Clinical phenotype and mortality in patients with idiopathic small bowel villous atrophy: a dual-centre international study

Flow cytometry for the assessment and monitoring of aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes in non-responsive celiac disease and non-celiac enteropathies

BACKGROUND

Few data are available on flow cytometry (FC) for monitoring intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) in refractory celiac disease (RCD), non-responsive celiac disease (NRCD), and non-celiac enteropathies (NCEs).

AIMS

1) To investigate the significance of monitoring IELs immunophenotype with FC in patients with NRCD, RCD and NCEs; 2) to evaluate FC concordance with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and γ-TCR clonality analysis.

METHODS

Patients investigated between January-2012 and February-2023 were divided into two groups: 1)confirmed RCD or NRCD being investigated for persistent symptoms and suspected complications of celiac disease (CD); 2)NCEs lacking clinical/histological response. Clinical/molecular features and outcomes were retrospectively collected and analysed according to presence/absence of aberrant IELs on FC (cut-off≥20 % CD103+sCD3-CD8-iCD3+ IELs).

RESULTS

52 patients (18 RCD,21 NRCD,13 NCEs; 38F, 55±13 years; median follow-up 30 months, IQR 2-58) underwent 100 FC IELs determinations. 22/52 had ≥2 FC determinations and IEL phenotype remained unchanged over time in all them (κ=1.00). Aberrant IEL phenotype in CD was associated with increased mortality (HR 4.2, 95 % CI 1.5-11.9, p < 0.01). No patients with NCEs had an aberrant IEL phenotype at FC, although 3/13 developed lymphoma and 4/13 died. Concordance of FC was fair with both IHC (κ=0.40) and γ-TCR clonality analysis (κ=0.22).

CONCLUSION

FC is accurate for assessing and monitoring IEL phenotype and providing important prognostic information in celiac patients. Further study is needed on its role in NCEs.

Localised intestinal Kaposi sarcoma in a patient with non-coeliac seronegative villous atrophy

Seronegative villous atrophy (SNVA) is a diagnostic challenge for gastroenterologists, which is defined by villous atrophy and negative coeliac serology. Non-coeliac forms of SNVA, such as autoimmune enteropathy, can be life-threatening leading to intractable diarrhoea and severe malabsorption that require systemic immunosuppression. When all known causes have been excluded, it is termed idiopathic villous atrophy (IVA). We present a case of non-coeliac SNVA complicated by Kaposi sarcoma (KS). A previously well HIV-negative man in his 30s presented with a 4-month history of watery diarrhoea and 25 kg weight loss. After prolonged investigation, he was diagnosed with non-coeliac SNVA without an identified aetiology that would be consistent with IVA. Clinical recovery was achieved with parenteral nutrition for type II intestinal failure and immunosuppression using high-dose corticosteroids. On subsequent gastroscopy, he was diagnosed with localised intestinal KS prompting cessation of all immunosuppression but remained in clinical remission.

DQA1*0102 DQB1*0602 haplotype distinguishes coeliac disease and its complications from gluten unrelated enteropathies

BACKGROUND

Duodenal villous atrophy is due not only to coeliac disease and its complications but also to other rare enteropathies unrelated to gluten consumption, defined as noncoeliac enteropathies. The diagnosis of noncoeliac enteropathies remains challenging, and HLA typing has been widely used to exclude coeliac disease if DQ2 and DQ8 alleles are absent. However, the frequency of the various HLA alleles in noncoeliac enteropathies is still unknown.

AIMS

To describe the HLA genetic profile of patients affected by noncoeliac enteropathies who have been evaluated at our centres between 2000 and 2021, and to investigate the diagnostic role of HLA typing.

METHODS

Genomic DNA was collected from 44 Italian and 19 British adult patients with noncoeliac enteropathies. Patient genotypes were compared with those of healthy Italian and British populations obtained from HLA bone marrow donors' banks. In addition, genotypes were also compared with those of patients with coeliac disease and complicated coeliac disease.

