1
|
Zhong W, Osther P, Pearle M, Choong S, Mazzon G, Zhu W, Zhao Z, Gutierrez J, Smith D, Moussa M, Pal SK, Saltirov I, Ahmad M, Hamri SB, Chew B, Aquino A, Krambeck A, Khadgi S, Sur RL, Güven S, Gamal W, Li J, Liu Y, Ferretti S, Kamal W, Ye L, Bernardo N, Almousawi S, Abdelkareem M, Durutovic O, Kamphuis G, Maroccolo M, Ye Z, Alken P, Sarica K, Zeng G. International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guideline on staghorn calculi management. World J Urol 2024; 42:189. [PMID: 38526675 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04816-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The stone burden based management strategy reported in the guidelines published by different associations is well known for a long time. Staghorn calculi, representing the largest burden and most complex stones, is one of the most challenging cases to practicing urologists in clinical practice. The International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) has released a series of guidelines on the management of urolithiasis. PURPOSE To develop a series of recommendations for the contemporary management management of staghorn calculi and to provide a clinical framework for urologists treating patients with these complex stones. METHODS A comprehensive literature search for articles published in English between 01/01/1976 and 31/12/2022 in the PubMed, OVID, Embase and Medline database is performed. A series of recommendations are developed and individually graded following the review of literature and panel discussion. RESULTS The definition, pathogenesis, pathophysiology, preoperative evaluation, intraoperative treatment strategies and procedural advice, early postoperative management, follow up and prevention of stone recurrence are summarized in the present document. CONCLUSION A series of recommendations regarding the management of staghorn calculi, along with related commentary and supporting documentation offered in the present guideline is intended to provide a clinical framework for the practicing urologists in the management of staghorn calculi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Zhong
- Department of Urology and Key Laboratory of Guangdong, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Palle Osther
- Department of Urology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Margaret Pearle
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Simon Choong
- Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital, University College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Giorgio Mazzon
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Wei Zhu
- Department of Urology and Key Laboratory of Guangdong, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhijian Zhao
- Department of Urology and Key Laboratory of Guangdong, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jorge Gutierrez
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Daron Smith
- Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital, University College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Mohamad Moussa
- Department of Urology, Al Zahraa Hospital University Medical Center and Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Iliya Saltirov
- Department of Urology and Nephrology, Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Mumtaz Ahmad
- Department of Urology, Ganga Ram Hospital, Ganga Ram Hospital and Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Saeed Bin Hamri
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ministry of the National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ben Chew
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Albert Aquino
- Department of Urology, Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center, Manila, Philippines
| | - Amy Krambeck
- Department of Urology, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sanjay Khadgi
- Department of Urology, Vayodha Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Roger L Sur
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Selcuk Güven
- Department of Urology, Meram School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Wael Gamal
- Department of Urology, Sohag University Hospital, Sohâg, Egypt
| | - Jianxing Li
- Department of Urology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Yongda Liu
- Department of Urology and Key Laboratory of Guangdong, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Wissam Kamal
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Liefu Ye
- Urology Department, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian, China
| | - Norberto Bernardo
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Shabir Almousawi
- Department of Urology, Sabah Al-Ahmad Urology Centre, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Mohamed Abdelkareem
- Department of Urology, Hazm Mebaireek General Hospital (HMGH), Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar
| | - Otas Durutovic
- Department of Urology, Clinic of Urology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Guido Kamphuis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marcus Maroccolo
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Base of the Federal District, Brasília, Brazil
| | - Zhangqun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Peter Alken
- Department of Urology, University Clinic Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Kermal Sarica
- Department of Urology, Medical School, Biruni University, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Guohua Zeng
- Department of Urology and Key Laboratory of Guangdong, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Y, Xi H, Yu Y, Cheng X, Yang H, Deng W, Liu W, Wang G, Zhou X. Flexible ureteroscopy with novel flexible ureteral access sheath versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of 2-3 cm renal stones. Int J Urol 2024; 31:281-286. [PMID: 38017651 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess and compare the effectiveness and safety of flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) with a novel flexible ureteral access sheath (f-UAS) versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (mini-PCNL) in treating 2-3 cm renal stones. METHODS Retrospectively analyzed consecutive cases that underwent f-URS with f-UAS (12/14 Fr) from January 29, 2022, to November 30, 2022. Consecutive cases that underwent mini-PCNL (18 Fr) from June 5, 2021, to January 26, 2022, were selected as controls. The f-UAS is a novel device with a 10 cm anterior tip that passively bends along with the f-URS to enter the renal calyx. We analyzed demographic characteristics, stone parameters, operative time, stone-free rates (SFR), hospitalization time, and complication. RESULTS A total of 96 consecutive cases that underwent f-URS with f-UAS and 96 consecutive cases that underwent mini-PCNL were included in the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time (p = 0.06), stone volume clearance (p = 0.533) and complete SFR (p = 0.266) on the first postoperative day or residual Stone after 1 month (p = 0.407). We observed a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (1.4 days vs. 2.1 days; p < 0.001) and a lower decrease in hemoglobin levels (0.39 g/dL vs. 0.68 g/dL; p < 0.001) in the f-UAS group. The mini-PCNL group had a significantly higher overall complication rate (13.5%) compared with the f-UAS group (5.2%; p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS In the treatment of 2-3 cm renal stones, f-URS with a novel f-UAS may provide a superior alternative to mini-PCNL, potentially challenging its established status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujun Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Haibo Xi
