Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on contrast induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome

The Effect of SGLT2 Inhibitors on the Development of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Diabetic Patients with Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background and Objectives: Percutaneous procedures using contrast agents are modern diagnosis and treatment methods for cardiovascular diseases. Contrast use may cause nephropathy, especially in diabetic patients. SGLT2 inhibitors have strong cardioprotective and renal protective effects. In our study, we investigated the effectiveness of this drug group in preventing the development of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy (CIN). Materials and Methods: The results of 312 diabetic patients who underwent CAG were analyzed. The study group included 104 DM patients using SGLT2 and the control group did not use SGLT2. These groups were compared with each other in terms of clinical, demographic, and laboratory parameters. Results: The groups were similar characteristics. However, post-CAG creatinine values compared with before the procedure, the development of CIN was observed to be significantly less in the group using SGLT2 inhibitor (p = 0.03). When the results of the multivariate analysis were examined, it was seen that the use of SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of CIN (odds ratio (OR): 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0,142-0.966, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Our study showed that SGLT2 inhibitors may be protective against the development of CIN, especially in patients with comorbid conditions such as diabetes.

Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy - A randomized control trial

Background

There is a lack of sufficient data regarding the protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in patients at risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Thus, this study was conducted to determine whether RIPC as an adjunct to standard therapy prevents CIN in high-risk patients undergoing coronary intervention.

Methods

In a single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 162 patients who were at risk of CIN received standard hydration combined with RIPC or hydration with sham preconditioning. RIPC was accomplished by four cycles of 5 min ischemia and 5 min reperfusion of the forearm. The primary endpoint was a rise in serum creatinine (>0.5 mg/dL or >25%) from baseline to serum creatinine 48–72 h after contrast administration.

Results

Of the 162 patients, 81 were randomly allocated to receive sham preconditioning and 81 to receive RIPC. Significantly reduced serum creatinine levels were observed in patients with a Mehran moderate risk allocated to sham group compared to the RIPC group (0.070 ± 0.16 mg/dL vs. 0.107 ± 0.13 mg/dL, p = 0.001). With regards to the primary endpoint, a significantly higher change in serum creatinine from baseline to 48–72 h was observed in the sham group compared to the RIPC group (0.023 ± 0.2 μmol/L vs −0.064 ± 0.1 μmol/L, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

RIPC as an alternative to standard therapy, improved serum creatinine levels after contrast administration in patients at risk of CIN. However, present data indicate that RIPC might have beneficial effects in patients with a moderate or high risk of CIN.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a common cause of hospital-acquired AKI and a serious complication of percutaneous coronary intervention.

Objective

The aim of the present study was to assess whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduces the incidence of CI-AKI.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled clinical study. The study included 101 patients admitted to the Intensive Cardiac Therapy Clinic of Medical University of Lodz for elective percutaneous coronary intervention. The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either a control group (n = 51) or an RIPC group (n = 50). In the latter, RIPC was achieved before percutaneous coronary intervention by 4 cycles of 5-minute inflation of a cuff on the left upper arm to 200 mm Hg followed by 5-minute deflation. In the control group, a deflated cuff was placed on the left arm for 40 minutes. Serum creatinine concentration was measured to check for the presence of CI-AKI within 48 to 72 hours of percutaneous coronary intervention. Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin level was also measured within 3 hours.

Results

CI-AKI occurred in 2 patients from the RIPC group (4%) and 3 patients from the control group (5.9%), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.98). The patients who developed CI-AKI also demonstrated increased serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentrations (the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.938–1.00; P < 0.00) and the optimal cutoff point value was 118.9 ng/mL.

Conclusions

The use of RIPC before elective percutaneous coronary intervention was not found to prevent CI-AKI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03761368. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020; 81:XXX–XXX)

Effects of Remote Ischemic Pre-Conditioning to Prevent Contrast-Induced Nephropathy after Intravenous Contrast Medium Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

We aimed to assess the effects of remote ischemic pre-conditioning (RIPC) on the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after an intravenous (IV) or intra-arterial injection of contrast medium (CM) in patient and control groups.

Materials and Methods

This prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial included 26 patients who were hospitalized for the evaluation of the feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and underwent investigations including contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), with Mehran risk scores greater than or equal to six. All the patients underwent four cycles of five minute-blood pressure cuff inflation followed by five minutes of total deflation. In the RIPC group (n = 13), the cuff was inflated to 50 mm Hg above the patient's systolic blood pressure (SBP); in the control group (n = 13), it was inflated to 10 mm Hg below the patient's SBP. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of CIN. Additionally, variation in the serum levels of cystatin C was assessed.

Results

One case of CIN was observed in the control group, whereas no cases were detected in the RIPC group (p = 0.48, analysis of 25 patients). Mean creatinine values at the baseline, 24 hours after injection of CM, and 48 hours after injection of CM were 88 ± 32 µmol/L, 91 ± 28 µmol/L and 82 ± 29 µmol/L, respectively (p = 0.73) in the RIPC group, whereas in the control group, they were 100 ± 36 µmol/L, 110 ± 36 µmol/L, and 105 ± 34 µmol/L, respectively (p = 0.78). Cystatin C values (median [Q1, Q3]) at the baseline, 24 hours after injection of CM, and 48 hours after injection of CM were 1.10 [1.08, 1.18] mg/L, 1.17 [0.97, 1.35] mg/L, and 1.12 [0.99, 1.24] mg/L, respectively (p = 0.88) in the RIPC group, whereas they were 1.11 [0.97, 1.28] mg/L, 1.13 [1.08, 1.25] mg/L, and 1.16 [1.03, 1.31] mg/L, respectively (p = 0.93), in the control group.

