Current status of laparoscopic hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic literature review

Navigating the Future of 3D Laparoscopic Liver Surgeries: Visualization of Internal Anatomy on Laparoscopic Images With Augmented Reality

INTRODUCTION

Liver tumor resection requires precise localization of tumors and blood vessels. Despite advancements in 3-dimensional (3D) visualization for laparoscopic surgeries, challenges persist. We developed and evaluated an augmented reality (AR) system that overlays preoperative 3D models onto laparoscopic images, offering crucial support for 3D visualization during laparoscopic liver surgeries.

METHODS

Anatomic liver structures from preoperative computed tomography scans were segmented using open-source software including 3D Slicer and Maya 2022 for 3D model editing. A registration system was created with 3D visualization software utilizing a stereo registration input system to overlay the virtual liver onto laparoscopic images during surgical procedures. A controller was customized using a modified keyboard to facilitate manual alignment of the virtual liver with the laparoscopic image. The AR system was evaluated by 3 experienced surgeons who performed manual registration for a total of 27 images from 7 clinical cases. The evaluation criteria included registration time; measured in minutes, and accuracy; measured using the Dice similarity coefficient.

RESULTS

The overall mean registration time was 2.4±1.7 minutes (range: 0.3 to 9.5 min), and the overall mean registration accuracy was 93.8%±4.9% (range: 80.9% to 99.7%).

CONCLUSION

Our validated AR system has the potential to effectively enable the prediction of internal hepatic anatomic structures during 3D laparoscopic liver resection, and may enhance 3D visualization for select laparoscopic liver surgeries.

Association between Unplanned Conversion and Patient Survival after Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Unplanned conversion (UPC) is considered to be a predictor of poor postoperative outcomes. However, the effects of UPC on the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes between patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and those who underwent UPC for HCC. Among 1029 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy between 2004 and 2021, 251 were eligible for the study. Of 251 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC in PS segments, 29 (26.0%) required UPC, and 222 underwent LLR. After 1:5 PSM, 25 patients were selected for the UPC group and 125 for the LLR group. Blood loss, transfusion rate, hospital stay, and postoperative complication were higher in the UPC group. Regarding oncologic outcomes, although the 5-year overall survival rate was similar in both groups (p = 0.544), the recurrence-free survival rate was lower in the UPC group (p < 0.001). UPC was associated with poor short-term as well as inferior long-term outcomes compared with LLR for HCC in PS segments. Therefore, surgeons must carefully select patients and consider early conversion if unexpected bleeding occurs to maintain safety and oncologic outcomes.

A novel Laennec's capsule tunnel approach for pure laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy: a propensity score matching study

Background

With the development of laparoscopic hepatectomy, there are different surgical approaches and pedicle anatomical methods for laparoscopic left hepatectomy. Combined with our practical experience, we proposed a method of transhepatic Laennec membrane tunnel for laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (LT-LLH) and investigated the feasibility by comparison with the extrahepatic Glissonian approach for laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (GA-LLH).

Patients and methods

The data of patients who underwent laparoscopic left hepatectomy in the Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic surgery of Fujian Provincial Hospital from December 2019 to March 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 45 cases underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy with an extrahepatic Glissonian approach, and 38 cases underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy via transhepatic Laennec membrane tunnel approach. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) method was performed to compare the perioperative indexes and long-term tumor prognosis between the two groups.

Results

After 1:1 PSM, 33 patients in each group were selected for further analysis. Compared with the GA-LLH group, the operation time of the LT-LLH group was shorter. There was no significant difference in the incidence of total complications between the two groups. Moreover, no statistical differences were found in disease-free survival and overall survival between the two groups.

Conclusion

It is safe, faster, and convenient for selective appropriate cases to carry out laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy through the hepatic Laennec membrane tunnel, which is suitable for clinical promotion.

Biliary-enteric reconstruction in laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and quality of biliary-enteric reconstruction (BER) in laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (LsRRH) versus open surgery and propose technical recommendations.

METHODS

Data of 38 LsRRH and 54 radical laparotomy resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (LtRRH) cases were collected from our institution. BER was evaluated via biliary residuals numbers, number of anastomoses, anastomosis manner, suture method, time consumption, and postoperative complication.