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yue Yu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xiaofeng Cheng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Heng Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Wen Deng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Gongxian Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xiaochen Zhou
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Senel S, Ceviz K, Ozden C, Gultekin H, Gokkaya CS, Koudonas A. The fate of clinically insignificant residual fragments following retrograde intrarenal surgery and factors affecting spontaneous passage. Urolithiasis 2024; 52:39. [PMID: 38413415 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01544-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
The remaining stone fragments after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) can lead to stone recurrence/regrowth, or stone-related events (SRE). We aimed to delineate the clinical circumstances that are decisive for spontaneous passage of clinical insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) (primary outcome) and define risk factors for stone recurrence/regrowth and their clinical manifestation (secondary outcome). A total of 115 patients who had CIRF following RIRS were included in this study. Demographic, clinical data, stone, and anatomic characteristics including infundibulopelvic angle (IPA), infundibular length (IL) and follow-up data of patients were analyzed. The mean follow-up time was 27.5 ± 6.9 months. 31 (26.9%) patients passed the CIRF spontaneously. Patients were divided into two groups as spontaneous fragment passage group and fragment remaining group and compared with respect to demographic, clinical, stone-related, and anatomic characteristics. 61.2% of patients had lower pole CIRF in fragment remaining group and 83.3% of patients in spontaneous fragment passage group (p = 0.031). In addition, IPA was wider in spontaneous fragment passage group (60.7° vs 51.4°, p = 0.001). A subanalysis was performed for fragment remaining group. In 84 patients, 44 (52.4%) patients were stable for their CIRF at their follow-up and included in stable group. 40 (47.6%) patients experienced stone re-growth (27 patients) or SRE (13 patients) at their follow up. Patients in re-growth/SRE group were older (49.1 vs 39.4 years, p = 0.047), had higher body mass index (28.2 vs 27 kg/m2, p = 0.03) and larger CIRF (2.8 vs 2.1 mm). CIRFs may be not expelled spontaneously and they may lead to additional morbidity and lithotripsy interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samet Senel
- Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Üniversiteler Mahallesi, 1604. Cadde No: 9 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Kazim Ceviz
- Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Üniversiteler Mahallesi, 1604. Cadde No: 9 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cuneyt Ozden
- Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Üniversiteler Mahallesi, 1604. Cadde No: 9 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Gultekin
- Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Üniversiteler Mahallesi, 1604. Cadde No: 9 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cevdet Serkan Gokkaya
- Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Üniversiteler Mahallesi, 1604. Cadde No: 9 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Antonios Koudonas
- First Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cui D, Ma Q, Xie S, Wang G, Li G, Chen G. Comparison of the effectiveness of two adjustable negative pressure ureteral access sheaths combined with flex ureteroscopy for ≤ 2 cm renal stones. Sci Rep 2024; 14:4745. [PMID: 38413652 PMCID: PMC10899199 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55333-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
To compare the safety and effectiveness of the combination of intelligent intrarenal pressure control platforms (IPCP) and flexible ureteral access sheath (FUAS) combined with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the treatment of renal stones less than 2 cm. We retrospectively collected 383 patients with renal stones who underwent RIRS in our department from June 2022 to October 2023. Inclusion criteria: stone length or the sum of multiple stone lengths ≤ 2 cm. Finally, 99 cases were included and divided into an IPCP group (n = 40) and FUAS group (n = 59) based on surgical methods. The main endpoint was the stone-free rate (SFR) at third months after surgery, with no residual stones or stone fragments less than 2 mm defined as stone clearance. The secondary endpoints were surgical time and perioperative complications, including fever, sepsis, septic shock, and perirenal hematoma. There was no statistically significant difference in general information between the two groups, including age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, stone side, stone location, stone length, urine bacterial culture, and hydronephrosis. The operation time for IPCP group and FUAS group was 56.83 ± 21.33 vs 55.47 ± 19.69 min (p = 0.747). The SFR of IPCP group and FUAS group on the first postoperative day was 75.00% vs 91.50% (p = 0.024). The SFR was 90.00% vs 94.90% in the third month (p = 0.349).In IPCP group, there were 11 cases with stones located in the lower renal calyces and 17 cases in FUAS group. The SFR of the two groups on the first day and third months after surgery were 45.50% vs 88.20% (p = 0.014) and 63.60% vs 94.10% (p = 0.040), respectively, with statistical differences. For kidney stones ≤ 2 cm, there was no difference in SFR and the incidence of infection-related complications between IPCP and FUAS combined with RIRS, both of which were superior to T-RIRS. For lower renal caliceal stones, FUAS has a higher SFR compared to IPCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deheng Cui
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Longyan, Longyan, 364000, Fujian, China
| | - Qinghong Ma
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Longyan, Longyan, 364000, Fujian, China
| | - Shengbiao Xie
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Longyan, Longyan, 364000, Fujian, China
| | - Guangzhi Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Longyan, Longyan, 364000, Fujian, China
| | - Guanghai Li
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Longyan, Longyan, 364000, Fujian, China.
