Swallowing after laryngectomy

Swallow-related Brain Activity in Post-total Laryngectomy Patients: A Case Series Study

Background

Total laryngectomy is a surgical procedure to completely remove the hyoid bone, larynx, and associated muscles as a curative treatment for laryngeal cancer. This leads to insufficient swallowing function with compensative movements of the residual tongue to propel the food bolus to the pharynx and esophagus. However, the neurophysiological mechanisms of compensative swallowing after total laryngectomy remain unclear. Recently, swallowing-related cortical activation such as event-related desynchronization (ERD) during swallowing has been reported in healthy participants and neurological patients with dysphagia. Abnormal ERD elucidates the pathophysiological cortical activities that are related to swallowing. No report has investigated ERD in post-total laryngectomy patients.

Case

We investigated ERD during volitional swallowing using electroencephalography in three male patients after total laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer (age and time after surgery: Case 1, 75 years, 10 years; Case 2, 85 years, 19 years; Case 3, 73 years, 19 years). In video fluorographic swallowing studies, we observed compensatory tongue movements such as posterior-inferior retraction of the tongue and contact on the posterior pharyngeal wall in all three cases. Significant ERD was localized in the bilateral medial sensorimotor areas and the left lateral parietal area in Case 1, in the bilateral frontal and left temporal areas in Case 2, and in the left prefrontal and premotor areas in Case 3.

Discussion

These results suggest that cortical activities related to swallowing might reflect cortical reorganization for modified swallowing movements of residual tongue muscles to compensate for reduced swallowing pressure in patients after total laryngectomy.

Toward a robust swallowing detection for an implantable active artificial larynx: a survey

Total laryngectomy consists in the removal of the larynx and is intended as a curative treatment for laryngeal cancer, but it leaves the patient with no possibility to breathe, talk, and swallow normally anymore. A tracheostomy is created to restore breathing through the throat, but the aero-digestive tracts are permanently separated and the air no longer passes through the nasal tracts, which allowed filtration, warming, humidification, olfaction, and acceleration of the air for better tissue oxygenation. As for phonation restoration, various techniques allow the patient to talk again. The main one consists of a tracheo-esophageal valve prosthesis that makes the air passes from the esophagus to the pharynx, and makes the air vibrate to allow speech through articulation. Finally, swallowing is possible through the original tract as it is now isolated from the trachea. Yet, many methods exist to detect and assess a swallowing, but none is intended as a definitive restoration technique of the natural airway, which would permanently close the tracheostomy and avoid its adverse effects. In addition, these methods are non-invasive and lack detection accuracy. The feasibility of an effective early detection of swallowing would allow to further develop an implantable active artificial larynx and therefore restore the aero-digestive tracts. A previous attempt has been made on an artificial larynx implanted in 2012, but no active detection was included and the system was completely mechanic. This led to residues in the airway because of the imperfect sealing of the mechanism. An active swallowing detection coupled with indwelling measurements would thus likely add a significant reliability on such a system as it would allow to actively close an artificial larynx. So, after a brief explanation of the swallowing mechanism, this survey intends to first provide a detailed consideration of the anatomical region involved in swallowing, with a detection perspective. Second, the swallowing mechanism following total laryngectomy surgery is detailed. Third, the current non-invasive swallowing detection technique and their limitations are discussed. Finally, the previous points are explored with regard to the inherent requirements for the feasibility of an effective swallowing detection for an artificial larynx. Graphical Abstract.

Conformity between modified Swallowing Outcome After Laryngectomy questionnaire and Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in laryngeal carcinoma patients after total laryngectomy

BACKGROUND

One of the impacts in anatomic laryngeal and phariyngeal changes after total laryngectomy (TL) is oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD). The detection of neopharyngeal residue as a sign of OPD can be performed by videofluoroscopy (VFS) and flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). The availability of these tools in rural areas is still limited, thus the treatment of OPD is not maximal. There is a need for a more practical tool, including the modified swallowing outcomes after laryngectomy (SOAL) questionnaire.

METHODS

This was an analytic observational diagnostic study with a cross-sectional approach. Samples were obtained in Otorhinolaryngology Oncology Clinic and Outpatient Clinic of Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia, who filled SOAL modified questionnaire followed by FEES. Samples were obtained within 3 months from 10 May to 10 August 2021. The number of samples obtained through simple random sampling was 16 post-TL patients from a total population of 17 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The conformity test between modified SOAL questionnaire and FEES was analyzed using McNemar comparison test and Kappa association test.

