1
|
Noor NM, Lee JC, Bond S, Dowling F, Brezina B, Patel KV, Ahmad T, Banim PJ, Berrill JW, Cooney R, De La Revilla Negro J, de Silva S, Din S, Durai D, Gordon JN, Irving PM, Johnson M, Kent AJ, Kok KB, Moran GW, Mowat C, Patel P, Probert CS, Raine T, Saich R, Seward A, Sharpstone D, Smith MA, Subramanian S, Upponi SS, Wiles A, Williams HRT, van den Brink GR, Vermeire S, Jairath V, D'Haens GR, McKinney EF, Lyons PA, Lindsay JO, Kennedy NA, Smith KGC, Parkes M. A biomarker-stratified comparison of top-down versus accelerated step-up treatment strategies for patients with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease (PROFILE): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:415-427. [PMID: 38402895 PMCID: PMC11001594 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(24)00034-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management strategies and clinical outcomes vary substantially in patients newly diagnosed with Crohn's disease. We evaluated the use of a putative prognostic biomarker to guide therapy by assessing outcomes in patients randomised to either top-down (ie, early combined immunosuppression with infliximab and immunomodulator) or accelerated step-up (conventional) treatment strategies. METHODS PROFILE (PRedicting Outcomes For Crohn's disease using a moLecular biomarker) was a multicentre, open-label, biomarker-stratified, randomised controlled trial that enrolled adults with newly diagnosed active Crohn's disease (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≥7, either elevated C-reactive protein or faecal calprotectin or both, and endoscopic evidence of active inflammation). Potential participants had blood drawn to be tested for a prognostic biomarker derived from T-cell transcriptional signatures (PredictSURE-IBD assay). Following testing, patients were randomly assigned, via a secure online platform, to top-down or accelerated step-up treatment stratified by biomarker subgroup (IBDhi or IBDlo), endoscopic inflammation (mild, moderate, or severe), and extent (colonic or other). Blinding to biomarker status was maintained throughout the trial. The primary endpoint was sustained steroid-free and surgery-free remission to week 48. Remission was defined by a composite of symptoms and inflammatory markers at all visits. Flare required active symptoms (HBI ≥5) plus raised inflammatory markers (CRP >upper limit of normal or faecal calprotectin ≥200 μg/g, or both), while remission was the converse-ie, quiescent symptoms (HBI <5) or resolved inflammatory markers (both CRP ≤ the upper limit of normal and calprotectin <200 μg/g) or both. Analyses were done in the full analysis (intention-to-treat) population. The trial has completed and is registered (ISRCTN11808228). FINDINGS Between Dec 29, 2017, and Jan 5, 2022, 386 patients (mean age 33·6 years [SD 13·2]; 179 [46%] female, 207 [54%] male) were randomised: 193 to the top-down group and 193 to the accelerated step-up group. Median time from diagnosis to trial enrolment was 12 days (range 0-191). Primary outcome data were available for 379 participants (189 in the top-down group; 190 in the accelerated step-up group). There was no biomarker-treatment interaction effect (absolute difference 1 percentage points, 95% CI -15 to 15; p=0·944). Sustained steroid-free and surgery-free remission was significantly more frequent in the top-down group than in the accelerated step-up group (149 [79%] of 189 patients vs 29 [15%] of 190 patients, absolute difference 64 percentage points, 95% CI 57 to 72; p<0·0001). There were fewer adverse events (including disease flares) and serious adverse events in the top-down group than in the accelerated step-up group (adverse events: 168 vs 315; serious adverse events: 15 vs 42), with fewer complications requiring abdominal surgery (one vs ten) and no difference in serious infections (three vs eight). INTERPRETATION Top-down treatment with combination infliximab plus immunomodulator achieved substantially better outcomes at 1 year than accelerated step-up treatment. The biomarker did not show clinical utility. Top-down treatment should be considered standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed active Crohn's disease. FUNDING Wellcome and PredictImmune Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nurulamin M Noor
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | - James C Lee
- Genetic Mechanisms of Disease Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive Diseases, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Simon Bond
- Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Francis Dowling
- Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Biljana Brezina
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kamal V Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Paul J Banim
- Department of Gastroenterology, James Paget University Hospital, Great Yarmouth, UK
| | - James W Berrill
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK
| | - Rachel Cooney
- GI Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Juan De La Revilla Negro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shanika de Silva
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - Shahida Din
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Dharmaraj Durai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - John N Gordon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew Johnson
- Gastroenterology Department, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Luton, UK
| | - Alexandra J Kent
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Klaartje B Kok
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Gordon W Moran
- National Institute of Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - Craig Mowat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Pritash Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals, Carshalton, UK
| | - Chris S Probert
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rebecca Saich
- Department of Gastroenterology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Abigail Seward
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dan Sharpstone
- Department of Gastroenterology, West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Bury St Edmunds, UK
| | - Melissa A Smith
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Sreedhar Subramanian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sara S Upponi
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alan Wiles
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Trust, King's Lynn, UK
| | - Horace R T Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Geert R D'Haens
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eoin F McKinney
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK; PredictImmune Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul A Lyons
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK; PredictImmune Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Kenneth G C Smith
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK; PredictImmune Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Miles Parkes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vieujean S, Lindsay JO, D'Amico F, Ahuja V, Silverberg MS, Sood A, Yamamoto-Furusho JK, Nagahori M, Watanabe M, Koutroubakis IE, Foteinogiannopoulou K, Avni Biron I, Walsh A, Outtier A, Nordestgaard RLM, Abreu MT, Dubinsky M, Siegel C, Louis E, Dotan I, Reinisch W, Danese S, Rubin DT, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Analysis of Clinical Trial Screen Failures in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases [IBD]: Real World Results from the International Organization for the study of IBD. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:548-559. [PMID: 37864829 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruitment for randomized controlled trials [RCTs] in inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] has substantially dropped over time. This study aimed to assess reasons why IBD patients are not included in sponsored multicentre phase IIb-III RCTs. METHODS All IOIBD members [n = 58] were invited to participate. We divided barriers to participation as follows: [1] reasons patients with active IBD were not deemed appropriate for an RCT; [2] reasons qualified patients did not wish to participate; and [3] reasons for screen failure [SF] in patients agreeing to participate. We assess these in a 4-week prospective study including, consecutively, all patients with symptomatic disease for whom a treatment change was required. In addition, we performed a 6-month retrospective study to further evaluate reasons for SF. RESULTS A total of 106 patients (60 male [56.6%], 63 Crohn's disease [CD] [59.4%]), from ten centres across the world, were included in the prospective study. An RCT has not been proposed to 65 of them [mainly due to eligibility criteria]. Of the 41 patients to whom an RCT was offered, eight refused [mainly due to reluctance to receive placebo] and 28 agreed to participate. Among these 28 patients, five failed their screening and 23 were finally included in an RCT. A total of 107 patients (61 male [57%], 67 CD [62.6%]), from 13 centres worldwide, were included in our retrospective study of SFs. The main reason was insufficient disease activity. CONCLUSION This first multicentre study analysing reasons for non-enrolment in IBD RCTs shows that we lose patients at each step. Eligibility criteria, the risk of placebo assignment, and insufficient disease activity were part of the main barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Vieujean
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - James O Lindsay
- Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ferdinando D'Amico
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Vineet Ahuja
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Ajit Sood
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiāna, Punjab, India
| | - Jesus K Yamamoto-Furusho
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinic, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Tlalpa, Mexico
| | - Masakazu Nagahori
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mamoru Watanabe
- Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ioannis E Koutroubakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Irit Avni Biron
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Alissa Walsh
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - An Outtier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Maria T Abreu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Marla Dubinsky
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Corey Siegel
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Edouard Louis
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Iris Dotan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Walter Reinisch
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - David T Rubin
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, F-54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- INSERM, NGERE, University of Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France
- INFINY Institute, Nancy University Hospital, F-54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- FHU-CURE, Nancy University Hospital, F-54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Groupe Hospitalier privé Ambroise Paré - Hartmann, Paris IBD center, 92200 Neuilly sur Seine, France
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wyatt NJ, Watson H, Anderson CA, Kennedy NA, Raine T, Ahmad T, Allerton D, Bardgett M, Clark E, Clewes D, Cotobal Martin C, Doona M, Doyle JA, Frith K, Hancock HC, Hart AL, Hildreth V, Irving PM, Iqbal S, Kennedy C, King A, Lawrence S, Lees CW, Lees R, Letchford L, Liddle T, Lindsay JO, Maier RH, Mansfield JC, Marchesi JR, McGregor N, McIntyre RE, Ostermayer J, Osunnuyi T, Powell N, Prescott NJ, Satsangi J, Sharma S, Shrestha T, Speight A, Strickland M, Wason JM, Whelan K, Wood R, Young GR, Zhang X, Parkes M, Stewart CJ, Jostins-Dean L, Lamb CA. Defining predictors of responsiveness to advanced therapies in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: protocol for the IBD-RESPONSE and nested CD-metaRESPONSE prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study in precision medicine. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e073639. [PMID: 38631839 PMCID: PMC11029295 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Characterised by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) symptoms including diarrhoea, abdominal pain and fatigue can significantly impact patient's quality of life. Therapeutic developments in the last 20 years have revolutionised treatment. However, clinical trials and real-world data show primary non-response rates up to 40%. A significant challenge is an inability to predict which treatment will benefit individual patients.Current understanding of IBD pathogenesis implicates complex interactions between host genetics and the gut microbiome. Most cohorts studying the gut microbiota to date have been underpowered, examined single treatments and produced heterogeneous results. Lack of cross-treatment comparisons and well-powered independent replication cohorts hampers the ability to infer real-world utility of predictive signatures.IBD-RESPONSE will use multi-omic data to create a predictive tool for treatment response. Future patient benefit may include development of biomarker-based treatment stratification or manipulation of intestinal microbial targets. IBD-RESPONSE and downstream studies have the potential to improve quality of life, reduce patient risk and reduce expenditure on ineffective treatments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This prospective, multicentre, observational study will identify and validate a predictive model for response to advanced IBD therapies, incorporating gut microbiome, metabolome, single-cell transcriptome, human genome, dietary and clinical data. 1325 participants commencing advanced therapies will be recruited from ~40 UK sites. Data will be collected at baseline, week 14 and week 54. The primary outcome is week 14 clinical response. Secondary outcomes include clinical remission, loss of response in week 14 responders, corticosteroid-free response/remission, time to treatment escalation and change in patient-reported outcome measures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 5 (ref: 21/WA/0228). Recruitment is ongoing. Following study completion, results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings. Publications will be summarised at www.ibd-response.co.uk. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN96296121.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola J Wyatt
- Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Hannah Watson
- Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Carl A Anderson
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Dean Allerton
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Michelle Bardgett
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Emma Clark
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dawn Clewes
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Mary Doona
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jennifer A Doyle
- Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Katherine Frith
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Helen C Hancock
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Victoria Hildreth
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sameena Iqbal
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Ciara Kennedy
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew King
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sarah Lawrence
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Charlie W Lees
- Institute of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert Lees
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Laura Letchford
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Trevor Liddle
- Research Informatics Team, Clinical Research, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca H Maier
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - John C Mansfield
- Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Julian R Marchesi
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Naomi McGregor
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | | | - Nick Powell
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalie J Prescott
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jack Satsangi
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Shriya Sharma
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tara Shrestha
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ally Speight
- Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - James Ms Wason
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kevin Whelan
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ruth Wood
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Gregory R Young
- Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Xinyue Zhang
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Miles Parkes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christopher J Stewart
- Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Christopher A Lamb
- Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lindsay JO, Hind D, Swaby L, Berntsson H, Bradburn M, Bannur C U, Byrne J, Clarke C, Desoysa L, Dickins B, Din S, Emsley R, Foulds GA, Gribben J, Hawkey C, Irving PM, Kazmi M, Lee E, Loban A, Lobo A, Mahida Y, Moran GW, Papaioannou D, Parkes M, Peniket A, Pockley AG, Satsangi J, Subramanian S, Travis S, Turton E, Uttenthal B, Rutella S, Snowden JA. Safety and efficacy of autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with low-dose cyclophosphamide mobilisation and reduced intensity conditioning versus standard of care in refractory Crohn's disease (ASTIClite): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:333-345. [PMID: 38340759 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00460-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A previous controlled trial of autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with refractory Crohn's disease did not meet its primary endpoint and reported high toxicity. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of HSCT with an immune-ablative regimen of reduced intensity versus standard of care in this patient population. METHODS This open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial was conducted in nine National Health Service hospital trusts across the UK. Adults (aged 18-60 years) with active Crohn's disease on endoscopy (Simplified Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SES-CD] ulcer sub-score of ≥2) refractory to two or more classes of biological therapy, with no perianal or intra-abdominal sepsis or clinically significant comorbidity, were recruited. Participants were centrally randomly assigned (2:1) to either HSCT with a reduced dose of cyclophosphamide (intervention group) or standard care (control group). Randomisation was stratified by trial site by use of random permuted blocks of size 3 and 6. Patients in the intervention group underwent stem-cell mobilisation (cyclophosphamide 1 g/m2 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 μg/kg) and stem-cell harvest (minimum 2·0 × 106 CD34+ cells per kg), before conditioning (fludarabine 125 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin [thymoglobulin] 7·5 mg/kg in total) and subsequent stem-cell reinfusion supported by G-CSF. Patients in the control group continued any available conventional, biological, or nutritional therapy. The primary outcome was absence of endoscopic ulceration (SES-CD ulcer sub-score of 0) without surgery or death at week 48, analysed in the intention-to-treat population by central reading. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, 17160440. FINDINGS Between Oct 18, 2018, and Nov 8, 2019, 49 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 23 (47%) were randomly assigned: 13 (57%) to the intervention group and ten (43%) to the control group. In the intervention group, ten (77%) participants underwent HSCT and nine (69%) reached 48-week follow-up; in the control group, nine (90%) reached 48-week follow-up. The trial was halted in response to nine reported suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions in six (46%) patients in the intervention group, including renal failure due to proven thrombotic microangiopathy in three participants and one death due to pulmonary veno-occlusive disease. At week 48, absence of endoscopic ulceration without surgery or death was reported in three (43%) of seven participants in the intervention group and in none of six participants in the control group with available data. Serious adverse events were more frequent in the intervention group (38 in 13 [100%] patients) than in the control group (16 in four [40%] patients). A second patient in the intervention group died after week 48 of respiratory and renal failure. INTERPRETATION Although HSCT with an immune-ablative regimen of reduced intensity decreased endoscopic disease activity, significant adverse events deem this regimen unsuitable for future clinical use in patients with refractory Crohn's disease. FUNDING Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, a Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research partnership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Lizzie Swaby