| | - Guoqiang Chen
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Longyan, Longyan, 364000, Fujian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kingma RA, Doppen C, Bus MTJ, Altobelli E, de Jong IJ, Roemeling S. The significance of clinically insignificant residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis into the relevance of complete stone clearance. World J Urol 2024; 42:78. [PMID: 38353780 PMCID: PMC10866741 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04774-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE After treatment for kidney stones, residual fragments with a diameter of ≤ 4 mm are traditionally referred to as 'clinically insignificant residual fragments'. We hypothesize that patients with these fragments are at an increased risk for stone-related morbidity, such as complaints, hydronephrosis, and stone regrowth, when compared to stone-free patients. This study aimed to investigate the relevance of complete stone clearance in surgical treatment of urolithiasis. METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy between 2015 and 2020 were included if a CT-scan was available within 6 months after the procedure, and the follow-up duration was at least 1 year. The stone-free status at the end of the first stone episode during the study period was categorized as fully stone-free, not stone-free with small residual fragments (≤ 4 mm) and not stone-free with large residual fragments (> 4 mm). Follow-up data were collected, including stone-related events and re-intervention rates. RESULTS A total of 103 subjects were included with a median follow-up of 21.4 months. Stone-related events occurred in 10 (29.4%) of the fully stone-free subjects, 20 (58.8%) of the subjects with small residual fragments and 25 (71.4%) of the subjects with large residual fragments. The stone-related event-free survival per subgroup resulted in a significantly different survival distribution in a log rank test (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION A complete stone-free status seems to be of fundamental importance for decreasing stone-related morbidity. Further developments and research should focus on optimizing the full clearance of stone material during PCNL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riemer A Kingma
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Carleen Doppen
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mieke T J Bus
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Emanuela Altobelli
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Igle Jan de Jong
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn Roemeling
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zaza MMA, Tawfeek AM, Salem TAEM, Soliman MIS, Hassan Ali M. Risk factors of stone residual after retrograde intrarenal surgery: A prospective cohort study. Urologia 2024:3915603231222083. [PMID: 38193436 DOI: 10.1177/03915603231222083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complete removal of renal stones is crucial for optimal patient outcomes, but recent studies have reported residual stones after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). This study aimed to identify the associated risk factors to improve patient management and treatment selection. METHODS This cohort study was conducted over 18 months at two hospitals and recruited adult patients with renal stones less than 3 cm. Preoperative assessment included medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and radiological imaging. Intraoperative and postoperative data collection and follow-up were conducted to evaluate surgical success and potential complications. RESULTS A total of 100 patients were included, with a mean age of 45.3 ± 10.7 years and a mean BMI of 26.2 ± 1.4 kg/m2. Approximately 19% of the patients had residual stones after the RIRS procedure. The RUSS score showed good diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.843, and the optimal cut point was ⩾2.0 with a sensitivity of 52.6% and specificity of 95.1%. Independent predictors of residual stones were multiple sites (OR = 24.98; p = 0.002), multiple stones (OR = 13.62, p = 0.002), stone size of 21-30 mm (OR = 4.91, p = 0.038), lower calyx site (OR = 4.85, p = 0.033), and surgeon experience of fewer than 50 cases (OR = 6.82, p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS This study identifies several factors associated with residual stones after RIRS for renal stones, including stone size, location, number, and surgeon experience. The study suggests that the RUSS score can be used as a reliable tool for predicting the likelihood of residual stones, which can help clinicians in patient selection and treatment planning.
Collapse
|
7
|
Giulioni C, Castellani D, Traxer O, Gadzhiev N, Pirola GM, Tanidir Y, da Silva RD, Glover X, Giusti G, Proietti S, Mulawkar PM, De Stefano V, Cormio A, Teoh JYC, Galosi AB, Somani BK, Emiliani E, Gauhar V. Experimental and clinical applications and outcomes of using different forms of suction in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Results from a systematic review. Actas Urol Esp 2024; 48:57-70. [PMID: 37302691 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the latest advances in suction devices and evaluate their effect in Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and ureteroscopy for stones. BASIC PROCEDURES A systematic literature search was performed on 4th January 2023 using Scopus, PubMed, and EMBASE. Only English papers were included; both pediatric and adult studies were accepted. Duplicate studies, case reports, letters to the editor, and meeting abstracts were excluded. MAIN FINDINGS Twenty-one papers were selected. Several methods have been proposed for suction use in RIRS, such as through the ureteral access sheath or directly to the scope. Artificial intelligence can also regulate this system, monitoring pressure and perfusion flow values. All the proposed techniques showed satisfactory perioperative results for operative time, stone-free rate (SFR), and residual fragments. Moreover, the reduction of intrarenal pressure (induced by aspiration) was also associated with a lower infection rate. Even the studies that considered kidney stones with a diameter of 20 mm or higher reported higher SFR and reduced postoperative complications. However, the lack of well-defined settings for suction pressure and fluid flow prevents the standardization of the procedure. CONCLUSION Aspiration device in the surgical treatment of urinary stones favours a higher SFR, reducing infectious complications, as supported by the included studies. RIRS with a suction system provided to be a natural successor to the traditional technique, regulating intrarenal pressure and aspirating fine dust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Giulioni
- Servicio de Urología, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Universidad Politécnica Marche, Ancona, Italy.
