the most recent search date, and which included data for the most outcomes. The methodological quality of these reviews was low. However, the findings were largely consistent across reviews. One review included 24 RCTs, with participants who had internal fixation or arthroplasty for different types of hip fracture. Tranexamic acid was given intravenously or topically during the perioperative period. In this review, based on a control group risk of 451 people per 1000, 194 fewer people per 1000 probably require ABT after receiving tranexamic acid (risk ratio (RR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 0.68; 21 studies, 2148 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty for possible publication bias. Review authors found that there was probably little or no difference in the risks of adverse events, reported as deep vein thrombosis (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.81; 22 studies), pulmonary embolism (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.86; 9 studies), myocardial infarction (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.23 to 4.33; 8 studies), cerebrovascular accident (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.56 to 3.70; 8 studies), or death (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.46; 10 studies). We judged evidence from these outcomes to be moderate certainty, downgraded for imprecision. Another review, with a similarly broad inclusion criteria, included 10 studies, and found that tranexamic acid probably reduces the volume of transfused PRC (0.53 fewer units, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.80; 7 studies, 813 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty because of unexplained high levels of statistical heterogeneity. No reviews reported outcomes of postoperative delirium, ADL, or HRQoL. Iron (9 reviews, 7 eligible RCTs) Whilst all reviews included studies in hip fracture populations, most also included other surgical populations. The most current, direct evidence was reported in two RCTs, with 403 participants with hip fracture; iron was given intravenously, starting preoperatively. This review did not include evidence for iron with erythropoietin. The methodological quality of this review was low. In this review, there was low-certainty evidence from two studies (403 participants) that there may be little or no difference according to whether intravenous iron was given in: the number of people who required ABT (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.11), the volume of transfused blood (MD -0.07 units of PRC, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.17), infection (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.80), or mortality within 30 days (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.13). There may be little or no difference in delirium (25 events in the iron group compared to 26 events in control group; 1 study, 303 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are very unsure whether there was any difference in HRQoL, since it was reported without an effect estimate. The findings were largely consistent across reviews. We downgraded the evidence for imprecision, because studies included few participants, and the wide CIs indicated possible benefit and harm. No reviews reported outcomes of cognitive dysfunction, ADL, or HRQoL.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Tranexamic acid probably reduces the need for ABT in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, and there is probably little or no difference in adverse events. For iron, there may be little or no difference in overall clinical effects, but this finding is limited by evidence from only a few small studies. Reviews of these treatments did not adequately include patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS), and evidence for their effectiveness remains incomplete. We were unable to effectively explore the impact of timing and route of administration between reviews. A lack of systematic reviews for other types of pharmacological or any non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the need for ABT indicates a need for further evidence syntheses to explore this. Methodologically sound evidence syntheses should include PROMS within four months of surgery.

Tranexamic Acid in Hip Hemiarthroplasty Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of Perioperative Outcome

Introduction: Implantation of a dual-head hip prosthesis to treat medial femoral neck fractures is often associated with significant blood loss. In elective endoprosthetics procedures, it has already been demonstrated that administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood loss and need for postoperative transfusions, as well as reducing the frequency of postoperative complications. The aim of this study is to show whether the administration of TXA also leads to a reduction in perioperative blood loss and haemorrhage-associated complications when applied as part of treatment of femoral neck fractures using a dual-head prosthesis. Methods: In a single-centre retrospective cohort study, 1 g TXA i.v. was administered preoperatively to 93 patients who had suffered from femoral neck fractures. This group was compared to a comparison group of 65 patients who did not receive TXA (nonTXA). Outcomes were evaluated on the basis of perioperative blood loss, frequency of transfusion, and frequency of specific complications occurring. Results: The transfusion rate in the TXA group was 6% lower, whereby the volume of blood transfused was 26.7% lower than in the nonTXA group. However, neither result was significant. The calculated perioperative blood loss remained the same. Similarly, the incidence of postoperative renal failure was not significantly lower in the TXA group, at 6.5%, as compared to the nonTXA group (7.7%). A higher rate of complications or deaths as a result of TXA administration was not observed. The tranexamic acid effect seems to be related to the dose. Conclusion: Preoperative administration of TXA during implantation of a dual-head prosthesis for treatment of a femoral neck fracture does not lead to an increased complication rate. The study revealed a trend towards fewer transfusions required, but a significant reduction in blood loss could not be demonstrated. There should be further investigation of other factors influencing blood loss, in particular the dosing regimen followed for perioperative administration of TXA. Level of Evidence: Level 4: retrospective case-control study.

Oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture undergoing proximal femur intramedullary nailing: A prospective cohort study

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

The translational potential of this article

Study protocol: haemostatic efficacy and safety of preemptive antifibrinolysis with multidose intravenous tranexamic acid in elderly hip fracture patients: design of a prospective randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Hip fracture surgery is often associated with substantial blood loss and a high allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) rate. Preoperative hidden blood loss (HBL) has been observed clinically but there is little evidence for the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) in controlling preoperative HBL. We designed a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive antifibrinolysis with multidose intravenous TXA (IV-TXA) in reducing preoperative HBL in elderly patients with hip fractures.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients older than 65 years diagnosed with primary unilateral femoral neck fracture or intertrochanteric fracture will be randomly assigned to group A (receiving 100 mL of intravenous normal saline every 12 hours preoperatively and 1.5 g of IV-TXA every 12 hours postoperatively for 3 days) or group B (receiving 1.5 g of IV-TXA every 12 hours preoperatively and 1.5 g of IV-TXA every 12 hours postoperatively for 3 days). The primary outcomes will be the hidden blood loss, haemoglobin decrease and ABT rate. The secondary outcomes include the levels of inflammatory factors (such as C reactive protein) and coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters (such as D-dimer). Other outcomes such as injury time, length of stay and hospitalisation expenses will also be compared between groups.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. The findings of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100045960.

Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid for reducing blood loss in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture treated with intramedullary fixation surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture undergoing intramedullary fixation surgery.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE for published randomized clinical trials relevant to use of TXA in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture treated with intramedullary fixation surgery. Meta-analysis was performed according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer's Hand book.

RESULTS

Five trials assessing 540 patients were included for meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that the mean total blood loss in TXA group was significant lower than that in the control group (mean difference - 172.83, 95% CI -241.43 to -104.23; p<0.00001, fixed-effect model). The intra- and postoperative transfusion rate for the TXA group was 34.4% (91/264) and for the control group was 49.27% (136/276), and the relative risk was 0.71 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.97; p<0.03, random-effect model) with substantial heterogeneity (I2=63%, p=0.03). The overall incidence of thrombotic events was 6.43% (17/264) in the intravenous TXA group, 7.63% (21/275) in the control group, with no significant difference (relative risk 0.84, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.54; p=0.57, fixed-effect model).

CONCLUSION

The present evidence shows that TXA can significantly reduce total and hidden blood loss, transfusion rate, and do not increase the risk of thrombotic events in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture undergoing intramedullary fixation surgery. However, the impact of TXA on thrombotic events needs to be researched in more high-quality, large-sample randomized clinical trials.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I Therapeutic Study.

Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intertrochanteric fracture (ITF) is a common type of injury, and nearly 30% of ITF patients die in the first 12 mo, especially the elderly with limited activity. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been widely used in reducing traumatic and surgical bleeding, however, the paucity of studies regarding its use in orthopedic trauma surgery has limited its integration into this field, which may benefit most from TXA. The safety of TXA in this group has not achieved a consensus.

AIM

This meta-analysis was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of TXA in elderly ITF patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

