The new perspective of PET/CT for axillary nodal staging in early breast cancer patients according to ACOSOG Z0011 trial PET/CT axillary staging according to Z0011

Prediction of the axillary lymph-node metastatic burden of breast cancer by 18F-FDG PET/CT-based radiomics

BACKGROUND

The axillary lymph-node metastatic burden is closely associated with treatment decisions and prognosis in breast cancer patients. This study aimed to explore the value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics in combination with ultrasound and clinical pathological features for predicting axillary lymph-node metastatic burden in breast cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted and involved 124 patients with pathologically confirmed early-stage breast cancer who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT examination. The ultrasound, PET/CT, and clinical pathological features of all patients were analysed, and radiomic features from PET images were extracted to establish a multi-parameter predictive model.

RESULTS

The ultrasound lymph-node positivity rate and PET lymph-node positivity rate in the high nodal burden group were significantly higher than those in the low nodal burden group (χ2 = 19.867, p < 0.001; χ2 = 33.025, p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in the PET-based radiomics score (RS) for predicting axillary lymph-node burden between the high and low lymph-node burden groups. (-1.04 ± 0.41 vs. -1.47 ± 0.41, t = -4.775, p < 0.001). The ultrasound lymph-node positivity (US_LNM) (odds ratio [OR] = 3.264, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.022-10.423), PET lymph-node positivity (PET_LNM) (OR = 14.242, 95% CI = 2.960-68.524), and RS (OR = 5.244, 95% CI = 3.16-20.896) are all independent factors associated with high lymph-node burden (p < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the multi-parameter (MultiP) model was 0.895, which was superior to those of US_LNM, PET_LNM, and RS models (AUC = 0.703, 0.814, 0.773, respectively), with statistically significant differences (Z = 2.888, 3.208, 3.804, respectively; p = 0.004, 0.002, < 0.001, respectively). Decision curve analysis indicated that the MultiP model provided a higher net benefit for all patients.

CONCLUSION

A MultiP model based on PET-based radiomics was able to effectively predict axillary lymph-node metastatic burden in breast cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT05826197) on May 7, 2023.

Therapeutic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging in patients with clinical stage I and IIA, HER2-positive, or triple-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

While 18F-FDG PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT) is consensual for clinical stage ≥ IIB breast cancers (BC), its benefit for stage I or IIA HER2+ or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients lacks sufficient evidence. We reported a single-institution, retrospective study evaluating FDG-PET/CT impact on patient management and staging for stage I or IIA HER2+ or Triple-Negative BC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent FDG-PET/CT staging before any treatment between January 2015 and December 2020 at Oscar Lambret Center were included.

EXCLUSIONS

patients with symptoms or conventional imaging suggestive of metastatic dissemination, or with prior malignancies. Initial stage was determined from mammography, breast ultrasound, breast MRI, and clinical examination. Staging and therapeutic impact based on FDG-PET/CT findings collected, including intra- (modification of dose/site/strategy in a type of management previously indicated) and inter-modality (modification of planned treatment strategy) changes.

RESULTS

The cohort included 287 female patients with clinical stage I or IIA, HER2+ , or TNBC. Therapeutic impact observed for 18% of patients (n = 52), with 2% (n = 7) undergoing inter-modality change with omission of planned surgery. The impact on patient management was higher for stage IIA patients (20%, 47/237) than for stage I patients (10%, 5/50). Among stage IIA disease, changes in management were more important for T2N0 patients (22%, 44/205) than for T1N1 patients (9%, 3/32). While not statistically significant, trends suggest usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for T2N0 patients.

CONCLUSION

Considering substantial therapeutic implications, our study suggests the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for patients with stage IIA, HER2-positive, or Triple-Negative BC with tumor size > 2 cm (T2N0).

