Tools for causality assessment in drug-induced liver disease

Safety of naltrexone in patients with cirrhosis

Background & Aims

Treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD) improves survival in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis. However, medications for alcohol use disorder (MAUD) are underutilized in this population, partially due to concerns regarding drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Our aim was to evaluate the safety of naltrexone in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of patients with cirrhosis who were prescribed naltrexone using the VOCAL (Veterans Outcomes and Costs Associated with Liver Disease) database. Patients with new initiation of naltrexone after diagnosis of cirrhosis who had liver enzymes checked within a 3-month time frame were included. A chart review was performed on patients who developed alanine aminotransferase or alkaline phosphatase elevations to more than 2× or 5× the upper limit of normal, respectively. The RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf causality assessment method) was used to determine if DILI occurred.

Results

A total of 3,285 patients with cirrhosis were initiated on naltrexone, of whom 2,940 had laboratory testing during the high-risk DILI period. Only 2% of patients had liver enzyme elevations, and among those, 30 (48%) were classified as "DILI excluded" and 32 (52%) were classified as "DILI unlikely". No patients were classified as possible, probable, or highly probable DILI. No deaths or new decompensations were attributed to naltrexone.

Conclusions

Naltrexone in patients with cirrhosis was not associated with development of DILI using RUCAM scoring. Naltrexone appears to be safe in patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis.

Impact and Implications

Naltrexone is an effective medication for treating alcohol use disorder but is underutilized in patients with underlying liver disease due to historical concerns regarding hepatotoxicity. This retrospective study shows no drug-induced liver injury in a large cohort of patients with cirrhosis with new initiation of naltrexone. This study may encourage providers to prescribe naltrexone to patients with existing liver disease with ongoing alcohol use disorder.

In Vitro Hepatotoxicity of Routinely Used Opioids and Sedative Drugs

A hepatocyte cell line was used to determine the hepatotoxicity of sedatives and opioids, as the hepatotoxicity of these drugs has not yet been well characterized. This might pose a threat, especially to critically ill patients, as they often receive high cumulative doses for daily analgosedation and often already have impaired liver function due to an underlying disease or complications during treatment. A well-established biosensor based on HepG2/C3A cells was used for the determination of the hepatotoxicity of commonly used sedatives and opioids in the intensive care setting (midazolam, propofol, s-ketamin, thiopental, fentanyl, remifentanil, and sufentanil). The incubation time was 2 × 3 days with clinically relevant (Cmax) and higher concentrations (C5× and C10×) of each drug in cell culture medium or human plasma. Afterward, we measured the cell count, vitality, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity, cytochrome P 450 1A2 (CYP1A2), and albumin synthesis. All tested substances reduced the viability of hepatocyte cells, but sufentanil and remifentanil showed more pronounced effects. The cell count was diminished by sufentanil in both the medium and plasma and by remifentanil only in plasma. Sufentanil and remifentanil also led to higher values of LDH in the cell culture supernatant. A reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity was seen with the use of midazolam and s-ketamine. Microalbumin synthesis was reduced in plasma after its incubation with higher concentrations of sufentanil and remifentanil. Remifentanil and s-ketamine reduced CYP1A2 activity, while propofol and thiopental increased it. Our findings suggest that none of the tested sedatives and opioids have pronounced hepatotoxicity. Sufentanil, remifentanil, and s-ketamine showed moderate hepatotoxic effects in vitro. These drugs should be given with caution to patients vulnerable to hepatotoxic drugs, e.g., patients with pre-existing liver disease or liver impairment as part of their underlying disease (e.g., hypoxic hepatitis or cholestatic liver dysfunction in sepsis). Further studies are indicated for this topic, which may use more complex cell culture models and global pharmacovigilance reports, addressing the limitation of the used cell model: HepG2/C3A cells have a lower metabolic capacity due to their low levels of CYP enzymes compared to primary hepatocytes. However, while the test model is suitable for parental substances, it is not for toxicity testing of metabolites.