| | - D Castellani
- Servicio de Urología, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Universidad Politécnica Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - O Traxer
- Servicio de Urología, Universidad de La Sorbona, Hospital Tenon (AP-HP), París, France
| | - N Gadzhiev
- Servicio de Endourología, Universidad Médica Estatal de San Petersburgo, Saint-Petersburgo, Russia
| | - G M Pirola
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital San Giuseppe, Grupo MultiMedica, Milán, Italy
| | - Y Tanidir
- Departamento de Urología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Marmara, Estambul, Turkey
| | - R D da Silva
- Departamento de Urología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Colorado, United States
| | - X Glover
- Departamento de Urología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Colorado, United States
| | - G Giusti
- Centro Europeo de Entrenamiento en Endourología, Hospital San Raffaele IRCCS, Milán, Italy
| | - S Proietti
- Centro Europeo de Entrenamiento en Endourología, Hospital San Raffaele IRCCS, Milán, Italy
| | - P M Mulawkar
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Superespecializado de Tirthankar, Akola, India; Universidad de Edimburgo, Edimburgo, United Kingdom
| | - V De Stefano
- Servicio de Urología, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Universidad Politécnica Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - A Cormio
- Servicio de Urología, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Universidad Politécnica Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - J Y-C Teoh
- Clínica de Urología S.H. Ho, Servicio de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad China de Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - A B Galosi
- Servicio de Urología, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Universidad Politécnica Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - B K Somani
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Southampton, NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - E Emiliani
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Gauhar
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital General Ng Teng Fong, Singapur, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Goel V, Dat A, Jackman M, Davis M, Sidoti R, Winter H, McCahy P. Ureterorenoscopic stone procedures have low success rates and poor post-operative follow-up: results from an Australian tertiary health service. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2981-2985. [PMID: 37043690 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the results of ureterorenoscopy (URS) for upper tract urolithiasis in a contemporary Australian tertiary healthcare setting. METHODS Hospital records of all URS stone procedures performed between January 2017 and December 2018 in a metropolitan service were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome measures including stone free rates, adherence to postoperative follow-up and complications rates were recorded. RESULTS 385 patients (387 renal units) with mean age 53.8 (range 18-89) underwent URS for stones measuring between 2 and 27 mm (median 8 mm). 465 URS were performed with 1029 total procedures performed. 48.6% of operations were performed as day cases. Complications were recorded in 9% of the 465 URS cases with 42.9% of these Clavien II or more. The representation rate to our Emergency Departments was 15.4%. Only 49.1% (201) of patients had a follow-up review with imaging to assess stone free rates. Of the 201 patients who underwent imaging, only 38.3% were stone free. Stone analysis was performed in 34.5%. CONCLUSION Less than half of all patients were reviewed despite undergoing expensive, time consuming surgery for a condition with a high recurrence rate. In agreement with recent publications stone-free rates were low, with significant complications and representation rates. Stone surgery should be given the attention and resources equivalent to cancer surgery to improve results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2b.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay Goel
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anthony Dat
- Department of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Jackman
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle Davis
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roberta Sidoti
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hugo Winter
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Philip McCahy
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Memik O, Voyvoda B, Ustuner M, Karsli O, Halat AO, Ozcan L. What is the safe and effective dilator number during access in PCNL? Three-shot dilation versus classical sequential Amplatz dilation. BMC Urol 2023; 23:197. [PMID: 38031043 PMCID: PMC10687924 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01368-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although PCNL has been used for a long time to treat nephrolithiasis, there is still contradictory information concerning the use of the dilation method. In this study, we aimed to compare conventional sequential Amplatz dilatation (SAD) using ten dilators and a method using three dilators (12, 20, and 30 Fr), which we named "three-shot dilatation" (3SD), in terms of fluoroscopy time (FT), operation time, bleeding and stone-free rates. METHODS The study included patients who underwent PCNL with the SAD and 3SD methods. A different surgeon with extensive endourology experience applied each technique. One of the surgeons operated on the patients using the SAD method with ten dilators, and the other surgeon performed the operations using the 3SD method involving three Amplatz dilators (12, 20, and 30 Fr). RESULTS A total of 283 patients, 138 in the 3SD group and 145 in the SAD group, were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 47.32 ± 13.71 years. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding preoperative characteristics (p > 0.05). The FTs of access 2, total access, and total operation were significantly shorter in the 3SD group (p = 0.0001). The decrease in hemoglobin was statistically significant in the 3SD group compared to the SAD group (p = 0.022), while the blood transfusion requirements of the groups were similar (p = 0.176). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding stone-free rates (p = 0.973). In four patients in the SAD group, re-access was necessary due to the loss of passage due to the guide wire slipping out of its place. CONCLUSION Intraoperative FT can be shortened using the described 3SD method without compromising surgical safety. However, this method can be used as an intermediate step in the transition to one-shot dilation by surgeons experienced in performing SAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omur Memik
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital, Lojman Sokak, Derince, Kocaeli, 41900, Turkey.
