1
|
Macina D, Mathur S, Dvaretskaya M, Ekhtiari S, Hayat P, Montmerle M, Daluwatte C. Estimating the pertussis burden in adolescents and adults in the United States between 2007 and 2019. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2208514. [PMID: 37171153 PMCID: PMC10184607 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2208514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
We developed a machine learning algorithm to identify undiagnosed pertussis episodes in adolescent and adult patients with reported acute respiratory disease (ARD) using clinician notes in an electronic healthcare record (EHR) database. Here, we utilized the algorithm to better estimate the overall pertussis incidence within the Optum Humedica clinical repository from 1 January 2007 through 31 December 2019. The incidence of diagnosed pertussis episodes was 1-5 per 100,000 annually, consistent with data registered by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) over the same time period. Among 18,573,496 ARD episodes assessed, 1,053,946 were identified (i.e. algorithm-identified) as likely undiagnosed pertussis episodes. Accounting for these undiagnosed pertussis episodes increased the estimated pertussis incidence by 110-fold on average (34-474 per 100,000 annually). Risk factors for pertussis episodes (diagnosed and algorithm-identified) included asthma (Odds ratio [OR] 2.14; 2.12-2.16), immunodeficiency (OR 1.85; 1.78-1.91), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.63; 1.61-1.65), obesity (OR 1.44; 1.43-1.45), Crohn's disease (OR 1.39; 1.33-1.45), diabetes type 1 (OR 1.21; 1.17-1.24) and type 2 (OR 1.12; 1.1-1.13). Of note, all these risk factors, except Crohn's disease, increased the likelihood of severe pertussis. In conclusion, the incidence of pertussis in the adolescent and adult population in the USA is likely substantial, but considerably under-recognized, highlighting the need for improved clinical awareness of the disease and for improved control strategies in this population. These results will help better inform public health vaccination and booster programs, particularly in those with underlying comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Macina
- Global Medical, PPH Franchise, Sanofi, Lyon, France
| | - Sachin Mathur
- Digital R&D, Sanofi US Services, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ghalandari N, Immink MM, Röder E, Bruijning-Verhagen PCJ, Smeele H, Crijns H, van der Maas NAT, Bekker MN, Sanders EAM, Dolhain RJEM. Maternal and neonatal antibody levels on pertussis vaccination in pregnant women on immune-modulating therapy for rheumatic disease. RMD Open 2023; 9:e002985. [PMID: 37640516 PMCID: PMC10462940 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-002985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES While protection against pertussis following maternal tetanus-diphtheria-and-acellular-pertussis (Tdap) vaccination was demonstrated in healthy term-born infants, no evidence is available on Tdap vaccination in combination with immune-modulating therapy during pregnancy. In this pilot study, we explored whether treatment with tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFis) in pregnant patients with rheumatic disease interferes with Tdap vaccine responses and affects maternal anti-pertussis IgG antibody levels in newborns. METHODS Patients were included by a rheumatologist during pregnancy in case they received maternal Tdap vaccination in the late-second or early-third trimester of pregnancy. Blood samples were obtained from mothers during the first pregnancy trimester, 3 months after delivery and from the umbilical cord. IgG antibody levels against Tdap-included antigens were measured using a bead-based multiplex immunoassay. Findings on patients exposed to TNFis were compared with those from TNFi-unexposed patients and with data from a historical comparator study among healthy Tdap vaccinated mother-infant pairs (n=53). RESULTS 66 patients (46 exposed and 20 unexposed to TNFIs) were enrolled. No major differences in IgG antibody levels were observed between TNFi-exposed and unexposed mothers before maternal Tdap vaccination and 3 months after delivery. In cord sera, however, antibody levels against pertussis toxin were significantly lower after TNFi-treatment (35.94 IU/mL, 95% CI 20.68 to 62.45) compared with no TNFi-treatment of mothers with rheumatic disease (94.61 IU/mL, 95% CI 48.89 to 183.07) and lower compared with a cohort of healthy mothers (125.12 IU/mL, 95% CI 90.75 to 172.50). We observed similar differences for filamentous haemagglutinin, pertactin, tetanus toxoid and diphtheria toxoid. CONCLUSION These preliminary data indicate no major differences in IgG antibody levels on maternal Tdap vaccination in pregnant women with or without immune-modulating treatment, although our findings suggest that TNFis during pregnancy induce lower maternal anti-pertussis-specific protective antibody levels in newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nafise Ghalandari
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maarten M Immink
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Esther Röder
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Patricia C J Bruijning-Verhagen
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hieronymus Smeele
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Nicoline A T van der Maas
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth A M Sanders
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Universitair Medisch Centrum, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee YJ, Kim ES. Vaccination strategies for Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Korean J Intern Med 2022; 37:920-930. [PMID: 35934888 PMCID: PMC9449215 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2022.149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are vulnerable to vaccine-preventable infectious diseases. Immunosuppressive drugs, which are often used to manage IBD, may increase this vulnerability and attenuate vaccine efficacy. Thus, healthcare providers should understand infectious diseases and schedule vaccinations for them to reduce the infection-related burden of patients with IBD. All patients with IBD should be assessed in terms of immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases at the time of IBD diagnosis, and be vaccinated appropriately. Vaccination is becoming more important because of the unprecedented coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global health crisis. This review focuses on recent updates to vaccination strategies for Korean patients with IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoo Jin Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine & Institute for Medical Science, Keimyung University, Daegu,
Korea
| | - Eun Soo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ford T, Danchin M, McMinn A, Perrett K, Alex G, Crawford NW. Immunisation status of children and adolescents with a new diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:6. [PMID: 34983407 PMCID: PMC8725393 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06976-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) are at increased risk of serious infections, including vaccine preventable diseases. Current evidence suggests uptake of additional recommended special risk vaccinations is low. Identification of IBD patients prior to commencing immunosuppressive therapy allows for optimisation of vaccination, including timely administration of live-attenuated and additional recommended vaccines, such as influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. METHODS Paediatric patients (0-18 years) seen at the tertiary Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, with a recent diagnosis of IBD were referred by the Gastroenterology Unit to our Specialist Immunisation Clinic (SIC) for assessment and provision of routine and special risk vaccines. Data was collected via a standardised REDCap questionnaire completed in or post attendance at the SIC and included serology results where available. RESULTS Sixty-nine paediatric patients were recruited to the study between 2014 and 2017. Median age at IBD diagnosis was 11.25 years (IQR 4.64 years), with median time between diagnosis and SIC review of 0.88 years (IQR 2.84 years). At initial review 84.1% (58/69) of patients were up to date with vaccines on the Australian National Immunisation Program (NIP) schedule. Of those who were tested, serological evidence of immunity was demonstrated in 38.3% (23/60) of patients for Hepatitis B, 66.7% (36/54) for measles, 51.9% (28/54) for rubella and 41.9% (26/62) for Varicella Zoster Virus. Prior to SIC review 47.8% (33/69) had additional vaccinations and 92.8% (64/69) had vaccinations administered in the 12 months following SIC assessment. The Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (76.8%, 53/69) was the most commonly administered vaccine after SIC review, followed by influenza vaccine (69.6%, 48/69). Within 12 months of SIC review 43.5% (30/69) of patients had completed the schedule and were up-to-date as recommended by the SIC. CONCLUSIONS Children with IBD and other special risk groups can benefit from early referral to a SIC team to ensure optimal administration of routine and additionally recommended vaccines, especially live and additional special risk vaccines. The value of optimising immunisations could also be applied to other special risk groups, including adult IBD cohorts, particularly those commencing newer biologic immunosuppressive medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Ford
- Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Margie Danchin
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI), Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.,Immunisation services & General Medicine, RCH, Melbourne, Australia.,Department Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Alissa McMinn
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI), Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kirsten Perrett
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI), Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.,Immunisation services & General Medicine, RCH, Melbourne, Australia.,Department Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - George Alex
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI), Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.,Department Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Gastroenterology Department, RCH, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nigel W Crawford
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI), Parkville, Melbourne, Australia. .,Immunisation services & General Medicine, RCH, Melbourne, Australia. .,Department Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wieringa JW, van Beek RHT, Rövekamp LW, Driessen GJA, van Wering HM. Response to Vaccination in Infants Exposed to Antitumor Necrosis Factor Alpha In Utero. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2021; 40:912-916. [PMID: 34260494 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000003271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In this retrospective cohort study, the response to routinely administered Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine, pneumococcal and pertussis vaccinations in 27 children exposed to antitumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) during pregnancy was measured. The overall vaccination response seems comparable for children exposed to anti-TNFα and healthy infants. After primary vaccination series, inadequate response was present in some patients and might be related to exposure to anti-TNFα.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lyanne W Rövekamp
- Department of Pediatrics, Haga Teaching Hospital, Juliana Children's Hospital, The Hague
| | - Gertjan J A Driessen
- Department of Pediatrics, Haga Teaching Hospital, Juliana Children's Hospital, The Hague
- Department of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jones JL, Tse F, Carroll MW, deBruyn JC, McNeil SA, Pham-Huy A, Seow CH, Barrett LL, Bessissow T, Carman N, Melmed GY, Vanderkooi OG, Marshall JK, Benchimol EI. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for Immunizations in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)-Part 2: Inactivated Vaccines. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2021; 4:e72-e91. [PMID: 34476339 PMCID: PMC8407486 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwab016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The effectiveness and safety of vaccinations can be altered by immunosuppressive therapies, and perhaps by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) itself. These recommendations developed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association, aim to provide guidance on immunizations in adult and pediatric patients with IBD. This publication focused on inactivated vaccines. METHODS Systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of vaccines in patients with IBD, other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, and the general population were performed. Critical outcomes included mortality, vaccine-preventable diseases, and serious adverse events. Immunogenicity was considered a surrogate outcome for vaccine efficacy. Certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Key questions were developed through an iterative online platform, and voted on by a multidisciplinary group. Recommendations were formulated using the Evidence-to-Decision framework. Strong recommendation means that most patients should receive the recommended course of action, whereas a conditional recommendation means that different choices will be appropriate for different patients. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 15 of 20 questions. Recommendations address the following vaccines: Haemophilus influenzae type b, recombinant zoster, hepatitis B, influenza, pneumococcus, meningococcus, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis, and human papillomavirus. Most of the recommendations for patients with IBD are congruent with the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommendations for the general population, with the following exceptions. In patients with IBD, the panel suggested Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine for patients older than 5 years of age, recombinant zoster vaccine for adults younger than 50 year of age, and hepatitis B vaccine for adults without a risk factor. Consensus was not reached, and recommendations were not made for 5 statements, due largely to lack of evidence, including double-dose hepatitis B vaccine, timing of influenza immunization in patients on biologics, pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccines in adult patients without risk factors, and human papillomavirus vaccine in patients aged 27-45 years. CONCLUSIONS Patients with IBD may be at increased risk of some vaccine-preventable diseases. Therefore, maintaining appropriate vaccination status in these patients is critical to optimize patient outcomes. In general, IBD is not a contraindication to the use of inactivated vaccines, but immunosuppressive therapy may reduce vaccine responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Jones
- Department of Medicine and Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie
University, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Frances Tse
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health
Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton,
Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew W Carroll
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition,
Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta,
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jennifer C deBruyn
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Departments of Pediatrics and
Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shelly A McNeil
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie
University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Anne Pham-Huy
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Immunology and Allergy, Department of
Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of
Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cynthia H Seow
- Division of Gastroenterology, Departments of Medicine and Community
Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary,
Alberta, Canada
| | - Lisa L Barrett
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie
University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Talat Bessissow
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health
Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nicholas Carman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa,
