Clinical effectiveness of liraglutide on weight loss in South Koreans: First real-world retrospective data on Saxenda in Asia

GLP-1 increases preingestive satiation via hypothalamic circuits in mice and humans

GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are effective anti-obesity drugs. However, the precise central mechanisms of GLP-1RAs remain elusive. We administered GLP-1RAs to obese patients and observed heightened sense of preingestive satiation. Analysis of human and mouse brain samples pinpointed GLP-1R neurons in the dorsomedial hypothalamus (DMH) as candidates for encoding preingestive satiation. Optogenetic manipulation of DMHGLP-1R neurons caused satiation. Calcium imaging demonstrated that these neurons are actively involved in encoding preingestive satiation. GLP-1RA administration increased the activity of DMHGLP-1R neurons selectively during eating behavior. We further identified an intricate interplay between DMHGLP-1R neurons and arcuate NPY/AgRP neurons (ARCNPY/AgRP), to regulate food intake. Our findings reveal a hypothalamic mechanism through which GLP-1RAs control preingestive satiation, offering novel neural targets for obesity and metabolic diseases.

Effectiveness and safety of drugs for obesity

Recent publicity around the use of new antiobesity medications (AOMs) has focused the attention of patients and healthcare providers on the role of pharmacotherapy in the treatment of obesity. Newer drug treatments have shown greater efficacy and safety compared with older drug treatments, yet access to these drug treatments is limited by providers' discomfort in prescribing, bias, and stigma around obesity, as well as by the lack of insurance coverage. Now more than ever, healthcare providers must be able to discuss the risks and benefits of the full range of antiobesity medications available to patients, and to incorporate both guideline based advice and emerging real world clinical evidence into daily clinical practice. The tremendous variability in response to antiobesity medications means that clinicians need to use a flexible approach that takes advantage of specific features of the antiobesity medication selected to provide the best option for individual patients. Future research is needed on how best to use available drug treatments in real world practice settings, the potential role of combination therapies, and the cost effectiveness of antiobesity medications. Several new drug treatments are being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials, suggesting that the future for pharmacotherapy of obesity is bright.

[Translated article] Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonists for Treating Obesity in Patients With Immune-Mediated Skin Diseases

Psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa are often associated with obesity. Because chronic low-grade inflammation underlies these 2 diseases, they can progress to more severe forms in patients with obesity if weight-reduction measures are not taken. This review covers pharmacologic alternatives for treating obesity, with emphasis on the benefits associated with the novel use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists that act on satiety receptors. These drugs have led to greater weight loss in clinical trials and real-world settings than orlistat, which until recently was the only drug approved for treating obesity in the European Union. Although experience with GLP-1 agonists in patients with obesity and inflammatory skin diseases is currently scarce, the promising results reported suggest they may offer a useful tool for managing obesity.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonists for Treating Obesity in Patients With Immune-Mediated Skin Diseases

Psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa are often associated with obesity. Because chronic low-grade inflammation underlies these 2 diseases, they can progress to more severe forms in patients with obesity if weight-reduction measures are not taken. This review covers pharmacologic alternatives for treating obesity, with emphasis on the benefits associated with the novel use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists that act on satiety receptors. These drugs have led to greater weight loss in clinical trials and real-world settings than orlistat, which until recently was the only drug approved for treating obesity in the European Union. Although experience with GLP-1 agonists in patients with obesity and inflammatory skin diseases is currently scarce, the promising results reported suggest they may offer a useful tool for managing obesity.

Effects of liraglutide on ANP secretion and cardiac dynamics

To observe the effects of liraglutide (analog of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1)) on atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) secretion and atrial dynamics, an ex vivo isolated rat atrial perfusion model was used to determine atrial ANP secretion and pulse pressure. DPP-4-/- mice were also established in vivo. ANP levels were determined by radioimmunoassay; GLP-1 content was determined by Elisa. The expression levels of GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R), PI3K/AKT/mTOR, piezo 1, and cathepsin K were analyzed by Western blot. In the clinical study, patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) had low levels of plasma GLP-1 but relatively high levels of plasma ANP. In ex vivo (3.2 nmol/L) and in vivo (30 μg/kg) models, liraglutide significantly decreased ANP levels and atrial pulse pressure. Exendin9-39 alone (GLP-1R antagonist) reversibly significantly increased ANP secretion, and the reduction effect of liraglutide on the secretion of ANP was significantly alleviated by Exendin9-39. Exendin9-39 demonstrated slightly decreased atrial pulse pressure; however, combined liraglutide and Exendin9-39 significantly decreased atrial pulse pressure. Ly294002 (PI3K/AKT inhibitor) inhibited the increase of ANP secretion by liraglutide for a short time, while Ly294002 didn't counteract the decrease in pulse pressure by liraglutide in atrial dynamics studies. Liraglutide increased the expression of GLP-1R and PI3K/AKT/mTOR in isolated rat atria and the hearts of mice in vivo, whereas Exendin9-39 reversibly reduced the expression of GLP-1R and PI3K/AKT/mTOR. Piezo 1 was significantly decreased in wild type and DPP-4-/- mouse heart or isolated rat atria after being treated with liraglutide. Cathepsin K expression was only decreased in in vivo model hearts. Liraglutide can inhibit ANP secretion while decreasing atrial pulse pressure mediated by GLP-1R. Liraglutide probably plays a role in the reduction of ANP secretion via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Piezo 1 and cathepsin K may be involved in the liraglutide mechanism of reduction.