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hannah Berntsson
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mike Bradburn
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Uday Bannur C
- Department of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jennifer Byrne
- Department of Haematology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Christopher Clarke
- Department of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lauren Desoysa
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ben Dickins
- John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | - Shahida Din
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Richard Emsley
- Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Gemma A Foulds
- John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | - John Gribben
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Christopher Hawkey
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and Saint Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Majid Kazmi
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ellen Lee
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Amanda Loban
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alan Lobo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Yashwant Mahida
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Gordon W Moran
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Diana Papaioannou
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Miles Parkes
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew Peniket
- Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - A Graham Pockley
- John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jack Satsangi
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Simon Travis
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Emily Turton
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ben Uttenthal
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sergio Rutella
- John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | - John A Snowden
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Department of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peyrin-Biroulet L, Panaccione R, Louis E, Atreya R, Rubin DT, Lindsay JO, Siffledeen J, Lukin DJ, Wright J, Watanabe K, Ford S, Remple VP, Lacerda AP, Dubcenco E, Garrison A, Zhou Q, Berg S, Anyanwu SI, Schreiber S. Upadacitinib Achieves Clinical and Endoscopic Outcomes in Crohn's Disease Regardless of Prior Biologic Exposure. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S1542-3565(24)00253-2. [PMID: 38492904 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Upadacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, achieved significantly higher rates of clinical remission and endoscopic response vs placebo during induction (U-EXCEL [NCT03345849], U-EXCEED [NCT03345836]) and maintenance (U-ENDURE [NCT03345823]) treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. Prior biologic failure is often associated with reduced responses to subsequent therapies. This post hoc analysis assessed upadacitinib efficacy by prior biologic failure status. METHODS Patients were randomized to placebo or upadacitinib 45 mg (UPA45) for 12 weeks (induction). UPA45 clinical responders were enrolled in U-ENDURE and rerandomized to placebo, upadacitinib 15 mg, or upadacitinib 30 mg (UPA30) for 52 weeks. Assessments were by prior biologic failure. RESULTS Of 1021 patients, 733 (71.8%) had prior biologic failure. Across outcomes and subgroups, upadacitinib-treated patients achieved higher rates vs placebo. During induction, upadacitinib had higher rates vs placebo for clinical remission based on stool frequency/abdominal pain score (without failure: 54.0% vs 28.3%; with failure: 42.2% vs 14.1%) and endoscopic response (without failure: 52.0% vs 16.2%; with failure: 35.7% vs 5.3%). In maintenance, the greatest treatment effect (upadacitinib vs placebo) was among patients with prior biologic failure treated with UPA30 (clinical remission without failure: 58.5% vs 32.7%; with failure: 42.5% vs 8.7%; endoscopic response without failure: 43.9% vs 17.9%; with failure: 38.9% vs 4.0%). Patients without vs with prior biologic failure had fewer adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Upadacitinib led to higher absolutes rates of clinical and endoscopic outcomes in patients without vs with prior biologic failure. Patients treated with upadacitinib achieved greater rates of clinical and endoscopic improvements vs placebo, regardless of prior biologic exposure. CLINICALTRIALS gov: NCT03345849, NCT03345836, NCT03345823.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; INSERM, NGERE, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France; INFINY Institute, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; FHU-CURE, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré - Hartmann, Paris IBD Center, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Edouard Louis
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, University Hospital CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Raja Atreya
- First Department of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - David T Rubin
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jesse Siffledeen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Covenant Health Grey Nuns Community Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Dana J Lukin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Kenji Watanabe
- Department of Internal Medicine for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department Internal Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Whelan K, Bancil AS, Lindsay JO, Chassaing B. Ultra-processed foods and food additives in gut health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:10.1038/s41575-024-00893-5. [PMID: 38388570 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-024-00893-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and food additives have become ubiquitous components of the modern human diet. There is increasing evidence of an association between diets rich in UPFs and gut disease, including inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer and irritable bowel syndrome. Food additives are added to many UPFs and have themselves been shown to affect gut health. For example, evidence shows that some emulsifiers, sweeteners, colours, and microparticles and nanoparticles have effects on a range of outcomes, including the gut microbiome, intestinal permeability and intestinal inflammation. Broadly speaking, evidence for the effect of UPFs on gut disease comes from observational epidemiological studies, whereas, by contrast, evidence for the effect of food additives comes largely from preclinical studies conducted in vitro or in animal models. Fewer studies have investigated the effect of UPFs or food additives on gut health and disease in human intervention studies. Hence, the aim of this article is to critically review the evidence for the effects of UPF and food additives on gut health and disease and to discuss the clinical application of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Whelan
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Aaron S Bancil
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Barts and the London School of Medicine, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Panaccione R, Danese S, Zhou W, Klaff J, Ilo D, Yao X, Levy G, Higgins PDR, Loftus EV, Chen S, Gonzalez YS, Leonard C, Hébuterne X, Lindsay JO, Cao Q, Nakase H, Colombel JF, Vermeire S. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for 16-week extended induction and 52-week maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 59:393-408. [PMID: 38010661 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upadacitinib is an oral, selective Janus kinase inhibitor. AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis following 16-week extended induction therapy, and 52-week maintenance therapy in patients achieving clinical response after 16-week extended induction therapy METHODS: Patients without clinical response to 8 weeks' upadacitinib 45 mg once daily induction therapy in two induction trials were eligible for an additional 8 weeks of therapy. Patients achieving clinical response at Week 16 were subsequently re-randomised (1:1) to upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg once daily for 52-week maintenance therapy. Efficacy was assessed at induction Week 16 (integrated) and maintenance Week 52; safety was assessed throughout. RESULTS Overall, 127/663 (19.2%) patients did not achieve clinical response to upadacitinib 45 mg at Week 8 and received an additional 8 weeks of therapy; 75/127 (59.1%) subsequently achieved clinical response at Week 16 and entered the maintenance trial. At Week 52, 26.5% of patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg, and 43.6% receiving 30 mg, achieved clinical remission; efficacy was observed across all other endpoints with both doses. Herpes zoster rates increased with longer duration (16 weeks) of exposure to upadacitinib 45 mg during induction compared with the same population during the first 8 weeks. No other new safety signals were observed, and results are otherwise consistent with the known safety profile of upadacitinib. CONCLUSIONS Patients without clinical response after 8 weeks' upadacitinib 45 mg induction therapy, may benefit from an additional 8 weeks of therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02819635; NCT03653026.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remo Panaccione
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Wen Zhou
- AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Dapo Ilo
- AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Xuan Yao
- AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Peter D R Higgins
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Edward V Loftus
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Su Chen
- AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | - Xavier Hébuterne
- Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - James O Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Qian Cao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hiroshi Nakase
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alexander JL, Wyatt NJ, Camuzeaux S, Chekmeneva E, Jimenez B, Sands CJ, Fuller H, Takis P, Ahmad T, Doyle JA, Hart A, Irving PM, Kennedy NA, Lees CW, Lindsay JO, McIntyre RE, Parkes M, Prescott NJ, Raine T, Satsangi J, Speight RA, Jostins-Dean L, Powell N, Marchesi JR, Stewart CJ, Lamb CA. Considerations for peripheral blood transport and storage during large-scale multicentre metabolome research. Gut 2024; 73:379-383. [PMID: 36754608 PMCID: PMC10850673 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-329297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- James L Alexander
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nicola J Wyatt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephane Camuzeaux
- National Phenome Centre, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Elena Chekmeneva
- National Phenome Centre, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Beatriz Jimenez
- National Phenome Centre, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline J Sands
- National Phenome Centre, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hannah Fuller
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Panteleimon Takis
- National Phenome Centre, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Jennifer A Doyle
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ailsa Hart
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
- School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Charlie W Lees
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Rebecca E McIntyre
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Miles Parkes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Natalie J Prescott
- Division of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Jack Satsangi
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Richard Alexander Speight
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Luke Jostins-Dean
- Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Nick Powell
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Julian R Marchesi
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Christopher J Stewart
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Christopher A Lamb
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gordon H, Wichmann K, Lewis A, Sanders T, Wildemann M, Hoti I, Hornsby E, Kok KB, Silver A, Lindsay JO, Stagg AJ. Human Intestinal Dendritic Cells Can Overcome Retinoic Acid Signaling to Generate Proinflammatory CD4 T Cells with Both Gut and Skin Homing Properties. J Immunol 2024; 212:96-106. [PMID: 37955427 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2300340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Retinoic acid, produced by intestinal dendritic cells (DCs), promotes T cell trafficking to the intestinal mucosa by upregulating α4β7 integrin and inhibiting the generation of cutaneous leukocyte Ag (CLA) required for skin entry. In the present study, we report that activation of human naive CD4 T cells in an APC-free system generates cells expressing α4β7 alone; in contrast, activation by intestinal DCs that produce retinoic acid and induce high levels of α4β7 also results in CLA expression, generating CLA+α4β7+ "dual tropic" cells, with both gut and skin trafficking potential, that also express high levels of α4β1 integrin. DC generation of CLA+α4β7+ T cells is associated with upregulation of FUT7, a fucosyltransferase involved in CLA generation; requires cell contact; and is enhanced by IL-12/IL-23. The blood CD4+ T cell population contains CLA+α4β7+ cells, which are significantly enriched for cells capable of IFN-γ, IL-17, and TNF-α production compared with conventional CLA-α4β7+ cells. Dual tropic lymphocytes are increased in intestinal tissue from patients with Crohn's disease, and single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis identifies a transcriptionally distinct cluster of FUT7-expressing cells present only in inflamed tissue; expression of genes associated with cell proliferation suggests that these cells are undergoing local activation. The expression of multiple trafficking molecules by CLA+α4β7+ T cells can enable their recruitment by alternative pathways to both skin and gut; they may contribute to both intestinal and cutaneous manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Gordon
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and dentistry, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine Wichmann
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and dentistry, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Lewis
- Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and dentistry, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Theodore Sanders
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and dentistry, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martha Wildemann
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and dentistry, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Inva Hoti
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and dentistry, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eve Hornsby
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and dentistry, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - K Bel Kok
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Silver
- Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and dentistry, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and dentistry, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Stagg
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and dentistry, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Long MD, Schreiber S, Hibi T, Gibble TH, Fisher DA, Park G, Moses RE, Higgins PDR, Lindsay JO, Lee SD, Escobar R, Jairath V. Association of Bowel Urgency With Quality-of-Life Measures in Patients With Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results From Phase 3 LUCENT-1 (Induction) and LUCENT-2 (Maintenance) Studies. Crohns Colitis 360 2024; 6:otae001. [PMID: 38313767 PMCID: PMC10838132 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otae001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Improvement in bowel urgency (BU) was associated with better clinical outcomes in phase 3 LUCENT-1 (induction) and LUCENT-2 (maintenance) studies in moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed association of BU with quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes. Methods LUCENT-1: 1162 patients randomized 3:1 to intravenous mirikizumab 300 mg or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 12 weeks. LUCENT-2: 544 mirikizumab induction responders re-randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous mirikizumab 200 mg or placebo Q4W through Week (W) 40 (W52 of continuous treatment). Patients reported BU severity in the past 24 hours using a validated Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). In patients with baseline Urgency NRS ≥3, the association between BU Clinically Meaningful Improvement (CMI; ≥3-point decrease) and remission (score 0 or 1) with patient-reported outcomes was assessed at W12 and W52. Results A significantly greater proportion of patients with versus without BU Remission achieved IBDQ remission (W12: 87.3% vs 42.7%, P < .0001; W52: 91.4% vs 45.5%, p < .0001). Similarly, BU Remission was associated with more patients achieving CMI in SF-36 Physical Component Summary (W12: 69.0% vs 44.4%, P < .0001; W52: 77.5% vs 42.1%, P < .0001) and Mental Component Summary (W12: 53.5% vs 41.0%, P = .0019; W52: 62.0% vs 38.3%, P < .0001) scores. At W12 and W52, patients with BU CMI or Remission showed significant improvements in EQ-5D-5L and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:UC scores. Significant improvements were also seen in fatigue, abdominal pain, and nocturnal stool. Conclusions In patients with moderately-to-severely active UC, improvement in BU was associated with improved QoL in phase 3 LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2 studies. Clinical Studies LUCENT-1: NCT03518086; LUCENT-2: NCT03524092.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Millie D Long
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Toshifumi Hibi
- Kitasato Institute Hospital, Minato-ku, Center for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Gina Park
- Techdata Services Company LLC, King of Prussia, PA, USA
| | | | - Peter D R Higgins
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Scott D Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Vipul Jairath
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mehandru S, Colombel JF, Juarez J, Bugni J, Lindsay JO. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of anti-trafficking therapies and their clinical relevance in inflammatory bowel disease. Mucosal Immunol 2023; 16:859-870. [PMID: 37574127 DOI: 10.1016/j.mucimm.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a combination of dysbiosis, increased intestinal permeability, and insufficient regulatory responses facilitate the development of chronic inflammation, which is driven by a complex interplay between the mucosal immune system and the environment and sustained by immune priming and ongoing cellular recruitment to the gut. The localization of immune cells is mediated by their expression of chemokine receptors and integrins, which bind to chemokines and adhesion molecules, respectively. In this article, we review the mechanisms of action of anti-trafficking therapies for IBD and consider clinical observations in the context of the different mechanisms of action. Furthermore, we discuss the evolution of molecular resistance to anti-cytokines, in which the composition of immune cells in the gut changes in response to treatment, and the potential implications of this for treatment sequencing. Lastly, we discuss the relevance of mechanism of action to combination therapy for IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurabh Mehandru
- The Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jean-Frederic Colombel
- The Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julius Juarez
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, MA, USA
| | - James Bugni
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, MA, USA
| | - James O Lindsay
