Liver steatosis is a risk factor for hepatotoxicity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease under immunosuppressive treatment

Identification and validation of hub genes expressed in ulcerative colitis with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

Objective

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) are closely intertwined; however, the precise molecular mechanisms governing their coexistence remain unclear.

Methods

We obtained UC (GSE75214) and MASLD (GSE151158) datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were acquired by the 'edgeR' and 'limma' packages of R. We then performed functional enrichment analysis of common DEGs. Hub genes were selected using the cytoHubba plugin and validated using GSE87466 for UC and GSE33814 for MASLD. Immunohistochemistry was employed to validate the hub genes' expression in clinical samples. Immune infiltration and gene set enrichment analyses of the hub genes were performed. Finally, we estimated the Spearman's correlation coefficients for the clinical correlation of the core genes.

Results

Within a cohort of 26 differentially regulated genes in both UC and MASLD, pathways involving cytokine-mediated signaling, cell chemotaxis, and leukocyte migration were enriched. After further validation, CXCR4, THY1, CCL20, and CD2 were identified as the hub genes. Analysis of immune infiltration patterns highlighted an association between elevated pivotal gene expression and M1 macrophage activation. Immunohistochemical staining revealed widespread expression of pivotal genes in UC- and MASLD-affected tissues. Furthermore, significant correlations were observed between the increased expression of hub genes and biochemical markers, such as albumin and prothrombin time.

Conclusion

This bioinformatics analysis highlights CXCR4, THY1, CCL20, and CD2 as crucial genes involved in the co-occurrence of UC and MASLD, providing insights into the underlying mechanisms of these two conditions.

Prevalence of Hepatobiliary Manifestations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A GRADE Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of more than 1.7 Million Patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] comprises an immune-mediated group of chronic gastrointestinal disorders. Patients with IBD may experience extraintestinal manifestations, such as hepatobiliary complications. This meta-analysis aims to assess the prevalence of different hepatic manifestations in IBD patients.

METHODS

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched until July 20, 2022, by specifying keywords for IBD, hepatic manifestations, and study type. Full texts of cohort studies in English that examined the prevalence of different hepatic manifestations were included in this study. The primary outcome was the overall prevalence of hepatic manifestations in IBD patients. For the statistical analysis, a proportion by random effect model meta-analysis was performed. The registration number for the protocol of this study in PROSPERO is CRD42022369595.

RESULTS

From the 4421 articles retrieved from the primary search, 118 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. After a pooled analysis of 1 729 128 patients, the overall prevalence of hepatic manifestations was 3.49% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.31-3.68%; I2: 99.55%). The pooled prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in 228 216 patients was 26.1% [95% CI: 22.1-30.2%; I2: 99.018%]. After pooled analysis of 9642 patients, the prevalence of primary sclerosing cholangitis was 1.67% [95% CI: 1.47-1.88%; I2: 99.10%]. The pooled prevalence of biliary stones was 4.1% [95% CI: 3.6-4.7%; I2: 97.43%]. Autoimmune hepatitis (0.51% [95% CI: 0.26-0.75%]; I2: 85.36%) and portal vein thrombosis (0.21% [95% CI: 0.08-0.33%]; I2: 97.95%) are considered as rare manifestations.

CONCLUSION

This study summarizes the prevalence and importance of different hepatic manifestations in IBD patients. These findings are crucial for the management of extraintestinal manifestations, especially hepatic manifestations, in IBD patients.

Identifying inflammatory bowel disease patients at risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: usefulness of non-invasive steatosis predictive scores

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients have a higher risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) compared with the general population. However, it is not known whether available non-invasive hepatic steatosis scores are useful in predicting MAFLD in IBD patients. We aimed to analyze the performances of MAFLD screening score (MAFLD-S), Fatty Liver Index (FLI), Hepatic Steatosis Index (HSI) and Clinical Prediction Tool for NAFLD in Crohn's Disease (CPN-CD), in identifying MAFLD in IBD patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out including consecutive adult IBD outpatients submitted to transient elastography (TE). MAFLD criteria were assessed, and hepatic steatosis (HS) was defined by a controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) >248 dB/m using TE. MAFLD-S, FLI, HSI, and CPN-CD were calculated and their accuracy for the prediction of MAFLD was evaluated through their areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.

