The clinical usefulness of elastography in the evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients: A biopsy-controlled study

Emerging Diagnostics and Therapeutics for Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

The obesity epidemic has pushed fatty liver disease, which consists of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, to the forefront of the 21st century. Disease identification can be done invasively with a liver biopsy or noninvasively through elastography and measurements of biomarkers, such as the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) liver enzymes. Presently, there are no FDA-approved drugs on the market to treat the disease. Alternative medicinal treatments have been investigated, which include altering the intestinal microbiota and consuming anti-inflammatory, herbal-based, vitamin-based, and plant-based medications, in addition to following a healthy lifestyle. In this study, multiple databases were used to identify articles pertaining to fatty liver disease (FLD). Databases included Biomedical Reference Collection: Comprehensive, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Google Scholar, and PubMed. All articles gathered from the databases were peer-reviewed and less than 10 years old to ensure the credibility of the work and recent information regarding the disease. A total of 13 articles were used to gather information for this review. All articles were confirmed to be peer-reviewed by checking them with Ulrich's web. In all 13 peer-reviewed articles, the diagnosis of FLD was most commonly done by analyzing ALT and AST liver enzymes and lipid profiles. Liver ultrasound, liver FibroScan, and liver biopsy served as other tools used for detecting the presence of FLD. It was observed that anti-inflammatory, herbal-based, vitamin-based, and plant-based medications and healthy gut microbiota had beneficial and therapeutic effects in treating FLD when coupled with healthy lifestyle changes. All medicinal treatments were found to lower the ALT and AST liver enzymes, lipid profiles (total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein), and liver steatosis scores in studies where ultrasound was used before and after treatment. Further investigation is needed to fully understand the mechanisms behind the therapeutic effects of treating FLD; however, the medicinal treatments discussed in this review show promising prospects for treating the disease. The therapeutic effects of anti-inflammatory, herbal-based, vitamin-based, and plant-based medications and living a healthy lifestyle were seen in lower levels of liver enzymes, improved lipid profiles, and lower steatosis scores, with no reported side effects on subjects. The treatment options studied may have beneficial impacts in treating FLD patients and may be used in the development of future medications to combat the disease.

The prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and its association on adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus

AIMS

To determine the prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and its association on adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

METHODS

380 women with GDM had a FibroScan® performed between 24 and 32 weeks. A Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) ≥ 233.5 dB/m signified MAFLD. Gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia and eclampsia contributed to a composite of adverse maternal outcomes. A composite of adverse neonatal outcomes included pre-term birth, hypoglycaemia, small/large-for-gestational age and admission to neonatal high dependency. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine independent associations with MAFLD.

RESULTS

147 (38.7 %) women had MAFLD. Higher pre-pregnancy BMI (median 28.4, IQR 24.7-33.0 kg/m2 vs median 24.0, IQR 21.7-26.5 kg/m2, p < 0.01) and rates of insulin therapy (62.2 % vs 40.7 %, p < 0.01) occurred in MAFLD over non-MAFLD women. MAFLD was independently associated with obesity (aOR 4.73 [95 % CI 2.53-8.86]) and insulin therapy (aOR 1.79 [95 % CI 1.12-2.85]). MAFLD and non-MAFLD women had comparable rates of adverse maternal (7.7 % vs 9.5 %, p = 0.56) and neonatal outcomes (75.4 % vs 68.8 %, p = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Within this GDM cohort, almost 40% had FibroScan®-detected MAFLD in mid-to-late gestation. MAFLD was not associated with worse pregnancy outcomes.

Accuracy of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for assessing steatosis and fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common chronic liver disease, and among the non-invasive tests, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) have shown better diagnostic performance in NAFLD. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of CAP and LSM for assessing steatosis and fibrosis in NAFLD.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for relevant articles published up to February 13^th, 2022, and selected studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and evaluated the quality of evidence. Then we pooled sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. A random effect model was applied regardless of heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis and subgroup analysis were performed to explore heterogeneity, and Fagan plot analysis was used to evaluate clinical utility. This meta-analysis was completed in Nanjing, Jiangsu and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022309965).

FINDINGS

A total of 10537 patients from 61 studies were included in our meta-analysis. The AUROC of CAP were 0·924, 0·794 and 0·778 for steatosis grades ≥ S1, ≥ S2 and = S3, respectively, and the AUROC of LSM for detecting fibrosis stages ≥ F1, ≥ F2, ≥ F3, and = F4 were 0·851, 0·830, 0·897 and 0·925, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² had lower accuracy for diagnosing S ≥ S1, ≥ S2 than BMI<30 kg/m². For the mean cut-off values, significant differences were found in CAP values among different body mass index (BMI) populations and LSM values among different regions. For diagnosing S ≥ S1, ≥ S2 and = S3, the mean CAP cut-off values for BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² were 30·7, 28·2, and 27·9 dB/m higher than for BMI < 30 kg/m² (P = 0·001, 0·001 and 0·018, respectively). For diagnosing F ≥ F2 and = F4, the mean cut-off values of Europe and America were 0·96 and 2·03 kPa higher than Asia (P = 0·027, P = 0·034), respectively. In addition, the results did not change significantly after sensitivity analysis and the trim and fill method to correct for publication bias, proving that the conclusions are robust.

