Hepatitis C virus-HIV-coinfected patients and liver transplantation

Current status of liver transplantation for human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in mainland China

According to the report from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection exceeded 1.2 million individuals by the year 2022, with an annual increase of about 80000 cases. The overall prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen among individuals co-infected with HIV reached 13.7%, almost twice the rate of the general population in China. In addition to the well-documented susceptibility to opportunistic infections and new malignancies, HIV infected patients frequently experience liver-related organ damage, with the liver and kidneys being the most commonly affected. This often leads to the development of end-stage liver and kidney diseases. Therefore, organ transplantation has emerged as an important part of active treatment for HIV infected patients. However, the curative effect is not satisfactory. HIV infection has been considered a contraindication for organ transplantation. Until the emergence of highly active anti-retroviral therapy in 1996, the once intractable replication of retrovirus was effectively inhibited. With prolonged survival, the failure of important organs has become the main cause of death among HIV patients. Therefore, transplant centers worldwide have resumed exploration of organ transplantation for HIV-infected individuals and reached a positive conclusion. This study provides an overview of the current landscape of HIV-positive patients receiving liver transplantation (LT) in mainland China. To date, our transplant center has conducted LT for eight end-stage liver disease patients co-infected with HIV, and all but one, who died two months postoperatively due to sepsis and progressive multi-organ failure, have survived. Comparative analysis with hepatitis B virus-infected patients during the same period revealed no statistically significant differences in acute rejection reactions, cytomegalovirus infection, bacteremia, pulmonary infections, acute kidney injury, new-onset cancers, or vascular and biliary complications.

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

Pharmacotherapeutic Interventions in People Living With HIV Undergoing Solid Organ Transplantation: A Scoping Review

The pharmacotherapeutic management of people living with HIV (PLWHIV) undergoing solid organ transplantation (SOT) is clinically challenging, mainly due to the frequent occurrence of complex drug-drug interactions. Although various strategies have been proposed to improve treatment outcomes in these patients, several uncertainties remain, and consensus practice guidelines are just beginning to emerge. The main objective of this scoping review was to map the extent of the literature on the pharmacotherapeutic interventions performed by healthcare professionals for PLWHIV undergoing SOT.

Methods

We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane databases as well as gray literature for articles published between January 2010 and February 2020. Study selection was performed by at least 2 independent reviewers. Articles describing pharmacotherapeutic interventions in PLWHIV considered for or undergoing SOT were included in the study.

Results

Of the 12 599 references identified through our search strategy, 209 articles met the inclusion criteria. Results showed that the vast majority of reported pharmacotherapeutic interventions concerned the management of immunosuppressive and antimicrobial therapy, including antiretrovirals. Analysis of the data demonstrated that for several aspects of the pharmacotherapeutic management of PLWHIV undergoing SOT, there were differing practices, such as the choice of immunosuppressive induction and maintenance therapy. Other important aspects of patient management, such as patient counseling, were rarely reported.

Conclusions

Our results constitute an extensive overview of current practices in the pharmacotherapeutic management of SOT in PLWHIV and identify knowledge gaps that should be addressed to help improve patient care in this specific population.

Changing Landscape of Liver Transplantation in the Post-DAA and Contemporary ART Era

Combination anti-retroviral therapy has drastically improved solid organ transplantation outcomes in persons living with HIV. DAA therapy has led to the successful eradication of HCV. While recent data have suggested improvement in outcomes in HIV/HCV-coinfected liver transplant recipients, temporal trends in patient survival within pre- and post-DAA eras are yet to be elucidated. The UNOS database was utilized to identify deceased donor liver transplant recipients between 1 January 2000 and 30 September 2020 and stratify them by HIV and HCV infection status. A total of 85,730 patients met the inclusion criteria. One-year and five-year patient survival improved (93% and 80%, respectively) for all transplants performed post-2015. For HIV/HCV-coinfected recipients, survival improved significantly from 78% (pre-2015) to 92% (post-2015). Multivariate regression analyses identified advanced recipient age, Black race, diabetes mellitus and decompensated cirrhosis as risk factors associated with higher one-year mortality. Liver transplant outcomes in HIV/HCV-coinfected liver transplant recipients have significantly improved over the last quinquennium in the setting of the highly effective combination of ART and DAA therapy. The presence of HIV, HCV, HIV/HCV-coinfection and active HCV viremia at the time of transplant do not cause higher mortality risk in liver transplant recipients in the current era.

