Best practice in the management of mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis and achieving maintenance of remission using mesalazine

Curative effect of different routes of mesalazine administration in treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis

AIM

To compare the curative effect of three different routes of mesalazine administration in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

A total of 227 mild to moderate UC cases were recruited at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from July 2012 to May 2015. Oral, topical, or combined route of administration of mesalazine was adopted. At 30 d and 1 year after treatment, clinical efficacy was compared among different groups, and related epidemiological risk factors were retrospectively identified.

RESULTS

For all the included UC patients, the total effective rate at 30 d was 76.00% for the oral medication group, 79.31% for the local group, and 93.64% for the combined group, and there was a significant difference in the total effective rate between the oral and combined groups (χ² = 8.662, P = 0.003) and between the local and combined groups (χ² = 6.618, P = 0.010), but not between the oral and local groups. At 1 year, the effective rates of the three groups were 62.50%, 73.08%, and 91.84%, respectively. For each administration route, there was no significant difference in the effective rate between long-term and short-term observation. However, the long-term complete remission rate in the single-route groups showed an obviously decreasing trend (oral 28% vs 12.50%, local 34.48% vs 15.38%), while the curative effect in the combined group was stable (51.02% vs 50.87%). Logistic regression analysis showed that administration route was an independent risk factor affecting the effect of mesalazine, while gender, age, smoking, BMI, disease duration, and lesion degree/range were not.

CONCLUSION

Mesalazine is an effective drug to treat mild to moderate UC. Combined oral/topical usage has higher efficacy than each of the two separate applications.

Management of ulcerative colitis in Taiwan: consensus guideline of the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease characterized by chronic mucosal inflammation of the colon, and the prevalence and incidence of UC have been steadily increasing in Taiwan. A steering committee was established by the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease to formulate statements on the diagnosis and management of UC taking into account currently available evidence and the expert opinion of the committee. Accurate diagnosis of UC requires thorough clinical, endoscopic, and histological assessment and careful exclusion of differential diagnoses, particularly infectious colitis. The goals of UC therapy are to induce and maintain remission, reduce the risk of complications, and improve quality of life. As outlined in the recommended treatment algorithm, choice of treatment is dictated by severity, extent, and course of disease. Patients should be evaluated for hepatitis B virus and tuberculosis infection prior to immunosuppressive treatment, especially with steroids and biologic agents, and should be regularly monitored for reactivation of latent infection. These consensus statements are also based on current local evidence with consideration of factors, and could be serve as concise and practical guidelines for supporting clinicians in the management of UC in Taiwan.

Medical Therapy of Active Ulcerative Colitis

Background

Medical therapy of mild and moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) of any extent is evidence-based and standardized by national and international guidelines. However, patients with steroid-refractory UC still represent a challenge.

Methods

A literature search using PubMed (search terms: ulcerative colitis, therapy, new, 1-2008-2015) resulted in 821 publications. For the current article, 88 citations were extracted including 36 randomized controlled studies, 18 reviews, and 8 meta-analyses.

Results

In steroid-refractory UC, early intensive therapy using anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies or the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus is indicated in any case to prevent progression to a toxic megacolon and/or to avoid proctocolectomy. In patients with chronic disease activity, treatment with anti-TNF antibodies has a higher level of evidence than azathioprine therapy and should therefore be preferred. However, there is a subgroup of UC patients who may achieve prolonged steroid-free remission on azathioprine monotherapy. The importance of vedolizumab, a newly registered inhibiting antibody against integrin, has not yet been fully clarified since direct comparison studies are lacking, in particular in relation to anti-TNF antibodies.

Conclusion

There is a great need for additional innovative therapies, especially in cases of primary non-response or secondary loss of response to anti-TNF antibodies. New small molecules (Janus kinase inhibitors) are promising with an acceptable safety profile and efficacy in UC. Further, strategies that target the intestinal microbiome are currently considered for patients with active or relapsing UC, and may in the future open up new therapeutic options.

eHealth: individualization of mesalazine treatment through a self-managed web-based solution in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

To individualize treatment with mesalazine for ulcerative colitis relapses through a self-managed, web-based solution to optimize the short-term disease course.

METHODS

Prospective, open-label, web-guided study with 3 months mesalazine therapy among patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Once a week, patients completed the simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI) and registered fecal calprotectin (FC) on the web application: www.meza.constant-care.dk. SCCAI and FC were summed and resulted in a total inflammatory burden score (TIBS). Deep remission was defined as SCCAI ≤1; FC = 0, and TIBS ≤1.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients (62% females; median age 45 yr) were included in the study and allocated 4.8 g mesalazine per day. Of these, 82 (86%) patients were adherent to web therapy, completing 3 months of web-guided mesalazine therapy. Of the 82 adherent patients, 72 (88%) continued mesalazine and 10 (12%) needed rescue therapy. From weeks 0 to 12, patients had experienced a significant reduction in mean SCCAI (4.6 versus 1.6, P < 0.001), mean FC (437 versus 195, P < 0.001), and mean TIBS (6.7 versus 2.4, P < 0.001). Based on TIBS values (≤1), the dose of mesalazine was reduced to 2.4 g in 25% of patients at week 3 in 50% of subjects at week 5 and in 88% of patients at week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

Web-guided therapy with mesalazine in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis helps to individualize the dose and improve adherence to therapy. The study confirms mesalazine efficacy in mild-to-moderate UC, significantly improving TIBS values in majority of the patients.

Treatment of new-onset ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Although guidelines recommend use of oral 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs) as first-line therapy in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) and ulcerative proctitis (UP) and steroids with or without 5-ASAs in those more severely ill, little is known about how UC and UP are actually treated.

AIM

To document treatment of new-onset UC and UP in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Using a large US health insurance database, we identified all persons with new-onset UC or UP between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2007, based on: (i) initial receipt of an oral 5-ASA, mesalazine (mesalamine) suppository, 5-ASA enema, steroid, antimetabolite, budesonide or TNF inhibitor; (ii) sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in prior 30 days resulting in a new diagnosis of UC or UP and (iii) no prior encounters for Crohn's disease. We examined patterns of pharmacotherapy over 1 year.

RESULTS

We identified 1516 UC patients and 636 UP patients who met study entry criteria. In UC, initial therapies most frequently used were oral 5-ASAs (53% of patients), oral 5-ASAs and systemic steroids (12%), systemic steroids (8%) and mesalazine suppositories (6%); in UP, mesalazine suppositories (42%) and oral 5-ASAs (19%) were most often used, followed by combination therapy (14%), mesalazine enema (11%) and rectal steroids (10%). Few patients received maintenance therapy, and there was limited use of antimetabolites and biological agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral 5-ASAs and systemic steroids are the mainstay of treatment in patients with new-onset ulcerative colitis; in those with new-onset ulcerative proctitis, it is mesalazine suppositories. Care of these patients appears consistent with treatment guidelines.