Can endoscopists differentiate cytomegalovirus esophagitis from herpes simplex virus esophagitis based on gross endoscopic findings?

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Esophageal Dysfunction Due to Disordered Immunity and Infection: Expert Review

METHODS

This expert review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPUC and external peer review through standard procedures of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. These Best Practice Advice (BPA) statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Since systematic reviews were not performed, these BPA statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations.

DESCRIPTION

Infectious and immune-mediated esophageal disorders are poorly understood and often under-diagnosed conditions that lead to esophageal dysfunction and health care costs due to repeated procedures and a lack of understanding of their etiology and pathogenesis. Without a high index of suspicion, these disorders may be overlooked. Esophageal dysfunction may arise from active, localized infection and immune-mediated disease (ie, candida, etc.) or from an organ-specific manifestation of a more diffuse immune-mediated disease or infection (ie, systemic sclerosis, connective tissue disease, neurologic disease). These conditions can sometimes lead to neuromuscular dysfunction and subsequent esophageal dysmotility. Awareness of local and systemic processes that lead to esophageal dysfunction will improve patient outcomes by focusing therapeutics and limiting unnecessary procedures. Therefore, the purpose of this AGA Clinical Practice Update Expert Review is to provide BPA on diagnostic considerations of immune-mediated disorders that should be considered when encountering patients with dysphagia, heartburn, and odynophagia. Best Practice Advice Statements: BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Gastroenterologists should be aware of the esophageal manifestations of systemic immunologic and infectious diseases to reduce diagnostic delay. Clinicians should identify if there are risks for inflammatory or infectious possibilities for a patient's esophageal symptoms and investigate for these disorders as a potential cause of esophageal dysfunction. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Once esophageal infection is identified, clinicians should identify whether accompanying signs/symptoms suggest immunocompromise leading to a more systemic infection. Consultation with an infectious disease expert will aid in guiding appropriate treatment. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: If symptoms do not improve after therapy for infectious esophagitis, evaluation for refractory infection or additional underlying sources of esophageal and immunologic dysfunction should be performed. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: In individuals with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) who continue to experience symptoms of esophageal dysfunction despite histologic and endoscopic disease remission, clinicians should be aware that some patients with EoE may develop motility disorders. Further evaluation of esophageal motility may be warranted. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: In individuals with histologic and endoscopic features of lymphocytic esophagitis, clinicians should consider treatment of lymphocytic-related inflammation with proton-pump inhibitor therapy or swallowed topical corticosteroids and as needed esophageal dilation. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: In patients who present with esophageal symptoms in the setting of hypereosinophilia (absolute eosinophil count [AEC] >1500 cells/uL), consider further work-up of non-EoE eosinophilic gastrointestinal (GI) disease, hypereosinophilic syndrome, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Consultation with allergy/immunology may help guide further diagnostic work-up and treatment. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: In individuals with rheumatologic diseases of systemic sclerosis (SSc), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), or Sjogren's disease, clinicians should be aware that esophageal symptoms can occur due to involvement of the esophageal muscle layer, resulting in dysmotility and/or incompetence of the lower esophageal sphincter. The degree of dysfunction is often especially significant in those with SSc or MCTD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: In individuals with Crohn's disease, clinicians should be aware that a minority of individuals can develop esophageal involvement from inflammatory, stricturing, or fistulizing changes with granulomas seen histologically. Esophageal manifestations of Crohn's disease tend to occur in individuals with active intestinal disease. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: In individuals with dermatologic diseases of lichen planus or bullous disorders, clinicians should be aware that dysphagia can occur due to endoscopically visible esophageal mucosal involvement. Esophageal lichen planus, in particular, can occur without skin involvement and can be difficult to define on esophageal histopathology. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Clinicians should consider infectious and inflammatory causes of secondary achalasia during initial evaluation. One should query for any history of recent COVID infections, risks for Chagas disease, and symptoms or signs of eosinophilic disease.

