Research progress of asymptomatic bacteriuria before arthroplasty: A systematic review

Introduction of a New Protocol to Limit the Number of Cancelled Elective Orthopaedic Operations Due to Asymptomatic Bacteriuria

Background Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) poses a significant diagnostic dilemma for medical professionals. Current hospital screening protocol determines the likelihood of a positive diagnosis of a urinary tract infection (UTI) based on the results of a bedside urinalysis. ASB, defined as a positive urine culture in the absence of symptoms, can contribute to unnecessary cancellations, poor utilisation of theatre time, and delayed patient care. We present a two-cycle audit proposing a new pathway to addressing ASB in patients awaiting elective orthopaedic surgery, aiming to optimise surgical yield. Our objectives are to identify areas for improvement in our departmental practices with respect to asymptomatic bacteria compared to the published literature. We propose a new protocol targeted to improve our current practices to minimise patient cancellations and optimise theatre utilisation. Methodology A total of 78 patients who had an elective orthopaedic procedure cancelled at a large district general hospital offering tertiary orthopaedic services, between two study periods spanning March 2018 to April 2019 and May 2019 to March 2020, were identified from electronic hospital records and theatre management systems. Demographics, procedure details, and reasons for cancellations, including the result of urinalysis and the presence of UTI symptoms were assessed. Our pathway was introduced after the first study period and, subsequently, re-audited to assess adherence to the new protocol and its effect on cancellations. Results We identified 78 patients, with a 50:50 male:female split and an average age of 63 (range = 9-90). Of the 33 patients in the first cohort, seven (21.2%) were cancelled due to UTI risk based on positive urinalysis. Of these seven cancellations, one (14.3%) patient reported symptoms of a UTI. The second cohort comprised 45 patients, two (4.4%) of whom were cancelled due to UTI risk based on symptom questionnaire results. These two symptomatic patients along with another two asymptomatic patients (8.8% in total) were found to have positive urinalyses; however, the two asymptomatic patients had their operations cancelled for unrelated reasons. Conclusions The study has shown that previously of all patients awaiting elective orthopaedic operations who had their procedures cancelled, 85.7% were cancelled due to ASB. After the introduction of a new protocol focussing on symptoms rather than urinalysis, we estimate that the number of cancelled elective orthopaedic operations has reduced by 71.4%, thereby greatly improving the utilisation of theatre time.

Is there variation in utilization of preoperative tests among patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement in the US, and does it affect outcomes? A population-based analysis

Study objective

To describe recent practice patterns of preoperative tests and to examine their association with 90-day all-cause readmissions and length of stay.

Design

Retrospective cohort study using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS).

Setting

SPARCS from March 1, 2016, to July 1, 2017.

Participants

Adults undergoing Total Hip Replacement (THR) or Total Knee Replacement (TKR) had a preoperative screening outpatient visit within two months before their surgery.

Interventions

Electrocardiogram (EKG), chest X-ray, and seven preoperative laboratory tests (RBCs antibody screen, Prothrombin time (PT) and Thromboplastin time, Metabolic Panel, Complete Blood Count (CBC), Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Nasal DNA probe, Urinalysis, Urine culture) were identified.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Regression analyses were utilized to determine the association between each preoperative test and two postoperative outcomes (90-day all-cause readmission and length of stay). Regression models adjusted for hospital-level random effects, patient demographics, insurance, hospital TKR, THR surgical volume, and comorbidities. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the subset of patients with no comorbidities.

Results

Fifty-five thousand ninety-nine patients (60% Female, mean age 66.1+/− 9.8 SD) were included. The most common tests were metabolic panel (74.5%), CBC (66.8%), and RBC antibody screen (58.8%). The least common tests were MRSA Nasal DNA probe (13.0%), EKG (11.7%), urine culture (10.7%), and chest X-ray (7.9%). Carrying out MRSA testing, urine culture, and EKG was associated with a lower likelihood of 90-day all-cause readmissions. The length of hospital stay was not associated with carrying out any preoperative tests. Results were similar in the subset with no comorbidities.

Conclusions

Wide variation exists in preoperative tests before THR and TKR. We identified three preoperative tests that may play a role in reducing readmissions. Further investigation is needed to evaluate these findings using more granular clinical data.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05945-y.

