Surgery for small cell lung cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Survey from 2010 to 2015

RESILIENT Part 2: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study of Liposomal Irinotecan Versus Topotecan in Adults With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The phase III RESILIENT trial compared second-line liposomal irinotecan with topotecan in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with SCLC and progression on or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous (IV) liposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m2 every 2 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or IV topotecan (1.5 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks in a 6-week cycle). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Among 461 randomly assigned patients, 229 received liposomal irinotecan and 232 received topotecan. The median follow-up was 18.4 months. The median OS was 7.9 months with liposomal irinotecan versus 8.3 months with topotecan (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.37]; P = .31). The median PFS per blinded independent central review (BICR) was 4.0 months with liposomal irinotecan and 3.3 months with topotecan (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.20]; nominal P = .71); ORR per BICR was 44.1% (95% CI, 37.6 to 50.8) and 21.6% (16.4 to 27.4), respectively. Overall, 42.0% and 83.4% of patients receiving liposomal irinotecan and topotecan, respectively, experienced grade ≥3 related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most common grade ≥3 related TEAEs were diarrhea (13.7%), neutropenia (8.0%), and decreased neutrophil count (4.4%) with liposomal irinotecan and neutropenia (51.6%), anemia (30.9%), and leukopenia (29.1%) with topotecan.

CONCLUSION

Liposomal irinotecan and topotecan demonstrated similar median OS and PFS in patients with relapsed SCLC. Although the primary end point of OS was not met, liposomal irinotecan demonstrated a higher ORR than topotecan. The safety profile of liposomal irinotecan was consistent with its known safety profile; no new safety concerns emerged.

Surgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Stage I Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A 25-Year Experience

OBJECTIVES

Small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is usually a wide-spread, highly-lethal malignancy but occasionally presents as localized, limited stage cancer amenable to local treatment. We reviewed our experience using surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to assess safety, survival rates and treatment toxicity in clinical stage I SCLC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic medical records of patients with clinical stage I lymph node-negative SCLC who underwent surgical resection or SBRT between 1996 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. A multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards model was constructed.

RESULTS

Of 96 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 77 underwent resection and 19 underwent SBRT. Surgical patients were younger (mean 68.4 ± 9.2 years surgery versus 74.3 ± 6.6 years SBRT, P = .005) and had better pulmonary function (81.5 ± 19.6 FEV1% of predicted surgery versus 44.0 ± 20.9% SBRT, P < .001). SBRT patients had significantly more comorbidities. For both cohorts, 59 tumors were pure SCLC and 37 were mixed SCLC/NSCLC histology. Median survivals were 21 months versus 31 months for SBRT and surgery patients respectively (P = .07). There were no treatment-related mortalities. Mean length of hospital stay for surgical patients was 5.4 ± 5.7 days. Survival was longer in lymph node-negative surgery patients (median 48 months node-negative versus 19 months node-positive, P = .04). For node-negative-surgery patients, the estimated 2- and 5-year survival rates are 60% and 48%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-institutional experience over 25 years demonstrates that local treatment with surgery or SBRT for clinical stage I SCLC is safe and effective, with survivals lower than similar stage non-small-cell carcinoma patients. However, our results compare favorably with prior small-cell surgical series and far better than reported results of chemoradiotherapy for similar stage patients, thereby validating current recommendations for employing surgery or SBRT for stage I SCLC.

Different treatment modalities on the prognosis of patients with stage I-IIIa small cell lung cancer: a population based study

Background

Several studies have shown that surgery may improve prognosis in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). This study aimed to compare the effects of different treatment modalities on lung cancer specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) in LS-SCLC patients.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients diagnosed with LS-SCLC. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the effect of each factor on LCSS and OS. Multivariate analysis was used to analyze the relationship between patient characteristics and survival of different treatment modalities.

Results

After a series of screening steps, this study ultimately analyzed the prognosis of patients with stage I-IIIa SCLC under different treatment modalities. The results showed that lobectomy plus postoperative chemoradiotherapy was significantly better than chemoradiotherapy or lobectomy in treatment (all P<0.05). For stage II and IIIA patients, lobectomy plus postoperative chemotherapy ± radiotherapy had similar efficacy to chemoradiotherapy in improving patients' LCSS and OS (all P>0.05), and lobectomy plus postoperative chemotherapy ± radiotherapy did not significantly improve LCSS or OS compared with lobectomy (all P>0.05).