Liver Transplantation for HCC in HIV-Infected Patients: Long-Term Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

HIV-infected patients now have long life expectation since the introduction of the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Liver diseases, especially cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), currently represent a leading cause of death in this setting of patients.

AIM

To address the results of liver transplantation (LT) for HCC in HIV-infected patients.

METHODS

All patients with and without HIV infection who underwent LT for HCC (n = 420) between 2001 and 2021 in our center were analyzed with the intent of comparing graft and patient survival. Cox regression analysis was used to determine prognostic survival factors and logistic regression to determine the predictor factors of post-LT recurrence.

RESULTS

Among 1010 LT, 32 were HIV-infected recipients. With an average follow-up of 62 ± 51 months, 5-year overall survival in LT recipients with and without HIV-infection was 71.6% and 69.9%, respectively (p = ns), whereas 5-year graft survival in HIV-infected and HIV-non infected was 68.3% and 68.2%, respectively (p = ns). The independent predictive factor of survival in the study group was: HCV infection (HR 1.83, p = 0.024). There were no significant differences in the pathological characteristics of HCC between the two groups. The logistic regression analysis of the study population demonstrated that microvascular invasion (HR 5.18, p< 0.001), HCC diameter (HR 1.16, p = 0.028), and number of HCC nodules (HR 1.26, p = 0.003) were predictors of recurrence post-LT.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that HIV patients undergoing LT for HCC have comparable results in terms of post-LT survival. Excellent results can be achieved for HIV-infected patients with HCC, as long as a strategy of close surveillance and precise treatment of the tumor is adopted while on the waiting list.

miRNA expression profiles in liver grafts of HCV and HIV/HCV-infected recipients, 6 months after liver transplantation

In hepatitis C virus (HCV)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co‐infected patients, HIV enhances HCV replication and liver damage. Several microRNAs (miRNAs), active in pro‐fibrotic and inflammatory pathways, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of this phenomenon. However, these miRNAs have been tested only in explanted cirrhotic livers, when the liver damage has become chronic and irreversible. No data are available on the early phase of viral infection, such as early after liver transplantation (LT). In the present study, the expression of miR‐101, miR‐122, miR‐155, miR‐192, miR‐200c, miR‐338, and miR‐532 was determined by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction in liver biopsies of HCV (n = 19) and HCV/HIV‐infected (n = 20) LT recipients, as well as in a control group (n = 18) of noninfected patients, transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis. The timing of liver biopsy was 6 months post‐LT. None of the patients was treated with direct‐acting anti‐HCV drugs. All co‐infected recipients had suppressed HIV viral load. Grading and staging were assessed according to the Ishak Classification. HCV and HIV viral load were measured in the sera. miR‐101 (p = .03), miR‐122 (p = .012), and miR‐192 (p = .038) were significantly downregulated in HCV/HIV co‐infected and HCV mono‐infected recipients when compared with noninfected recipients, and such downregulation was more pronounced in co‐infected ones. Moreover, in co‐infected recipients but not in mono‐infected ones, miR‐101 inversely correlated with the peripheral HCV‐RNA levels (r = .41, p = .04) and miR‐122 inversely correlated with peripheral HCV‐RNA levels (r = .49, p = .03) and with the histological grading (r = .51, p = .02).  In conclusion, as early as 6 months after LT, the presence of HIV‐HCV co‐infection enhanced a significant downregulation of certain miRNAs that showed a direct correlation with HCV viral load and liver inflammation.

