Prognostic significance of polyvascular disease in heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Beyond weight loss: the potential of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for treating heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome with various phenotypes, and obesity is one of the most common and clinically relevant phenotypes of HFpEF. Obesity contributes to HFpEF through multiple mechanisms, including sodium retention, neurohormonal dysregulation, altered energy substrate metabolism, expansion of visceral adipose tissue, and low-grade systemic inflammation. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a hormone in the incretin family. It is produced by specialized cells called neuroendocrine L cells located in the distal ileum and colon. GLP-1 reduces blood glucose levels by promoting glucose-dependent insulin secretion from pancreatic β cells, suppressing glucagon release from pancreatic α cells, and blocking hepatic gluconeogenesis. Recent evidence suggests that GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) can significantly improve physical activity limitations and exercise capacity in obese patients with HFpEF. The possible cardioprotective mechanisms of GLP-1 RAs include reducing epicardial fat tissue thickness, preventing activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, improving myocardial energy metabolism, reducing systemic inflammation and cardiac oxidative stress, and delaying the progression of atherosclerosis. This review examines the impact of obesity on the underlying mechanisms of HFpEF, summarizes the trial data on cardiovascular outcomes of GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and highlights the potential cardioprotective mechanisms of GLP-1 RAs to give a pathophysiological and clinical rationale for using GLP-1 RAs in obese HFpEF patients.

Polyvascular Disease: A Narrative Review of Risk Factors, Clinical Outcomes and Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Polyvascular disease has a significant global burden and is associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events with each additional vascular territory involved. The purpose of this review is to highlight the risk factors, associated outcomes, emerging genetic markers, and evidence for screening and treatment of polyvascular disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Polyvascular disease is the presence of atherosclerosis in two or more vascular beds. It has a significant global burden, with a prevalence of 30-70% in patients with known atherosclerosis. Patients with polyvascular disease experience elevated rates of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke, especially among high-risk subgroups like those with type 2 diabetes mellitus and there is a step-wise increased risk of adverse outcomes with each additional vascular territory involved. Genetic analyses demonstrate that some individuals may carry a genetic predisposition, while others exhibit higher levels of atherogenic lipoproteins and inflammatory markers. Routine screening for asymptomatic disease is not currently recommended by major cardiovascular societies unless patients are high-risk. While there are no established protocols for escalating treatment, existing guidelines advocate for lipid-lowering therapy. Additionally, recent studies have demonstrated benefit from antithrombotic agents, such as P2Y12 inhibitors and low-dose anticoagulation, but the optimal timing and dosage of these agents has not been established, and the ischemic benefit must be balanced against the increased risk of bleeding in the polyvascular population. Due to the high prevalence and risks associated with polyvascular disease, early identification and treatment intensification are crucial to reduce disease progression. Future research is needed to develop screening protocols and determine the optimal timing and dosing of therapy to prevent ischemic events.

Polyvascular atherosclerosis and renal dysfunction increase the odds of cognitive impairment in vascular disease: findings of the LipidCardio study

INTRODUCTION

Growing evidence suggests a causal role for atherosclerotic vascular disease in cognitive impairment and dementia. Atherosclerosis may present as monovascular disease (monoVD) or as widespread polyvascular atherosclerotic disease (polyVD). Evidence on the relationship between monoVD or polyVD and cognitive impairment is limited.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the LipidCardio Study. The main outcome measure was the presence of cognitive impairment, defined as a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score < 26.

RESULTS

The mean age was 71.5 years, 30.3% were female, 17.3% had no evidence of large-vessel atherosclerosis, 71.1% had monoVD, and 11.7% had polyVD, defined as the presence of atherosclerosis in ≥ 2 vascular territories (coronary, cerebral, aortic, or lower extremity). A total of 21.6% had cognitive impairment according to the prespecified cutoff (MMSE < 26). Overall, the odds of cognitive impairment increased for each additional vascular territory affected by atherosclerosis [adjusted odds ratio 1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-2.57, p = 0.003]. Furthermore, there was evidence for an interaction between vascular disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The odds of cognitive impairment were not greater in the monoVD subgroup compared to those without any atherosclerosis, if CKD was absent (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.48-2.10; p = 0.095), while the odds ratio (OR) of cognitive impairment with polyVD compared to no atherosclerosis was 2.71 (95% CI 1.10-6.92; p = 0.031). In contrast, in patients with CKD, both monoVD and polyVD were associated with significantly higher odds of cognitive impairment than no atherosclerosis.