RESULTS

Of 168 patients, body mass index ≥25, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and arterial hypertension were present in 76 (45.2%), 10 (6.0%), 53 (31.5%), 20 (11.9%), respectively. HS was identified in 77 (45.8%) patients, of which 65 (84.4%) fulfilled MAFLD criteria. MAFLD-S (AUROC, 0.929 [95% CI, 0.888-0.971]) had outstanding and FLI (AUROC, 0.882 [95% CI, 0.830-0.934]), HSI (AUROC, 0.803 [95% CI, 0.736-0.871]), and CPN-CD (AUROC, 0.822 [95% CI, 0.753-0.890) had excellent discrimination in predicting MAFLD.

CONCLUSIONS

MAFLD-S, FLI, HSI and CPN-CD scores can accurately identify MAFLD in IBD patients, allowing the selection of those in whom hepatic steatosis and metabolic risk factors assessment may be particularly beneficial.

Steroid Use and Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

GOALS

We sought to evaluate the association of steroids with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

BACKGROUND

Patients with IBD are at increased risk of NAFLD. Steroids may have a role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD.

STUDY

We searched MEDLINE (through PubMed) and Embase for studies from inception to July 2021. We included published interventional and observational studies of adults 18 years or older with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. We reported odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and generated forest plots. A random effects model generated a summary effect estimate. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and Egger's test. Study quality was examined using modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).

RESULTS

A total of 12 observational studies with 3497 participants were included. NAFLD was identified in 1017 (29.1%) patients. The pooled odds ratio for the development of NAFLD in steroid users versus non-users was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.72-1.04). There was no significant heterogeneity between studies ( I ²=0.00%, P =0.13). No publication bias was detected by funnel plot or Egger's test ( P =0.24). Findings were consistent among subgroup analyses stratified by study quality.

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, steroids were not associated with NAFLD in patients with IBD. Steroids may not need to be withheld from patients with IBD for the purposes of preventing NAFLD. Additional prospective studies that systematically document steroid exposure and important confounders among patients with IBD are warranted.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury Used in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Therapeutic options for the management of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] have been expanding in recent decades. New biological and small molecule therapies have been incorporated into the pharmacological arsenal, allowing a more personalized management, and seeking increasingly strict remission goals. However, the fear of developing adverse events represents one of the most important limitations in deciding its use by patients and by a multidisciplinary team. Despite the risk of hepatotoxicity of thiopurines and methotrexate, these drugs are still used either as monotherapy or as combined therapy with anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] biological agents. Although drug-induced liver injury [DILI] appears to be less frequent with anti-TNF agents, newer biologics and small molecules, liver tests should be considered in the follow-up of these patients, especially regarding future combined therapy of biologics or of these drugs with small molecules. The objective of this review is to show data on the risk of developing DILI in patients with IBD who are undergoing treatment with traditional therapy or new drugs, whether biological or small molecules.

Meta-analysis: prevalence of, and risk factors for, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is found in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, uncertainties remain on the magnitude of the association.

AIMS

To explore systematically the prevalence of, and risk factors for, NAFLD in IBD patients.

METHODS

We searched medical literature using Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and ProQuest, from inception to September 30, 2021. We included observational studies reporting the prevalence of NAFLD in ≥50 adult patients with IBD. Diagnosis of NAFLD could be based on imaging, histopathology, and/or hepatic steatosis index. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, prior surgery (bowel resection), corticosteroids, biologics and immunomodulators were assessed as potential risk factors for NAFLD.