Influence of Antibiotics on Functionality and Viability of Liver Cells In Vitro

(1) Antibiotics are an important weapon in the fight against serious bacterial infections and are considered a common cause of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The hepatotoxicity of many drugs, including antibiotics, is poorly analyzed in human in vitro models. (2) A standardized assay with a human hepatoma cell line was used to test the hepatotoxicity of various concentrations (Cmax, 5× Cmax, and 10× Cmax) of antibiotics. In an ICU, the most frequently prescribed antibiotics, ampicillin, cefepime, cefuroxime, levofloxacin, linezolid, meropenem, rifampicin, tigecycline, and vancomycin, were incubated with HepG2/C3A cells for 6 days. Cell viability (XTT assay, LDH release, and vitality), albumin synthesis, and cytochrome 1A2 activity were determined in cells. (3) In vitro, vancomycin, rifampicin, and tigecycline showed moderate hepatotoxic potential. The antibiotics ampicillin, cefepime, cefuroxime, levofloxacin, linezolid, and meropenem were associated with mild hepatotoxic reactions in test cells incubated with the testes Cmax concentration. Rifampicin and cefuroxime showed significantly negative effects on the viability of test cells. (4) Further in vitro studies and global pharmacovigilance reports should be conducted to reveal underlying mechanism of the hepatotoxic action of vancomycin, rifampicin, tigecycline, and cefuroxime, as well as the clinical relevance of these findings.

A novel quantitative computer-assisted drug-induced liver injury causality assessment tool (DILI-CAT)

Background and aims

We hypothesized that a drug’s clinical signature (or phenotype) of liver injury can be assessed and used to quantitatively develop a computer-assisted DILI causality assessment-tool (DILI-CAT). Therefore, we evaluated drug-specific DILI-phenotypes for amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMX/CLA), cefazolin, cyproterone, and Polygonum multiflorum using data from published case series, to develop DILI-CAT scores for each drug.

Methods

Drug specific phenotypes were made up of the following three clinical features: (1) latency, (2) R-value, and (3) AST/ALT ratio. A point allocation system was developed with points allocated depending on the variance from the norm (or “core”) for the 3 variables in published datasets.

Results

The four drugs had significantly different phenotypes based on latency, R-value, and AST/ALT ratio. The median cyproterone latency was 150 days versus < 43 days for the other three drugs (median: 26 for AMX/CLA, 20 for cefazolin, and 20 for Polygonum multiflorum; p<0.001). The R-value for the four drugs was also significantly different among drugs (cyproterone [median 12.4] and Polygonum multiflorum [median 10.9]) from AMX/CLA [median 1.44] and cefazolin [median 1.57; p<0.001]). DILI-CAT scores effectively separated cyproterone and Polygonum multiflorum from AMX/CLA and cefazolin, respectively (p<0.001). As expected, because of phenotypic overlap, AMX/CLA and cefazolin could not be well differentiated.

Conclusions

DILI-CAT is a data-driven, diagnostic tool built to define drug-specific phenotypes for DILI adjudication. The data provide proof of principle that a drug-specific, data-driven causality assessment tool can be developed for different drugs and raise the possibility that such a process could enhance causality assessment methods.

The Potential Role of Metabolomics in Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) Assessment

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most frequent adverse clinical reactions and a relevant cause of morbidity and mortality. Hepatotoxicity is among the major reasons for drug withdrawal during post-market and late development stages, representing a major concern to the pharmaceutical industry. The current biochemical parameters for the detection of DILI are based on enzymes (alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP)) and bilirubin serum levels that are not specific of DILI and therefore there is an increasing interest on novel, specific, DILI biomarkers discovery. Metabolomics has emerged as a tool with a great potential for biomarker discovery, especially in disease diagnosis, and assessment of drug toxicity or efficacy. This review summarizes the multistep approaches in DILI biomarker research and discovery based on metabolomics and the principal outcomes from the research performed in this field. For that purpose, we have reviewed the recent scientific literature from PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and PubTator using the terms “metabolomics”, “DILI”, and “humans”. Despite the undoubted contribution of metabolomics to our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of DILI and the identification of promising novel metabolite biomarkers, there are still some inconsistencies and limitations that hinder the translation of these research findings into general clinical practice, probably due to the variability of the methods used as well to the different mechanisms elicited by the DILI causing agent.

Challenges and Future of Drug-Induced Liver Injury Research-Laboratory Tests

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare but potentially severe adverse drug event, which is also a major cause of study cessation and market withdrawal during drug development. Since no acknowledged diagnostic tests are available, DILI diagnosis poses a major challenge both in clinical practice as well as in pharmacovigilance. Differentiation from other liver diseases and the identification of the causative agent in the case of polymedication are the main issues that clinicians and drug developers face in this regard. Thus, efforts have been made to establish diagnostic testing methods and biomarkers in order to safely diagnose DILI and ensure a distinguishment from alternative liver pathologies. This review provides an overview of the diagnostic methods used in differential diagnosis, especially with regards to autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DI-AIH), in vitro causality methods using individual blood samples, biomarkers for diagnosis and severity prediction, as well as experimental predictive models utilized in pre-clinical settings during drug development regimes.

