Admissions to intensive cardiac care units in France in 2014: A cross-sectional, nationwide population-based study

Phenotypic clustering of patients hospitalized in intensive cardiac care units: Insights from the ADDICT-ICCU study

BACKGROUND

Intensive cardiac care units (ICCUs) were created to manage ventricular arrhythmias after acute coronary syndromes, but have diversified to include a more heterogeneous population, the characteristics of which are not well depicted by conventional methods.

AIMS

To identify ICCU patient subgroups by phenotypic unsupervised clustering integrating clinical, biological, and echocardiographic data to reveal pathophysiological differences.

METHODS

During 7-22 April 2021, we recruited all consecutive patients admitted to ICCUs in 39 centers. The primary outcome was in-hospital major adverse events (MAEs; death, resuscitated cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock). A cluster analysis was performed using a Kamila algorithm.

RESULTS

Of 1499 patients admitted to the ICCU (69.6% male, mean age 63.3±14.9 years), 67 (4.5%) experienced MAEs. Four phenogroups were identified: PG1 (n=535), typically patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PG2 (n=444), younger smokers with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PG3 (n=273), elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and conduction disturbances; PG4 (n=247), patients with acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Compared to PG1, multivariable analysis revealed a higher risk of MAEs in PG2 (odds ratio [OR] 3.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-10.0) and PG3 (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.02-10.8), with the highest risk in PG4 (OR 20.5, 95% CI 8.7-60.8) (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Cluster analysis of clinical, biological, and echocardiographic variables identified four phenogroups of patients admitted to the ICCU that were associated with distinct prognostic profiles.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05063097.

Profile of patients hospitalized in intensive cardiac care units in France: ADDICT-ICCU registry

BACKGROUND

Intensive cardiac care units (ICCU) were initially developed to monitor ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction. In recent decades, ICCU have diversified their activities.

AIM

To determine the type of patients hospitalized in ICCU in France.

METHODS

We analysed the characteristics of patients enrolled in the ADDICT-ICCU registry (NCT05063097), a prospective study of consecutive patients admitted to ICCU in 39 centres throughout France from 7th-22nd April 2021. In-hospital major adverse events (MAE) (death, resuscitated cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock) were recorded.

RESULTS

Among 1499 patients (median age 65 [interquartile range 54-74] years, 69.6% male, 21.7% diabetes mellitus, 64.7% current or previous smokers), 34.9% had a history of coronary artery disease, 11.7% atrial fibrillation and 5.2% cardiomyopathy. The most frequent reason for admission to ICCU was acute coronary syndromes (ACS; 51.5%), acute heart failure (AHF; 14.1%) and unexplained chest pain (6.8%). An invasive procedure was performed in 36.2%. "Advanced" ICCU therapies were required for 19.9% of patients (intravenous diuretics 18.4%, non-invasive ventilation 6.1%, inotropic drugs 2.3%). No invasive procedures or advanced therapies were required in 44.1%. Cardiac computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was carried out in 12.3% of patients. The median length of ICCU hospitalization was 2.0 (interquartile range 1.0-4.0) days. The mean rate of MAE was 4.5%, and was highest in patients with AHF (10.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

ACS remains the main cause of admissions to ICCU, with most having a low rate of in-hospital MAE. Most patients experience a brief stay in ICCU before being discharged home. AHF is associated with highest death rate and with higher resource consumption.

Carbon monoxide and prognosis in smokers hospitalised with acute cardiac events: a multicentre, prospective cohort study

Background

Smoking cigarettes produces carbon monoxide (CO), which can reduce the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood. We aimed to determine whether elevated expiratory CO levels would be associated with a worse prognosis in smokers presenting with acute cardiac events.

Methods

From 7 to 22 April 2021, expiratory CO levels were measured in a prospective registry including all consecutive patients admitted for acute cardiac event in 39 centres throughout France. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause death. Initial in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MAE; death, resuscitated cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock) were also analysed. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05063097).