| | - Bekir Voyvoda
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital, Lojman Sokak, Derince, Kocaeli, 41900, Turkey
| | - Murat Ustuner
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital, Lojman Sokak, Derince, Kocaeli, 41900, Turkey
| | - Onur Karsli
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital, Lojman Sokak, Derince, Kocaeli, 41900, Turkey
| | - Ahmed Omer Halat
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital, Lojman Sokak, Derince, Kocaeli, 41900, Turkey
| | - Levent Ozcan
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen Y, Cheng X, Yang H, Deng W, Chen L, Wang G, Zhou X. Optimal placement of flexible ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Urolithiasis 2023; 51:106. [PMID: 37592131 PMCID: PMC10435627 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-023-01469-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
This study aims to explore the optimal location of flexible ureteral access sheath (f-UAS) in retrograde intrarenal lithotripsy (RIRS). RIRS model was built by AutoCAD 2011 software, and imported COMSOL 5.6 software to computer simulation. An RIRS model was constructed in vitro to analyze the distribution pattern of stone fragments and compare the weight of stone fragments carried out by the irrigation fluid when the f-UAS is in different positions. Computer simulation showed that the highest flow of irrigation fluid was in the channel of flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) and in the lumen of f-UAS. From the f-URS to the renal collection system and then to the f-UAS, the velocity of irrigation fluid changes gradually from high-flow to low-flow and then to high-flow. When the f-URS and the f-UAS are at the same level, the irrigation fluid is always at a state of high flow during the process from f-URS to f-UAS. When the f-URS and the f-UAS are at the same level, it can increase the local intrarenal pressure (IRP) at the front of f-URS. The stone fragments are mainly sediment in the low-flow region of irrigation fluid. More stone fragments could follow the irrigation fluid out of the body when the tip of f-URS and the tip of f-UAS are at the same level (P < 0.001). The f-UAS should be brought closer to the stone in RIRS. And more stone fragments can be taken out of the body by the effect of irrigation fluid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujun Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xiaofeng Cheng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
| | - Heng Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
| | - Wen Deng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
| | - Luyao Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
| | - Gongxian Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
| | - Xiaochen Zhou
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wong VKF, Que J, Kong EK, Abedi G, Nimmagadda N, Emmott AS, Paterson RF, Lange D, Lundeen CJ, Nevo A, Shee K, Moore J, Pais V, Sur RL, Bechis SK, Miller NL, Hsi R, Knudsen BE, Sourial M, Humphreys MR, Stern KL, Eisner BH, Chew BH. The Fate of Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Results from the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence Research Consortium. J Endourol 2023; 37:617-622. [PMID: 36960704 DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Residual fragments (RFs) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and clinical course. There is a paucity of studies that evaluate the natural history of RFs after PCNL. The objective of this study is to compare rates of reintervention, complications, stone growth, and passage in patients with RFs >4, ≤4, and ≤2 mm after PCNL. Methods: Sites from the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence (EDGE) research consortium examined data of PCNL patients from 2015 to 2019 with at least 1-year follow-up. RF passage, regrowth, reintervention, and complications were recorded and RFs were stratified into >4 and ≤4 mm groups, as well as >2 and ≤2 mm groups. Potential predictors for stone-related events after PCNL were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. It was hypothesized that larger RF thresholds would result in lower passage rates, faster regrowth, and greater clinically significant events (complications and reinterventions) than smaller RF thresholds. Results: A total of 439 patients with RFs >1 mm on CT postoperative day 1 were included in this study. For RFs >4 mm, rates of reintervention were found to be significantly higher and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed significantly higher rates of stone-related events. Passage and RF regrowth were not found to be significantly different compared with RFs ≤4 mm. However, RFs ≤2 mm had significantly higher rates of passage, and significantly lower rates of fragment regrowth (>1 mm), complications, and reintervention compared with RFs >2 mm. On multivariable analysis, older age, body mass index, and RF size were found to be predictive of stone-related events. Conclusions: With the largest cohort to date, this study by the EDGE research consortium further confirms that clinically insignificant residual fragment is problematic for patients after PCNL, particularly in older more obese patients with larger RFs. Our study underscores the importance of complete stone clearance post-PCNL and challenges the use of Clinically insignificant residual fragment (CIFR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor K F Wong
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jessica Que
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Emily K Kong
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Garen Abedi
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Anthony S Emmott
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ryan F Paterson
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dirk Lange
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Colin J Lundeen
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amihay Nevo
- Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin Shee
- Department of Urology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Jonathan Moore
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Vernon Pais
- Department of Urology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Roger L Sur
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Seth K Bechis
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Nicole L Miller
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ryan Hsi
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Bodo E Knudsen
- Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael Sourial
- Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Karen L Stern
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Brian H Eisner
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ben H Chew
