The risk factors of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis: A case report and review

Linezolid Toxicity: A Clinical Case Report

Linezolid plays a clinically important role; however, it is responsible for severe pharmacological interactions and side effects, such as myelosuppression, serotonin syndrome, and lactic acidosis. We report a case of an 80-year-old man treated with venlafaxine for depression. He was admitted with a right femur fracture and submitted to surgical intervention, complicated by local infection. In collected pus was identified multiple microorganisms including Enterococcus faecium resistant to vancomycin. The therapeutic was adjusted to linezolid. On the 36th day of treatment, he developed hypertension, poor peripheral perfusion, and generalized tremor. He was disoriented, with marbled skin, myoclonus, and sinus tachycardia; and apyretic, with no signs of respiratory distress or joint/surgical wound inflammatory signs. Blood tests showed hyperlacticemia and discrete elevation of C-reactive protein but in a decrescent trend, with no other relevant alterations. The diagnosis of lactic acidosis and probable serotonin syndrome secondary to linezolid was made, supported by improvement after the drug suspension.

Linezolid-induced lactic acidosis

Linezolid is a commonly prescribed antibiotic in clinical practice. Although thrombocytopenia and peripheral neuropathy are frequently encountered following prolonged administration of linezolid, lactic acidosis is a rare adverse drug reaction. We present the case of a patient on linezolid for disseminated multidrug-resistant tuberculosis who presented with vomiting, dyspnoea, hypotension and high anion gap metabolic acidosis. The initial presentation mimicked sepsis syndrome. Ketoacidosis and renal dysfunction were ruled out. There was no history of ingestion of toxins/toxic alcohols. Sepsis was unlikely because extensive radiological and microbiological testing could not identify an infection. Given the possibility of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis (LILA), linezolid was discontinued on admission. The patient's lactic acidosis resolved, and his overall condition improved. A retrospective diagnosis of LILA was thus established. LILA should be considered when patients on linezolid present with lactic acidosis and other causes for the lactic acidosis have been ruled out.

Towards a better detection of patients at-risk of linezolid toxicity in clinical practice: a prospective study in three Belgian hospital centers

Introduction: Linezolid is a last-resort antibiotic for infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms. It is widely used for off-label indications and for longer than recommended treatment durations, exposing patients at higher risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), notably thrombocytopenia. This study aimed to investigate ADR incidence and risk factors, identify thrombocytopenia-related trough levels based on treatment duration, and evaluate the performance of predictive scores for ADR development. Methods: Adult in- and outpatients undergoing linezolid therapy were enrolled in three hospitals and ADRs and linezolid trough levels prospectively monitored over time. A population pharmacokinetic (pop-PK model) was used to estimate trough levels for blood samples collected at varying times. Results: A multivariate analysis based on 63 treatments identified treatment duration ≥10 days and trough levels >8 mg/L as independent risk factors of developing thrombocytopenia, with high trough values correlated with impaired renal function. Five patients treated for >28 days did not develop thrombocytopenia but maintained trough values in the target range (<8 mg/L). The Buzelé predictive score, which combines an age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index with treatment duration, demonstrated 77% specificity and 67% sensitivity to predict the risk of ADR. Conclusion: Our work supports the necessity of establishing guidelines for dose adjustment in patients with renal insufficiency and the systematic use of TDM in patients at-risk in order to keep trough values ≤8 mg/L. The Buzelé predictive score (if ≥7) may help to detect these at-risk patients, and pop-PK models can estimate trough levels based on plasma samples collected at varying times, reducing the logistical burden of TDM in clinical practice.

Fosfomycin Enhances the Inhibition Ability of Linezolid Against Biofilms of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium in vitro

Purpose

We explored the inhibition ability of linezolid/fosfomycin combination against biofilms of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) and tried to provide a theoretical basis for the treatment of VREfm biofilm-associated infections.

Methods

Four clinical isolates of VREfm (No.2, No.4, No.5, and No.6) were used for this study, which were collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. The checkerboard method was used to assess the synergistic effect of linezolid and fosfomycin. The inhibition ability of biofilm biomass was evaluated by crystal violet staining, and the metabolic activity was tested by an Alamar blue cell viability assay. Changes in biofilm formation-related genes of the strains after incubating with drugs were investigated via the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

Results

The fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) showed that linezolid combined with fosfomycin had a synergistic effect on all four VREfm isolates. Compared with linezolid monotherapy, linezolid combined with fosfomycin led to a significant decrease in biofilm biomass and metabolic activity, especially in the mature biofilm. The results of RT-qPCR showed linezolid combined with fosfomycin inhibition biofilm formation through the inhibition of cylA, ebpA, and gelE transcription in VREfm in the initial and mature stages. To the mature biofilm, the combination also reduced the expression of asa1, atlA, and esp.