Conclusions

For stage II-IIIa SCLC patients, lobectomy might have similar efficacy to chemoradiotherapy in improving LCSS and OS, and there is no need for adjuvant chemotherapy ± radiotherapy after surgery. For stage I SCLC patients, lobectomy plus postoperative chemoradiotherapy might be superior to chemoradiotherapy or lobectomy in improving LCSS and OS; however, the conclusion might be biased. These results suggest that the effect of surgery on SCLC patients may be worthy of further study.

Closing the RCT Gap-A Large Meta-Analysis on the Role of Surgery in Stage I-III Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

Despite clear guideline recommendations, surgery is not consistently carried out as part of multimodal therapy in stage I small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. The role of surgery in stages II and III is even more controversial. In the absence of current randomized control trials (RCT), we performed a meta-analysis comparing surgery versus non-surgical treatment in stage I to III SCLC patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 1 July 2023, focusing on studies pertaining to the impact of surgery on small cell lung cancer (SCLC). These studies were evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. Statistical analyses, including I² tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests, and Egger regression, were performed to assess the data. In addition, 5-year survival rates were analyzed. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA standards.

RESULTS

Among the 6826 records identified, 10 original studies encompassing a collective cohort of 95,323 patients were incorporated into this meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was observed across the included studies, with no discernible indication of publication bias. Analysis of patient characteristics revealed no significant differences between the two groups (p-value > 0.05). The 5-year survival rates in a combined analysis of patients in stages I-III were 39.6 ± 15.3% for the 'surgery group' and 16.7 ± 12.7% for the 'non-surgery group' (p-value < 0.0001). SCLC patients in stages II and III treated outside the guideline with surgery had a significantly better 5-year survival compared to non-surgery controls (36.3 ± 20.2% vs. 20.2 ± 17.0%; p-value = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of current RCTs, this meta-analysis provides robust suggestions that surgery might significantly improve survival in all SCLC stages. Non-surgical therapy could lead to a shortening of life. The feasibility of surgery in non-metastatic SCLC should always be evaluated as part of a multimodal treatment.

Survival of small-cell lung cancer patients after surgery: A single-center retrospective cohort study

This study summarized and analyzed the clinical characteristics and prognosis of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients after surgical treatment. The clinical data of 130 patients (99 males and 31 females) with SCLC treated by surgery and confirmed by postoperative pathological examination at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from April 2004 to April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical characteristics, surgery, pathological stage, and perioperative treatment were summarized. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regression analysis were performed. Pathological examination revealed that 36 (27.69%) patients had stage I SCLC, 22 (16.92%) patients had stage II SCLC, 65 (50.00%) patients had stage III SCLC, and 7 (5.39%) patients had stage IV SCLC. The overall median survival time was 50 months (95% confidence interval, 10.8-89.2 months). The median survival time of stage I, II, III and IV SCLC patients was 148, 42, 32, and 10 months, respectively. In patients who underwent surgical treatment, postoperative adjuvant therapy and tumor stage were independent prognostic factors for survival (p < 0.05).Lobectomy and lymph nodes resection combined with adjuvant therapy were cautiously recommended for stage I-IIIa SCLC patients.

Advancing immunotherapy in small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a rapidly progressive neuroendocrine carcinoma that, until recently, had a very small armamentarium of effective treatments. Advances in DNA sequencing and whole transcriptomics have delineated key subtypes; therefore, SCLC is no longer viewed as a homogeneous cancer. Chemoimmunotherapy with PD1 blockade is now the standard of care for advanced disease, and ongoing research efforts are moving this strategy into the limited stage setting. Combination strategies of immunotherapy with radiation are also under active clinical trial in both limited and extensive stage disease. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a rapidly progressive neuroendocrine carcinoma that, until recently, had a very small armamentarium of effective treatments. Chemoimmunotherapy with immune check point inhibitors is now the standard of care for advanced disease. This comprehensive review provides an overview of current treatment strategies for SCLC, unmet needs in this patient population, and emerging treatment strategies incorporating immunotherapy that will hopefully further improve outcomes for patients.