CONCLUSIONS

PolyVD is associated with increased odds of cognitive impairment. MonoVD is associated with cognitive impairment only in the presence of CKD.

Vascular Disease Burden, Outcomes and Benefits with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure: Insights From the EMPEROR-Reduced Trial

BACKGROUND

The presence of ischemic heart disease impacts prognosis in patients affected by heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). It is not well known how the extent of vascular disease impacts prognoses and responses to therapy in this setting.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced trial, outcomes and the effects of empagliflozin, were assessed in study participants according to the extent (none vs mono1 vs poly [≥ 2] vascular bed) of vascular disease. Vascular disease was defined as investigator-reported coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral artery disease (PAD) and cerebrovascular disease at baseline. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Incidence rates are presented per 100 person-years (py) of follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 3730 study participants enrolled, 1324 (35.5%) had no vascular disease, 1879 (50.4%) had monovascular disease, and 527 (14.1%) had polyvascular disease. Participants with polyvascular disease tended to be older and male and to have had histories of hypertension, diabetes and smoking. In the placebo arm, a significantly higher risk for cardiovascular death existed in those with polyvascular disease (HR 1.57, 95% CI1.02, 2.44, compared to those with no vascular disease). In adjusted analysis, the benefit of empagliflozin in cardiovascular death or hospitalization due to HF, HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, renal composite endpoint, estimated glomerular filtration slope changes, and health status scores were seen across the 3 groups (interaction P > 0.05 for all) but were attenuated in those with polyvascular disease. Adverse events were higher in those with polyvascular disease, but no major differences were noted between empagliflozin or placebo assignment in the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with HFrEF, the extent of vascular disease is associated with the risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Empagliflozin offers cardiovascular and renal benefits in HFrEF across the extent of vascular disease, but this benefit is attenuated in those with polyvascular disease.

Patients with Polyvascular Disease: A Very High-risk Group

Polyvascular disease (PolyvascDis) with atherosclerosis occurring in >2 vascular beds (coronary, carotid, aortic, visceral and/or peripheral arteries) is encountered in 15-30% of patients who experience greater rates of major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events. Every patient with multiple CV risk factors or presenting with CV disease in one arterial bed should be assessed for PolyvascDis clinically and noninvasively prior to invasive angiography. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can be readily diagnosed in routine practice by measuring the ankle-brachial index. Carotid disease can be diagnosed by duplex ultrasound showing % stenosis and/or presence of plaques. Coronary artery disease (CAD) can be screened by determining coronary artery calcium score using coronary computed tomography angiography; further, non-invasive testing includes exercise stress and/or myocardial perfusion imaging or dobutamine stress test, prior to coronary angiography. Abdominal ultrasound can reveal an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Computed tomography angiography will be needed in patients with suspected mesenteric ischemia to assess the mesenteric arteries. Patients with the acute coronary syndrome and concomitant other arterial diseases have more extensive CAD and poorer CV outcomes. Similarly, PolyvascDis in patients with carotid disease and/or other PAD is independently associated with an increased risk for all-cause and CV mortality during long-term follow-up. Treatment of patients with PolyvascDis should include aggressive management of all modifiable risk factors by lifestyle changes and drug therapy, with particular attention to patients who are commonly undertreated, such as those with PAD. Revascularization should be reserved for symptomatic vascular beds, using the least aggressive strategy in a multidisciplinary vascular team approach.

Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Polyvascular Disease in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: The ARIC Study

BACKGROUND

Polyvascular disease is associated with increased mortality rates and decreased quality of life. Whether its prevalence or associated outcomes differ for patients hospitalized with heart failure with reduced vs preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF vs HFpEF, respectively) is uncertain.

