Surgery of pancreas transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2017;22:389-397. [PMID: 28682797 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000434]

Technology and Transplants: Troubleshooting Insulin Pumps and Pancreas Transplants in the Emergency Department

Diabetes management has continued to evolve with new treatments and technology. This article discusses the approach to evaluation and management of two distinctive subsets of patients: (1) patients who manage their diabetes with an insulin pump (artificial pancreas) and (2) patients who have received a pancreas transplant. The most current literature is reviewed and pearls and pitfalls distinctive to these two patient populations are discussed. Relevant diagnostics are reviewed with emphasis on recognition of complications faced in the emergency department management of these unique patient populations.

Improved surgical outcomes following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in the contemporary era

BACKGROUND

Complications leading to early technical failure have been the Achilles' heel of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT). The study purpose was to analyze longitudinally our experience with early surgical complications following SPKT with an emphasis on changes in practice that improved outcomes in the most recent era.

STUDY DESIGN

Single center retrospective review of all SPKTs from 11/1/01 to 8/12/20 with enteric drainage. Early relaparotomy was defined as occurring within 3 months of SPKT. Patients were stratified into two sequential eras: Era 1 (E1): 11/1/01-5/30/13; Era 2 (E2) 6/1/13-8/12/20 based on changes in practice that occurred pursuant to donor age and pancreas cold ischemia time (CIT).

RESULTS

255 consecutive SPKTs were analyzed (E1, n = 165; E2, n = 90). E1 patients received organs from older donors (mean E1 27.3 vs. E2 23.1 years) with longer pancreas cold CITs) (mean E1 16.1 vs. E2 13.3 h, both p < .05). E1 patients had a higher early relaparotomy rate (E1 43.0% vs. E2 14.4%) and were more likely to require allograft pancreatectomy (E1 9.1% vs. E2 2.2%, both p < .05). E2 patients underwent systemic venous drainage more frequently (E1 8% vs. E2 29%) but pancreas venous drainage did not influence either relaparotomy or allograft pancreatectomy rates. The most common indications for early relaparotomy in E1 were allograft thrombosis (11.5%) and peri-pancreatic phlegmon/abscess (8.5%) whereas in E2 were thrombosis, pancreatitis/infection, and bowel obstruction (each 3%).

CONCLUSION

Maximizing donor quality (younger donors) and minimizing pancreas CIT are paramount for reducing early surgical complications following SPKT.

Short- and Long-Term Intestinal Complications After Combined Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation is the treatment of choice in patients with type 1 diabetes and end-stage renal disease, because it improves survival and quality of life. Currently, enteric exocrine drainage is the most commonly used method. Intestinal complications continue to be a major cause of posttransplant morbidity despite improvements in surgical technique. This study analyzed early and late intestinal complications related to SPK transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 100 adult patients undergoing SPK transplantation between January 2009 and December 2019. We performed systemic venous drainage and exocrine enteric drainage with duodenojejunostomy. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v2. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Istanbul and the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

RESULTS

Intestinal complications were reported in 18 patients. Ten patients (10%) had the following early intestinal complications including: ileus (n = 4), intestinal obstruction (n = 2), graft volvulus (n = 1), duodenal graft fistula (n = 1), and jejunal fistula after pancreas transplantation (n = 1). Two cases required relaparotomy: graft repositioning with Roux-en-Y conversion (n = 1) and Y-roux conversion (n = 1). Eight patients had repeated episodes of intestinal obstruction (8%), of whom 2 required surgery for resolution with 100% postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

SPK transplantation with enteric drainage via duodenojejunostomy has a low rate of short- and long-term postoperative intestinal complications. Surgery in patients with recurrent intestinal obstruction has a high mortality risk and should be performed in reference transplant centers.

Side-to-Side Duodenojejunal Anastomosis Volvulus After Pancreas Transplant: A Case Report

Pancreas transplant is one of the known most effective treatments for type 1 diabetes mellitus and is associated with improved survival and quality of life for patients. Most centers use a direct side-to-side anastomosis between the donor's duodenum and jejunum, and we describe a rare complication that affected 2 patients. The 2 patients each received a simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant and presented with side-to-side duodenojejunal anastomosis volvulus. We describe the clinical and radiological presentations and then propose an effective management method. Side-to-side duodenojejunal anastomosis volvulus after pancreas transplant is an exceptional complication, and there are special radiological and surgical manage-ment techniques to allow efficient treatment.

