Gastroesophageal reflux disease-related and functional heartburn: pathophysiology and treatment

Comparative clinical feasibility of antireflux mucosectomy and antireflux mucosal ablation in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

No definitive treatment has been established for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and antireflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) using argon plasma coagulation are promising methods. However, no study has compared these two. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the two procedures.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included 274 patients; 96 and 178 patients underwent ARMA and ARMS, respectively. The primary outcome was subjective symptom improvement based on GERD questionnaire (GERDQ) scores. The secondary outcomes included changes in the presence of Barrett's esophagus, Los Angeles grade for reflux esophagitis, flap valve grade, and proton pump inhibitor withdrawal rates.

RESULTS

The ARMS group had higher baseline GERDQ scores (10.0 vs. 8.0, P < 0.001) and a greater median postprocedure improvement than the ARMA group (4.0 vs. 2.0, P = 0.002), and even after propensity score matching adjustment, these findings remained. ARMS significantly improved reflux esophagitis compared with ARMA, with notable changes in Los Angeles grade (P < 0.001) and flap valve grade scores (P < 0.001). Improvement in Barrett's esophagus was comparable between the groups (P = 0.337), with resolution rates of 94.7% and 77.8% in the ARMS and ARMA groups, respectively. Compared with the ARMA group, the ARMS group experienced higher bleeding rates (P = 0.034), comparable stricture rates (P = 0.957), and more proton pump inhibitor withdrawals (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Both ARMS and ARMA showed improvements in GERDQ scores, endoscopic esophagitis, flap valve grade, and the presence of Barrett's esophagus after the procedures. However, ARMS demonstrated better outcomes than ARMA in terms of both subjective and objective indicators.

Comparative evaluation of endoscopic anti-reflux mucosectomy and stretta radiofrequency ablation in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: insights from a retrospective multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) that is unresponsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain limited. Therefore, we compared the therapeutic effects of anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and Stretta radiofrequency (SRF) for intractable GERD in over 400 individuals who underwent either procedure.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study between 2016 and 2023 to evaluate the effectiveness of SRF and ARMS treatments for refractory GERD. The primary measure of success was the change in the GERD questionnaire (GERDQ) score. The secondary outcomes were various GERD-related indicators, including endoscopic Los Angeles (LA) classification, Hill's type-based flap valve grade (FVG), EndoFLIP™ distensibility index (DI), rate of PPI discontinuation, resolution rate of Barrett's esophagus, and incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

The ARMS group included patients with high GERDQ scores, FVG, LA grade, and Barrett's esophagus. Both groups had similar rates of improvements in GERDQ score (P = 0.884) and PPI withdrawal (P = 0.866); however, the ARMS group had significantly more side effects and improvements in the median change in GERDQ score (P = 0.011), FVG (P < 0.001), LA grade (P < 0.001), EndoFLIP™ DI (P < 0.001), and resolution of Barrett's esophagus (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The ARMS group had a greater GERDQ score improvement than the SRF group but had symptom relief and PPI discontinuation rates similar to those of the SRF group. However, objective measures, including EndoFLIP™ DI and endoscopic evaluations, were better in the ARMS group than in the SRF group.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Pathophysiology and New Treatment Trends

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is caused by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus due to a decline in esophageal clearance and anti-reflux barrier mechanisms. Mucosal injury is caused by a combination of gastric juice directly damaging the esophageal mucosa and the immune and inflammatory mechanism in which inflammatory cytokines released from the esophageal mucosal epithelium cause neutrophil migration, triggering inflammation. Gastric secretion inhibitors are the first-line treatment for GERD, but they can be combined with prokinetic agents and Chinese herbal remedies. However, pharmacotherapy cannot improve anatomical problems or prevent physical causes of GERD, such as reflux of non-acidic contents. Therefore, surgery can be warranted, depending on the pathology. Intraluminal endoscopic therapy, which is both less invasive and more effective than surgery, was recently developed and applied in Europe and the United States. In Japan, intraluminal endoscopic therapies, such as anti-reflux mucosectomy, anti-reflux mucosal ablation, and endoscopic submucosal dissection, for GERD have been independently developed.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lansoprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate Immediate-release Capsules in Healthy Chinese Subjects: An Open, Randomized, Controlled, Crossover, Single-, and Multiple-dose Trial

