Solvent-based paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel for heavily treated relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer: Retrospective single-institution observational study

Efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel or combined nab-paclitaxel and immune checkpoint inhibitors in relapsed small-cell lung cancer

Background

Most patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) experience disease progression after first-line chemotherapy. Notably, nab-paclitaxel monotherapy has antitumor activity in relapsed SCLC.

Objective

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined of nab-paclitaxel and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in relapsed SCLC.

Design

We retrospectively analyzed patients with relapsed SCLC who received nab-paclitaxel or combined nab-paclitaxel and ICIs (anti-programmed death-1, PD-1 or anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand, PD-L1) between February 2017 and September 2021.

Methods

Efficacy and safety data were collected from electronic health records. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a standard log-rank test.

Results

We included 56 patients with relapsed SCLC, of which 29 received nab-paclitaxel alone (Group A), and 27 received combined nab-paclitaxel and ICIs (Group B). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Group B had a numerically higher objective response rate than Group A (40.7% versus 17.2%; p = 0.052). However, combined nab-paclitaxel and ICIs failed to demonstrate survival superiority over nab-paclitaxel monotherapy [median PFS: 3.2 months versus 2.8 months (p = 0.5225); median OS: 11.0 months versus 9.3 months (p = 0.7298)]. The safety profiles of Groups A and B were both tolerable.

Conclusion

This study indicated that compared with nab-paclitaxel monotherapy, combined nab-paclitaxel and ICIs failed to improve survival in relapsed SCLC.

Treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in Europe: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Describe characteristics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review study defining several cohorts: (1) limited-stage disease (LD) SCLC initiating 1L therapy (1 L LD-SCLC), (2) extensive-stage disease (ED) SCLC initiating 1L therapy (1L ED-SCLC) and (3) patients initiating 2L therapy.

SETTING

39 physicians (medical oncologists, thoracic oncologists and/or pulmonologists) from France, Italy and the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients >18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of LD-SCLC or ED-SCLC and a full oncology medical history. Patients included initiated a 1L (2013-2015) or 2L (2013-2016) treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy-RT).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

231 patients in 1L LD-SCLC, 308 in 1L ED-SCLC and 225 with relapse/refractory SCLC initiating 2L treatment were included. The proportion of men was higher across all groups (56.8% to 68.5%) and mean age at time of diagnosis was 66.0 and 65.4 years in 1L LD-SCLC and 2L ED-SCLC cohorts. The majority of patients in LD-SCLC 1L group received chemotherapy with RT (76.2%). Patients initiating 2L therapy predominantly received chemotherapy alone (79.6%).Median OS in 1 L patients was 17.3 months in LD-SCLC and 8.8 months in ED-SCLC. Median PFS was 11.6 months in LD-SCLC and 6.1 months in ED-SCLC patients. Median OS in patients initiating 2L treatment was 6.6 months. OS from start of 2L treatment was lower in patients initially diagnosed with ED (5.1 months) than in patients initially diagnosed with LD (9.3 months) (p<0.0001). OS and PFS were assessed from the start of 1L or 2L therapy, depending on the cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the availability of a high number of treatments and combinations, the prognosis of SCLC is still unsatisfactory, especially for those patients diagnosed with ED-SCLC, indicating high unmet need in this patient population.

Weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel and paclitaxel for relapsed small cell lung cancer: A retrospective observational study

In addition to advanced non-small cell lung cancer, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) may also harbor potential benefit for patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC), since weekly paclitaxel (PTX) shows modest activity for relapsed SCLC. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of both weekly nab-PTX and PTX for relapsed SCLC.We retrospectively reviewed 52 consecutive relapsed SCLC patients who were treated with weekly nab-PTX or PTX at our hospital.The response rate, median progression-free survival and overall survival with nab-PTX and PTX were 5.6 vs 8.8%, 3.2 vs 1.7 months, and 5.4 vs 4.5 months, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups for ≥Grade 3 adverse events.Weekly nab-PTX and PTX showed similar activity for relapsed SCLC. The toxicity profile of nab-PTX was equally tolerable to that of PTX.

Standard therapy-resistant small cell lung cancer showing dynamic transition of neuroendocrine fate during the cancer trajectory: A case report

While small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been treated as a single disease historically, recent studies have suggested that SCLC can be classified into molecular subtypes based on the expression of lineage transcription factors such as achaete-scute homolog 1 (ASCL1), neurogenic differentiation factor 1 (NEUROD1), POU domain class 2 transcription factor 3 (POU2F3) and transcriptional coactivator YAP1 (YAP1). These transcription factor-based subtypes may be specifically targeted in therapy, and recent studies have suggested that the SCLC subtypes represent different stages of dynamic evolution of SCLC rather than independent diseases. Nevertheless, evidence of shift in neuroendocrine differentiation during SCLC evolution has been lacking in the clinical setting. In the present study, a 60-year-old male was diagnosed with extensive SCLC. The tumor responded not to the standard SCLC regimen of carboplatin, etoposide and atezolizumab, but to the non-SCLC regimen of carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel and pembrolizumab. The patient succumbed 5 months after the initial diagnosis and a pathological autopsy was performed. The tumor was originally negative for all four transcription factors, ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3 and YAP1, in the biopsy specimens at diagnosis. Loss of synaptophysin expression and emergence of Myc proto-oncogene protein and YAP1 expression was recorded in the autopsy specimens, suggesting the transition to a decreased neuroendocrine fate during the disease trajectory. This case provides clinical evidence of dynamic transition of neuroendocrine fate during SCLC evolution. In light of SCLC heterogeneity and plasticity, development of precision medicine is required.