Conclusion

The combination of linezolid and fosfomycin represented stronger inhibitory effect on the biofilm formation of VREfm than linezolid alone.

Favorable clinical outcomes and anti-mycobacterial efficacy of pretomanid in patients with highly resistant tuberculosis: A review

Rising cases of drug resistance of mycobacterium species are one of the biggest concerns when the goal is to eradicate TB (Tuberculosis) from the world by the year 2030. A limited number of treatment options as MTB (Mycobacterium tuberculosis) is getting resistant to anti-mycobacterial drugs either due to a patient's non-compliance towards treatment regimen or if a patient is infected by drug-resistant species of MTB. This review aims to assess the effectiveness of pretomanid, a recently approved drug for the treatment of extensively drug-resistant TB. A thorough search of databases like PubMed, Cochrane library, CDC, Research Gate, and Google scholar was used in order to find case reports and clinical trials providing data on the efficacy of pretomanid in different drug regimens. According to research trials conducted, the drug appears to be efficacious, safe, and well-tolerable. Only headache was the most frequently observed adverse drug event, and a high dose-related increase in serum creatinine level was seen, which came to normal after the drug was discontinued.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure alters linezolid pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with continuous hemodialysis: an observational study

BACKGROUND

In acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), adequate antibiotic dosing is challenging due to changes of drug distribution and elimination. We studied the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in critically ill patients with ACLF during continuous renal replacement therapy compared to patients without concomitant liver failure (NLF).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, patients received linezolid 600 mg bid. Linezolid serum samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed followed by Monte-Carlo simulations of 150 mg bid, 300 mg bid, 450 mg bid, 600 mg bid, and 900 mg bid to assess trough concentration target attainment of 2-7 mg/L.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included in this study with nine suffering from ACLF. Linezolid body clearance was lower in the ACLF group with mean (standard deviation) 1.54 (0.52) L/h versus 6.26 (2.43) L/h for NLF, P < 0.001. A trough concentration of 2-7 mg/L was reached with the standard dose of 600 mg bid in the NLF group in 47%, with 42% being underexposed and 11% overexposed versus 20% in the ACLF group with 77% overexposed and 3% underexposed. The highest probability of target exposure was attained with 600 mg bid in the NLF group and 150 mg bid in the ACLF group with 53%.

CONCLUSION

Linezolid body clearance in ACLF was markedly lower than in NLF. Given the overall high variability, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with dose adjustments seems required to optimize target attainment. Until TDM results are available, a dose reduction may be considered in ACLF patients to prevent overexposure.

Infant Exposure to Antituberculosis Drugs via Breast Milk and Assessment of Potential Adverse Effects in Breastfed Infants: Critical Review of Data

Infants of mothers treated for tuberculosis might be exposed to drugs via breast milk. The existing information on the exposure of breastfed infants lacks a critical review of the published data. We aimed to evaluate the quality of the existing data on antituberculosis (anti-TB) drug concentrations in the plasma and milk as a methodologically sound basis for the potential risk of breastfeeding under therapy. We performed a systematic search in PubMed for bedaquiline, clofazimine, cycloserine/terizidone, levofloxacin, linezolid, pretomanid/pa824, pyrazinamide, streptomycin, ethambutol, rifampicin and isoniazid, supplemented with update references found in LactMed^®. We calculated the external infant exposure (EID) for each drug and compared it with the recommended WHO dose for infants (relative external infant dose) and assessed their potential to elicit adverse effects in the breastfed infant. Breast milk concentration data were mainly not satisfactory to properly estimate the EID. Most of the studies suffer from limitations in the sample collection, quantity, timing and study design. Infant plasma concentrations are extremely scarce and very little data exist documenting the clinical outcome in exposed infants. Concerns for potential adverse effects in breastfed infants could be ruled out for bedaquiline, cycloserine/terizidone, linezolid and pyrazinamide. Adequate studies should be performed covering the scenario in treated mothers, breast milk and infants.

Adverse drug reactions due to linezolid in the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis in India: A retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Monitoring and managing adverse drug reactions (ADR) are critical for treating drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB).

OBJECTIVE

To study symptomatic, linezolid-attributable ADRs in TB patients initiated on all oral longer bedaquiline-based treatment regime for multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant (MDR/RR)-TB under programmatic conditions.

METHODS

It was a multicenter, retrospective study of people with MDR/RR-TB in nine TB units in Nagpur, India, from March 2020 to April 2022.