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) differ in onset of action and bioavailability. This trial was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an immediate-release capsule formulation containing lansoprazole 30 mg and sodium bicarbonate 1100 mg (T preparation) in healthy Chinese subjects. This was an open, single-center, randomized, single and multiple oral doses, and two-period crossover study in 30 healthy subjects. After single- and multiple-dose oral administration, blood samples were obtained and lansoprazole concentration in serum was measured for pharmacokinetic analysis. Meanwhile, the intragastric pH was monitored continuously to evaluate the pharmacodynamics of the investigational drugs. The Tmax of the T preparation was 0.5 hours, while the Tmax of the R preparation was 1.5 hours after multiple doses, which indicated that the absorption speed of the T preparation was significantly faster than that of the R preparation. The same characteristics also existed after single-dose administration. The area under the curve (AUC)ss of the T preparation was bio-equivalent to that of the R preparation under steady state. The time percentage of intragastric pH > 4.0 for the T preparation was higher than that of the R preparation after 1 hour for both single- and multiple-dose. It suggested compared with R preparation, the time percentage of intragastric pH > 4.0 met the criteria for superiority after 1 hour administration for the T preparation. In addition, no serious adverse events occurred in this study. Across this study, the T preparation was better than the R preparation at improving drug absorption and increasing intragastric pH, and had a favorable safety profile.

Value of 96-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring in the assessment of patients with refractory acid reflux symptoms and their response to anti-reflux diet

Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is a diagnostic tool in patients with heartburn and regurgitation. The aim of this study is to evaluate 96-hour esophageal pH monitoring in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), at baseline and under diet that impedes GER. We hypothesized that diet would potentially reduce pathologic acid exposure time (AET). Retrospective series of 88 patients with GERD undergoing wireless 96-hour pH monitoring. Two-day (48 hours) tandem periods, one on liberal, followed by another on restricted diet assessed esophageal AET. Primary end point was >30% reduction in AET while on anti-GER diet. Of the 88 patients, 16 were excluded because of probe migration. Endoscopy and biopsies assessed erosive esophagitis (EE) and Barrett's esophagus (BE), or normal esophagus. Abnormal AET (% pH < 4.0 ≥ 6) further defined nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), whereas normal AET (% pH < 4.0 < 6) with normal endoscopy defined patients as functional heartburn (FH). There were 6 patients with EE (n = 5) and BE (n = 1), 23 with NERD and 43 with FH. Anti-GER diet led to >30% reduction in AET in EE and NERD patients, but not in those with FH. Most patients (n = 43/72; 60%) had FH and could have avoided acid suppression. Furthermore, (14/23; 61%) of patients with NERD completely normalized AET with diet, potentially negating acid suppression. Ninety-six-hour esophageal pH distinguishes GERD patients from those with FH. Fifty percent of EE/BE patients and 61% of those with NERD completely normalize AET with diet. If pathologic AET occurs despite diet, acid suppression is indicated.

Effect of Restraint Stress on Pain Sensitivity, Spinal Trigeminal Nucleus Neurons, and Astrocytes in the Masseter Area of Rats