A 15-Gene-Based Risk Signature for Predicting Overall Survival in SCLC Patients Who Have Undergone Surgical Resection

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a malignancy with a poor prognosis whose treatment has not progressed for decades. The survival benefit of surgery and the selection of surgical candidates are still controversial in SCLC. This study is the first report to identify transcriptomic alterations associated with prognosis and propose a gene expression-based risk signature that can be used to predict overall survival (OS) in SCLC patients who have undergone potentially curative surgery. An integrative transcriptome analysis of three gene expression datasets (GSE30219, GSE43346, and GSE149507) revealed 1734 up-regulated and 2907 down-regulated genes. Cox-Mantel test, Cox regression, and Lasso regression analyses were used to identify genes to be included in the risk signature. EGAD00001001244 and GSE60052-cohorts were used for internal and external validation, respectively. Overall survival was significantly poorer in patients with high-risk scores compared to the low-risk group. The discriminatory performance of the risk signature was superior to other parameters. Multivariate analysis showed that the risk signature has the potential to be an independent predictor of prognosis. The prognostic genes were enriched in pathways including regulation of transcription, cell cycle, cell metabolism, and angiogenesis. Determining the roles of the identified prognostic genes in the pathogenesis of SCLC may contribute to the development of new treatment strategies. The risk signature needs to be validated in a larger cohort of patients to test its usefulness in clinical decision-making.

A multicenter, single-arm, open study of neoadjuvant or conversion atezolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in resectable small cell lung cancer (Cohort Study)

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the prospects of using chemotherapy in combination with atezolizumab in the neoadjuvant or conversion treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

Prior to surgery, untreated patients with limited-stage SCLC received three cycles of neoadjuvant or conversion atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy of etoposide and platinum. The primary endpoint of the trial was pathological complete response (pCR) in the per-protocol (PP) cohort. In addition, safety was assessed based on treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Overall, 13 of 17 patients (including 14 males and 3 females) underwent surgery. In the PP cohort, pCR and major pathological response were observed in 8 (8/13, 61.5%) and 12 (12/13, 92.3%) patients, respectively. According to the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the pCR and major pathological response in the ITT cohort were 47.1% (8/17) and 70.6% (12/17), respectively. In addition, an overall response rate of 100% was recorded in the PP cohort. Moreover, 15 (15/17, 88.2%) patients and 1 (1/17, 5.9%) in the ITT cohort attained partial remission (PR), and complete remission, respectively, with an overall response rate of 94.1%. The median overall survival of the patients of pCR and the median event-free survival of the patients on surgery had not achieved. However, the median overall survival of the patients of non-pCR was 18.2 months and the median event-free survival of the nonsurgical patients was 9.5 months. During the neoadjuvant treatment, the incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 58.8% (10/17). Additionally, three patients (17.6%) developed immune-related adverse event (grades 1-2).

CONCLUSION

In patients with SCLC, neoadjuvant or conversion atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy significantly improved pCR with manageable AEs. Therefore, this regimen may be considered a safe and effective treatment for SCLC.

Differences between Advanced Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Advanced Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background: Nowadays, the characteristics and treatment of advanced pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) remain controversial. This study aimed to analyze the similarity of clinical characteristics, survival outcomes and treatment modalities between advanced LCNEC and advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC) to provide more evidence for the study of advanced LCNEC. Methods: All SCLC and LCNEC patient data were obtained from the SEER database (2010-2019). Pearson's χ2 test was used to compare the differences in clinical characteristics. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to balance the bias of the variables between patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. KM analysis was used to calculate survival. Results: A total of 1094 patients with IV LCNEC and 20939 patients with IV SCLC were included in this study. The demographic characteristics and tumor characteristics of IV LCNEC and IV SCLC were different (p < 0.05). After PSM, the overall survival (OS) for IV LCNEC and IV SCLC was 6.0 months, the cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 7.0 months, and there was no significant difference in OS or CSS between the two groups. Risk/protective factors for OS and CSS were similar for IV LCNEC and IV SCLC patients. Survival outcomes were similar in patients with IV LCNEC and IV SCLC with different treatment modalities; chemoradiotherapy significantly improved OS and CSS in patients with IV LCNEC (9.0 months) and SCLC (10.0 months), however, radiotherapy alone did not improve survival in patients with IV LCNEC. Conclusions: These results confirmed that the prognosis and treatment modalities are similar and that advanced LCNEC could be treated as advanced SCLC, which provide new evidence for the treatment of advanced LCNEC patients.