RESULTS

The study consisted of a sample size of 106 individuals with multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis out of a total of 110 individuals with the disease. Of these, 45 (42.45%) experienced linezolid ADRs, with an incidence of 11.37 cases per 1000 person-weeks. These patients were significantly younger (31.24 ± 11.13 years) and more likely to be female (27, 50%) than those without ADRs. ADR severity was mild in 20 (44.45%), moderate in 15 (33.33%), and severe in 10 (22.22%) patients. The most common ADR was peripheral neuropathy (42, 93.33%), followed by lactic acidosis (3, 6.67%), anemia (2, 4.44%), and optic neuritis (2, 4.44%). Dosing was reduced in 17 (37.78%) patients, and linezolid was withdrawn entirely in 19 (42.22%) patients. Only 9 (20%) patients continued linezolid unmodified. For mild to moderate linezolid-associated symptomatic peripheral neuropathy, symptom management with or without dose reduction is an effective strategy; however, immediate linezolid withdrawal is necessary in severe or life-threatening peripheral neuropathy cases. After a mean follow-up of 41 ± 21.33 weeks, ADR symptoms resolved completely in 4 (6.67%) patients and decreased in 42 (93.33%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Linezolid ADRs, often neuropathy, frequently occur in patients on an all-oral bedaquiline-based treatment regime for MDR/RR-TB. Women and younger patients are more likely to experience these ADRs, usually mild to moderate in severity. Management of symptomatic linezolid-associated peripheral neuropathy should be based on ADR severity. These ADRs often affect linezolid dosing, so it is important to identify and manage them early.

Mitochondrial toxicity induced by linezolid causing lactic acidosis

Linezolid-induced lactic acidosis is a rare, but life-threatening complication of a commonly used drug. Patients present with persistent lactic acidosis, hypoglycaemia, high central venous oxygen saturation and shock. Linezolid causes mitochondrial toxicity due to impaired oxidative phosphorylation. This is evidenced by cytoplasmic vacuolations in the myeloid and erythroid precursors of bone marrow smear as illustrated in our case. Discontinuation of the drug, administration of thiamine and haemodialysis reduces lactic acid levels.

Development of a prehospital lactic acidosis score for early-mortality. A prospective, multicenter, ambulance-based, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Lactic acidosis is a clinical status related to clinical worsening. Actually, higher levels of lactate is a well-established trigger of emergency situations. The aim of this work is to build-up a prehospital early warning score to predict 2-day mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission, constructed with other components of the lactic acidosis besides the lactate.

METHODS

Prospective, multicenter, observational, derivation-validation cohort study of adults evacuated by ambulance and admitted to emergency department with acute diseases, between January 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2021. Including six advanced life support, thirty-eight basic life support units, referring to four hospitals (Spain). The primary and secondary outcome of the study were 2-day all-cause mortality and ICU-admission. The prehospital lactic acidosis (PLA) score was derived from the analysis of prehospital blood parameters associated with the outcome using a logistic regression. The calibration, clinical utility, and discrimination of PLA were determined and compared to the performance of each component of the score alone.

RESULTS

A total of 3334 patients were enrolled. The final PLA score included: lactate, pCO2, and pH. For 2-day mortality, the PLA showed an AUC of 0.941 (95%CI: 0.914-0.967), a better performance in calibration, and a higher net benefit as compared to the other score components alone. For the ICU admission, the PLA only showed a better performance for AUC: 0.75 (95%CI: 0.706-0.794).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that PLA predicts 2-day mortality better than other lactic acidosis components alone. Including PLA score in prehospital setting could improve emergency services decision-making.

Acute Onset Lactic Acidosis Secondary to Linezolid

Linezolid has been the mainstay of treatment for multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria. Common adverse effects with linezolid include diarrhea, nausea, headache, and bone marrow suppression. A less common and understudied side effect is lactic acidosis. This study describes a 19-year-old man with linezolid-induced lactic acidosis (LILA). The patient was admitted for the management of acute decompensated systolic heart failure, which improved on guideline-directed medication therapy (GDMT). During hospitalization, he developed an erythematous weeping cellulitis infection of his right lower extremity and was started on linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours with wound and blood cultures collected. After one day of treatment with linezolid, lactic acid levels acutely increased from 1.8 mmol/L to 5 mmol/L without any other interventions. Suspecting possible LILA, linezolid was transitioned to cephalexin with a reduction of lactic acid to 2.4 mmol/L, one day following linezolid cessation. After two days of linezolid cessation, lactic acid levels decreased to 1.9 mmol/L. Lactic acidosis can have profound hemodynamic consequences for patients, including death. A meta-analysis study of 35 articles with 47 patients (28 males, 18 females, and one non-binary) was done, which found a 25.5% mortality rate associated with LILA. Due to this high mortality, having a greater understanding of the associated risk factors with LILA is very important. This case study aims to inform clinicians of the potential harmful side effects associated with linezolid, as well as the understudied risk factors involved in LILA that are needed to prevent its occurrence.

