Less invasive surfactant administration: best practices and unanswered questions

Influence of catheter thickness on respiratory physiology during less invasive surfactant administration in extremely preterm infants

Introduction

Delivering surfactant via thin catheters (minimal-invasive surfactant therapy (MIST); less invasive surfactant administration (LISA)) has become a common procedure. However, the effect of tracheal obstruction caused by catheters of different sizes on tracheal resistance in extremely low gestational age newborns (ELGANs) is unknown.

Methods

To investigate the effect of catheters size 3.5, 5 and 6 French on airway resistance in ELGANs of 23-28 weeks gestational age during LISA, we performed calculations based on Hagen-Poiseuille's law and compared these with a clinically and physically more accurate method: computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of respiratory airflow, performed in 3D virtual airway models derived from MRI.

Results

The presence of the above catheters decreased the cross-sectional area of the infants' tracheal entrance (the cricoid ring) by 13-53%. Hagen-Poiseuille's law predicted an increase in resistance by 1.5-4.5 times and 1.3-2.6 times in ELGANs born at 23 and 28 weeks, respectively. However, CFD simulations demonstrated an even higher increase in resistance of 3.4-85.1 and 1.1-3.5 times, respectively. The higher calculated resistances were due to the extremely narrow remaining lumen at the glottis and cricoid with the catheter inserted, resulting in a stronger glottal jet and turbulent airflow, which was not predicted by Hagen-Poiseuille.

Conclusion

Catheter thickness can greatly increase tracheal resistance during LISA-procedures in ELGANs. Based on these models, it is recommended to use the thinnest catheter possible during LISA in ELGANs to avoid unnecessary increases in airway resistance in infants already experiencing dyspnea due to respiratory distress syndrome.

NON-pharmacological Approach Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (NONA-LISA) trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Using pre-procedure analgesia with the risk of apnoea may complicate the Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) procedure or reduce the effect of LISA.

METHODS

The NONA-LISA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05609877) is a multicentre, blinded, randomised controlled trial aiming at including 324 infants born before 30 gestational weeks, meeting the criteria for surfactant treatment by LISA. Infants will be randomised to LISA after administration of fentanyl 0.5-1 mcg/kg intravenously (fentanyl group) or isotonic saline solution intravenously (saline group). All infants will receive standardised non-pharmacological comfort care before and during the LISA procedure. Additional analgesics will be provided at the clinician's discretion. The primary outcome is the need for invasive ventilation, meaning mechanical or manual ventilation via an endotracheal tube, for at least 30 min (cumulated) within 24 h of the procedure. Secondary outcomes include the modified COMFORTneo score during the procedure, bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks, and mortality at 36 weeks.

DISCUSSION

The NONA-LISA trial has the potential to provide evidence for a standardised approach to relief from discomfort in preterm infants during LISA and to reduce invasive ventilation. The results may affect future clinical practice.

IMPACT

Pre-procedure analgesia is associated with apnoea and may complicate procedures that rely on regular spontaneous breathing, such as Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA). This randomised controlled trial addresses the effect of analgesic premedication in LISA by comparing fentanyl with a placebo (isotonic saline) in infants undergoing the LISA procedure. All infants will receive standardised non-pharmacological comfort. The NONA-LISA trial has the potential to provide evidence for a standardised approach to relief from discomfort or pain in preterm infants during LISA and to reduce invasive ventilation. The results may affect future clinical practice regarding analgesic treatment associated with the LISA procedure.

Beyond Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Comprehensive Review of Chronic Lung Diseases in Neonates

In neonates, pulmonary diseases such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia and other chronic lung diseases (CLDs) pose significant challenges due to their complexity and high degree of morbidity and mortality. This review discusses the etiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic criteria for these conditions, as well as current management strategies. The review also highlights recent advancements in understanding the pathophysiology of these diseases and evolving strategies for their management, including gene therapy and stem cell treatments. We emphasize how supportive care is useful in managing these diseases and underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. Notably, we discuss the emerging role of personalized medicine, enabled by advances in genomics and precision therapeutics, in tailoring therapy according to an individual's genetic, biochemical, and lifestyle factors. We conclude with a discussion on future directions in research and treatment, emphasizing the importance of furthering our understanding of these conditions, improving diagnostic criteria, and exploring targeted treatment modalities. The review underscores the need for multicentric and longitudinal studies to improve preventative strategies and better understand long-term outcomes. Ultimately, a comprehensive, innovative, and patient-centered approach can enhance the quality of care and outcomes for neonates with CLDs.

Respiratory Severity Score and Oxygen Saturation Index during the First 2 Hours of Life as Predictors for Noninvasive Respiratory Support Failure in Respiratory Distress Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

 Noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) failure is common in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). We evaluated the utility of respiratory severity score (RSS) and oxygen saturation index (OSI) during the first 2 hours of life (HOL) as predictors for NRS failure in moderate preterm infants.

STUDY DESIGN

 We conducted a retrospective cohort study of infants born between 280/7 and 336/7 weeks with RDS. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess whether the RSS and OSI summary measures were associated with NRS failure.

RESULTS

 A total of 282 infants were included in the study. Median gestational age and birth weights were 32 weeks and 1.7 kg, respectively. Fifty-eight infants (21%) developed NRS failure at the median age of 10.5 hours. RSS and OSI summary measures in the first 2 HOL were associated with NRS failure within 72 HOL.

CONCLUSION

 RSS and OSI during the first 2 HOL can predict NRS failure. Optimal RSS and OSI cutoffs for the prediction of NRS failure need to be determined in large cohort studies.

KEY POINTS

· Nearly one in five moderate preterm infants on NRS at 2 hours of life developed NRS failure.. · RSS and OSI during the first 2 HOL can predict NRS failure.. · Optimal RSS and OSI cutoffs for the prediction of NRS failure need to be determined..

Complications of Preterm Birth-The Importance of Care for the Outcome: A Narrative Review

Preterm-born children are susceptible to problems of adaptation in the early neonatal period, as well as the emergence of consequences due to the immaturity of the respiratory, cardiovascular, and especially cerebrovascular systems. The authors searched PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for articles that were available in their entirety and published in English between 1990 and 2024 in peer-reviewed journals using keywords relevant to the manuscript topic. Analyzing the requested studies and manuscripts, adequate articles describing the stated problem were used. The last trimester of pregnancy is the most important period in brain development. Brain growth is at its most intense, and nerve cells are created, multiply, and migrate, creating numerous connections between them and receptors. During this period, the baby is protected from the influence of external environmental factors. When a baby is born, it leaves its protected environment and very often requires intensive treatment to survive. In these circumstances, the immature nervous system, which is in a sensitive stage of development, is overloaded with numerous external stimuli, continuous light, noise, inappropriate positioning, and repeated painful reactions due to necessary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and the unavoidable absence of the mother and the family, which cause stress that threatens proper programmed development. Minimally invasive therapeutic procedures and the presence of parents during hospitalization play a significant role in reducing the consequences for a premature child.