RESULTS

McNemar test showed no significant difference between both assessment tools (p > 0.05), and the Kappa test showed an association between both tools (p < 0.05). The results of this study stated that there was conformity between modified SOAL questionnaire and FEES in patients after TL in all types of food bolus had Kappa score of >0.81, showing a reliable association between these tools. Kappa test also showed that out of all three types of boluses, the soft bolus had the highest conformity with a Kappa score of 0.875, followed by thick bolus with 0.839, and watery bolus with 0.818.

CONCLUSION

There was a conformity between the results of the modified SOAL questionnaire and FEES in head and neck surgery patients after TL.

Short and Long-Term Voice and Swallowing-Related Quality of Life in Patients Who Underwent Total Laryngectomy and Tracheoesophageal Puncture

Background

Voice and swallowing disorders can create a profound psychosocial impact on the patient’s quality of life. The focus of this study is to assess the psychosocial disabling effects on patients after total laryngectomy (TLP) using pre-validated surveys called the Voice Handicap Index 10 (VHI) for voice disorders and the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) for swallowing disorders.

Methodology

This is a retrospective cohort study that was done on a total of 21 patients. The study was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital between 2017 and 2022. The Cronbach’s alpha value was used to evaluate internal consistency reliability. The relationship between DHI, VHI, and demographic and clinical variables was analyzed by correlation analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant, and all the tests were two-sided.

Results

The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient satisfied the internal consistency reliability for VHI and DHI for both total and their subscale scores. For DHI, the total score and emotional subscale obtained an alpha of greater than 0.9, indicating excellent internal consistency, whereas both physical and functional alpha scores indicated good internal consistency (α = 0.888 and α = 0.863, respectively). For VHI, the total score and physical subscale of the VHI had excellent internal consistency (α = 0.957 and α = 0.937, respectively), while the functional and emotional subscales had good internal consistency (α = 0.865 and α = 0.894, respectively). The total DHI scores, as well as the functional subscale scores, were significant (p = 0.033, p = 0.025, respectively) in terms of self-reported dysphagia severity. A moderately severe group (69.00 ± 19.17) had higher mean total scores, whereas severe individuals had higher subscale mean scores according to self-reported dysphagia severity. Self-reported dysphagia severity was as follows: normal (n = 3, 14.3%), mild (n = 4, 19%), moderate (n = 8, 38.1%), and severe (n = 6, 28.6%).

Conclusions

The disability caused by voice and swallowing disorders can be evaluated by VHI and DHI which have been statistically validated as reliable tools to assess the effects of dysphagia and dysphonia on quality of life. Patients after laryngectomy have higher mean DHI and VHI overall and functional subscale scores. However, this study failed to establish any relationship between clinical and demographical characteristics of the patients with DHI and VHI index.  

Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in Patients Treated by Total Laryngectomy and Adjuvant Treatment for Advanced Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Malignancies

Treatment of locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers often requires total laryngectomy with partial pharyngectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. Dysphagia is common after such aggressive treatment which is often under reported, but adversely affects the quality of life in these patients. The cause for this dysphagia is loss of pharyngeal mucosa, fibrosis, disruption of constrictors and loss of skeletal support to soft tissues. In this study 32 patients treated by laryngectomy with partial pharyngectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy underwent fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing at 6 and 12 weeks after completion of treatment. Majority of them had delayed transit of bolus, dryness and edema and 6 of them had pharyngeal stenosis, 2 had fibrotic band and 2 had adynamic pharyngeal segments. These findings were the cause of dysphagia. The frequency of occurrence of the above findings and their association with extent of resection of pharyngeal mucosa and adjuvant treatment have been documented. Bilateral neck dissection, post operative chemotherapy with radiotherapy and use of myocutaneous flap for the reconstruction of neopharynx were found to cause severe dysphagia in our series. Some of these patients benefitted by swallowing therapy, diet modifications and nasogastric feeding. Therefore early identification of cause of dysphagia in these patients and timely intervention to facilitate rehabilitation can improve the quality of life and reduce the long term morbidity in these patients.

Association of Functional Outcomes in Tracheoesophageal Voicing With Intratracheal Pressures and Esophagram Findings

Importance

Tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis (TEP) is a commonly used device for alaryngeal voicing following total laryngectomy. Variability in TEP voice and speech production may be reflected in differences in intratracheal pressures.