Technical factors that minimize the occurrence of early graft failure in pancreas transplantation

Pancreatic transplantation is the only treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes resulting in long-term euglycemia without exogenous insulin. However, pancreatic transplantation has become debatable following the improvements in the results of islet transplantation and artificial pancreas. Therefore, surgeons who perform pancreas transplants require the best surgical technique that can minimize technical failure. We aimed to report our experiences with pancreatic transplantations. We transplanted 65 pancreatic grafts between 2015 and 2020. Except for one death due to hypoxic brain damage after surgery, no postoperative technical failure was observed. We usually perform duodeno-duodenal anastomosis using the transperitoneal approach, with retrocolic placement of the graft pancreas. There was no leakage from the duodenum even after immunologic graft failure. To prevent venous thrombosis, which is the most common cause of technical failure, we used the inferior vena cava for anastomosis and added graft venoplasty with a patch of donor vena cava or aortic interposition graft to the bench procedure; subsequently, there were no cases of technical failure due to thrombosis post-transplantation. Therefore, the 1-year graft survival (insulin-free) rate was more than 95%. The improving the surgical technique will maintain pancreatic transplantation as the best treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Pancreas transplant with enteric drainage at a single institute in Asia

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

This study is to assess immunological and graft survival outcomes after pancreas transplant at a single institute in Asia.

METHODS

Patients undergoing pancreas transplant with enteric drainage were included. Clinical data and outcomes were evaluated and compared between each subgroup.

RESULTS

There were 165 cases of pancreas transplant, including 38 (23 %) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK), 24 (15 %) pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK), 75 (46 %) pancreas transplant alone (PTA), and 28 (17 %) pancreas before kidney transplant (PBK). The overall surgical complication rate was 46.1 %, with highest (62.5 %) in PAK and lowest (32.0 %) in PTA, P = 0.008. The late complications included 32.7 % infection and 3.6 % malignancy. Overall rejection of pancreas graft was 24.8 % including 18.2 % acute and 9.7 % chronic rejection. Rejection was highest in PTA group (36.0 %) and lowest in PBK (3.6 %). There were 56 cases (33.9 %) with graft loss in total, with highest graft loss rate in PTA (38.7 %). The 1-year, 5-year and 10-year pancreas graft survivals for total patients were 98.0 %, 87.7 % and 70.9 % respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Enteric drainage in pancreas transplant could be applied safely not only in SPK but also in other subgroups. Enteric drainage itself would not compromise the immunological and graft survival outcomes.

Evidence for Roux-en-Y Pancreatic Duct Drainage Versus Standard Anastomosis in Pancreatic Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic transplantation is usually performed simultaneously with renal transplantation in the setting of end-stage nephropathy and type 1 diabetes. Surgical methods for dealing with exocrine secretions include bladder drainage, direct duodenojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y (ReY) enteric drainage. Roux-en-Y may confer an advantage over duodenojejunostomy because it distances enteric content from the transplant duodenal anastomosis. We examined the effect of enteric drainage method on transplant outcomes.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the UK transplant registry on 2172 consecutive pancreatic transplants. Early graft loss was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included return to theater, length of inpatient stay, readmission with pancreatitis, graft survival, and patient survival.

RESULTS

There was no protective effect of ReY drainage (early graft loss, 4.6% vs 3.1%, P = 0.30; hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.52; P = 0.91). There was a significant association between ReY and return to theater, reflecting either the technique or indication for ReY (multivariate odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-3.06; P < 0.01). The effect of transplant center on graft survival was assessed and adjusted for.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of a protective benefit of ReY drainage over duodenojejunostomy, but there was an increased risk of return to theater.

Insulin secretion and action after pancreas transplantation. A retrospective single-center study

We explored glucometabolic and renal function after engraftment in all 159 consecutive patients with type 1 diabetes who received pancreas transplantation alone (PTA, n = 80) or simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK, n = 79) in Norway from 2012 until 2017. We report fasting levels of plasma glucose (FPG), C-peptide, eGFR and the homeostasis model assessment of insulin sensitivity (HOMA2(%S)) and beta-cell function (HOMA2(%B)) measured one to three times weekly during the first 8 and at 52 weeks after transplantation. One year after engraftment, in the PTA and SPK groups 52 and 64 were normoglycaemic without exogenous insulin, and two and zero patients were dead. Data at the 52-week visit were missing for 5 and 6 patients in the respective groups. During the first 8 weeks, FPG was lower, C-peptide and HOMA2(%S) were higher and eGFR was lower in the SPK group as compared with the PTA group (all p < .05). 30 out of 157 living patients needed insulin treatment 52 weeks after transplantation, 9/79 in the SPK group and 21/78 in the PTA group (p = .02). In conclusion, patients who underwent SPK showed lower insulin sensitivity, but higher insulin secretory capacity and lower mean blood glucose levels the first 8 weeks after transplantation. Also, a higher proportion of patients in the SPK group were insulin-free after 1 year, compared with the PTA group.