Findings

Among 1379 patients (63 ± 15 years, 70% men), 368 (27%) were active smokers. Expiratory CO levels were significantly raised in active smokers compared to non-smokers. A CO level >11 parts per million (ppm) found in 94 (25.5%) smokers was associated with a significant increase in death (14.9% for CO > 11 ppm vs. 2.9% for CO ≤ 11 ppm; p < 0.001). Similar results were found after adjustment for comorbidities (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]): 5.92 [2.43-14.38]) or parameters of in-hospital severity (HR 6.09, 95% CI [2.51-14.80]) and propensity score matching (HR 7.46, 95% CI [1.70-32.8]). CO > 11 ppm was associated with a significant increase in MAE in smokers during initial hospitalisation after adjustment for comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] 15.75, 95% CI [5.56-44.60]) or parameters of in-hospital severity (OR 10.67, 95% CI [4.06-28.04]). In the overall population, CO > 11 ppm but not smoking was associated with an increased rate of all-cause death (HR 4.03, 95% CI [2.33-6.98] and 1.66 [0.96-2.85] respectively).

Interpretation

Elevated CO level is independently associated with a 6-fold increase in 1-year death and 10-fold in-hospital MAE in smokers hospitalized for acute cardiac events.

Funding

Grant from Fondation Coeur & Recherche.

Analysis of the Association Between the Number of Intensivists and the Use of Cardiovascular Agonists: An Ecological Study Using Data From National Databases of Japan

Background Previous studies have demonstrated a correlation between management by intensivists and a decrease in hospital stay and mortality, yet the underlying reason remains unknown. Using open data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB) and other databses, the present study aimed to explore the relationship between inotrope and vasoconstrictor use and the number of intensivists. Materials and methods Cardiovascular agonists listed in the 2020 NDB for which the total dose was known were included for analysis. Trends in cardiovascular agonist use over six years were then graphically assessed, and a linear regression model with the use of each target drug per prefecture as the objective variable in the 2020 data was created to analyze the impact of intensivists on drug use. Results A total of 61 drugs were classified into eight groups based on their composition, and drug use in each of the 47 prefectures was tabulated. Both the rate of use and cost showed a yearly decrease for dopamine but a yearly increase for norepinephrine. Multivariable analysis indicated that the number of intensivists was only significant for dopamine, which had a coefficient of -310 (95% CI: -548 to -72, p = 0.01) but that no such trend was evident for the other drugs. Conclusions The results demonstrated that an increasing number of intensivists in each prefecture correlated with decreasing use of dopamine, possibly explaining the improved outcomes observed in closed ICUs led by intensivists. Further research is warranted to establish causality.

Prevalence and impact of recreational drug use in patients with acute cardiovascular events

OBJECTIVE

While recreational drug use is a risk factor for cardiovascular events, its exact prevalence and prognostic impact in patients admitted for these events are not established. We aimed to assess the prevalence of recreational drug use and its association with in-hospital major adverse events (MAEs) in patients admitted to intensive cardiac care units (ICCU).

METHODS

In the Addiction in Intensive Cardiac Care Units (ADDICT-ICCU) study, systematic screening for recreational drugs was performed by prospective urinary testing all patients admitted to ICCU in 39 French centres from 7 to 22 April 2021. The primary outcome was prevalence of recreational drug detection. In-hospital MAEs were defined by death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or haemodynamic shock.

RESULTS

Of 1499 consecutive patients (63±15 years, 70% male), 161 (11%) had a positive test for recreational drugs (cannabis 9.1%, opioids 2.1%, cocaine 1.7%, amphetamines 0.7%, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) 0.6%). Only 57% of these patients declared recreational drug use. Patients who used recreational drugs exhibited a higher MAE rate than others (13% vs 3%, respectively, p<0.001). Recreational drugs were associated with a higher rate of in-hospital MAEs after adjustment for comorbidities (OR 8.84, 95% CI 4.68 to 16.7, p<0.001). After adjustment, cannabis, cocaine, and MDMA, assessed separately, were independently associated with in-hospital MAEs. Multiple drug detection was frequent (28% of positive patients) and associated with an even higher incidence of MAEs (OR 12.7, 95% CI 4.80 to 35.6, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of recreational drug use in patients hospitalised in ICCU was 11%. Recreational drug detection was independently associated with worse in-hospital outcomes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05063097.

Organization of intensive cardiac care units in Europe: Results of a multinational survey

Background:

The present survey aims to describe the intensive cardiac care unit organization and admission policies in Europe.

Methods:

A total of 228 hospitals (61% academic) from 27 countries participated in this survey. In addition to the organizational aspects of the intensive cardiac care units, including classification of the intensive cardiac care unit levels, data on the admission diagnoses were gathered from consecutive patients who were admitted during a two-day period. Admission policies were evaluated by comparing illness severity with the intensive cardiac care unit level. Gross national income was used to differentiate high-income countries (n=13) from middle-income countries (n=14).