Coinfection of cytomegalovirus and strongyloidiasis presenting as massive gastrointestinal bleeding in an immunocompromised host: a case report

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an opportunistic disease in immunocompromised patients that may appear without symptoms, with constitutional symptoms, or as a tissue-invasive disease. Strongyloides stercoralis infection often manifests with non-specific symptoms; however, it can lead to severe malabsorption and extraintestinal dissemination by accelerated autoinfection. The coinfection of CMV and Strongyloides stercoralis has rarely been reported, particularly with solely severe gastrointestinal bleeding. A 29-year-old female patient with a history of nephrotic syndrome treated with long-term corticosteroid and poorly controlled type 2 diabetes presented with a 20-day history of persistent epigastric pain, diarrhea, and significant weight loss. At the hospitalization, the patient appeared to have persistent gastrointestinal bleeding, leading to hypovolemic shock and diabetic ketoacidosis. Strongyloides stercoralis was detected by the duodenal biopsy results, and the polymerase chain reaction of these samples was positive for CMV. The patient underwent upper endoscopy four times to control the bleeding and was treated with ivermectin and ganciclovir. The patient improved gradually and was discharged after 23 days of hospitalization. The coinfection of CMV and Strongyloides stercoralis causing massive gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding has been rarely reported. To the best of our knowledge, this is also the first case of coinfection of these pathogens in an immunocompromised patient complicated with hypovolemic shock caused by GI bleeding and diabetic ketoacidosis. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion and test simultaneously CMV and Strongyloides stercoralis in patients with immunosuppression, other risk factors, or unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms.

Risk Factors, Clinical and Endoscopic Features, and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cytomegalovirus Esophagitis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) esophagitis is the second most common CMV disease of the gastrointestinal tract. This study aims to comprehensively analyze risk factors, clinical characteristics, endoscopic features, outcomes, and prognostic factors of CMV esophagitis. We retrospectively collected data of patients who underwent esophageal CMV immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining between January 2003 and April 2021 from the pathology database at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Patients were divided into the CMV and non-CMV groups according to the IHC staining results. We enrolled 148 patients (44 CMV and 104 non-CMV patients). The risk factors for CMV esophagitis were male sex, immunocompromised status, and critical illness. The major clinical presentations of CMV esophagitis included epigastric pain (40.9%), fever (36.4%), odynophagia (31.8%), dysphagia (29.5%), and gastrointestinal bleeding (29.5%). Multiple diffuse variable esophageal ulcers were the most common endoscopic feature. The CMV group had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate (18.2% vs. 0%; p < 0.001), higher overall mortality rate (52.3% vs. 14.4%; p < 0.001), and longer admission duration (median, 24 days (interquartile range (IQR), 11−47 days) vs. 14 days (IQR, 7−24 days); p = 0.015) than the non-CMV group. Acute kidney injury (odds ratio (OR), 174.15; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.27−23,836.21; p = 0.040) and intensive care unit admission (OR, 26.53; 95% CI 1.06−665.08; p = 0.046) were predictors of in-hospital mortality. In conclusion, the mortality rate of patients with CMV esophagitis was high. Physicians should be aware of the clinical and endoscopic characteristics of CMV esophagitis in high-risk patients for early diagnosis and treatment.

HSV Esophagitis in an Immunocompetent 17-Year-Old

Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) esophagitis is a relatively rare form of infectious esophagitis. Typically, patients with viral esophagitis are immunocompromised. HSV esophagitis in an immunocompetent patient is uncommonly reported. The objective of this case report is to discuss symptoms, investigations, imaging, and treatment of HSV esophagitis in a healthy adolescent male. A previously healthy 17-year-old male presented to the ED of our facility with a 5-day history of fever, odynophagia, lethargy, and 2 episodes of emesis that failed to resolve with antibiotic treatment. Investigations revealed a low platelet count, mild hyponatremia, hypochloremia, and an elevated AST and ALT. A respiratory infection panel as well as CMV IgG, HIV, Rickettsia, and EBV tests were negative. HSV-1 PCR was positive and upper endoscopy revealed a friable mucosa, erythema, and exudates in the lower esophagus and erythematous duodenopathy. The patient received a diagnosis of HSV esophagitis and was treated with a 14-day course of IV to PO acyclovir. There was a rapid improvement of his symptoms with antiviral therapy.

