Computed tomography color mapping for evaluation of bone ongrowth on the surface of a titanium-coated polyetheretherketone cage in vivo: A pilot study

Feasibility of the Non-Window-Type 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensionally printed titanium (3D-Ti) cages can be divided into 2 types: window-type cages, which have a void for bone graft, and non-window-type cages without a void. Few studies have investigated the necessity of a void for bone graft in fusion surgery. Therefore, the present study assessed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of window and non-window-type 3D-Ti cages in single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

METHODS

A total of 70 patients were randomly assigned to receive either a window or non-window cage; 61 patients (87%) completed final follow-up (32 from the window cage group, 29 from the non-window cage group). Radiographic outcomes, including fusion rates, subsidence, and intra-cage osseointegration patterns, were assessed. Intra-cage osseointegration was measured using the intra-cage bridging bone score for the window cage group and the surface osseointegration ratio score for the non-window cage group. Additionally, we looked for the presence of the trabecular bone remodeling (TBR) sign on computed tomography (CT) images.

RESULTS

Of the 61 patients, 58 achieved interbody fusion, resulting in a 95.1% fusion rate. The fusion rate in the non-window cage group was comparable to, and not significantly different from, that in the window cage group (96.6% and 93.8%, p > 0.99). The subsidence rate showed no significant difference between the window and non-window cage groups (15.6% and 3.4%, respectively; p = 0.262). The intra-cage osseointegration scores showed a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.007), with the non-window cage group having a higher proportion of cases with a score of 4 compared with the window cage group. The TBR sign was observed in 87.9% of patients who achieved interbody fusion, with a higher rate in the non-window cage group across the entire cohort although the difference was not significant (89.7% versus 78.1%, p = 0.385).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-window-type 3D-Ti cages showed equivalent clinical outcomes compared with window-type cages and comparable interbody fusion rates. These results suggest that the potential advantages of 3D-Ti cages could be optimized in the absence of a void for bone graft by providing a larger contact surface for osseointegration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Trabecular Bone Remodeling After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Three-Dimensional Porous Tantalum and Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone Interbody Cages

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The criteria for determining completion of intervertebral stability after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) remain controversial. Several new radiological indicators of bone growth and osteointegration have been established. We compared computed tomography (CT) findings related to osteointegration after PLIF with interbody cages of two different materials and designs.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 103 patients who underwent PLIF with three-dimensional porous tantalum (Tn) cages or titanium-coated polyetheretherketone (TiP) cages. CT images obtained 3 months and 1 year after surgery were examined for trabecular bone remodeling (TBR), cancellous condensation (CC), and vertebral endplate cyst (VEC) formation. The incidences of each finding were compared by cage type, and rates of instrument failure and pseudarthrosis were determined.

RESULTS

Three months postoperatively, 87% of the levels with Tn cages exhibited TBR, whereas 96% of those with TiP cages did not (P < .001). Most levels with Tn cages levels exhibited TBR and no CC 3 months (81%) and 1 year (94%) after surgery. Although 78% of levels with TiP cages exhibited CC and no TBR 3 months after surgery, 59% exhibited both CC and TBR 1 year after surgery. Significantly fewer VECs formed around the Tn cages than around the TiP cages both 3 months (P = .002) and 1 year (P < .001) after surgery. Implant-related problems occurred at levels that exhibited neither TBR nor CC.

CONCLUSIONS

The porous tantalum cage may enable intervertebral stability that is comparable to bony fusion soon after surgery.

Trabecular Bone Remodeling as a New Indicator of Osteointegration After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

We newly found that trabecular bone remodeling (TBR) often appeared in the fixed adjacent vertebrae during bony fusion. Thus, TBR might indicate osteointegration. Hence, we aimed to investigate whether TBR in the early postoperative period could predict future bony fusion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 78 patients who underwent one-level PLIF. Demographic data were reviewed. Using computed tomography (CT) images taken at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively, we investigated the vertebral endplate cyst (VEC) formation, TBR in the vertebral body, cage subsidence, and clear zone around pedicle screw (CZPS).