Results:

A total of 98% of the hospitals had an intensive cardiac care unit: 70% had a level 1 intensive cardiac care unit, 76% had a level 2 intensive cardiac care unit, 51% had a level 3 intensive cardiac care unit, and 60% of the hospitals had more than one intensive cardiac care unit level. High-income countries tended to have more level 3 intensive cardiac care units than middle-income countries (55% versus 41%, p=0.07). A total of 5159 admissions were scored on illness severity: 63% were low severity, 24% were intermediate severity, and 12% were high severity. Patients with low illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, whereas patients with high illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 2 and 3 intensive cardiac care units. A policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; some patients with high illness severity were admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more often in middle-income countries, whereas some patients with low illness severity were admitted to level 3 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more frequently in high-income countries.

Conclusion:

More than one-third of the admitted patients were considered intermediate or high risk. Although patients with higher illness severity were mostly admitted to high-level intensive cardiac care units, an admission policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; this mismatch was partly related to insufficient logistic intensive cardiac care unit capacity.

Organization of intensive cardiac care units in Europe: Results of a multinational survey

Background:

The present survey aims to describe the intensive cardiac care unit organization and admission policies in Europe.

Methods:

A total of 228 hospitals (61% academic) from 27 countries participated in this survey. In addition to the organizational aspects of the intensive cardiac care units, including classification of the intensive cardiac care unit levels, data on the admission diagnoses were gathered from consecutive patients who were admitted during a two-day period. Admission policies were evaluated by comparing illness severity with the intensive cardiac care unit level. Gross national income was used to differentiate high-income countries (n=13) from middle-income countries (n=14).

Results:

A total of 98% of the hospitals had an intensive cardiac care unit: 70% had a level 1 intensive cardiac care unit, 76% had a level 2 intensive cardiac care unit, 51% had a level 3 intensive cardiac care unit, and 60% of the hospitals had more than one intensive cardiac care unit level. High-income countries tended to have more level 3 intensive cardiac care units than middle-income countries (55% versus 41%, p=0.07). A total of 5159 admissions were scored on illness severity: 63% were low severity, 24% were intermediate severity, and 12% were high severity. Patients with low illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, whereas patients with high illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 2 and 3 intensive cardiac care units. A policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; some patients with high illness severity were admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more often in middle-income countries, whereas some patients with low illness severity were admitted to level 3 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more frequently in high-income countries.

Conclusion:

More than one-third of the admitted patients were considered intermediate or high risk. Although patients with higher illness severity were mostly admitted to high-level intensive cardiac care units, an admission policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; this mismatch was partly related to insufficient logistic intensive cardiac care unit capacity.

Mortality rate and other clinical features observed in Open vs closed format intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nowadays most of the intensive care units (ICUs) operate as a closed format in comparison to an open format. The new concept of a closed ICU is where patients are admitted under the full responsibility of a trained intensivist, whereas an open ICU is where patients are admitted under the care of another attending physician and intensivists are just available for consultation. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare mortality rate and other clinical features observed in open vs closed ICU formats.

METHODS

Biomedical and pharmacological bibliographic database Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), the Cochrane Central and www.ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for required English publications. Mortality, the frequency of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, central line, arterial line and pulmonary arterial catheter were assessed respectively. Statistical analysis was carried out by the RevMan software. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to represent the data following analysis.

RESULTS

Five studies with a total number of 6160 participants enrolled between years 1992 to 2007 were included. Results of this analysis showed that mortality rate was significantly higher in the open format ICU (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.17-1.48; P = .00001) (using a fixed effect model) and (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.09-1.59; P = .005) (using a random effect model). Closed format ICUs were associated with significantly higher number of patients that required central line (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.92; P = .02). Patients requiring mechanical ventilation (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.65-1.78; P = .77), patients requiring arterial line (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.49-2.29; P = .89) and patients requiring pulmonary arterial catheter (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.40-1.87; P = .71) were similar in the open vs the closed setting.

CONCLUSION

This analysis showed that mortality rate was significantly higher in an open as compared to a closed format ICU. However, the frequency of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, arterial line and pulmonary arterial catheter was similarly observed. Larger trials are expected to further confirm those hypotheses.