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Watanabe K, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S, Fujitani Y, Faes M, Oortwijn A, Lindsay JO, Rogler G, Hibi T. Impact of Concomitant Thiopurine on the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Post hoc Analysis of the Phase 2b/3 SELECTION Study. J Crohns Colitis 2023:jjad201. [PMID: 38019901 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS SELECTION is the first study to assess the impact of concomitant thiopurine and other immunomodulator [IM] use on the efficacy and safety of a Janus kinase inhibitor, filgotinib, in patients with ulcerative colitis. METHODS Data from the phase 2b/3 SELECTION study were used for this post hoc analysis. Patients were randomized [2:2:1] to two induction studies [biologic-naive, biologic-experienced] to filgotinib 200 mg, 100 mg, or placebo. At week 10, patients receiving filgotinib were re-randomized [2:1] to continue filgotinib or switch to placebo until week 58 [maintenance]. Outcomes were compared between subgroups with and without concomitant IM use. RESULTS At week 10, a similar proportion of patients in +IM and -IM groups treated with filgotinib 200 mg achieved Mayo Clinic Score [MCS] response [biologic-naive: 65.8% vs 66.9%; biologic-experienced: 61.3% vs 50.5%] and clinical remission [biologic-naive: 26.0% vs 26.2%; biologic-experienced: 11.3% vs 11.5%]. At week 58, a similar proportion of patients in +IM and -IM groups treated with filgotinib 200 mg achieved MCS response [biologic-naive: 74.2% vs 75.0%; biologic-experienced: 45.5% vs 61.4%] and clinical remission [biologic-naive: 51.6% vs 47.4%; biologic-experienced: 22.7% vs 24.3%]. The probability of protocol-specified disease worsening during the maintenance study in patients treated with filgotinib 200 mg did not differ between +IM and -IM groups [p = 0.6700]. No differences were observed in the incidences of adverse events between +IM and -IM groups in induction/maintenance studies. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy and safety profiles of filgotinib treatment in SELECTION did not differ with or without concomitant IM use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Watanabe
- Department of Internal Medicine for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, The University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- CHRU-Nancy, Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy, France
- University of Lorraine, Inserm, NGERE, Nancy, France
| | - Silvio Danese
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Gerhard Rogler
- University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Toshifumi Hibi
- Center for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Kitasato Institute Hospital, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Carlson SL, Mathew L, Savage M, Kok K, Lindsay JO, Munro CA, McCarthy NE. Mucosal Immunity to Gut Fungi in Health and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Fungi (Basel) 2023; 9:1105. [PMID: 37998910 PMCID: PMC10672531 DOI: 10.3390/jof9111105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The gut microbiome is a diverse microbial community composed of bacteria, viruses, and fungi that plays a major role in human health and disease. Dysregulation of these gut organisms in a genetically susceptible host is fundamental to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While bacterial dysbiosis has been a predominant focus of research for many years, there is growing recognition that fungal interactions with the host immune system are an important driver of gut inflammation. Candida albicans is likely the most studied fungus in the context of IBD, being a near universal gut commensal in humans and also a major barrier-invasive pathogen. There is emerging evidence that intra-strain variation in C. albicans virulence factors exerts a critical influence on IBD pathophysiology. In this review, we describe the immunological impacts of variations in C. lbicans colonisation, morphology, genetics, and proteomics in IBD, as well as the clinical and therapeutic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean L. Carlson
- Centre for Immunobiology, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, UK
- Gastroenterology Department, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Liya Mathew
- Centre for Immunobiology, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, UK
| | - Michael Savage
- Centre for Immunobiology, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, UK
| | - Klaartje Kok
- Centre for Immunobiology, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, UK
- Gastroenterology Department, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - James O. Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, UK
- Gastroenterology Department, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Carol A. Munro
- Aberdeen Fungal Group, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK
| | - Neil E. McCarthy
- Centre for Immunobiology, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wong SY, Wellens J, Helmus D, Marlow L, Brann S, Martinez Pazos V, Weinberg A, Moran HR, McGregor C, Vermeire S, Watanabe K, Kamikozuru K, Ahuja V, Vermani S, Lindsay JO, Kingston A, Dutta U, Kaur H, Silverberg MS, Milgrom R, Chien Ng S, Mak JWY, Cadwell K, Thompson C, Colombel JF, Satsangi J. Geography Influences Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 Serological Response in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Multinational Analysis From the ICARUS-IBD Consortium. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29:1693-1705. [PMID: 37354560 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beyond systematic reviews and meta-analyses, there have been no direct studies of serological response to COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) across continents. In particular, there has been limited data from Asia, with no data reported from India. The ICARUS-IBD (International study of COVID-19 Antibody Response Under Sustained immunosuppression in IBD) consortium assessed serological response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with IBD in North America, Europe, and Asia. METHODS The ICARUS-IBD study is a multicenter observational cohort study spanning sites in 7 countries. We report seroprevalence data from 2303 patients with IBD before COVID-19 vaccination between May 2020 and November 2021. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid antibodies were analyzed. RESULTS The highest and lowest SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike seropositivity rates were found in Asia (81.2% in Chandigarh and 57.9% in Delhi, India; and 0% in Hong Kong). By multivariable analysis, country (India: odds ratio [OR], 18.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.03-26.95; P < .0001; United Kingdom: OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.58-3.72; P < .0001; United States: OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.27-3.85; P = .005), male sex (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.07-1.99; P = .016), and diabetes (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.04-5.46; P = .039) conferred higher seropositivity rates. Biological therapies associated with lower seroprevalence (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15-0.33; P < .0001). Multiple linear regression showed associations between anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid titers with medications (P < .0001) but not with country (P = .3841). CONCLUSIONS While the effects of medications on anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers in patients with IBD were consistent across sites, geographical location conferred the highest risk of susceptibility to serologically detectable SARS-CoV-2 infection. Over half of IBD patients in India were seropositive prior to vaccination. These insights can help to inform shielding advice, therapeutic choices, and vaccine strategies in IBD patients for COVID-19 and future viral challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serre-Yu Wong
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Judith Wellens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Drew Helmus
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luke Marlow
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stephanie Brann
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Vicky Martinez Pazos
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alan Weinberg
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hunter R Moran
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Colleen McGregor
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kenji Watanabe
- Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Division of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Koji Kamikozuru
- Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Division of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Vineet Ahuja
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Shubi Vermani
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - James O Lindsay
- Center for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London - Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ashley Kingston
- Center for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London - Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Usha Dutta
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Harmandeep Kaur
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Mark S Silverberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Raquel Milgrom
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Siew Chien Ng
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Joyce Wing Yan Mak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ken Cadwell
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Craig Thompson
- Division of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom
| | - Jean-Frédéric Colombel
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jack Satsangi
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vermeire S, Danese S, Zhou W, Ilo D, Klaff J, Levy G, Yao X, Chen S, Sanchez Gonzalez Y, Hébuterne X, Lindsay JO, Higgins PDR, Cao Q, Nakase H, Colombel JF, Loftus EV, Panaccione R. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in patients responding to 8 week induction therapy (U-ACHIEVE Maintenance): overall results from the randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 maintenance study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 8:976-989. [PMID: 37683686 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00208-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upadacitinib is an oral, selective, and reversible JAK inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in a phase 2b induction trial, two phase 3 induction trials (U-ACHIEVE Induction and U-ACCOMPLISH), and a primary analysis of the first 451 patients entering a subsequent maintenance trial (U-ACHIEVE Maintenance). Here, we present overall results from the entire U-ACHIEVE Maintenance population. METHODS In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 maintenance study done across Europe, North and South America, Australasia, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific region at 251 clinical centres in 44 countries, patients aged 16-75 years with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (adapted Mayo score 5-9, centrally assessed endoscopic subscore of 2 or 3) for 90 days or more were randomly assigned (2:1) to double-blind upadacitinib 45 mg once daily or placebo induction therapy in the phase 2b induction trial or two phase 3 induction trials. Patients with a clinical response per adapted Mayo score after 8 weeks were randomly reassigned (1:1:1) using web-based interactive response technology to 52 week double-blind maintenance therapy with placebo, upadacitinib 15 mg, or upadacitinib 30 mg once daily. Efficacy was analysed at week 52 in the intention-to-treat population, which included all patients randomly reassigned who received at least one dose of study drug. The primary endpoint was clinical remission per adapted Mayo score. Safety through week 52 was assessed with exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs; events per 100 patient-years) in upadacitinib 45 mg once daily 8-week induction responders who were enrolled per protocol for 44-week or 52-week maintenance therapy (ie, the intention-to-treat population plus patients who received up to 44 weeks' maintenance therapy under earlier protocol amendments) and received at least one dose of study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02819635 and is complete. FINDINGS Between Sept 3, 2016, and Jan 14, 2021 987 patients received the upadacitinib 45 mg once daily induction therapy in the phase 2b trial, U-ACHIEVE Induction, or U-ACCOMPLISH. 681 patients with a clinical response to the induction therapy (319 from U-ACHIEVE Induction, 341 from U-ACCOMPLISH, and 21 from the phase 2b induction trial) received placebo (n=223), upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (n=225), or upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (n=233) in U-ACHIEVE Maintenance and were included in this analysis. A greater proportion of patients achieved the primary endpoint with upadacitinib 15 mg (40·4%) and 30 mg once daily (53·6%) versus placebo (10·8%; both p<0·0001 vs placebo). For safety, 746 patients were analysed, representing 552·9 patient-years of exposure; the most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were worsening of ulcerative colitis in nine (4%) patients with placebo, and COVID-19 pneumonia and cryptococcal pneumonia in two (1%) patients each with upadacitinib 30 mg once daily. Higher EAERs of the following treatment-emergent events of special interest were observed with upadacitinib versus placebo: herpes zoster (6·0 events per 100 patient-years with upadacitinib 15 mg once daily and 7·3 events per 100 patient-years with upadacitinib 30 mg once daily vs none per 100 patient-years with placebo [12 and 16 vs no events, respectively), hepatic disorders (17·0 and 9·2 vs 5·9 events per 100 patient-years [34 and 20 vs eight events, respectively), creatine phosphokinase elevation (8·0 and 10·1 vs 3·7 events per 100 patient-years [16 and 22 vs five events], respectively), and neutropenia (5·5 and 8·7 vs 5·2 events per 100 patient-years [11 and 19 vs seven events], respectively). One (<1% of patients) adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular event occurred with placebo and one (<1% of patients) with upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (EAERs 0·7 and 0·5 events per 100 patient-years, respectively). Two (1% of patients) venous thromboembolic events occurred with upadacitinib 15 mg once daily and two (1% of patients) with upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (EAERs 1·0 and 0·9 events per 100 patient-years, respectively). All adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolic events with upadacitinib occurred in patients with relevant known risk factors. INTERPRETATION Consistent with the primary analysis done among a smaller population, both maintenance doses of upadacitinib showed a positive benefit-risk profile in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Upadacitinib represents an effective treatment option for this population, for whom a large unmet need persists. FUNDING AbbVie.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Su Chen
- AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Xavier Hébuterne
- Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - James O Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Peter D R Higgins
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Qian Cao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hiroshi Nakase
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Edward V Loftus
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Panés J, Loftus EV, Higgins PDR, Lindsay JO, Zhou W, Yao, X, Ilo D, Phillips C, Tran J, Sanchez Gonzalez Y, Vermeire S. Induction and Maintenance Treatment With Upadacitinib Improves Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Phase 3 Study Results. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29:1421-1430. [PMID: 36645051 PMCID: PMC10472742 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) benefits of upadacitinib (UPA) induction and maintenance treatment in a phase 3 study of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) across a broad range of patient-centered outcomes. METHODS Patients received UPA 45 mg once daily or placebo as induction treatment for 8 weeks. Patients who achieved clinical response were rerandomized to receive once daily UPA 15 mg, 30 mg, or placebo as maintenance treatment for 52 weeks. The percentages of patients reporting a clinically meaningful within-person change from baseline in the Ulcerative Colitis Symptoms Questionnaire, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, Work Productivity and Impairment Questionnaire, 36-Item Short Form Survey, and European Quality of Life-5 Dimension 5 Levels were evaluated at weeks 2 and 8 of induction and at weeks 0 and 52 of maintenance. RESULTS Significant improvements from baseline in all HRQoL measures except the Work Productivity and Impairment Questionnaire-absenteeism were achieved with UPA (P < .001) vs placebo as early as week 2 of induction. These improvements were sustained at week 52 with significantly more patients treated with either 15 mg or 30 mg UPA vs placebo achieving meaningful within-person change in the Ulcerative Colitis Symptoms Questionnaire; Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire; overall work impairment, presenteeism, and activity impairment; both 36-Item Short Form Survey Physical and Mental Component Summaries; and European Quality of Life-5 Dimension 5 Levels (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Induction treatment with UPA 45 mg significantly improved HRQoL measures. A significantly higher percentage of patients who responded to induction treatment with UPA maintained clinically meaningful improvements consistently across a wide range of HRQoL outcomes after 52 weeks of maintenance therapy with UPA (15 mg and 30 mg) compared with placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Numbers: NCT02819635, NCT03653026).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Panés
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edward V Loftus
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - James O Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wen Zhou
- AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Dapo Ilo
- AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Jacinda Tran
- AbbVie and the Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gordon H, Rodger B, Lindsay JO, Stagg AJ. Recruitment and Residence of Intestinal T Cells - Lessons for Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1326-1341. [PMID: 36806613 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Targeting leukocyte trafficking in the management of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] has been a significant therapeutic advance over the past 15 years. However, as with other advanced therapies, phase III clinical trials report response to trafficking inhibitors in only a proportion of patients, with fewer achieving clinical remission or mucosal healing. Additionally, there have been significant side effects, most notably progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in association with the α4 inhibitor natalizumab. This article reviews the mechanisms underpinning T cell recruitment and residence, to provide a background from which the strength and limitations of agents that disrupt leukocyte trafficking can be further explored. The therapeutic impact of trafficking inhibitors is underpinned by the complexity and plasticity of the intestinal immune response. Pathways essential for gut homing in health may be bypassed in the inflamed gut, thus providing alternative routes of entry when conventional homing molecules are targeted. Furthermore, there is conservation of trafficking architecture between proinflammatory and regulatory T cells. The persistence of resident memory cells within the gut gives rise to local established pro-inflammatory populations, uninfluenced by inhibition of trafficking. Finally, trafficking inhibitors may give rise to effects beyond the intended response, such as the impact of vedolizumab on innate immunity, as well as on target side effects. With significant research efforts into predictive biomarkers already underway, it is ultimately hoped that a better understanding of trafficking and residence will help us predict which patients are most likely to respond to inhibition of leukocyte trafficking, and how best to combine therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Gordon
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Barts & The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Beverley Rodger
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Barts & The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Barts & The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew J Stagg
