1
|
Parikh KP, Motiwala M, Beer-Furlan A, Michael LM, Rangarajan SV, Choby GW, Kshettry VR, Saleh S, Mukherjee D, Kirsch C, McKean E, Sorenson JM. Skull Base Registries: A Roadmap. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 83:561-578. [PMID: 36393883 PMCID: PMC9653294 DOI: 10.1055/a-1934-9191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Hospitals, payors, and patients increasingly expect us to report our outcomes in more detail and to justify our treatment decisions and costs. Although there are many stakeholders in surgical outcomes, physicians must take the lead role in defining how outcomes are assessed. Skull base lesions interact with surrounding anatomy to produce a complex spectrum of presentations and surgical challenges, requiring a wide variety of surgical approaches. Moreover, many skull base lesions are relatively rare. These factors and others often preclude the use of prospective randomized clinical trials, thus necessitating alternate methods of scientific inquiry. In this paper, we propose a roadmap for implementing a skull base registry, along with expected benefits and challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara P. Parikh
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
| | - Mustafa Motiwala
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
| | - Andre Beer-Furlan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - L. Madison Michael
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
| | - Sanjeet V. Rangarajan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
| | - Garret W. Choby
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Varun R. Kshettry
- Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Sara Saleh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Debraj Mukherjee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Campus, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Claudia Kirsch
- Yale University School of Medicine Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
- Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, England
- Mount Sinai Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
| | - Erin McKean
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Jeffrey M. Sorenson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bolther M, Henriksen J, Holmberg MJ, Jessen MK, Vallentin MF, Hansen FB, Holst JM, Magnussen A, Hansen NS, Johannsen CM, Enevoldsen J, Jensen TH, Roessler LL, Carøe Lind P, Klitholm MP, Eggertsen MA, Caap P, Boye C, Dabrowski KM, Vormfenne L, Høybye M, Karlsson M, Balleby IR, Rasmussen MS, Pælestik K, Granfeldt A, Andersen LW. Ventilation Strategies During General Anesthesia for Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anesth Analg 2022; 135:971-985. [PMID: 35703253 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal ventilation strategy during general anesthesia is unclear. This systematic review investigated the relationship between ventilation targets or strategies (eg, positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP], tidal volume, and recruitment maneuvers) and postoperative outcomes. METHODS PubMed and Embase were searched on March 8, 2021, for randomized trials investigating the effect of different respiratory targets or strategies on adults undergoing noncardiac surgery. Two investigators reviewed trials for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed for relevant outcomes, and several subgroup analyses were conducted. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS This review included 63 trials with 65 comparisons. Risk of bias was intermediate for all trials. In the meta-analyses, lung-protective ventilation (ie, low tidal volume with PEEP) reduced the risk of combined pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.49; 9 trials; 1106 patients), atelectasis (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25-0.60; 8 trials; 895 patients), and need for postoperative mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.13-1.00; 5 trials; 636 patients). Recruitment maneuvers reduced the risk of atelectasis (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.92; 5 trials; 328 patients). We found no clear effect of tidal volume, higher versus lower PEEP, or recruitment maneuvers on postoperative pulmonary complications when evaluated individually. For all comparisons across targets, no effect was found on mortality or hospital length of stay. No effect measure modifiers were found in subgroup analyses. The certainty of evidence was rated as very low, low, or moderate depending on the intervention and outcome. CONCLUSIONS Although lung-protective ventilation results in a decrease in pulmonary complications, randomized clinical trials provide only limited evidence to guide specific ventilation strategies during general anesthesia for adults undergoing noncardiac surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Bolther
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
| | | | - Mathias J Holmberg
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Cardiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Marie K Jessen
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mikael F Vallentin
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas H Jensen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Narvik, Norway
| | - Lara L Roessler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | - Mark A Eggertsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Philip Caap
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
| | - Caroline Boye
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Lasse Vormfenne
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria Høybye
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mathias Karlsson
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Ida R Balleby
- National Hospital of the Faroe Islands, Torshavn, Faroe Islands
| | - Marie S Rasmussen
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Kim Pælestik
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Asger Granfeldt
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars W Andersen
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care.,Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Holst JM, Klitholm MP, Henriksen J, Vallentin MF, Jessen MK, Bolther M, Holmberg MJ, Høybye M, Lind PC, Granfeldt A, Andersen LW. Intraoperative Respiratory and Hemodynamic Strategies for Reducing Nausea, Vomiting, and Pain after Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2022; 66:1051-1060. [PMID: 35924389 PMCID: PMC9545575 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite improved medical treatment strategies, post-operative pain, nausea, and vomiting remain major challenges. This systematic review investigated the relationship between perioperative respiratory and hemodynamic interventions and postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting. METHODS PubMed and Embase were searched on March 8, 2021 for randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of perioperative respiratory or hemodynamic interventions in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Investigators reviewed trials for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed when feasible. GRADE was used to assess the certainty in the evidence. RESULTS This review included 65 original trials; of these 48% had pain, nausea and/or vomiting as the primary focus. No reduction of postoperative pain was found in meta-analyses when comparing recruitment maneuvers with no recruitment, high (80%) to low (30%) fraction of oxygen, low (5-7 ml/kg) to high (9-12 ml/kg) tidal volume, or goal-directed hemodynamic therapy to standard care. In the meta-analysis comparing recruitment maneuvers with no recruitment maneuvers, patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery had less shoulder pain 24 hours postoperatively (mean difference in the numeric rating scale from 0 to 10: -1.1, 95% CI: -1.7, -0.5). In meta-analyses, comparing high to low fraction of inspired oxygen and goal-directed hemodynamic therapy to standard care in patients undergoing abdominal surgery, the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting was reduced (odds ratio: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.87 and 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.85). The certainty in the evidence was mostly very low to low. The results should be considered exploratory given the lack of pre-specified hypotheses and corresponding risk of Type 1 errors. CONCLUSION There is limited evidence regarding the impact of intraoperative respiratory and hemodynamic interventions on postoperative pain or nausea and vomiting. More definitive trials are needed to guide clinical care within this area. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanne M Holst
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maibritt P Klitholm
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jeppe Henriksen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mikael F Vallentin
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Marie K Jessen
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria Bolther
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mathias J Holmberg
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Maria Høybye
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Carøe Lind
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Asger Granfeldt
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars W Andersen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pituitary Gland Surgical Emergencies. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2022; 55:397-410. [DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2021.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|