INTERPRETATION

The good performance of CAP and LSM for the diagnosis of mild steatosis (S ≥ S1), advanced liver fibrosis (F ≥ F3), and cirrhosis (F = F4) can be used to screen for NAFLD in high-risk populations. Of note, the accuracy of CAP for the detection of steatosis in patients with obesity is reduced and requires specific diagnostic values. For LSM, the same diagnostic values can be used when the appropriate probes are selected based on BMI and the automated probe selection tool. The performance of CAP and LSM in assessing steatosis in patients with obesity, moderate to severe steatosis, and low-grade fibrosis should be further validated and improved in the future.

FUNDING

The study was funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in women diagnosed with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To further explore the relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by determining the prevalence of GDM in women diagnosed with NAFLD antepartum.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched using specific keywords. Original studies of adult women reporting NAFLD (confirmed on imaging) and GDM (confirmed via oral glucose tolerance test) prevalence were included. Studies involving women with pre-gestational pre-diabetes, type 1/type 2 diabetes, chronic liver disease/cirrhosis unrelated to NAFLD were excluded. The prevalence of GDM occurring in women with NAFLD was calculated along with pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random effects model.

RESULTS

Seven studies (total 2299 participants) were included. The prevalence of GDM in women with NAFLD was 26.0% (95% CI 20.9-31.7%, I² = 48%, τ² = 0.06). The odds of having GDM were 2.9 times higher in pregnant women diagnosed with NAFLD compared with non-NAFLD women, although a high degree of heterogeneity existed (unadjusted OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.0-8.4, I² = 81%, τ² = 0.83, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study provides further insight into the prevalence of GDM in pregnant women diagnosed with NAFLD. There is a current lack of well-conducted studies examining this complex association between NAFLD and GDM.

Diagnostic Accuracy of FibroScan and Factors Affecting Measurements

Evaluating liver steatosis and fibrosis is important for patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Although liver biopsy and pathological assessment is the gold standard for these conditions, this technique has several disadvantages. The evaluation of steatosis and fibrosis using ultrasound B-mode imaging is qualitative and subjective. The liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) determined using FibroScan are the evidence-based non-invasive measures of liver fibrosis and steatosis, respectively. The LSM and CAP measurements are carried out simultaneously, and the median values of more than ten valid measurements are used to quantify liver fibrosis and steatosis. Here, we demonstrate that the reliability of the LSM depends on the interquartile range to median ratio (IQR/Med), but CAP values do not depend on IQR/Med. In addition, the LSM is affected by inflammation, congestion, and cholestasis in addition to fibrosis, while CAP values are affected by the body mass index in addition to steatosis. We also show that the M probe provides higher LSM values but lower CAP values than the XL probe in the same population. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the diagnostic accuracies of the two probes. These findings are important to understand the reliability of FibroScan measurements and the factors influencing measurement values for all patients.

Serum cytokeratin-18 and its relation to liver fibrosis and steatosis diagnosed by FibroScan and controlled attenuation parameter in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatitis C virus patients

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has emerged as the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Multiple diagnostic noninvasive methods for NAFLD were studied (both serological and imaging), either single or combined. Attention has been focused on cytokeratin-18 (CK18) as a novel serological marker for the diagnosis of steatosis/fibrosis in NAFLD and hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate serum CK18 in NAFLD and HCV fibrosis/steatosis and also to correlate its performance with the diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography (TE) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) in the diagnosis of fibrosis/steatosis in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three equal groups of participants were enrolled (n=135): group I included patients with chronic HCV, group II included NAFLD patients, and group III included control participants. For all groups, TE/CAP and labs including serum CK18 were performed. Liver biopsy was performed for the NAFLD group.

RESULTS

Serum CK18 was significantly higher in the NAFLD group (19.01±3.49 ng/ml) versus the HCV group (8.95±1.06 ng/ml) and the control group (4.83±1.6 ng/ml) (P<0.001). The CK18 levels in biopsy stages (steatosis, ballooning, inflammation, and fibrosis) and FibroScan/CAP degrees showed that CK18 increased significantly with steatosis and fibrosis stages (biopsy or FibroScan/CAP), but did not reach significance with ballooning or inflammation grades. CK18 was significantly different in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis versus non-nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients (P=0.041). The best CK18 cutoff to detect steatosis (S≥2) in NAFLD and HCV was 11.65 and 6.84 ng/ml, respectively with an overall sensitivity and specificity over 97%. The CK18 cutoff for significant fibrosis (F≥2) by FibroScan in the NAFLD/HCV groups was 9.115 ng/ml, with 62.5%/69.2% sensitivity/specificity (P=0.031). However, inflammation had a cutoff with a marginal P value (P=0.080), and a reliable cutoff for ballooning was not attained (P=0.386). There was a positive correlation between CK18 and fibrosis (by FibroScan) in the NAFLD and HCV groups (P<0.05). The correlation between CK18 and steatosis in CAP and the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score was very good (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Serum CK18 is related strongly to the development/progression of NAFLD and HCV-related fibrosis/steatosis. TE was correlated highly with liver biopsy results. The combination of CK18 with other noninvasive modalities increases the diagnostic yield of these tests.