1
|
Tan F, Li N, Wu Y, Zhang C. Palliative sedation determinants: systematic review and meta-analysis in palliative medicine. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024; 13:e664-e675. [PMID: 37553203 PMCID: PMC10850834 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utilisation of palliative sedation is often favoured by patients approaching end of life due to the presence of multiple difficult-to-manage symptoms during the terminal stage. This study aimed to identify the determinants of the use of palliative sedation. METHODS To identify pertinent observational studies, a comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO databases from their inception until March 2022. The methodological quality of the chosen prospective and retrospective cohort studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale, while the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the selected cross-sectional studies. For each potential determinant of interest, the collected data were synthesised and analysed, and in cases where data could not be combined, a narrative synthesis approach was adopted. RESULTS A total of 21 studies were analysed in this research, consisting of 4 prospective cohort studies, 7 retrospective cohort studies, and 10 cross-sectional studies. The findings indicated that several determinants were significantly associated with palliative sedation. These determinants included younger age, male gender, presence of tumours, dyspnoea, pain, delirium, making advanced medical end-of-life decisions, and dying in a hospital setting. CONCLUSIONS The findings of our review could help physicians identify patients who may need palliative sedation in advance and implement targeted interventions to reverse refractory symptoms, develop personalized palliative sedation programs, and ultimately improve the quality of palliative care services. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number CRD42022324720.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Tan
- Department of Palliative Medicine, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Medicine Research Center, West China-PUMC C.C. Chen Institute of Health, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Na Li
- Department of Palliative Medicine, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Medicine Research Center, West China-PUMC C.C. Chen Institute of Health, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yan Wu
- Department of Palliative Medicine, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Medicine Research Center, West China-PUMC C.C. Chen Institute of Health, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Chuan Zhang
- Department of Palliative Medicine, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Medicine Research Center, West China-PUMC C.C. Chen Institute of Health, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hwang IC. Current Status and Future Directions of Research on Palliative Sedation. JOURNAL OF HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE 2022; 25:193-197. [PMID: 37674671 PMCID: PMC10179994 DOI: 10.14475/jhpc.2022.25.4.193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Patients with terminal cancer experience very severe symptoms during the end of life, and palliative sedation (PS) may be considered if those symptoms are refractory to any other treatment. This brief report presents ethical considerations, practices, and recent concerns on PS. PS is quite different from euthanasia. There is a lack of consensus and standards on protocols, but its notable effects have been reported in hospice care settings. Most studies to date have reported no difference in survival between patients receiving PS and those not, and PS must be conducted proportionally with the lightest level of sedation. The most common indication for PS is delirium, and midazolam is the main sedative used. It is recommended that information regarding PS should be provided to patients and their caregivers repeatedly as early as possible. Existential suffering alone is not an indication for PS, and there is a lack of evidence on bispectral analysis. Additional research on PS is needed in Korea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- In Cheol Hwang
- Department of Family Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kwon S, Kim M, Choi S. Ethical dilemmas and care actions in nurses providing palliative sedation. Nurs Ethics 2022; 29:1220-1230. [PMID: 35728273 DOI: 10.1177/09697330221105639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, palliative care is increasingly important, with an emphasis on the process of dying with dignity. However, nurses who care for such patients experience the associated ethical dilemmas. OBJECTIVE To explore the meaning of nurses' experiences in dealing with ethical dilemmas in relation to palliative sedation. RESEARCH DESIGN A qualitative research design was employed with a thematic analysis approach. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT Using purposive sampling, 15 nurses, working at palliative care units for at least 1 year, were recruited as participants. Data were collected using unstructured in-depth interviews, and data collection and analysis was performed simultaneously. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS Ethical approval was obtained from the authors' institutional review board. All participants provided informed consent. For the face-to-face interview, the South Korean standard COVID-19 quarantine guidelines, such as mandatory masking and social distancing, were followed. RESULTS Dilemmas raised by patients, were related to concerns about appropriate drug dose; dilemmas raised by nurses, were related to passive care, sense of guilt for failure to predict death, and colleague's disrespectful attitudes toward patients; dilemmas from patients' families were related to demands for palliative sedation and reversal of those demands. Care actions to deal with ethical dilemmas comprised evidence-based care, person-centered thinking, reflecting on the death situation, compassion, providing explanation and help to family members. CONCLUSION Nurses' ethical dilemmas were pre-dominantly influenced by themselves, rather than by the patients or their families, especially if they felt they could not do their best for patients. The core concept of care actions to deal with the ethical dilemmas, was person-centered care and compassion. Then, how patients and their family members perceive person-centered care and compassion, should be further explored to improve palliative sedation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinyoung Kwon