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- CHEO Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology,
Hepatology and Nutrition, Children’s Hospital of Eastern
Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gil Y Melmed
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical
Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Otto G Vanderkooi
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Departments of Pediatrics,
Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta
Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Calgary,
Alberta, Canada
| | - John K Marshall
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health
Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton,
Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric I Benchimol
- Department of Pediatrics and School of Epidemiology and Public Health,
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada
- CHEO Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology,
Hepatology and Nutrition, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario and CHEO
Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada
- ICES Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada,
SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of
Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Child
Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, ICES,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jones JL, Tse F, Carroll MW, deBruyn JC, McNeil SA, Pham-Huy A, Seow CH, Barrett LL, Bessissow T, Carman N, Melmed GY, Vanderkooi OG, Marshall JK, Benchimol EI. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for Immunizations in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)-Part 2: Inactivated Vaccines. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:681-700. [PMID: 34334167 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The effectiveness and safety of vaccinations can be altered by immunosuppressive therapies, and perhaps by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) itself. These recommendations developed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association, aim to provide guidance on immunizations in adult and pediatric patients with IBD. This publication focused on inactivated vaccines. METHODS Systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of vaccines in patients with IBD, other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, and the general population were performed. Critical outcomes included mortality, vaccine-preventable diseases, and serious adverse events. Immunogenicity was considered a surrogate outcome for vaccine efficacy. Certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Key questions were developed through an iterative online platform, and voted on by a multidisciplinary group. Recommendations were formulated using the Evidence-to-Decision framework. Strong recommendation means that most patients should receive the recommended course of action, whereas a conditional recommendation means that different choices will be appropriate for different patients. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 15 of 20 questions. Recommendations address the following vaccines: Haemophilus influenzae type b, recombinant zoster, hepatitis B, influenza, pneumococcus, meningococcus, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis, and human papillomavirus. Most of the recommendations for patients with IBD are congruent with the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommendations for the general population, with the following exceptions. In patients with IBD, the panel suggested Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine for patients older than 5 years of age, recombinant zoster vaccine for adults younger than 50 year of age, and hepatitis B vaccine for adults without a risk factor. Consensus was not reached, and recommendations were not made for 5 statements, due largely to lack of evidence, including double-dose hepatitis B vaccine, timing of influenza immunization in patients on biologics, pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccines in adult patients without risk factors, and human papillomavirus vaccine in patients aged 27-45 years. CONCLUSIONS Patients with IBD may be at increased risk of some vaccine-preventable diseases. Therefore, maintaining appropriate vaccination status in these patients is critical to optimize patient outcomes. In general, IBD is not a contraindication to the use of inactivated vaccines, but immunosuppressive therapy may reduce vaccine responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Jones
- Department of Medicine and Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
| | - Frances Tse
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew W Carroll
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jennifer C deBruyn
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Departments of Pediatrics and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shelly A McNeil
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Anne Pham-Huy
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Immunology and Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cynthia H Seow
- Division of Gastroenterology, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lisa L Barrett
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Talat Bessissow
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nicholas Carman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, CHEO Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gil Y Melmed
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Otto G Vanderkooi
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Departments of Pediatrics, Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - John K Marshall
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric I Benchimol
- Department of Pediatrics and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, CHEO Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario and CHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, ICES Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Craviotto V, Furfaro F, Loy L, Zilli A, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Fiorino G, Danese S, Allocca M. Viral infections in inflammatory bowel disease: Tips and tricks for correct management. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:4276-4297. [PMID: 34366605 PMCID: PMC8316900 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i27.4276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past decades, the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has become more targeted, anticipating the use of immune-modifying therapies at an earlier stage. This top-down approach has been correlated with favorable short and long-term outcomes, but it has also brought with it concerns regarding potential infectious complications. This large IBD population treated with immune-modifying therapies, especially if combined, has an increased risk of severe infections, including opportunistic infections that are sustained by viral, bacterial, parasitic, and fungal agents. Viral infections have emerged as a focal safety concern in patients with IBD, representing a challenge for the clinician: they are often difficult to diagnose and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The first step is to improve effective preventive strategies, such as applying vaccination protocols, adopt adequate prophylaxis and educate patients about potential risk factors. Since viral infections in immunosuppressed patients may present atypical signs and symptoms, the challenges for the gastroenterologist are to suspect, recognize and diagnose such complications. Appropriate treatment of common viral infections allows us to minimize their impact on disease outcomes and patients’ lives. This practical review supports this standard of care to improve knowledge in this subject area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Craviotto
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Federica Furfaro
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Laura Loy
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Alessandra Zilli
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Inserm U954, University Hospital of Nancy, Lorraine University, Nancy 54511, France
| | - Gionata Fiorino
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20090, Milano, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20090, Milano, Italy