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Barts & The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lim SH, Gros B, Sharma E, Lehmann A, Lindsay JO, Caulfield L, Gaya DR, Taylor J, Limdi J, Kwok J, Shuttleworth E, Dhar A, Burdge G, Selinger C, Cococcia S, Murray C, Balendran K, Raine T, George B, Walker G, Aldridge R, Irving P, Lees CW, Samaan M. Safety, Effectiveness, and Treatment Persistence of Subcutaneous Vedolizumab in IBD: A Multicenter Study From the United Kingdom. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023:izad166. [PMID: 37603730 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Despite intravenous (IV) vedolizumab being established for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the novel subcutaneous (SC) route of administration may provide numerous incentives to switch. However, large-scale real-world data regarding the long-term safety and effectiveness of this strategy are lacking. METHODS IBD patients on IV vedolizumab across 11 UK sites agreed to transition to SC injections or otherwise continued IV treatment. Data regarding clinical disease activity (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index, partial Mayo score, and modified Harvey-Bradshaw Index), biochemical markers (C-reactive protein and calprotectin), quality of life (IBD control), adverse events, treatment persistence, and disease-related outcomes (namely corticosteroid use, IBD-related hospitalization, and IBD-related surgery) were retrospectively collected from prospectively maintained clinical records at baseline and weeks 8, 24, and 52. RESULTS Data from 563 patients (187 [33.2%] Crohn's disease, 376 [66.8%] ulcerative colitis; 410 [72.8%] SC, 153 [27.2%] IV) demonstrated no differences in disease activity, remission rates, and quality of life between the SC and IV groups at all time points. Drug persistence at week 52 was similar (81.1% vs 81.2%; P = .98), as were rates of treatment alteration due to either active disease (12.2% vs 8.9%; P = .38) or adverse events (3.3% vs 6.3%; P = .41). At week 52, there were equivalent rates of adverse events (9.8% vs 7.8%; P = .572) and disease-related outcomes. IBD control scores were equivalent in both IV-IV and IV-SC groups. CONCLUSIONS Switching to SC vedolizumab appears as effective, safe, and well tolerated as continued IV treatment and maintains comparable disease control and quality of life as IV treatment at 52 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Hsiang Lim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Beatriz Gros
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Esha Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anouk Lehmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Bart's Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - James O Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Bart's Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Caulfield
- Department of Gastroenterology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel R Gaya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Jo Taylor
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jimmy Limdi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jon Kwok
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Elinor Shuttleworth
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Anjan Dhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Country Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Gemma Burdge
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Christian Selinger
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Cococcia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charles Murray
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Karthiha Balendran
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Becky George
- Department of Gastroenterology, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Walker
- Department of Gastroenterology, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, United Kingdom
| | - Robin Aldridge
- Department of Gastroenterology, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charlie W Lees
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Samaan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lindsay JO, Picker N, Kromer D, Smyth M, Patel H. The incidence of remission and indicators of inadequate response to advanced therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis: results from medical charts in the United Kingdom. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39:681-689. [PMID: 36951899 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2194782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A considerable proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with advanced therapies do not achieve remission, even after one year of treatment, and suboptimal response to advanced therapies is frequently observed in clinical practice. This study aims to analyze clinical practice data in the United Kingdom (UK) and assess the rates of clinical remission and inadequate response with advanced therapies among patients with UC. METHODS This retrospective chart review included patients with UC who initiated a new advanced therapy (i.e., adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, tofacitinib, or vedolizumab) between January 2017 and September 2019 from eight clinics across the UK. At least 12 months of data before and after starting an advanced therapy were required. Remission was assessed using components of the Mayo score. Inadequate response was defined by therapeutic adjustment or emergency treatment. RESULTS Among 238 patients included (female: 46.6%; median age: 42.0 years; median follow-up: 28.8 months), 178 patients (74.8%) were biologic-naïve. At 12 months, 87 patients (53.9%) had achieved remission (median time to remission: 7.6 months); although 29 (33.3%) among them had required therapeutic modifications to achieve remission. At 12 months, 105 patients (44.3%) had at least one indicator of an inadequate response (median time to first indicator of inadequate response: 18.0 months). CONCLUSIONS Nearly half of patients did not achieve remission, and almost half of included patients had an inadequate response within 1 year after treatment initiation. More effective therapies are needed to effectively treat UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lamidi S, Coe PO, Bordeianou LG, Hart AL, Hind D, Lindsay JO, Lobo AJ, Myrelid P, Raine T, Sebastian S, Fearnhead NS, Lee MJ, Adams K, Almer S, Ananthakrishnan A, Bethune RM, Block M, Brown SR, Cirocco WC, Cooney R, Davies RJ, Atici SD, Dhar A, Din S, Drobne D, Espin‐Basany E, Evans JP, Fleshner PR, Folkesson J, Fraser A, Graf W, Hahnloser D, Hager J, Hancock L, Hanzel J, Hargest R, Hedin CRH, Hill J, Ihle C, Jongen J, Kader R, Karmiris K, Katsanos KH, Keller DS, Kopylov U, Koutrabakis IE, Lamb CA, Landerholm K, Lee GC, Litta F, Limdi JK, Lopes EW, Madoff RD, Martin ST, Martin‐Perez B, Michalopoulos G, Millan M, Münch A, Nakov R, Noor NM, Oresland T, Paquette IM, Pellino G, Perra T, Porcu A, Roslani AC, Samaan MA, Sebepos‐Rogers GM, Segal JP, de Silva SD, Söderholm AM, Spinelli A, Speight RA, Steinhagen RM, Stenström P, Tsimogiannis KE, Varma MG, Verma AM, Verstockt B, Warden C, Yassin NA, Zawadzki A, Carr P, Devlin B, Avery MSP, Gecse KB, Goren I, Hellström PM, Kotze PG, McWhirter D, Naik AS, Sammour T, Selinger CP, Stein SL, Torres J, Wexner SD, Younge LC. Development of a core descriptor set for Crohn's anal fistula. Colorectal Dis 2022; 25:695-706. [PMID: 36461766 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
AIM Crohn's anal fistula (CAF) is a complex condition, with no agreement on which patient characteristics should be routinely reported in studies. The aim of this study was to develop a core descriptor set of key patient characteristics for reporting in all CAF research. METHOD Candidate descriptors were generated from published literature and stakeholder suggestions. Colorectal surgeons, gastroenterologists and specialist nurses in inflammatory bowel disease took part in three rounds of an international modified Delphi process using nine-point Likert scales to rank the importance of descriptors. Feedback was provided between rounds to allow refinement of the next ratings. Patterns in descriptor voting were assessed using principal component analysis (PCA). Resulting PCA groups were used to organize items in rounds two and three. Consensus descriptors were submitted to a patient panel for feedback. Items meeting predetermined thresholds were included in the final set and ratified at the consensus meeting. RESULTS One hundred and thirty three respondents from 22 countries completed round one, of whom 67.0% completed round three. Ninety seven descriptors were rated across three rounds in 11 PCA-based groups. Forty descriptors were shortlisted. The consensus meeting ratified a core descriptor set of 37 descriptors within six domains: fistula anatomy, current disease activity and phenotype, risk factors, medical interventions for CAF, surgical interventions for CAF, and patient symptoms and impact on quality of life. CONCLUSION The core descriptor set proposed for all future CAF research reflects characteristics important to gastroenterologists and surgeons. This might aid transparent reporting in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
-
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cox SR, Czuber-Dochan W, Wall CL, Clarke H, Drysdale C, Lomer MC, Lindsay JO, Whelan K. Improving Food-Related Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease through a Novel Web Resource: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2022; 14:nu14204292. [PMID: 36296976 PMCID: PMC9611328 DOI: 10.3390/nu14204292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Food-related quality of life (FR-QoL) is impaired in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and education and support on food-related issues in IBD is needed. This feasibility trial aimed to investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of a web resource in enhancing FR-QoL in newly diagnosed IBD. Patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis in the preceding 12 months, with an impaired FR-QoL, were recruited and randomised to either receive access to the web resource (covering IBD-specific diet concerns) or no access (control group) for 12 weeks, while receiving usual clinical care. FR-QoL, health-related quality of life, psychological outcomes, and clinical disease activity were assessed. Web resource usage was assessed, and patients' experiences of the web resource were investigated in semi-structured interviews. Of 81 patients screened, 50 participants were randomised, 30 to the web resource and 20 to control. FR-QoL increased more in the web resource (+11.7 SD 18.2) than control group (+1.4 SD 20.4) (p = 0.067), while IBD distress reduced in the web resource (-6.8 SD 26.6) and increased in the control group (+8.3 SD 25.5) (p = 0.052), albeit not statistically significantly. End of trial Crohn's disease clinical activity (PRO-2) was significantly lower in the web resource than control group (p = 0.046). Participants most frequently accessed web resource content discussing dietary management of gut symptoms and in semi-structured interviews, reported the website to contain relevant information. This feasibility study demonstrates potential effectiveness of the web resource on improving FR-QoL and psychological outcomes in IBD. An adequately powered effectiveness RCT is feasible to conduct and is now warranted. NCT03884686.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selina R. Cox
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK
| | - Wladyslawa Czuber-Dochan
- Midwifery and Palliative Care, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, King’s College London, London SE1 8WA, UK
| | - Catherine L. Wall
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK
| | - Hazel Clarke
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK
| | - Candice Drysdale
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK
| | - Miranda C. Lomer
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Dietetics, Guy’s & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - James O. Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Kevin Whelan
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wellens J, Edmans M, Obolski U, McGregor CG, Simmonds P, Turner M, Jarvis L, Skelly D, Dunachie S, Barnes E, Eyre DW, Colombel JF, Wong SY, Klenerman P, Lindsay JO, Satsangi J, Thompson CP. Combination therapy of infliximab and thiopurines, but not monotherapy with infliximab or vedolizumab, is associated with attenuated IgA and neutralisation responses to SARS-CoV-2 in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2022; 71:1919-1922. [PMID: 34911744 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Wellens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew Edmans
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Uri Obolski
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.,Porter School of Environmental and Earth Sciences, Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Peter Simmonds
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Marc Turner
- National Microbiology Reference Unit, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lisa Jarvis
- National Microbiology Reference Unit, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Donal Skelly
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Susanna Dunachie
- Department of Microbiology/Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Eleanor Barnes
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David W Eyre
- Department of Microbiology/Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Serre-Yu Wong
- The Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Paul Klenerman
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Jack Satsangi
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Craig P Thompson
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK .,Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Danese S, Vermeire S, Zhou W, Pangan AL, Siffledeen J, Greenbloom S, Hébuterne X, D'Haens G, Nakase H, Panés J, Higgins PDR, Juillerat P, Lindsay JO, Loftus EV, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, Chen MH, Sanchez Gonzalez Y, Huang B, Xie W, Liu J, Weinreich MA, Panaccione R. Upadacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results from three phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised trials. Lancet 2022; 399:2113-2128. [PMID: 35644166 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00581-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 76.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a great unmet need for advanced therapies that provide rapid, robust, and sustained disease control for patients with ulcerative colitis. We assessed the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. METHODS This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical programme consisted of two replicate induction studies (U-ACHIEVE induction [UC1] and U-ACCOMPLISH [UC2]) and a single maintenance study (U-ACHIEVE maintenance [UC3]). The studies were conducted across Europe, North and South America, Australasia, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific region at 199 clinical centres in 39 countries (UC1), 204 clinical centres in 40 countries (UC2), and 195 clinical centres in 35 countries (UC3). Patients aged 16-75 years with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (Adapted Mayo score 5-9; endoscopic subscore 2 or 3) for at least 90 days were randomly assigned (2:1) to oral upadacitinib 45 mg once daily or placebo for 8 weeks (induction studies). Patients who achieved clinical response following 8-week upadacitinib induction were re-randomly assigned (1:1:1) to upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo for 52 weeks (maintenance study). All patients were randomly assigned using web-based interactive response technology. The primary endpoints were clinical remission per Adapted Mayo score at week 8 (induction) and week 52 (maintenance). The efficacy analyses in the two induction studies were based on the intent-to-treat population, which included all randomised patients who received at least one dose of treatment. In the maintenance study, the primary efficacy analyses reported in this manuscript were based on the first 450 (planned) clinical responders to 8-week induction therapy with upadacitinib 45 mg once daily. The safety analysis population in the induction studies consisted of all randomised patients who received at least one dose of treatment; in the maintenance study, this population included all patients who received at least one dose of treatment as part of the primary analysis population. These studies are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02819635 (U-ACHIEVE) and NCT03653026 (U-ACCOMPLISH). FINDINGS Between Oct 23, 2018, and Sept 7, 2020, 474 patients were randomly assigned to upadacitinib 45 mg once daily (n=319) or placebo (n=155) in UC1. Between Dec 6, 2018, and Jan 14, 2021, 522 patients were randomly assigned to upadacitinib 45 mg once daily (n=345) or placebo (n=177) in UC2. In UC3, a total of 451 patients (21 from the phase 2b study, 278 from UC1, and 152 from UC2) who achieved a clinical response after 8 weeks of upadacitinib induction treatment were randomly assigned again to upadacitinib 15 mg (n=148), upadacitinib 30 mg (n=154), and placebo (n=149) in the primary analysis population. Statistically significantly more patients achieved clinical remission with upadacitinib 45 mg (83 [26%] of 319 patients in UC1 and 114 [34%] of 341 patients in UC2) than in the placebo group (seven [5%] of 154 patients in UC1 and seven [4%] of 174 patients; p<0·0001; adjusted treatment difference 21·6% [95% CI 15·8-27·4] for UC1 and 29·0% [23·2-34·7] for UC2). In the maintenance study, clinical remission was achieved by statistically significantly more patients receiving upadacitinib (15 mg 63 [42%] of 148; 30 mg 80 [52%] of 154) than those receiving placebo (18 [12%] of 149; p<0·0001; adjusted treatment difference 30·7% [21·7-39·8] for upadacitinib 15 mg vs placebo and 39·0% [29·7-48·2] for upadacitinib 30 mg vs placebo). The most commonly reported adverse events in UC1 were nasopharyngitis (15 [5%] of 319 in the upadacitinib 45 mg group vs six [4%] of 155 in the placebo group), creatine phosphokinase elevation (15 [4%] vs three [2%]), and acne (15 [5%] vs one [1%]). In UC2, the most frequently reported adverse event was acne (24 [7%] of 344 in the upadacitinib 45 mg group vs three [2%] of 177 in the placebo group). In both induction studies, serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment were less frequent in the upadacitinib 45 mg group than in the placebo group (serious adverse events eight [3%] vs nine (6%) in UC1 and 11 [3%] vs eight [5%] in UC2; adverse events leading to discontinuation six [2%] vs 14 [9%] in UC1 and six [2%] vs nine [5%] in UC2). In UC3, the most frequently reported adverse events (≥5%) were worsening of ulcerative colitis (19 [13%] of 148 in the upadacitinib 15 mg group vs 11 [7%] of 154 in the upadacitinib 30 mg group vs 45 [30%] of 149 in the placebo group), nasopharyngitis (18 [12%] vs 22 [14%] vs 15 [10%]), creatine phosphokinase elevation (nine [6%] vs 13 [8%] vs three [2%]), arthralgia (nine [6%] vs five [3%] vs 15 [10%]), and upper respiratory tract infection (seven [5%] vs nine [6%] vs six [4%]). The proportion of serious adverse events (ten [7%] vs nine [6%] vs 19 [13%]) and adverse events leading to discontinuation (six [4%] vs ten [6%] vs 17 [11%]) was lower in both upadacitinib groups than in the placebo group. Events of cancer, adjudicated major adverse cardiac events, or venous thromboembolism were reported infrequently. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION Upadacitinib demonstrated a positive efficacy and safety profile and could be an effective treatment option for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. FUNDING AbbVie.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology University Hospital Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Jesse Siffledeen
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Xavier Hébuterne
- Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, Université Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Geert D'Haens
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC campus AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hiroshi Nakase
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Julian Panés
- Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter D R Higgins
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Pascal Juillerat
- Gastroenterology, Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Edward V Loftus
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William J Sandborn
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Walter Reinisch
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Min-Hu Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Remo Panaccione
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wellens J, Brann S, Adams A, Marlow L, Lindsay JO, Satsangi JJ. Determinants of uptake of a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:507. [PMID: 35397229 PMCID: PMC8986165 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00120-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Wellens
- Translational Gastro-intestinal Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; Translational Research for Gastrointestinal Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Stephanie Brann