RESULTS

Of 1893 citations, 44 eligible studies were finally included, comprising 14 947 subjects from 18 different countries. Pooled prevalence of NAFLD was 30.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.5-34.9) in patients with IBD worldwide, which varied regionally. No significant difference was observed in the odds ratio (OR) of NAFLD among Crohn's disease (CD) patients compared with ulcerative colitis (UC) patients (1.16, 95% CI 0.93-1.44). Risk of NAFLD was almost twice as high in patients with IBD as in healthy subjects (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.13-3.41). Age (adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05) and BMI (adjusted OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.22-1.32) were statistically significantly associated with increased risk of NAFLD. The pooled prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis in IBD patients with NAFLD was 13.6% (95% CI 7.6-19.7) based on six studies.

CONCLUSION

Up to one-third of patients with IBD experienced NAFLD worldwide. The risk of NAFLD was two times higher in IBD patients versus healthy subjects.

Hepatobiliary manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease: A practical approach

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are associated with various hepatobiliary disorders. They can occur at any moment in the course of the disease or associated with the treatment. The prevalence of liver dysfunction can reach up to 50% in different studies. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is considered the most common hepatobiliary complication in IBD, while primary sclerosing cholangitis is the most specific. Management of hepatic manifestations in IBD involves a multidisciplinary approach that includes a high index of suspicion and joint management with hepatologists. The medical confrontation with abnormal liver tests must include an exhaustive study to determine if these patterns can be related to IBD, associated diseases or to the therapies used.

Effects of asparaginases and L-carnitine on Western-diet-induced hepatosteatosis in mice

Background: Asparaginases are common chemotherapeutic agents used for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia as a single or combinational therapy. Accompanying hepatotoxicity makes its use in elderly patients with pre-conditions, as obesity or other hepatopathies, difficult. Various hepatoprotective compounds like, L-carnitine, are discussed to ameliorate the induced hepatotoxicity. Methods: Here we aimed to establish a mouse model to study the effect of asparaginases (L-asparaginase and Oncaspar) and L-carnitine on Western-diet-induced hepatosteatosis in mice. Dose-escalation studies were performed to analyze asparaginases induced hepatotoxicity in C57BL/6 mice with normal or fatty livers. Subsequently, the effect of L-carnitine to improve the induced toxicity was tested. Results: Our results showed mild-to-moderate hepatotoxic effects while the Western-diet induced a higher degree of vacuolization and hepatocyte damage in liver tissue. Testing of L-carnitine in the established models did not show any protective effect on the toxicity or impairment of the efficacy of asparaginases. Conclusion: The here established models were able to demonstrate the asparaginase-induced hepatotoxic effects which were enhanced by the Western-diet. However, to test potential ameliorating drugs, the models might need some improvements.

Patients With IBD Receiving Methotrexate Are at Higher Risk of Liver Injury Compared With Patients With Non-IBD Diseases: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background: Methotrexate is well-known in treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (Ps), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Several reports have indicated a higher incidence of methotrexate (MTX)-related liver adverse events in patients with IBD. We aim to investigate the risk of liver injury in patients with IBD and those with non-IBD diseases treated with MTX.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles that reported liver adverse events in patients with IBD, RA, and Ps/PsA, receiving MTX therapy. Additional articles were obtained by screening the references of recent meta-analysis and reviews. Raw data from included articles were pooled to calculate the cumulative incidence of total liver injury (TLI), MTX discontinuation (MTX-D), and liver fibrosis (LF). RR (relative risk) was calculated to compare the difference between patients with IBD and those with non-IBD diseases.

Results: A total of 326 articles with 128,876 patients were included. The patients with IBD had higher incidence of TLI [11.2 vs. 9.2%; relative risk (RR) = 1.22; P = 0.224] and MTX-D (2.6 vs. 1.8%; RR, 1.48; P = 0.089) than patients with non-IBD diseases. Due to the publication bias, trim-and-fill was performed. Afterwards, the patients with IBD showed significantly higher risk of TLI (11.2 vs. 3%; RR = 3.76; p < 0.001), MTX-D (3.3 vs. 0.7%; RR = 5; p < 0.001) and LF (3.1 vs. 0.1%; RR = 38.62; P = 0.001) compared with patients with non-IBD diseases.