To explore the changes of pain sensitivity (PS) in the masseter area (MA) in the rat model of psychological stress and the mechanism of action between spinal nucleus neurons and astrocytes in the trigeminal ganglion. The 40 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into control group (no treatment), group A (restraint stress (RS) 1 d), group B (RS 7 d), and group C (RS 14 d). The body weight growth rates (WGR) of rats in each group were compared and the difference of CORT and ACTH in serum was analyzed by ELISA. The open field test and the elevated “cross” maze test were adopted to detect the behavioral changes of rats. Finally, pain threshold of the MA in rats, the activation amount of brain tissue medulla oblongata parts astrocytes markers Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and the protein expression of IL-1β and IL-1RI were detected. The results showed the WGR at 7 d and 14 d was greatly lower than control group (P < 0.01). In addition, the activity level and serum CORT and ACTH levels AND mean pain threshold in the MA of groups B and C were greatly lower than control group (P < 0.05). The activation rate of GFRP in group C (P < 0.01) and the protein expression of IL-1β and IL-1RI (P < 0.05) in rat trigeminal ganglion astrocytes of groups B and C was greatly higher than control group, indicating the increase of RS time, the release of IL-1β and IL-1RI can activate neurons and astrocytes in spinal trigeminal nucleus (STN) nerve and increase the PS of the MA.

Kyoto international consensus report on anatomy, pathophysiology and clinical significance of the gastro-oesophageal junction

OBJECTIVE

An international meeting was organised to develop consensus on (1) the landmarks to define the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ), (2) the occurrence and pathophysiological significance of the cardiac gland, (3) the definition of the gastro-oesophageal junctional zone (GOJZ) and (4) the causes of inflammation, metaplasia and neoplasia occurring in the GOJZ.

DESIGN

Clinical questions relevant to the afore-mentioned major issues were drafted for which expert panels formulated relevant statements and textural explanations.A Delphi method using an anonymous system was employed to develop the consensus, the level of which was predefined as ≥80% of agreement. Two rounds of voting and amendments were completed before the meeting at which clinical questions and consensus were finalised.

RESULTS

Twenty eight clinical questions and statements were finalised after extensive amendments. Critical consensus was achieved: (1) definition for the GOJ, (2) definition of the GOJZ spanning 1 cm proximal and distal to the GOJ as defined by the end of palisade vessels was accepted based on the anatomical distribution of cardiac type gland, (3) chemical and bacterial (Helicobacter pylori) factors as the primary causes of inflammation, metaplasia and neoplasia occurring in the GOJZ, (4) a new definition of Barrett's oesophagus (BO).

CONCLUSIONS

This international consensus on the new definitions of BO, GOJ and the GOJZ will be instrumental in future studies aiming to resolve many issues on this important anatomic area and hopefully will lead to better classification and management of the diseases surrounding the GOJ.

Network Meta-analysis Comparing Vonoprazan and Proton Pump Inhibitors for Heartburn Symptoms in Erosive Esophagitis

GOALS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the relative efficacy of vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on early heartburn symptom resolution in patients with erosive esophagitis.

BACKGROUND

Limited available data directly compare the efficacy of vonoprazan, a first-in-class potassium-competitive acid blocker, with PPIs in erosive esophagitis.

STUDY

We conducted a systematic literature review (in MEDLINE and CENTRAL) and subsequent network meta-analysis according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. Double-blind, randomized controlled trials in adults with erosive esophagitis treated with vonoprazan or a PPI were included in the analysis. Primary outcomes were heartburn symptom resolution rate on Day 1 and Day 7. The study was performed with all available data, using a random effects model within a Bayesian framework.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 randomized controlled trials were included in the network meta-analysis. For heartburn resolution rate on Day 1 (9 of 10 trials), vonoprazan 20 mg once daily (QD) was superior to placebo (median odds ratio=16.75, 95% credible interval: 2.16-207.80). Point estimates numerically favored vonoprazan 20 mg QD over other comparators. For heartburn resolution rate on Day 7 (10 of 10 trials), vonoprazan 20 mg QD was superior to placebo and other comparators except rabeprazole 20 mg QD. Point estimates numerically favored vonoprazan 20 mg QD over rabeprazole 20 mg QD.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, vonoprazan 20 mg QD was equally effective in heartburn resolution on Day 1, and equally or more effective on Day 7 versus PPIs in adults with erosive esophagitis.