- Department of Nursing, 250458Gangdong University, Eumseong-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea
| | | | - Sujin Choi
- 35031Woosuk University, Wanju, Jeollabuk-do, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schildmann E, Meesters S, Bausewein C, Grüne B, Sophie Licher A, Bolzani A, Remi C, Nübling G, Benedikt Westphalen C, Drey M, Harbeck N, Hentrich M, Grüne B. Sedatives and Sedation at the End of Life in the Hospital. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2022; 119:373-379. [PMID: 35440363 PMCID: PMC9487710 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on sedation at the end of life (eol) in different medical disciplines are scarce and mostly based on subjective reports. We aimed to assess the use of sedatives with continuous effect in the last week of life and associated factors in different hospital departments, with the aid of objectifiable criteria. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on the medical records of patients who died in one of five clinical departments of German hospitals between January 2015 and December 2017 (hematology/oncology [two different departments], neurology, geriatrics, and gynecology). The use of sedatives that are recommended in guidelines for palliative sedation was analyzed, irrespective of indication and treatment intent, with the aid of published definitions of continuous effect and of at least moderately sedating doses. The analysis consisted of descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS 260/517 (50%) of the patients who died were given sedatives with continuous effect in the last week of life, 53/517 (10%) in at least moderately sedating doses. For 76/260 (29%) patients, no indication was noted. The term "sedation" was used in the medical records of 20/260 (8%) patients. The use of sedatives with continuous effect was significantly associated with the department in which the patient was treated (hematology/oncology II: OR 0.32, 95% CI [0.16: 0.63]; geriatrics: OR 0.23, 95% CI [0.10:0.50]; reference, hematology/oncology I). CONCLUSION It was not possible to draw a clear distinction between the use of sedatives for symptom control, without sedating effect or intent to sedate, and intentional sedation to relieve suffering. The observed differences between hospital departments and deviations from recommended practice, e.g. lack of documentation of the indication, warrant further exploration. Moreover, context-specific supportive measures for the use of sedatives and sedation at the end of life should be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Schildmann
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich,Oncological Palliative Care, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology & Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin,*Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie Onkologische Palliativmedizin Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sophie Meesters
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich
| | | | - Bettina Grüne
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich
| | | | - Anna Bolzani
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich
| | - Constanze Remi
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich
| | - Georg Nübling
- Department of Neurologiy, University Hospital, LMU Munich
| | - C. Benedikt Westphalen
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, University Hospital, LMU Munich & Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich
| | - Michael Drey
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Geriatrics, University Hospital, LMU Munich
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich & Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Red Cross Hospital, Munich
| | - Bettina Grüne
- Department of Youth and Youth Services, German Youth Institute (DJI), Munich
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heijltjes MT, Morita T, Mori M, Heckel M, Klein C, Stiel S, Miccinesi G, Deliens L, Robijn L, Stone P, Sykes N, Hui D, Krishna L, van Delden JJM, van der Heide A, Rietjens JAC. Physicians' Opinion and Practice With the Continuous Use of Sedatives in the Last Days of Life. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:78-87. [PMID: 34333097 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT There are few international studies about the continuous use of sedatives (CUS) in the last days of life. OBJECTIVES We aim to describe the experiences and opinions regarding CUS of physicians caring for terminally ill patients in seven countries. METHODS Questionnaire study about practices and experiences with CUS in the last days of life among physicians caring for terminally ill patients in Belgium (n = 175), Germany (n = 546), Italy (n = 214), Japan (n = 513), the Netherlands (n = 829), United Kingdom (n = 114) and Singapore (n = 21). RESULTS The overall response rate was 22%. Of the respondents, 88-99% reported that they had clinical experience of CUS in the last 12 months. More than 90% of respondents indicated that they mostly used midazolam for sedation. The use of sedatives to relieve suffering in the last days of life was considered acceptable in cases of physical suffering (87%-99%). This percentage was lower but