Respiratory Severity Score during the First 3 Hours of Life as a Predictor for Failure of Noninvasive Respiratory Support and Need for Late Rescue Surfactant Administration

OBJECTIVE

Preterm infants often develop failure of noninvasive respiratory support. These infants miss the advantages of early rescue surfactant therapy. In this study, we evaluate the utility of respiratory severity score (RSS) during the first 3 hours of life (HOL) as a predictor for failure of noninvasive respiratory support.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a post hoc analysis of infants between 23 and 40 weeks' gestational age who received usual care in the AERO-02 clinical trial. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to assess whether the RSS summary measures were associated with the odds of surfactant administration.

RESULTS

Study involved 146 infants. Sixty-four infants (45%) received surfactant within the first 72 hours. Administration of surfactant was associated with the mean RSS (p < 0.01) and the linear trend (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that RSS during the first 3 HOL can predict failure of noninvasive respiratory support and need for late rescue surfactant administration. Optimal RSS cutoffs for early rescue surfactant therapy need to be determined in large cohort studies.

KEY POINTS

· Early recognition of infants at risk of failure of noninvasive ventilation is important to prevent complications.. · It is desirable to identify patients who would benefit from early rescue surfactant treatment.. · RSS in first 3 hours can be used as a predictor of failure of noninvasive respiratory support..

The Outcomes of Preterm Infants with Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated by Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy and Non-Invasive Ventilation

In recent years, the utilization of minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) and Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as the primary respiratory assistance has become increasingly prevalent among preterm infants with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). This study aims to compare the outcomes between MIST administered with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), with the objective of exploring the respiratory therapeutic benefits of these two approaches. This retrospective study collected data from the neonatal intensive care unit of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital spanning from January 2016 to June 2021. Infants were divided into two groups based on the type of NIV utilized. The NCPAP group comprised 32 infants, while the NIPPV group comprised 22 infants. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences: the NIPPV group had a smaller gestational age, lower birth weight, higher proportion of female infants, and earlier initiation of MIST. Additionally, the NIPPV group exhibited higher incidence rates of retinopathy of prematurity, longer respiratory support duration, prolonged hospitalization, and mortality. However, upon adjustment, these differences were not statistically significant. Analysis of venous blood gas and respiratory parameter changes indicated that both the NCPAP and NIPPV groups experienced improvements in oxygenation and ventilation following MIST.

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Compared to Intubation, Surfactant, Rapid Extubation Method in Preterm Neonates: An Umbrella Review

INTRODUCTION

In spontaneously breathing neonates, surfactant can be administered via thin catheter while enabling the own breathing (less invasive surfactant administration [LISA]). Alternatively, the neonate is intubated for surfactant delivery (intubation, surfactant, rapid extubation [INSURE]). Thus, the aim was to provide an overview of the efficacy of the LISA compared to INSURE.

METHODS

We performed an umbrella review of previous meta-analyses including randomized controlled trials. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in July 2023. Two authors screened the search results, and systematic reviews with meta-analyses that focused on LISA versus INSURE were included. One author extracted, and another author validated the extracted data. AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS evaluations were performed by two authors independently.

RESULTS

A total of 9 systematic reviews with meta-analyses were included. The quality according to AMSTAR-2 was high in one, moderate in one, low in three, and critically low in four. According to ROBIS, the risk of bias was low in three and high in six of the reviews. LISA was more effective than INSURE in preventing mechanical ventilation (8/8 reviews), death or BPD (4/4 reviews), death (3/9 reviews), and BPD (3/9 reviews).

CONCLUSIONS

All the included systematic reviews and meta-analyses reported LISA to be more effective than INSURE in terms of need for mechanical ventilation and death or BPD. However, the quality of the published systematic reviews has been mostly deficient. Future systematic reviews should focus on reporting quality.

A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies on Neonatal Respiratory Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units

(1) Background: Our survey aimed to gather information on respiratory care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) in the European and Mediterranean region. (2) Methods: Cross-sectional electronic survey. An 89-item questionnaire focusing on the current modes, devices, and strategies employed in neonatal units in the domain of respiratory care was sent to directors/heads of 528 NICUs. The adherence to the "European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome" was assessed for comparison. (3) Results: The response rate was 75% (397/528 units). In most Delivery Rooms (DRs), full resuscitation is given from 22 to 23 weeks gestational age. A T-piece device with facial masks or short binasal prongs are commonly used for respiratory stabilization. Initial FiO2 is set as per guidelines. Most units use heated humidified gases to prevent heat loss. SpO2 and ECG monitoring are largely performed. Surfactant in the DR is preferentially given through Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation (INSURE) or Less-Invasive-Surfactant-Administration (LISA) techniques. DR caffeine is widespread. In the NICUs, most of the non-invasive modes used are nasal CPAP and nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation. Volume-targeted, synchronized intermittent positive-pressure ventilation is the preferred invasive mode to treat acute respiratory distress. Pulmonary recruitment maneuvers are common approaches. During NICU stay, surfactant administration is primarily guided by FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2 ratio, and it is mostly performed through LISA or INSURE. Steroids are used to facilitate extubation and prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia. (4) Conclusions: Overall, clinical practices are in line with the 2022 European Guidelines, but there are some divergences. These data will allow stakeholders to make comparisons and to identify opportunities for improvement.

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) Versus INSURE Method in Preterm Infants: a Retrospective Study

Background

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Early nasal CPAP and selective administration of surfactant via the endotracheal tube are widely used in the treatment of RDS in preterm infants.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation after surfactant delivery between LISA-treated and INSURE-treated premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

Methods

Retrospective registry-based cohort study enrolled 36 newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of the "Santa Maria" Hospital of Terni between 2016 and 2023. As a primary outcome, we followed the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of life, while the secondary outcomes were major neonatal morbidities and death before discharge.

Results

The LISA group and the INSURE group included 13 and 23 newborns respectively. Demographic features showed no significant differences between the two groups. The need for mechanical ventilation in the first 72 hours of life was similar in both groups (p >0.99). There were no significant differences in morbidities.

Conclusion

LISA and INSURE are equally effective modalities for surfactant administration for the treatment of RDS in preterm infants.

Video laryngoscopy-assisted less-invasive surfactant administration quality improvement initiative

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of quality improvement methodology in transitioning from delivery of surfactant by INSURE (INtubation-SURfactant administration-Extubation) to video laryngoscope-assisted LISA (less-invasive surfactant administration) for infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) receiving non-invasive ventilatory support.

SETTING

Two large neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) at Northwell Health (New Hyde Park, New York, USA).

STUDY POPULATION

Infants with RDS receiving continuous positive airway pressure in the NICU and eligible for surfactant administration.

RESULTS

LISA was initiated in our NICUs in January 2021, after extensive guideline development, education programmes, hands-on training and provider credentialing. Our Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Timely aim was to deliver surfactant by LISA for 65% of total doses by 31 December 2021. This goal was achieved within 1 month of go-live. In total, 115 infants received at least one dose of surfactant during the year. Of those, 79 (69%) received it via LISA and 36 (31%) via INSURE. Two Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles contributed to improved adherence to guidelines on timely surfactant administration and both written and video documentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Safe and effective introduction of LISA with the use of video laryngoscopy is achievable with careful planning, clear clinical guidelines, adequate hands-on training and comprehensive safety and quality control.