Current Role and Future Prospects of Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) in the Management of Breast Cancer

Breast cancer has become the most diagnosed cancer in women globally, with 2.3 million new diagnoses each year. Accurate early staging is essential for improving survival rates with metastatic spread from loco regional to distant metastasis, decreasing mortality rates by 50%. Current guidelines do not advice the routine use of positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) in the staging of early breast cancer in the absence of symptoms. However, there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that the use of PET-CT in this early stage can benefit the patient by improving staging and as a result treatment and outcomes, as well as psychological burden, without increasing costs to the health service. Ongoing research in PET radiomics and artificial intelligence is showing promising future prospects in its use in diagnosis, staging, prognostication, and assessment of responses to the treatment of breast cancer. Furthermore, ongoing research to address current limitations of PET-CT by improving techniques and tracers is encouraging. In this narrative review, we aim to evaluate the current evidence of the usefulness of PET-CT in the management of breast cancer in different settings along with its future prospects, including the use of artificial intelligence (AI), radiomics, and novel tracers.

Breast Cancer Systemic Staging (Comparison of Computed Tomography, Bone Scan, and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography)

After an overview of the principles of bone scintigraphy, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT, the advantages and limits of these modalities in the staging of breast cancer are discussed in this paper. CT and PET/CT are not optimal for delineating primary tumor volume, and PET is less efficient than the sentinel node biopsy to depict small axillary lymph node metastases. In large breast cancer tumor, FDG PET/CT is useful to show extra-axillary lymph nodes. FDG PET/CT is superior to bone scan and CE-CT in detecting distant metastases, and it results in a change of treatment plan in nearly 15% of patients.

A nomogram for predicting three or more axillary lymph node involvement before breast cancer surgery

Based on the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG)-Z0011, a useful nomogram has been constructed to identify patients who do not require intraoperative frozen sections to evaluate sentinel lymph nodes in the previous study. This study investigated the developed nomogram by ultrasonography (US) and positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) as a modality. In the training set, 89/1030 (8.6%) patients had three or more positive nodes. Larger tumor size, higher grade ultrasonographic ALN classification, and findings suspicious of positive ALN on PET/CT were associated in multivariate analysis. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the nomogram were 0.856 [95% CI 0.815-0.897] in the training set. The AUC in the validation set was 0.866 [95% CI 0.799-0.934]. Application of the nomogram to 1067 patients who met the inclusion criteria of ACOSOG-Z0011 showed that 90 (8.4%) patients had scores above the cut-off and a false-negative result was 37 (3.8%) patients. And the specificity was 93.8%, and the negative predictive value was 96.4%. The upgraded nomogram improved the predictive accuracy, using only US and PET/CT. This nomogram is useful for identifying patients who do not require intraoperative analysis of sentinel lymph nodes and considering candidates for identifying neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The patients consisted of clinical T1-2 and node-negative invasive breast cancer. The training and validation set consisted of 1030 and 781 patients, respectively. A nomogram was constructed by analyzing factors related to three or more axillary lymph node metastases. The patients who matched the ACOSOG-Z0011 criteria were selected and applied to the new nomogram.

FDG-PET/CT for Primary Staging and Detection of Recurrence of Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. Accurate baseline staging is necessary to plan optimal breast cancer management. Early detection and staging of recurrence are also essential for optimal therapeutic management. Hybrid FDG-PET/CT imaging offers high sensitivity in detecting extra axillary lymph nodes and distant metastases. Although FDG-PET/CT has some limitations for low proliferative tumors, low-grade tumors and for well-differentiated luminal breast cancer, PET/CT is useful for the initial staging of breast cancer, regardless of tumor phenotype (luminal, triple negative, or HER2+) and of tumor grade. Although FDG-PET/CT performs better for invasive ductal carcinoma (invasive carcinoma of no specific subtype), it is also helpful for staging invasive lobular carcinomas. At initial staging, FDG-PET/CT becomes very useful for staging from clinical stage IIB (T2N1 or T3N0). FDG-PET/CT could be useful in patients with clinical stage IIA (T1N1 or T2N0), but there is not enough strong evidence to recommend routine use in this subgroup. For clinical stage I (T1N0) patients, FDG-PET/CT offers no added value. In patients with recurrent breast cancer, FDG-PET/CT is more effective than conventional imaging in detecting locoregional or distant recurrence, whether suspected by clinical examination, conventional imaging, or elevation of a tumor marker (CA 15.3 or CEA). PET/CT is effective even in the presence of normal tumor markers. PET/CT is also a powerful imaging modality for performing a whole-body workup of a known recurrence and for determining whether or not the recurrence is isolated.