Efficacy of rikkunshito in patients with functional heartburn: a prospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

Although the efficacy of rikkunshito in patients with treatment-resistant non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) has been reported, it is unclear for which subgroups of NERD patients (per the Rome IV criteria) rikkunshito is effective. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of rikkunshito in patients with functional heartburn.

METHODS

Ten patients with functional heartburn who experienced symptoms of dyspepsia were enrolled. The patients were administered rikkunshito for 8 weeks. The frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG), Japanese translation of quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia questionnaire (QOLRAD-J), and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) were evaluated before and 4 and 8 weeks after administration. Overall treatment efficacy (OTE) was evaluated 8 weeks after administration.

RESULTS

One patient was discontinued 4 weeks after administration because of voluntary withdrawal. Total FSSG score was significantly (P = 0.039) lower 8 weeks after treatment or at discontinuation (13.2 ± 8.0) than before treatment (18.3 ± 10.7). Although QOLRAD-J score tended to increase 8 weeks after treatment or at discontinuation compared with before treatment, no significant difference was observed. HADS score did not decrease significantly 8 weeks after treatment or at discontinuation compared with before treatment. However, a correlation was found between total FSSG and HADS anxiety scores (correlation coefficient: 0.684, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first study to investigate the efficacy of rikkunshito in patients with functional heartburn. Rikkunshito may be effective in these patients.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Esomeprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate Immediate-Release Capsules in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: A Cross-Over, Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Esomeprazole delayed release tablets (ESO) are one of the most effective treatments for acid-related disorders. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of an immediate-release capsule formulation containing esomeprazole 20 mg and sodium bicarbonate 1100 mg (IR-ESO) compared to those of the esomeprazole delayed release tablet 20 mg (ESO). In addition, the impact of CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms on PK and PD was evaluated.

METHODS

A single-center, open-label, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, and 2-period crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy Chinese subjects. Subjects received either IR-ESO or ESO for 5 days. After single- and multiple-dosing administration, blood samples were collected for PK analysis, and intragastric pH was assessed by 24-h pH monitoring. The CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms were analyzed by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) [GMR (95%CI)] of IR-ESO/ESO for AUC_inf [single dose: 103.60% (96.58%, 111.14%), multiple doses: 101.65% (97.88%, 105.57%)] were within the range of 80.00-125.00%. The AUC_inf showed an increasing trend between CYP2C19 extensive metabolizer (EM), intermediate metabolizer (IM), and poor metabolizer (PM) after single-dose and multiple-dose administration (p < 0.05). The GMR (95%CI) of IR-ESO/ESO for 24-h integrated gastric acidity from baseline [single dose: 101.07% (96.56%, 105.78%), multiple doses: 101.24% (97.74%, 104.86%)] were within the range of 80.00-125.00%. The percentage changes in 24-h integrated gastric acidity from baseline was significant difference between EM, IM, and PM after single-dose IR-ESO and ESO (p < 0.05). Drugs were all well tolerated, and there were no significant differences in adverse events between IR-ESO and ESO.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that IR-ESO can inhibit the secretion of gastric acid rapidly and continuously, and that the PK and PD of IR-ESO are affected by CYP2C19 genotypes. The GMR (95% CI) of IR-ESO/ESO for AUC_inf and the percentage changes in 24-h integrated gastric acidity from baseline were all within the range of 80.00-125.00%.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900024935.

The Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis: An Understanding Based on a Common Pathologic Cascade across Multiple Organs and Additional Organ-Specific Pathologies