Variation in delivery room management of preterm infants across Europe: a survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies

The aim of the present study, endorsed by the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS) and the Italian Society of Neonatology (SIN), was to analyze the current delivery room (DR) stabilization practices in a large sample of European birth centers that care for preterm infants with gestational age (GA) < 33 weeks. Cross-sectional electronic survey was used in this study. A questionnaire focusing on the current DR practices for infants < 33 weeks' GA, divided in 6 neonatal resuscitation domains, was individually sent to the directors of European neonatal facilities, made available as a web-based link. A comparison was made between hospitals grouped into 5 geographical areas (Eastern Europe (EE), Italy (ITA), Mediterranean countries (MC), Turkey (TUR), and Western Europe (WE)) and between high- and low-volume units across Europe. Two hundred and sixty-two centers from 33 European countries responded to the survey. At the time of the survey, approximately 20,000 very low birth weight (VLBW, < 1500 g) infants were admitted to the participating hospitals, with a median (IQR) of 48 (27-89) infants per center per year. Significant differences between the 5 geographical areas concerned: the volume of neonatal care, ranging from 86 (53-206) admitted VLBW infants per center per year in TUR to 35 (IQR 25-53) in MC; the umbilical cord (UC) management, being the delayed cord clamping performed in < 50% of centers in EE, ITA, and MC, and the cord milking the preferred strategy in TUR; the spotty use of some body temperature control strategies, including thermal mattress mainly employed in WE, and heated humidified gases for ventilation seldom available in MC; and some of the ventilation practices, mainly in regard to the initial FiO2 for < 28 weeks' GA infants, pressures selected for ventilation, and the preferred interface to start ventilation. Specifically, 62.5% of TUR centers indicated the short binasal prongs as the preferred interface, as opposed to the face mask which is widely adopted as first choice in > 80% of the rest of the responding units; the DR surfactant administration, which ranges from 44.4% of the birth centers in MC to 87.5% in WE; and, finally, the ethical issues around the minimal GA limit to provide full resuscitation, ranging from 22 to 25 weeks across Europe. A comparison between high- and low-volume units showed significant differences in the domains of UC management and ventilation practices.    Conclusion: Current DR practice and ethical choices show similarities and divergences across Europe. Some areas of assistance, like UC management and DR ventilation strategies, would benefit of standardization. Clinicians and stakeholders should consider this information when allocating resources and planning European perinatal programs. What is Known: • Delivery room (DR) support of preterm infants has a direct influence on both immediate survival and long-term morbidity. • Resuscitation practices for preterm infants often deviate from the internationally defined algorithms. What is New: • Current DR practice and ethical choices show similarities and divergences across Europe. Some areas of assistance, like UC management and DR ventilation strategies, would benefit of standardization. • Clinicians and stakeholders should consider this information when allocating resources and planning European perinatal programs.

Response to aerosolized calfactant in infants with respiratory distress syndrome; a post-hoc analysis of AERO-02 trial

BACKGROUND

The aerosolized calfactant decreased the need for intubation in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (AERO-02 trial).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the oxygenation response to aerosolized calfactant among infants born 28 0/7-36 6/7 weeks with RDS in the AERO-02 trial.

METHODS

Trends in hourly fraction of oxygen (FiO2), mean airway pressure (MAP) and respiratory severity score (RSS) were compared between the aerosolized calfactant (AC) and usual care (UC) groups from time of randomization for 72 h.

RESULTS

A total of 353 subjects were included in the study. FiO2, MAP, and RSS were lower in the UC group. FiO2 decrease was seen after the first aerosolized calfactant dose.

CONCLUSION

FiO2, MAP, and RSS were lower in the UC group. This is likely due to early and higher rate of liquid surfactant administration in the UC group. Decrease in FiO2 was noted in the AC group after the first aerosolization.

Variability of neonatal premedication practices for endotracheal intubation and LISA in the UK (NeoPRINT survey)

OBJECTIVE

The NeoPRINT Survey was designed to assess premedication practices throughout UK NHS Trusts for both neonatal endotracheal intubation and less invasive surfactant administration (LISA).

DESIGN

An online survey consisting of multiple choice and open answer questions covering preferences of premedication for endotracheal intubation and LISA was distributed over a 67-day period. Responses were then analysed using STATA IC 16.0.

SETTING

Online survey distributed to all UK Neonatal Units (NNUs).

PARTICIPANTS

The survey evaluated premedication practices for endotracheal intubation and LISA in neonates requiring these procedures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The use of different premedication categories as well as individual medications within each category was analysed to create a picture of typical clinical practice across the UK.

RESULTS

The response rate for the survey was 40.8 % (78/191). Premedication was used in all hospitals for endotracheal intubation but overall, 50 % (39/78) of the units that have responded, use premedications for LISA. Individual clinician preference had an impact on premedication practices within each NNU.

CONCLUSION

The wide variability on first-line premedication for endotracheal intubation noted in this survey could be overcome using best available evidence through consensus guidance driven by organisations such as British Association of Perinatal |Medicine (BAPM). Secondly, the divisive view around LISA premedication practices noted in this survey requires an answer through a randomised controlled trial.

RDS-NExT workshop: consensus statements for the use of surfactant in preterm neonates with RDS

OBJECTIVE

To provide the best clinical practice guidance for surfactant use in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The RDS-Neonatal Expert Taskforce (RDS-NExT) initiative was intended to add to existing evidence and clinical guidelines, where evidence is lacking, with input from an expert panel.

STUDY DESIGN

An expert panel of healthcare providers specializing in neonatal intensive care was convened and administered a survey questionnaire, followed by 3 virtual workshops. A modified Delphi method was used to obtain consensus around topics in surfactant use in neonatal RDS.

RESULT

Statements focused on establishing RDS diagnosis and indicators for surfactant administration, surfactant administration methods and techniques, and other considerations. After discussion and voting, consensus was achieved on 20 statements.

CONCLUSION

These consensus statements provide practical guidance for surfactant administration in preterm neonates with RDS, with a goal to contribute to improving the care of neonates and providing a stimulus for further investigation to bridge existing knowledge gaps.

Purpose Built Catheters for Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy: Experience from a Canadian Tertiary Level Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Background

Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST), a method of surfactant delivery via a thin catheter during spontaneous breathing, is an increasingly popular alternative to intubation and surfactant administration. Recently, purpose-built catheters for MIST received regulatory approval in Canada and became available for use. However, procedural success and user experience with such catheters have not been described.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included neonates who received MIST using purpose-built catheters between January 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022. Two types of purpose-built catheters were used in this period - SurfCath™ and BLEScath™. Procedural success, number of attempts, and adverse events in neonates receiving MIST via the two catheters were compared using chi-square or Fisher's tests. User experience was described using an ease-of-use scale.

Results

Thirty-seven neonates met eligibility criteria; 22 received MIST via SurfCath™, whereas 15 received MIST via BLEScath™. Success rates were 91% in SurfCath™ and 93% in BLEScath™ (P> 0.994). Failed attempts were lower in SurfCath™ (23%) in comparison to BLEScath™ (33%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.708). Among operators, 90% found SurfCath™ very easy/relatively easy to use compared to 43% of users reflecting the same degree of use with BLEScath™ (P=.021). There was no difference in adverse events.

