Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of morphine dependence: A retrospective study

Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the rehabilitation of patients with addiction: current status and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are severe conditions that remain extremely challenging to treat in clinical practice. With high rates of non-response to current treatment options and several SUDs with no approved interventions, novel therapies are needed. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can non-invasively modulate the neurocircuitry of brain-based disorders, and investigation into its therapeutic potential for SUDs is growing rapidly.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize the clinical research to date evaluating its safety and efficacy for various SUDs. We highlight the investigations comparing different stimulation parameters to present our current understanding on optimal stimulation parameters. Additionally, we cover key research avenues in the use of neuroimaging to guide treatment, cue-induction paradigms, and adjunctive or combination treatments that may optimize outcomes.

EXPERT OPINION

Evidence of rTMS as an effective treatment for certain SUDs has emerged and is preliminary for others. There are a growing number of studies showing benefit and meta-analyses suggesting that rTMS can significantly reduce substance craving and consumption. However, the optimal approach has not been determined, and there is a great deal of heterogeneity in rTMS protocols and mixed outcomes. Further research into strategies for enhancing precision will be crucial in moving the field forward.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuromodulation therapies for substance use disorders

While pharmacological, behavioral and psychosocial treatments are available for substance use disorders (SUDs), they are not always effective or well-tolerated. Neuromodulation (NM) methods, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) may address SUDs by targeting addiction neurocircuitry. We evaluated the efficacy of NM to improve behavioral outcomes in SUDs. A systematic literature search was performed on MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and PubMed databases and a list of search terms for four key concepts (SUD, rTMS, tDCS, DBS) was applied. Ninety-four studies were identified that examined the effects of rTMS, tDCS, and DBS on substance use outcomes (e.g., craving, consumption, and relapse) amongst individuals with SUDs including alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, stimulants, and opioids. Meta-analyses were performed for alcohol and tobacco studies using rTMS and tDCS. We found that rTMS reduced substance use and craving, as indicated by medium to large effect sizes (Hedge's g > 0.5). Results were most encouraging when multiple stimulation sessions were applied, and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was targeted. tDCS also produced medium effect sizes for drug use and craving, though they were highly variable and less robust than rTMS; right anodal DLPFC stimulation appeared to be most efficacious. DBS studies were typically small, uncontrolled studies, but showed promise in reducing misuse of multiple substances. NM may be promising for the treatment of SUDs. Future studies should determine underlying neural mechanisms of NM, and further evaluate extended treatment durations, accelerated administration protocols and long-term outcomes with biochemical verification of substance use.

Non-invasive brain stimulation combined with psychosocial intervention for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This review investigates the efficacy and safety of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) combined with psychosocial intervention on depressive symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched five electronic databases from their inception to June 2021: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Medline. Randomized or non-randomized clinical trials in which NIBS plus psychosocial intervention was compared to control conditions in people with depressive symptoms were included.

RESULTS

A total of 17 eligible studies with 660 participants were included. The meta-analysis results showed that NIBS combined with psychosocial therapy had a positive effect on moderate to severe depression ([SMD = - 0.46, 95%CI (- 0.90, - 0.02), I² = 73%, p < .01]), but did not significantly improve minimal to mild depression ([SMD = - 0.12, 95%CI (- 0.42, 0.18), I² = 0%, p = .63]). Compared with NIBS alone, the combination treatment had a significantly greater effect in alleviating depressive symptoms ([SMD = - 0.84, 95%CI (- 1.25, - 0.42), I² = 0%, p = .93]). However, our results suggested that the pooled effect size of ameliorating depression of NIBS plus psychosocial intervention had no significant difference compared with the combination of sham NIBS [SMD = - 0.12, 95%CI (- 0.31, 0.07), I² = 0%, p = .60] and psychosocial intervention alone [SMD = - 0.97, 95%CI (- 2.32, 0.38), I² = 72%, p = .01].

CONCLUSION

NIBS when combined with psychosocial intervention has a significant positive effect in alleviating moderately to severely depressive symptoms. Further well-designed studies of NIBS combined with psychosocial intervention on depression should be carried out to consolidate the conclusions and explore the in-depth underlying mechanism.