1
|
Combet-Curt V, Buchalet C, Malicot KL, Lemanski C, Deshayes E, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Lièvre A, Huguet F, Tlili G, Vendrely V. Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT Assessment After Radiotherapy of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus in Patients from the National Multicentric Cohort FFCD-ANABASE. J Nucl Med 2024:jnumed.124.267626. [PMID: 38936973 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT qualitative assessment in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS), colostomy-free survival (CFS), and overall survival (OS) after radiation therapy (RT) of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). Secondary objectives were to evaluate the prognostic value of baseline and posttherapeutic quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in terms of RFS, CFS, and OS. Methods: We included all consecutive patients from the French multicentric cohort FFCD-ANABASE who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT at baseline and 4-6 mo after RT or chemoradiotherapy for a localized SCCA. Qualitative assessments separated patients with complete metabolic response (CMR) and non-CMR. Quantitative parameters were measured on baseline and posttreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT. RFS, CFS, and OS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations among qualitative assessments, quantitative parameters, and RFS, CFS, and OS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Results: Among 1,015 patients treated between January 2015 and April 2020, 388 patients (300 women and 88 men) from 36 centers had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT at diagnosis and after treatment. The median age was 65 y (range, 32-90 y); 147 patients (37.9%) had an early-stage tumor and 241 patients (62.1%) had a locally advanced-stage tumor; 59 patients (15.2%) received RT, and 329 (84.8%) received chemoradiotherapy. The median follow-up was 35.5 mo (95% CI, 32.8-36.6 mo). Patients with CMR had better 3-y RFS, CFS, and OS, at 84.2% (95% CI, 77.8%-88.9%), 84.7% (95% CI, 77.2%-89.3%), and 88.6% (95% CI, 82.5%-92.7%), respectively, than did non-CMR patients, at 42.1% (95% CI, 33.4%-50.6%), 47.9% (95% CI, 38.1%-56.8%), and 63.5 (95% CI, 53.2%-72.1%), respectively (P < 0.0001). Quantitative parameters were available for 154 patients from 3 centers. The following parameters were statistically significantly associated with 3-y RFS: baseline SUVmax (primitive tumor [T]) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.1; P = 0.018]), SUVpeak (T) (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.02-1.15; P = 0.007]), MTV 41% (T) (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1-1.03; P = 0.023]), MTV 41% (lymph node [N]) (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03-1.1; P < 0.001]), MTV 41% (T + N) (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1-1.03; P = 0.005]), and posttreatment SUVmax (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.09-1.34; P < 0.001]). Conclusion: Treatment response assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT after RT for SCCA has a significant prognostic value.18F-FDG PET/CT could be useful for adapting follow-up, especially for patients with locally advanced-stage tumors. Quantitative parameters could permit identification of patients with a worse prognosis but should be evaluated in further trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Astrid Lièvre
- Hepatogastroenterology Department, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mirshahvalad SA, Mesci A, Murad V, Kohan A, Ortega C, Veit-Haibach P, Metser U. [ 18F]-FDG PET in anal canal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 51:258-277. [PMID: 37592085 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06393-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide comprehensive data on the diagnostic and prognostic value of [18F]-FDG PET (PET) in anal canal cancer patients. METHODS This study was designed following the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. For the meta-analysis, published original articles (until December 2022) that met the following criteria were included: Evaluated PET for locoregional and/or distant disease detection in patients with histopathology-proven anal canal cancer; Compared PET with a valid reference standard; Provided crude data to calculate meta-analytic estimates. Diagnostic measurements from subgroups were calculated in evaluating primary tumour detection, T stage, lymph node and distant metastases. Articles providing prognostic information on PET were also reported as a systematic review. For pooled meta-analytic calculations, the hierarchical method was used. The bivariate model was conducted to find the summary estimates. Analyses were performed using STATA 16. RESULTS After the screening, 28 studies were eligible to enter the meta-analytic calculations, and data from 15 were reported descriptively. For distinguishing T3/T4 from other T-stages, PET had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 91%(95%CI:72%-97%) and 96%(95%CI:88%-98%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting metastatic (regional and/or distant) disease were 100% (95%CI:82%-100%) and 95% (95%CI:90%-98%), respectively. For therapy response assessment, the sensitivity and specificity of PET were 96%(95%CI:78%-99%) and 86%(95%CI:75%-93%), respectively. Higher pre-treatment total metabolic tumour volume was predictive of poorer survival. Conversely, for those achieving complete metabolic response, the 2-year PFS was 94%(95%CI:91%-97%) versus 51%(95%CI:42%-59%) for others (p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION PET may be a useful tool for anal canal cancer therapy planning and provides valuable prognostic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Ali Mirshahvalad