RESULTS

Both in the Italian and in the British group, the DQA1*0102 DQB1*0602 haplotype and related alleles occurred significantly more frequently in patients with noncoeliac enteropathies compared to coeliac disease and complicated coeliac disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Together with negative HLA-DQ2 and DQ8 haplotypes, the DQA1*0102 DQB1*0602 haplotype can be used to guide the differential diagnosis between coeliac disease and noncoeliac enteropathies.

Nomenclature and diagnosis of seronegative coeliac disease and chronic non-coeliac enteropathies in adults: the Paris consensus

OBJECTIVE

Differential diagnosis of villous atrophy (VA) without coeliac antibodies in adults includes seronegative coeliac disease (CD) and chronic enteropathies unrelated to gluten, ie. non-coeliac enteropathies (NCEs). There is currently no international consensus on the nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for these enteropathies. In this work, a Delphi process was conducted to address this diagnostic and clinical uncertainty.

DESIGN

An international task force of 13 gastroenterologists from six countries was recruited at the 16th International Coeliac Disease Symposium, Paris, 2019. Between September 2019 and July 2021, a Delphi process was conducted through mail surveys to reach a consensus on which conditions to consider in the differential diagnosis of VA with negative coeliac serology and the clinical diagnostic approaches required for these conditions. A 70% agreement threshold was adopted.

RESULTS

Chronic enteropathies characterised by VA and negative coeliac serology can be attributed to two main clinical scenarios: forms of CD presenting with negative serology, which also include seronegative CD and CD associated with IgA deficiency, and NCEs, with the latter recognising different underlying aetiologies. A consensus was reached on the diagnostic criteria for NCEs assisting clinicians in differentiating NCEs from seronegative CD. Although in adults seronegative CD is the most common aetiology in patients with VA and negative serology, discriminating between seronegative CD and NCEs is key to avoid unnecessary lifelong gluten-free diet, treat disease-specific morbidity and contrast poor long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This paper describes the Paris consensus on the definitions and diagnostic criteria for seronegative CD and chronic NCEs in adults.

Seronegative autoimmune diseases: A challenging diagnosis

Autoimmune diseases (AID) are increasingly prevalent conditions which comprise more than 100 distinct clinical entities that are responsible for a great disease burden worldwide. The early recognition of these diseases is key for preventing their complications and for tailoring proper management. In most cases, autoantibodies, regardless of their potential pathogenetic role, can be detected in the serum of patients with AID, helping clinicians in making a definitive diagnosis and allowing screening strategies for early -and sometimes pre-clinical- diagnosis. Despite their undoubted crucial role, in a minority of cases, patients with AID may not show any autoantibody, a condition that is referred to as seronegative AID. Suboptimal accuracy of the available laboratory tests, antibody absorption, immunosuppressive therapy, immunodeficiencies, antigen exhaustion, and immunosenescence are the main possible determinants of seronegative AID. Indeed, in seronegative AID, the diagnosis is more challenging and must rely on clinical features and on other available tests, often including histopathological evaluation and radiological diagnostic tests. In this review, we critically dissect, in a narrative fashion, the possible causes of seronegativity, as well as the diagnostic and management implications, in several AID including autoimmune gastritis, celiac disease, autoimmune liver disease, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune encephalitis, myasthenia gravis, Sjögren's syndrome, antiphospholipid syndrome, and autoimmune thyroid diseases.

Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues

Objective

The differential diagnosis and management of seronegative enteropathies is challenging due to the rarity of these conditions, the overlap of clinical and histopathological features and the current lack of an international consensus on their nomenclature.

Design

This is a narrative review providing pragmatic guide on the investigation and clinical management of seronegative enteropathies in adults based on the available literature and our clinical experience.

Conclusions

Seronegative coeliac disease is the most frequent cause among the heterogeneous group of seronegative enteropathies and its diagnosis is confirmed by the clinical and histological response to a gluten-free diet after the exclusion of other causes of villous atrophy. Correct identification and targeted management of seronegative enteropathies is mandatory because of the variation in terms of clinical outcomes and prognosis.