Conclusion: IBD is associated with a higher risk of MTX-related liver injury. The mechanism of MTX-induced hepatotoxicity might be different in IBD and non-IBD diseases, and needs to be verified in future research.

Liver involvement in inflammatory bowel disease: What should the clinician know?

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may show a wide range of extraintestinal manifestations. In this context, liver involvement is a focal point for both an adequate management of the disease and its prognosis, due to possible serious comorbidity. The association between IBD and primary sclerosing cholangitis is the most known example. This association is relevant because it implies an increased risk of both colorectal cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Additionally, drugs such as thiopurines or biologic agents can cause drug-induced liver damage; therefore, this event should be considered when planning IBD treatment. Additionally, particular consideration should be given to the evidence that IBD patients may have concomitant chronic viral hepatitis, such as hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Chronic immunosuppressive regimens may cause a hepatitis flare or reactivation of a healthy carrier state, therefore careful monitoring of these patients is necessary. Finally, the spread of obesity has involved even IBD patients, thus increasing the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, which has already proven to be more common in IBD patients than in the non-IBD population. This phenomenon is considered an emerging issue, as it will become the leading cause of liver cirrhosis.

Liver steatosis is a risk factor for hepatotoxicity in inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with azathioprine

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The literature demonstrates that hepatic steatosis reduces the tolerance of immunosuppression in people with inflammatory bowel disease. It also shows that elevated methylmercaptopurine may be responsible for thiopurine-induced hepatitis. This exploratory study investigates the relationship between hepatic steatosis, methylmercaptopurine and alanine transaminase.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients started on azathioprine treatment at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust between 2014 and 2017. There were 600 patients in total. Ninety-one patients met our inclusion criteria which were at least one ultrasound scan commenting on the appearance of the liver, liver function tests at commencement of azathioprine and liver function tests and a methylmercaptopurine level between 6 and 8 weeks after starting treatment.

RESULTS

Of 91 patients included in our study, 32 patients (32%) were identified as having radiological hepatic steatosis on ultrasound imaging and 59 patients had no evidence of steatosis. We found a positive association between methylmercaptopurine levels and change in alanine transaminase in patients with hepatic steatosis (P < 0.001) but not in those with a normal liver on ultrasound imaging.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the higher levels of methylmercaptopurine may be a risk factor for hepatitis in patients with hepatic steatosis but not in those with a normal liver.

Prevalence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a significant public health burden, with up to 30% of the US population affected. The prevalence of NAFLD among inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is unknown. Understanding risk factors for NAFLD in IBD patients has implications in the treatment of these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of NAFLD among IBD patients and to identify risk factors associated with NAFLD development.

METHODS

Embase and MEDLINE databases were searched using Medical Subject Headlines to find studies that assessed the prevalence of NAFLD among IBD patients. Twenty-seven English-language research abstracts/articles were identified between January 2005 and April 2018. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Prevalence of NAFLD among IBD patients was compared with prevalence of NAFLD in the general population.

RESULTS

Based on data pooled from all 27 studies, the prevalence of NAFLD among IBD patients was 32% (95% CI, 24%-40%) with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 98%). The prevalence of NAFLD among IBD patients (32%) is statistically significantly higher than the prevalence of NAFLD in the general population (25.2%; P < 0.001). Factors associated with the development of NAFLD among IBD patients included age, BMI, diabetes, IBD duration, and prior history of bowel resection.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a higher prevalence of NAFLD among IBD patients compared with the general population. Previous treatment regimens may be a risk factor for the development of NAFLD. Future studies are needed to further clarify these risk factors and determine screening recommendations.

