Efficacy and safety of apatinib in advance osteosarcoma with pulmonary metastases: A single-center observational study

In vivo self-assembly and delivery of VEGFR2 siRNA-encapsulated small extracellular vesicles for lung metastatic osteosarcoma therapy

The prognosis of lung metastatic osteosarcoma (OS) remains disappointing. siRNA-based gene silencing of VEGFR2 is a promising treatment strategy for lung metastatic OS, but there is a lack of safe and efficient delivery systems to encapsulate siRNAs for in vivo administration. This study presented a synthetic biological strategy that remolds the host liver with synthesized genetic circuits for efficient in vivo VEGFR2 siRNA delivery. After being taken-up by hepatocytes, the genetic circuit (in the form of a DNA plasmid) reprogrammed the liver to drive the autonomous intrahepatic assembly and encapsulation of VEGFR2 siRNAs into secretory small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), thus allowing for the transport of self-assembled VEGFR2 siRNAs towards the lung. The results showed that our strategy was superior to the positive medicine (Apatinib) for OS lung metastasis in terms of therapeutic efficacy and toxic adverse effects and may provide a feasible and viable therapeutic solution for lung metastatic OS.

Incidence, survival, and associated factors estimation in osteosarcoma patients with lung metastasis: a single-center experience of 11 years in Tianjin, China

BACKGROUND

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor. The current study was conducted to describe the general condition of patients with primary osteosarcoma in a single cancer center in Tianjin, China and to investigate the associated factors in osteosarcoma patients with lung metastasis.

METHODS

From February 2009 to October 2020, patients from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, China were retrospectively analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the overall survival of osteosarcoma patients. The Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to analyze the prognostic factors of all osteosarcoma patients and those patients with lung metastasis, respectively. Furthermore, risk factors for developing lung metastasis were identified in synchronous lung metastasis (SLM) and metachronous lung metastasis (MLM) patients.

RESULTS

A total of 203 patients were involved and 150 patients were successfully followed up for survival status. The 5-year survival rate of osteosarcoma was 70.0% and the survival months for patients with SLM and MLM were 33.3 ± 12.6 and 45.8 ± 7.4 months, respectively. The presence of lung metastasis was one of the independent prognostic factors for prognosis of osteosarcoma. In patients with lung metastasis, twenty-one (10.3%) showed lung metastasis at the diagnosis of osteosarcoma and 67 (33%) were diagnosed with lung metastases during the later course. T3 stage (OR = 11.415, 95%CI 1.362-95.677, P = 0.025) and bone metastasis (OR = 6.437, 95%CI 1.69-24.51, P = 0.006) were risk factors of SLM occurrence. Bone metastasis (OR = 1.842, 95%CI 1.053-3.224, P = 0.032), good necrosis (≥ 90%, OR = 0.032, 95%CI 0.050-0.412, P < 0.001), elevated Ki-67 (OR = 2.958, 95%CI 1.098-7.969, P = 0.032) and elevated LDH (OR = 1.791, 95%CI 1.020-3.146, P = 0.043) were proved to be independent risk factors for developing MLM.

CONCLUSION

The overall survival, prognostic factors and risk factors for lung metastasis in this single center provided insight about osteosarcoma management.

Real-World Data on Cabozantinib in Advanced Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma Patients: A Study from the Hellenic Group of Sarcoma and Rare Cancers

Advanced osteosarcomas (OSs) and Ewing sarcomas (ESs) tend to have poor prognosis with limited therapeutic options beyond first-line therapy. Aberrant angiogenesis and MET signaling play an important role in preclinical models. The anti-angiogenic drug cabozantinib was tested in a phase 2 trial of advanced OS and ES and was associated with clinical benefits. We retrospectively analyzed the off-label use of cabozantinib in adult patients with advanced OS and ES/primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) in three centers of the Hellenic Group of Sarcoma and Rare Cancers (HGSRC). Between April 2019 and January 2022, 16 patients started taking 60 mg of cabozantinib for advanced bone sarcoma or PNET. Median age at cabozantinib initiation was 31 years (17-83). All patients had received peri-operative chemotherapy for primary sarcoma and between 0 and 4 lines of treatment (median; 2.5) for advanced disease. The most common adverse effects included fatigue, anorexia, hypertransaminasemia, weight loss, and diarrhea. One toxic death was noted (cerebral hemorrhage). Dose reduction to 40 mg was required in 31.3% of the patients. No objective response was noted, and 9/16 patients exhibited stable disease outcomes. Progression-free survival varied from 1 to 8 (median; 5) months. Our study demonstrates that cabozantinib has antitumor activity in this population. In the real-life setting, we observed similar adverse events as in the CABONE study and in other neoplasms.