CT fluoroscopy-guided pancreas transplant biopsies: a retrospective evaluation of predictors of complications and success rates

To identify predictors of biopsy success and complications in CT-guided pancreas transplant (PTX) core biopsy. We retrospectively identified all CT fluoroscopy-guided PTX biopsies performed at our institution (2000-2017) and included 187 biopsies in 99 patients. Potential predictors related to patient characteristics (age, gender, body mass index (BMI), PTX age, PTX volume) and procedure characteristics (biopsy depth, needle size, access path, number of samples, interventionalist's experience) were correlated with biopsy success (sufficient tissue for histologic diagnosis) and the occurrence of complications. Biopsy success (72.2%) was more likely to be obtained in men [+25.3% (10.9, 39.7)] and when the intervention was performed by an experienced interventionalist [+27.2% (8.1, 46.2)]. Complications (5.9%) occurred more frequently in patients with higher PTX age [OR: 1.014 (1.002, 1.026)] and when many (3-4) tissue samples were obtained [+8.7% (-2.3, 19.7)]. Multivariable regression analysis confirmed male gender [OR: 3.741 (1.736, 8.059)] and high experience [OR: 2.923 (1.255, 6.808)] (biopsy success) as well as older PTX age [OR: 1.019 (1.002, 1.035)] and obtaining many samples [OR: 4.880 (1.240, 19.203)] (complications) as independent predictors. Our results suggest that CT-guided PTX biopsy should be performed by an experienced interventionalist to achieve higher success rates, and not more than two tissue samples should be obtained to reduce complications. Caution is in order in patients with older transplants because of higher complication rates.

Back-table surgery pancreas allograft for transplantation: Implications in complications

To describe the main aspects of back-table surgery in pancreatic graft and the problems arising from poor technique. Back-table surgery for pancreatic graft is a complex, meticulous and laborious technique on which the success of implant surgery and perioperative results depends. The technique can be described in the following steps: Preparation of the sterile table, ex-situ inspection of the pancreas-spleen block, management of the duodenum, identification of the bile duct, preparation of the portal vein, preparation of the own graft arteries and anastomosis to the arterial graft, spleen management and graft preservation prior to implantation in the recipient. A careful inspection of the pancreas-spleen block should be performed. It is important to identify the stump of the main bile duct, the portal vein cuff, and the arrangement of the superior mesenteric artery and splenic artery. The redundant duodenum must be removed. The availability of a good venous cuff facilitates the portal vein anastomosis and the positioning of the graft, two key points to prevent thrombosis. The section line of the arteries must be clean, without atherosclerosis, to prevent arterial thrombosis. The superior and splenic mesenteric arteries are generally separated by dense fibrolymphatic tissue. The artery can be reconstructed by interposing a "Y" graft from the donor iliac artery; or with an end-to-end anastomosis between the splenic artery and the superior mesenteric artery. An exquisite technique of bench work helps to prevent the most feared complications of pancreas transplantation: Thrombosis and graft pancreatitis.