Objective

To examine the association between intratracheal manometric pressure (IMP), speech function, and proximal esophageal abnormalities in patients with TEP.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single academic institution and included all patients with a history of total laryngectomy and TEP who completed a radiographic esophagram and intratracheal manometry between September 9, 2019, and December 4, 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Intratracheal manometric pressures during sustained phonation, conversational speech, and maximum loudness tasks were obtained for 22 patients. Pressure metrics, phonation duration time, and fluency of speech production were compared between patients with dysphagia with those without swallowing complaints. The association between pressure and speech metrics was also assessed.

Results

Of 22 patients, 17 (77.2%) were men, 5 (22.7%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 66.6 (8.8) years. The mean (SD) sustained phonation duration time was 9.3 (5.2) seconds, and the mean (SD) IMP during sustained phonation was 50.5 (21.4) cm H20. The IMPs during sustained phonation were strongly correlated with conversational speech (r = 0.712; 95% CI, 0.384-1.039) and moderately correlated with maximum loudness tasks (r = 0.524; 95% CI, 0.127-0.921). The IMPs during conversational speech were moderately correlated with maximum loudness task (r = 0.538; 95% CI, 0.145-0.931). Increased IMP during sustained phonation was moderately correlated with decreased sustained phonation duration time (r = -0.450; 95% CI, -0.867 to -0.034) and conversational speech was moderately correlated with decreased sustained phonation duration time (r = -0.524; 95% CI, -0.921 to -0.127). Patients with subjective swallowing complaints and proximal esophagus abnormalities had a shorter maximum phonation time (mean [SD], 7.08 [5.03] seconds) compared with patients without subjective dysphagic complaints (mean [SD], 11.95 [4.40] seconds), with a large effect size (Cohen d = 1.031; 95% CI, 0.141-1.92). All patients with nonfluent TEP speech production had structural abnormalities of the proximal esophagus. No difference in pressure or speech metrics was observed for primary closure vs reconstructive flap type.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study found that increased IMP and abnormalities of the proximal esophagus were associated with worse TEP speech quality. Evaluation of the esophagus should be considered in patients who are experiencing difficulties with TEP voicing. Further investigation of intratracheal manometry as a biofeedback tool to improve TEP voicing is needed.

Biomechanics of the tongue during swallowing after total laryngectomy: an integrative review

PURPOSE

To synthesize the state of scientific knowledge about biomechanics of the tongue during swallowing after total laryngectomy.

RESEARCH STRATEGY

The PICO question and combinations of descriptors and single terms were formulated in the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, LILACS, and SciELO databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Articles in Portuguese, English, or Spanish were included, without time limit, with results on the biomechanics of the tongue during swallowing and total laryngectomy, and studies on randomized or non-randomized clinical trials, cohort, case control, cross-sectional, case series, and case studies.

DATA ANALYSIS

year, country, population, objective, study design, assessment methods, main outcomes, and methodological quality were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were four studies in the United States, one in Australia, and one in Brazil, all published between 1986 and 2014. In all studies, the biomechanics of the tongue was the secondary outcome. Most articles had low methodological quality, small samples, predominance of the male gender, and a prevalent cross-sectional design. The assessment instruments were fluoroscopy, manometry, accelerometer or a device to capture tongue pressure. Main results indicated a higher propulsion force of the tongue base to overcome the high resistance of the neopharynx to the bolus flow, reduced contact and pressure between the base of the tongue and the posterior pharyngeal wall, residues in the tongue base after swallowing, increased pressure, and reduced resistance of the oral tongue.

CONCLUSION

There are indications of compensatory tongue movements during swallowing after total laryngectomy; however, the scientific evidence is insufficient.

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Swallow Outcomes After Laryngectomy (SOAL) Questionnaire for Brazilian Portuguese

PURPOSE

To adapt the Swallow Outcomes After Laryngectomy (SOAL) Questionnaire for the Brazilian culture.

METHOD

Validation study restricted to translation and cross-cultural adaptation. The following steps were taken: discussion of the need for the instrument in the Brazilian context, two independent translations, summary of the translations, analysis by a committee of 12 expert judges in dysphagia and oncology, analysis of the judges' comments and of the content validity indexes of each item and of the questionnaire as a whole, application of the questionnaire in a sample of 10 total laryngectomy patients, back translation and final summary.

RESULTS

It was necessary to perform semantic, syntactic/grammatical, experiential, idiomatic and content equivalences, mainly after the analysis by experts. The content validity indexes of each item and of the questionnaire were acceptable for all evaluated aspects. The back translation was equivalent to the original version. The comparison of the original, translated and back-translated versions indicated that the final version of the instrument was viable.