Activity and safety of apatinib monotherapy or apatinib combined with chemotherapy for patients with metastatic or unresectable osteosarcoma over the age of 40 years: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteosarcoma commonly develops during childhood and adolescence. Only one-third of osteosarcoma patients have been clinically detected over the age of 40 years, and the survivorship of those patients is quite dismal. Apatinib, a novel multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor, has shown a short-term efficacy in advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma. However, the data for apatinib in the older patients with osteosarcoma are limited. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with chemotherapy versus apatinib monotherapy in the treatment of patients over 40 years old with metastatic or unresectable osteosarcoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the patients with metastatic osteosarcoma who were treated with apatinib monotherapy or apatinib combined with chemotherapy between May 2015 and December 2018 in the Department of Orthopedics at West China Hospital. Apatinib was initially administered with a dose of 500 mg daily, and the dose was adjusted according to toxicity. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. The treatment-related adverse events and the safety of apatinib were also documented.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients (28 men, 17 women) with metastatic or unresectable osteosarcoma were finally included, and 41 patients received at least one cycle of treatment and were evaluable for efficacy. Of 41 patients, 24 who were intolerant to intensive chemotherapy or have failed standard chemotherapy received apatinib monotherapy, and 17 patients were treated with apatinib plus chemotherapy. The median PFS and median OS were longer in the group treated with apatinib combined with chemotherapy than those of the apatinib monotherapy group (5.6 months vs. 2.6 months; 15.1 months vs. 9.7 months). Moreover, the median DOR was significantly prolonged in the group treated with apatinib combined with chemotherapy compared with that in the monotherapy group.

CONCLUSION

Apatinib demonstrated promising activity in patients over 40 years old with metastatic or unresectable osteosarcoma. The combination of apatinib and chemotherapy conferred a durable response compared with apatinib monotherapy, which might be an alternative therapeutic strategy for the management of osteosarcoma in older patients.

Current research progress in targeted anti-angiogenesis therapy for osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumour with a peak in incidence during adolescence. Delayed patient presentation and diagnosis is common with approximately 15% of OS patients presenting with metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. With the introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the 1970s, disease prognosis improved from 17% to 60%-70% 5-year survival, but outcomes have not significantly improved since then. Novel and innovative therapeutic strategies are urgently needed as an adjunct to conventional treatment modalities to improve outcomes for OS patients. Angiogenesis is crucial for tumour growth, metastasis and invasion, and its prevention will ultimately inhibit tumour growth and metastasis. Dysregulation of angiogenesis in bone microenvironment involving osteoblasts and osteoclasts might contribute to OS development. This review summarizes existing knowledge regarding pre-clinical and developmental research of targeted anti-angiogenic therapy for OS with the aim of highlighting the limitations associated with this application. Targeted anti-angiogenic therapies include monoclonal antibody to VEGF (bevacizumab), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Sorafenib, Apatinib, Pazopanib and Regorafenib) and human recombinant endostatin (Endostar). However, considering the safety and efficacy of these targeted anti-angiogenesis therapies in clinical trials cannot be guaranteed at this point, further research is needed to completely understand and characterize targeted anti-angiogenesis therapy in OS.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib in the treatment of osteosarcoma: a single-arm meta-analysis among Chinese patients

Background

Osteosarcoma is a relatively rare malignant tumor with a high incidence in young people. The development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has brought the treatment of osteosarcoma into a new stage. Apatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor specifically targeting VEGFR2, has been increasingly reported as a treatment for osteosarcoma with promising outcome parameters, but there has been no systematic analysis of the treatment of osteosarcoma by apatinib.

Methods

A single-arm meta-analysis was performed, and published literature from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wan Fang databases as of March 1, 2021 was systematically retrieved. Quality assessment is carried out in accordance with a 20 item checklist form prepared by the Institute of Health Economics (IHE). Double arcsine transformation is performed to stabilize the variance of the original ratio. When I² > 50%, the random effect model is used to calculate the pooled parameters; otherwise, the fixed effect model is used. We conducted subgroup analysis according to age and apatinib dose.