RESULTS

TBR had high interobserver reliability regardless of cage materials. VECs, TBR, and both were found in 30, 53, and 16 patients at 3 months postoperatively and in 30, 65, and 22 patients at 1 year postoperatively, respectively. The incidence of VEC, which indicates poor fixation, was lower in early (3 months postoperatively) TBR-positive patients, with a significant difference at 1 year postoperatively (3 months, P = .074; 1 year, P = .003). Furthermore, 3 (5.7%) of the 53 early TBR-positive patients had CZPS without instability at 1 year postoperatively. In 25 TBR-negative patients, 1 (4.0%) had pedicle screw cutout requiring reoperation, 1 (4.0%) had pseudarthrosis, and 4 (16%) had CZPS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early TBR (3 months) did not experience pedicle screw cutout nor pseudarthrosis and had significantly fewer VECs than those without early TBR. Thus, TBR may be a new radiological marker of initial fixation after PLIF.

Current surface modification strategies to improve the binding efficiency of emerging biomaterial polyetheretherketone (PEEK) with bone and soft tissue: A literature review

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review the literature on current surface modification strategies used to improve the binding efficiency of an emerging biological material, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), with bone and soft tissues.

STUDY SELECTION

This review was based on articles retrieved from PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases. The main keywords used during the search were "polyetheretherketone (PEEK)," "implant," "surface modification," "biomaterials," "bone," "osseointegration," and "soft tissue."

RESULTS

The suitability of PEEK surface modification strategies has been critically analyzed and summarized here. Many cell and in vivo experiments in small animals have shown that the use of advanced modification technologies with appropriate surface modification strategies can effectively improve the surface inertness of PEEK, thereby improving its binding efficiency with bone and soft tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

Surface modifications of PEEK have revealed new possibilities for implant treatment; however, most results are based on in vitro or short-term in vivo evaluations in small animals. To achieve a broad application of PEEK in the field of oral implantology, more in vivo experiments and long-term clinical evaluations are needed to investigate the effects of various surface modifications on the tissue integration ability of PEEK to develop an ideal implant material.

Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery

Background

The variance in clinical responses to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with titanium (Ti) and hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings (PEEK-Ti-HA cages) is still not clear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing TLIF using PEEK-Ti-HA cages with a particular focus on fusion rate.

Methods

A prospective and nonrandomized study was conducted to compare the outcomes of PEEK-Ti-HA cages (group A, n = 32) and uncoated PEEK cages (group B, n = 32). The follow up time was at least 2 years. The radiographic assessments included the regional lordosis (RL), disc height (DH), and fusion rate. The clinical indexes included the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores (back and leg).

Results

No significant differences were found in the pre- and postoperative RL and DH between Group A and Group B. And RL and DH, even if there were any variance initially, were restored not long after surgery in both groups. Though Group A had a significantly higher fusion rate than group B at 3 months post-surgery (93.7% vs. 75.0%), the fusion rates for the two groups reached the same level (100%) when it comes to the final follow-up. Additionally, differences of VAS and JOA scores for the two groups in general approximate.

Conclusions

PEEK-Ti-HA cages, in contrast with uncoated PEEK cages, produced a better fusion rate at 3 months after single-level TLIF. The fusion rates of both groups could get 100% at the final follow-up. PEEK-Ti-HA cages could achieve similar RL, DH, JOA scores and VAS scores in comparison with uncoated PEEK cages post-surgery.

Can Polyether Ether Ketone Dethrone Titanium as the Choice Implant Material for Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery?

Instrumentation during metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS) provides stability to the spinal column in patients with pathologic fracture or iatrogenic instability produced while undergoing extensive decompression. Titanium is the current implant material of choice in MSTS. However, it hinders radiotherapy planning and generates artifacts, with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans used for postoperative evaluation of tumor recurrence and/or complications. The high modulus of elasticity of titanium (110 GPa) results in stress shielding, which may lead to construct failure at the bone-implant interface. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK), a thermoplastic polymer, is an emerging alternative to titanium for use in MSTS. The modulus of elasticity of PEEK (3.6 GPa) is close to that of cortical bone (17-21 GPa), resulting in minimal stress shielding. Its radiolucent and nonmetallic properties cause minimal interference with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans. PEEK also causes low-dose perturbation for radiotherapy planning. However, PEEK has reduced bioactivity with bone and lacks sufficient rigidity to be used as rods in MSTS. The reduced bioactivity of PEEK may be addressed by 1) surface modification (introducing porosity or bioactive coating with hydroxyapatite [HA] or titanium) and 2) forming composites with HA/titanium. The mechanical properties of PEEK may be improved by forming composites with HA or carbon fiber. Despite these modifications, all PEEK and PEEK-based implants are difficult to handle and contour intraoperatively. Our review provides a comprehensive overview of PEEK and modified PEEK implants, with a description of their properties and limitations, potentially serving as a basis for their future development and use in MSTS.