Exocrine drainage in pancreas transplantation: Complications and management

The aim of this minireview is to compare various pancreas transplantation exocrine drainage techniques i.e., bladder vs enteric. Both techniques have different difficulties and complications. Numerous comparisons have been made in the literature between exocrine drainage techniques throughout the history of pancreas transplantation, detailing complications and their impact on graft and patient survival. Specific emphasis has been made on the early postoperative management of these complications and the related surgical infections and their consequences. In light of the results, a number of bladder-drained pancreas grafts required conversion to enteric drainage. As a result of technical improvements, outcomes of the varied enteric exocrine drainage techniques (duodenojejunostomy, duodenoduodenostomy or gastric drainage) have also been discussed i.e., assessing specific risks vs benefits. Pancreatic exocrine secretions can be drained to the urinary or intestinal tracts. Until the late 1990s the bladder drainage technique was used in the majority of transplant centers due to ease of monitoring urine amylase and lipase levels for evaluation of possible rejection. Moreover, bladder drainage was associated at that time with fewer surgical complications, which in contrast to enteric drainage, could be managed with conservative therapies. Nowadays, the most commonly used technique for proper driving of exocrine pancreatic secretions is enteric drainage due to the high rate of urological and metabolic complications associated with bladder drainage. Of note, 10% to 40% of bladder-drained pancreata eventually required enteric conversion at no detriment to overall graft survival. Various surgical techniques were originally described using the small bowel for enteric anastomosis with Roux-en-Y loop or a direct side-to-side anastomosis. Despite the improvements in surgery, enteric drainage complication rates ranging from 2%-20% have been reported. Treatment depends on the presence of any associated complications and the condition of the patient. Intra-abdominal infection represents a potentially very serious problem. Up to 30% of deep wound infections are associated with an anastomotic leak. They can lead not only to high rates of graft loss, but also to substantial mortality. New modifications of established techniques are being developed, such as gastric or duodenal exocrine drainage. Duodenoduodenostomy is an interesting option, in which the pancreas is placed behind the right colon and is oriented cephalad. The main concern of this technique is the challenge of repairing the native duodenum when allograft pancreatectomy is necessary. Identification and prevention of technical failure remains the main objective for pancreas transplantation surgeons. In conclusion, despite numerous techniques to minimize exocrine pancreatic drainage complications e.g., leakage and infection, no universal technique has been standardized. A prospective study/registry analysis may resolve this.

Is Prophylactic Drainage After Pancreas Transplant Associated With Reduced Reoperation Rate?

OBJECTIVES

Advances in surgery and perioperative care have contributed to improved outcomes after pancreas transplant. However, the development of peripancreatic infections carries a poor prognosis. It is not clear whether abdominal drainage is helpful in collection prevention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of adult consecutive pancreas transplants at a single institution between January 2017 and December 2018 was undertaken. Postoperative outcomes were compared between patients in whom prophylactic intraoperative drains were placed and patients with no drains.

RESULTS

We identified 83 patients who underwent pancreas transplant with a median age of 45 years; 54.2% were males, and median body mass index was 25.8. Thirty patients had 1 or 2 drains placed (36.1%). There was no difference in the readmission rate (70.0% vs 60.4%; P = .48), reoperation (20.0% vs 30.2%; P = .44), or percutaneous drainage of peripancreatic infections (20.0% vs 15.1%; P = .56) between patients with drains and no drains, respectively. However, prophylactic drainage was associated with a lower rate of reoperation for peripancreatic infections compared with those who were not drained (0.0% vs 13.2%; P < .05). No graft loss occurred in the drain group.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic drainage after pancreas transplant may be helpful for reduction in the infection rate after reoperation. The risks of drain placement should be weighed against those of drain avoidance.

Early intestinal complications following pancreas transplantation: lessons learned from over 300 cases - a retrospective single-center study

Enteric complications remain a major cause of morbidity in the post-transplant period of pancreas transplantation despite improvements surgical technique. The aim of this single-center study was to analyze retrospectively the early intestinal complications and their potential relation with vascular events. From 2000 to 2016, 337 pancreas transplants were performed with systemic venous drainage. For exocrine secretion, intestinal drainage was done with hand-sewn anastomosis duodenojejunostomy. Twenty-three patients (6.8%) had early intestinal complications. Median age was 39 years (male: 65.2%). Median cold ischemia time was 11 h [IQR: 9-12.4]. Intestinal complications were intestinal obstruction (n = 7); paralytic ileus (n = 5); intestinal fistula without anastomotic dehiscence (n = 3); ischemic graft duodenum (n = 3); dehiscence of duodenojejunostomy (n = 4); and anastomotic dehiscence in jejunum after pancreas transplantectomy (n = 1). Eighteen cases required relaparotomy: adhesiolysis (n = 6); repeated laparotomy without findings (n = 1); transplantectomy (n = 6); primary leak closure (n = 3); re-positioning of the graft (n = 1); and intestinal resection (n = 1). Of the intestinal complications, 4 were associated with vascular thrombosis, resulting in two pancreatic graft losses. Enteric drainage with duodenum-jejunum anastomosis is safe and feasible, with a low rate of intra-abdominal complications. Vascular thrombosis associated with intestinal complications presents a risk factor for the viability of pancreatic grafts, so prevention and early detection is vital.