Results

This meta-analysis included 11 studies of 356 Chinese patients with osteosarcoma. The pooled objective remission rate (ORR) of advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma treated by oral apatinib in Chinese patients was 0.27(95%CI = 0.18–0.38). The pooled disease control rate (DCR) was 0.57 (95%CI = 0.42–0.72). The pooled median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median total survival (mOS) were 5.18 months (95%CI = 4.03–6.33) and 10.87 months (95% CI = 9.40–12.33), respectively. More than 70% of adverse reactions were mild, the most common adverse reaction was hand-foot syndrome (HFMD), with an incidence of 0.46 (95%CI = 0.35–0.58), the second was hypertension, with an incidence of 0.40 (95%CI = 0.29–0.51).

Conclusions

The efficacy of apatinib in the treatment of osteosarcoma is competitive with current evidence, and it is worth noting that its low cost can significantly improve patient compliance and increase therapeutic value.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib in advanced sarcoma: an open-label, nonrandomized, single-center study of 45 patients

Sarcoma is a rare tumor with more than 50 histologic subtypes. Patients with advanced sarcoma have a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor, as salvage treatment for advanced bone and soft tissue sarcomas. From May 2017 to July 2018, a prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, clinical trial of apatinib was carried out in selected patients with advanced sarcoma. After apatinib dosing, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, disease control rate, and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reviewed and evaluated. Patients were administered apatinib for at least 1 month. Median follow-up time was 6.00 months (1-13 months). The median PFS was 7.88 months, with the longest PFS of 13 months observed in a patient with epithelial sarcoma. The 3-month PFS rate was 66.44%. The median OS was 11.64 months with significant differences observed based on disease subtypes. Four patients achieved a partial response, and 36 patients achieved stable disease. The objective response rate was 8.88% (4/45), and the disease control rate was 88.89% (40/45). The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were hypertension (12.50%), hand-foot syndrome (6.67%), diarrhea (12.50%), fatigue (6.25%), and proteinuria (14.29%). One drug-related severe AE of thrombocytopenia (21×10/l) occurred 2 months after therapy. Apatinib treatment in our study exhibited objective efficacy in PFS, OS, and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced sarcoma. This result supports future randomized controlled trials to further define apatinib activity in stage IV sarcomas.

Current Treatment Considerations for Osteosarcoma Metastatic at Presentation

Approximately one-fourth of osteosarcoma patients have metastases at presentation. The best treatment options for these patients include chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy; however, the optimal scheme has not yet been defined. Standard chemotherapy for osteosarcoma metastatic at presentation is based on high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (the MAP regimen), with the possible addition of ifosfamide. Surgical treatment continues to be fundamental; complete surgical resection of all sites of disease (primary and metastatic) remains essential for survival. In patients whose tumors do not respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, early surgical resection of the primary tumor with limb-salvage surgery or amputation and multiple metastasectomies, if feasible, after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy is a reasonable option, as the reduction of the tumor volume could probably increase the effect of chemotherapy. Advanced radiotherapy techniques, such as carbon ion radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, and molecular targeted chemo-therapy with drugs such as pazopanib or apatinib have improved the dismal prognosis, especially for patients who are medically inoperable or who refuse surgery. Given that the presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis of a patient with osteosarcoma is a poor prognostic factor, a multidisciplinary approach by surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiotherapists is important. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5):e345-e358.].

Identification of Lysosome-Associated Protein Transmembrane-4 as a Novel Therapeutic Target for Osteosarcoma Treatment

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to evaluate the expression of lysosome-associated protein transmembrane-4 (LAPTM4B) in human osteosarcoma tissue samples collected in our hospital, and to explore the possible correlations between the clinical pathological features of osteosarcoma patients and LAPTM4B expression.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical (IHC) assays were performed to detect the expression levels of LAPTM4B in 62 tissue samples of osteosarcoma tissues and corresponding non-tumor tissues. According to LAPTM4B staining intensity in tumor tissues, osteosarcoma patients were classified into LAPTM4B high expression and low expression groups. In addition, the potential correlations between LAPTM4B expression levels and clinical pathological features were evaluated. In addition, we detected the effects of LAPTM4B on the proliferation and invasion of esteosarcoma cells through colony formation assay and transwell assay, respectively. We further explored the potential effects of LAPTM4B on tumor growth and metastasis using in vivo animal model.