Lipidomics Indicates the Hepatotoxicity Effects of EtOAc Extract of Rhizoma Paridis

Rhizoma Paridis is a traditional Chinese medicine commonly used in the clinical treatment of gynecological diseases. Previous studies have shown that aqueous extracts of Rhizoma Paridis exhibit some hepatotoxicity to hepatocytes. Here, using lipidomics analysis, we investigated the potential hepatotoxicity of Rhizoma Paridis and its possible mechanism. The hepatic damaging of different solvent extracts of Rhizoma Paridis on zebrafish larvae were determined by a combination of mortality dose, biochemical, morphological, and functional tests. We found that ethyl acetate extracts (AcOEtE) were the most toxic fraction. Notably, lipidomic responsible for the pharmacological effects of AcOEtE were investigated by Q-Exactive HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific high-resolution) coupled in tandem with a UHPLC system. Approximately 1958 unique spectral features were detected, of which 325 were identified as unique lipid species. Among these lipid species, phosphatidylethanolamine cardiolipin Ceramide (Cer), lysophosphatidylinositol sphingosine (Sph), etc., were significantly upregulated in the treated group. Pathway analysis indicates that Rhizoma Paridis may cause liver damage via interfering with the glycerophospholipid metabolism. Collectively, this study has revealed previously uncharacterized lipid metabolic disorder involving lipid synthesis, metabolism, and transport that functionally determines hepatic fibrosis procession.

Biomarkers of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) - a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an unpredictable event, and there are no specific biomarkers that can distinguish DILI from alternative explanations or predict its clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review summarizes the available evidence for all biomarkers proposed to have a role in the diagnosis or prognosis of DILI. Following a comprehensive search, we included all types of studies in humans. We included DILI cases based on any threshold criteria but excluded intrinsic DILI, commonly caused by paracetamol overdose. We classified studies into diagnostic and prognostic categories and assessed their methodological quality. After reviewing the literature, 14 studies were eligible.

EXPERT OPINION

Diagnostic studies were heterogeneous with regard to the study population and outcomes measured. Prognostic models were developed by integrating novel biomarkers, risk scores, and traditional biomarkers, which increased their prognostic ability to predict death or transplantation by 6 months. This systematic review highlights the case of need for non-genetic biomarkers that distinguish DILI from acute liver injury related to alternative etiology. Biomarkers with the potential to identify serious adverse outcomes from acute DILI should be validated in independent prospective cohorts with a substantial number of cases.

Herbal and dietary supplement induced liver injury: Highlights from the recent literature

Herbal-induced liver injury (HILI) is an important and increasingly concerning cause of liver toxicity, and this study presents recent updates to the literature. An extensive literature review was conducted encompassing September 2019 through March 2021. Studies with clinically significant findings were analyzed and included in this review. We emphasized those studies that provided a causality assessment methodology, such as Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method scores. Our review includes reports of individual herbals, including Garcinia cambogia, green tea extract, kratom as well as classes such as performance enhancing supplements, Traditional Chinese medicine, Ayurvedic medicine and herbal contamination. Newly described herbals include ashwagandha, boldo, skyfruit, and 'Thermo gun'. Several studies discussing data from national registries, including the United States Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) Network, Spanish DILI Registry, and Latin American DILI Network were incorporated. There has also been a continued interest in hepatoprotection, with promising use of herbals to counter hepatotoxicity from anti-tubercular medications. We also elucidated the current legal conversation surrounding use of herbals by presenting updates from the Federal Drug Administration. The highlights of the literature over the past year indicate interest in HILI that will continue as the supplement industry in the United States grows.

Monocyte-Derived Hepatocyte-Like Cell Test: A Novel Tool for in vitro Identification of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients with Herbal or Dietary Supplements

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury caused by herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) has been an increasingly important phenomenon in recent years. Diagnosis is the major challenge. Definite causality assessment, especially in patients with concomitant prescription medicine or other potential causes of liver injury, can be impossible.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the usefulness of an in vitro test on the basis of peripheral monocytes of the individual patients in patients with acute liver injury consuming HDS.