still substantial in cases of psycho-existential suffering in the absence of physical symptoms (45%-88%). These percentages were lower when the prognosis was at least several weeks (22%-66% for physical suffering and 5%-42% for psycho-existential suffering). Of the respondents, 10% or less agreed with the statement that CUS is unnecessary because suffering can be alleviated with other measures. A substantial proportion (41%-95%) agreed with the statement that a competent patient with severe suffering has the right to demand the use of sedatives in the last days of life. CONCLUSION Many respondents in our study considered CUS acceptable for the relief of physical and psycho-existential suffering in the last days of life. The acceptability was lower regarding CUS for psycho-existential suffering and regarding CUS for patients with a longer life expectancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madelon T Heijltjes
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.T.H., J.J.M.V.D.), UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Tatsuya Morita
- Palliative and Supportive Care Division (T.M., M.M.), Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masanori Mori
- Palliative and Supportive Care Division (T.M., M.M.), Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Maria Heckel
- Department of Palliative Medicine (M.H., C.K.), CCC Erlangen - EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carsten Klein
- Department of Palliative Medicine (M.H., C.K.), CCC Erlangen - EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stiel
- Hannover Medical School (S.S.), Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Guido Miccinesi
- Oncological network (G.M.), Prevention and Research Institute-ISPRO, Firenze, Italy
| | - Luc Deliens
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (L.D.), Ixelles, Belgium
| | - Lenzo Robijn
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care (L.R.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Patrick Stone
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department (P.S., N.S.), University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel Sykes
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department (P.S., N.S.), University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Hui
- MD Anderson Cancer Center (D.H.), University of Texas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Johannes J M van Delden
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.T.H., J.J.M.V.D.), UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes van der Heide
- Erasmus MC (A.V.D.H., J.A.C.R.), University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith A C Rietjens
- Erasmus MC (A.V.D.H., J.A.C.R.), University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ahn HK, Ahn HY, Park SJ, Hwang IC. Characteristics Associated with Survival in Patients Receiving Continuous Deep Sedation in a Hospice Care Unit. JOURNAL OF HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE 2021; 24:254-260. [PMID: 37674644 PMCID: PMC10180067 DOI: 10.14475/jhpc.2021.24.4.254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Continuous deep sedation (CDS) is an extreme form of palliative sedation to relieve refractory symptoms at the end of life. In this study, we shared our experiences with CDS and examined the clinical characteristics associated with survival in patients with terminal cancer who received CDS. We conducted a chart audit of 106 consecutive patients with terminal cancer who received CDS at a single hospice care unit between January 2014 and December 2016. Survival was defined as the first day of admission to the date of death. The associations between clinical characteristics and survival were presented as hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals using a Cox proportional hazard model. The mean age of participants was 65.2 years, and 33.0% (n=35) were women. Diazepam was the most commonly administered drug, and haloperidol or lorazepam were also used if needed. One sedative was enough for a majority of the patients. Stepwise multivariate analysis identified poor functioning, a high Palliative Prognostic Index score, hyperbilirubinemia, high serum ferritin levels, and a low number of sedatives as independent poor prognostic factors. Our experiences and findings are expected to be helpful for shared decision-making and further research on palliative sedation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee Kyung Ahn
- Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Hong Yup Ahn
- Department of Statistics, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - In Cheol Hwang
- Department of Family Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dieudonné Rahm N, Morawska G, Pautex S, Elia N. Monitoring nociception and awareness during palliative sedation: A systematic review. Palliat Med 2021; 35:1407-1420. [PMID: 34109873 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211022943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Providing unawareness and pain relief are core elements of palliative sedation. In addition to clinical scales, nociception and electroencephalogram-based depth of sedation monitoring are used to assess the level of consciousness and analgesia during sedation in intensive care units and during procedures. AIM To determine whether reported devices impact the outcomes of palliative sedation. DESIGN Systematic review and narrative synthesis of research published between January 2000 and December 2020. DATA SOURCES Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Library. All reports describing the use of any monitoring device to assess the level of consciousness or analgesia during palliative sedation were screened for inclusion. Data concerning safety and efficacy were extracted. Patient comfort was the primary outcome of interest. Articles reporting sedation but that did not meet guidelines of the European Association for Palliative Care were excluded. RESULTS Six reports of five studies were identified. Four of these were case series and two were case reports. Together, these six reports involved a total of 67 sedated adults. Methodological quality was assessed fair to good. Medication regimens were adjusted to bispectral index monitoring values in two studies, which found poor correlation between monitoring values and observational scores. In another study, high nociception index values, representing absence of pain, were used to detect opioid overdosing. Relatives and caregivers found the procedures feasible and acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Dieudonné Rahm