| | - Mariangela Allocca
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20090, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gresham LM, Marzario B, Dutz J, Kirchhof MG. An evidence-based guide to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of patients on immunotherapies in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 84:1652-1666. [PMID: 33482251 PMCID: PMC7816618 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.01.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Immune-mediated diseases and immunotherapeutics can negatively affect normal immune functioning and, consequently, vaccine safety and response. The COVID-19 pandemic has incited research aimed at developing a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine. As SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are developed and made available, the assessment of anticipated safety and efficacy in patients with immune-mediated dermatologic diseases and requiring immunosuppressive and/or immunomodulatory therapy is particularly important. A review of the literature was conducted by a multidisciplinary committee to provide guidance on the safety and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for dermatologists and other clinicians when prescribing immunotherapeutics. The vaccine platforms being used to develop SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are expected to be safe and potentially effective for dermatology patients on immunotherapeutics. Current guidelines for the vaccination of an immunocompromised host remain appropriate when considering future administration of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise M Gresham
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Barbara Marzario
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jan Dutz
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Mark G Kirchhof
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Caldera F, Ley D, Hayney MS, Farraye FA. Optimizing Immunization Strategies in Patients with IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021; 27:123-133. [PMID: 32232388 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izaa055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) include the use of immune modifiers and monoclonal antibodies, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitors, anti-integrin agents, janus kinase inhibitors, and interleukin-12/23 inhibitors. These agents achieve higher rates of clinical remission and mucosal healing than conventional therapy. However, these therapies increase the risk of infections, including some vaccine-preventable diseases. Infections are one of the most common adverse event of immunosuppressive therapy. Thus, providers should optimize immunization strategies to reduce the risk of vaccine-preventable infections in patients with IBD. There are several newly licensed vaccines recommended for adults by the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. This review will focus on how gastroenterology providers can implement the adult immunization schedule approved by ACIP for patients with IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freddy Caldera
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Dana Ley
- Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Mary S Hayney
- School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Identification of Differential Intestinal Mucosa Transcriptomic Biomarkers for Ulcerative Colitis by Bioinformatics Analysis. DISEASE MARKERS 2020; 2020:8876565. [PMID: 33144895 PMCID: PMC7596466 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8876565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a complicated disease caused by the interaction between genetic and environmental factors that affect mucosal homeostasis and triggers inappropriate immune response. The purpose of the study was to identify significant biomarkers with potential therapeutic targets and the underlying mechanisms. Methods The gene expression profiles of GSE48958, GSE73661, and GSE59071 are from the GEO database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened by the GEO2R tool. Next, the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) was applied to analyze gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway. Then, protein-protein interaction (PPI) was visualized by Cytoscape with Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING). Results There were a total of 128 common DEGs genes, including 86 upregulated genes enriched in extracellular space, regulation of inflammatory response, chemokine-mediated signaling pathway, response to lipopolysaccharide, and cell proliferation, while 42 downregulated genes enriched in the integral component of the membrane, the integral component of the plasma membrane, apical plasma membrane, symporter activity, and chloride channel activity. The KEGG pathway analysis results demonstrated that DEGs were particularly enriched in cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, TNF signaling pathway, chemokine signaling pathway, pertussis, and rheumatoid arthritis. 18 central modules of the PPI networks were selected with Cytotype MCODE. Furthermore, 18 genes were found to significantly enrich in the extracellular space, inflammatory response, chemokine-mediated signaling pathway, TNF signaling pathway, regulation of cell proliferation, and immune response via reanalysis of DAVID. Conclusion The study identified DEGs, key target genes, functional pathways, and pathway analysis of UC, which may provide potential molecular targets and diagnostic biomarkers for UC.
Collapse
|
12
|
Shah BB, Goenka MK. A comprehensive review of vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: An Indian perspective. Indian J Gastroenterol 2020; 39:321-330. [PMID: 32844299 PMCID: PMC7447584 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-020-01069-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The disease burden of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in India is estimated to be one of the highest in the world in the near future. Patients with IBD, particularly those on immunosuppressive therapy, are at increased risk for developing vaccine-preventable illnesses. Adult vaccination policy and vaccination in patients with IBD are presently being at a very low level in India. This review discusses in detail the need for vaccination, levels of immunosuppression, a brief account of live and inactivated vaccines, available vaccines, and their utility in patients with IBD, with a special focus on recent recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhavik Bharat Shah
- Institute of Gastrosciences and Liver, Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals, 58 Canal Circular Road, Kolkata, 700 054, India
| | - Mahesh Kumar Goenka
- Institute of Gastrosciences and Liver, Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals, 58 Canal Circular Road, Kolkata, 700 054, India.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an immune-mediated disease, which often require lifetime treatment with immunomodulators and immunosuppressive drugs. Both IBD and its treatments are associated with an increased risk of infectious disease and mortality. Several of these diseases are vaccine preventable and could be avoided, reducing morbidity and mortality. However, vaccination rates among patients with IBD are lower than in the general population and both patients and doctors are not fully aware of the problem. Education campaigns and well planned vaccination schemes are necessary to improve vaccination coverage in patients with IBD. Immunomodulators and immunosuppressive drugs may reduce the seroprotection levels. For this reason, new vaccination schemes are being studied in patients with IBD. It is therefore important to understand which and when vaccines can be administrated based on immunocompetence or immunosuppression of patients. Usually, live-attenuated vaccines should be avoided in immunosuppressed patients, so assessing vaccination status and planning vaccination before immunosuppressive treatments are pivotal to reduce infection risk. The aim of this review is to increase the awareness of the problem and provide a quick reference for vaccination plan tailoring, especially for gastroenterologists and primary care physicians, who have the skills and knowledge to implement vaccination strategies.
