A Comparative Analysis of Online Medical Record Utilization and Perception by Cancer Survivorship

Exploring potential drivers of patient engagement with their health data through digital platforms: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Patient engagement when providing patient access to health data results from an interaction between the available tools and individual capabilities. The recent digital advancements of the healthcare field have altered the manifestation and importance of patient engagement. However, a comprehensive assessment of what factors contribute to patient engagement remain absent. In this review article, we synthesised the most frequently discussed factors that can foster patient engagement with their health data.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar. Relevant data were synthesized within 7 layers using a thematic analysis: (1) social and demographic factors, (2) patient ability factors, (3) patient motivation factors, (4) factors related to healthcare professionals' attitudes and skills, (5) health system factors, (6) technological factors, and (7) policy factors.

RESULTS

We identified 5801 academic and 200 Gy literature records, and included 292 (4.83%) in this review. Overall, 44 factors that can affect patient engagement with their health data were extracted. We extracted 6 social and demographic factors, 6 patient ability factors, 12 patient motivation factors, 7 factors related to healthcare professionals' attitudes and skills, 4 health system factors, 6 technological factors, and 3 policy factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving patient engagement with their health data enables the development of patient-centered healthcare, though it can also exacerbate existing inequities. While expanding patient access to health data is an important step towards fostering shared decision-making in healthcare and subsequently empowering patients, it is important to ensure that these developments reach all sectors of the community.

Disparities and Determinants of Online Medical Record Access among Cancer Survivors

Access to online medical records (OMRs) can help enhance cancer patient engagement and improve their health outcomes. This study investigates disparities in OMR access among cancer survivors and examines the association between OMR access and health perceptions. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) from 2017 to 2022. The sample included 4713 cancer survivors. We employed regression analysis to assess the associations between the different factors. Overall, 18.78% of participants accessed their OMRs once or twice, while 36.69% accessed them three times or more. Gender minority groups (β = -0.0038, p = 0.01), older adults (β = -0.1126, p < 0.001), and racial minority groups (β = -0.059, p < 0.001) were less likely to access their OMRs. Additionally, higher education levels (β = 0.274, p < 0.001), insurance coverage (β = 0.365, p < 0.001), and higher incomes (β = 0.115, p < 0.001) were associated with increased OMR access. Positive health perceptions were significantly associated with OMR usage, including perceived good health (β = 0.148, p < 0.001), quality of care (β = 0.15, p = 0.026), and self-efficacy (β = 0.178, p = 0.002). Disparities in OMR access among cancer survivors are influenced by socio-economic factors and health perceptions. Interventions targeting vulnerable groups, enhancing digital health literacy, and improving health perceptions could promote equitable OMR usage.

Frequent and diverse use of electronic health records in the United States: A trend analysis of national surveys

Objective

Considering the increasing integration of electronic health records (EHRs) into medical practice by healthcare organizations, it is especially pertinent to understand its actual usage by the general public in recent years. This study aims to explore factors associated with the frequency and diversity of EHR usage in the United States over time.

Methods

We analyzed three iterations (2017, 2018, and 2019) of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). HINTS is a national cross-sectional survey conducted by the National Cancer Institute to document attitudes and perceptions about health information access and use among American adults.

Results

Both frequency and diversity of EHR usage have slightly increased across the years. However, its overall usage still remained low. Three technology-related enablers (access to digital devices, access to the Internet, and perceived usefulness of EHRs) were positively related to EHR usage in all three iterations. In addition, perceived health status was a constant and negative predictor of EHR usage over years. Doctor–patient communication was positively associated with the frequency of EHR usage in two survey waves.

Conclusions

More initiatives to increase EHR usage in the United States are needed. We advocate for providing affordable Internet access and smartphone to underserved populations; in medical encounters, doctors should have more patient-centered communication, introduce the benefits of EHRs to patients, and promote EHR adoption in terms of frequency and diversity.

Use of Online Medical Records to Support Medical Decision Making: A Cross-Sectional Study of US Adults

The use of online medical records has increased over time and may enhance patient involvement in medical decisions. We explored sociodemographic, medical condition, and digital health correlates of using online medical records to support medical decision making. Cross-sectional data from the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5, Cycle 3, N = 5438) were analyzed. Final analyses included participants who accessed their online medical records within 12 months and had complete data for all variables (n = 1807). The outcome was, "In the past 12 months have you used your online medical record to help you make a decision about how to treat an illness or condition (yes/no)?" Univariate and multivariate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Multivariately, the odds of using online medical records to support medical decision making were significantly higher for individuals who (a) used online medical records to securely send messages to health care providers, (b) used a smartphone health app to access their online medical records, (c) had online medical records that contained clinical notes, (d) reported that online medical records were useful for monitoring health, and (e) self-identified as African American, Asian, or "Other." Online medical records may support medical decision making depending on the context.