Efficacy and safety of Xiaofeng powder (xiao feng san) in treating urticaria: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The Role of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Chinese Pharmacopoeia in the Evaluation and Treatment of COVID-19

The epidemic prompted by COVID-19 continues to spread, causing a great risk to the general population's safety and health. There are still no drugs capable of curing it. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) are the two other diseases caused by coronaviruses. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) showed benefits in treating SARS and MERS by preventing the disease early, substantially mitigating symptoms, shortening the treatment period, and minimizing risks and adverse reactions caused by hormone therapy. Although several vaccines have been developed and are being used for the treatment of COVID-19, existing vaccines cannot provide complete protection against the virus due to the rapid evolution and mutation of the virus, as mutated viral epitopes evade the vaccine's target and decrease the efficacy of vaccines. Thus, there is a need to develop alternative options. TCM has demonstrated positive effects in the treatment of COVID-19. Previous research studies on TCM showed broad-spectrum antiviral activity, offering a range of possibilities for their potential use against COVID-19. This study shed some light on common TCM used for SARS and MERS outbreaks and their effective use for COVID-19 management. This study provides new insights into COVID-19 drug discovery.

Efficacy and safety of modified Xiao-Feng Powder in the treatment of chronic urticaria: protocol of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study

Background

Chronic Urticaria (CU), a common skin disorder known as Yin Zhen in Chinese medicine, is characterized by recurrent, pruritic, pink-to-red edematous lesions and wheals on the skin. Xiao-Feng Powder (XFP, meaning Wind-Dispersing Powder), is reported to be one of the most frequently used Chinese herbal formulae for CU. In this study, we aim to investigate the effectiveness and safety of modified Xiao-Feng Powder (mXFP) for the treatment of CU.

Methods

In this randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, 58 subjects identified as having mild to severe urticaria (Urticaria activity score greater than 10) will be recruited and randomised into two groups to receive antihistamine Bilastine with either mXFP or placebo for 12 weeks, followed by post treatment visits at week 16. The primary outcome measure is the change of weekly urticaria activity score (UAS7) at week 12. Secondary outcome measures include the Urticaria Control Test (UCT), Visual Analog Scale of Itch Severity (VAS), Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL), Angioedema Activity Score (AAS), immunoglobulin E (IgE) test, gut microbiota test and use of antihistamines during study period. The trial will be conducted at three Chinese medicine clinics in Hong Kong.

Expected outcomes

The results of this study will establish robust clinical evidence about the efficacy and safety of mXFP in the treatment of CU. A specific feature of this trial is that it is a integrative medicine trial with subjects being allowed to take the Western and Chinese medicine together for the treatment.

Trial registration This is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT04967092. Register date: July 19, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04967092.

Emerging treatments for chronic urticaria

INTRODUCTION

Across the globe, chronic urticaria (CU), i.e. chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CINDU), is common, long-persisting and difficult to manage. Still, at least one-fifth is not sufficiently controlled by guideline-recommended treatment with H1-antihistamines and add-on therapy with the anti-IgE monoclonal antibody omalizumab.

AREAS COVERED

Using PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Congress websites, and websites of the manufacturers, this review explored the pipeline, namely anti-IgE-, anti-cytokine-, anti-receptor biologics, and small molecules, in clinical development for CU.

EXPERT OPINION

The CU pipeline is promising. While three omalizumab biosimilars are investigated, the assumed early approval of ligelizumab will expand the effective and safe anti-IgE approach observed with omalizumab. For other anti-IgEs like UB-221, the development is behind. Data are too limited so far to clearly define the role of anti-cytokine and anti-cytokine receptor biologics such as dupilumab, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and CDX-0159, of which only dupilumab is actually investigated in phase 3. Among three selective oral BTK inhibitors, remibrutinib, rilzabrutinib, and fenebrutinib, the development of remibrutinib is most advanced (phase 3). As the pipeline addresses different targets, study results will give deeper insights into the pathomechanisms of CU. Hopefully, in the next future additional approved and also more targeted approaches will be available.