1
|
Curtius K, Kabir M, Al Bakir I, Choi CHR, Hartono JL, Johnson M, East JE, Lindsay JO, Vega R, Thomas-Gibson S, Warusavitarne J, Wilson A, Graham TA, Hart A. Multicentre derivation and validation of a colitis-associated colorectal cancer risk prediction web tool. Gut 2022; 71:705-715. [PMID: 33990383 PMCID: PMC8921573 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) diagnosed with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) have increased risk of developing advanced neoplasia (AN: high-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer). We aimed to develop and validate a predictor of AN risk in patients with UC with LGD and create a visual web tool to effectively communicate the risk. DESIGN In our retrospective multicentre validated cohort study, adult patients with UC with an index diagnosis of LGD, identified from four UK centres between 2001 and 2019, were followed until progression to AN. In the discovery cohort (n=246), a multivariate risk prediction model was derived from clinicopathological features using Cox regression. Validation used data from three external centres (n=198). The validated model was embedded in a web tool to calculate patient-specific risk. RESULTS Four clinicopathological variables were significantly associated with AN progression in the discovery cohort: endoscopically visible LGD >1 cm (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.2 to 5.9), unresectable or incomplete endoscopic resection (HR 3.4; 95% CI 1.6 to 7.4), moderate/severe histological inflammation within 5 years of LGD diagnosis (HR 3.1; 95% CI 1.5 to 6.7) and multifocality (HR 2.9; 95% CI 1.3 to 6.2). In the validation cohort, this four-variable model accurately predicted future AN cases with overall calibration Observed/Expected=1.01 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.52), and achieved 100% specificity for the lowest risk group over 13 years of available follow-up. CONCLUSION Multicohort validation confirms that patients with large, unresected, multifocal LGD and recent moderate/severe inflammation are at highest risk of developing AN. Personalised risk prediction provided via the Ulcerative Colitis-Cancer Risk Estimator ( www.UC-CaRE.uk ) can support treatment decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kit Curtius
- Centre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Misha Kabir
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Ibrahim Al Bakir
- Centre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Chang Ho Ryan Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Juanda L Hartono
- Division of Gastroenterology, National University Hospital, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Michael Johnson
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James O Lindsay
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Roser Vega
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Siwan Thomas-Gibson
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Janindra Warusavitarne
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Colorectal Surgery and Lennard-Jones Intestinal Failure Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Ana Wilson
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Trevor A Graham
- Centre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ailsa Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hartono JL, Koh T, Lee GH, Tan PS, Muthiah M, Aw MM, Madhavan K, Kow A, Lim KB. Predictors of Non-adherence to Immunosuppressive Therapy in Asian Liver Transplant Recipients. Transplant Proc 2018; 49:1419-1424. [PMID: 28736016 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.02.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to immunosuppressive medications has been shown to affect post-transplant outcomes. We aimed to determine the level of adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplant (LT) recipients and to elucidate factors associated with it, as well as patient preferences on the dosing schedule. METHODS LT recipients were recruited during transplant clinic follow-up. A validated Morisky 8-item questionnaire was completed by patients to assess their adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Adherence was determined by the sum of the responses to the questionnaire. Low, medium, and high adherence were defined by a Morisky score of >2, 1 to 2, and 0, respectively. Data on the patient's socio-economic and clinical background, dosing schedule of immunosuppressant medications, and patient preferences were included in the questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 107 LT recipients were approached and 75 completed the questionnaire. The majority of patients (48/74, 64.9%) preferred a once-daily medication regimen. The proportion of high adherence was 24/75 (32.0%), medium adherence was 51/75 (42.7%), and low adherence was 19/75 (25.3%). Multivariate analysis showed younger age and post-transplant duration >5 years as independent predictors for low adherence. Among low-adherence patients, 16/19 (84.2%) patients were on a twice-daily regimen, and, of these, 14/16 (87.5%) preferred their medications to be reduced to once daily. CONCLUSIONS A significant proportion (68%) of LT recipients had low to moderate adherence to medications, with younger age and longer post-transplant duration of >5 years as independent predictors. Early identification of at-risk patients is essential to allow implementation of measures to improve adherence. Simplifying medication regimens to once daily is a potential way to improve adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Hartono
- Yong Yoo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - T Koh
- Department of Pharmacy, National University Health System, Singapore; National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - G H Lee
- Yong Yoo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, Singapore; National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - P S Tan
- Yong Yoo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, Singapore; National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - M Muthiah
- Yong Yoo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, Singapore; National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - M M Aw
- Yong Yoo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Pediatrics, Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - K Madhavan
- Yong Yoo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore; National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - A Kow
- Yong Yoo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore; National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - K B Lim
- Yong Yoo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, Singapore; National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hartono JL, Aung MO, Dan YY, Gowans M, Lim K, Lee YM, Lee GH, Low HC, Tan PS, Thwin MA, Soon C, Chiu LL, Khoo MJ, Koay E, Lim SG. Resolution of adefovir-related nephrotoxicity by adefovir dose-reduction in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37:710-9. [PMID: 23432107 DOI: 10.1111/apt.12251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2012] [Revised: 10/08/2012] [Accepted: 01/27/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic hepatitis B patients (CHB) treated with adefovir were followed up to evaluate nephrotoxicity and its outcome. AIM To assess the incidence of renal dysfunction during adefovir therapy in Asian patients and factors associated with it, and evaluate strategies to improve adefovir-related renal dysfunction and their impact on viral suppression. METHODS Chronic hepatitis B clinic patients from a tertiary hospital on adefovir treatment, with their clinical and laboratory parameters were extracted from the hospital electronic clinical database in an observational study design. Patients were excluded if they had liver/renal transplant, baseline renal impairment or were on dialysis. Adefovir-related renal dysfunction was defined as adefovir-related abnormal serum creatinine (ARASC) > 125 μmol/L (males), >90 μmol/L (females); adefovir-related abnormal GFR <60 mL/min; and adefovir-related increased serum creatinine >0.5 mg/dL, without other known causes of nephrotoxicity. RESULTS A total of 271/383 adefovir-treated patients were suitable for analysis and 33(12%) patients developed abnormal serum creatinine. Cumulative increase in proportion of patients with ARASC was 33.8% and GFR ≤60 mL/min was 38.3% by 6 years, while serum creatinine increase ≥0.5 mg/dL was 21.48% by 5 years. Using multivariate analysis, the only independent baseline predictor of ARASC was GFR ≤76.1 mL/min. Patients who had ARASC had similar levels of viral suppression to those who did not have ARASC. Those who had ARASC either continued adefovir (24%), switched therapy (24%) or had adefovir dose reduction (52%). ARASC resolved and GFR normalised in almost all patients after either switching therapy or reducing adefovir dose, with no difference between the two strategies (P = 0.737). Those with adefovir dose reduction had no significant increase in HBV DNA (P = 0.170). CONCLUSIONS Adefovir-related renal dysfunction occurred in a significant number of adefovir-treated patients, but reduction of the dose led to renal improvement without compromising treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Hartono
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|