- Translational Gastro-intestinal Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Alex Adams
- Translational Gastro-intestinal Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Luke Marlow
- Translational Gastro-intestinal Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK; Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Jack J Satsangi
- Translational Gastro-intestinal Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ferrante M, Panaccione R, Baert F, Bossuyt P, Colombel JF, Danese S, Dubinsky M, Feagan BG, Hisamatsu T, Lim A, Lindsay JO, Loftus EV, Panés J, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Ran Z, Rubin DT, Sandborn WJ, Schreiber S, Neimark E, Song A, Kligys K, Pang Y, Pivorunas V, Berg S, Duan WR, Huang B, Kalabic J, Liao X, Robinson A, Wallace K, D'Haens G. Risankizumab as maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active Crohn's disease: results from the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal phase 3 FORTIFY maintenance trial. Lancet 2022; 399:2031-2046. [PMID: 35644155 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00466-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a great unmet need for new therapeutics with novel mechanisms of action for patients with Crohn's disease. The ADVANCE and MOTIVATE studies showed that intravenous risankizumab, a selective p19 anti-interleukin (IL)-23 antibody, was efficacious and well tolerated as induction therapy. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous risankizumab as maintenance therapy. METHODS FORTIFY is a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, maintenance withdrawal study across 273 clinical centres in 44 countries across North and South America, Europe, Oceania, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific region that enrolled participants with clinical response to risankizumab in the ADVANCE or MOTIVATE induction studies. Patients in ADVANCE or MOTIVATE were aged 16-80 years with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. Patients in the FORTIFY substudy 1 were randomly assigned again (1:1:1) to receive either subcutaneous risankizumab 180 mg, subcutaneous risankizumab 360 mg, or withdrawal from risankizumab to receive subcutaneous placebo (herein referred to as withdrawal [subcutaneous placebo]). Treatment was given every 8 weeks. Patients were stratified by induction dose, post-induction endoscopic response, and clinical remission status. Patients, investigators, and study personnel were masked to treatment assignments. Week 52 co-primary endpoints were clinical remission (Crohn's disease activity index [CDAI] in the US protocol, or stool frequency and abdominal pain score in the non-US protocol) and endoscopic response in patients who received at least one dose of study drug during the 52-week maintenance period. Safety was assessed in patients receiving at least one dose of study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03105102. FINDINGS 712 patients were initially assessed and, between April 9, 2018, and April 24, 2020, 542 patients were randomly assigned to either the risankizumab 180 mg group (n=179), the risankizumab 360 mg group (n=179), or the placebo group (n=184). Greater clinical remission and endoscopic response rates were reached with 360 mg risankizumab versus placebo (CDAI clinical remission was reached in 74 (52%) of 141 patients vs 67 (41%) of 164 patients, adjusted difference 15% [95% CI 5-24]; stool frequency and abdominal pain score clinical remission was reached in 73 (52%) of 141 vs 65 (40%) of 164, adjusted difference 15% [5-25]; endoscopic response 66 (47%) of 141 patients vs 36 (22%) of 164 patients, adjusted difference 28% [19-37]). Higher rates of CDAI clinical remission and endoscopic response (but not stool frequency and abdominal pain score clinical remission [p=0·124]) were also reached with risankizumab 180 mg versus withdrawal (subcutaneous placebo; CDAI clinical remission reached in 87 [55%] of 157 patients, adjusted difference 15% [95% CI 5-24]; endoscopic response 74 [47%] of 157, adjusted difference 26% [17-35]). Results for more stringent endoscopic and composite endpoints and inflammatory biomarkers were consistent with a dose-response relationship. Maintenance treatment was well tolerated. Adverse event rates were similar among groups, and the most frequently reported adverse events in all treatment groups were worsening Crohn's disease, arthralgia, and headache. INTERPRETATION Subcutaneous risankizumab is a safe and efficacious treatment for maintenance of remission in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and offers a new therapeutic option for a broad range of patients by meeting endpoints that might change the future course of disease. FUNDING AbbVie.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Peter Bossuyt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | | | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Brian G Feagan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Tadakazu Hisamatsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Allen Lim
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Edward V Loftus
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Julián Panés
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France; Department of Gastroenterology, University of Lorraine, Inserm, NGERE, Nancy, France
| | - Zhihua Ran
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Center, Shanghai, China; Renji Hospital School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Shanghai, China
| | - David T Rubin
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition and Digestive Diseases Center, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - William J Sandborn
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Geert D'Haens
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
D'Haens G, Panaccione R, Baert F, Bossuyt P, Colombel JF, Danese S, Dubinsky M, Feagan BG, Hisamatsu T, Lim A, Lindsay JO, Loftus EV, Panés J, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Ran Z, Rubin DT, Sandborn WJ, Schreiber S, Neimark E, Song A, Kligys K, Pang Y, Pivorunas V, Berg S, Duan WR, Huang B, Kalabic J, Liao X, Robinson A, Wallace K, Ferrante M. Risankizumab as induction therapy for Crohn's disease: results from the phase 3 ADVANCE and MOTIVATE induction trials. Lancet 2022; 399:2015-2030. [PMID: 35644154 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00467-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risankizumab, an interleukin (IL)-23 p19 inhibitor, was evaluated for safety and efficacy as induction therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. METHODS ADVANCE and MOTIVATE were randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 3 induction studies. Eligible patients aged 16-80 years with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease, previously showing intolerance or inadequate response to one or more approved biologics or conventional therapy (ADVANCE) or to biologics (MOTIVATE), were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of intravenous risankizumab (600 mg or 1200 mg) or placebo (2:2:1 in ADVANCE, 1:1:1 in MOTIVATE) at weeks 0, 4, and 8. We used interactive response technology for random assignment, with stratification by number of previous failed biologics, corticosteroid use at baseline, and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD). All patients and study personnel (excluding pharmacists who prepared intravenous solutions) were masked to treatment allocation throughout the study. Coprimary endpoints were clinical remission (defined by Crohn's disease activity index [CDAI] or patient-reported outcome criteria [average daily stool frequency and abdominal pain score]) and endoscopic response at week 12. The intention-to-treat population (all eligible patients who received at least one dose of study drug in the 12-week induction period) was analysed for efficacy outcomes. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Both trials were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03105128 (ADVANCE) and NCT03104413 (MOTIVATE), and are now complete. FINDINGS Participants were enrolled between May 10, 2017, and Aug 24, 2020 (ADVANCE trial), and Dec 18, 2017 and Sept 9, 2020 (MOTIVATE trial). In ADVANCE, 931 patients were assigned to either risankizumab 600 mg (n=373), risankizumab 1200 mg (n=372), or placebo (n=186). In MOTIVATE, 618 patients were assigned to risankizumab 600 mg (n=206), risankizumab 1200 mg (n=205), or placebo (n=207). The primary analysis population comprised 850 participants in ADVANCE and 569 participants in MOTIVATE. All coprimary endpoints at week 12 were met in both trials with both doses of risankizumab (p values ≤0·0001). In ADVANCE, CDAI clinical remission rate was 45% (adjusted difference 21%, 95% CI 12-29; 152/336) with risankizumab 600 mg and 42% (17%, 8-25; 141/339) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 25% (43/175) with placebo; stool frequency and abdominal pain score clinical remission rate was 43% (22%, 14-30; 146/336) with risankizumab 600 mg and 41% (19%, 11-27; 139/339) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 22% (38/175) with placebo; and endoscopic response rate was 40% (28%, 21-35; 135/336) with risankizumab 600 mg and 32% (20%, 14-27; 109/339) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 12% (21/175) with placebo. In MOTIVATE, CDAI clinical remission rate was 42% (22%, 13-31; 80/191) with risankizumab 600 mg and 40% (21%, 12-29; 77/191) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 20% (37/187) with placebo; stool frequency and abdominal pain score clinical remission rate was 35% (15%, 6-24; 66/191) with risankizumab 600 mg and 40% (20%, 12-29; 76/191) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 19% (36/187) with placebo; and endoscopic response rate was 29% (18%, 10-25; 55/191) with risankizumab 600 mg and 34% (23%, 15-31; 65/191) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 11% (21/187) with placebo. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar among the treatment groups in both trials. Three deaths occurred during induction (two in the placebo group [ADVANCE] and one in the risankizumab 1200 mg group [MOTIVATE]). The death in the risankizumab-treated patient was deemed unrelated to the study drug. INTERPRETATION Risankizumab was effective and well tolerated as induction therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. FUNDING AbbVie.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert D'Haens
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Peter Bossuyt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | | | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Brian G Feagan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada; Alimentiv, London, ON, Canada
| | - Tadakazu Hisamatsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Allen Lim
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Edward V Loftus
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Julian Panés
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- University of Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy, France; University of Lorraine, Inserm, NGERE, Nancy, France
| | - Zhihua Ran
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Center, Shanghai, China; Renji Hospital School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Shanghai, China
| | - David T Rubin
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition and Digestive Diseases Center, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - William J Sandborn
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marc Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Raine T, Pavey H, Qian W, Moran GW, Subramanian S, Swaby L, Travis SP, Din S, Irving PM, Lindsay JO, Parkes M, Kennedy NA. Establishment of a validated central reading system for ileocolonoscopy in an academic setting. Gut 2022; 71:661-664. [PMID: 35022265 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Holly Pavey
- Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Wendi Qian
- Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Gordon W Moran
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK
| | - Sreedhar Subramanian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lizzie Swaby
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, ScHARR, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Simon Pl Travis
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Shahida Din
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- IBD Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.,School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, London, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Miles Parkes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Curtius K, Kabir M, Al Bakir I, Choi CHR, Hartono JL, Johnson M, East JE, Lindsay JO, Vega R, Thomas-Gibson S, Warusavitarne J, Wilson A, Graham TA, Hart A. Multicentre derivation and validation of a colitis-associated colorectal cancer risk prediction web tool. Gut 2022; 71:705-715. [PMID: 33990383 PMCID: PMC8921573 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) diagnosed with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) have increased risk of developing advanced neoplasia (AN: high-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer). We aimed to develop and validate a predictor of AN risk in patients with UC with LGD and create a visual web tool to effectively communicate the risk. DESIGN In our retrospective multicentre validated cohort study, adult patients with UC with an index diagnosis of LGD, identified from four UK centres between 2001 and 2019, were followed until progression to AN. In the discovery cohort (n=246), a multivariate risk prediction model was derived from clinicopathological features using Cox regression. Validation used data from three external centres (n=198). The validated model was embedded in a web tool to calculate patient-specific risk. RESULTS Four clinicopathological variables were significantly associated with AN progression in the discovery cohort: endoscopically visible LGD >1 cm (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.2 to 5.9), unresectable or incomplete endoscopic resection (HR 3.4; 95% CI 1.6 to 7.4), moderate/severe histological inflammation within 5 years of LGD diagnosis (HR 3.1; 95% CI 1.5 to 6.7) and multifocality (HR 2.9; 95% CI 1.3 to 6.2). In the validation cohort, this four-variable model accurately predicted future AN cases with overall calibration Observed/Expected=1.01 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.52), and achieved 100% specificity for the lowest risk group over 13 years of available follow-up. CONCLUSION Multicohort validation confirms that patients with large, unresected, multifocal LGD and recent moderate/severe inflammation are at highest risk of developing AN. Personalised risk prediction provided via the Ulcerative Colitis-Cancer Risk Estimator ( www.UC-CaRE.uk ) can support treatment decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kit Curtius
- Centre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Misha Kabir
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Ibrahim Al Bakir
- Centre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Chang Ho Ryan Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Juanda L Hartono
- Division of Gastroenterology, National University Hospital, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Michael Johnson
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Roser Vega
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Siwan Thomas-Gibson
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Janindra Warusavitarne
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Colorectal Surgery and Lennard-Jones Intestinal Failure Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Ana Wilson
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Trevor A Graham
- Centre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ailsa Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hornsby E, King HW, Peiris M, Buccafusca R, Lee WYJ, Wing ES, Blackshaw LA, Lindsay JO, Stagg AJ. The cation channel TRPM8 influences the differentiation and function of human monocytes. J Leukoc Biol 2022; 112:365-381. [PMID: 35233801 PMCID: PMC9543907 DOI: 10.1002/jlb.1hi0421-181r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Monocytes are mononuclear phagocytes that can differentiate to a variety of cell fates under the influence of their microenvironment and hardwired commitment. We found that inhibition of TRPM8 in human blood CD14+ monocytes during a critical 3‐h window at the beginning of their differentiation into macrophages led to enhanced survival and LPS‐driven TNFα production after 24 h. TRPM8 antagonism also promoted LPS‐driven TNFα production in CD14+ monocytes derived from the intestinal mucosa. Macrophages that had been derived for 6 days under blockade of TRPM8 had impaired phagocytic capacity and were transcriptionally distinct. Most of the affected genes were altered in a way that opposed normal monocyte to macrophage differentiation indicating that TRPM8 activity promotes aspects of this differentiation programme. Thus, we reveal a novel role for TRPM8 in regulating human CD14+ monocyte fate and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Hornsby
- Centre for Immunobiology & Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Hamish W King
- Centre for Immunobiology & Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Madusha Peiris
- Centre for Neuroscience & Trauma, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Roberto Buccafusca
- School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK
| | - Wing-Yiu Jason Lee
- Centre for Immunobiology & Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Elinor S Wing
- Centre for Immunobiology & Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - L Ashley Blackshaw
- Centre for Neuroscience & Trauma, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology & Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, UK
| | - Andrew J Stagg
- Centre for Immunobiology & Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
McCartney S, Lindsay JO, Russell RK, Gaya DR, Shaw I, Murray CD, Finney-Hayward T, Sebastian S. Benefits of Structured Pediatric to Adult Transition in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The TRANSIT Observational Study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2022; 74:208-214. [PMID: 34694262 PMCID: PMC8788940 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000003244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of structured transition from pediatric to adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) services on objective patient outcomes, including disease flares, admission rates, and healthcare resource use. METHODS A retrospective observational study in 11 United Kingdom gastroenterology centers. Transition patients attended ≥2 visits to the gastroenterology service with both pediatric and adult personnel jointly present; non-transition patients transferred to adult services without joint visits. Data were collected from medical records for the 12-month periods before and after the date of the first visit involving adult IBD services (index visit). RESULTS A total of 129 patients were included: 95 transition patients and 34 non-transition patients. In the 12 months post-index visit, transition patients had fewer disease flares (P = 0.05), were more likely to be steroid-free (71% vs 41%, P < 0.05), and were less likely to have an emergency department visit leading to hospital admission (5% vs 18%, P < 0.05). During this period, the mean estimated overall cost of care per patient was £1644.22 in the transition group and £1827.32 in the non-transition group (P = 0.21). CONCLUSION Structured transition from pediatric to adult IBD care services was associated with positive and cost-neutral outcomes in patients with pediatric IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara McCartney
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | - Ian Shaw