Collapse
|
14
|
García-Serrano C, Mirada G, Marsal JR, Ortega M, Sol J, Solano R, Artigues EM, Estany P. Compliance with the guidelines on recommended immunization schedule in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: implications on public health policies. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:713. [PMID: 32429900 PMCID: PMC7236120 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08850-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a higher risk of developing opportunistic infections due to either the disease itself or to treatment with immunosuppressants. This risk can be reduced through vaccination. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of compliance with the guidelines on recommended immunization schedule in patients with IBD in the health district of Lleida, Spain. METHODS Descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective study of data at December 31, 2016. The reference population was formed by adults with a clinical diagnosis of IBD. The dependent variable was "compliance with the guidelines on recommended immunization schedule". Variables were sex, age, residence, diagnosis, vaccination against measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, tetanus-diphtheria, influenza, pneumococcus, meningococcus C, hepatitis B, and hepatitis A. Data were obtained from electronic medical records. For the data analysis, mean (standard deviation), prevalence with 95% confidence intervals, χ2 test and Mann-Whitney test were used. RESULTS Compliance did not exceed 65% for any of vaccines analysed in the 1722 studied patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. Significant differences across age groups were found in compliance for measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, tetanus, diphtheria and influenza in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and for meningococcus C and hepatitis A exclusively in ulcerative colitis. CONCLUSIONS Compliance in patients with IBD is low. Thus, prevention of immunopreventable diseases or their complications is not maximized in this kind of patients. Greater awareness of how vaccines can reduce the risk of vaccine-preventable infections is needed among both patients and healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina García-Serrano
- Catalan Health Institute (ICS), Primary Care, Lleida, Spain.,Lleida Institute for Biomedical Research (IRBLleida), Lleida, Spain
| | - Glòria Mirada
- Faculty of Nursery and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.,Catalan Agency of Public Health, Lleida, Spain
| | - Josep R Marsal
- Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, CIBERESP, Lleida, Spain
| | - Marta Ortega
- Catalan Health Institute (ICS), Primary Care, Lleida, Spain.,Research Support Unit Lleida, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Lleida, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.,Research Group in Therapies in Primary Care (GRETAPS), Lleida, Spain
| | - Joaquim Sol
- Catalan Health Institute (ICS), Primary Care, Lleida, Spain. .,Research Support Unit Lleida, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Lleida, Spain. .,Metabolic Physiopathology Group, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Lleida-IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.
| | - Rubén Solano
- Research Support Unit Lleida, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Lleida, Spain
| | - Eva M Artigues
- Catalan Health Institute (ICS), Primary Care, Lleida, Spain.,Faculty of Nursery and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.,Research Support Unit Lleida, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Lleida, Spain.,Research Group in Therapies in Primary Care (GRETAPS), Lleida, Spain.,Research Group in Health Education (GREpS), Department of Nursery and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Pepi Estany
- Catalan Health Institute (ICS), Primary Care, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wieringa JW, van der Woude CJ. Effect of biologicals and JAK inhibitors during pregnancy on health-related outcomes in children of women with inflammatory bowel disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2019; 44-45:101665. [PMID: 32359679 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2019.101665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Current guidelines advise to maintain immunomodulators and biologicals in pregnant patients because relapse of inflammatory bowel is associated with unfavourable pregnancy outcome. With the exception of Methotrexate, IBD therapy seems not to be related to an increase of congenital malformations or infections requiring hospitalisation of the babies, although the effect the on the developing immune system of the exposed infants remains unknown. In this review we will focus on the effect of IBD drugs on health-related outcomes in children taking into account possible long-term effects of biologicals and immunomodulators, which are transferred across the placenta.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W Wieringa
- Department of Pediatrics, Haaglanden Medical Center and Department of Pediatrics, Subdivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Lijnbaan 32, CK The Hague, 2501, the Netherlands.