Proximal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly: A Few Things to Know, and Some to Forget

Hip fractures are a leading cause of hospitalisation in elderly patients, representing an increasing socioeconomic problem arising from demographic changes, considering the increased number of elderly people in our countries. Adequate peri-operative treatment is essential to decrease mortality rates and avoid complications. Modern management should involve a coordinated multidisciplinary approach, early surgery, pain treatment, balanced fluid therapy, and prevention of delirium, to improve patients' functional and clinical outcomes. The operative treatment for intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures is intramedullary nail or sliding/dynamic hip screw (DHS) on the basis of the morphology of the fracture. In the case of neck fractures, total hip replacement (THR) or hemiarthroplasty are recommended. However, several topics remain debated, such as the optimum thromboprophylaxis to reduce venous thromboembolism or the use of bone cement. Postoperatively, patients can benefit from early mobilisation and geriatric multidisciplinary care. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, a prolonged time to operation with a subsequent increased complication rate have burdened frail and elderly patients with hip fractures. Future studies are needed with the aim to investigate better strategies to improve nutrition, postoperative mobility, to clarify the role of home-based rehabilitation, and to identify the ideal analgesic treatment and adequate tools in case of patients with cognitive impairment.

Preoperative bacteriuria positivity on urinalysis increases wound complications in primary total hip arthroplasty regardless of the urine culture result

BACKGROUND

Current evidence does not recommend screening urine culture and curing asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) before joint arthroplasty. The bacteriuria count on pre-operative urinalysis is a more common clinical parameter. We aimed to investigate whether the bacteriuria count on preoperative urinalysis can increase postoperative wound complications in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study that included patients who underwent primary THA in our institution from 2012 to 2018. We obtained preoperative urinalysis results before THA during the same hospitalization and identified patients with abnormal urinalysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were first generated to evaluate the predicted value of leukocyte esterase (LE), nitrite, bacteriuria, and pyuria in the urinalysis for superficial wound infection. Then, all included patients were divided into two groups according to the preoperative urinalysis: a bacteriuria-positive group and a bacteriuria-negative group. The primary outcome was the superficial wound infection rate within 3 months postoperatively, and the secondary outcomes included wound leakage, prosthetic joint infection (PJI), pulmonary infection, urinary tract infection (UTI), readmission rate within 3 months postoperatively, and length of stay (LOS) during hospitalization. We utilized univariable analyses to compare the outcomes between the two groups. A multivariable logistic regression model was generated to explore the potential association between bacteriuria and the risk of superficial wound infection, wound leakage, and readmission rate controlling for baseline values.

RESULTS

A total of 963 patients were included in the study. One hundred sixty patients had abnormal urinalysis. The AUCs for LE, nitrite, bacteriuria, and pyuria were 0.507 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.315 to 0.698), 0.551 (0.347 to 0.756), 0.675 (0.467 to 0.882), and 0.529 (0.331 to 0.728), respectively. Bacteriuria was diagnostically superior to LE, nitrite, and pyuria. Among the 963 patients, 95 had a positive bacteriuria on preoperative urinalysis, and only 9 (9.5%) had a positive urine culture. Compared with the bacteriuria-negative group, the bacteriuria-positive group had a higher superficial wound infection rate (4.2% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.008), higher wound leakage rate (11.6% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.007), higher readmission rate (5.3% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.015) within 3 months postoperatively and longer LOS (6.19 ± 2.89 days vs. 5.58 ± 2.14 days, P = 0.011). After adjustment, the bacteriuria-positive group had a significantly increased risk of superficial wound infection (OR = 7.587, 95%CI: 2.002 to 28.755, P = 0.003), wound leakage (OR = 3.044, 95%CI: 1.461 to 6.342, P = 0.003), and readmission (OR = 4.410, 95%CI: 1.485 to 13.097, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative bacteriuria positivity on urinalysis significantly increased the risk of postoperative wound complications, readmission, and LOS in primary THA regardless of the result of the urine culture. Urinalysis is a fast and cost-acceptable test whose advantages have been underestimated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, observational study.

Management of proximal femur fractures in the elderly: current concepts and treatment options

As one of the leading causes of elderly patients’ hospitalisation, proximal femur fractures (PFFs) will present an increasing socioeconomic problem in the near future. This is a result of the demographic change that is expressed by the increasing proportion of elderly people in society. Peri-operative management must be handled attentively to avoid complications and decrease mortality rates. To deal with the exceptional needs of the elderly, the development of orthogeriatric centres to support orthogeriatric co-management is mandatory. Adequate pain medication, balanced fluid management, delirium prevention and the operative treatment choice based on comorbidities, individual demands and biological rather than chronological age, all deserve particular attention to improve patients’ outcomes. The operative management of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures favours intramedullary nailing. For femoral neck fractures, the Garden classification is used to differentiate between non-displaced and displaced fractures. Osteosynthesis is suitable for biologically young patients with non-dislocated fractures, whereas total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty are the main options for biologically old patients and displaced fractures. In bedridden patients, osteosynthesis might be an option to establish transferability from bed to chair and the restroom. Postoperatively, the patients benefit from early mobilisation and early geriatric care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, prolonged time until surgery and thus an increased rate of complications took a toll on frail patients with PFFs. This review aims to offer surgical guidelines for the treatment of PFFs in the elderly with a focus on pitfalls and challenges particularly relevant to frail patients.