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zeng G, Zhong W, Mazzon G, Choong S, Pearle M, Agrawal M, Scoffone CM, Fiori C, Gökce MI, Lam W, Petkova K, Sabuncu K, Gadzhiev N, Pietropaolo A, Emiliani E, Sarica K. International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) Guideline on percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022; 74:653-668. [PMID: 35099162 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.04752-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) would like to release the latest guideline on percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and to provide a clinical framework for surgeons performing PCNLs. These recommendations were collected and appraised from a systematic review and assessment of the literature covering all aspects of PCNLs from the PubMed database between January 1, 1976, and July 31, 2021. Each generated recommendation was graded using a modified GRADE methodology. The quality of the evidence was graded using a classification system modified from the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Forty-seven recommendations were summarized and graded, which covered the following issues, indications and contraindications, stone complexity evaluation, preoperative imaging, antibiotic strategy, management of antithrombotic therapy, anesthesia, position, puncture, tracts, dilation, lithotripsy, intraoperative evaluation of residual stones, exit strategy, postoperative imaging and stone-free status evaluation, complications. The present guideline on PCNL was the first in the IAU series of urolithiasis management guidelines. The recommendations, tips and tricks across the PCNL procedures would provide adequate guidance for urologists performing PCNLs to ensure safety and efficiency in PCNLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guohua Zeng
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen Zhong
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Giorgio Mazzon
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Simon Choong
- University College Hospital of London, Institute of Urology, London, UK
| | - Margaret Pearle
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Madhu Agrawal
- Department of Urology, Center for Minimally Invasive Endourology, Global Rainbow Healthcare, Agra, India
| | | | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Mehmet I Gökce
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ankara, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Wayne Lam
- Division of Urology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kremena Petkova
- Military Medical Academy, Department of Urology and Nephrology, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Kubilay Sabuncu
- Department of Urology, Karacabey State Hospital, Karacabey-Bursa, Turkey
| | - Nariman Gadzhiev
- Department of Urology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Amelia Pietropaolo
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Esteban Emiliani
- Department of Urology, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kemal Sarica
- Medical School, Department of Urology, Biruni University, Istanbul, Turkey -
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen Y, Zheng L, Lin L, Li C, Gao L, Ke L, Kuang R, Chen J. A novel flexible vacuum-assisted ureteric access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int 2022; 130:586-588. [PMID: 35986898 PMCID: PMC9826103 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yujun Chen
- Nanchang University Medical CollegeNanchangChina
| | - Liangliang Zheng
- Department of UrologyJiangxi Provincial People's HospitalNanchangChina
| | - Longhui Lin
- Department of UrologyJiangxi Provincial People's HospitalNanchangChina
| | - Chen Li
- Department of UrologyJiangxi Provincial People's HospitalNanchangChina
| | - Liang Gao
- Department of UrologyJiangxi Provincial People's HospitalNanchangChina
| | - Longlong Ke
- Department of UrologyJiangxi Provincial People's HospitalNanchangChina
| | - Renrui Kuang
- Department of UrologyJiangxi Provincial People's HospitalNanchangChina
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of UrologyJiangxi Provincial People's HospitalNanchangChina
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dorantes-Carrillo LA, Basulto-Martínez M, Suárez-Ibarrola R, Heinze A, Proietti S, Flores-Tapia JP, Esqueda-Mendoza A, Giusti G. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones >1cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:259-270. [PMID: 33627307 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Although miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both options for treating >1cm kidney stones, controversies exist on whether one is more effective and safer than the other. OBJECTIVE To systematically appraise randomized trials comparing the effectiveness and safety of mPCNL and RIRS for treating >1cm kidney stones. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic search on PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted in August 2020 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). Randomized trials comparing mPCNL and RIRS for >1cm kidney stones, and reporting stone-free rate (SFR), hemoglobin drop, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and/or complications, were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Eight studies compared mPCNL and RIRS, but one was not included due to its high risk of bias. SFR was higher for mPCNL (RR: 1.06 [95% coefficient interval {CI}, 1.01-1.10], p=0.008). Hemoglobin drop was higher for mPCNL (mean difference [MD]: 0.35 [95% CI, 0.05-0.65] g/dl, p=0.02); however, transfusion rates were similar (p=0.44). Complication rate was similar between mPCNL and RIRS (p=0.39), and the LOS was higher for mPCNL (MD: 1.11 [95% CI, 0.06-2.16] d, p=0.04). A subgroup analysis of lower pole stones showed that SFR was higher for mPCNL (RR: 1.09 [95% CI, 1.00-1.19], p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS Both approaches are effective and safe. Among these approaches, mPCNL has a higher SFR than RIRS for overall >1cm renal and lower pole stones, but longer LOS, and a higher hemoglobin drop that does not translate into higher transfusion rates. Complications are comparable. PATIENT SUMMARY Randomized trials have evaluated whether miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery is more effective and safer for treating >1cm stones. After comparing the stone-free rate, hemoglobin drop, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, and complications between both the approaches, mPCNL was found to be slightly more effective, but both were equally safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mario Basulto-Martínez
- European Training Center in Endourology, Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Península de Yucatán, Merida, Mexico.