Hepatotoxicty of Agents Used in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a 2020 Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As treatment options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continue to expand, the opportunity for hepatotoxicity remains a clinical concern. This review looks to update the current literature on drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and liver-related complications from current and emerging treatments for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

RECENT FINDINGS

An extensive literature review on currently used medications to treat IBD and their liver-related side effects that includes mesalamine, thiopurines, certain antibiotics, methotrexate, anti-TNF agents including recently introduced biosimilars, anti-integrin therapy, anti-IL 12/IL 23 therapy, and small molecule JAK inhibitors. Hepatotoxicity remains an important clinical issue when managing patients with IBD. Clinicians need to remain aware of the potential for liver-related adverse events with various medication classes and adjust their clinical monitoring as appropriate based on the agents being used.

Frequent Offenders and Patterns of Injury

Given the liver's role in drug metabolism, it is uniquely sensitive to potential drug-induced liver injury (DILI) despite inherent protective mechanisms. In this article, we focus on the most common causes of DILI and their patterns of injury. Although not comprehensive, we attempt to cover several classes of commonly used drugs, and their associated patterns of injury and management.

Systematic Review With Meta-analysis: Epidemiology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasingly identified in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but there are few systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the studies of NAFLD in IBD patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched (until August 2018) to identify observational studies that reported the prevalence and risk factors for NAFLD in IBD patients. Pooled prevalence, odds ratios (OR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Study quality was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Of the 662 citations evaluated, 19 studies (including 5620 subjects) reported the prevalence of NAFLD in IBD population and were included for the analysis. The overall pooled prevalence was 27.5% (95% CI, 20.7%-34.2%). The prevalence was higher in older patients (MD = 8.22; 95% CI, 6.22-10.22), type 2 diabetes (OR = 3.85; 95% CI, 2.49-5.95), hypertension (OR = 3.18; 95% CI, 2.36-4.28), obesity (OR = 2.79; 95% CI, 1.73-4.50), insulin resistance (OR = 6.66; 95% CI, 1.28-34.77), metabolic syndrome (OR = 4.96; 95% CI, 3.05-8.05), chronic kidney disease (OR = 4.83; 95% CI, 1.79-13.04), methotrexate use (OR = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.02-3.06), surgery for IBD (OR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02-1.62), and longer duration of IBD (MD = 5.60; 95% CI, 2.24-8.97).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that NAFLD was not uncommon in the IBD population. Older age, metabolic risk factors, methotrexate use, prior surgery, and longer duration of IBD are predictors for the presence of NAFLD in IBD. Screening of NAFLD might be recommended among IBD patients with the aforementioned factors.

Hepatic steatosis and patients with inflammatory bowel disease: when transient elastography makes the difference

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest an increased prevalence of hepatic steatosis (HS) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Features such as chronic inflammation, previous surgeries, drug-induced hepatotoxicity, malnutrition, and intestinal dysbiosis seem to be involved in its pathogenesis.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of HS in patients with IBD quantified by controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and by clinical-analytical scores: Hepatic Steatosis Index (HSI) and Fatty Liver Index (FLI). The secondary aim was to investigate risk factors associated with HS in patients with IBD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out including consecutive outpatients observed in our department between January and March 2017. HS was defined as HSI of at least 36 or FLI of at least 60 or CAP of greater than 248.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients were included, with a mean age of 40.6±12.8 years. There were 86 (53.4%) female patients. Overall, 62.7% had Crohn's disease and 37.1% had ulcerative colitis. Moreover, 73 (45.3%) patients had CAP greater than 248, 27 (16.8%) had FLI greater than 60, and 46 (28.6%) had HSI greater than 36.We found that patients with CAP of greater than 248 were more frequently obese (28.8 vs. 0.0% P<0.001), male (57.5 vs. 37.5% P=0.011), and presented more frequently with metabolic syndrome (23.9 vs. 4.5% P <0.001). With regard to IBD factors, patients with HS had a higher frequency of previous surgeries (31.5 vs. 12.5% P=0.003). In multivariate analysis, only male sex [odds ratio: 5.7 (95% confidence interval: 2.0-15.9); P=0.001] and previous surgeries [odds ratio: 5.9 (95% confidence interval: 1.5-22.9); P=0.011] were independent risk factors of HS.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, the frequency of HS varied between 16.8 and 45.3% defined by noninvasive methods. We found that male sex and previous history of surgery were the independent risk factors of HS when quantified by transient elastography.