RESULTS

In the LsRRH group, patients were relatively younger; Bismuth type I had a higher proportion while type IIIa and IV were less and required no revascularization. In LsRRH and LtRRH groups, respectively, the biliary residuals number was 2.54 ± 1.62 and 2.47 ± 1.46 (p > 0.05); the number of anastomoses was 2.04 ± 1.27 and 2.57 ± 1.33 (p > 0.05); the time of BER was 65.67 ± 21.53 and 42.5 ± 19.77 min (p < 0.05), 15.08 ± 3.64% and 11.76 ± 2.54% of the total operation time (p < 0.05); postoperative bile leakage incidence was 15.79% and 16.67% (p > 0.05); 14 ± 10.28 and 17 ± 9.73 days for healing (p < 0.05); anastomosis stenosis rate was 2.63% and 1.85% (p > 0.05). Neither group had a biliary hemorrhage or bile leakage-related death.

CONCLUSION

The selection bias in LsRRH mainly affects tumor resection than BER. Our cohort study indicates that BER in LsRRH is technically feasible and equals anastomotic quality to open surgery. However, its longer and a more significant proportion of total operation time represent that BER has higher technical requirements and is one of the critical rate-limiting steps affecting the minimal invasiveness of LsRRH.

Liver resection versus transarterial chemoembolisation for the treatment of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is the primary treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), according to the updated Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. Although growing evidence favours liver resection (LR) over TACE for intermediate-stage HCC, the best treatment option remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) after LR versus TACE for intermediate-stage HCC.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed. Studies that compared the efficacy of LR and TACE in patients with intermediate (BCLC stage B) HCC were selected. According to the recent updated BCLC classification, intermediate stage of HCC was defined as follows: (a) four or more HCC nodules of any size, or (b) two or three nodules, but if at least one tumour is larger than 3 cm. The main outcome was OS, expressed as the hazard ratio.

RESULTS

Nine eligible studies of 3355 patients were included in the review. The OS of patients who underwent LR was significantly longer than that of patients who underwent TACE (hazard ratio=0.52; 95% CI: 0.39-0.69; I2=79%). Prolonged survival following LR was confirmed after sensitivity analysis of five studies using propensity score matching (HR=0.45; 95% CI: 0.34-0.59; I2=55%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with intermediate-stage HCC who underwent LR had a longer OS that those who underwent TACE. The role of LR in patients with BCLC stage B should be clarified in future randomised controlled trials.

Multiplication of tumor maximum diameter and number as a new surgical indicator for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

Recent advances in treatment modalities have been made, limiting the indication of hepatic resection in the treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This retrospective study investigated the significance of multiplication of tumor maximum diameter and number (MDN) as a surgical indicator for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer intermediate-stage HCC.

METHODS

A total of 49 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer intermediate-stage HCC who underwent curative hepatic resection between 2000 and 2020 were enrolled in this study. Prognostic factors of overall survival and disease-free survival, including the product of MDN, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with MDN >12 experienced significantly worse prognosis compared with those with MDN ≤12 (p = 0.0395), and 5-year overall survival rates after hepatic resection were 60.0% and 23.4%, respectively. Furthermore, the disease-free survival rate of patients with MDN >12 was significantly worse compared with those with MDN ≤12 (p = 0.0049), and all patients with MDN >12 experienced recurrence within 3 years after hepatic resection. In the multivariate analysis, MDN >12 was identified as the only independent prognostic factor of both overall survival and disease-free survival. In addition, patients with MDN >12 suffered from uncontrollable recurrence by locoregional treatment, such as more than four intrahepatic and extrahepatic recurrences, after hepatic resection.

CONCLUSIONS

MDN index might be a new surgical indicator for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer intermediate-stage HCC, and influence clinical decision-making for individual treatment strategies.

Advances in the surgical treatment of liver cancer

Liver resection is the standard curative treatment for liver cancer. Advances in surgical techniques over the last 30 years, including the preoperative assessment of the future liver remnant, have improved the safety of liver resection. In addition, advances in nonsurgical multidisciplinary treatment have increased the opportunities for tumor downstaging. Consequently, the indications for resection of more advanced liver cancer have expanded. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted liver resections have also gradually become more widespread. These techniques should be performed in stages, depending on the difficulty of the procedure. Advances in preoperative simulation and intraoperative navigation technology may have also lowered the threshold for their performance and may have promoted their widespread use. New insights and experiences gained from laparoscopic surgery may be applicable in open surgery. Liver transplantation, which is usually indicated for patients with poor liver function, has also become safer with advances in perioperative management. The indications for liver transplantation in liver cancer are also expanding. Although the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has forced the postponement of liver resection and transplantation procedures, liver surgeons should appropriately tailor the surgical plan to the individual patient as part of multidisciplinary treatment. This review may provide an entry point for future clinical research by identifying currently unresolved issues regarding liver cancer, and particularly hepatocellular carcinoma.