Conclusion

This is the first study in Canada to report MIST with purpose-built catheters. Overall, the success rate was equally high with both catheters. Users subjectively reported higher ease of use with SurfCath™. Commercially available purpose-built catheters should facilitate universal adaptation of the MIST method.

Prevention of Chronic Morbidities in Extremely Premature Newborns with LISA-nCPAP Respiratory Therapy and Adjuvant Perinatal Strategies

Less invasive surfactant administration techniques, together with nasal continuous airway pressure (LISA-nCPAP) ventilation, an emerging noninvasive ventilation (NIV) technique in neonatology, are gaining more significance, even in extremely premature newborns (ELBW), under 27 weeks of gestational age. In this review, studies on LISA-nCPAP are compiled with an emphasis on short- and long-term morbidities associated with prematurity. Several perinatal preventative and therapeutic investigations are also discussed in order to start integrated therapies as numerous organ-saving techniques in addition to lung-protective ventilations. Two thirds of immature newborns can start their lives on NIV, and one third of them never need mechanical ventilation. With adjuvant intervention, these ratios are expected to be increased, resulting in better outcomes. Optimized cardiopulmonary transition, especially physiologic cord clamping, could have an additively beneficial effect on patient outcomes gained from NIV. Organ development and angiogenesis are strictly linked not only in the immature lung and retina, but also possibly in the kidney, and optimized interventions using angiogenic growth factors could lead to better morbidity-free survival. Corticosteroids, caffeine, insulin, thyroid hormones, antioxidants, N-acetylcysteine, and, moreover, the immunomodulatory components of mother's milk are also discussed as adjuvant treatments, since immature newborns deserve more complex neonatal interventions.

Surfactant administration in preterm babies (28-36 weeks) with respiratory distress syndrome: LISA versus InSurE, an open-label randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

INtubate-SURfactant-Extubate (InSurE) approach is traditional method of surfactant delivery in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Newer, less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) techniques lessen the need for mechanical ventilation and its adverse consequences. Evidence on the favorable effects of LISA can't be extrapolated from developed to developing countries. Aim of study is to compare the effectiveness of InSurE and LISA.

OBJECTIVES

Primary outcome was to find need of intubation and mechanical ventilation within 72 h of birth. Neonates were followed until discharge/death for adverse events and complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. Preterm neonates with diagnosis of RDS were randomized in two groups (InSurE or LISA) to receive surfactant soon after birth. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) was used as primary mode of respiratory support.

RESULTS

A total of 150 neonates were analyzed (75 in each group). Insignificant statistical difference was seen in the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation within 72 h of birth between the two groups (InSurE, 30 [40%] and LISA, 30 [40%], relative risk 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.48). Twelve percent (n = 9, LISA group) and 14.6% (n = 11 InSurE group) had adverse events during the procedure. Also, we observed insignificant statistical difference in the rates of major complications or duration of respiratory support, hospital stay, and mortality.

CONCLUSION

LISA and InSurE are equally effectiSpontaneously breathing pretermve for surfactant administration in the treatment of RDS, when NIPPV is the primary mode of respiratory support. More RCTs are required to compare the efficacy and long-term outcomes of LISA with InSurE.

European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2022 Update

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) care pathways evolve slowly as new evidence emerges. We report the sixth version of "European Guidelines for the Management of RDS" by a panel of experienced European neonatologists and an expert perinatal obstetrician based on available literature up to end of 2022. Optimising outcome for babies with RDS includes prediction of risk of preterm delivery, appropriate maternal transfer to a perinatal centre, and appropriate and timely use of antenatal steroids. Evidence-based lung-protective management includes initiation of non-invasive respiratory support from birth, judicious use of oxygen, early surfactant administration, caffeine therapy, and avoidance of intubation and mechanical ventilation where possible. Methods of ongoing non-invasive respiratory support have been further refined and may help reduce chronic lung disease. As technology for delivering mechanical ventilation improves, the risk of causing lung injury should decrease, although minimising time spent on mechanical ventilation by targeted use of postnatal corticosteroids remains essential. The general care of infants with RDS is also reviewed, including emphasis on appropriate cardiovascular support and judicious use of antibiotics as being important determinants of best outcome. We would like to dedicate this guideline to the memory of Professor Henry Halliday who died on November 12, 2022.These updated guidelines contain evidence from recent Cochrane reviews and medical literature since 2019. Strength of evidence supporting recommendations has been evaluated using the GRADE system. There are changes to some of the previous recommendations as well as some changes to the strength of evidence supporting recommendations that have not changed. This guideline has been endorsed by the European Society for Paediatric Research (ESPR) and the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS).

Sedation for less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sedation to preterm neonates receiving less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) for respiratory distress syndrome is controversial.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OS) to evaluate the effect of sedative drugs for LISA on respiratory outcomes and adverse effects.

RESULTS

One RCT (78 neonates) and two OS (519 neonates) were analyzed in pairwise meta-analysis and 30 studies (2164 neonates) in proportion-based meta-analysis. Sedative drugs might not affect the duration of the procedure [RCT: mean difference (MD) (95% CI); -11 (-90; 67) s; OS: MD 95% CI: -60 (-178; 58) s; low certainty of evidence (CoE)]. Evidence for success at the first attempt and rescue intubation was uncertain (very low CoE). The risk of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation [RCT: 1.97 (1.38-2.81); OS: RR, 95% CI: 2.96 (1.46; 6.00), low CoE], desaturation [RCT: RR, 95% CI: 1.30 (1.03; 1.65), low CoE], and apnea [OS: RR, 95% CI: 3.13 (1.35; 7.24), very low CoE] might be increased with sedation. Bradycardia, hypotension, and mechanical ventilation were comparable between groups (low CoE).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of sedative drugs for LISA temporarily affects the newborn's breathing. Further trials are warranted to explore the use of sedation for LISA.

IMPACT

The effect of sedative drugs (analgesics, sedatives, anesthetics) compared to the effect of no-sedation for LISA in preterm infants with RDS is underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the impact of sedative drugs compared to no-sedation for LISA on short-term pulmonary outcomes and potential adverse events. Sedative drugs for LISA temporarily affect the newborn's breathing (desaturation, apnea) and increase the need for nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. For most outcomes, certainty of evidence is low/very low.

Device positioning with LISA vs. INSURE: a crossover randomized controlled manikin trial

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare time of device positioning, success of procedure and operator's opinion with LISA vs. INSURE in a manikin simulating an extremely low birthweight infant.

METHODS

A randomized controlled crossover (AB/BA) trial of surfactant administration with LISA vs. INSURE in a preterm manikin. Forty-two tertiary hospital consultants and pediatric residents with previous experience with LISA and INSURE participated. The primary outcome measure was the time of device positioning. The secondary outcome measures were: success of the first attempt, number of attempts, correct depth, and participant's opinion on difficulty in using the device.