METHODS

The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study conducted hospital surveillance of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) from 2005-2014. Polyvascular disease (coexisting disease in ≥ 2 arterial beds) was identified based on the finding of prevalent coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease or cerebrovascular disease. Mortality risks associated with polyvascular disease were analyzed separately for HFpEF and HFrEF, with adjustment for potential confounders. All analyses were weighted by the inverse of the sampling probability.

RESULTS

Of 24,937 weighted (5460 unweighted) hospitalizations due to ADHF (52% female, 32% Black, mean age 75 years), polyvascular disease was prevalent in 22% with HFrEF and in 17% with HFpEF. One-year mortality risks increased sequentially with 0, 1 and ≥ 2 arterial bed involvement, both for patients with HFrEF (29%-32%-38%; P trend = 0.0006) and for those with HFpEF (26%-32%-37%; P trend < 0.0001). After adjustments, polyvascular disease was associated with a 26% higher mortality hazard for patients with HFrEF (HR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.07-1.50) and a 29% higher hazard for patients with HFpEF (HR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.03-1.62), with no interaction by HF type (P interaction = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Patients hospitalized with ADHF and coexisting polyvascular disease have an increased risk of death, irrespective of HF type. Clinical attention should be directed toward polyvascular disease, with implementation of secondary prevention strategies to improve the prognosis of this high-risk population.

SUMMARY

Polyvascular disease is known to be associated with myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death and is a major risk factor for decreased quality of life. This study sought to evaluate the relationship between polyvascular disease and mortality in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), and to understand whether the associations differ based on ejection fraction. Patients hospitalized with ADHF and coexisting polyvascular disease had an increased risk of death, irrespective of heart failure type, implying the need for increased clinical attention directed toward polyvascular disease, along with implementation of secondary prevention strategies to improve prognosis.

TWEET

Patients hospitalized with acute HF and coexisting polyvascular disease face an increased risk of death, irrespective of HF type.

HFA-PEFF scores: prognostic value in heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The Heart Failure Association (HFA)-PEFF score is recognized as a simple method to diagnose heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between HFA-PEFF scores and cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF patients.

METHODS

A total of 502 consecutive HFpEF patients were prospectively observed for up to 1,500 days. Cardiovascular outcomes were compared between two groups of patients, defined by their HFA-PEFF scores: those who scored 2-4 (the intermediate-score group) and those who scored 5-6 group (the high-score group). Overall, 236 cardiovascular events were observed during the follow-up period (median, 1,159 days).

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there were significant differences in composite cardiovascular events and HF-related events between the intermediate-score group and the high-score group (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the HFA-PEFF scores significantly predicted future HF-related events (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 2.50; p = 0.014); receiver operating characteristic analysis confirmed this relationship (area under the curve, 0.633; 95% CI, 0.574 to 0.692; p < 0.001). The cutoff HFA-PEFF score for the identification of HF-related events was 4.5. Decision curve analysis revealed that combining the HFA-PEFF score with conventional prognostic factors improved the prediction of HF-related events.

CONCLUSION

HFA-PEFF scores may be useful for predicting HF-related events in HFpEF patients.

Influence of polyvascular disease on clinical outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation via transfemoral access

BACKGROUND

The influence of polyvascular disease (PVD) on the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation via trans-femoral access (TF-TAVI) has not been fully elucidated.

METHODS

A total of 2167 patients from the Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention-TAVI (OCEAN-TAVI) registry who underwent TF-TAVI was studied. PVD was defined as the presence of at least two of the following vascular bed (VB) diseases: concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), and peripheral artery disease (PAD).

RESULTS

Patients with PVD (288 patients, 13.3%) had a higher incidence of in-hospital complications, such as AKI (16.3% vs. 7.0%, p<0.01) and disabling stroke (3.5% vs. 1.2%, p<0.01) than patients without PVD. These complications caused higher rates of procedural mortality (4.5% vs. 2.0%, p<0.01). PVD increased the risk of the 2-year rate of cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.50; p<0.05); however, non-cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke was not associated with PVD. Worsening heart failure (4.6% vs. 1.1%, p<0.01) was the main cause of cardiovascular death among patients with PVD. In a sub-analysis, compared with patients with AS alone, those with 2 VB diseases (CAD+PAD; adjusted HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.06-3.53; p<0.05) and 3 VB diseases (CAD+CVD+PAD; adjusted HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.21-5.62; p<0.05) had a higher risk of 2-year cardiovascular death.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased prevalence of concomitant atherosclerotic VB diseases before TF-TAVI may increase the rates of in-hospital complications and 2-year cardiovascular death. Given the higher rate of mortality in patients with PVD undergoing TF-TAVI, future studies focusing on medical therapy are needed to reduce long-term cardiovascular events in this high-risk subset.