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Aruz Mesci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Unit 504, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Vanessa Murad
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Andres Kohan
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Claudia Ortega
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Patrick Veit-Haibach
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adusumilli P, Elsayed N, Theophanous S, Samuel R, Cooper R, Casanova N, Tolan DJ, Gilbert A, Scarsbrook AF. Combined PET-CT and MRI for response evaluation in patients with squamous cell anal carcinoma treated with curative-intent chemoradiotherapy. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:5086-5096. [PMID: 35274187 PMCID: PMC8913212 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08648-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for response assessment post curative-intent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). METHODS Consecutive ASCC patients treated with curative-intent CRT at a single centre between January 2018 and April 2020 were retrospectively identified. Clinical meta-data including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were collated. Three radiologists evaluated PET-CT and MRI using qualitative response assessment criteria and agreed in consensus. Two-proportion z test was used to compare diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy). Kaplan-Meier analysis (Mantel-Cox log-rank) was performed. RESULTS MRI (accuracy 76%, PPV 44.8%, NPV 95.7%) and PET-CT (accuracy 69.3%, PPV 36.7%, NPV 91.1%) performance metrics were similar; when combined, there were statistically significant improvements (accuracy 94.7%, PPV 78.9%, NPV 100%). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significant differences in PFS between responders and non-responders at PET-CT (p = 0.007), MRI (p = 0.005), and consensus evaluation (p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis of PFS demonstrated a lower hazard ratio (HR) and narrower 95% confidence intervals for consensus findings (HR = 0.093, p < 0.001). Seventy-five patients, of which 52 (69.3%) were females, with median follow-up of 17.8 months (range 5-32.6) were included. Fifteen of the 75 (20%) had persistent anorectal and/or nodal disease after CRT. Three patients died, median time to death 6.2 months (range 5-18.3). CONCLUSION Combined PET-CT and MRI response assessment post-CRT better predicts subsequent outcome than either modality alone. This could have valuable clinical benefits by guiding personalised risk-adapted patient follow-up. KEY POINTS • MRI and PET-CT performance metrics for assessing response following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) were similar. • Combined MRI and PET-CT treatment response assessment 3 months after CRT in patients with ASCC was demonstrated to be superior to either modality alone. • A combined MRI and PET-CT assessment 3 months after CRT in patients with ASCC has the potential to improve accuracy and guide optimal patient management with a greater ability to predict outcome than either modality alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratik Adusumilli
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Noha Elsayed
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Stelios Theophanous
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robert Samuel
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Rachel Cooper
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Nathalie Casanova
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Damien J. Tolan
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew F. Scarsbrook
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St James’s University Hospital, Level 1, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS9 7TF UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith D, Joon DL, Knight K, Sim J, Schneider M, Lau E, Foroudi F, Khoo V. A pilot study investigating the role of 18 F-FDG-PET in the early identification of chemoradiotherapy response in anal cancer. J Med Radiat Sci 2022; 69:439-447. [PMID: 35906833 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anal cancer (AC) is 18 F-FDG-PET avid and has been used to evaluate treatment response several months after chemoradiotherapy. This pilot study aimed to assess the utility of semi-automated contouring methods and quantitative measures of treatment response using 18 F-FDG-PET imaging at the early time point of 1-month post-chemoradiotherapy. METHODS Eleven patients with AC referred for chemoradiotherapy were prospectively enrolled into this study, with 10 meeting eligibility requirements. 