METHOD

Patients with acute liver injury who had been prospectively recruited by the University Hospital Munich (LMU, Munich) and the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) and who took at least 1 HDS were selected for this analysis. Diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) was based on local expert adjudication, Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) score, and course of the disease and was supported by the monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like (MH) cell test.

RESULTS

We identified 47 patients with liver injury and intake of at least 1 HDS: 32 (68%) were diagnosed with DILI. HDS was determined as the causative agent in 28 out of those 32 patients. The MH cell test could correctly identify 29 out of those 32 DILI cases and showed false positive results in only 2 out of the 15 non-DILI patients. The MH cell test therefore reached a sensitivity and specificity of 90.6 and 86.7%, respectively, in patients with acute liver injury and HDS intake.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data provide evidence that the MH cell test can be a useful tool to identify the role of HDS in causing DILI and therefore support causality assessment in patients consuming HDS.

Liver injury associated with drug intake during pregnancy

Drug use during pregnancy is not common. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a potential complication that is rare but can adversely affect both the mother and the fetus. Although many drugs can directly cause hepatotoxicity, idiosyncratic liver injury is common in pregnancy. Underreporting of adverse drug reactions, lack of adequate literature regarding drug safety in pregnancy, and the inherent difficulty in diagnosing DILI during pregnancy make the management of this condition challenging. This review attempts to describe the existing literature regarding DILI in pregnancy, which is mainly in the form of case reports; several studies have looked at the safety of antithyroid drugs, antiretroviral drugs, and paracetamol, which have an indication for use in pregnancy; the relevant data from these studies with regard to DILI has been presented. In addition, the review describes the diagnosis of DILI, grading the disease severity, assessment of causality linking the drug to the adverse event, regulatory guidelines for evaluating the potential of drugs to cause liver injury, efforts to ensure better participation of women in clinical trials and studies in pregnant women population in particular, and the challenges involved in generating adequate research evidence. The establishment of DILI registries in various countries is an encouraging development; however, there is a need for promoting active, spontaneous reporting of adverse events during pregnancy to ensure rapid generation of evidence regarding the safety of a drug in pregnant women.

Liver Injury Associated with Metamizole Exposure: Features of an Underestimated Adverse Event

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

The potential of metamizole to cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has received increasing attention. We investigated the distinguishing features of a case series comprising 32 patients with suspected metamizole-induced DILI.

METHODS

For the current analysis, 32 of 238 patients with DILI included in our prospective study on drugs potentially causing DILI were included. Diagnosis of DILI was based on expert opinion and RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) score and supported by an in vitro test using monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like cells.

RESULTS

Suspected metamizole-DILI was characterised by a female predominance, hepatocellular pattern of injury, high proportion of antinuclear antibody positivity, and predominance of eosinophilic cell infiltration and necrosis in the histopathological analysis. With 22%, a high proportion of these metamizole-associated liver injury cases developed acute liver failure, which was characterised by a longer latency of metamizole use and more pronounced liver biochemistry abnormalities at onset and peak levels. Furthermore, jaundice was a common finding in the metamizole-associated liver injury cases with 66% presenting with peak bilirubin levels of 3 mg/dL or higher, which was associated with a worse outcome and a higher frequency of acute liver failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis of a well-characterised DILI cohort further supports the potential of metamizole causing DILI and provides important features for the establishment of a signature pattern of liver injury observed in patients treated with metamizole.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02353455.

Drug-induced liver injury: Asia Pacific Association of Study of Liver consensus guidelines

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury mimics acute and chronic liver disease. It is under recognized and underrecognised because of the lack of pathognomonic diagnostic serological markers. Its consequences may vary from being asymptomatic to self-limiting illness to severe liver injury leading to acute liver failure. Its incidence is likely to be more common in Asia than other parts of the world, mainly because of hepatotoxicity resulting from the treatment of tuberculosis disease and the ubiquitous use of traditional and complimentary medicines in Asian countries. This APASL consensus guidelines on DILI is a concise account of the various aspects including current evidence-based information on DILI with special emphasis on DILI due to antituberculosis agents and traditional and complementary medicine use in Asia.

Antimitochondrial Rather than Antinuclear Antibodies Correlate with Severe Drug-Induced Liver Injury

INTRODUCTION

A proportion of patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) present with autoantibodies, which has led to the current concept of autoimmune-like DILI. However, no standardized definition exists and the clinical relevance has not been studied in detail yet.