[Surgical aspects of pancreas transplantation: exocrine drainage. Part 3]

Exocrine drainage is an Achilles heel of pancreas transplantation. The author analyzed the outcomes of pancreas transplantations with different types of exocrine drainage in various centers (n=93). The article will ensure insight into evolution of techniques of exocrine drainage within the historical context and current state of this issue.

Normal Pancreas Graft Appearance in Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

BACKGROUND The main purpose of diagnostic imaging after pancreas transplantation is to exclude potential complications. As long as standard anatomical imaging such as sonography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are sufficient to display macroscopic vasculature, early changes within the graft caused by insufficient microperfusion will not be displayed for evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with pancreas allograft function in good condition were included in the study. No specific preparation was demanded before the MRI examination. The results of MRI were correlated with Igls criteria. It was a preliminary study to examine diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) value and safety in pancreas transplantation. RESULTS Our results indicated that higher fractional anisotropy (FA) values of the graft's head were associated with delayed graft function and insulin intake. We also compared grafts' images in early and late periods and found differences in T1 signal intensity values. DTI is a reliable noninvasive tool, requiring no contrast agent, to assess graft microstructure in correlation with its function, with FA values showing the most consistent results. By Igls criteria, no graft failure, 76% had optimal function, 10% had good function, and 14% had marginal function. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that DTI can be safely used in patients after pancreas transplantation and is advantageous in detecting early as well as late postoperative complications such as intra-abdominal fluid collection, malperfusion, and ischemia of the graft. Our findings correspond with clinical condition and Igls criteria. DTI is free of ionizing agents and is safe for kidney grafts.

Anticoagulation in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation - On what basis?

BACKGROUND

Despite technical refinements, early pancreas graft loss due to thrombosis continues to occur. Conventional coagulation tests (CCT) do not detect hypercoagulability and hence the hypercoagulable state due to diabetes is left untreated. Thromboelastogram (TEG) is an in-vitro diagnostic test which is used in liver transplantation, and in various intensive care settings to guide anticoagulation. TEG is better than CCT because it is dynamic and provides a global hemostatic profile including fibrinolysis.

AIM

To compare the outcomes between TEG and CCT (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and international normalized ratio) directed anticoagulation in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant recipients.

METHODS

A single center retrospective analysis comparing the outcomes between TEG and CCT-directed anticoagulation in SPK recipients, who were matched for donor age and graft type (donors after brainstem death and donors after circulatory death). Anticoagulation consisted of intravenous (IV) heparin titrated up to a maximum of 500 IU/h based on CCT in conjunction with various clinical parameters or directed by TEG results. Graft loss due to thrombosis, anticoagulation related bleeding, radiological incidence of partial thrombi in the pancreas graft, thrombus resolution rate after anticoagulation dose escalation, length of the hospital stays and, 1-year pancreas and kidney graft survival between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients who received TEG-directed anticoagulation were compared against 51 contemporaneous SPK recipients (ratio of 1: 3) who were anticoagulated based on CCT. No graft losses occurred in the TEG group, whereas 11 grafts (7 pancreases and 4 kidneys) were lost due to thrombosis in the CCT group (P = 0.06, Fisher’s exact test). The overall incidence of anticoagulation related bleeding (hematoma/ gastrointestinal bleeding/ hematuria/ nose bleeding/ re-exploration for bleeding/ post-operative blood transfusion) was 17.65% in the TEG group and 45.10% in the CCT group (P = 0.05, Fisher’s exact test). The incidence of radiologically confirmed partial thrombus in pancreas allograft was 41.18% in the TEG and 25.50% in the CCT group (P = 0.23, Fisher’s exact test). All recipients with partial thrombi detected in computed tomography (CT) scan had an anticoagulation dose escalation. The thrombus resolution rates in subsequent scan were 85.71% and 63.64% in the TEG group vs the CCT group (P = 0.59, Fisher’s exact test). The TEG group had reduced blood product usage {10 packed red blood cell (PRBC) and 2 fresh frozen plasma (FFP)} compared to the CCT group (71 PRBC/ 10 FFP/ 2 cryoprecipitate and 2 platelets). The proportion of patients requiring transfusion in the TEG group was 17.65% vs 39.25% in the CCT group (P = 0.14, Fisher’s exact test). The median length of hospital stay was 18 days in the TEG group vs 31 days in the CCT group (P = 0.03, Mann Whitney test). The 1-year pancreas graft survival was 100% in the TEG group vs 82.35% in the CCT group (P = 0.07, log rank test) and, the 1-year kidney graft survival was 100% in the TEG group vs 92.15% in the CCT group (P = 0.23, log tank test).