Association between polyvascular disease and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock: Results from the RESCUE registry

BACKGROUND

Clinical implications of systemic atherosclerosis in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) remain unclear. This study investigated the association between polyvascular disease (PVD) and clinical outcome in CS patients.

METHODS

A total of 1247 CS patients was enrolled from the RESCUE registry, a multicenter, observational cohort between January 2014 and December 2018. They were divided into two groups according to presence of PVD, defined as ≥2 coexistence of coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, or cerebrovascular disease. Primary outcome was all-cause death during 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

136 (10.9%) patients were diagnosed with PVD. The risk of 12-month all-cause death was significantly higher in the PVD group than in the non-PVD group (54.4% versus 40.4%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.69, p = 0.034). There was a significant interaction between PVD and vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) (p for interaction = 0.014). Among the 945 patients with VIS <84, PVD was associated with a higher risk of 12-month all-cause death (unadjusted HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.30-2.41, p = 0.030); among the 302 patients with VIS ≥84, the incidence of 12-month all-cause death was similar between the PVD and non-PVD groups (unadjusted HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.68-1.56, p = 0.301).

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of PVD was associated with 12-month all-cause mortality in patients with CS, especially for less severe forms of CS patients with VIS <84. Clinicaltrials.govnumber:NCT02985008.

The controlling nutritional status score predicts outcomes of cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Backgrounds

The relationship between cardiovascular outcomes and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the score and cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF patients.

Methods and results

A total of 506 consecutive HFpEF patients were prospectively observed for up to 1500 days or until the occurrence of cardiovascular events. The mean age was 71.6 ± 9.4 years. Cardiovascular outcomes were compared between the CONUT score 0–1 group with a normal nutritional state (normal group), the CONUT score 2–4 group with a light degree of undernutrition (light group), and the CONUT score 5–8 group with a moderate degree of undernutrition (moderate group). In this study, there were no patients who scored 9–12, which was defined as a severe state of undernutrition. Overall, 238 cardiovascular events were observed during the follow-up period (median: 1159 days). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the moderate group was at higher risk of composite cardiovascular events than the normal group (P < 0.001) and the light group (P = 0.031). The analysis also showed that the light group was at higher risk of composite cardiovascular events than the normal group (P = 0.038). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis with the significant factors from the univariate analysis showed that the CONUT score (hazard ratio: 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.21, P = 0.005) significantly predicted future cardiovascular events.

Conclusion

Nutritional screening using the CONUT score may be useful for predicting cardiovascular events in HFpEF patients.

The impact of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction for the prognosis in patients with lower extremity arterial disease

Aims

Lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) share many risk factors, but the characteristics of LVDD and its association with prognosis in patients with LEAD have not been fully examined.

Methods and results

We investigated the impact of LVDD on the clinical outcomes in LEAD patients. LVDD was classified according to the newest suggested classification by the American Society of Echocardiography. Survival analysis for mortality (primary endpoint) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE; secondary endpoint) was calculated with all clinical variables and adjusted by multivariate Cox regression. We consecutively enrolled 221 controls and 464 LEAD patients from outpatient clinics and hospitals. The prevalence of LVDD was proportional to the severity of LEAD defined by the Rutherford class. The difference of LVDD severity is significant when compared with the control and LEAD patients or LEAD patients who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT), and it is also proportional to the LEAD severity. The grade of LVDD was a significant factor in predicting MACE and mortality in LEAD patients after multivariate Cox regression analysis [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.47–2.83, P = 0.026; HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.02–2.02, P = 0.041]. This impact remained significant in LEAD patients who underwent EVT.

Conclusions

The degree of LVDD may predict MACE and mortality in LEAD patients. Whether early identification of LVDD in LEAD patients is helpful warrants further large‐scale prospective randomized studies.