| | - Rodrigo Suárez-Ibarrola
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Silvia Proietti
- European Training Center in Endourology, Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Juan Pablo Flores-Tapia
- Division of Nephrology, Urology and Transplant Surgery, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Península de Yucatán, Merida, Mexico
| | - Antonio Esqueda-Mendoza
- Department of Urology, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Península de Yucatán, Merida, Mexico
| | - Guido Giusti
- European Training Center in Endourology, Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yu Y, Xi H, Chen Y, Li X, Liu W, Hu J, Deng J, Liu X, Lin L, Li C, Wang M, Fu B, Wang G, Kuang R, Zhou X. Fibrin gel-assisted stone extraction in retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int 2021; 129:170-173. [PMID: 34856054 PMCID: PMC9300148 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Yu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Haibo Xi
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yujun Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Xuwen Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Jieping Hu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Jun Deng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Xiaoqiang Liu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Longhui Lin
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Mengzhen Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Bin Fu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Gongxian Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Renrui Kuang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Xiaochen Zhou
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yang T, Song R, Meng X, Wei H, Jiang X, Yuan X, Liu X, Jiao Z, Liu J, Shi H. A single center study that evaluates the preclinical use of a newly developed software and moving bed system to facilitate the spontaneous excretion of residual fragments after primary stone treatment (RIRS or PCNL). World J Urol 2021; 40:585-591. [PMID: 34687345 PMCID: PMC8921061 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03863-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We developed a Postural Drainage Lithotripsy System (PDLS) that uses the patient's computed tomography urography (CTU) data to reconstruct the three-dimensional figure of the renal pelvis, provides an individualized inversion and overturning angle and uses gravity to remove residual fragments (RFs). The purpose of this study was to investigate PDLS in the treatment of renal RFs. Methods A stone with a diameter of 4.0 mm was placed in the upper, middle, and lower calyx of the renal model. A total of 60 trials were applied to 20 renal models. The movement trajectory, passage rate, and postural drainage angle of calculi during the treatment of PDLS were observed. Results All of the stones in 60 trials were observed to move during treatment, and 53/60 (88%) were relocated successfully to the renal pelvis. The passage rate of the upper calyx was 14/20 (70%), that of the middle calyx was 20/20 (100%), and that of the lower calyx was 19/20 (95%). Conclusions PDLS can provide individualized inversion and reversal angles and remove stones from the renal model. More clinical trials are needed to verify the above view and evaluate its efficacy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03863-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Yang
- Department of Urology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, 213004, China.,Department of Urology, The Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, 213004, China
| | - Rijin Song
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Xianghu Meng
- Department of Urology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, 213004, China.,Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Hanping Wei
- Department of Urology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, 213004, China.,Department of Urology, The Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, 213004, China
| | - Xinying Jiang
- Department of Urology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, 213004, China.,Department of Urology, The Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, 213004, China
| | - Xiaoliang Yuan
- Department of Urology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, 213004, China.,Department of Urology, The Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, 213004, China
| | - Xiaowu Liu
- Department of Urology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, 213004, China.,Department of Urology, The Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, 213004, China
| | - Zhimin Jiao
- Department of Urology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, 213004, China.,Department of Urology, The Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, 213004, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Urology, The 940th Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Lanzhou, 730050, China
| | - Honglei Shi
- Department of Urology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, 213004, China. .,Department of Urology, The Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, 213004, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hausmann T, Becker B, Gross AJ, Netsch C, Rosenbaum CM. Novel Biocompatible Adhesive to Remove Stone Dust: Usability Trial in a Kidney Model. J Endourol 2021; 35:1223-1228. [PMID: 33559523 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction and Objective: "Clinically insignificant residual fragments" are an independent predictive factor for recurrence of nephrolithiasis. To improve the stone-free rates (SFR), we tested the viability of a novel bioadhesive system for intrarenal embedding and retrieval of residual fragments <1 mm in a kidney model. Materials and Methods: All procedures were performed in a standardized setting, including a kidney model (Kidney module right, Samed GmbH, Dresden) in a plastic basin filled with water. We used a Viper URF flexible ureterorenoscope (fURS) (6.6/8F, Richard Wolf, Knittlingen). A mean amount of 138 mg (standard deviation [SD] ±32.2 mg) of sand grains (range, 0.2-0.8 mm) was inserted in renal calices of the kidney model. We assessed the extraction efficacy of fURS using the bioadhesive system. In total, eight different surgeons performed each one trial, respectively. The endoscopic and macroscopic SFR, the level of the surgeons' experience, and the overall time of stone retrieval were evaluated. Additionally, a survey of the participants was conducted, to assess the contentment with this novel system. Results: The extraction of the sand grains was only possible using the bioadhesive system, otherwise they were too small sized to grab with a retrieval basket. The total SFR was 84% (SD ±11.7%). The operation time (p = 0.052) and the percentage of extracted sand grains (p = 0.194) were not significantly different between experienced and less experienced surgeons. All participants stated that it was a promising technique, which they could imagine using on a daily basis. Conclusions: The bioadhesive system improves the SFR with fragments from 0.2 to 0.8 mm (0% vs 84%). Also, the performance of this operation is not dependent on the surgeon's experience level. This method might improve the SFR in difficult anatomic conditions, that is, lower calices or anomalous kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Hausmann