Odynophagia in an Immunocompromised Patient

Our article presents a case of Herpes Simplex esophagitis in an immunocompromised patient who presented with severe odynophagia on a background of Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma. Our patient's clinical history and examination findings initially suggest a likely fungal etiology for esophagitis, however as the case develops the diagnosis of Herpes Simplex esophagitis becomes more evident. Our case highlights common endoscopic and histological abnormalities seen in Herpes Simplex esophagitis. Our discussion elaborates on these abnormalities and reminds readers of the treatment for HSV esophagitis.

An Unusual Presentation of Herpes Esophagitis in an Immunocompromised Individual

Herpes simplex infection remains the third most common cause of esophagitis following gastric reflux disease and candida infection. This disease usually occurs in immunocompromised individuals; however, it has been frequently reported in healthy individuals. We present a case of a 39-year-old man who presented to the ER with symptoms unusual of herpes esophagitis. He was presumed to be immunocompromised due to uncontrolled diabetes mellitus and chronic alcohol use. Endoscopy revealed features in favor of candidiasis; however, histopathology displayed characteristic features of herpes infection. Herpes esophagitis should thus be suspected in immunocompromised patients with an independent underlying pathology and treated early with antiviral agents like acyclovir to prevent impending complications.

Machine learning approach for differentiating cytomegalovirus esophagitis from herpes simplex virus esophagitis

The endoscopic features between herpes simplex virus (HSV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) esophagitis overlap significantly, and hence the differential diagnosis between HSV and CMV esophagitis is sometimes difficult. Therefore, we developed a machine-learning-based classifier to discriminate between CMV and HSV esophagitis. We analyzed 87 patients with HSV esophagitis and 63 patients with CMV esophagitis and developed a machine-learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) system using a total of 666 endoscopic images with HSV esophagitis and 416 endoscopic images with CMV esophagitis. In the five repeated five-fold cross-validations based on the hue-saturation-brightness color model, logistic regression with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operation showed the best performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, and 1.0, respectively). Previous history of transplantation was included in classifiers as a clinical factor; the lower the performance of these classifiers, the greater the effect of including this clinical factor. Our machine-learning-based AI system for differential diagnosis between HSV and CMV esophagitis showed high accuracy, which could help clinicians with diagnoses.

Infectious diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract

A broad spectrum of pathogens produce gastrointestinal disease. The ongoing spread of human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome, the increased use of immunosuppressive therapy and the persistence of overcrowding and suboptimal sanitation in underdeveloped areas facilitate both disease transmission from environmental and foodborne sources and person-to-person transmission. Clinicians increasingly rely on endoscopic biopsy sample interpretation to diagnose gastrointestinal infections. Thus, pathologists must be aware of diagnostic features of a variety of microbial pathogens. Detection with molecular techniques also allows for correlation between infectious agents and their histopathological features, which has expanded our knowledge of the inflammatory changes produced by infectious agents. This review covers infectious disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract encountered in surgical pathology. Clinical, endoscopic and pathological features are presented. The review emphasises morphological features of viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites that may be found in tissue samples, and the inflammatory patterns that they produce. Differential diagnoses and useful ancillary techniques are discussed.

Multiple esophageal ulcers due to tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for ulcerative colitis

A 26-year-old man was admitted to our institution for ulcerative colitis treatment. He used mesalamine, steroid, immunomodulators, and anti-TNFα anti-body, but it was difficult to maintain remission. We started induction therapy with tofacitinib (TOF) 10 mg twice daily. He maintained clinical remission but had chest pain 44 days after the start of TOF. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed multiple ulcers from middle to lower esophagus. Although rare, TOF induced esophageal ulcers were considered based on his clinical course and endoscopic findings.