Immunosuppressive therapies adversely affect blood biochemical parameters in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis

Objective

This study was performed to investigate whether a definite correlation exists between alteration of blood biochemical parameters and immunosuppressive therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Data on alterations in white blood cells, platelets, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, and liver enzymes in patients with IBD treated with immunomodulators were extracted.

Results

Data from 1141 patients were included. The relative risk (RR) of leukopenia was significantly higher in the immunosuppressive therapies group than in the placebo group (RR, 12.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.28–31.57). A statistically significant risk of leukocytosis during immunosuppressive therapies was observed (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.05–2.23). Patients taking immunomodulators had increased risks of serum creatinine elevation (RR, 10.68; 95% CI, 2.07–55.12) and serum aminotransferase elevation (RR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.24–8.17).

Conclusion

Immunosuppressive therapies might have an impact on variations in blood biochemical parameters in patients with IBD. Although the conclusion regarding leukopenia was reliable in this study, some confounding factors might reduce the reliability of the conclusions about leukocytosis, creatinine elevation, and aminotransferase elevation. Close monitoring is recommended during immunosuppressive therapies for IBD.

The diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an uncommon but important cause of liver disease that can arise after exposure to a multitude of drugs and herbal and dietary supplements. The severity of idiosyncratic DILI varies from mild serum aminotransferase elevations to the development of severe liver injury that can progress to acute liver failure resulting in death or liver transplantation within days of DILI onset. Chronic liver injury that persists for more than 6 months after DILI onset is also becoming increasingly recognized in up to 20% of DILI patients. Host demographic (age, gender, race), clinical and laboratory features at DILI onset have been associated with the severity and outcome of liver injury in DILI patients. In addition to cessation of the suspect drug, other medical interventions including the use of N-acetylcysteine and corticosteroids in selected patients have shown some clinical benefit, but additional prospective studies are needed. A number of promising diagnostic, prognostic and mechanistic serum and genetic biomarkers may help improve our understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of idiosyncratic DILI.

Effects of inflammatory bowel disease treatment on the risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies have demonstrated an association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and an increased risk for the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the risk of NAFLD in IBD patients who receive different medical treatments including glucocorticoids, immunomodulators, and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors remains unclear. We aimed to assess whether the use of certain IBD medications is associated with the development of NAFLD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was carried out in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception through October 2017 to identify studies that assessed the association between the use of IBD medications and the risk of developing NAFLD. Effect estimates from the individual study were derived and combined using random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.

RESULTS

Seven observational studies with a total of 1610 patients were enrolled. There was no significant association between the use of IBD medications and the incidence of NAFLD. The pooled odds ratios of NAFLD in patients who use biological agents, immunomodulators, methotrexate, and steroids were 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-1.46], 1.19 (95% CI: 0.70-2.01), 3.62 (95% CI: 0.48-27.39), and 1.24 (95% CI: 0.85-1.82), respectively. Egger's regression asymmetry test was performed and showed no publication bias.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates no significant association between medications used in the treatment of IBD and the risk of developing NAFLD. The findings of our study suggest a complex, multifactorial relationship between IBD and the development of NAFLD beyond the scope of current pharmacological intervention.

Evaluation of interleukin-6 and its soluble receptor components sIL-6R and sgp130 as markers of inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases

PURPOSE

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) production and signalling are increased in the inflamed mucosa in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). As published serum levels of IL-6 and its soluble receptors sIL-6R and sgp130 in IBD are from small cohorts and partly contradictory, we systematically evaluated IL-6, sIL-6R and sgp130 levels as markers of disease activity in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

Consecutive adult outpatients with confirmed CD or UC were included, and their disease activity and medication were monitored. Serum from 212 CD patients (815 measurements) and 166 UC patients (514 measurements) was analysed, and 100 age-matched healthy blood donors were used as controls.