Impact of mechanical stability on the progress of bone ongrowth on the frame surfaces of a titanium-coated PEEK cage and a 3D porous titanium alloy cage: in vivo analysis using CT color mapping

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of mechanical stability on the progress of bone ongrowth on the frame surfaces of a titanium-coated polyether ether ketone (TCP) cage and a three-dimensional porous titanium alloy (PTA) cage following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) until 1 year postoperatively.

METHODS

A total of 59 patients who underwent one- or two-level PLIF for degenerative lumbar disorders since March 2015 were enrolled. Bone ongrowth of all cage frame surfaces (four surfaces per cage: TCP, 288 surfaces and PTA, 284 surfaces) was graded by 6-month and 1-year postoperative computed tomography color mapping (grade 0, 0‒25% of bone ongrowth; grade 1, 26‒50%; grade 2, 51‒75%; and grade 3, 76‒100%).

RESULTS

Bone ongrowth (≥ grade 1) was observed on 58.0% and 69.0% of the surfaces of TCP and PTA cages 6 months postoperatively and on 63.5% and 75.0% of those 1 year postoperatively, respectively. In the TCP cages, bone ongrowth grade increased from 6 months to 1 year postoperatively only in the union segments (median, 1 [interquartile range, IQR, 0-2] to 1 [IQR, 0-3], p = 0.006). By contrast, in the PTA cages, it increased at 6 months postoperatively in the union (1 [IQR, 1-2] to 2 [IQR, 1-3], p = 0.003) and non-union (0.5 [IQR, 0-2] to 1 [IQR, 0-2.75], p = 0.002) segments.

CONCLUSION

Early postoperative mechanical stability has a positive impact on the progress of bone ongrowth on both the TCP and PTA cage frame surfaces after PLIF.

Polyetheretherketone and Its Composites for Bone Replacement and Regeneration

In this article, recent advances in the development, preparation, biocompatibility and mechanical properties of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and its composites for hard and soft tissue engineering are reviewed. PEEK has been widely employed for fabricating spinal fusions due to its radiolucency, chemical stability and superior sterilization resistance at high temperatures. PEEK can also be tailored into patient-specific implants for treating orbital and craniofacial defects in combination with additive manufacturing process. However, PEEK is bioinert, lacking osseointegration after implantation. Accordingly, several approaches including surface roughening, thin film coating technology, and addition of bioactive hydroxyapatite (HA) micro-/nanofillers have been adopted to improve osseointegration performance. The elastic modulus of PEEK is 3.7-4.0 GPa, being considerably lower than that of human cortical bone ranging from 7-30 GPa. Thus, PEEK is not stiff enough to sustain applied stress in load-bearing orthopedic implants. Therefore, HA micro-/nanofillers, continuous and discontinuous carbon fibers are incorporated into PEEK for enhancing its stiffness for load-bearing applications. Among these, carbon fibers are more effective than HA micro-/nanofillers in providing additional stiffness and load-bearing capabilities. In particular, the tensile properties of PEEK composite with 30wt% short carbon fibers resemble those of cortical bone. Hydrophobic PEEK shows no degradation behavior, thus hampering its use for making porous bone scaffolds. PEEK can be blended with hydrophilic polymers such as polyglycolic acid and polyvinyl alcohol to produce biodegradable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications.

Optimizing the Spinal Interbody Implant: Current Advances in Material Modification and Surface Treatment Technologies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Interbody implants allow for fusion of the anterior column of the spine between vertebral body endplates. As rates of spinal fusion surgery have increased over the past several years, significant research has been devoted to optimizing both the mechanical and biologic properties of the interbody implant in order to promote bony fusion. The first interbody implants used decades ago were fashioned from cortical autograft. Currently, titanium alloy and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are the most widely used and studied materials for this purpose. This review focuses on recent innovations in material modification and surface treatment techniques for both titanium and PEEK implants to maximize fusion rates in spinal surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Titanium has an elastic modulus much higher than native bone and however has better osseointegrative properties than PEEK. PEEK, however, has an elastic modulus closer to that of bone without any of the advantageous biologic properties that titanium has. Increasing porosity and surface roughness of titanium implants have been shown to improve the mechanical properties of titanium implants, while the biologic properties of PEEK have been enhanced using surface coating technology, either with titanium or with hydroxyapatite (HA). Techniques such as increasing porosity, surface roughening, and surface coating are just some of the recent innovations aimed at optimizing both mechanical and biologic properties of interbody implants to promote spinal fusion. The future of interbody implant design will rely on continued improvements of PEEK and titanium implants as well as exploring new implant materials altogether.