CONCLUSION

TEG is a promising tool in guiding judicious use of anticoagulation with concomitant prevention of graft loss due to thrombosis, and reduces the length of hospital stay.

The homolateral simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: a single-center experience in China

Background

To preliminarily explore the clinical effect of the homolateral simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation in China.

Methods

SPK using the surgical technique was performed in 88 patients from September 2016 to July 2019 in the Department of Transplantation of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Patients were followed up for 2 to 36 months to summarize the efficacy and complications.

Results

Up to now, 83 patients have achieved good clinical efficacy with no major surgical complications, but 3 patients died of severe infection and 2 have graft loss. The serum creatinine (Scr) at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months after operation were 118, 119, 116, 114, 110 umol/L; fasting blood glucose were 5.8, 5.0, 5.0, 4.9, 4.8 mmol/L; and glycated hemoglobin at 3, 6, 12, 24 months after transplantation were 5.2%, 5.5%, 5.2%, 5.1%. One- and 2-year patient, pancreas, and kidney graft survival rates were 96.1%, 93.8%, 95.0% and 96.1%, 93.8%, 95.0%. Main complications included 20 cases of kidney rejection (22.7%), 22 cases of pancreas rejection (25.0%), 31 cases of pulmonary infection (35.2%), 28 cases of gastrointestinal bleeding (31.8%), 2 cases of splenic vein thrombosis (2.3%), 2 case of artery thrombosis and anastomotic leak (2.3%) and 2 cases of pancreas allograft dysfunction (2.3%).

Conclusions

homolateral simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation has a definite therapeutic effect. The relatively simple surgical method can be done with a smaller wound in unilateral fossa iliaca.

Robotic pancreas transplantation: the state of the art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Robotic pancreas transplantation is a novel procedure that aims to reduce surgical invasiveness, and thereby limit complications related to the surgical access. Given that few centers are providing robotic transplantation, this review serves as a state of the science article to outline early experiences and highlight areas for future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pancreas transplantation results in relatively high rates of wound and other surgical complications that are known to deleteriously impact outcomes. The minimally invasive, robotic-assisted approach decreases wound complications. Because of the obesity epidemic, overweight and obese status is encountered in an increasing number of transplant candidates. These candidates are subject to increased wound-related complications and most benefit from a robotic approach. The first clinical reports on laparoscopic, robotic-assisted kidney and pancreas transplantation indicate a significant decrease in wound complications and excellent outcomes in obese patients otherwise denied access to transplantation.

SUMMARY

With excellent results achieved in surgically challenging patients and further accumulation of experience, laparoscopic, robotic-assisted pancreas and kidney transplantation may evolve to a new standard approach.

Preneoplastic Lesion in a Pancreas Allograft: Dilemma for the Pancreas Transplant Surgeon

Although the relationship between immunosuppression and cancer risk is well-documented, the association between immunosuppression and the development of preneoplastic lesions (PNL) is less clear. PNLs pose a unique clinical conundrum in the transplanted pancreas because their prevalence in the general population is not infrequent. We present the case of a 58-year-old man with a history of diabetes mellitus type 1 who underwent successful pancreas transplantation with bladder drainage. His kidney function failed 13 years after his transplant and he developed recurrent painful hematuria with symptomatic anemia 2 years after initiating hemodialysis. Upon work-up, he was found to have a 4 cm intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in his pancreas allograft. At his enteric conversion, the intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm was removed through a distal pancreatectomy due to concern for its malignant potential. He recovered well from surgery and continues to be insulin-free. With the rising incidence of PNLs from improved detection and the improved survival of pancreas allografts, the implications of PNLs may be more pronounced in the future. This case raises several important considerations for the pancreas transplant surgeon regarding adequate allograft surveillance protocols, treatment, and follow-up.

Fence Angioplasty Prevents Narrowing of Venous Anastomosis in Solitary Pancreas Transplant

Background

Graft thrombosis is the leading cause of early graft failure in pancreas transplants. Direct anastomosis grafting of the portal vein to the iliac vein or vena cava generally appears narrowed on postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. However, modification of surgical techniques may prevent venous narrowing, which also prevents thrombosis-related graft failure.

