Comparison of catheter-over-needle and catheter-through-needle methods in ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block: A prospective, randomized controlled trial

Assessment of catheter position using chest CT in adults undergoing erector spinae plane analgesia for rib fractures: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) analgesia is a common adjuvant for patients with traumatic rib fracture pain and success relies on the ESP catheter remaining within the correct fascial plane for the duration of its placement. However, knowledge on postplacement position of indwelling ESP catheters is largely absent. We hypothesized that migration of over-the-needle ESP catheters was common and detectable with coincidental postprocedure CT.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective cohort study, adults admitted to the surgical intensive care unit for traumatic rib fractures between January 2020 and July 2022 were screened. Those receiving continuous ESP analgesia via indwelling catheter and undergoing subsequent chest CT were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of catheters that migrated outside the ESP. The secondary outcome was the distance between the catheter tip and the nearest transverse process (TP) or fascial plane.

RESULTS

160 medical records were screened for eligibility and 15 patients (18 catheters) met the inclusion criteria. 16 of 18 catheters reviewed were found outside the ESP. Furthermore, catheter position was reported as intramuscular in 14 catheters and subcutaneous in 4 catheters. The median distance between catheter tip and the nearest TP (or the ESP) was 23.20 mm sagittally and 25.05 mm axially.

CONCLUSIONS

Most ESP catheters were found superficial to the fascial plane in the days following their placement. The median distance between the catheter and the ESP is between 23 and 25 mm. Prospective studies should address catheter migration concerns and propose solutions to this common issue.

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks for analgesia following painful ambulatory surgery: a review with focus on recent developments in infusion technology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (cPNB) decrease pain scores and opioid consumption while improving patient satisfaction following ambulatory surgery. This review focuses on the history and evolution of ambulatory cPNBs, recent developments in infusion technology that may prolong the duration of analgesia, optimal choice of cPNB for various surgical procedures, and novel analgesic modalities that may prove to be alternatives or supplements to cPNBs.

RECENT FINDINGS

The primary factor limiting the duration of an ambulatory cPNB is the size of the local anesthetic reservoir. Recent evidence suggests the use of automated boluses, as opposed to continuous infusions, may decrease the rate of consumption of local anesthetic and, thereby, prolong the duration of analgesia. Utilizing a long-acting local anesthetic (e.g. ropivacaine) for initial block placement and an infusion start-delay timer may further increase this duration.

SUMMARY

Patients undergoing painful ambulatory surgery are likely to have less pain and require fewer opioid analgesics when receiving a cPNB for postoperative analgesia. Advances in electronic pumps used for cPNBs may increase the duration of these benefits.

Comparison of Continuous and Programmed Intermittent Bolus Infusion of 0.2% Ropivacaine after Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

Background

Despite the clinical effectiveness of the programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) method for epidural analgesia, evidence for this method in continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CIBPB) is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the pain relief effect after arthroscopic shoulder surgery according to the administration method by comparing the PIB and continuous infusion methods among the administration methods of local anesthetics.

Methods

Sixty-four patients aged >19 years scheduled for elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery were enrolled and divided into two groups. Ultrasound-guided CIBPB was performed to control postoperative pain. The infusion pump was programmed so that 0.2% ropivacaine was continuously injected at 1.1 mL/h in group A, whereas in group B, 0.1 mL/h was continuously injected and 4 mL was periodically injected at 4 h intervals. In both groups, a further infusion of 4 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered if the patient requested additional analgesia, and the lockout time was set at 30 min. Postoperative pain quality was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), and the incidence of patients requiring additional analgesics, motor blockade using a modified Bromage scale (MBS), and consumed doses of local anesthetic were assessed.

Results

The VAS and incidence of rescue analgesics were performed when the patient could communicate voluntarily after admission to the post-anesthetic care unit, and at 24 and 48 h after surgery showed no significant difference between the two groups. The MBS at 24 h after surgery was significantly higher in group B (p = 0.038). In the comparison of consumed doses of local anesthetic, group B had a significantly higher bolus injection dose (p = 0.047) and frequency of bolus use in the 24 h after surgery (p = 0.034).

Conclusion

The PIB method in CIBPB after arthroscopic shoulder surgery provided a similar analgesic effect, with a higher bolus injection dose of local anesthetic and increased motor blockade than the continuous infusion method.