Resected cytokeratin-negative small cell lung carcinoma

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), a malignancy of neuroendocrine origin, can show varied morphologies and patterns but is typically positive for at least one neuroendocrine marker and almost always for cytokeratins. It is essential to distinguish this tumour due to its characteristic genetic features, aggressive behaviour, propensity for metastasis and responsiveness to chemotherapy. We hereby present a rare case of a pulmonary mass that showed morphological features of an SCLC but lacked cytokeratin expression on biopsy as well as resection specimens. Various cytokeratins were tested on multiple blocks and at different laboratories. A broad differential diagnosis was considered and ruled out including small round blue cell tumours, non-SCLC and metastasis. After performing an extensive work-up to identify the origin of this tumour, it was finally diagnosed as SCLC with expression of neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin and CD56, and intracytoplasmic electron dense neurosecretory granules (250-350 nm) however lacked cytokeratin expression.

Clinical and prognostic implications of CD47 and PD-L1 expression in surgically resected small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological inhibition of the immune-checkpoint molecule CD47 has shown promising results in preclinical small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) models, whereas anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have been recently implemented in the standard of care of advanced-stage SCLC patients. Nevertheless, the expression pattern, clinical relevance and prognostic implication of both CD47 and PD-L1 are rather controversial in surgically treated SCLC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 104 Caucasian SCLC patients from two Central European thoracic centers were included in this study. CD47 and PD-L1 expression as well as the expression of the four major SCLC molecular subtype markers (ASCL1, NEUROD1, YAP1 and POU2F3) were measured by immunohistochemistry. Expression levels were independently evaluated and statistically correlated with clinicopathological data and survival.

RESULTS

Positive CD47 and PD-L1 expressions were seen in 84.6% and 9.6% of the samples, respectively. Meanwhile, the tumor-associated stroma was positive for PD-L1 in 59.6% of the cases. Stromal PD-L1 expression correlated with longer overall survival (OS) (versus PD-L1-negative stroma; median OS was 42 versus 14 months, respectively, P = 0.003) and was confirmed as an independent predictor of favorable outcome upon multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.530, 95% confidence interval 0.298-0.943, P = 0.031). Notably, neither CD47 nor PD-L1 presence was related to a distinct molecular SCLC subtype.

CONCLUSION

CD47 shows a remarkably high expression while tumoral PD-L1 expression is generally low in surgically treated SCLC. Importantly, stromal PD-L1 expression may indicate a favorable clinical outcome and serve as a novel prognostic factor in these patients. Additional studies are warranted to further investigate the clinical impact of CD47 and PD-L1 expression in SCLC.

Redefining the role of surgery in early small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Resection is guideline recommended in stage I small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) but not in stage II. In this stage, patients are treated with a non-surgical approach. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the role of surgery in both SCLC stages. Surgically treated patients were compared to non-surgical controls. Five-year survival rates were analysed.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on December 01, 2021 in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. Studies published since 2004 on the effect of surgery in SCLC were considered and assessed using ROBINS-I. We preformed I²-tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests and Egger-regression. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA.

RESULTS

Out of 6826 records, we identified seven original studies with a total of 15,170 patients that met our inclusion criteria. We found heterogeneity between these studies and ruled out any publication bias. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups (p-value > 0.05). The 5-year survival rates in stage I were 47.4 ± 11.6% for the 'surgery group' and 21.7 ± 11.3% for the 'non-surgery group' (p-value = 0.0006). Our analysis of stage II SCLC revealed a significant survival benefit after surgery (40.2 ± 21.6% versus 21.2 ± 17.3%; p-value = 0.0474).

CONCLUSION

Based on our data, the role of surgery in stage I and II SCLC is robust, since it improves the long-term survival in both stages significantly. Hence, feasibility of surgery as a priority treatment should always be evaluated not only in stage I SCLC but also in stage II, for which guideline recommendations might have to be reassessed.

Stage I and II Small-Cell Lung Cancer-New Challenge for Surgery

Purpose

The recommended treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) currently is surgery in stage I disease. We wondered about stage II SCLC and present a meta-analysis on mean-survival of patients that underwent surgery for stage I and II compared to controls.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed on December 01st 2021 in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. We considered studies published on the effect of surgery in SCLC since 2004 and assessed them using ROBINS-I. We preformed I²-tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests and Egger-regression. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA.