Clinical classification and long-term outcomes of seronegative coeliac disease: a 20-year multicentre follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Seronegative coeliac disease is poorly defined.

AIMS

To study clinical phenotypes and long-term outcomes of seronegative coeliac disease in a multicentre cohort over 20 years.

METHODS

Seronegative coeliac disease was diagnosed in HLA-DQ2/DQ8-positive patients with villous atrophy (VA), negative IgA endomysial (EmA), tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and deamidated-gliadin antibodies (DGP), clinical and histological response to a gluten-free diet (GFD), and no alternative causes for VA. In patients with IgA deficiency, coeliac disease was diagnosed through VA, positive IgG EmA/tTG/DGP and clinical/histological response to a GFD (coeliac disease+IgAd). Patients with seropositive coeliac disease served as controls.

RESULTS

Of 227 patients previously diagnosed with seronegative coeliac disease, true seronegative coeliac disease was confirmed in 84, coeliac disease+IgAd in 48, and excluded in 55. Lack of follow-up duodenal biopsy precluded diagnosing seronegative coeliac disease in 40 patients. 2084 patients with seropositive coeliac disease served as controls. True seronegative coeliac disease had more severe symptoms at diagnosis and a higher risk of complications (HR 10.87, 95% CI 6.11-19.33, P < 0.001) and mortality (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.12-4.26, P < 0.01) than seropositive coeliac disease. There were no differences between true seronegative coeliac disease and coeliac disease+IgAd. On multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis, lack of clinical response to a GFD, true seronegative coeliac disease, coeliac disease+IgAd, and classical presentation predicted complications. Age at diagnosis, complications and absence of clinical response to a GFD predicted mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Seronegative coeliac disease has a more aggressive disease phenotype than seropositive coeliac disease. These data argue against over-reliance on serology for the diagnosis of coeliac disease and support a strict clinical and histologic follow-up in seronegative coeliac disease.

Celiac disease: histology-differential diagnosis-complications. A practical approach

Celiac disease is a multi-factorial chronic inflammatory intestinal disease, characterized by malabsorption resulting from mucosal injury after ingestion of wheat gluten or related rye and barley proteins. Inappropriate T-cell-mediated immune response against ingested gluten in genetically predisposed people, leads to characteristic histological lesions, as villous atrophy and intraepithelial lymphocytosis. Nevertheless, celiac disease is a comprehensive diagnosis with clinical, serological and genetic characteristics integrated with histological features. Biopsy of duodenal mucosa remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of celiac disease with the recognition of the spectrum of histological changes and classification of mucosa damage based on updated Corazza-Villanacci system. Appropriate differential diagnosis evaluation and clinical context also for the diagnosis of complications is, moreover, needed for correct histological features interpretation and clinical management.

Diagnostic and therapeutic challenge of unclassifiable enteropathies with increased intraepithelial CD103+ CD8+ T lymphocytes: a single center case series

OBJECTIVES

Chronic diarrhea, villous atrophy and/or increased intraepithelial T-lymphocytes (IEL) occur in many inflammatory disorders including celiac disease (CD). However, a definite diagnosis is difficult to make in some patients despite an extensive diagnostic work-up. Clinical outcomes and histological phenotypes of such patients we refer to as unclassifiable enteropathy (UEP) remain unclear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of patients with chronic diarrhea, weight loss and increased IEL. Patients with defined etiologies including infections, CD, drugs, immunodeficiencies or neoplasms were excluded. Clinical and histologic/immunophenotypic parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