RESULTS

IL-6 serum levels were significantly elevated in active versus inactive CD and UC, also compared with healthy controls. However, only a fraction of IBD patients showed increased serum IL-6. IL-6 levels ranged up to 32.7 ng/mL in active CD (> 5000-fold higher than in controls), but also up to 6.9 ng/mL in inactive CD. Increases in active UC (up to 195 pg/mL) and inactive UC (up to 27 pg/mL) were less pronounced. Associations between IL-6 serum levels and C-reactive protein concentrations as well as leukocyte and thrombocyte counts were observed. Median sIL-6R and sgp130 levels were only increased by up to 15%, which was considered of no diagnostic significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a minority of IBD patients shows elevated IL-6 serum levels. However, in these patients, IL-6 is strongly associated with disease activity. Its soluble receptors sIL-6R and sgp130 do not appear useful as biomarkers in IBD.

Drug-induced liver injury in inflammatory bowel disease: 1-year prospective observational study

AIM

To analyze 1-year liver injury burden in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.

METHODS

During a 6-mo inclusion period, consecutive IBD cases having a control visit at IBD center were included. Basic demographics, IBD phenotype and IBD treatment were recorded on entry. Aminotransferase (AT) activities of ALT, AST, ALP and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) were measured at baseline, 3 mo prior to study entry and prospectively every 3 mo for 1 year. Liver injury patterns were predefined as: Grade 1 in ALT 1-3 × upper limit of normal (ULN), grade 2 in ALT > 3 × ULN, hepatocellular injury in ALT > 2 × ULN, cholestatic injury in simultaneous GGT and ALP elevation > ULN. Persisting injury was reported when AT elevations were found on > 1 measurement. Risk factors for the patterns of liver injury were identified among demographic parameters, disease phenotype and IBD treatment in univariate and multivariate analysis. Finally, implications for the change in IBD management were evaluated in cases with persisting hepatocellular or cholestatic injury.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-one patients were included having 917 ALT and 895 ALP and GGT measurements. Over one year, grade 1 injury was found in 66 (26.3%), grade 2 in 5 (2%) and hepatocellular injury in 16 patients (6.4%). Persisting hepatocellular injury was found in 4 cases. Cholestasis appeared in 11 cases (4.4%) and persisted throughout the entire study period in 1 case. In multivariate analysis, hepatocellular injury was associated with BMI (OR = 1.13, 1.02-1.26), liver steatosis (OR = 10.61, 2.22-50.7), IBD duration (1.07, 1.00-1.15) and solo infliximab (OR = 4.57, 1.33-15.7). Cholestatic liver injury was associated with prior intestinal resection (OR = 32.7, 3.18-335), higher CRP (OR = 1.04, 1.00-1.08) and solo azathioprine (OR = 10.27, 1.46-72.3). In one case with transient hepatocellular injury azathioprine dose was decreased. In 4 cases with persisting hepatocellular injury, fatty liver or alcohol were most likely causes and IBD treatment was pursued without change. In the case with persisting cholestatic injury, no signs of portal hypertension were identified and treatment with infliximab continued.

CONCLUSION

Liver injury was frequent, mostly transient and rarely changed management. Infliximab or azathioprine were confirmed as its risk factors indicating the need for regular AT monitoring.

Hepatic complications induced by immunosuppressants and biologics in inflammatory bowel disease

The incidence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is rising worldwide. The therapeutic options for IBD are expanding, and the number of drugs with new targets will rapidly increase in coming years. A rapid step-up approach with close monitoring of intestinal inflammation is extensively used. The fear of side effects represents one the most limiting factor of their use. Despite a widespread use for years, drug induced liver injury (DILI) management remains a challenging situation with Azathioprine and Methotrexate. DILI seems less frequent with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and new biologic therapies. The aim of this review is to report incidence, physiopathology and practical guidelines in case of DILI occurrence with the armamentarium of old and new drugs in the field of IBD.