Current management of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome

[The six most frequent peripheral vestibular syndromes]

Three forms of peripheral vestibular disorders, each with its typical symptoms and clinical signs, can be differentiated functionally, anatomically and pathophysiologically: 1. inadequate unilateral paroxysmal stimulation or rarely inhibition of the peripheral vestibular system, e. g., BPPV, Menière's disease, vestibular paroxysmia or syndrome of the third mobile windows; 2. acute unilateral vestibulopathy leading to an acute vestibular tone imbalance manifesting as an acute peripheral vestibular syndrome; and 3. loss or impairment of function of the vestibular nerve and/or labyrinth: bilateral vestibulopathy. For all of these diseases, current diagnostic criteria by the Bárány-Society are available with a high clinical and scientific impact, also for clinical trials. The treatment depends on the underlying disease. It basically consists of 5 principles: 1. Explaining the symptoms and signs, pathophysiology, aetiology and treatment options to the patient; this is important for compliance, adherence and persistence. 2. Physical therapy: A) For BPPV specific liberatory maneuvers, depending on canal involved. Posterior canal: The new SémontPLUS maneuver is superior to the regular Sémont and Epley maneuvers; horizontal canal: the modified roll-maneuver; anterior canal the modified Yacovino-maneuver; 3. Symptomatic or causative drug therapy. There is still a deficit of placebo-controlled clinical trials so that the level of evidence for pharmacotherapy is most often low. 4. Surgery, mainly for the syndrome of the third mobile windows. 5. Psychotherapeutic measures for secondary functional dizziness.

Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) repair through the middle cranial fossa approach is typically performed on a patient in the supine position and the patient’s head is turned to the contralateral side and secured with surgical pinions or supported on a headrest. However, traditional supine positioning method may place strain on the patient’s neck, limit the surgeon’s visualization of the dehiscence due to inadequate head rotation, and compromise the ergonomic positioning of the surgeon. Here, we present a novel positioning method for middle fossa SCD repair that allows for optimal head rotation in a semi-supine position, requires less set-up and patient manipulation than the park bench position, and does not require the use of surgical pins.

Evaluation of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Anatomical Location and Clinical Outcomes: A Single Institution's Experience

BACKGROUND

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is becoming increasingly recognized as a pathology underlying various auditory and vestibular complaints. To date, our understanding of the pathology has yet to attribute specific symptoms to the anatomic location of dehiscence in patients with SSCD. This study aims to address this issue by evaluating the relationship between symptomatology and anatomic location of dehiscence.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review of SSCD patients was performed. Information was collected on patient demographics, symptomatology, and anatomic location of dehiscence. High-resolution computed tomography scans of the temporal bones were used to categorize the anatomic SSCD location into 1 of 3 groups: anterior limb, apex, and posterior limb. Lastly, we performed statistical analysis to determine the degree of association between each of the various perioperative factors and anatomic SSCD location.

RESULTS

We studied 54 patients in total (32 women, 22 men). Mean age at diagnosis was 53 years (range: 20-82 years) and mean follow-up length was 5.5 months (range: 0.03-27.0 months). The most common anatomical location of superior semicircular canal dehiscence was the apex, which was seen in 68.5% of cases. While preoperative symptomatology was similar among the 3 cohorts, those with apical dehiscences had a significantly higher rate of postoperative improvement of autophony (P = 0.03), aural fullness (P = 0.03), and tinnitus (P = 0.05) as compared to their counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our results do not support an association between preoperative characteristics-including symptomatology-and anatomic SSCD location, our findings do suggest that apical dehiscences are associated with greater postoperative symptomatic resolution.

Relationship Between Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Volume with Clinical Symptoms: Case Series

BACKGROUND

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is an osseous defect of the arcuate eminence of the petrosal temporal bone. Patients typically present with auditory and vestibular symptoms, such as hearing loss and disequilibrium. Using advanced imaging segmentation techniques, we evaluated whether the volume of SSCD correlated with preoperative symptoms and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Our laboratory previously described a novel method of quantifying the size of an SSCD via manual segmentation. High-resolution computed tomography images of the temporal bones were imported into a specialized segmentation software. The volume of the dehiscence was outlined on consecutive slices of the coronal and axial planes via a single-pixel-thick paintbrush tool and was then calculated according to the number of nonzero image voxels.

RESULTS

This study included 111 patients (70 women and 41 men; mean age, 55.1 years; age range, 24-87 years) with a total of 164 SSCDs. Mean postoperative follow-up time was 5.2 months (range, 0.03-59.5 months). The most common preoperative and postoperative symptoms were tinnitus (n = 85) and dizziness (n = 45), respectively. Surgery resulted in improvement of symptoms in most patients. The average volume of 164 SSCDs was 1.3 mm³. SSCD volume was not significantly associated with either preoperative symptoms or postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in imaging techniques have allowed increased visualization of SSCD. Further research will be necessary to evaluate the potential correlation of volume of the dehiscence with clinical variables.

[Less common, but clinically important episodic vertigo syndromes]

Die Differentialdiagnostik der selteneren, episodischen Schwindelsyndrome kann im klinischen Alltag eine Herausforderung darstellen, insbesondere wenn sie keine im Intervall messbaren Befunde in der neuro-ophthalmologischen oder -otologischen Routinediagnostik hinterlassen. Ursächlich für diese episodischen Schwindelsyndrome können physiologische Reaktionen aufgrund intersensorischer Inkongruenzen oder angeborene bzw. erworbene neuroanatomische/neurophysiologische Varianten sein, die zu vestibulären Reizsyndromen führen. In dieser Übersicht fokussieren wir auf die folgenden, aus unserer Sicht wichtigen vestibulären Syndrome: Bewegungskrankheit, Mal de Debarquement Syndrom, Visuelle Höhenintoleranz, Vestibularisparoxysmie, Zervikaler Schwindel, Episodische Ataxie Typ II und Syndrome eines dritten mobilen Fensters wie das Syndrom der Dehiszenz des superioren Bogengangs. Die Ausprägung reicht von milden Symptomen mit geringer Belastung bis hin zu schweren Krankheitsbildern mit relevanter Alltagseinschränkung. Sie können vom Kindes- oder Jugendalter bis ins Senium auftreten, teilweise mit abweichender Symptomatik. Durch gezielte Anamnese und ggf. erweiterte vestibuläre Diagnostik in einem spezialisierten Zentrum lassen sich diese Syndrome oft klar herausarbeiten und einer erfolgreichen Therapie zuführen.