Oxidative stress in hepatitis C virus-human immunodeficiency virus co-infected patients

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection generates sustained inflammation with increased reactive oxygen species production. The pathogenic impact of systemic oxidative stress is known to influence drug treatment and follow-up. The aim of this case-control study was to compare the redox status in HCV-HIV co-infected with respect to HIV-infected individuals and to explore the relation between redox and HIV follow-up variables.

PATIENTS OR MATERIALS AND METHODS

Blood samples were drawn from 330 individuals divided into three groups: HIV, HCV-HIV and presumable healthy subjects. Redox, hematological, hemochemical, immunologic and virological indexes were determined.

RESULTS

Both HIV groups had significant differences in global indexes of damage and antioxidant status (p<0.05) with respect to the supposedly healthy individual group. HCV-HIV group showed a significantly higher damage (total hydroperoxide and advanced oxidation protein products) compared to the control and HIV groups (p<0.05). The overall modification of the redox indexes showed that 72% of individuals with simultaneous detrimental differences were related to HCV-HIV condition.

CONCLUSIONS

These results corroborate that oxidative stress occurs in the HIV condition and also during HCV-HIV co-infection, with different molecular changes of follow-up indexes. Redox indexes diagnosis should be considered in early diagnosis and treatment of HCV-HIV co-infection.

Dolutegravir-Based Antiretroviral Regimens for HIV Liver Transplant Patients in Real-Life Settings

Background and Objectives

Liver transplantation is now considered a safe procedure in patients with HIV because of the advent of potent antiretroviral therapies (ART).

Objective

We aimed to describe the use of dolutegravir-based maintenance ART in patients with HIV and liver transplant regularly followed in our hospital.

Methods

We searched the database of our Department of Infectious Diseases for liver transplant recipients receiving calcineurin inhibitor-based maintenance immunosuppression concomitantly treated with dolutegravir for at least 1 month.

Results

Ten HIV-positive liver transplant recipients were identified. At 4.6 ± 3.5 years post-transplant, all the patients were switched to dolutegravir-based therapies for treatment simplification. However, at 1 year after the switch, five of the ten patients returned to their previous ART regimens because of increased serum transaminases (n = 1), reversible increased serum creatinine (n = 4), repeated episodes of nausea/vomiting (n = 1) and variable out-of-range concentrations of tacrolimus or cyclosporine (n = 2). However, it should be recognized that these events cannot be unequivocally ascribed to dolutegravir and, in the case of increased serum creatinine, are predictable.

Conclusions

The management of HIV-positive liver transplant recipients in clinical practice is a complex task, where possibility of simplifying antiretroviral regimens must be balanced with the need to guarantee optimal immunosuppression and the finest treatment tolerability. A multidisciplinary approach involving physicians and clinical pharmacologists/pharmacists could help achieve this goal.

Early post-liver transplant surgical morbidity in HIV-infected recipients: risk factor for overall survival? A nationwide retrospective study

The aim of the study was to analyse the risk factors for early surgical complications requiring relaparotomy and the related impact on overall survival (OS) in HIV-infected patients submitted to liver transplantation. Thus a retrospective investigation was conducted on a nationwide multicentre cohort of 157 HIV patients submitted to liver transplantation in six Italian Transplant Units between 2004 and 2014. An early relaparotomy was performed in 24.8% of cases and the underlying clinical causes were biliary leak (8.2%), bleeding (8.2%), intestinal perforation (4.5%) and suspect of vascular complications(3.8%). No differences in terms of prevalence for either overall or cause-specific early relaparotomies were noted when compared with a non-HIV control group, matched for MELD, recipient age, HCV-RNA positivity and HBV prevalence. While in the control group an early relaparotomy appeared a negative prognostic factor, such impact on OS was not noted in HIV recipients. Nonetheless increasing number of relaparotomies were associated with decreased survival. In multivariate analysis, preoperative refractory ascites and Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy reconstruction were significant risk factors for early relaparotomy. To conclude, in HIV liver transplanted patients, an increasing number of early relaparotomies because of surgical complications does negatively affect the OS. Preoperative refractory ascites reflecting a severe portal hypertension and a difficult biliary tract reconstruction requiring a Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy are associated with increased risk of early relaparotomy.