CONCLUSION

The SOAL was adapted to the Brazilian culture was developed. The validation process will continue using the version presented in this study.

Results of pretreatment swallowing evaluation in patients with stage III/IV laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma are among the common head and neck cancers causing considerable swallowing dysfunction. The functional status of the organ (larynx) is an important point of contention while considering the patients for organ preservation protocol.

METHODOLOGY

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the swallowing status in stage III/IV laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma and its influence on treatment decision. We evaluated all treatment naïve patients who were referred to the swallowing clinic in 2017 (Jan-Dec) for assessment of swallowing prior to treatment initiation.

RESULTS

One hundred patients satisfied the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. The site and stage of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer cases were almost equal in number. Their median age was 58 years. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was done in all patients. 30% of the patients only had swallowing difficulties. Only advanced T-stage (p = 0.04) had an influence on the pretreatment swallowing status. Thirty-seven patients required nasogastric tube (NGT) for feeding. By 2 month post-treatment completion, most patients on NGT could resume oral feeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment swallowing assessment alone did not significantly seem to influence our decisions for organ preservation treatment. However, patients with aspiration could be identified and managed appropriately. Most patients on NGT could resume oral feeds post-treatment completion.

CO2 Laser Division of Neo-Vallecula Improves Dysphagia in the Postlaryngectomy Patient: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Objectives

To review the literature on neo-vallecula diagnosis and management and to report our findings regarding 3 patients who developed neo-vallecula in the context of free-flap pharyngeal reconstruction following total laryngectomy.

Methods

This case series reports three patients who developed a neo-vallecula following a laryngectomy and free-flap pharyngeal reconstruction. All three patients were treated with a CO₂ laser endoscopic procedure.

Results

Neo-vallecula formation is thought to be related to tension on the neopharyngeal closure or closure technique following total laryngectomy. Diagnosis may be obtained with swallow studies, videofluoroscopy, or endoscopy. Treatment has included external excision and endoscopic procedures such as stapling, harmonic scalpel excision, and laser removal. We utilized an endoscopic approach entailing the use of a CO₂ laser to divide the neo-vallecula, and all our patients reported improvement in their dysphagia.

Conclusions

Treatment of an anterior neo-vallecula endoscopically using a CO₂ laser is an effective way to treat dysphagia in patients following total laryngectomy with free-flap pharyngeal reconstruction.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Dysphagia

This review summarizes the relevant literature for the initial imaging of patients with symptoms of dysphagia. For patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia who have an underlying attributable cause, a modified barium swallow is usually appropriate for initial imaging but for those who have unexplained dysphagia a fluoroscopic biphasic esophagram is usually appropriate. Fluoroscopic biphasic esophagram is usually appropriate for initial imaging in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients who have retrosternal dysphagia. For postoperative patients with dysphagia, fluoroscopic single-contrast esophagram and CT neck and chest with intravenous (IV) contrast are usually appropriate for oropharyngeal or retrosternal dysphagia occurring in the early postoperative period where water-soluble contrast is usually preferred rather than barium sulfate. In the later postoperative period (greater than 1 month), CT neck and chest with IV contrast and fluoroscopic single-contrast esophagram are usually appropriate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Factors affecting swallowing outcomes after total laryngectomy: Participant self-report using the swallowing outcomes after laryngectomy questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Little is known about what factors affect patient-reported swallowing outcome after total laryngectomy. We explored whether patient demographics, surgical variables, use of adjuvant treatment, and time since surgery were associated with patient-reported swallowing outcome.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of laryngectomees in eight UK hospitals. Demographic, treatment, and surgical variables were drawn from medical notes. The swallowing outcomes after laryngectomy (SOAL) questionnaire captured perceived swallowing outcome.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty one participants had complete data on treatment-related variables. In regression analysis, having a free jejunum flap repair and requiring chemoradiation were the only two variables that added significantly to the model of worse self-reported swallowing outcome (R² adjusted = .23, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The SOAL is a sensitive measure of self-reported swallowing outcome after laryngectomy. Type of surgical closure and the type of additional treatment influenced the swallowing outcome reported by patients. Changes in perceived swallowing function need to be routinely evaluated to inform clinical decision-making and intervention.

Diagnosis and treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia after total laryngectomy with or without pharyngoesophageal reconstruction: Systematic review

Background

This systematic review qualitatively summarizes the current literature on diagnosis and treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) after total laryngectomy (TLE).