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cox SR, Clarke H, O'Keeffe M, Dubois P, Irving PM, Lindsay JO, Whelan K. Nutrient, Fibre, and FODMAP Intakes and Food-related Quality of Life in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Their Relationship with Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Differing Aetiologies. J Crohns Colitis 2021; 15:2041-2053. [PMID: 34216206 PMCID: PMC8684455 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Certain foods are reported as gut symptom triggers in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], and fructans are shown to worsen non-inflammatory symptoms in inactive IBD, which may result in self-imposed dietary restrictions. The aim of this study was to investigate nutrient and FODMAP intakes, and the relationship between gut symptoms and dietary intake, in IBD. METHODS Nutrient, fibre, and FODMAP intakes were estimated using 7-day food records in patients with active IBD [Active IBD], inactive IBD with non-inflammatory gut symptoms [Inactive IBD-GI], inactive IBD without gut symptoms [Inactive IBD], and healthy controls. Nutrient intakes, numbers of participants achieving national recommendations, and food-related quality of life [FR-QoL] were compared across study groups. RESULTS Food diaries were obtained from 232 patients with IBD [65 Active IBD, 86 Inactive IBD-GI, 81 Inactive IBD] and 84 healthy controls. Patients with Active IBD had significantly lower intakes of numerous micronutrients, including iron, folate, and vitamin C, compared with controls. All IBD groups consumed less total fibre [4.5 to 5.8 g/day] than controls [p = 0.001], and total FODMAP and fructan intakes were lower in Active IBD compared with controls. Strikingly, FR-QoL was significantly lower in all IBD groups compared with controls [all p = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed lower intakes of fibre, FODMAPs, and micronutrients, in addition to poorer FR-QoL, in Active IBD and Inactive IBD-GI with gut symptoms compared with healthy controls. Future research should address dietary restrictions responsible for these differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selina R Cox
- King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, UK
| | - Hazel Clarke
- King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, UK
| | - Majella O'Keeffe
- King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, UK
| | - Patrick Dubois
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Barts Health NHS Trust, Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital , London, UK
| | - Kevin Whelan
- King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
McGregor CG, Adams A, Sadler R, Arancibia-Cárcamo CV, Palmer R, Ambrose T, Brain O, Walsh A, Klenerman P, Travis SP, Croft NM, Lindsay JO, Satsangi J. Maintenance therapy with infliximab or vedolizumab in IBD is not associated with increased SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence: UK experience in the 2020 pandemic. Gut 2021; 70:2398-2400. [PMID: 33579788 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen Gc McGregor
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alex Adams
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ross Sadler
- Department of Laboratory Immunology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Carolina V Arancibia-Cárcamo
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rebecca Palmer
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tim Ambrose
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Oliver Brain
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alissa Walsh
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Klenerman
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Simon Pl Travis
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicholas M Croft
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Departments of Gastroenterology and Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Departments of Gastroenterology and Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jack Satsangi
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Panés J, Lindsay JO, Teich N, Lindgren S, Colombel JF, Flynn HA, Huyck S, Yao R, Philip G, Reinisch W. Colectomy Incidence Rates in Five-Year Data From the Observational Postmarketing Ulcerative Colitis Study of Originator Infliximab. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021; 27:1963-1967. [PMID: 33577644 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izab026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This analysis of the Observational Postmarketing Ulcerative Colitis Study examined incidence rates of colectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis who received originator infliximab (IFX) or conventional therapies (ConvRx) as per their treating physician. METHODS Cox proportional hazards models compared time to colectomy for both treatment groups. A secondary analysis examined colectomy incidence rates based on IFX exposure timing (defined by a 90-day window after the last IFX dose date). RESULTS Of 2239 patients with data, 1059 enrolled in IFX and 1180 enrolled in ConvRx (including 296 patients who switched to IFX). Patients in the IFX group had more severe disease at baseline vs the ConvRx group (percentage with baseline partial Mayo score 7-9: 46.0% vs 30.5%, respectively). During 5 years of follow-up, 271 patients (12.1% of enrolled patients) had colectomy. Enrollment in the IFX group was associated with a higher risk of colectomy (hazard ratio = 3.12; 95% confidence interval, 2.25-4.34; P < 0.001) compared with enrollment in the ConvRx group. A total of 174 colectomies occurred in the IFX group, but 97 of these colectomies occurred ≥90 days after the last IFX dose date. CONCLUSIONS Colectomy was reported at a higher rate in the IFX group than in the ConvRx group, although patients in the IFX group had more severe disease at baseline and most of the colectomies occurred after patients had been off of IFX for ≥90 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julián Panés
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James O Lindsay
- The Royal London, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Niels Teich
- Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Leipzig, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, Jena University, Jena, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Susan Huyck
- Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ruji Yao
- Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Alexander T, Snowden JA, Burman J, Chang HD, Del Papa N, Farge D, Lindsay JO, Malard F, Muraro PA, Nitti R, Salas A, Sharrack B, Mohty M, Greco R. Intestinal Microbiome in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation For Autoimmune Diseases: Considerations and Perspectives on Behalf of Autoimmune Diseases Working Party (ADWP) of the EBMT. Front Oncol 2021; 11:722436. [PMID: 34745944 PMCID: PMC8569851 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.722436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past decades, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been evolving as specific treatment for patients with severe and refractory autoimmune diseases (ADs), where mechanistic studies have provided evidence for a profound immune renewal facilitating the observed beneficial responses. The intestinal microbiome plays an important role in host physiology including shaping the immune repertoire. The relationships between intestinal microbiota composition and outcomes after HSCT for hematologic diseases have been identified, particularly for predicting the mortality from infectious and non-infectious causes. Furthermore, therapeutic manipulations of the gut microbiota, such as fecal microbiota transplant (FMT), have emerged as promising therapeutic approaches for restoring the functional and anatomical integrity of the intestinal microbiota post-transplantation. Although changes in the intestinal microbiome have been linked to various ADs, studies investigating the effect of intestinal dysbiosis on HSCT outcomes for ADs are scarce and require further attention. Herein, we describe some of the landmark microbiome studies in HSCT recipients and patients with chronic ADs, and discuss the challenges and opportunities of microbiome research for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in the context of HSCT for ADs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Alexander
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology - Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and the Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ Berlin) - a Leibniz Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - John A Snowden
- Department of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.,Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Joachim Burman
- Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Hyun-Dong Chang
- Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ Berlin) - a Leibniz Institute, Berlin, Germany.,Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Dominique Farge
- Unité de Médecine Interne: (UF 04) CRMR MATHEC, Maladies Auto-Immunes et Thérapie Cellulaire, Paris, France.,Universite de Paris, IRSL, Recherche Clinique Appliquee `à l'´hématologie, Paris, France.,Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Florent Malard
- Service d'hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Saint Antoine, APHP, Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMRs 938, Paris, France
| | - Paolo A Muraro
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rosamaria Nitti
- Unit of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Basil Sharrack
- Department of Neuroscience, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS, Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.,NIHR Neurosciences Biomedical Research Centre, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamad Mohty
- Service d'hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Saint Antoine, APHP, Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMRs 938, Paris, France
| | - Raffaella Greco
- Unit of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wilson B, Eyice Ö, Koumoutsos I, Lomer MC, Irving PM, Lindsay JO, Whelan K. Prebiotic Galactooligosaccharide Supplementation in Adults with Ulcerative Colitis: Exploring the Impact on Peripheral Blood Gene Expression, Gut Microbiota, and Clinical Symptoms. Nutrients 2021; 13:nu13103598. [PMID: 34684597 PMCID: PMC8537576 DOI: 10.3390/nu13103598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Prebiotics may promote immune homeostasis and reduce sub-clinical inflammation in humans. This study investigated the effect of prebiotic galactooligosaccharide (GOS) supplementation in colonic inflammation. Seventeen patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) consumed 2.8 g/d GOS for 6 weeks. At baseline and 6 weeks, gene expression (microarray), fecal calprotectin (ELISA), microbiota (16S rRNA), short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs; gas-liquid chromatography), and clinical outcomes (simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI), gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS), and Bristol stool form scale (BSFS)) were measured. Following prebiotics, clinical scores (SCCAI), fecal calprotectin, SCFAs, and pH were unchanged. Five genes were upregulated and two downregulated. Normal stool proportion (BSFS) increased (49% vs. 70%, p = 0.024), and the incidence (46% vs. 23%, p = 0.016) and severity (0.7 vs. 0.5, p = 0.048) of loose stool (GSRS), along with urgency (SCCAI) scores (1.0 vs. 0.5, p = 0.011), were reduced. In patients with a baseline SCCAI ≤2, prebiotics increased the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium from 1.65% (1.97) to 3.99% (5.37) (p = 0.046) and Christensenellaceae from 0.13% (0.33) to 0.31% (0.76) (p = 0.043). Prebiotics did not lower clinical scores or inflammation but normalized stools. Bifidobacterium and Christensenellaceae proportions only increased in patients with less active diseases, indicating that the prebiotic effect may depend on disease activity. A controlled study is required to validate these observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridgette Wilson
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK; (B.W.); (M.C.L.) (P.M.I.)
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Özge Eyice
- School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK;
| | - Ioannis Koumoutsos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK;
| | - Miranda C. Lomer
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK; (B.W.); (M.C.L.) (P.M.I.)
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK;
| | - Peter M. Irving
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK; (B.W.); (M.C.L.) (P.M.I.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK;
| | - James O. Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK;
- Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London E1 2AT, UK
| | - Kevin Whelan
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK; (B.W.); (M.C.L.) (P.M.I.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-(0)207-848-3858
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hedin CR, McCarthy NE, Louis P, Farquharson FM, McCartney S, Stagg AJ, Lindsay JO, Whelan K. Prebiotic fructans have greater impact on luminal microbiology and CD3+ T cells in healthy siblings than patients with Crohn's disease: A pilot study investigating the potential for primary prevention of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Nutr 2021; 40:5009-5019. [PMID: 34364241 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Siblings of people with Crohn's disease (CD) share aspects of the disease phenotype (raised faecal calprotectin, altered microbiota), which are markers of risk for their own development of CD. The aim was to determine whether supplementation with prebiotic oligofructose/inulin induces a prebiotic response and impacts the risk phenotype in CD patients and siblings. METHODS Patients with inactive CD (n = 19, CD activity index <150) and 12 of their unaffected siblings (with calprotectin >50 μg/g) ingested oligofructose/inulin (15 g/day) for three weeks. Faecal microbiota (qPCR), intestinal permeability (lactulose-rhamnose test), blood T cells (flow-cytometry) and calprotectin (ELISA) were measured at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS Following oligofructose/inulin, calprotectin did not significantly change in patients (baseline mean 537 SD 535 μg/g; follow-up mean 974 SD 1318 μg/g, p = 0.08) or siblings (baseline mean 73 SD 90 μg/g: follow up mean 58 SD 72 μg/g, p = 0.62). Faecal Bifidobacteria and Bifidobacterium longum increased in patients and siblings; Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Roseburia spp. increased only in siblings. Compared with patients, siblings had a greater magnitude change in Bifidobacteria (+14.6% vs +0.4%, p = 0.028), B. adolescentis (+1.1% vs 0.0% p = 0.006) and Roseburia spp. (+1.5% vs -0.1% p = 0.004). Intestinal permeability decreased significantly in patients after oligofructose/inulin to a level that was similar to siblings. Blood T cell abundance reduced in siblings but not patients following oligofructose/inulin. CONCLUSIONS Oligofructose/inulin supplementation did not significantly impact calprotectin, but the prebiotic effect was more marked in healthy siblings compared with patients with inactive CD and was associated with alterations in other CD risk markers. Future research should focus on dietary intervention, including with prebiotics, in the primary prevention of CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte R Hedin
- King's College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, UK; Queen Mary University of London, Blizard Institute, Centre for Immunobiology, London, UK
| | - Neil E McCarthy
- Queen Mary University of London, Blizard Institute, Centre for Immunobiology, London, UK
| | - Petra Louis
- Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Microbiology Group, Gut Health Theme, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Freda M Farquharson
- Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Microbiology Group, Gut Health Theme, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sara McCartney
- University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department for Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, London, UK
| | - Andrew J Stagg
- Queen Mary University of London, Blizard Institute, Centre for Immunobiology, London, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Queen Mary University of London, Blizard Institute, Centre for Immunobiology, London, UK; Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Kevin Whelan
- King's College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bancil AS, Sandall AM, Rossi M, Chassaing B, Lindsay JO, Whelan K. Food Additive Emulsifiers and Their Impact on Gut Microbiome, Permeability, and Inflammation: Mechanistic Insights in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2021; 15:1068-1079. [PMID: 33336247 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The global burden of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] has increased over the 21st century. Despite multiple studies investigating the pathogenesis of IBD, the causative mechanisms pertaining to its increased prevalence remain unclear. There is growing evidence that aspects of a 'Western diet' increase the risk of developing IBD. More recently, evidence implicating dietary emulsifiers has accumulated, with ecological studies showing a positive correlation between inflammatory bowel disease and emulsifier consumption. Further to these, cell and animal studies have demonstrated plausible mechanisms by which dietary emulsifiers may contribute to IBD pathogenesis through mechanisms including: promotion of pro-inflammatory intestinal microbiota; disruption of mucus architecture; increased intestinal permeability; activation of inflammatory pathways; and disruption of the cell cycle. This review critically analyses the current evidence for these mechanisms that may be of pathological relevance to IBD, evaluates recent dietary trials, acknowledges the challenges of dietary intervention studies, and gives an overview of ongoing and future clinical trials in this important area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron S Bancil
- King's College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, UK
| | - Alicia M Sandall
- King's College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, UK
| | - Megan Rossi
- King's College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, UK
| | - Benoit Chassaing
- INSERM U1016, CNRS UMR 8104, Université de Paris, Paris, France.,Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Center for Inflammation, Immunity and Infection, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - James O Lindsay
- Queen Mary University of London, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kevin Whelan
- King's College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Whelan K, Murrells T, Morgan M, Cummings F, Stansfield C, Todd A, Sebastian S, Lobo A, Lomer MCE, Lindsay JO, Czuber-Dochan W. Food-related quality of life is impaired in inflammatory bowel disease and associated with reduced intake of key nutrients. Am J Clin Nutr 2021; 113:832-844. [PMID: 33677550 DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may impact the extent to which food, eating, and drinking bring satisfaction and enjoyment to peoples' lives, and this may impact dietary intake. The prevalence of an impaired food-related quality of life (FR-QoL), its associated factors, and its impact on diet have not been explored. OBJECTIVES To measure the prevalence and nature of the burden of impaired FR-QoL in people with IBD, the factors associated with these, and their associations with nutrient intake. METHODS We recruited 1576 outpatients with IBD (≥16 years old) in person from 7 IBD centers across the United Kingdom. Patients completed validated questionnaires to measure their FR-QoL, quality of life (QoL), distress, fatigue, anxiety, and depression. Dietary intake was recorded using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer FFQ. A health professional recorded disease activity, Montreal classification, blood results, BMI, and malnutrition risk. FR-QoL was regressed onto explanatory variables using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS Data from 1221 patients were available (77.4% response; Crohn's disease, 65%; ulcerative colitis, 35%). The FR-QoL mean (± SD) score was 80.8 ± 26.9, with wide ranges (minimum, 29; maximum, 145). Following multivariable regression, the strongest associations with FR-QoL were the number of recent disease flares (5 flares β = -12.7; P < 0.001), the IBD-specific QoL (β = 0.33; P < 0.001), and IBD-related distress (β = -0.26; P < 0.001). Patients with poorer FR-QoL had lower intakes of fiber (nonstarch polysaccharide; Q1 to Q5 difference = 2.1 g/d; 95% CI: 0.4-3.8; P = 0.048), calcium (192.6 mg/d; 95% CI: 112.5-272.6; P < 0.001), phosphorus (167 mg/d; 95% CI: 58-276; P = 0.041), and magnesium (34.4 mg/d; 95% CI: 9.3-59.4; P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS Impaired FR-QoL is prevalent in IBD and is associated with recurrent disease flares, a reduced IBD-specific QoL, and greater IBD-related distress. A poorer FR-QoL was associated with lower intakes of key nutrients of importance to IBD, including those relating to gut health and bone mineralization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Whelan
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Trevor Murrells
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery, and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Myfanwy Morgan
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Fraser Cummings
- University Southampton Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anne Todd
- NHS Forth Valley, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, United Kingdom
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
- Hull York Medical School, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Lobo
- Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Miranda C E Lomer
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - James O Lindsay
- Bart's Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Queen Mary University of London, Blizard Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wladyslawa Czuber-Dochan
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery, and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Alexander JL, Moran GW, Gaya DR, Raine T, Hart A, Kennedy NA, Lindsay JO, MacDonald J, Segal JP, Sebastian S, Selinger CP, Parkes M, Smith PJ, Dhar A, Subramanian S, Arasaradnam R, Lamb CA, Ahmad T, Lees CW, Dobson L, Wakeman R, Iqbal TH, Arnott I, Powell N. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a British Society of Gastroenterology Inflammatory Bowel Disease section and IBD Clinical Research Group position statement. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:218-224. [PMID: 33508241 PMCID: PMC7834976 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00024-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global health crisis and mass vaccination programmes provide the best opportunity for controlling transmission and protecting populations. Despite the impressive clinical trial results of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford/AstraZeneca), and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines, important unanswered questions remain, especially in patients with pre-existing conditions. In this position statement endorsed by the British Society of Gastroenterology Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) section and IBD Clinical Research Group, we consider SARS-CoV-2 vaccination strategy in patients with IBD. The risks of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are anticipated to be very low, and we strongly support SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with IBD. Based on data from previous studies with other vaccines, there are conceptual concerns that protective immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination may be diminished in some patients with IBD, such as those taking anti-TNF drugs. However, the benefits of vaccination, even in patients treated with anti-TNF drugs, are likely to outweigh these theoretical concerns. Key areas for further research are discussed, including vaccine hesitancy and its effect in the IBD community, the effect of immunosuppression on vaccine efficacy, and the search for predictive biomarkers of vaccine success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Alexander
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Gordon W Moran
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre at Nottingham University Hospitals and The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Daniel R Gaya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK,Department of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ailsa Hart
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK,Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan MacDonald
- Department of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jonathan P Segal
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- IBD Unit, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | | | - Miles Parkes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philip J Smith
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anjan Dhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Durham, UK
| | - Sreedhar Subramanian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ramesh Arasaradnam
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Christopher A Lamb
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK,Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Charlie W Lees
- Institute of Genetic and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Tariq H Iqbal
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ian Arnott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nick Powell
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK,Correspondence to: Dr Nick Powell, 10th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kim H, Alten R, Cummings F, Danese S, D'Haens G, Emery P, Ghosh S, Gilletta de Saint Joseph C, Lee J, Lindsay JO, Nikiphorou E, Parker B, Schreiber S, Simoens S, Westhovens R, Jeong JH, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Innovative approaches to biologic development on the trail of CT-P13: biosimilars, value-added medicines, and biobetters. MAbs 2021; 13:1868078. [PMID: 33557682 PMCID: PMC7889098 DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2020.1868078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The biosimilar concept is now well established. Clinical data accumulated pre- and post-approval have supported biosimilar uptake, in turn stimulating competition in the biologics market and increasing patient access to biologics. Following technological advances, other innovative biologics, such as “biobetters” or “value-added medicines,” are now reaching the market. These innovative biologics differ from the reference product by offering additional clinical or non-clinical benefits. We discuss these innovative biologics with reference to CT-P13, initially available as an intravenous (IV) biosimilar of reference infliximab. A subcutaneous (SC) formulation, CT-P13 SC, has now been developed. Relative to CT-P13 IV, CT-P13 SC offers clinical benefits in terms of pharmacokinetics, with comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity, as well as increased convenience for patients and reduced demands on healthcare system resources. As was once the case for biosimilars, nomenclature and regulatory pathways for innovative biologics require clarification to support their uptake and ultimately benefit patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HoUng Kim
- Celltrion Healthcare , Incheon, Republic of Korea.,Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University , Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Rieke Alten
- Rheumatology Research Center, Schlosspark-Klinik Charité, University Medicine Berlin , Berlin, Germany
| | - Fraser Cummings
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust , Southampton, UK
| | - Silvio Danese
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Milan, Italy
| | - Geert D'Haens
- Department of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Amsterdam University Medical Centers , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, The Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds , UK
| | - Subrata Ghosh
- The Institute of Translational Medicine, Immunology and Immunotherapy, NIHR BRC, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, UK
| | | | - JongHyuk Lee
- Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, College of Life and Health Science, Hoseo University , Asan, Republic of Korea
| | - James O Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust , London, UK
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College, London, and Rheumatology Department, King's College Hospital , London, UK
| | - Ben Parker
- Kellgren Centre for Rheumatology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre , Manchester, UK
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department of Medicine I, Christian-Albrechts-University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein , Kiel, Germany
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rene Westhovens
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center , Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ji Hoon Jeong
- Department of Global Innovative Drugs, Graduate School of Chung-Ang University and Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University , Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital , Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France.,Inserm U1256 NGERE, Lorraine University , Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Staudacher HM, Scholz M, Lomer MC, Ralph FS, Irving PM, Lindsay JO, Fava F, Tuohy K, Whelan K. Gut microbiota associations with diet in irritable bowel syndrome and the effect of low FODMAP diet and probiotics. Clin Nutr 2020; 40:1861-1870. [PMID: 33183883 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Diet is both a modulator of the gastrointestinal microbiota and an important therapy in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to comprehensively (i) identify diet-microbiota associations in adults with IBS consuming habitual diet; (ii) assess the impact of two nutritional interventions on the microbiota; and (iii) determine whether baseline microbiota can predict clinical response to diet or probiotic intervention. METHODS Data were analyzed from 95 individuals with IBS participating in a previously published 4-week 2x2 factorial design randomized controlled trial investigating the impact of the low FODMAP diet (LFD) and co-administration of a probiotic. Diet was assessed at four hierarchical levels and partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to profile the microbiota. RESULTS There were numerous diet-microbiota associations especially at the nutrient level, including a negative association between protein and Bifidobacterium abundance (rs = -0.358, p < 0.001). After correction for multiple testing, the significance for this association (q = 0.237) and all others was lost. Low FODMAP diet led to changes in abundance of major saccharolytic genera compared with sham diet, including higher Bacteroides (LFD 34.1% (15.7%) vs sham 23.3% (15.2%), q = 0.01) and lower Bifidobacterium (0.9% (1.0%) vs 2.1%, (2.5%) q = 0.029). Compared with placebo, probiotic supplementation led to higher Lactobacillus (probiotic 0.08% (0.1%) vs placebo 0.03% (0.2%), q < 0.001), and Streptococcus abundance (2.0% (2.2%) vs 0.6% (1.2%), q = 0.001). The probiotic treatment buffered the impact of the low FODMAP diet on Bifidobacterium. Baseline microbiota did not predict clinical response to either intervention. CONCLUSIONS Although diet modifies the gut microbiota, bivariate correlation analysis may only provide a limited explanation of the complex diet interactions with individual gut bacteria in IBS. Some diet interventions modify the microbiota in IBS. TRIAL REGISTRY ISRCTN (http://www.isrctn.com) Registered under ISRCTN registry identifier no.ISRCTN02275221.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi M Staudacher
- King's College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthias Scholz
- Research and Innovation Centre, Department of Food Quality and Nutrition, Nutrition and Nutrigenomics Group, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Trento, Italy
| | - Miranda Ce Lomer
- King's College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, United Kingdom; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Frances S Ralph
- King's College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter M Irving
- King's College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, United Kingdom; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Barts Health NHS Trust, Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, London, UK; Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Immunobiology, London, UK
| | - Francesca Fava
- Research and Innovation Centre, Department of Food Quality and Nutrition, Nutrition and Nutrigenomics Group, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Trento, Italy
| | - Kieran Tuohy
- Research and Innovation Centre, Department of Food Quality and Nutrition, Nutrition and Nutrigenomics Group, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Trento, Italy
| | - Kevin Whelan
- King's College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Din S, Kent A, Pollok RC, Meade S, Kennedy NA, Arnott I, Beattie RM, Chua F, Cooney R, Dart RJ, Galloway J, Gaya DR, Ghosh S, Griffiths M, Hancock L, Hansen R, Hart A, Lamb CA, Lees CW, Limdi JK, Lindsay JO, Patel K, Powell N, Murray CD, Probert C, Raine T, Selinger C, Sebastian S, Smith PJ, Tozer P, Ustianowski A, Younge L, Samaan MA, Irving PM. Adaptations to the British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of acute severe UC in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a RAND appropriateness panel. Gut 2020; 69:1769-1777. [PMID: 32513653 PMCID: PMC7299646 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Management of acute severe UC (ASUC) during the novel COVID-19 pandemic presents significant dilemmas. We aimed to provide COVID-19-specific guidance using current British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines as a reference point. DESIGN We convened a RAND appropriateness panel comprising 14 gastroenterologists and an IBD nurse consultant supplemented by surgical and COVID-19 experts. Panellists rated the appropriateness of interventions for ASUC in the context of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Median scores and disagreement index (DI) were calculated. Results were discussed at a moderated meeting prior to a second survey. RESULTS Panellists recommended that patients with ASUC should be isolated throughout their hospital stay and should have a SARS-CoV-2 swab performed on admission. Patients with a positive swab should be discussed with COVID-19 specialists. As per BSG guidance, intravenous hydrocortisone was considered appropriate as initial management; only in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was its use deemed uncertain. In patients requiring rescue therapy, infliximab with continuing steroids was recommended. Delaying colectomy because of COVID-19 was deemed inappropriate. Steroid tapering as per BSG guidance was deemed appropriate for all patients apart from those with COVID-19 pneumonia in whom a 4-6 week taper was preferred. Post-ASUC maintenance therapy was dependent on SARS-CoV-2 status but, in general, biologics were more likely to be deemed appropriate than azathioprine or tofacitinib. Panellists deemed prophylactic anticoagulation postdischarge to be appropriate in patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 swab. CONCLUSION We have suggested COVID-19-specific adaptations to the BSG ASUC guideline using a RAND panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahida Din
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alexandra Kent
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Richard C Pollok
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Susanna Meade
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and Saint Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
- Exeter IBD Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Ian Arnott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - R Mark Beattie
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Felix Chua
- Interstitial Lung Disease Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rachel Cooney
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robin J Dart
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - James Galloway
- Department of Rheumatology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Daniel R Gaya
- Gastroenterology Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Subrata Ghosh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mark Griffiths
- Peri-operative Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK
| | - Laura Hancock
- Department of General Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Hansen
- Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ailsa Hart
- IBD Unit, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
- Antigen Presentation Research Group, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Christopher Andrew Lamb
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Charlie W Lees
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kamal Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nick Powell
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Chris Probert
- Gastroenterology Research Unit, Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, University of Liverpool Institute of Translational Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christian Selinger
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
- Department of Immunuology and Inflammation, Hull York Medical School, Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK
| | - Philip J Smith
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Phil Tozer
- IBD Unit, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Andrew Ustianowski
- Department of Infectious Disease, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Lisa Younge
- IBD Unit, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
- Crohn's and Colitis UK, Saint Albans, UK
| | - Mark A Samaan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and Saint Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and Saint Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dotan I, Panaccione R, Kaplan GG, O’Morain C, Lindsay JO, Abreu MT. Best Practice Guidance for Adult Infusion Centres during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Report from the COVID-19 International Organization for the Study of IBD [IOIBD] Task Force. J Crohns Colitis 2020; 14:S785-S790. [PMID: 32959882 PMCID: PMC7543377 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Infusion centres are a central part in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] and could be a source of transmission of SARS-COV-2. Here we aimed to develop global guidance for best practices of infusion centres for IBD patients and to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these centres. Under the auspices of the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease [IOIBD], a task force [TF] was formed, an online survey was developed to query infusion centre protocols during COVID-19, and recommendations were made, based on TF experience and opinion. Recommendations focus mainly on patients screening, infusion centres re-organization, personnel protection, and protocol modifications such as shortening infusion duration or replacing it with subcutaneous alternatives. Implementing these recommendations will hopefully reduce exposure of both IBD patients and care givers to SARS-COV-2 and improve the function and safety of infusion centres during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as potential future threats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Dotan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Gilaad G Kaplan
- Research and Welness Building, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Colm O’Morain
- National Lead in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beacon Hospital, Sandyford, Dublin, Ireland
| | - James O Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel, London, UK
| | - Maria T Abreu
- Crohn’s and Colitis Center, Professor of Medicine, Professor of Microbiology and Immunology, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - IOIBD
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sandall AM, Cox SR, Lindsay JO, Gewirtz AT, Chassaing B, Rossi M, Whelan K. Emulsifiers Impact Colonic Length in Mice and Emulsifier Restriction is Feasible in People with Crohn's Disease. Nutrients 2020; 12:nu12092827. [PMID: 32942699 PMCID: PMC7551245 DOI: 10.3390/nu12092827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There is an association between food additive emulsifiers and the prevalence of Crohn’s disease. This study aimed to investigate: (i) the effect of different classes of emulsifiers on markers of intestinal inflammation in mice and (ii) the feasibility, nutritional adequacy and symptom impact of restricting all emulsifier classes in Crohn’s disease. Mice were exposed to different classes of emulsifiers (carboxymethycellose, polysorbate-80, soy lecithin, gum arabic) in drinking water for 12-weeks, after which markers of inflammation and metabolism were measured. A low emulsifier diet was developed to restrict all classes of emulsifiers and its feasibility measured over 14-days in 20 participants with stable Crohn’s disease. Crohn’s disease-related symptoms, disease control, body weight and composition, nutrient intake and food-related quality of life (QoL) were measured. All emulsifiers resulted in lower murine colonic length compared with control (mean 9.5 cm (SEM 0.20)), but this only reached significance for polysorbate-80 (8.2 cm (0.34), p = 0.024) and carboxymethylcellulose (8.0 cm (0.35), p = 0.013). All 20 participants completed the feasibility study. The frequency of consuming emulsifier-containing foods decreased by 94.6% (SD 10.3%). Food-related QoL improved between habitual (median 81.5 (IQR 25.0)) and low emulsifier diet (90.0 (24.0), p = 0.028). Crohn’s disease-related symptoms reduced (median 3.0 (IQR 5.3) vs. 1.4 (3.9), p = 0.006), and disease control scores improved (13.5 (IQR 6.0) vs. 15.5 (IQR 3.0), p = 0.026). A range of emulsifiers may influence intestinal inflammation in mice, and dietary restriction of emulsifiers is feasible. Trials investigating the efficacy of a low emulsifier diet in Crohn’s disease are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia M. Sandall
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK; (A.M.S.); (S.R.C.); (M.R.)