| | - C J van der Woude
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015, CE, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Farshidpour M, Charabaty A, Mattar MC. Improving immunization strategies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Ann Gastroenterol 2019; 32:247-256. [PMID: 31040621 PMCID: PMC6479655 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2019.0351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are susceptible to varieties of opportunistic infections due to immunological changes in the setting of their disease and drug-induced immunosuppression. Even though numerous infections can be prevented by vaccine, vaccination in IBD patients is inadequate. Data showed only 9% were vaccinated against pneumococcal infection and 28% described commonly receiving influenza vaccine. This review article discusses the recent immunizations against influenza virus; pneumococcal infection; human papilloma virus; tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis; measles, mumps and rubella; varicella zoster; and herpes zoster for individuals diagnosed with IBD and those patients with drug-related immunosuppression. In addition, this review discusses concerns about IBD patients planning to travel abroad. Immunization status and screening for opportunistic infection need to be addressed in IBD patients at the time of diagnosis and they should be vaccinated accordingly. Generally, standard vaccination strategies should be pursued in IBD patients, although live vaccines should be avoided while they are not immunocompetent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maham Farshidpour
- Department of Inpatient Medicine, Banner University Medical Center, University of Arizona, Tucson (Maham Farshidpour), USA
| | - Aline Charabaty
- Division of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA (Aline Charabaty, Mark C. Mattar), USA
| | - Mark C Mattar
- Division of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA (Aline Charabaty, Mark C. Mattar), USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lai JH, Ling XC, Ho LJ. Useful message in choosing optimal biological agents for patients with autoimmune arthritis. Biochem Pharmacol 2019; 165:99-111. [PMID: 30876919 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2019.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The introduction of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatments for various types of autoimmune arthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthropathy and ankylosing spondylitis, represents a new era of treatment for patients with a refractory response to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). Many new bDMARDs with different modalities or that target different pro-inflammatory molecules, likely cytokines, are rapidly emerging. Hence, physicians in the field may be confused about choosing appropriate bDMARDs for their patients. Considering the high cost of bDMARDs and the rapid destructive process of autoimmune arthritis in patients, the choice of optimal bDMARDs for patients who fail to respond or show an inadequate therapeutic response to csDMARDs designed to control the disease is very critical. Here, we summarize the strengths and weaknesses of bDMARDs and specifically focus on their uses in patients with comorbid conditions or with specific medical conditions, such as pregnancy. This commentary provides a solid up-to-date review on commercially available bDMARDs and very useful information for physicians to facilitate the choice of more appropriate bDMARDs to treat patients with autoimmune arthritis and for basic researchers to understand the current strategies of bDMARD usage and hopefully to develop more powerful bDMARDs with fewer safety concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenn-Haung Lai
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, ROC; Graduate Institute of Medical Science, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
| | - Xiao Chun Ling
- Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Ling-Jun Ho
- Institute of Cellular and System Medicine, National Health Research Institute, Zhunan, Taiwan, ROC.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Papp KA, Haraoui B, Kumar D, Marshall JK, Bissonnette R, Bitton A, Bressler B, Gooderham M, Ho V, Jamal S, Pope JE, Steinhart AH, Vinh DC, Wade J. Vaccination Guidelines for Patients With Immune-Mediated Disorders on Immunosuppressive Therapies. J Cutan Med Surg 2018; 23:50-74. [PMID: 30463418 PMCID: PMC6330697 DOI: 10.1177/1203475418811335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with immune-mediated diseases on immunosuppressive therapies have more infectious episodes than healthy individuals, yet vaccination practices by physicians for this patient population remain suboptimal. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vaccines in individuals exposed to immunosuppressive therapies and provide evidence-based clinical practice recommendations. METHODS: A literature search for vaccination safety and efficacy in patients on immunosuppressive therapies (2009-2017) was conducted. Results were assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. RESULTS: Several immunosuppressive therapies attenuate vaccine response. Thus, vaccines should be administered before treatment whenever feasible. Inactivated vaccines can be administered without treatment discontinuation. Similarly, evidence suggests that the live zoster vaccine is safe and effective while on select immunosuppressive therapy, although use of the subunit vaccine is preferred. Caution regarding other live vaccines is warranted. Drug pharmacokinetics, duration of vaccine-induced viremia, and immune response kinetics should be considered to determine appropriate timing of vaccination and treatment (re)initiation. Infants exposed to immunosuppressive therapies through breastmilk can usually be immunized according to local guidelines. Intrauterine exposure to immunosuppressive agents is not a contraindication for inactivated vaccines. Live attenuated vaccines scheduled for infants and children ⩾12 months of age, including measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella, can be safely administered as sufficient time has elapsed for drug clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressive agents may attenuate vaccine responses, but protective benefit is generally maintained. While these recommendations are evidence based, they do not replace clinical judgment, and decisions regarding vaccination must carefully assess the risks, benefits, and circumstances of individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim A Papp
- 1 K Papp Clinical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada.,2 Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Boulos Haraoui
- 3 Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Deepali Kumar
- 4 University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,5 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John K Marshall
- 6 Department of Medicine and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Alain Bitton
- 8 McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Brian Bressler
- 9 Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,10 St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Melinda Gooderham
- 2 Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada.,11 Faculty of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Vincent Ho
- 9 Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Shahin Jamal
- 12 Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Janet E Pope
- 13 Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.,14 St Joseph's Health Care, London, ON, Canada
| | - A Hillary Steinhart
- 5 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,15 Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Donald C Vinh
- 8 McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,16 Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - John Wade