Immunological profiles of HIV-positive recipients of liver transplant

BACKGROUND

Scarce data are available about immune cell frequencies in HIV-positive recipients of liver transplant. Alterations in immune subsets can lead to persistent immune activation and disease progression or reduced HIV-specific responses. In liver transplantation, impaired immune tolerance can lead to organ rejection.

METHODS

HIV-positive subjects with undetectable HIVRNA and CD4 > 100/mm³ were included. Control groups were non-transplanted HIV-positive patients with similar immunovirological parameters and healthy subjects. B cells (memory, transitional, and mature subsets), T cells (effector TH1, nonclassic TH1, TH17, TH1/17; T regulatory naïve and effector subsets and CD8⁺ T regulatory cells), and NK cells (CD56^dim and CD56^bright subsets) were analyzed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients, including 14 HIV-positive transplant recipients (HIV-LT), 14 HIV-positive controls, and 28 healthy controls were included. Median age of HIV-LT patients was 54.9 years with median time from transplant of 7.6 years. Eleven (79%) were HIV/HCV coinfected. Compared to nontransplanted patients, HIV-LT displayed significantly increased frequency of T CD8⁺ cells, lower percentage of T CD4+ cell, and lower number of nonclassic TH1, TH1/17 cells and naïve T CD4⁺ regulatory cells (Tregs). Healthy controls showed increased numbers of B cell subsets and decreased percentage of T effector subpopulations compared to HIV-LT. Compared to HIV-positive patients, healthy controls had higher B cells, NK cells, CD4⁺ T cells, naïve CD4+ Tregs but lower CD8⁺ T cells, effector Tregs, CD8⁺ Tregs, and all T effector cell subsets.

CONCLUSIONS

Immune cell subpopulations potentially associated with HIV progression and organ rejection were detected in HIV-positive transplant recipients. We confirmed altered frequencies of B, T, and NK cell populations in HIV-positive liver transplant recipients compared to healthy controls. The imbalance among immune cell subsets deserves further studies to identify markers of transplant outcome and potential therapeutic targets.

ELITA consensus statements on the use of DAAs in liver transplant candidates and recipients

The advent of safe and highly effective direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has had huge implications for the hepatitis C virus (HCV) transplant field, and changed our management of both patients on the waiting list and those with HCV graft re-infection after liver transplantation (LT). When treating HCV infection before LT, HCV re-infection of the graft can be prevented in nearly all patients. In addition, some candidates show a remarkable clinical improvement and may be delisted. Alternatively, HCV infection can be treated post-LT either soon after the transplant, taking advantage of the removal of the infected native liver, or at the time of disease recurrence, as was carried out in the past. In either case, some DAAs have a limited use because of their drug to drug interactions with various immunosuppressants as well as the many other drugs liver transplant recipients are often prescribed. In addition, some DAAs should be avoided in case of severe renal failure, which is not an unusual complication after LT. The present document provides a series of consensus statements on the LT issues that have not been extensively addressed previously. These statements have been developed to support physicians and other stakeholders in charge of LT candidates and recipients when deciding to treat HCV, especially in difficult situations.

Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in real-world patients with HIV-HCV coinfection and advanced liver disease

BACKGROUND

HIV-HCV-coinfected patients respond just as well to modern direct-acting antiviral HCV therapy as HCV-monoinfected patients. However, clinical data for all-oral HCV treatments are sparse in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients with an advanced stage of liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

A subanalysis of efficacy and safety for a daclatasvir (DCV) and sofosbuvir (SOF) regimen, with or without ribavirin (RBV), was undertaken in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients with advanced liver disease and no other treatment options enrolled into a European DCV compassionate use programme.