METHODS

143 patients with DILI enrolled in a prospective study were analyzed. DILI diagnosis was based on the monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like cell test and supported by Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) and expert adjudication. Testing for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) was performed using immunofluorescence. ANA titers ≥1:100 were considered positive and ≥1:400 clinically relevant; AMA positivity was considered at titers ≥1:100.

RESULTS

67% exhibited ANA ≥1:100 and 29% ANA ≥1:400; 10% were AMA positive. There was no significant correlation between the ANA titers and the causative drug, while AMA positive patients had taken nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs more frequently. No difference was seen regarding clinical characteristics or laboratory parameters in patients with ANA ≥1:400, while patients with positive AMA presented with higher aminotransferases, bilirubin, and international normalized ratio. Significantly higher proportions of patients with ANA ≥1:400 or AMA positivity exhibited elevated immunoglobulin G levels. AMA positivity but not elevated ANA titers correlated with a higher proportion of Hy's law positivity.

CONCLUSION

A closer look in a causality proven DILI cohort provided no evidence that presence of ANA titers is specific for DILI by a certain medication. AMA rather than ANA positivity was related to a more pronounced liver injury.

Signatures in drug-induced liver injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can be induced by a myriad of drugs. Assessing whether the patient has DILI and assessing which drug is the most likely culprit are challenging. There has been too little attention paid to the concept that certain drugs appear to have unique clinical features or 'phenotypes'.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several case series of DILI because of various drugs have been published, and analysis of these case series points to the fact that individual drugs have characteristic DILI signatures. These clinical phenotypes can be characterized by latency, biochemical features (R-value), as well as clinical symptoms and signs. Several drugs, including isoniazid, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, anabolic steroids, β-interferon and others, have highly unique clinical features. Such unique properties may be able to be used to improve adjudication processes.

SUMMARY

Individual drugs have unique clinical DILI phenotypes or signatures. Furthermore, these may be able to be used to improve adjudication.

Literature Review of Traditional Chinese Medicine Herbs-Induced Liver Injury From an Oncological Perspective With RUCAM

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) herbs are commonly regarded to be safe with minimal toxicities in Chinese communities. Cancer patients who are receiving Western oncology therapy often concurrently take TCM herbs for anticancer and symptom relief purposes. We performed a literature review for current evidence on TCM herb–induced liver injury from an oncological perspective. A literature search on PubMed was performed to identify publications regarding TCM herbs and concoctions with hepatoprotective or hepatotoxic properties. Lists of commonly used herbs and their causality levels were compiled. In view of the wide range of evidence available, cases assessed by the well-established RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) algorithm were categorized as the highest level of evidence. More than one case of TCM herb–induced liver injury was confirmed by RUCAM in the following herbs and concoctions: Lu Cha (Camellia sinensis), Bai Xian Pi (Dictamnus dasycarpus), Tu San Qi (Gynura segetum), Jin Bu Huan (Lycopodium serratum), He Shou Wu (Polygoni multiflora), Ge Gen (Pueraria lobata), Dan Lu Tong Du tablet, Shou Wu Pian, Xiao Chai Hu Tang, Xiao Yin pill, and Yang Xue Sheng Fa capsule. Finally, TCM with anticancer or symptom relief uses were discussed in detail with regard to their hepatotoxic or hepatoprotective properties.

Drug-Drug Combinations Can Enhance Toxicity as Shown by Monocyte-Derived Hepatocyte-like Cells From Patients With Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Study identifier

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 02353455.

Acute hepatitis and acute liver failure: Pathologic diagnosis and differential diagnosis

Acute hepatitis and acute liver failure are severe medical conditions that require early clinical intervention. Histopathologic findings on a liver biopsy or a liver explant may help identify the underlying etiology or provide an important direction for further clinical, laboratory and radiographical investigation. This review is divided into two main portions. The first portion concentrates on various etiologies and discusses unique histologic features that can be associated with specific etiologies. The second portion describes the general morphologic features based on which the diagnosis of acute hepatitis and acute liver failure are made. Histopathologic distinction between collapse and cirrhosis and limitations of histopathologic assessment for underlying etiologies are addressed in this portion. Another focus of this review is non-necrotic acute liver failure, which typically features diffuse microvesicular steatosis secondary to various etiologies causing mitochondrial dysfunction. Molecular testing serves an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and management of this group of disorders.