Evaluation of topotecan monotherapy for relapsed small-cell lung cancer after amrubicin monotherapy failure

Objective: The utility of topotecan monotherapy for relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) after failure of amrubicin monotherapy has not been evaluated. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of topotecan monotherapy in patients with relapsed SCLC after amrubicin monotherapy.

Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 16 patients with relapsed SCLC who were treated with topotecan monotherapy after amrubicin monotherapy at our hospital.

Results: The response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 0%, 32.5 days (95% confidence interval [CI] = 18–51), and 112 days (95% CI = 55–267), respectively. The most common adverse events (grade ≥3) were leukopenia (31.3%) and thrombocytopenia (31.3%), followed by anemia, anorexia, edema, and lung infections.

Conclusion: The efficacy of topotecan monotherapy for relapsed SCLC after amrubicin monotherapy is inconclusive. Therefore, further studies are warranted.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in small-cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review

Background

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 12-15% of lung cancers and is associated with poor survival outcomes and high symptom burden. This study employed a broad, systematic search strategy and timeframe to identify evidence on real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for SCLC outside the USA, including understanding sub-populations such as extensive-stage (ES) or limited-stage (LS) disease.

Methods

Databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and EBM reviews) were searched for journal articles published in the English language between 1 January 2000-1 March 2020 and supplemented by hand searching of conference abstracts and posters presented at conferences between 1 January 2016-1 March 2020 reporting real-world treatment outcomes in patients with SCLC. A targeted clinical guideline review was also completed.

Results

One-hundred studies provided quantitative data; 57 were available as full-text articles, whilst the remaining 43 were presented as abstracts or posters. The majority (80 studies, 80%) of included studies reported treatment in the first-line setting, where platinum-based chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy was the most commonly used treatment strategy, in line with current treatment guidelines in SCLC. First-line treatments were found to have a high response rate; however, most patients relapsed early. No studies reported treatment or outcomes with immune-oncology therapies. Second-line treatment options were very limited, and primarily consisted of either re-treatment with first-line regimen or topotecan, but the prognosis for these patients remained poor. Outcomes were particularly poor amongst those with ES or relapsed disease vs. LS disease.

Conclusions

SCLC treatment patterns and short survival outcomes have remained constant over the previous 20 years. Due to the search timeframe, none of the studies identified reported on the impact of recently approved immune-oncology therapies in SCLC. Further data is needed on the impact of immunotherapies on treatment patterns and real-world outcomes in SCLC.

Phase 2 study of NAB-paclitaxel in SensiTivE and refractory relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (NABSTER TRIAL)

BACKGROUND

Despite sensitivity to first-line chemotherapy, most small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients relapse. In this setting, topotecan demonstrated modest activity with significant toxicity. Paclitaxel was also active. This study was designed to evaluate activity and safety of nab-paclitaxel in relapsed SCLC.

METHODS

In this multicentre prospective Phase 2 trial, patients with refractory or sensitive SCLC progressed to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/smq on days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks up to six cycles, progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective tumour response. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of the 68 patients treated, partial response was 8% in the refractory cohort and 14% in the sensitive cohort. Most common toxicities of any grade were fatigue (54%), anaemia (38%), neutropenia (29%), leukopenia (26%) and diarrhoea (21%). Median PFS was similar in both refractory (1.8 months) and sensitive cohorts (1.9 months), while median OS was longer in sensitive one (6.6 versus 3.6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Although nab-paclitaxel has shown some modest anti-tumour activity in relapsed SCLC, associated with a favourable toxicity profile, the primary end-point of the study was not met.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial registration number is ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03219762.

Retrospective analysis of the effectiveness and tolerability of nab-paclitaxel in Chinese elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Previous trials have suggested that elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could benefit from nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel). Real-world data on the elderly Chinese population are lacking. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and tolerability of nab-paclitaxel in Chinese elderly patients (≥65 years) with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

This study included 76 patients with a primary diagnosis of IIIB-IV NSCLC from January 2010 to December 2017 at Peking University Cancer Hospital, who received nab-paclitaxel (125 or 130 mg/m² i.v.) every three weeks. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 12 patients who received nab-paclitaxel as the first-line treatment (seven also received carboplatin), and 64 received nab-paclitaxel as the latter-line treatment. The overall ORR, DCR, median PFS, and median OS were 14.5%, 69.7%, 5.2 months, and 12.2 months, respectively. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of one and the age of 70-74 years were independently associated with longer OS, while early treatment line of nab-paclitaxel and age of 70-74 years were independently associated with longer PFS. The most common AEs were anemia, leukopenia, gastrointestinal reaction, fatigue, and peripheral neuropathy, which were all manageable. Dose adjustment or treatment discontinuation was encountered in 10 patients because of AEs. The incidence of AEs was not different among age subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Nab-paclitaxel has a good clinical response profile in Chinese elderly patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC. Prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.

KEY POINTS

Significant findings of the study Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) has a good clinical response profile in Chinese elderly (≥65 years) patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with acceptable and manageable adverse events. What this study adds Preliminary evidence shows a good clinical response from treatment with nab-paclitaxel in Chinese elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.