- 9 Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,17 Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Coukos J, Farraye FA. Update on Vaccinating the Patient With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 16:548-560. [PMID: 30293209 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-018-0200-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of infectious diseases independent of their immunosuppression status, and yet, studies suggest that this population is not receiving standard vaccinations at the same rate as the general population. This review seeks to understand why IBD patients may not be receiving recommended immunizations and to provide guidelines on vaccinating this vulnerable population. RECENT FINDINGS Inactive vaccines are recommended for patients with IBD regardless of immunosuppression status due to the increased risk for many vaccine-preventable illnesses. Certain live vaccines can be administered to the immunocompromised patient with IBD. Additionally, many patients with IBD will be immunosuppressed some time in their disease course, further increasing their risk for infection. Despite this understanding, patients with IBD have poor vaccination rates. Inadequate knowledge, limited time with patients, and lack of consensus as to who is responsible for identifying and administering vaccinations are some of the most important barriers to vaccinating the patient with IBD. In this review, we discuss guidelines for vaccinating both the immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patient with IBD as well as provide vaccine-specific recommendations. The evidence suggests that patients with IBD are not receiving recommended vaccinations because of misconceptions on the part of patients as well as a paucity of knowledge by their health care team. Educational programs can be successfully implemented to increase knowledge about appropriate vaccinations and can ultimately increase vaccine uptake among patients with IBD. In the end, gastroenterologists and primary care physicians must work together with their patients with IBD to ensure that recommended vaccinations are administered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Coukos
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Section of Gastroenterology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 85 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gerosa M, Argolini LM, Artusi C, Chighizola CB. The use of biologics and small molecules in pregnant patients with rheumatic diseases. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2018; 11:987-998. [PMID: 30227748 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2018.1525293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biological agents have radically changed the prognosis of rheumatic patients. Current evidence demonstrates that tight disease control during pregnancy is mandatory to minimize adverse outcome risk. As the new therapeutic tools are pivotal to maintain appropriate disease activity, it is timely to review available evidence about the safety of biologics and small molecules in pregnancy. Areas covered: A comprehensive literature review has been performed, reporting available data about the passage into breast milk, rate of pregnancy loss and fetal malformations, and long-term complications due to in utero exposure to biological agents and small molecules. Expert commentary: Data about the safety of agents against tumor necrosis factor in pregnancy are reassuring. Even rituximab, tocilizumab, belimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, and abatacept have not been associated with an increased rate of fetal abnormalities or adverse pregnancy outcome. Experience with small molecules is too small to draw any conclusion. Even if further data are warranted to define the possible long-term effects of in utero biologic exposure on the infant immune system development, it is reasonable to speculate that in the next future the use of biologics during pregnancy will continue to expand, at least when maternal benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Gerosa
- a Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health , University of Milan, Division of Clinical Rheumatology, ASST Istituto Gaetano Pini - CTO , Milan , Italy
| | - Lorenza Maria Argolini
- a Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health , University of Milan, Division of Clinical Rheumatology, ASST Istituto Gaetano Pini - CTO , Milan , Italy
| | - Carolina Artusi
- b Division of Clinical Rheumatology , ASST Istituto Gaetano Pini - CTO , Milan , Italy
| | - Cecilia Beatrice Chighizola
- c Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health , University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Experimental Laboratory of Immunorheumatological Researches, Istituto Auxologico Italiano , Milan , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Caldera F, Saha S, Wald A, Garmoe CA, McCrone S, Megna B, Ley D, Reichelderfer M, Hayney MS. Lower Sustained Diphtheria and Pertussis Antibody Concentrations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63:1532-1540. [PMID: 29594970 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5043-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are often immunosuppressed, and those patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) therapy can have lower antibody responses to vaccines. Pertussis cases are at their highest levels in the post-vaccine era. There is little data regarding responses to the Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis) vaccine in IBD patients. AIMS The aim of this study was to compare sustained vaccine-induced Tdap antibody concentrations in a cohort of IBD patients stratified by medication regimens with healthy controls (HC) who had received an adult Tdap booster. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional study evaluating antibody responses to Tdap vaccine among IBD patients compared to HC. Our study consisted of three patient groups: adults with IBD stratified by maintenance medication regimen: (1) thiopurine monotherapy; (2) anti-TNF monotherapy; and (3) combination therapy (anti-TNF and immunomodulator (thiopurine or methotrexate)). RESULTS Ninety IBD patients and 20 HC participated. Pertussis pertactin antibody concentrations were significantly lower in IBD patients (p = 0.021) compared to HC, and those on anti-TNF agents (monotherapy or combination) had lower antibody concentrations compared to those on thiopurine monotherapy (p = 0.028). Diphtheria antibody concentrations were also lower in IBD patients (p < 0.001), and those on anti-TNF agents (monotherapy or combination) had lower antibody concentrations compared to the thiopurine monotherapy group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION IBD patients on anti-TNF agents had lower antibody concentrations to diphtheria and pertussis. These findings suggest a need for different Tdap booster schedules for IBD patients on anti-TNF therapy. Clinical Trials Registry NCT02434133.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freddy Caldera
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705-2281, USA.
| | - Sumona Saha
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705-2281, USA
| | - Arnold Wald
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705-2281, USA
| | - Christine A Garmoe
- School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| | - Sue McCrone
- School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| | - Bryant Megna
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 750 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| | - Dana Ley
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 750 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| | - Mark Reichelderfer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705-2281, USA
| | - Mary S Hayney