Databases, including Medline and PubMed, were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were published before October 2018 and that addressed the efficacy and safety of TXA in patients who underwent ITF surgery. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 Statement Checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of each study. Trials without and with heterogeneity were compared by fixed-effects analysis and random-effects analysis, respectively. For each study, odds ratio (OR) and 95%CI and mean differences and 95%CI were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. The Power and Sample Size Program software was used to calculate power and sample size. Stability of the results was assessed via sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 836 patients from eight RCTs were subjected to meta-analysis. TXA treatment compared with the control group significantly reduced postoperative blood loss (95%CI, -20.83 to -7.93 mL, P < 0.0001), hidden blood loss (95%CI, -213.67 to -64.43 mL, P = 0.0003), and total blood loss (95%CI, -332.49 to -23.18 mL, P = 0.02) by weighted mean differences of -14.38, -139.05, and -177.83 mL, respectively. However, no significant difference was observed between groups for analysis of intraoperative blood loss. The meta-analysis also proved that the usage of TXA in ITFs may not significantly increase the incidence of deep venous thrombosis. Allogeneic blood transfusion data showed that significantly fewer patients in the TXA group (42%) required transfusion than the control group (95%CI, 0.36 to 0.69; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In ITF surgery, intravenous administration of TXA reduces the risk of hidden blood loss and the need for allogeneic transfusion, without increasing thrombotic risk.

Tranexamic Acid in the Treatment of Hip Fractures: A Clinical Review

INTRODUCTION

Although regularly used as a method to reduce blood loss in elective orthopedic procedures (e.g., total hip and knee arthroplasty), there currently is little evidence concerning the optimal dosage, timing and route for the use of tranexamic acid to reduce postoperative blood loss in hip fracture repair.

SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE

The current literature suggests that tranexamic acid may be used to reduce postoperative blood loss in addition to reducing the risk of requiring blood transfusions following the surgical repair of hip fractures. Furthermore, it may have the potential to improve patient outcomes and decrease the overall costs of caring for this patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to truly gauge the effect of tranexamic acid on long-term patient outcomes and hospital costs.

Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid for Blood Salvage in Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

The use of tranexamic acid (TXA) for reducing blood loss in intertrochanteric fracture (IF) surgery remains controversial. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TXA in reducing transfusion requirements and blood loss for IF surgery. Databases, including PubMED, Cochrane, and Embase, were searched for RCTs that were published before February 2018 and that addressed the efficacy and safety of TXA in patients who underwent IF surgery. A total of 746 patients from 7 RCTs were subjected to meta-analysis. The results showed that TXA group had reduced surgical blood loss (weighted mean difference [WMD] = −37.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −48.70 to −25.77, P <.00001), reduced total blood loss (WMD = −199.08, 95% CI: −305.16 to −93.01, P = .0002), higher postoperative hemoglobin (WMD = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.79, P = .007), and hematocrit levels (WMD = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.64 to 2.47, P = .008) compared to control group, while no significant differences were found in transfusion rates (relative risk [RR] = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.11, P = .15), postoperative drainage (WMD = −38.82, 95% CI: −86.87 to 9.22, P = .11), and thromboembolic events (RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.41 to 2.19, P = .89). In patients undergoing IF surgery, the administration of TXA significantly reduced surgical blood loss and total blood loss, while it had no significant effect on transfusion rate, postoperative drainage, and the risk of thromboembolic events. Nevertheless, due to the variations in the included studies, additional RCTs are required to further validate these conclusions.

Influence of tranexamic acid on cerebral hemorrhage: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Tranexamic acid might be beneficial for cerebral hemorrhage. However, the results remained controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of tranexamic acid on cerebral hemorrhage. PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of tranexamic acid on cerebral hemorrhage were included. Two investigators independently searched articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model. Seven RCTs involving 1702 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control intervention in cerebral hemorrhage, tranexamic acid could significantly reduce growth of hemorrhagic mass (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.61-0.99; P = 0.04) and unfavorable outcome (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.61-0.93; P = 0.008), but demonstrated no substantial influence on volume of hemorrhagic lesion (Std. MD = -0.10; 95% CI = -0.27 to 0.08; P = 0.28), neurologic deterioration (RR = 1.25; 95% CI = 0.60-2.60; P = 0.56), rebleeding (RR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.35-1.09; P = 0.10), surgery requirement (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.40-1.51; P = 0.46), and mortality (RR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.69-1.05; P = 0.14). Compared to control intervention in cerebral hemorrhage, tranexamic acid was found to significantly decrease growth of hemorrhagic mass and unfavorable outcome, but showed no notable impact on volume of hemorrhagic lesion, neurologic deterioration, rebleeding, surgery requirement and mortality.