RESULTS

We revealed that LAPTM4B was highly expressed in human osteosarcoma tissues. We determined the significance between LAPTM4B and clinical features, including the tumor size (P = 0.004*) and the clinical stage (P = 0.035*) of osteosarcoma patients. Our results further demonstrated that ablation of LAPTM4B obviously blocked the proliferation and invasion of osteosarcoma cells in vitro and restrained tumor growth and metastasis in mice.

CONCLUSION

We investigated the potential involvement of LAPTM4B in osteosarcoma progression and confirmed LAPTM4B as a novel therapeutic target for osteosarcoma.

Apatinib as targeted therapy for advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a dilemma of reversing multidrug resistance while suffering drug resistance itself

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare malignant tumors originated from mesenchymal tissues. They harbor more than 50 distinct subtypes and differ in pathological features and clinical courses. Despite the significant improvements in modern multi-modality treatment, the outcomes and overall survival rates remain poor for patients with advanced, refractory, metastatic, or relapsed diseases. The growth and metastasis of bone and soft tissue sarcoma largely depend on angiogenesis, and VEGF/VEGFR pathway is considered as the most prominent player in angiogenesis. Therefore, blockade of VEGF/VEGFR pathways is a promising therapeutic strategy to retard neovascularization. Several VEGFR inhibitors have been developed and revealed their favorable anti-neoplastic effects in various cancers, but such desirable anti-tumor effects are not obtained in advanced sarcomas because of multiple reasons, such as drug tolerance, short duration of response, and severe adverse effects. Fortunately, preclinical and clinical studies have indicated that apatinib is a novel promising VEGFR2 inhibitor showing potent anti-angiogenic and anti-neoplastic activities in advanced sarcomas. Especially, apatinib has showed notable characteristics in multidrug resistance reversal, tumor regression, vascular normalization, immunosuppression alleviation, and enhancement of chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic effects. However, apatinib also gets struck in dilemma of reversing multidrug resistance of chemotherapeutic agents while suffering drug resistance itself, and several difficulties should be tackled before full use of apatinib. In this review, we discuss the outstanding characteristics and main predicaments of apatinib as targeted therapy in advanced sarcomas. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare but malignant tumors originated from mesenchymal tissues. They harbor more than 100 distinct subtypes and differ in features of pathologies and clinical courses. Despite the significant improvements in modern multi-modality treatment, the outcomes and overall survival rates remain poor for patients with advanced, refractory, metastatic, or relapsed lesions. The growth and metastasis of bone and soft tissue sarcoma largely depend on angiogenesis and VEGF/VEGFR pathways play a pivotal role in angiogenesis. Therefore, blockade of VEGF/VEGFR pathways is a promising therapeutic strategy. Several VEGFR inhibitors have been developed and verified in clinical trials but with unfavorable outcomes. Fortunately, preclinical studies and clinical trials have indicated that apatinib is a novel promising VEGFR2 inhibitor showing potent anti-angiogenic and anti-neoplastic activities in advanced sarcomas. Actually, apatinib has showed notable characteristics in multidrug resistance reversal, tumor regression, vascular normalization, immunosuppression alleviation, enhancement of chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic effects. However, apatinib also gets struck in dilemma of reversing multidrug resistance of chemotherapeutic agents while suffering drug resistance itself, and several difficulties should be tackled before full use of apatinib. In this review, we discuss the outstanding characteristics and main predicaments of apatinib as targeted therapy in advanced sarcomas.

Retrospective review of the activity and safety of apatinib and anlotinib in patients with advanced osteosarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma

Background Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of apatinib and anlotinib for the treatment of sarcomas. However, more clinical data and evidence are needed to support clinical treatment selection and study design. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of these two drugs for the treatment of sarcomas. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of 110 patients with advanced osteosarcoma (n = 32) or soft tissue sarcoma (STS, n = 78) who received oral apatinib or anlotinib therapy during May 2016–February 2019 at two centers. Patients were divided into the apatinib and anlotinib groups. Results Among osteosarcoma patients, the objective response rates (ORRs) for the apatinib and anlotinib groups were 15.79% (3/19) and 7.69% (1/13), respectively. The disease control rates (DCRs) were 63.16% (12/19) and 30.77% (4/13), and the median progression-free survival (m-PFS) was 4.67 ± 3.01 and 2.67 ± 1.60 months, respectively. Among STS patients, ORRs for the apatinib and anlotinib groups were 12.24% (6/49) and 13.79% (4/29), respectively. The DCRs were 59.18% (29/49) and 55.17% (16/29), and m-PFS was 7.82 ± 6.90 and 6.03 ± 4.50 months, respectively. Regarding adverse events (AEs), apatinib was associated with a higher incidence of hair hypopigmentation and pneumothorax, while anlotinib was associated with a higher incidence of pharyngalgia or hoarseness. Conclusion Both apatinib and anlotinib were effective for the treatment of sarcomas. However, the effectiveness of the two drugs and associated AEs varied based on the histological type of sarcoma. These differences may be due to their different sensitivities to targets such as RET, warranting further study.

Apatinib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: A Phase II, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Prospective Study

Purpose

Treatment options for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (RR DLBCL) represent an unmet medical need. Apatinib is a new oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor mainly targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) to inhibit tumour angiogenesis. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of apatinib for patients with RR DLBCL.

Patients and Methods

In this phase II, open-label, single-arm, prospective study, we enrolled patients aged 14–70 years with treatment failure of at least two chemotherapeutic regimens using Simon’s two-stage design. All patients were administered apatinib at an initial dose of 500 mg on a 4-week cycle at home and visited the outpatient clinic every two cycles to evaluate efficacy and to record adverse events. We considered objective response rate (ORR) as the primary end point, and progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) plus duration of response (DoR) as the secondary end point. (This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03376958.).

Results

From January 2017 to February 2019, we screened 35 patients and enrolled 32 eligible patients. At the cutoff point (April 2019), we noted 2 (6.3%) complete responses, 12 (37.5%) partial responses, and 9 (28.1%) stable diseases, attributing to an ORR of 43.8% and a disease control rate of 71.9%. The median PFS and OS were 6.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8–7.9) and 7.9 months (95% CI, 7.0–8.7), respectively. The median DoR was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.5–6.5) for patients who achieved PR. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events (AE) were hypertension (12.6%), hand–foot syndrome (9.4%), and leucopenia (6.3%). No apatinib-related deaths were noted.

Conclusion

Home administration of apatinib shows promising efficacy and manageable AEs in patients with RR DLBCL.

Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Osteosarcoma: 2019 Update

The primary conclusions of our 2014 contribution to this series were as follows: Multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) likely contribute to aggressive phenotypes in osteosarcoma and, therefore, inhibition of multiple RTKs is likely necessary for successful clinical outcomes. Inhibition of multiple RTKs may also be useful to overcome resistance to inhibitors of individual RTKs as well as resistance to conventional chemotherapies. Different combinations of RTKs are likely important in individual patients. AXL, EPHB2, FGFR2, IGF1R, and RET were identified as promising therapeutic targets by our in vitro phosphoproteomic/siRNA screen of 42 RTKs in the highly metastatic LM7 and 143B human osteosarcoma cell lines. This chapter is intended to provide an update on these topics as well as the large number of osteosarcoma clinical studies of inhibitors of multiple tyrosine kinases (multi-TKIs) that were recently published.

An update on emerging drugs in osteosarcoma: towards tailored therapies?

Introduction: Current treatment of conventional and non-conventional high-grade osteosarcoma (HGOS) is based on the surgical removal of primary tumor and, when possible, of metastases and local reccurrence, together with systemic pre- and post-operative chemotherapy with drugs that have been used since decades. Areas covered: This review is intended to summarize the new agents and therapeutic strategies that are under clinical evaluation in HGOS, with the aim to increase the cure probability of this highly malignant bone tumor, which has not significantly improved during the last 30-40 years. The list of drugs, compounds and treatment modalities presented and discussed here has been generated by considering only those that are included in presently ongoing and recruiting clinical trials, or which have been completed in the last 2 years with reported results, on the basis of the information obtained from different and continuously updated databases. Expert opinion: Despite HGOS is a rare tumor, several clinical trials are presently evaluating different treatment strategies, which may hopefully positively impact on the outcome of patients who experience unfavorable prognosis when treated with conventional therapies.