Safety Profile of Linezolid in Older Adults With Renal Impairment: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

The objective of this study was to characterize the safety profile of linezolid in patients with renal impairment compared with patients without renal impairment.

Methods

A population-based retrospective cohort study using linked administrative databases included patients aged 66 years or older in Ontario, Canadawho were prescribed linezolid from 2014 to 2021. Renal impairment was defined using baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m² or receipt of dialysis. The primary outcomes were change in platelet count and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50 × 10⁹/L) within 90 days. Secondary outcomes included bleeding, neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, optic neuropathy, acidosis, serotonin syndrome, and mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting on propensity score was used to balance comparison groups on baseline health.

Results

Of 625 patients, 98 (15.7%) patients had renal impairment. The mean (SD) platelet change was -88.3 (108.4) 10⁹/L in the renal impairment group and -76.5 (109.8) 10⁹/L in the no renal impairment group, with an adjusted mean difference of -29.4 (95% CI, -53.4 to -5.3; P = .0165). Severe thrombocytopenia occurred in 9.2% for the renal impairment group and 5.9% for the no renal impairment group, with an adjusted risk difference of 2.7% (95% CI, -3.1% to 8.6%; P = .3655). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

Patients with renal impairment on linezolid therapy had a larger decrease in platelet count, but their risks for severe thrombocytopenia and bleeding were not significantly different than patients without renal impairment. Linezolid is likely safe in renal impairment without dose adjustment or drug level monitoring.

Clinical and molecular findings in 37 Turkish patients with isolated methylmalonic acidemia

Background/aim

Isolated methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) is caused by complete or partial deficiency of the enzyme methylmalonyl- CoA mutase (mut0 or mut– enzymatic subtype), a defect of its cofactor adenosyl-cobalamin (cblA, cblB, or cblD-MMA), or deficiency of the enzyme methylmalonyl-CoA epimerase. While onset of the disease ranges from the neonatal period to adulthood, most cases present with lethargy, vomiting and ketoacidosis in the early infancy. Major secondary complications are; growth failure, developmental delay, interstitial nephritis with progressive renal failure, basal ganglia injury and cardiomyopathy. We aimed to demonstrate clinical and molecular findings based on long-term follow up in our patient cohort.

Materials and methods

The study includes 37 Turkish patients with isolated MMA who were followed up for long term complications 1 to 14 years. All patients were followed up regularly with clinical, biochemical and dietary monitoring to determine long term complications. Next Generation Sequencing technique was used for mutation screening in five disease-causing genes including; MUT, MMAA, MMAB, MMADHC, MCEE genes. Mutation screening identified 30 different types of mutations.

Results

While 28 of these mutations were previously reported, one novel MMAA mutation p.H382Pfs*24 (c.1145delA) and one novel MUT mutation IVS3+1G>T(c.752+1G>T) has been reported. The most common clinical complications were growth retardation, renal involvement, mental motor retardation and developmental delay. Furthermore, one of our patients developed cardiomyopathy, another one died because of hepatic failure and one presented with lactic acidosis after linezolid exposure.

Conclusion

We have detected two novel mutations, including one splice-site mutation in the MUT gene and one frame shift mutation in the MMAA gene in 37 Turkish patients. We confirm the genotype-phenotype correlation in the study population according to the long-term complications.

Clinical Use and Adverse Drug Reactions of Linezolid: A Retrospective Study in Four Belgian Hospital Centers

In Belgium, linezolid is indicated for pneumonia and skin and soft tissue infections, but is more broadly used, due to its oral bioavailability and activity against multiresistant organisms. This could increase the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADR), notably hematological disorders (anemia, thrombocytopenia), neuropathy, or lactic acidosis. We analyzed linezolid clinical use in relationship with occurrence of ADR in Belgian hospitals and highlighted risk factors associated with the development of thrombocytopenia. A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records and laboratory tests of adult patients treated with linezolid in four Belgian hospitals in 2016 allowed the collection of ADR for 248 linezolid treatments. Only 19.7% of indications were in-label. ADR included 43 thrombocytopenia, 17 anemia, 4 neuropathies, and 4 increases in lactatemia. In a multi-variate analysis, risk factors of thrombocytopenia were a treatment duration > 10 days, a glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min, and a Charlson index ≥ 4. Off-label use of linezolid is frequent in Belgium, and ADR more frequent than reported in the summary of product characteristics, but not statistically associated with any indication. This high prevalence of ADR could be related to a high proportion of patients presenting risk factors in our population, highlighting the importance of detecting them prospectively.