Methods

Electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were used. Two independent reviewers carried out the literature search and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using a critical appraisal tool.

Results

Forty‐four articles met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 35 studies were on diagnosis, four on therapy, and five on both diagnosis and treatment of OD following TLE. Study aims, swallowing‐assessment methods, and main findings of the included studies were summarized and presented.

Conclusions

The reviewers found heterogeneous outcomes and serious methodological limitations, which prevented us from pooling data to identify trends that would assist in designing best clinical practice protocols for OD following TLE. Further research should focus on several remaining gaps in our knowledge on diagnosis and treatment interventions for OD following TLE.

Horizontal (vs. vertical) closure of the neo-pharynx is associated with superior postoperative swallowing after total laryngectomy

We conducted a cross-sectional study to compare the horizontal and vertical methods used in the surgical closure of the neo-pharynx after total laryngectomy in terms of their effect on swallowing function, swallowing-related quality of life (QOL), and overall QOL. We also assessed the potential influence of age (≤64 vs. ≥65 yr) and the type of treatment modality (primary, salvage, or total laryngectomy with radiotherapy) on outcomes. Our final study population was made up of 34 patients-31 men and 3 women, aged 49 to 89 years (mean: 66.8)-who had undergone a total laryngectomy. One year after surgery, all patients were asked to complete the M.D. Anderson dysphagia inventory (MDADI), which quantifies swallowing function and swallowing-related QOL, and the University of Washington quality-of-life questionnaire (UW-QOL), which quantifies overall QOL. Of the 34 patients, 16 had undergone a horizontal surgical closure of their neo-pharynx and 18 a vertical closure. According to the MDADI, patients in the horizontal group experienced significantly better swallowing function/QOL; the mean composite MDADI scores were 91.5 in the horizontal group and 68.3 in the vertical group (p = 0.005). We found no significant difference in terms of overall QOL, as the respective mean UW-QOL scores were 81.0 and 80.8 (p = 0.93). The population correlation coefficient was positive in both groups, but more so in the horizontal group (ρ_horizontal = 0.876 and ρ_vertical = 0.676). Neither age nor the type of treatment modality employed influenced swallowing function/QOL (p_age = 0.10, p_{treatment modality} = 0.78) or overall QOL (p_age = 0.08, p_{treatment modality} = 0.59). We conclude that horizontal closure of the neo-pharynx is superior to vertical closure in terms postoperative swallowing function/QOL but not overall QOL.

Voice and swallowing after total laryngectomy

BACKGROUND

Voice and swallowing problems are often seen in patients with advanced larynx cancer, after total laryngectomy (TL) and chemo/radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of voice and swallowing problems in patients who have been laryngectomised and investigate if these symptoms were related to age, time after TL, radiotherapy and TNM-classification. In addition, we studied how often the patients changed their voice prostheses and the need of therapeutic interventions after TL.

METHODS

Forty-five patients were included in the study and completed the Swedish version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire and the Voice Handicap Index-T.

RESULTS

Swallowing problems were reported by 89% of the patients and moderate-to-severe voice handicap was reported by 66%. Most of the subjects who had dysphagia also presented voice problems (r_s = 0.67 p ≤ .01). Additional therapeutic interventions to manage problems with voice and/or swallowing after TL were required in 62% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Swallowing and voice problems after TL are common. Thus, the preoperative information and assessment of these functions, as well as the treatment and the post-operative rehabilitation should be evaluated and optimised to provide better functional results after treatment of advanced larynx cancer.

Evidence and evidence gaps of laryngeal cancer surgery

Surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer has been established for decades. In addition to total laryngectomy, which was first performed in 1873, a large number or organ preservation surgical techniques, like open partial laryngectomy, transoral laser microsurgery, and transoral robotic surgery have been developed. Studies on laryngeal cancer surgery are mainly retrospective case series and cohort studies. The evolution of chemoradiation protocols and their analysis in prospective randomized trials have led to an increasing acceptance of non-surgical treatment procedures. In addition to an improvement of prognosis, in recent years the preservation of function and maintenance of life quality after primary therapy of laryngeal cancer has increasingly become the focus of therapy planning. Significant late toxicity after chemoradiation has been identified as an important issue. This leads to a reassessment of surgical concepts and initiation of studies on laryngeal cancer surgery which was additionally stimulated by the advent of transoral robotic surgery in the US. Improving the evidence base of laryngeal cancer surgery by successful establishment of surgical trials should be the future goal.