RESULTS

Fifty five HIV-HCV (mostly genotypes 1, 3, 4) coinfected patients were treated with DCV+SOF with (n=16) or without RBV (n=39), mostly for 24 weeks. Patients were predominantly (95%) cirrhotic (50% were Child-Pugh class B or C) and were receiving a wide range of antiretrovirals; 40% were injection drug users and 25% were receiving oral opioid substitution. Sustained virological response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) by modified intention-to-treat analysis (n=52) was 92% overall (95% CI 81.5, 97.9), and was similar with (94% [95% CI 69.8, 99.8]) or without RBV (92% [95% CI 77.5, 98.2]). Only one patient relapsed (Child-Pugh class B). The overall SVR12 rate after excluding non-virological failures (n=49) was 98% (95% CI 89.1, 99.9). Four patients discontinued treatment for adverse events and one died during treatment (not treatment-related). No patient lost opioid maintenance or required a change of antiretrovirals due to drug-drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

DCV+SOF, with or without RBV, showed high SVR12 rates and was well tolerated in this real-world cohort of HIV-HCV-coinfected patients with very advanced liver disease. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02097966 (Study AI444-237).

Liver involvement in human immunodeficiency virus infection

The advances in management of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) with highly effective anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) have resulted in increased longevity of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. AIDS-related illnesses now account for less than 50 % of the deaths, and liver diseases have emerged as the leading cause of death in patients with HIV infection. Chronic viral hepatitis, drug-related hepatotoxicity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and opportunistic infections are the common liver diseases that are seen in HIV-infected individuals. Because of the shared routes of transmission, co-infections with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are very common in HIV-infected persons. Hepatitis C is the most common viral hepatitis seen in HIV-infected patients. With the availability of directly acting agents, treatment outcome of HCV is comparable to that seen in non HIV-infected patients. Careful monitoring is required for drug interactions and drug-induced hepatotoxicity and modification of drugs should be done where necessary. The results of liver transplantation in select HIV-infected patients can be comparable with those of HIV-negative patients.

Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) Guidance for Antiviral Therapy Against HCV Infection: Update 2016

India contributes significantly to the global burden of HCV. While the nucleoside NS5B inhibitor sofosbuvir became available in the Indian market in March 2015, the other directly acting agents (DAAs), Ledipasvir and Daclatasvir, have only recently become available in the India. The introduction of these DAA in India at a relatively affordable price has led to great optimism about prospects of cure for these patients as not only will they provide higher efficacy, but combination DAAs as all-oral regimen will result in lower side effects than were seen with pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin therapy. Availability of these newer DAAs has necessitated revision of INASL guidelines for the treatment of HCV published in 2015. Current considerations for the treatment of HCV in India include the poorer response of genotype 3, nonavailability of many of the DAAs recommended by other guidelines and the cost of therapy. The availability of combination DAA therapy has simplified therapy of HCV with decreased reliance of evaluation for monitoring viral kinetics or drug related side effects.

Evaluation of hepatic vascular endothelial injury during liver storage by molecular detection and targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging

We hypothesized that lack of the high-energy phosphates during liver storage may potentially cause persistent injury to the vascular endothelium. Biopsies were obtained from livers obtained from beating heart human donors, stored either in the standard storage solution, that is, University of Wisconsin solution (UWS) or Celsior, and examined for various markers related to progressive endothelial injury. The expression of P2Y1 receptor, the major signal transduction machinery for adenosine triphosphate/adenosine diphosphate, decreased in hepatic vascular endothelial cells over time. Despite unaltered endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) levels, serine1177-phosphorylated eNOS, the active form of eNOS, progressively decreased with time. The production of nitric oxide enzyme decreased with time when liver tissues were examined in vitro. This also coincided with decreased interaction of eNOS with actin nucleating proteins like myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate and Rac1, which plays a role in modulating the cytoskeleton and helps position eNOS in a favorable cytosolic position for active enzymatic activity. Conversely, the interaction of eNOS with caveolin1 was significantly increased 6 H after ex vivo storage. Finally, we demonstrated by targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasound that membrane-bound vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in the hepatic vascular endothelial cell increased after 6 H of ex vivo storage. Overall, the results of this study provide evidence of a progressive hepatic vascular endothelial injury during the ex vivo storage. This may be a causative factor for ischemic cholangiopathy and delayed graft function post liver transplantation. © 2015 IUBMB Life, 68(1):51-57, 2015.