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, Geneva University Hospitals, Hôpital de Bellerive, Collonge-Bellerive, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ghizlaine Morawska
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, Geneva University Hospitals, Hôpital de Bellerive, Collonge-Bellerive, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sophie Pautex
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, Geneva University Hospitals, Hôpital de Bellerive, Collonge-Bellerive, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nadia Elia
- Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nolen A, Olwi R, Debbie S. Impact of legalization of Medical Assistance in Dying on the Use of Palliative Sedation in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Retrospective Chart Review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2021; 39:442-447. [PMID: 34227433 PMCID: PMC8905116 DOI: 10.1177/10499091211030443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients approaching end of life may experience intractable symptoms managed with palliative sedation. The legalization of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) in Canada in 2016 offers a new option for relief of intolerable suffering, and there is limited evidence examining how the use of palliative sedation has evolved with the introduction of MAiD. OBJECTIVES To compare rates of palliative sedation at a tertiary care hospital before and after the legalization of MAiD. METHODS This study is a retrospective chart analysis of all deaths of patients followed by the palliative care consult team in acute care, or admitted to the palliative care unit. We compared the use of palliative sedation during 1-year periods before and after the legalization of MAiD, and screened charts for MAiD requests during the second time period. RESULTS 4.7% (n = 25) of patients who died in the palliative care unit pre-legalization of MAiD received palliative sedation compared to 14.6% (n = 82) post-MAiD, with no change in acute care. Post-MAiD, 4.1% of deaths were medically-assisted deaths in the palliative care unit (n = 23) and acute care (n = 14). For patients who requested MAiD but instead received palliative sedation, the primary reason was loss of decisional capacity to consent for MAiD. CONCLUSION We believe that the mainstream presence of MAiD has resulted in an increased recognition of MAiD and palliative sedation as distinct entities, and rates of palliative sedation increased post-MAiD due to greater awareness about patient choice and increased comfort with end-of-life options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Nolen
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rawaa Olwi
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Selby Debbie
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Heijltjes MT, van Thiel GJMW, Rietjens JAC, van der Heide A, de Graeff A, van Delden JJM. Changing Practices in the Use of Continuous Sedation at the End of Life: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 60:828-846.e3. [PMID: 32599152 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The use of continuous sedation until death (CSD) has been highly debated for many years. It is unknown how the use of CSD evolves over time. Reports suggest that there is an international increase in the use of CSD for terminally ill patients. OBJECTIVE To gain insight in developments in the use of CSD in various countries and subpopulations. METHODS We performed a search of the literature published between January 2000 and April 2020, in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library by using the Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols guidelines. The search contained the following terms: continuous sedation, terminal sedation, palliative sedation, deep sedation, end-of-life sedation, sedation practice, and sedation until death. RESULTS We found 23 articles on 16 nationwide studies and 38 articles on 37 subpopulation studies. In nationwide studies on frequencies of CSD in deceased persons varied from 3% in Denmark in 2001 to 18% in The Netherlands in 2015. Nationwide studies indicate an increase in the use of CSD. Frequencies of CSD in the different subpopulations varied too widely to observe time trends. Over the years, more studies reported on the use of CSD for nonphysical symptoms including fear, anxiety, and psycho-existential distress. In some studies, there was an increase in requests for sedation of patients from their families. CONCLUSIONS The frequency of CSD seems to increase over time, possibly partly because of an extension of indications for sedation, from mainly physical symptoms to also nonphysical symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madelon T Heijltjes
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Ghislaine J M W van Thiel
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith A C Rietjens
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes van der Heide
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander de Graeff
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands and Academic Hospice Demeter, De Bilt, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes J M van Delden
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|