RESULTS

Median time of device positioning was shorter with LISA vs. INSURE (median difference -8 s, 95% confidence interval -16 to -1 s; p = .04). Success at first attempt was 35/40 with LISA (83%) and 31/40 with INSURE (74%) (p = .42). Median number of attempts was 1 (IQR 1-1) with LISA and 1 (IQR 1-2) with INSURE (p = .08). Correct depth was achieved in 30/40 with LISA (71%) and 37/40 with INSURE (88%) (p = .12). Participants found LISA easier to insert in the trachea (p = .002) but INSURE easier to place at the correct depth (p = .008). Handling the device (p = .43), visualizing the glottis (p = .17) and overall difficulty in using the device (p = .13) were not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

In a preterm manikin model, positioning a thin catheter (LISA) was quicker and easier than a tracheal tube (INSURE), but the magnitude of the difference was unlikely to be clinically relevant and the tracheal tube was easier to place at the correct depth.

REGISTRATION

clinicaltrial.gov NCT04944108.

Comment on "Bilayer aggregate microstructure determines viscoelasticity of lung surfactant suspensions" by C. O. Ciutara and J. A. Zasadzinski, Soft Matter, 2021, , 5170-5182

For applications of pulmonary surfactant delivery to the lungs, the question of rheology of the existing clinical formulations is of upmost importance. Recently, Ciutara and Zasadsinky (C. O. Ciutara and J. A. Zasadzinski, Soft Matter, 2021, 17, 5170-5182.) measured the rheological properties of Infasurf®, Survanta® and Curosurf®, three of the most used pulmonary surfactant substitutes. This study revealed that these fluids are shear-thinning and characterized by a yield stress. The results obtained by Ciutara et al. on Curosurf® differ from our results published in L.-P.-A. Thai, F. Mousseau, E. Oikonomou, M. Radiom and J.-F. Berret, Colloids Surf., B, 2019, 178, 337-345. and in L.-P.-A. Thai, F. Mousseau, E. Oikonomou, M. Radiom and J.-F. Berret, ACS Nano, 2020, 14, 466-475. In contrast, we found that Curosurf® suspensions are viscous Newtonian or slightly shear-thinning fluids, with no evidence of yield stress. The purpose of this Comment is to discuss possible causes for the discrepancy between the two studies, and to suggest that for biological fluids such as surfactant substitutes, the microrheology technique of rotational magnetic spectroscopy (MRS) can provide valuable results.

Cost-saving effect of early less invasive surfactant administration versus continuous positive airway pressure therapy alone for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Early rescue surfactant therapy using less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) can reduce the need for mechanical ventilation and avoid complications in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. The purpose of this study was to estimate the budget impact of LISA compared with management based on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) alone and rescue surfactant therapy in case of CPAP failure.

METHODS

A budget impact model was built comparing LISA with CPAP alone in order to estimate the potential resource consumption and budget impact from the perspective of the National Health Service in England. A literature review was conducted to populate the model. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to characterise the existing uncertainty and to explore the contribution of individual model parameters to the overall budget impact.

RESULTS

Early rescue with LISA is expected to reduce resource consumption and costs compared with conservative therapy based on CPAP alone for preterm infants born at 25-32 weeks gestation. Savings are higher for preterm infants of 25-28 weeks (expected budget impact -£5146 per case, 95% credible interval (CrI) -£22 403 to £13, probability of being cost saving 97.4%) than for preterm infants of 29-32 weeks (-£176, 95% CrI -£4279 to £339, probability of being cost saving 85%). The impact of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and intraventricular haemorrhage on resource consumption and the expected reduction in the incidence of BPD with LISA are the most influential parameters on the budget.

CONCLUSIONS

Early rescue with LISA used in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome and fraction of inspired oxygen ≥0.3 is expected to be cost saving compared with management based on CPAP alone, particularly in those born at 25-28 weeks gestation.

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Review of Current Evidence of Clinical Outcomes With Beractant

Evidence supporting clinical recommendations or approval for less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) has primarily examined heterogeneous or small-volume (e.g., 1.25-2.5 mL/kg) animal-derived surfactant regimens. To address the evidence gap for larger-volume (e.g., 4-5 mL/kg) animal-derived surfactants, the aim of this review was to evaluate and summarize LISA literature for widely used larger-volume beractant. Surfactant treatment and the LISA technique were initially summarized. The available literature on beractant with LISA was thoroughly assessed and reviewed, including a recent systematic analysis, studies from regions where access or preferences may influence reliance on larger-volume surfactants, and investigations of short- and long-term outcomes. The available literature indicated improved short-term outcomes, including less need for mechanical ventilation, death, or bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and no negative long-term developmental outcomes when beractant was administered via LISA compared with older, more invasive techniques. The rates of short-term outcomes were similar to those previously observed in examinations of LISA with small-volume surfactants, including in populations reflecting very preterm infants. As uptake of LISA is expected to increase, future research directions for larger-volume surfactants include cost-effectiveness evaluations and robust examinations of repeat dosing and surfactant reflux to further inform clinical practice. This review provides a detailed assessment of the literature describing surfactant and LISA, with a focus on studies of beractant. Collectively, the available evidence supports the use of beractant with LISA based both on short-term and long-term outcomes relative to more invasive techniques and comparability of outcomes with small-volume surfactants and may be valuable in guiding clinical decision-making.

A New Approach of Several Minimally Invasive Procedures for Improvement of the Outcome in Preterm Infants

BACKGROUND: Based on the last update of European Consensus Guidelines on Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome, the following study is new for our clinic approach for minimally invasive respiratory support in preterm infants. AIM: The aim is to find out if the implementation of several minimally invasive procedures leads to a reduction of the frequency and severity of chronic complications and improved outcomes in extremely premature infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infants are below 30 gestational weeks, divided into two groups – therapeutic – 37 infants on standardized early respiratory management protocol which includes: High-flow continuous positive airway pressure (20l/min ≥ 15 PEEP) in the delivery room, support of spontaneous breathing and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, avoidance of hypothermia and LISA shortly after birth, and control group – 46 infants that received standard respiratory support (positive pressure ventilation – invasive and non-invasive in the delivery room, most infants ≤ 27 weeks gestational age were intubated and received early surfactant, extubation “when being ready” – usually after few days). RESULTS: The duration of mechanical ventilation, oxygen therapy, and hospital stay is shorter in the therapeutic group (p < 0.05). Severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia is not found in the interventional group, 26% of the patients in the control group have severe form of the disease (p = 0.001). Severe intraventricular hemorrhages are found in 11% of the infants in the therapeutic group and 28% in the control group (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Due to the changed protocol, we report increased survival of ELBW infants without severe chronic complications. The acute pulmonary injury, acquired in the perinatal period, is directly connected with the development of BPD. For this reason, all the changes that we introduced in our clinic (heat management, support of spontaneous breathing, “open up” lungs – high flow PEEP/CPAP, and LISA during spontaneous breathing) contribute to the lower frequency of severe chronic complications and high percentage of ELBW infants, who do not develop severe BPD.