- School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Beaulieu DB, Ananthakrishnan AN, Martin C, Cohen RD, Kane SV, Mahadevan U. Use of Biologic Therapy by Pregnant Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Does Not Affect Infant Response to Vaccines. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16:99-105. [PMID: 28870657 PMCID: PMC5735029 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Revised: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS In women with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), exposure to immunomodulator or biologic therapy has not been associated with adverse events during pregnancy or outcomes of newborns. We investigated whether exposure of patients to these agents during pregnancy affects serologic responses to vaccines in newborns. METHODS We collected data from the Pregnancy in IBD and Neonatal Outcomes registry, which records outcomes of pregnant women with diagnosis of IBD receiving care at multiple centers in the United States, from 2007 through 2016. Serum samples collected from infants at least 7 months old were analyzed for titers of antibodies to Haemophilus influenzae B (HiB) or tetanus toxin; mothers completed a survey of vaccine practices and outcomes from July 2013 through October 2016. Umbilical cord blood samples from 33 infants were assayed for concentration of biologic agents. Vaccination response was compared between infants born to mothers exposed to biologic therapy (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, natalizumab, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab-either as a single agent or in combination with an immunomodulator, at any time between conception and delivery) and infants born to unexposed mothers. RESULTS A total of 179 women completed the vaccine survey (26 biologic unexposed, 153 exposed to a biologic agent). We found no significant difference in proportions of infants with protective antibody titers against HiB born to exposed mothers (n = 42, 71%) vs unexposed mothers (n = 8, 50%) (P = .41). We also found no difference in the proportion of infants with protective antibody titers to tetanus toxoid born to exposed mothers (80%) vs unexposed mothers (75%) (P = .66). The median concentration of infliximab in cord blood did not differ significantly between infants with vs without protective antibody titers to HiB (P = .30) or tetanus toxoid (P = .93). Mild reactions were observed in 7/40 infants who received rotavirus vaccine and whose mothers had been exposed to biologic therapies. CONCLUSIONS Vaccination of infants against HiB and tetanus toxin, based on antibody titers measured when infants were at least 7 months old, does not appear to be affected by in utero exposure to biologic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn B. Beaulieu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Christopher Martin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Russell D. Cohen
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Sunanda V. Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Uma Mahadevan
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shrestha MP, Ruel J, Taleban S. Healthcare maintenance in elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Ann Gastroenterol 2017; 30:273-286. [PMID: 28469357 PMCID: PMC5411377 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2017.0130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 01/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The increasing number of older patients (age ≥60 years) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) highlights the importance of healthcare maintenance in this vulnerable population. Older IBD patients are more susceptible and have higher rates of many disease- and treatment-related adverse effects. Compared to younger IBD patients, older patients are at increased risk for infection, malignancy, bone disease, eye disease, malnutrition and thrombotic complications. Preventive strategies in the elderly differ from those in younger adults and are imperative. Changes to the immune system with aging can decrease the efficacy of vaccinations. Cancer screening guidelines in older IBD patients have to account for unique considerations, such as life expectancy, functional performance status, multimorbidity, financial status, and patient desires. Additionally, providers need to be vigilant in screening for osteoporosis, ocular disease, depression, and adverse events arising from polypharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manish P Shrestha
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona (Manish P. Shrestha)
| | - Joannie Ruel
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (Joannie Ruel)
| | - Sasha Taleban
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona (Sasha Taleban).,Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Center of Aging, Tucson, Arizona (Sasha Taleban), USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Immunogenicity of Pertussis Booster Vaccination in Children and Adolescents with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Controlled Study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2017; 23:847-852. [PMID: 28394806 DOI: 10.1097/mib.0000000000001076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data on antibody response to vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this study, we aimed to assess the immunogenicity of a booster dose of pertussis vaccine in pediatric patients with IBD and to compare their response with healthy controls. METHODS We performed a multicenter, prospective, and controlled trial. Eligible for inclusion were children and adolescents (11-18 year olds), with no history of pertussis booster immunization after the age of 6 years or history of pertussis. Study population was divided into 4 groups: patients with IBD receiving no immunosuppressive therapy (group 1), those on thiopurines only (group 2), those on thiopurines and TNF-α agents (group 3), and healthy controls (group 4). Patients and controls received 1 dose of pertussis vaccine intramuscularly and were asked to record adverse effects for 3 days after vaccination. The primary outcome measure was adequate vaccine response, defined as the concentration of anti-Bordetella pertussis antibodies >11 μg/mL, measured between 4 and 8 weeks after the vaccination. RESULTS In total, 138 subjects (111 patients and 27 controls) were enrolled in the study. Rates of adequate vaccine response did not differ among the 4 study groups (P = 0.11). Moreover, those patients with IBD who were on immunosuppressive therapy did not differ from those who were not (90.6% versus 88.2%, P = 0.37). No serious adverse effects in relation to the administration of vaccine were noted. CONCLUSIONS Booster dose of pertussis vaccine was immunogenic and safe in pediatric patients with IBD.
Collapse
|
25
|
Cleveland NK, Rodriquez D, Wichman A, Pan I, Melmed GY, Rubin DT. Many Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Are Not Immune to Measles or Pertussis. Dig Dis Sci 2016; 61:2972-2976. [PMID: 27557706 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-016-4275-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2016] [Accepted: 08/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current guidelines emphasize vaccination for influenza and pneumococcus for IBD patients and the avoidance of live virus vaccines for those who are on immunosuppressive (ISS) therapy. Given the recent resurgence of measles and pertussis infections, we assessed the immune status of our IBD population in order to advise about these risks. METHODS We prospectively collected measles and pertussis titers in our IBD patients from February 1-May 1, 2015. Immune status based on standard threshold values was determined: measles antibodies ≤0.8 antibody index (AI) = negative immunity, 0.9-1.1 AI = equivocal immunity and titers ≥1.2 AI = positive immunity. For pertussis immunity, anti-pertussis antibodies ≤5 IU/mL were considered negative immunity. Univariate analysis was performed to examine predictive factors including age, disease duration, and current medical therapies. RESULTS A total of 122 patients' titers were assessed (77 Crohn's disease, 1 indeterminate colitis, and 45 ulcerative colitis). Sixteen (13.1 %) patients lacked detectable immunity to measles, and four (3 %) had equivocal immunity. Twelve (75 %) of the measles non-immune patients were on ISS therapy versus 65 (64 %) of 102 immune patients (OR 1.7, 95 % CI 0.5-5.9, p = 0.34). Out of 96 patients, 58 (60 %) were not immune to pertussis. Disease duration ≥10 years and age ≥50 were associated with significant lower measles titers. CONCLUSIONS A significant number of our IBD patients lack immunity to measles, and a majority of our IBD patients do not have detectable immunity to pertussis. Importantly, the majority of the measles non-immune patients are on ISS therapy and therefore unable to receive a booster.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dylan Rodriquez
- University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Alana Wichman
- University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Isabella Pan
- University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Gil Y Melmed
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David T Rubin
- University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Caldera F, Saha S, Ley D, Hayney MS. Vaccination of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2016; 56:591-3. [PMID: 27594110 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2016] [Accepted: 07/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|