Results

Out of 6826 records, seven studies with a total of 11,241 patients (‘surgery group’: 3911 patients; ‘non-surgery group’: 7330; treatment period: 1984–2015) were included. Heterogeneity between the studies was revealed in absence of any publication bias. Patient characteristics did not differ between the groups (p-value > 0.05). The mean-survival in an analysis of patients in stage I was 36.7 ± 10.8 months for the ‘surgery group’ and 20.3 ± 5.7 months for the ‘non-surgery group’ (p-value = 0.0084). A combined analysis of patients in stage I and II revealed a mean-survival of 32.0 ± 16.7 months for the ‘surgery group’ and 19.1 ± 6.1 months for the ‘non-surgery group’ (p-value = 0.0391). In a separate analysis of stage II, we were able to demonstrate a significant survival benefit after surgery (21.4 ± 3.6 versus 16.2 ± 3.9 months; p-value = 0.0493).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis shows a significant survival benefit after surgery not only in the recommended stage I but also in stage II SCLC. Our data suggests that both stages should be considered for surgery of early SCLC.

New perspectives in the management of small cell lung cancer

The treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a challenge for all specialists involved. New treatments have been added to the therapeutic armamentarium in recent months, but efforts must continue to improve both survival and quality of life. Advances in surgery and radiotherapy have resulted in prolonged survival times and fewer complications, while more careful patient selection has led to increased staging accuracy. Developments in the field of systemic therapy have resulted in changes to clinical guidelines and the management of patients with advanced disease, mainly with the introduction of immunotherapy. In this article, we describe recent improvements in the management of patients with SCLC, review current treatments, and discuss future lines of research.

Surgical Principles in the Management of Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors: Open Questions and Controversial Technical Issues

OPINION STATEMENT

Primary neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lung represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies arising from the endocrine cells, involving different entities, from well differentiated to highly undifferentiated neoplasms. Because of the predominance of poorly differentiated tumors, advanced disease is observed at diagnosis in more than one third of patients making chemo- or chemoradiotherapy the only possible treatment. Complete surgical resection, as defined as anatomical resection plus systematic lymphadenectomy, becomes a reliable curative option only for that little percentage of patients presenting with stage I (N0) high-grade NETs. On the other hand, complete surgical resection is considered the mainstay treatment for localized low- and intermediate-grade NETs. Therefore, in the era of the mini-invasive surgery, their indolent behavior has suggested that parenchyma-sparing resections could be as adequate as the anatomical ones in terms of oncological outcomes, leading to discuss about the correct extent of resection and about the role of lymphadenectomy when dealing with highly differentiated NETs.

Prognosis and Survival Analysis of 922,317 Lung Cancer Patients from the US Based on the Most Recent Data from the SEER Database (April 15, 2021)

Background

On April 15, 2021, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database released the latest lung cancer follow-up data. We selected 922,317 lung cancer patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2017 for survival analysis to provide updated data for lung cancer researchers.

Research Question

This study explored the latest trends of survival time in terms of gender, race, nationality, age, income, address, histological type and primary site.

Study Design and Methods

The SEER database covers 27.8% of the US population. We used life table, Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, Breslow and Tarone-Ware tests to calculate survival rate, time, and curve and to compare differences in survival distribution. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses.

Results

The median survival time of all lung cancer patients diagnosed in 2017 increased by 41.72% compared to 2000. Median survival time of female patients diagnosed in 2017 increased by 70.94% compared to 2000. Median survival time of those diagnosed in 2017 for different primary sites was as follows: right middle lobe was the longest, then left lower lobe, right upper lobe, right lower lobe, and left upper lobe. Lung cancer patients older than 75 years had a significantly shorter median survival time. Patients living in metropolitan areas of 250,000 to 1 million had a longer median survival time. Median survival time in the adenocarcinoma group was significantly greater than other patients. Median survival of Asian and other races diagnosed in 2017 was 97.87% higher than those diagnosed in 2000. Survival rate of lung cancer increased gradually with the year of diagnosis.

Interpretation

The rapid improvement of the prognosis of female and young lung cancer patients contributes to the improvement of the overall prognosis. Primary lung cancer in the right middle lobe has the best prognosis.

Social Disparities in Lung Cancer

Social disparities in lung cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival have been studied using national databases, statewide registries, and institution-level data. Some disparities emerge consistently, such as lower adherence to treatment guidelines and worse survival by race and socioeconomic status, whereas other disparities are less well studied. A critical appraisal of current data is essential to increasing equity in lung cancer care.

