The effect of preventive use of hydrolyzed protein formula milk on gastrointestinal diseases and physical development of premature infants: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Indications for extensively hydrolyzed cow's milk protein in the neonatal period

A large proportion of prescriptions for extensively hydrolyzed cow's milk protein (CMP) in newborns are not based on any scientific data justifying the indication. Many of these prescriptions are old habits or are based on incomplete data. The aim of this article is to analyze these practices and propose recommendations. The following points are covered: (a) indications for extensively hydrolyzed formula based on studies demonstrating their benefits in these situations-newborns with a proven allergy to CMP and occasional prescription of supplements to breastfeeding; (b) possible indications not based on a high level of evidence-re-initiation of feeding due to necrotizing enterocolitis, short bowel syndrome, re-initiation of feeding of newborns following intestinal surgery, and laparoschisis if neither the mother's own milk nor milk from a lactarium is available; (c) unjustified indications-newborns at risk of atopy, prematurity, severe neurological pathologies, newborns who are hemodynamically unstable and/or have congenital cardiopathy, neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy treated with hypothermia, and newborns with esophageal atresia or diaphragmatic hernia. By following this classification, the prescriber will be guided to use the milk best suited to the pathology, bearing in mind that each situation must be adapted individually and the tolerance and effectiveness of the food reassessed from a nutritional and functional point of view.

Effects of olfactory and/or gustatory stimuli on feeding of preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To evaluate the effect of olfactory and/or gustatory stimulation interventions on feeding outcomes in preterm infants.

METHODS

We conducted systematic searches across various academic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Wanfang Database, and the Wipu Database. These searches aimed to identify randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of olfactory and/or gustatory stimulation on preterm infants. The search period spanned from the inception of the databases until December 2022. Two independent evaluators autonomously reviewed the literature, extracted pertinent data, assessed the quality of the included studies, and conducted a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 7 randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies were included, with a total of 871 participants. Olfactory and gustatory stimulation demonstrated a reduction in the time to full enteral feeds in preterm infants when compared to usual care (MD = -1.60 days; 95% CI = -2.31, -0.89; p<0.0001). No substantial evidence was identified regarding the influence of olfactory and gustatory stimulation on the duration of gastric tube placement, length of hospitalization, incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis, or occurrence of spontaneous bowel perforation in preterm infants.

CONCLUSIONS

Olfactory and gustatory stimulation show potential benefits for preterm infants. However, due to the low to very low level of certainty associated with the available data, our ability to assess the effects is limited. Further trials and studies are essential to enhance our understanding of the mechanisms and effectiveness of olfactory and gustatory stimulation therapies.