Conclusion

The risk of CIN after an IV injection of CM is very low in patients with Mehran risk score greater than or equal to six and even in the patients who are unable to receive preventive hyperhydration. Hence, the Mehran risk score may not be an appropriate method for the estimation of the risk of CIN after IV CM injection.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Reduces the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients with Moderate Renal Impairment Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Angiography: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary angiography (PCI/CA).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effect of RIPC on CIN in patients undergoing PCI/CA. The main outcomes of interest were the incidence of CIN 48-72 h after CA, the levels of serum creatinine, cystatin C, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), mortality, and requirement of hemodialysis and rehospitalization. The analysis was conducted using the random-effect model due to the expected heterogeneity among different studies.

RESULTS

In total, 16 trials covering 2,048 patients were identified. By assessing the methodological quality of the included studies through the Coch-rane risk of bias, we found that of the 16 RCTs, 3 had a low risk of bias, 6 a high, and 7 an unclear risk. The application of RIPC decreased the incidence of CIN (relative risk, RR, 0.50, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.39-0.65; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that RIPC decreased the incidence of CIN in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.75; p < 0.001) but not in patients with eGRF ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.35-1.94; p = 0.66) at baseline. Furthermore, the increase in serum creatinine was significantly lower in patients with RIPC compared to control patients (standardized mean difference -1.41, 95% CI -2.46 to -0.35; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on 16 RCTs, this meta-analysis shows that RIPC can reduce the risk of CIN in patients with moderate renal impairment undergoing PCI/CA. However, this needs to be confirmed by further high-quality evidence.

Repeated Remote Ischemic Conditioning Reduces Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity

Objectives

This study investigated the cardioprotective effect of repeated remote ischemic preconditioning (rRIC) on doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in mice.

Background

Doxorubicin is an effective chemotherapeutic agent for a wide range of tumor types but its use and dosing are limited by acute and chronic cardiotoxicity. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is cardioprotective in multiple cardiovascular injury models, but the effectiveness of rRIC in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity has not been fully elucidated.

Methods

rRIC was performed on mice before and after doxorubicin administration. Cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography and myocardial biology was tested by molecular approaches.

Results

Doxorubicin administration induced acute cardiotoxicity, as indicated by reduced cardiac function, reduced myocyte cross-section area and increased extracellular collagen deposition, increased circulating cardiac muscle damage markers, and decreased heart weight. Doxorubicin also adversely affected other organs, including the kidney, liver, and spleen, as evaluated by circulating markers or organ weight loss. rRIC not only abrogated doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity (left ventricular ejection fraction, doxorubicin 47.5 ± 1.1%, doxorubicin + rRIC 51.6 ± 0.7%, p = 0.017), but also was associated with multiorgan protection. Within the myocardium, rRIC attenuated doxorubicin-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis, reduced inflammation, and increased autophagy signaling.

Conclusions

rRIC may be a promising approach to reduce doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.

The efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy among patients undergoing coronary angiography or intervention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Numerous trials have investigated the effect of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in preventing contrast‐induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients receiving contrast medium (CM). This meta analysis aims to validate the role of RIC in preventing CIN.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before April 27, 2019. Two investigators independently extracted basic characteristics from each study. Odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to examine the treatment effect.

Results

A total of 18 studies comprising 2,503 patients were included in our meta‐analysis. Compared with conventional therapy, RIC significantly reduced the risk of CIN (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.56, p < .05). Subgroup analyses showed that the protective effect of RIC was stronger in the low‐osmolar contrast media group (OR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.45, p < .05) and the nondiabetic group (OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.53 p < .05). RIC also significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events within the first 6 months (OR = 0.39; p < .05), but the influence was not present after long‐term follow‐up.

Conclusions

Our meta‐analysis showed that RIC could effectively reduce CIN risk and decrease the short‐term incidence of relevant adverse events. Furthermore, the effects of CIN are more pronounced in nondiabetic patients and with the use of low‐osmolar contrast medium. This meta‐analysis of small trials suggests a possible protective effect of RIC on contrast‐induced nephropathy and favors the performance of a large randomized trial to further investigate this strategy.

Early Renal-Protective Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Elderly Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)

Background

With the wide clinical application of angiography, contrast-enhanced nephropathy (CIN) has become the third-leading cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a non-fatal ischemia-reperfusion injury that can provide protection against lethal ischemia-reperfusion. This study aimed to assess the effect of RIPC on CIN in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

Material/Methods

Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups with 119 patients in each group treated with interventional therapy. Patients in the RIPC group received distal ischemic preconditioning 2 h before contrast exposure, while patients in the control group received a sham RIPC procedure. Incidence of CIN was the primary outcome. Changes in creatinine, NGAL, and KIM-1 after contrast administration were secondary outcomes.

Results

CIN occurred in a total of 27 (12.3%) patients, including 12 (10.1%) in the RIPC group and 15 (15.1%) in the control group (P=0.329). RIPC treatment significantly reduced the levels of NGAL (P=0.024) and KIM-1 (P=0.007) at 12 h after contrast administration, suggesting RIPC treatment reduces sub-clinical renal damage. Subgroup analysis revealed that significant reduction of KIM-1 and NGAL by RIPC, mainly occurring in patients with a Mehran risk score of 6–10.

Conclusions

Although RIPC did not significantly reduce CIN incidence in elderly patients with NSTEMI, the application of more sensitive biomarkers – NGAL and KIM-1 – indicated a reduction of sub-clinical renal damage by RIPC, especially in the early stage of injury. As a simple and well-tolerated method, RIPC may be a potentially feasible option to prevent CIN.