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multisystem autoimmune and vascular disease resulting in fibrosis of various organs with unknown etiology. Accumulating evidence suggests that a common pathologic cascade across multiple organs and additional organ-specific pathologies underpin SSc development. The common pathologic cascade starts with vascular injury due to autoimmune attacks and unknown environmental factors. After that, dysregulated angiogenesis and defective vasculogenesis promote vascular structural abnormalities, such as capillary loss and arteriolar stenosis, while aberrantly activated endothelial cells facilitate the infiltration of circulating immune cells into perivascular areas of various organs. Arteriolar stenosis directly causes pulmonary arterial hypertension, scleroderma renal crisis and digital ulcers. Chronic inflammation persistently activates interstitial fibroblasts, leading to the irreversible fibrosis of multiple organs. The common pathologic cascade interacts with a variety of modifying factors in each organ, such as keratinocytes and adipocytes in the skin, esophageal stratified squamous epithelia and myenteric nerve system in gastrointestinal tract, vasospasm of arterioles in the heart and kidney, and microaspiration of gastric content in the lung. To better understand SSc pathogenesis and develop new disease-modifying therapies, it is quite important to understand the complex pathogenesis of SSc from the two distinct perspectives, namely the common pathologic cascade and additional organ-specific pathologies.

Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease pathophysiology is multifactorial and linked to a misbalance between the aggressiveness of the refluxate into the esophagus or adjacent organs and the failure of protective mechanisms associate or not to a defective valvular mechanism at the level of the esophagogastric junction incapable of dealing with a transdiaphragmatic pressure gradient. Antireflux mechanisms include the lower esophageal sphincter and abdominal esophagus, the diaphragm, the angle of His, the Gubaroff valve, and the phrenoesophageal membrane. Protective mechanisms include esophageal motility, saliva production, and epithelial protection. Disruption of this balance occurs most commonly due to the presence of a hiatal hernia, esophageal dysmotility, a rise in abdominal pressure (obesity), and decrease in thoracic pressure (chronic lung diseases).

The Role of Esophageal Hypersensitivity in Functional Heartburn

Functional heartburn (FH) is defined as a functional esophageal disorder characterized by symptoms of chronic heartburn with no apparent correlation to acid or nonacid reflux. In addition, its symptoms persist despite the lack of organic abnormalities or inflammation, esophageal motility disorders, or metabolic disorders. Although conditions presenting with esophageal symptoms without endoscopic abnormalities were previously categorized as nonerosive reflux disease, such conditions are now classified into 3 categories under Rome IV criteria: nonerosive reflux disease, reflux hypersensitivity, and FH. Although many aspects of FH remain unclear, its onset mechanism is considered to be strongly associated with peripheral or central sensitization, given the fact that its symptoms seem to be unrelated to gastroesophageal reflux. In addition, the cause of such hypersensitivity is an interesting topic in itself, and psychological factors, such as stress followed by increasing esophageal permeability are gaining attention as factors that can potentially influence this condition. There is a great unmet clinical need for therapeutic drugs that can be used to treat FH, and the development of novel drugs, diagnostic tests and biomarkers is eagerly awaited.

The Application of the Rome IV Criteria to Functional Esophagogastroduodenal Disorders in Asia

The Rome criteria were amended as Rome IV. For functional esophageal disorders, the exclusion criteria have been more specifically revised based on further understanding of other esophageal disorders, including eosinophilic esophagitis and spastic and hypercontractile motor disorders. Another revised point is the more restrictive definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease, indicating that sensitivity to a physiological reflux burden may be placed more firmly within the functional group. For functional dyspepsia (FD), only minor changes were introduced, mainly to improve specificity. Among the major symptoms of FD, not only postprandial fullness, but also epigastric pain, epigastric burning, and early satiation should be "bothersome." Investigation on the effect of meal ingestion on symptom generation has indicated that not only postprandial fullness and early satiety, but also epigastric pain, epigastric burning sensation and nausea (not vomiting) may increase after meals. Helicobacter pylori infection is considered a possible cause of dyspepsia if successful eradication leads to sustained resolution of symptoms for more than 6 months, and such status can be termed as "H. pylori-associated dyspepsia." Prompt esophagogastroduodenoscopy and H. pylori testing and treatment would be more beneficial, especially in Asia, which has a high prevalence of gastric cancer. Acotiamide, tandospirone, and rikkunshito are the newly listed as treatment options for FD. For further therapeutic development, clinical studies based on the strict Rome IV criteria should be performed.