The Titanium-coated PEEK Cage Maintains Better Bone Fusion With the Endplate Than the PEEK Cage 6 Months After PLIF Surgery: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate interbody bone fusion rates in titanium-coated polyetheretherketone (TiPEEK) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous clinical studies have not revealed any significant difference in bone fusion rates between TiPEEK and PEEK cages.

METHODS

During one-level PLIF surgery, 149 patients (84 men, 65 women, mean age 67 yr) were randomly allocated to use either a TiPEEK cage (n = 69) or PEEK cage (n = 80). Blinded radiographic evaluations were performed using computed tomography and assessed by modified intention-to-treat analysis in 149 cases and per-protocol analysis in 143 cases who were followed for 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index.

RESULTS

The interbody union rate at 12 months after surgery was 45% owing to a very strict definition of bone fusion. The rates of bone fusion were significantly higher at 4 and 6 months after surgery in the TiPEEK group than in the PEEK group in the unadjusted modified intention-to-treat analysis and were significantly higher at 6 months in the unadjusted per-protocol analysis. Binary logistic regression analysis adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, bone mineral density, and surgical level showed that using a TiPEEK cage (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-4.74; P = 0.03) was independently associated with bone fusion at 6 months after surgery. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index results improved postoperatively in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Using the TiPEEK cage for PLIF enabled the maintenance of better bone fusion to the endplate than using the PEEK cage at 6 months after the surgery. Our findings suggest the possibility of an earlier return to rigorous work or sports by the use of TiPEEK cage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

Comparison in the same intervertebral space between titanium-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in lumbar interbody fusion surgery

BACKGROUNDS

Disadvantages of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages are their smooth and hydrophobic surfaces and their lack of osteoconductivity. Titanium (Ti) coated PEEK cage has been innovated to overcome these potential concerns. However, few well-designed studies have investigated the efficacy of Ti-coated PEEK cage on interbody fusion in humans. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Ti coating on bone ongrowth at bone-implant surface by simultaneously comparing Ti-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in the same intervertebral space.

METHODS

This study is a prospective comparative study for the two different cages. Twenty-six subjects who underwent one-level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) were included. Two PEEK cages [a plasma-sprayed Ti-coated (PTC-PEEK) and an uncoated PEEK cage] were inserted in the same intervertebral space. Fusion rates, cage subsidence, and vertebral cancellous condensation (VCC) around the cage, which indicates bone growth on the surface of each cage, were assessed by thin-slice computed tomography (CT) immediately (within 1 week) and at 3 months postoperatively. A functional radiograph was obtained at 3 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-three subjects showed solid fusion at 3 months postoperatively (fusion rate, 88%). Cage subsidence was not observed. VCC was often observed around the PTC-PEEK cage as evaluated by completely synchronized CT images between immediately and at 3 months postoperatively. Quantified VCC around the cage was significantly larger in the PTC-PEEK cage than in the uncoated PEEK cage (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The Ti-coated PEEK cage exhibits radiographic signs, suggesting bone ongrowth, as represented by VCC around the cage compared with that around the uncoated PEEK cage. The Ti-coated PEEK cage has the potential to promote solid fusion and to improve clinical outcomes in lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

Surface Technologies in Spinal Fusion

Patients with symptomatic instability of the spine may be treated surgically with interbody fusion. Cost and complexity in this procedure arises owing to the implanted materials involved with facilitating fusion such as titanium or polyetheretherketone. Surface modifications have been developed to augment these base materials such as plasma-spraying polyetheretherketone with titanium or coating implants with hydroxyapatite. Although some evidence has been gathered on these novel materials, additional study is needed to establish the true efficacy of surface modifications for interbody fusion devices in improving long-term patient outcomes.