Alternative Methods of Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: State of the Art

For preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome, delivery of surfactant via brief intubation (INtubate, SURfactant, Extubate; InSurE) has been the standard technique of surfactant administration. However, this method requires intubation and positive pressure ventilation. It is thought that even the short exposure to positive pressure inflations may be enough to initiate the cascade of events that lead to lung injury in the smallest neonates. In an effort to avoid tracheal intubation and positive pressure ventilation, several alternative and less invasive techniques of exogenous surfactant administration have been developed over the years. These have been investigated in clinical studies, including randomized clinical trials, and have demonstrated advantages such as a decrease in the need for mechanical ventilation and incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. These newer techniques of surfactant delivery also have the benefit of being easier to perform. Surfactant delivery via pharyngeal instillation, laryngeal mask, aerosolization, and placement of a thin catheter are being actively pursued in research. We present a contemporary review of surfactant administration for respiratory distress syndrome via these alternative methods in the hope of guiding physicians in their choices for surfactant application in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Analgosedation before Less-Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Surfactant therapy is the cornerstone of respiratory distress syndrome management. "Less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA)" is now recommended for spontaneously breathing preterm infants. Analgosedation remains controversial as 52% of European neonatologists do not use any. This systematic review aims to describe the efficacy and safety of different drugs for analgosedation during LISA.

METHODS

MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library of Trials were searched independently by 2 reviewers for studies on sedation or analgesia for LISA, without filters or limits.

RESULTS

Eight studies (1 randomized controlled trial) recruiting 945 infants were included. Infant pain was significantly reduced, with more infants evaluated as comfortable. Failure, defined as need for intubation or for a second dose of surfactant, was not different between sedated and unsedated groups. Analgosedation was associated with a higher occurrence of desaturation and need for positive pressure ventilation during procedure, but the need for mechanical ventilation within 24 or 72 h of life was not significantly different. There does not seem to be any difference in clinical tolerance and complications (e.g., hypotension, mortality, air leaks, etc.). Procedural conditions were evaluated as good or excellent in 83% after sedation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Analgesia or sedative drugs increase infant comfort and allow good procedural conditions, with a limited impact on the clinical evolution. Questions remain about the best choice of drugs and dosages, with the constraint to maintain spontaneous breathing and have a rapid offset. Further good quality studies are needed to provide additional evidence to supplement those limited existing data.

A systematic review of surfactant delivery via laryngeal mask airway, pharyngeal instillation, and aerosolization: Methods, limitations, and outcomes

Less invasive surfactant administration methods without laryngoscopy and endotracheal catheterization include delivery via laryngeal mask airway, pharyngeal instillation, and aerosolization. These less invasive techniques are promising and have several advantages over INSURE (Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation) and thin catheter techniques. The objective of this review is to discuss the requisites, techniques, short-term outcomes, and adverse events associated with these methods.

Thin-catheter Surfactant Application for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Spontaneously Breathing Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Surfactant application by a thin catheter represented by the term less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) for respiratory distress syndrome in spontaneously breathing preterm infants was developed as an alternative to endotracheal intubation.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effects of LISA when compared to the socalled intubation-surfactant-extubation (INSURE) and the standard endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV). The primary outcome was the composite incidence of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia at a postmenstrual age of 36 weeks. The secondary outcome was the composite incidence of seven other severe adverse events. On 06 October 2021, we searched randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the ICTRP Registry.

RESULTS

We included 18 RCTs. The pooled data on the primary outcome favored LISA when compared to either INSURE (risk ratio 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.88) or MV (risk ratio 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.99). The pooled data on the second outcome also favored LISA when compared to INSURE (risk ratio 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.94) and MV (risk ratio 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.96).

CONCLUSION

The findings showed that surfactant application by non-intubation respiratory support and the use of a thin catheter may decrease the composite risk of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The included data support the view that LISA should be considered the preferred treatment option in eligible infants.

Alveolar type II cells and pulmonary surfactant in COVID-19 era

In this review, we discuss the role of pulmonary surfactant in the host defense against respiratory pathogens, including novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. In the lower respiratory system, the virus uses angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor in conjunction with serine protease TMPRSS2, expressed by alveolar type II (ATII) cells as one of the SARS-CoV-2 target cells, to enter. ATII cells are the main source of surfactant. After their infection and the resulting damage, the consequences may be severe and may include injury to the alveolar-capillary barrier, lung edema, inflammation, ineffective gas exchange, impaired lung mechanics and reduced oxygenation, which resembles acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) of other etiology. The aim of this review is to highlight the key role of ATII cells and reduced surfactant in the pathogenesis of the respiratory form of COVID-19 and to emphasize the rational basis for exogenous surfactant therapy in COVID-19 ARDS patients.

Improved Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Success in Preterm Infants after Procedure Standardization

Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) has been introduced at our tertiary Level IV perinatal center since 2016 with an unsatisfactory success rate, which we attributed to an inconsistent, non-standardized approach and ambiguous patient inclusion criteria. This study aimed to improve the LISA success rate to at least 75% within 12 months by implementing a highly standardized LISA approach combined with team training. The Plan Do Study Act method of quality improvement was used for this initiative. Baseline assessment included a review of patient medical records 12 months before the intervention regarding patient characteristics, method success rate, respiratory, and adverse outcomes. A multi-professional team developed a standardized LISA approach and a training program including an educational film, checklists, pocket cards, and team briefings. Twenty-one preterm infants received LISA before and 24 after the intervention. The mean LISA success rate improved from 62% before the intervention to 92% (p = 0.029) after the intervention. Implementing a highly standardized LISA approach and multi-professional team training significantly improved the methods’ success rate.

Impact of early respiratory care for extremely preterm infants

Despite advances in neonatal intensive care, more than half of surviving infants born extremely preterm (EP; < 28 weeks' gestation) develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Prevention of BPD is critical because of its associated mortality and morbidity, including adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes and respiratory health in later childhood and beyond. The respiratory care of EP infants begins before birth, then continues in the delivery room and throughout the primary hospitalization. This chapter will review the evidence for interventions after birth that might improve outcomes for infants born EP, including the timing of umbilical cord clamping, strategies to avoid or minimize exposure to mechanical ventilation, modes of mechanical ventilation and non-invasive respiratory support, oxygen saturation targets, postnatal corticosteroids and other adjunct therapies.

Diagnosis and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is the most common chronic lung disease in infants and is associated with increased mortality, respiratory morbidity, neurodevelopmental impairment, and increased healthcare costs. In parallel with advances made in the field of neonatal intensive care, the phenotype of BPD has evolved from a fibrocystic disease affecting late preterm infants to one of impaired parenchymal development and dysregulated vascular growth predominantly affecting infants born before 29 weeks' gestational age. BPD has been shown to have significant lifelong consequences. Adults with BPD have been found to have abnormal lung function tests, reduced exercise tolerance, and may be at increased risk for developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Evidence shows that BPD occurs secondary to genetic-environmental interactions in an immature lung. In this review, we evaluate the various clinical definitions, imaging modalities, and biomarker data that are helpful in making an early diagnosis of BPD. In addition, we evaluate recent evidence about the prevention and treatment of BPD. We discuss the invasive and non-invasive ventilation strategies and pharmacological agents used in the early, evolving, and established phases of BPD.

The Intertemporal Role of Respiratory Support in Improving Neonatal Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Defining improvements in healthcare can be challenging due to the need to assess multiple outcomes and measures. In neonates, although progress in respiratory support has been a key factor in improving survival, the same degree of improvement has not been documented in certain outcomes, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia. By exploring the evolution of neonatal respiratory care over the last 60 years, this review highlights not only the scientific advances that occurred with the application of invasive mechanical ventilation but also the weakness of the existing knowledge. The contributing role of non-invasive ventilation and less-invasive surfactant administration methods as well as of certain pharmacological therapies is also discussed. Moreover, we analyze the cost-benefit of neonatal care-respiratory support and present future challenges and perspectives.