18 F-FDG-PET imaging was obtained pre-chemoradiotherapy (TP1), and then 1-month (TP2), 3-6 months (TP3) and 9-12 months (TP4) post-chemoradiotherapy. Manual and semi-automated (Threshold) contouring methods were used to define the primary tumour on all 18 F-FDG-PET images. Resultant contours from each method were interrogated using quantitative measures, including volume, response index (RI), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), SUVmax , SUVmedian and SUVmean . Response was assessed quantitatively as reductions in these measures and also qualitatively against established criteria. RESULTS Nine patients were qualitatively classified as complete metabolic responders at TP2 and all 10 at TP3. All quantitative measures demonstrated significant (P < 0.05) reductions at TP2 for both Manual and Threshold methods. All reduced further at TP3 and again at TP4 for Threshold methods. TLG showed the highest reduction at all post-chemoradiotherapy time points and classified the most responders for each method at each time point. All patients are recurrence-free at minimum 4-year follow-up. CONCLUSION Based on our small sample size, semi-automated methods of disease definition using 18 F-FDG-PET imaging are feasible and appear to facilitate quantitative response classification of AC as early as 1-month post-chemoradiotherapy. Early identification of treatment response may potentially improve disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drew Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daryl Lim Joon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kellie Knight
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jenny Sim
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michal Schneider
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eddie Lau
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jayaprakasam VS, Paroder V, Schöder H. Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers. Semin Nucl Med 2021; 51:485-501. [PMID: 33965198 PMCID: PMC8338802 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
In the past two decades, PET/CT has become an essential modality in oncology increasingly used in the management of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Most PET/CT tracers used in clinical practice show some degree of GI uptake. This uptake is quite variable and knowledge of common patterns of biodistribution of various radiotracers is helpful in clinical practice. 18F-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose (FDG) is the most commonly used radiotracer and has quite a variable uptake within the bowel. 68Ga-Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) shows intense uptake within the proximal small bowel loops. 11C-methyl-L-methionine (MET) shows high accumulation within the bowels, which makes it difficult to assess bowel or pelvic diseases. One must also be aware of technical artifacts causing difficulties in interpretations, such as high attenuation oral contrast material within the bowel lumen or misregistration artifact due to patient movements. It is imperative to know the common variants and benign diseases that can mimic malignant pathologies. Intense FDG uptake within the esophagus and stomach may be a normal variant or may be associated with benign conditions such as esophagitis, reflux disease, or gastritis. Metformin can cause diffuse intense uptake throughout the bowel loops. Intense physiologic uptake can also be seen within the anal canal. Segmental bowel uptake can be seen in inflammatory bowel disease, radiation, or medication induced enteritis/colitis or infection. Diagnosis of appendicitis or diverticular disease requires CT correlation, as normal appendix or diverticulum can show intense uptake. Certain malignant pathologies are known to have only low FDG uptake, such as early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, mucinous tumors, indolent lymphomas, and multicystic mesotheliomas. Response assessment, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, can be limited by post-treatment inflammatory changes. Post-operative complications such as abscess or fistula formation can also show intense uptake and may obscure underlying malignant pathology. In the absence of clinical suspicion or rising tumor marker, the role of FDG PET/CT in routine surveillance of patients with GI malignancy is not clear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Body Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND US health care is increasingly defined by over expenditure and inefficiency. Optimizing patient follow-up is critical, especially in cancers treated with high control rates. To optimize patient care, this study assessed time to disease recurrence or toxicity in patients with anal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS In total, 140 patients with biopsy-proven, nonmetastatic anal carcinoma, treated with chemoradiation utilizing intensity-modulated radiation therapy, were identified from our institutional database. This retrospective study evaluated local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM), overall survival (OS), and late ≥grade 3 toxicity (LG3T). Patients were followed posttreatment every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months in years 3 to 5, then yearly thereafter per NCCN recommendations. RESULTS The median age and follow-up was 58 years and 27 months, respectively. Patients were categorized into high (n=61; 44%) and low (n=77; 55%) risk groups based on stage. The 2-year LC, DMFS, and OS were 93%, 94%, and 89% and 5-year LC, DMFS, OS were 92%, 87%, and 85%, respectively. Overall, there were 29 events (9 LR, 11 DM, and 9 LG3T), with 62% of events occurring within year 1 and 79% within 2 years. Stratified by event type, at 2 years 89% of LR, 64% of DM, and 89% LG3T were identified. At the remaining follow-up points, the event incidence rate was 1.3%. CONCLUSION With the majority of recurrences/toxicities occurring within the first 2 years, a reduction in follow-up during years 3 to 5 may provide adequate surveillance. Revisions of the current recommendations could maximize resources while improving patient quality of life.