Incidence and Associated Risk Factors for Lactic Acidosis Induced by Linezolid Therapy in a Case-Control Study in Patients Older Than 85 Years

Background: Serum lactic acid is considered a prognostic indicator in critically ill patients. However, studies on linezolid-induced lactic acidosis (LILA) are still limited. Individuals older than 85 years old (very elderly) have limited capacity for organ compensation, and LILA data from these patients are lacking. In this study, we evaluated the risk factors for LILA in patients older than 85 years and established a risk prediction model for geriatric practice.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, blood gas analysis data and arterial lactate levels were monitored in patients older than 85 years during the use of teicoplanin or linezolid. After propensity score matching analyses, we compared the incidence of lactic acidosis between the teicoplanin and linezolid therapy groups and identified the risk factors of LILA.

Results: The incidence of lactic acidosis was found to be much lower in the group receiving teicoplanin than those receiving linezolid therapy (0 vs. 35.7%; p < 0.0001). A duration of linezolid therapy ≥ 9 days [odds ratio (OR), 3.541; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.161–10.793; p = 0.026], an arterial blood glucose level ≥ 8 mmol/L (OR, 4.548; 95% CI, 1.507–13.725; p = 0.007), and a high sequential organ failure assessment score (OR, 1.429; 95% CI, 1.213–1.685; p < 0.0001) were risk factors for LILA. The constructed risk model could be used to predict LILA (area under the curve, 0.849; specificity, 65.1%; sensitivity, 91.4%, with a negative predictive value of 93.2% and a positive predictive value of 59.3%).

Conclusions: LILA can occur in patients older than 85 years after a relatively shorter duration of linezolid therapy. Therefore, close monitoring of blood gas and arterial lactate levels during linezolid therapy in the very elderly population is necessary.

Ribosome-Targeting Antibiotics Impair T Cell Effector Function and Ameliorate Autoimmunity by Blocking Mitochondrial Protein Synthesis

While antibiotics are intended to specifically target bacteria, most are known to affect host cell physiology. In addition, some antibiotic classes are reported as immunosuppressive for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we show that Linezolid, a ribosomal-targeting antibiotic (RAbo), effectively blocked the course of a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease. Linezolid and other RAbos were strong inhibitors of T helper-17 cell effector function in vitro, showing that this effect was independent of their antibiotic activity. Perturbing mitochondrial translation in differentiating T cells, either with RAbos or through the inhibition of mitochondrial elongation factor G1 (mEF-G1) progressively compromised the integrity of the electron transport chain. Ultimately, this led to deficient oxidative phosphorylation, diminishing nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide concentrations and impairing cytokine production in differentiating T cells. In accordance, mice lacking mEF-G1 in T cells were protected from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, demonstrating that this pathway is crucial in maintaining T cell function and pathogenicity.

A Case of Linezolid Toxicity Presenting as a Sepsis Mimic

Linezolid is an efficacious and well tolerated antimicrobial but can have serious adverse effects including myelo-suppression, serotonin syndrome, neuropathy, hypoglycemia, liver dysfunction, and lactic acidosis. The side effects are generally duration dependent; linezolid use is not recommended for more than 28 days. Case. A 59-year-old female presented with malaise, loss of appetite, and altered mentation. She had multiple medical comorbidities and required long-term anticoagulation with warfarin for venous thromboembolism. She had multiple medication allergies. Prior to admission, she was on linezolid for cellulitis of foot due to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). On physical exam, she was drowsy and required endotracheal intubation for airway protection. Initial laboratory parameters showed lactic acidosis, thrombocytopenia, supra-therapeutic coagulation profile, low blood glucose, and transaminitis. Her altered mentation was due to hypoglycemia. The interaction with warfarin led to altered coagulation profile. She developed shock and vasopressors were initiated. Given her presentation, she was managed as severe sepsis. There were no active infectious foci attributing to decline of her clinical status. Linezolid was discontinued and she was managed with intravenous polymyxin B, aztreonam, and vancomycin. Her hemodynamic status improved within one day. She was extubated on Day 5 of her presentation. Her laboratory parameters showed gradual improvement over 12 days after discontinuation of linezolid. Retrospective evaluation revealed linezolid toxicity as possible cause of presentation. Linezolid toxicity can present as sepsis mimic and should be considered as a differential diagnosis while managing sepsis with other antimicrobial agents.