Nine patients with UEP were identified. Small intestinal damage ranged from minor villous abnormalities to complete atrophy while all patients displayed high numbers of CD103⁺ CD8⁺ IELs. In contrast to CD, these CD8⁺ T cells were not confined to the surface epithelium, but also infiltrated the crypts. Additional histological features included apoptotic crypt epithelial cells and mixed inflammatory infiltrates in the tunica propria. Involvement of other segments of the gastrointestinal tract was observed in 7/9 patients. A clonal intestinal T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder developed in 2 patients, one of which had a fatal disease course. The majority of patients responded to corticosteroids, while response to immunosuppressive medications yielded heterogeneous results.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a patient population with 'difficult-to-classify' enteropathies characterized by various degrees of villous atrophy and strongly increased intraepithelial CD103⁺ CD8⁺ T cells in the small intestine which harbor an increased risk for T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Clinical course, histology, and response to immunosuppressive therapy all suggest an autoimmune pathogenesis.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Evaluation and Management of Seronegative Enteropathies: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

Our aim was to provide a consensus statement for the best approaches for diagnosis and management of patients with suspected enteropathy, but negative results from serologic tests for celiac disease (seronegative enteropathy).

METHODS

We collected findings from published cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies of diagnosis and case series and descriptive studies of management of patients believed to have celiac disease or other enteropathies unrelated to gluten, but negative results from serologic tests. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Review histologic findings with experienced pathologists who specialize in gastroenterology. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Serologic tests are essential for an accurate diagnosis of celiac disease. For patients with suspected celiac disease but negative results from serologic tests, total IgA level should be measured; patients should also be tested for anti-tissue transglutaminase, IgA against deamidated gliadin peptide, and endomysial antibody (IgA). Patients with total IgA levels below the lower limit of detection and IgG against tissue transglutaminase or deamidated gliadin peptide, or endomysial antibody, should be considered to have celiac disease with selective IgA deficiency rather than seronegative celiac disease. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Patients' diets should be carefully reviewed and duodenal biopsies should be collected and analyzed at the time of serologic testing to determine exposure to gluten and accuracy of test results. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Thorough medication histories should be collected from patients, with attention to angiotensin II receptor blockers, such as olmesartan, along with travel histories to identify potential etiologies of villous atrophy. This will guide additional testing. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Patients should be analyzed for disease-associated variants in human leukocyte antigen genes; results must be carefully interpreted. Negative results can be used to rule out celiac disease in seronegative patients. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Patients with suspected celiac disease who are seronegative but have villous atrophy and genetic risk factors for celiac disease must undergo endoscopic evaluation after 1-3 years on a gluten-free diet to evaluate improvements in villous atrophy. A diagnosis of seronegative celiac disease can then be confirmed based on clinical and histologic markers of improvement on the gluten-free diet. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Seronegative patients with an identified cause for enteropathy should be treated accordingly; a follow-up biopsy might or might not be necessary. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Patients with persistent signs and symptoms who do not respond to a gluten-free diet, and for whom no etiology of enteropathy is ultimately identified, should be treated with budesonide.

CONCLUSIONS

These best practice guidelines will aid in diagnosis and management of patients with suspected celiac disease, but negative results from serologic tests.

Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Coeliac Disease and Gluten-Related Disorders

The spectrum of gluten-related disorders (GRD) has emerged as a relevant phenomenon possibly impacting on health care procedures and costs worldwide. Current classification of GRD is mainly based on their pathophysiology, and the following categories can be distinguished: immune-mediated disorders that include coeliac disease (CD), dermatitis herpetiformis (DH), and gluten ataxia (GA); allergic reactions such as wheat allergy (WA); and non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS), a condition characterized by both gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms subjectively believed to be induced by the ingestion of gluten/wheat that has recently gained popularity. Although CD, DH, and WA are well-defined clinical entities, whose diagnosis is based on specific diagnostic criteria, a diagnosis of NCGS may on the contrary be considered only after the exclusion of other organic disorders. Neither allergic nor autoimmune mechanisms have been found to be involved in NCGS. Mistakes in the diagnosis of GRD are still a relevant clinical problem that may result in overtreatment of patients being unnecessary started on a gluten-free diet and waste of health-care resources. On the basis of our clinical experience and literature, we aim to identify the main pitfalls in the diagnosis of CD and its complications, DH, and WA. We provide a practical methodological approach to guide clinicians on how to recognize and avoid them.