Clinical Significance of CYFRA21-1, AFP, CA-153, CEA, and CA-199 in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Ocular Metastasis in Hypertension Population

Purpose: To detect lung metastases, we conducted a retrospective study to improve patient prognosis.

Methods: Hypertension patients with ocular metastases (OM group; n = 58) and without metastases (NM group; n = 1,217) were selected from individuals with lung cancer admitted to our hospital from April 2005 to October 2019. The clinical characteristics were compared by Student's t-test and chi-square test. Independent risk factors were identified by binary logistic regression, and their diagnostic value evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: Age and sex did not differ significantly between OM and NM groups; There were significant differences in pathological type and treatment. Adenocarcinoma was the main pathological type in the OM group (67.24%), while squamous cell carcinoma was the largest proportion (46.43%) in the NM group, followed by adenocarcinoma (34.10%). The OM group were treated with chemotherapy (55.17%), while the NM group received both chemotherapy (39.93%) and surgical treatment (37.06%). Significant differences were detected in the concentrations of cancer antigen (CA)−125, CA-199, CA-153, alpha fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin fraction 21-1 (CYFRA21-1), total prostate-specific antigen, alkaline phosphatase, and hemoglobin (Student's t-test). Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that CA-199, CA-153, AFP, CEA, and CYRFA21-1 were independent risk factors for lung cancer metastasis. AFP (98.3%) and CEA (89.3%) exhibited the highest sensitivity and specificity, respectively, while CYRFA21-1 had the highest area under the ROC curve value (0.875), with sensitivity and specificity values of 77.6 and 87.0%, respectively. Hence, CYFRA21-1 had the best diagnostic value.

Prognostic factors of patients with small cell lung cancer after surgical treatment

Background

The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend surgical treatment for patients with stages I–IIA small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but it still cannot deny the effect of surgical treatment on other limited-stage SCLC. Although more advanced diagnostic methods are now used for the diagnosis and classification of SCLC, the selection of surgical candidates is still arbitrary.

Methods

Data were collected from patients with SCLC who underwent surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2011 to January 2021. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate cumulative survival curves, and log-rank test was used to evaluate differences among different subgroups. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the predictive power of the variables for prognosis and survival.

Results

Smoking index, surgical resection method, TNM stage of postoperative pathology, and postoperative chemotherapy were significantly correlated with postoperative survival (P<0.05), which were independent predictors for postoperative survival. Patients with a smoking index >800 had a higher risk of death after surgery [hazard ratio (HR): 7.050, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.079–16.143, P<0.001]. Compared with patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy, those who underwent other pneumoresections (e.g., wedge resection, segmental resection, sleeve resection) had an increased risk of death (HR: 2.822, 95% CI: 1.030–7.734, P=0.044). Compared with stage I patients, stage II and stage III patients had an increased risk of death, with HRs of 6.039 and 3.145, respectively. Compared with those who received ≤4 courses of postoperative chemotherapy, those who received >4 courses of postoperative chemotherapy had reduced postoperative mortality risk (HR: 0.211, 95% CI: 0.097–0.459, P<0.001).

Conclusions

A high smoking index suggests worse prognosis; therefore, patients who smoke should be advised to quit smoking. Compared with stage II and stage III patients, surgical treatment is recommended for stage I SCLC patients. TNM staging, especially N staging, should be evaluated prior to surgery. Pulmonary lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection should be the preferred surgical treatment for patients with SCLC. Patients should receive at least 5 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery.

The Proposition of the Pulmonary Route as an Attractive Drug Delivery Approach of Nano-Based Immune Therapies and Cancer Vaccines to Treat Lung Tumors

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related deaths globally, making it a major health concern. The lung’s permissive rich microenvironment is ideal for supporting outgrowth of disseminated tumors from pre-existing extra-pulmonary malignancies usually resulting in high mortality. Tumors occurring in the lungs are difficult to treat, necessitating the need for the development of advanced treatment modalities against primary tumors and secondary lung metastasis. In this review, we explore the pulmonary route as an attractive drug delivery approach to treat lung tumors. We also discuss the potential of pulmonary delivery of cancer vaccine vectors to induce mucosal immunity capable of preventing the seeding of tumors in the lung.