Collapse
|
8
|
Russo S, Anker CJ, Abdel-Wahab M, Azad N, Bianchi N, Das P, Dragovic J, Goodman KA, Jones W, Kennedy T, Kumar R, Lee P, Sharma N, Small W, Suh WW, Jabbour SK. Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Treatment of Anal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:591-605. [PMID: 31288054 PMCID: PMC11101015 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Russo
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals, Cleveland Ohio
| | | | - May Abdel-Wahab
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Human Health, New York City, New York
| | - Nilofer Azad
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nancy Bianchi
- University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Prajnan Das
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - William Jones
- UT Health Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Rachit Kumar
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Percy Lee
- University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Navesh Sharma
- Milton S. Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | - W Warren Suh
- Ridley-Tree Cancer Center, Sansum Clinic, Santa Barbara, California
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dapper H, Schiller K, Münch S, Peeken JC, Borm K, Weber W, Combs SE. Have we achieved adequate recommendations for target volume definitions in anal cancer? A PET imaging based patterns of failure analysis in the context of established contouring guidelines. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:742. [PMID: 31357959 PMCID: PMC6664500 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5970-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are different contouring guidelines for the clinical target volume (CTV) in anal cancer (AC) which vary concerning recommendations for radiation margins in different anatomical regions, especially on inguinal site. PET imaging has become more important in primary staging of AC as a very sensitive method to detect lymph node (LN) metastases. Using PET imaging, we evaluated patterns of LN spread, and examined the differences of the respective contouring guidelines on the basis of our results. Methods We carried out a retrospective study of thirty-seven AC patients treated with chemoradiation (CRT) who underwent FDG-PET imaging for primary staging in our department between 2011 and 2018. Patients showing PET positive LN were included in this analysis. Using a color code, LN metastases of all patients were delineated on a template with “standard anatomy” and were divided indicating whether their location was in- or out-field of the standard CTV as recommended by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (AGITG) or the British National Guidance (BNG). Furthermore, a detailed analysis of the location of LN of the inguinal region was performed. Results Twenty-two out of thirty-seven AC patients with pre-treatment PET imaging had PET positive LN metastases, accumulating to a total of 154 LN. The most commonly affected anatomical region was inguinal (49 LN, 32%). All para-rectal, external/internal iliac, and pre-sacral LN were covered by the recommended CTVs of the three different guidelines. Of forty-nine involved inguinal LN, fourteen (29%), seven (14%) and five (10%) were situated outside of the recommended CTVs by RTOG, AGITG and BNG. Inguinal LN could be located up to 5.7 cm inferiorly to the femoral saphenous junction and 2.8 cm medial or laterally to the big femoral vessels. Conclusion Pelvis-related, various recommendations are largely consistent, and all LN are covered by the recommended CTVs. LN “misses” appear generally cranially (common iliac or para-aortic) or caudally (inguinal) to the recommended CTVs. The established guidelines differ significantly, particular regarding the inguinal region. Based on our results, we presented our suggestions for CTV definition of the inguinal region. LN involvement of a larger number of patients should be investigated to enable final recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hendrik Dapper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Kilian Schiller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Münch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute for innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kai Borm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute for innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for Anal Squamous Cell Cancers (Revised 2018). Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61:755-774. [PMID: 29878949 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|