A nationwide pharmacovigilance investigation on trends and seriousness of adverse events induced by anti-obesity medication

Introduction

Despite rising concerns regarding the safety of anti-obesity medications, there is a lack of comprehensive pharmacovigilance investigations utilising real-world data. We aimed to characterise the prevalence and seriousness of adverse drug events (ADEs) related to anti-obesity medications and to identify predictors associated with increased risk of serious adverse events (SAE), thereby conveying evidence on drug safety.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis on ADE cases spontaneously reported to the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System Database (KIDS-KD). ADE reports pertaining to anti-obesity medications prescribed for overweight, obesity (International Classification of Disease, 10th revision (ICD-10) code E66) and abnormal weight gain (ICD-10 code E63.5) were included in the analysis. We performed a disproportionality to detect the association of the system organ class-based ADEs with their seriousness an individual's sex by estimating reporting odds ratios (RORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We performed logistic regression to investigate factors that are substantially associated with increased SAE risks by estimating odds ratio (OR) and their 95% CIs.

Results

The most common causative anti-obesity medication was phentermine, followed by liraglutide. ADEs associated with psychiatric disorders (ROR = 1.734; 95% CI = 1.111-2.707), liver and biliary system disorders (ROR = 22.948; 95% CI = 6.613-70.635), cardiovascular disorders (ROR = 5.707; 95% CI = 1.965-16.574), and respiratory disorders (ROR = 4.567; 95% CI = 1.774-11.762) were more likely to be serious events. Additionally, men are more likely to experience ADEs related gastrointestinal disorders (ROR = 1.411) and less likely to have heart and rhythm disorders (ROR = 0.507). The risk of SAE incidences was positively correlated with being male (OR = 2.196; 95% CI = 1.296-3.721), dual or triple combination of anti-obesity medications (OR = 3.258; 95% CI = 1.633-6.501 and OR = 8.226; 95% CI = 3.046-22.218, respectively), and concomitant administration of fluoxetine (OR = 5.236; 95% CI = 2.218-12.365).

Conclusions

Seriousness of anti-obesity medication-related ADEs differs among system-organ class, while sex-related differences in ADE profiles are also present. The predictors substantially increasing risk of SAE incidences include being male, having a higher number of concomitant medications (including multiple combination of anti-obesity medications), and concurrent use of fluoxetine. Nonetheless, further pharmacovigilance investigation and monitoring are needed to enhance awareness on ADEs induced by anti-obesity medications.

Effect of liraglutide on cardiometabolic profile and on bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with obesity and metabolic syndrome

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and obesity represent a public health problem worldwide. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a practical and effective way of evaluating body composition, especially abdominal fat. Liraglutide, a GLP-1 analog, reduces body weight and improves cardiometabolic parameters. In this prospective non-randomized intervention study, we evaluated the effect of 6 months of treatment with liraglutide (n = 57) on the clinical, laboratory and BIA findings of adult sex-stratified patients diagnosed with obesity and MetS, compared to a control group receiving sibutramine (n = 46). The groups were statistically similar with regard to the age of females (p = 0.852) and males (p = 0.657). Almost all anthropometric and BIA variables were higher in the treatment group than in the comparative group (p < 0.05). Abdominal circumference (AC) decreased significantly more in the treatment group. In males, body weight and fat mass also decreased (p < 0.05). Liraglutide treatment was associated with a greater reduction in trunk fat mass (FMT) (p < 0.05). AC and FMT were strongly correlated (rho = 0.531, p < 0.001) in the treatment group. In the multiple regression analysis, liraglutide treatment remained independently associated with FMT. Treatment with liraglutide for 6 months promoted weight loss, improved cardiometabolic and inflammatory parameters and led to a significant reduction in FMT correlated with AC in obese MetS patients of both sexes.

Effectiveness, persistence of use, and safety of orlistat and liraglutide in a group of patients with obesity

BACKGROUND

To determine the effectiveness, persistence of use, adverse reactions, interactions of orlistat and liraglutide taken for weight loss by a group of obese patients in Colombia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective follow-up study of a cohort of patients with obesity treated with orlistat or liraglutide. Sociodemographic, clinical, and pharmacological variables were identified. The effectiveness for weight loss at 12-16 and 52 weeks, persistence of use, and safety were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 294 patients were followed up. At 12-16 weeks after starting orlistat and liraglutide, weight losses of -1.2kg (p=0.002) and -4.1kg (p<0.001) were observed, respectively, and at 52 weeks, reductions of -1.6kg (p=0.208) and -7.8kg (p<0.001) were observed. A total of 8.8% and 31.3% of patients treated with orlistat and liraglutide, respectively, persisted with treatment 1 year after initiation. A total of 17.3% had adverse drug reactions. Older adults with grade II or III obesity who performed physical activity and those treated with liraglutide were more likely to have lost at least 5% of their body weight at 12-16 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Orlistat and liraglutide users presented weight loss at 12-16 weeks. However, this effect was greater and sustained with liraglutide, especially when combined with physical activity.