Urinary Self-Catheterization is Not Associated with Increased Risk of Major Complications Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to evaluate urinary self-catheterization as a potential risk factor for postoperative complications following total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty procedures.

METHODS

Self-catheterization patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty from 2005 to 2014 were identified in a national insurance database. Rates of death, hospital readmission, emergency room visit, infection, revision, and dislocation for THA or arthrofibrosis for TKA were calculated, as well as cost and length of stay. Self-catheterizing patients were then compared to a 4:1 matched control cohort using a logistic regression analysis to control for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients underwent THA, and 128 patients who underwent TKA and who actively self-catheterized at the time of surgery were identified. Self-catheterization was not associated with infection, emergency room visits, readmissions, revision surgery, arthrofibrosis, or cost compared to the 4:1 matched control cohort. However, self-catheterization was associated with significantly longer length of stay (difference for THA = 1.91 days, confidence interval = 0.97-2.86, P < .001; difference for TKA = 0.61, odds ratio = 0.16-1.06, P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Self-catheterization does not appear to be associated with increased risk of major complications following total joint arthroplasty with the numbers available in this study. Reassurance can be given regarding concerns for infection and other complications following surgery in this patient population.

Improving Value of Care: Cessation of Screening Urine Culture Prior to Orthopedic and Spinal Surgery

Objective

To assess the impact of cessation of screening urine cultures on surgical site infection (SSI) incidence in clinical practice.

Patients and Methods

Our study included patients undergoing hip replacement, knee replacement, spinal fusion, and laminectomy 12 months before (preintervention) and after (postintervention) cessation of preoperative screening urine cultures on June 1, 2017, at our institution. Urine cultures and urinalyses performed within 30 days before surgery during the 12 months before and after cessation were reviewed. SSI surveillance was performed in accordance with the methods of the National Healthcare Safety Network.

Results

A total of 2754 patients were included (1286 preintervention and 1468 postintervention). In the preintervention period, 1141 urine cultures were performed, compared to 153 in the postintervention period; 35 and 6 episodes of asymptomatic bacteriuria were treated, respectively. The occurrence of SSI did not differ noticeably between time periods (1.2% vs 0.7%, P=.24), and quarterly incidences of SSI were unchanged. The rate of SSI was significantly lower in the postintervention period for laminectomy (3.0% vs 0.3%, P=.02).

Conclusion

An 86.6% (153 vs 1141) reduction in screening urine cultures over a 12-month period was associated with a reduction of 988 unnecessary urine cultures, an 82.8% (6 vs 35) decline in inappropriate antibiotic treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria, and no increase in SSI incidence after hip replacement, knee replacement, spinal fusion, or laminectomy procedures. No value of screening urine cultures before clean surgery was identified.

Is Routine Urinary Screening Indicated Prior To Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty, and prevention is of great importance. The genitourinary tract is a potential source of bacterial seeding and one that can be easily managed. Despite little supportive evidence, routine urine screening and subsequent treatment before elective surgery in patients without symptoms has found its way into clinical practice in many countries. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to ascertain whether asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a risk factor for PJI and if so, whether preoperative antibiotic treatment is effective in reducing its risk.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane databases were searched using a systematic strategy. Selection of papers was exclusive to include only those which offered information about PJI rate specifically in patients with or without asymptomatic abnormal urinalysis or bacteriuria and/or information on whether ASB patients were preoperatively treated with antibiotics or not to be included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Six-hundred sixty-three papers were screened, and 10 papers were ultimately included (28,588 patients). Results show an increased risk of developing PJI among ASB patients (odds ratio = 3.64, 95% confidence interval = 1.40-9.42). However, most PJI microorganisms are unrelated to those previously found in the urine and preoperative antibiotic therapy does not influence PJI risk (odds ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval = 0.39-2.44).

CONCLUSION

Routine urinary screening prior to elective total joint arthroplasty and treatment of asymptomatic patients is not recommended.

Should a Urinary Tract Infection Be Treated before a Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most serious complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The prevalence of urinary tract infection (UTI) is common, particularly among elderly women, a group for whom TJA may be required. The association between preoperative UTI and increased risk of PJI after TJA is unclear. We reviewed key articles concerning the relationship between UTIs and PJI, and summarized recommendations of international consensus on PJI, which was established in Philadelphia in July of 2018. In addition, we distinguish between symptomatic UTI and asymptomatic bacteriuria, because their causative effects on PJI are quite different.