Material/Methods

We performed 31 solitary pancreas transplants since 2015. Retrospective analysis of these patients was performed.

Results

Fence angioplasty was applied in the final 12 cases, and no technical failures or early graft losses occurred in these cases. Three graft losses, including 2 immunologic losses and 1 patient death with functioning graft, occurred after at least postoperative 4 months. The venous anastomoses were evaluated via intraoperative Doppler ultrasound and postoperative CT scans. Intraoperative Doppler ultrasound revealed improved spectral waves of venous anastomoses in the fence group (monophasic spectral wave, 42.9% vs. 0%, p=0.017). The fence-graft applied group had no cases of narrowing, whereas the non-fence group had high narrowing rates on CT scans (84.2% vs. 0%, p<0.001). Furthermore, with less use of postoperative heparin, postoperative bleeding rates were lower in the fence group (36% vs. 0%, p=0.026).

Conclusions

Fence angioplasty is a definitive method for avoiding venous anastomotic stenosis and preventing graft failure due to thrombosis.

Preserved insulin secretion and kidney function in recipients with functional pancreas grafts 1 year after transplantation: a single-center prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

Successful simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) or pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) restores glycemic control. Diabetes and impaired kidney function are common side effects of immunosuppressive therapy. This study addresses glucometabolic parameters and kidney function during the first year.

METHODS

We examined 67 patients with functioning grafts (SPK n = 30, PTA n = 37) transplanted between September 2011 and November 2016 who underwent repeated oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) 8 and 52 weeks after transplantation. Another 19 patients lost their graft the first year post-transplant and 28 patients did not undergo repeated OGTTs and could not be studied. All patients received ATG induction therapy plus tacrolimus, mycophenolate and prednisolone. Glomerular filtration rate was measured before and 8 and 52 weeks after transplantation by serum clearance methods.

RESULTS

From week 8 to 52 after transplantation, mean fasting glucose decreased (SPK: 5.4 ± 0.7 to 5.1 ± 0.8 mmol/L, PTA: 5.4 ± 0.6 to 5.2 ± 0.7 mmol/L; both P < 0.05), and also 120-min post-OGTT glucose (SPK: 6.9 ± 2.9 to 5.7 ± 2.2 mmol/L; P = 0.07, PTA: 6.5 ± 1.7 to 5.7 ± 1.2 mmol/L; P < 0.05). Fasting C-peptide levels also decreased (SPK: 1500 ± 573 to 1078 ± 357 pmol/L, PTA: 1210 ± 487 to 1021 ± 434 pmol/L, both P < 0.005). Measured GFR decreased from enlistment to 8 weeks post transplant in PTA patients (94 ± 22 to 78 ± 19 mL/min/1.73 m2; P < 0.005), but did not deteriorate from week 8 to week 52 (SPK: 55.0 ± 15.1 vs 59.7 ± 11.3 ml/min/1.73 m²; P = 0.19, PTA: 76 ± 19 vs 77 ± 19 mL/min/1.73 m²; P = 0.74).

CONCLUSION

Glycemic control and kidney function remain preserved in recipients with functioning SPK and PTA grafts 1 year after transplantation.

Pancreas transplant rejection episodes are not revealed by biopsies of the donor duodenum in a prospective study with paired biopsies

The surgical technique with duodeno-duodenal enteroanastomosis of pancreas transplants allows for representative endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle biopsies of the donor duodenum and the pancreas graft. We assessed whether histological findings in transplanted donor duodenal biopsies can indicate rejection in the transplanted pancreas. Since September 2012, a duodeno-duodenal enteroanastomosis has been the default technique for pancreas transplantations at our center. In 67 recipients we prospectively examined 113 endoscopic ultrasound-guided procedures with representative biopsies from the duodenum grafts and the pancreas grafts (97 per protocol and 16 on indication). All graft biopsies were evaluated according to established rejection criteria. A total of 22 biopsy-proven pancreas rejections were detected, with 2 matching duodenal biopsies showing rejection. This gives a sensitivity of 9% for detection of a pancreas rejection by duodenal biopsies. The other matching duodenal biopsies were either normal (n = 13) or indeterminate (n = 7). Rejection of the donor duodenum was found in only 6/113 biopsies, with 2 concurrent pancreas rejections. In conclusion, the donor duodenum is not a useful reporter organ for rejection in the pancreas graft.