| | - Selina R. Cox
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK; (A.M.S.); (S.R.C.); (M.R.)
| | - James O. Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK;
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, UK
| | - Andrew T. Gewirtz
- Centre for Inflammation, Immunity and Infection, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA; (A.T.G.); (B.C.)
| | - Benoit Chassaing
- Centre for Inflammation, Immunity and Infection, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA; (A.T.G.); (B.C.)
- Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
- INSERM, U1016, Team “Mucosal microbiota in chronic inflammatory diseases”, 75006 Paris, France
- Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Megan Rossi
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK; (A.M.S.); (S.R.C.); (M.R.)
| | - Kevin Whelan
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London SE1 9NH, UK; (A.M.S.); (S.R.C.); (M.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-(0)-207-848-3858
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Powell N, Ibraheim H, Raine T, Speight RA, Papa S, Brain O, Green M, Samaan MA, Spain L, Yousaf N, Hunter N, Eldridge L, Pavlidis P, Irving P, Hayee B, Turajlic S, Larkin J, Lindsay JO, Gore M. British Society of Gastroenterology endorsed guidance for the management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5:679-697. [PMID: 32553146 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30014-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a novel class of cancer treatment that have improved outcomes for a subset of cancer patients. They work by antagonising inhibitory immune pathways, thereby augmenting immune-mediated antitumour responses. However, immune activation is not cancer-specific and often results in the activation of immune cells in non-cancer tissues, resulting in off-target immune-mediated injury and organ dysfunction. Diarrhoea and gastrointestinal tract inflammation are common and sometimes serious side-effects of this type of therapy. Prompt recognition of gastrointestinal toxicity and, in many cases, rapid institution of anti-inflammatory or biologic therapy (or both) is required to reverse these complications. Management of organ-specific complications benefits from multidisciplinary input, including engagement with gastroenterologists for optimal management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis. In this British Society of Gastroenterology endorsed guidance document, we have developed a consensus framework for the investigation and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/toxicity
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/toxicity
- Consensus
- Endoscopy/methods
- Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods
- Enterocolitis/chemically induced
- Enterocolitis/drug therapy
- Enterocolitis/metabolism
- Gastroenterology/organization & administration
- Gastrointestinal Diseases/chemically induced
- Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging
- Gastrointestinal Diseases/pathology
- Guidelines as Topic
- Humans
- Infliximab/therapeutic use
- Lactoferrin/metabolism
- Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex/metabolism
- Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Patient Care Management/methods
- Societies, Medical/organization & administration
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
- United Kingdom/epidemiology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Powell
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Hajir Ibraheim
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard A Speight
- Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Sophie Papa
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Oliver Brain
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Green
- Department of Histopathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark A Samaan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Polychronis Pavlidis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Centre for Inflammation and Cancer Immunology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Peter Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Samra Turajlic
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | | | - James O Lindsay
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kennedy NA, Hansen R, Younge L, Mawdsley J, Beattie RM, Din S, Lamb CA, Smith PJ, Selinger C, Limdi J, Iqbal TH, Lobo A, Cooney R, Brain O, Gaya DR, Murray C, Pollok R, Kent A, Raine T, Bhala N, Lindsay JO, Irving PM, Lees CW, Sebastian S. Organisational changes and challenges for inflammatory bowel disease services in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontline Gastroenterol 2020; 11:343-350. [PMID: 32874484 PMCID: PMC7335699 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2020-101520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the challenges in diagnosis, monitoring, support provision in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and explore the adaptations of IBD services. METHODS Internet-based survey by invitation of IBD services across the UK from 8 to 14 April 2020. RESULTS Respondents from 125 IBD services completed the survey. The number of whole-time equivalent gastroenterologists and IBD nurses providing elective outpatient care decreased significantly between baseline (median 4, IQR 4-7.5 and median 3, IQR 2-4) to the point of survey (median 2, IQR 1-4.8 and median 2, IQR 1-3) in the 6-week period following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (p<0.001 for both comparisons). Almost all (94%; 112/119) services reported an increase in IBD helpline activity. Face-to-face clinics were substituted for telephone consultation by 86% and video consultation by 11% of services. A variation in the provision of laboratory faecal calprotectin testing was noted with 27% of services reporting no access to faecal calprotectin, and a further 32% reduced access. There was also significant curtailment of IBD-specific endoscopy and elective surgery. CONCLUSIONS IBD services in the UK have implemented several adaptive strategies in order to continue to provide safe and high-quality care for patients. National Health Service organisations will need to consider the impact of these changes in current service delivery models and staffing levels when planning exit strategies for post-pandemic IBD care. Careful planning to manage the increased workload and to maintain IBD services is essential to ensure patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas A Kennedy
- Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Richard Hansen
- Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lisa Younge
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Joel Mawdsley
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and Saint Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Mark Beattie
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Shahida Din
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christopher A Lamb
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Philip J Smith
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Jimmy Limdi
- Section of IBD, Division of Gastroenterology, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Tariq H Iqbal
- Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alan Lobo
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Rachel Cooney
- Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Oliver Brain
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel R Gaya
- Gastroenterology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Charles Murray
- Gastroenterology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Richard Pollok
- Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Alexandra Kent
- Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Neeraj Bhala
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and Saint Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charlie W Lees
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- IBD Unit, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kennedy NA, Jones GR, Lamb CA, Appleby R, Arnott I, Beattie RM, Bloom S, Brooks AJ, Cooney R, Dart RJ, Edwards C, Fraser A, Gaya DR, Ghosh S, Greveson K, Hansen R, Hart A, Hawthorne AB, Hayee B, Limdi JK, Murray CD, Parkes GC, Parkes M, Patel K, Pollok RC, Powell N, Probert CS, Raine T, Sebastian S, Selinger C, Smith PJ, Stansfield C, Younge L, Lindsay JO, Irving PM, Lees CW. British Society of Gastroenterology guidance for management of inflammatory bowel disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gut 2020; 69:984-990. [PMID: 32303607 PMCID: PMC7211081 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is putting unprecedented pressures on healthcare systems globally. Early insights have been made possible by rapid sharing of data from China and Italy. In the UK, we have rapidly mobilised inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) centres in order that preparations can be made to protect our patients and the clinical services they rely on. This is a novel coronavirus; much is unknown as to how it will affect people with IBD. We also lack information about the impact of different immunosuppressive medications. To address this uncertainty, the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) COVID-19 IBD Working Group has used the best available data and expert opinion to generate a risk grid that groups patients into highest, moderate and lowest risk categories. This grid allows patients to be instructed to follow the UK government's advice for shielding, stringent and standard advice regarding social distancing, respectively. Further considerations are given to service provision, medical and surgical therapy, endoscopy, imaging and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas A Kennedy
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
- University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Gareth-Rhys Jones
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christopher A Lamb
- Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Richard Appleby
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - R Mark Beattie
- Southampton Children's Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Stuart Bloom
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alenka J Brooks
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Rachel Cooney
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robin J Dart
- King's College London, London, UK
- The Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Aileen Fraser
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Daniel R Gaya
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Subrata Ghosh
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Richard Hansen
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ailsa Hart
- St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- King's College London, London, UK
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Gareth C Parkes
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Miles Parkes
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kamal Patel
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Richard C Pollok
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Nick Powell
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris S Probert
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts, Liverpool, UK
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Philip J Smith
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Lisa Younge
- Crohn's and Colitis UK, St Albans, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- King's College London, London, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charlie W Lees
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Levine A, Rhodes JM, Lindsay JO, Abreu MT, Kamm MA, Gibson PR, Gasche C, Silverberg MS, Mahadevan U, Boneh RS, Wine E, Damas OM, Syme G, Trakman GL, Yao CK, Stockhamer S, Hammami MB, Garces LC, Rogler G, Koutroubakis IE, Ananthakrishnan AN, McKeever L, Lewis JD. Dietary Guidance From the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1381-1392. [PMID: 32068150 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.01.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2019] [Revised: 12/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Recent evidence points to a plausible role of diet and the microbiome in the pathogenesis of both Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Dietary therapies based on exclusion of table foods and replacement with nutritional formulas and/or a combination of nutritional formulas and specific table foods may induce remission in CD. In UC, specific dietary components have also been associated with flare of disease. While evidence of varying quality has identified potential harmful or beneficial dietary components, physicians and patients at the present time do not have guidance as to which foods are safe, may be protective or deleterious for these diseases. The current document has been compiled by the nutrition cluster of the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IOIBD) based on the best current evidence to provide expert opinion regarding specific dietary components, food groups and food additives that may be prudent to increase or decrease in the diet of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases to control and prevent relapse of inflammatory bowel diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arie Levine
- Pediatric IBD Center, Wolfson Medical Center Holon, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jonathan M Rhodes
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria T Abreu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Michael A Kamm
- St Vincent's Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter R Gibson
- Monash University and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Mark S Silverberg
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Uma Mahadevan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rotem Sigall Boneh
- Pediatric IBD Center, Wolfson Medical Center Holon, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eyton Wine
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada; Department of Physiology, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Oriana M Damas
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Graeme Syme
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gina L Trakman
- St Vincent's Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chu Kion Yao
- Monash University and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stefanie Stockhamer
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Luis C Garces
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | | | | | | | - Liam McKeever
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - James D Lewis
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sands BE, Armuzzi A, Marshall JK, Lindsay JO, Sandborn WJ, Danese S, Panés J, Bressler B, Colombel JF, Lawendy N, Maller E, Zhang H, Chan G, Salese L, Tsilkos K, Marren A, Su C. Letter: corticosteroid use alongside tofacitinib in OCTAVE Open. Authors' reply. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 51:997-998. [PMID: 32338784 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce E Sands
- Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- IBD Unit, Presidio Columbus, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - John K Marshall
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - James O Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - William J Sandborn
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Silvio Danese
- IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Julián Panés
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Brian Bressler
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jean-Frédéric Colombel
- Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Cox SR, Lindsay JO, Fromentin S, Stagg AJ, McCarthy NE, Galleron N, Ibraim SB, Roume H, Levenez F, Pons N, Maziers N, Lomer MC, Ehrlich SD, Irving PM, Whelan K. Effects of Low FODMAP Diet on Symptoms, Fecal Microbiome, and Markers of Inflammation in Patients With Quiescent Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:176-188.e7. [PMID: 31586453 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS There is limited evidence that a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) reduces gut symptoms in quiescent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We performed a randomized, controlled trial to investigate the effects of a low FODMAP diet on persistent gut symptoms, the intestinal microbiome, and circulating markers of inflammation in patients with quiescent IBD. METHODS We performed a single-blind trial of 52 patients with quiescent Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis and persistent gut symptoms at 2 large gastroenterology clinics in the United Kingdom. Patients were randomly assigned to groups that followed a diet low in FODMAPs (n = 27) or a control diet (n = 25), with dietary advice, for 4 weeks. Gut symptoms and health-related quality of life were measured using validated questionnaires. Stool and blood samples were collected at baseline and end of trial. We assessed fecal microbiome composition and function using shotgun metagenomic sequencing and phenotypes of T cells in blood using flow cytometry. RESULTS A higher proportion of patients reported adequate relief of gut symptoms following the low FODMAP diet (14/27, 52%) than the control diet (4/25, 16%, P=.007). Patients had a greater reduction in irritable bowel syndrome severity scores following the low FODMAP diet (mean reduction of 67; standard error, 78) than the control diet (mean reduction of 34; standard error, 50), although this difference was not statistically significant (P = .075). Following the low FODMAP diet, patients had higher health-related quality of life scores (81.9 ± 1.2) than patients on the control diet (78.3 ± 1.2, P = .042). A targeted analysis revealed that in stool samples collected at the end of the study period, patients on the low FODMAP diet had significantly lower abundance of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium longum, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii than patients on control diet. However, microbiome diversity and markers of inflammation did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS In a trial of the low FODMAP diet vs a control diet in patients with quiescent IBD, we found no significant difference after 4 weeks in change in irritable bowel syndrome severity scores, but significant improvements in specific symptom scores and numbers reporting adequate symptom relief. The low FODMAP diet reduced fecal abundance of microbes believed to regulate the immune response, compared with the control diet, but had no significant effect on markers of inflammation. We conclude that a 4-week diet low in FODMAPs is safe and effective for managing persistent gut symptoms in patients with quiescent IBD. www.isrctn.com no.: ISRCTN17061468.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selina R Cox
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - James O Lindsay
- Barts Health NHS Trust, Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Immunobiology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sébastien Fromentin
- Metagénopolis, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Andrew J Stagg
- Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Immunobiology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neil E McCarthy
- Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Immunobiology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nathalie Galleron
- Metagénopolis, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Samar B Ibraim
- Metagénopolis, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Hugo Roume
- Metagénopolis, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Florence Levenez
- Metagénopolis, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Pons
- Metagénopolis, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Maziers
- Metagénopolis, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Miranda C Lomer
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Dusko Ehrlich
- Metagénopolis, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin Whelan
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|