Marked weight loss on liraglutide 3.0 mg: Real-life experience of a Swiss cohort with obesity

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the effectiveness of liraglutide 3.0 mg daily in combination with a standardized multidisciplinary intervention on body weight and body composition changes in a real-life setting.

METHODS

A prospective, observational cohort study design was used. Adult patients with BMI > 35 kg/m² , or BMI > 28 kg/m² with greater than or equal to one metabolic comorbidity, were included (n = 54, 65% women). Liraglutide treatment was covered by Swiss health insurance. Clinical and biological data were collected at baseline, 4 months, and 10 months. Body composition was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 10 months.

RESULTS

At 10 months, mean (SD) percentage weight loss (WL%) was -12.4% (5.5%) or -14.1 (6.6) kg. WL% was ≥5% in 87% of patients at 4 months and in 96% at 10 months. WL% was higher in women (-9.5% [3.1%] vs. men -7.2% [2.5%], p = 0.02) at 4 months and persisted at 10 months (-13.7% [5.2%] vs. -9.6% [5.1%], p = 0.006). WL% was associated with baseline percentage fat mass but not with age or BMI. Body composition showed a decrease in fat mass, visceral adipose tissue, and absolute lean mass.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world setting, liraglutide 3.0 mg led to beneficial changes in WL and body composition, with a greater impact in women.

A Study on Weight Loss Cause as per the Side Effect of Liraglutide

Purpose

Liraglutide is known to have much lower weight loss effects in real clinical fields than in randomized clinical trials because of its side effects (SE) and discomfort associated with injections. This study is aimed at determining whether the side effects of liraglutide affect weight reduction and its maintenance in real-world practice.

Methods

Endocrinologists conducted a retrospective chart review of data from two tertiary university hospitals. All patients who had been prescribed liraglutide at least once between January 2014 and December 2019 were included. For an average of 3 and 6 months, weight changes due to the presence or absence of SE and discontinuation (MAIN or STOP) of liraglutide were checked.

Results

Only 40.8% (64/157) of the patients remained on liraglutide for 6 months; 14.7% (23/157) maintained the drug despite SEs (MAIN_SE(+)), and 40.1% (63/157) discontinued the drug despite not having SEs (STOP_SE(-)). At 3 months, there was -5.9 ± 0.6%, -7.9 ± 0.9%, -4.5 ± 0.5%, and -3.4 ± 0.6% weight reduction in the MAIN_SE(-), MAIN_SE(+), STOP_SE(-), and STOP_SE(+) groups, respectively (all p < 0.001 compared to the baseline). However, there were no significant differences in the weight loss between the MAIN (p = 0.062) and STOP (p = 0.204) groups. At 6 months, the weight reduction was -2.0 ± 0.5% (p < 0.001) in MAIN_SE(-), -2.2 ± 0.7% (p < 0.005) in MAIN_SE(+), -1.7 ± 0.7% (p < 0.01) in STOP_SE(-), and -2.0 ± 0.6% (p = 0.01) in STOP_SE(+), compared to baseline. SEs also caused no significant differences in weight loss between the MAIN (p = 0.787) and STOP (p = 0.694) groups.

Conclusions

Our study confirmed that the side effects of liraglutide did not affect weight reduction. Moreover, in the real world, the continuous rate of liraglutide use is not high, and the weight gradually increases after 3 months. Therefore, in addition to the side effects of liraglutide, the medical staff should consider various factors that affect drug adherence, consider ways to increase compliance, and continue to ensure management so that patients can maintain their weight.

The Impact Once-Weekly Semaglutide 2.4 mg Will Have on Clinical Practice: A Focus on the STEP Trials

Obesity is a complex and chronic disease that raises the risk of various complications. Substantial reduction in body weight improves these risk factors. Lifestyle changes, including physical activity, reduced caloric ingestion, and behavioral therapy, have been the principal pillars in the management of obesity. In recent years, pharmacologic interventions have improved remarkably. The Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity (STEP) program is a collection of phase-III trials geared toward exploring the utility of once-weekly 2.4 mg semaglutide administered subcutaneously as a pharmacologic agent for patients with obesity. All the STEP studies included diet and exercise interventions but at different intensities. This review paper aims to explore the impact of the behavioral programs on the effect of semaglutide 2.4 mg on weight loss. The results of the STEP trials supported the efficacy of high-dose, once-weekly 2.4 mg semaglutide on body weight reduction among patients with obesity with/without diabetes mellitus. Semaglutide was associated with more gastrointestinal-related side effects compared to placebo but was generally safe and well tolerated. In all the STEP studies, despite the varying intestines of the behavioral programs, weight loss was very similar. For the first time, there may be a suggestion that these behavioral programs might not increase weight reduction beyond the effect of semaglutide. Nevertheless, the importance of nutritional support during substantial weight loss with pharmacotherapy needs to be re-evaluated.