Surfactant delivery via thin catheters: Methods, limitations, and outcomes

Various less invasive surfactant administration strategies like surfactant replacement therapy via thin catheters, laryngeal mask airway, pharyngeal instillation, and nebulized surfactant are increasingly being practiced to avoid the harmful effects of endotracheal intubation and ventilation. Numerous studies have been done to study surfactant replacement via thin catheters whereas little data is available for other methods. However, there are variations in premedication policies, type of respiratory support used in these studies. Surfactant delivery using thin catheters has been reported to be associated with decrease in the need for mechanical ventilation (MV), duration of MV, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neonatal mortality. With the current evidence, among all the available surfactant delivery methods, the one using thin catheters appears to be the most feasible and beneficial to improve clinical neonatal outcomes.

Impact of Catheter Choice on Procedural Success of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy

OBJECTIVE

 Surfactant delivery via a thin endotracheal catheter during spontaneous breathing; a technique called minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) is an alternative to intubation and surfactant administration. Procedural details among different centers vary, with marked differences in the choice of catheter to instill surfactant. Studies report use of feeding catheters, multiaccess suction catheters, vascular catheters, and more recently custom-built catheters for this purpose. The impact of choice of catheter on procedural success and procedural adverse effects has not been reported. Our present study compares the procedural success and adverse effects of MIST using a semirigid vascular catheter (16G Angiocath-Hobart Method) versus a flexible multiaccess catheter (MAC).

STUDY DESIGN

 This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data at a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit in Southwestern Ontario. All neonates who received surfactant via MIST between May 1, 2016 and September 30, 2020 were included in the study. Relevant baseline characteristics and data on procedural details (premedication, type of catheter, etc.) were collected. The procedural success, number of attempts, and adverse effects between neonates who received MIST via MAC and 16G Angiocath was compared by using Chi-square test or Fisher's test as appropriate. A p-value of less that 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

 A total of 139 neonates received surfactant via MIST method during the study period. Moreover, 93 neonates received the surfactant via MAC, while 46 received it via Angiocath. The baseline demographic characteristics in the two group were similar. A higher proportion of neonates in Angiocath group received Atropine (100 vs. 76%, p = 0.002) and Fentanyl (98 vs. 36%, p < 0.001) than the MAC group.The procedural success was 91% in the Angiocath group and 89% in the MAC group (p > 0.99). Multiple attempts were needed in 24% of neonates in the Angiocath group and 37% in the MAC group (p = 0.158). More episodes of desaturations were noted in the Angiocath group (89%) than the MAC group (69%; p = 0.012). Other rates of common adverse effects were similar between the two groups. On exploratory analysis fentanyl use held significant association with less success, more desaturation, apneic episodes, and need of positive pressure ventilation /intubation.

CONCLUSION

 The overall procedural success of MIST is similar in both catheter groups. The proportion of neonates requiring multiple attempts was lower with the Angiocath, though difference was not statistically significant. Desaturation episodes were seen more frequently in the Angiocath group, which was related to higher use of procedural sedation in this group.

KEY POINTS

· MIST is emerging as a less invasive method of surfactant delivery that has proven clinical benefits.. · Considerable, procedural variation is reported, particularly regarding choice of catheter.. · Our present study compares the procedural success and adverse effects of MIST using a semirigid vascular catheter (16G Angiocath-Hobart method) versus a flexible MAC.. · High and comparable procedural success was seen in both groups..

Introducing Less-Invasive Surfactant Administration into a Level IV NICU: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA), a newer technique of delivering surfactant via a thin catheter, avoids mechanical ventilation. LISA has been widely adopted in Europe but less so in the US. Our goal was to increase the percentage of surfactant delivered via LISA from 0% to 51% by 12/2020. Project planning and literature review started 12/2019, and included a standardized equipment kit and simulation training sessions. We began Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles in 6/2020. Initial exclusions for LISA were gestational age (GA) <28 weeks (w) or ≥36 w, intubation in the delivery room, or PCO2 >70 if known; GA exclusion is now <25 w. From 6 to 12/2020, 97 patients received surfactant, 35 (36%) via LISA. When non-LISA-eligible patients were excluded, 35/42 (83%) received LISA successfully. There were only 2/37 patients for whom LISA was not able to be performed. Three LISA infants required mechanical ventilation in the first week of life. Sedation remained an initial challenge but improved when sucrose was used routinely. LISA was safely and successfully introduced in our NICU.

Neonatal Platelet Transfusions: Starting Again

Preterm neonates with severe thrombocytopenia are frequently prescribed prophylactic platelet transfusions despite no evidence of benefit. Neonatal platelet transfusion practice varies, both nationally and internationally. Volumes and rates of transfusion in neonatology are based on historic precedent and lack an evidence base. The etiology of harm from platelet transfusions is poorly understood. Neonates are expected to be the longest surviving recipients of blood produce transfusions, and so avoiding transfusion associated harm is critical in this cohort. This article reviews the evidence for and against platelet transfusion in the neonate and identifies areas of future potential neonatal platelet transfusion research.

New Pharmacologic Approaches to Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia is the most common long-term respiratory morbidity of preterm infants, with the risk of development proportional to the degree of prematurity. While its pathophysiologic and histologic features have changed over time as neonatal demographics and respiratory therapies have evolved, it is now thought to be characterized by impaired distal lung growth and abnormal pulmonary microvascular development. Though the exact sequence of events leading to the development of BPD has not been fully elucidated and likely varies among patients, it is thought to result from inflammatory and mechanical/oxidative injury from chronic ventilatory support in fragile, premature lungs susceptible to injury from surfactant deficiency, structural abnormalities, inadequate antioxidant defenses, and a chest wall that is more compliant than the lung. In addition, non-pulmonary issues may adversely affect lung development, including systemic infections and insufficient nutrition. Once BPD has developed, its management focuses on providing adequate gas exchange while promoting optimal lung growth. Pharmacologic strategies to ameliorate or prevent BPD continue to be investigated. A variety of agents, to be reviewed henceforth, have been developed or re-purposed to target different points in the pathways that lead to BPD, including anti-inflammatories, diuretics, steroids, pulmonary vasodilators, antioxidants, and a number of molecules involved in the cell signaling cascade thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of BPD.

A comparison of LISA versus InSurE: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Less invasive surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) methods have been linked to better respiratory outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to determine if Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) altered the rate of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants. Secondary objectives were to determine if LISA compared to Intubation Surfactant Extubation (InSurE) resulted in different respiratory outcomes and hospital course.

METHODS

In this retrospective chart review, outcomes were compared in two preterm infant groups (25-32 weeks gestation). Infants in Group 1 received surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) via InSurE method, while infants in Group 2 received SRT via LISA method.