The current role of surgery and SBRT in early stage of small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Early stage small cell lung cancer (T1-2N0M0SCLC) represents 7% of all SCLC. The standard treatment in patients with intrathoracic SCLC disease is the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Nowadays, the recommended management of this highly selected group is surgical resection due to favorable survival outcomes. For medically inoperable patients or those who refuse surgery, there is an increasing interest in evaluating the role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for T1-2N0SCLC, transferring the favorable experience obtained on inoperable NSCLC (Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer). In the era of multimodality treatment, adjuvant systemic therapy plays an important role even in the management of early SCLC, increasing the disease-free survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). The benefit of Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI), that currently has a Category I recommendation for localized stage SLCL, remains controversial in this selected subgroup of patients due to the lower risk of brain metastasis.

AIM

This review summarizes the most relevant data on the local management of T1-2N0M0SCLC (surgery and radiotherapy), and evaluates the relevance of adjuvant treatment.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

Provides a critical evaluation of best current clinical management options for T1-2N0M0 SCLC.

Impact of treatment modality on long-term survival of stage IA small-cell lung cancer patients: a cohort study of the U.S. SEER database

Background

The optimal treatment modality for patients with stage IA (T1N0M0) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is still unclear.

Methods

Patients who received surgical resection or chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) between January 2004 and December 2014 were identified from The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Surgical resection included lobectomy, wedge resection, segmentectomy with lymphadenectomy [examined lymph node (ELN) ≥1]. Propensity score match analysis was utilized to balance the baseline characteristics.

Results

A total of 686 stage IA SCLC cases were included: 337 patients underwent surgery and 349 patients were treated by CRT alone. Surgery achieved a better outcome than CRT alone, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.495. Patients who underwent lobectomy demonstrated a longer overall survival (OS), compared to those who received sublobectomy (crude cohort, median OS, 69 vs. 38 months; match cohort, median OS, 67 vs. 38 months). Patients with ELN >7 presented with longer OS than those with ELN ≤7 (crude cohort, median OS, 91 vs. 49 months; matched cohort, median OS, 91 vs. 54 months). The additional efficacy of chemotherapy or radiotherapy in patients receiving lobectomy was observed. The best prognosis was achieved in the lobectomy plus CRT cohort, with a 5-year survival rate of 73.5%.

Conclusions

The prolonged survival associated with lobectomy and chemotherapy or radiotherapy presents a viable treatment option in the management of patients with stage IA SCLC.

Comparative study of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis between combined and pure small cell lung cancer (SCLC) after surgical resection

Background

Histologically, SCLC are classified as pure (P‐SCLC) and combined subtypes (C‐SCLC). Currently, few studies compare the clinicopathological characteristics and explore the treatment strategies applied to them.

Methods

Between July 2005 and April 2016, the clinical records of 297 postoperative patients with pathologically confirmed SCLC were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox regression model were separately used for stratified univariate and multivariate survival analysis.

Results

A total of 46 cases (15.5%) of C‐SCLCs and 251 cases (85.5%) of pure SCLCs (P‐SCLCs) were included in this study. The average age of C‐SCLCs was a little higher than that of P‐SCLCs (59.65 ± 8.72 vs. 56.56 ± 10.12; P = 0.053). More patients had a history of smoking in C‐SCLC (78.3% vs. 63.3%; P = 0.074). The five‐year overall survival (OS) rate for P‐SCLCs and C‐SCLCs was 65.1% and 56.7%, respectively (P = 0.683). For P‐SCLC, stage and an intervention of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were independent factors that affected OS. In C‐SCLCs cases, performing sublobectomy was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis.

Conclusions

We identified no significant difference in clinical characteristics and outcome between C‐SCLCs and P‐SCLCs. However, the factors affecting the prognosis of the two subtypes were slightly inconsistent. For C‐SCLCs, the extent of resection had a greater impact on survival, and lobectomy combined with systemic lymph node dissection should therefore be performed as extensively as possible. In addition, PCI was beneficial in improving the SCLC OS rate.

Key points

This study demonstrated the prognosis of C‐SCLCs did not significantly differ from that of P‐SCLCs, but was more susceptible to the extent of resection. Patients with C‐SCLC who underwent limited resection had a significantly increased risk of shorter OS.

This study highlighted the importance of performing lobectomy for resectable C‐SCLC patients. This study also proved the benefit of PCI in improving the OS rate for both P‐SCLC and C‐SCLC patients.