RESULTS

Regardless of SRT method utilized, there were no significant differences in rates of BPD between the two groups in infants born at 25-32 weeks gestation (30.6% vs 33.3%; P = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite using LISA method rather than InSurE for SRT, premature infants continue to be at high risk for BPD. LISA shows promise as a safe, noninvasive SRT alternative to invasive methods like InSurE.

Clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA)

BACKGROUND

Less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is increasingly used. We investigated the feasibility of a new LISA-device (Neofact®) in neonates.

DESIGN

Prospective observational pilot study with open-label LISA in two tertiary neonatal intensive care units.

PATIENTS

20 infants with a gestational age of ≥26+0/7 weeks and an indication for LISA (Respiratory Severity Score (RSS)≥5 or fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) ≥0.30). Infants with respiratory tract malformations or unavailability of an instructed neonatologist were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Success of LISA, defined as laryngoscopy-confirmed intratracheal catheter position or a decrease in FiO₂ by ≥0.05 or to 0.21, accompanied by an RSS decrease of ≥2; number of attempts needed for tracheal catheterisation.

RESULTS

20/57 screened infants were enrolled. Successful application occurred in 19/20 (95%). One application failed after three attempts. No device-related adverse events occurred. The median number of attempts was 2, success rate per attempt 19/31 (61%).

CONCLUSION

LISA via Neofact® appears feasible.

A systematic review of reports of quality improvement for bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is the most common morbidity of preterm infants, and its incidence has not responded to research and intervention efforts to the same degree as other major morbidities associated with prematurity. The complexity of neonatal respiratory care as well as persistent inter-institutional variability in BPD rates suggest that BPD may be amenable to quality improvement (QI) efforts. We present a systematic review of QI for BPD in preterm infants. We identified 22 reports from single centers and seven from collaborative efforts published over the past two decades. In almost all of the reports, respiratory QI interventions successfully reduced BPD or other key respiratory measures, particularly for infants with birth weight over 1000 g. Several themes and lessons from existing reports may help inform future efforts in both research and QI to impact the burden of BPD.

Less-Invasive Surfactant Administration for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Consensus Guideline

INTRODUCTION

Less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is a method of surfactant delivery to preterm infants for treating respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), which can reduce the composite risk of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia and the time on mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of studies published up to April 2021 on minimally invasive catheter surfactant delivery in preterm infants with RDS was conducted. Based on these studies, with parental feedback sought via an online questionnaire, 9 UK-based specialists in neonatal respiratory disease developed their consensus for implementing LISA. Recommendations were developed following a modified, iterative Delphi process using a questionnaire employing a 9-point Likert scale and an a priori level of agreement/disagreement.

RESULTS

Successful implementation of LISA can be achieved by training the multidisciplinary team and following locally agreed guidance. From the time of the decision to administer surfactant, LISA should take <30 min. The comfort of the baby and requirements to maintain non-invasive respiratory support are important. While many infants can be managed without requiring additional sedation/analgesia, fentanyl along with atropine may be considered. Parents should be provided with sufficient information about medication side effects and involved in treatment discussions.

CONCLUSION

LISA has the potential to improve outcomes for preterm infants with RDS and can be introduced as a safe and effective part of UK-based neonatal care with appropriate training.

To Sedate or Not to Sedate for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration: An Ethical Approach

Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is an effective, minimally invasive technique of administering surfactant to infants with respiratory distress syndrome. While termed less invasive, LISA still requires airway instrumentation with direct laryngoscopy, thus may be considered painful. However, the issue of whether or not to routinely sedate infants for LISA remains contentious, with significant variation in practice between centres. Proponents for giving pharmacological analgesia and/or sedation predominantly focus on patient comfort during the procedure. However, those who favour non-pharmacological measures of pain management focus on the potential for procedural success without the risk of adverse events, such as respiratory depression and potentially the need for escalation to intubation, which may occur with pharmacological agents. The neonatal population who may benefit from LISA is varied. Due to this variety in presentation type, gestational age, and unit experience, there is a need to provide an individualized, tailored approach to sedation and analgesia for these infants. Using a blanket approach to sedation will lead to infants being exposed to sedative medications on the assumption of potential distress, rather than in response to signs of actual distress. This places the infant at risk of the adverse reactions, potentially without them ever having needed the beneficial effect of the medications. This seems an unnecessary risk. This article explores the ethical arguments pertaining to analgesia and sedation during the LISA technique, concluding that a standardized approach to the usage of pharmacological sedation is undesirable. Moreover, we maintain that procedural analgesia and sedation should be based on individualized, infant-centred assessment, rather than on a rigid, standardized approach.

Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy: An Analytical Report of Our Prospective Dubai Cohort

Introduction: Type 2 pneumocytes of the respiratory epithelium secrete the endogenous surfactant, a detergent-like substance that lines the alveolar sacs of the lungs. The surfactant facilitates the gas exchange process across the alveolar membrane by preventing the collapse of the alveoli and thereby maintaining their distended state. Respiratory distress syndrome of the premature neonates is characterized by quantitative and/or qualitative defects of endogenous surfactant metabolic pathways. The advent of exogenous surfactant therapy is rightly hailed as the major milestone in advancement of the care of the babies with surfactant-deficient lung disease. The administration of exogenous surfactant traditionally involves endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) is the technique of delivering surfactant without intubation whilst continuing the baby on noninvasive respiratory support. This author introduced MIST as the default way of administering surfactant in his neonatal units in Dubai and has to his credit the first published report on MIST from the United Arab Emirates in this journal in 2018. 

Objective: To analyze prospectively all our babies in Dubai who received surfactant by MIST.

Design: Prospective descriptive study of all babies receiving surfactant by MIST starting from January 2018.

Setting: Three tertiary care neonatal centers in Dubai.

Patients and methods: Thirteen babies (gestation 27-36 weeks and birth weight 0.95-2.81 kg) were treated with MIST on 15 occasions. Catheterization techniques were by infant feeding tube in 10 babies, LISA (less invasive surfactant administration) catheter in one baby, and 2.0 size endotracheal tube (ETT) with surfactant filled syringe directly attached to its hub two times each in two babies. Curosurf the porcine surfactant at 200 mg/kg was used on nine occasions and Survanta the bovine surfactant at 4 mL/kg on six occasions.

Main outcome measures: MIST success defined as the baby not needing intubation and ventilation within 72 hours post MIST. Outcome measures with respect to the different modalities of MIST procedure and surfactant preparations used in this prospective cohort.

Results: Only one of the 13 babies (7.7%) in this cohort needed escalation of support with mechanical ventilation and high frequency oscillation (HFO). MIST using semi-rigid catheters like the LISA catheter or the smallest size ETT was technically easier to perform. No differences were observed with regard to the surfactant preparation used. None had an abnormal neurosonogram and there were no instances of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis either. The baby that had an unsuccessful MIST had retinopathy of prematurity that was effectively treated with Laser post discharge from neonatal unit. All the babies in this cohort had age appropriate developmental milestones on subsequent follow up visits ranging from three months to two years.

Conclusions: MIST can be easily mastered and adapted in our neonatal units. MIST by any of the three variations of techniques as described in our cohort at FiO2 thresholds not exceeding 0.4 results in quicker resolution of the surfactant deficient lung disease, reduces the oxygen days in these babies and perhaps thereby insures intact survival of these babies.