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Clinic Barmbek (Institution to Which this Work Is Attributed), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Becker
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Clinic Barmbek (Institution to Which this Work Is Attributed), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas J Gross
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Clinic Barmbek (Institution to Which this Work Is Attributed), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christopher Netsch
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Clinic Barmbek (Institution to Which this Work Is Attributed), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Clemens M Rosenbaum
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Clinic Barmbek (Institution to Which this Work Is Attributed), Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Urology, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zeng G, Zhong W, Pearle M, Choong S, Chew B, Skolarikos A, Liatsikos E, Pal SK, Lahme S, Durutovic O, Farahat Y, Khadgi S, Desai M, Chi T, Smith D, Hoznek A, Papatsoris A, Desai J, Mazzon G, Somani B, Eisner B, Scoffone CM, Nguyen D, Ferretti S, Giusti G, Saltirov I, Maroccolo MV, Gökce MI, Straub M, Bernardo N, Lantin PL, Saulat S, Gamal W, Denstedt J, Ye Z, Sarica K. European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis and International Alliance of Urolithiasis Joint Consensus on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:588-597. [PMID: 33741299 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been performed for decades and has gone through many refinements, there are still concerns regarding its more widespread utilization because of the long learning curve and the potential risk of severe complications. Many technical details are not included in the guidelines because of their nature and research protocol. OBJECTIVE To achieve an expert consensus viewpoint on PCNL indications, preoperative patient preparation, surgical strategy, management and prevention of severe complications, postoperative management, and follow-up. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION An international panel of experts from the Urolithiasis Section of the European Association of Urology, International Alliance of Urolithiasis, and other urology associations was enrolled, and a prospectively conducted study, incorporating literature review, discussion on research gaps (RGs), and questionnaires and following data analysis, was performed to reach a consensus on PCNL. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The expert panel consisted of 36 specialists in PCNL from 20 countries all around the world. A consensus on PCNL was developed. The expert panel was not as large as expected, and the discussion on RGs did not bring in more supportive evidence in the present consensus. CONCLUSIONS Adequate preoperative preparation, especially elimination of urinary tract infection prior to PCNL, accurate puncture with guidance of fluoroscopy and/or ultrasonography or a combination, keeping a low intrarenal pressure, and shortening of operation time during PCNL are important technical requirements to ensure safety and efficiency in PCNL. PATIENT SUMMARY Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been a well-established procedure for the management of upper urinary tract stones. However, according to an expert panel consensus, core technical aspects, as well as the urologist's experience, are critical to the safety and effectiveness of PCNL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guohua Zeng
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen Zhong
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Margaret Pearle
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Simon Choong
- Institute of Urology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ben Chew
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Evangelos Liatsikos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | | | - Sven Lahme
- Department of Urology, Siloah St. Trudpert Hospital, Pforzheim, Germany
| | - Otas Durutovic
- Department of Urology, Clinic of Urology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Yasser Farahat
- Department of Urology, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Sanjay Khadgi
- Department of Urology, Vayodha Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Mahesh Desai
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India
| | - Thomas Chi
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daron Smith
- Institute of Urology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Andras Hoznek
- Department of Urology, Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | | | - Janak Desai
- Department of Urology, Samved Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Giorgio Mazzon
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Bhaskar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Brian Eisner
- Deparment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Stefania Ferretti
- Department of Urology, Hospital and University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Guido Giusti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Iliya Saltirov
- Department of Urology and Nephrology, Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | - Mehmet Ilker Gökce
- Department of Urology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Michael Straub
- Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Norberto Bernardo
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Sherjeel Saulat
- Department of Urology, Sindh Institution of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Wael Gamal
- Department of Urology, Sohag University Hospital, Sohag, Egypt
| | - John Denstedt
- Division of Urology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zhangqun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| | - Kemal Sarica
- Department of Urology, Biruni University, Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Interventionelle Therapie: Wann und wie? Urolithiasis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-62454-8_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
20
|
Karsli O, Ustuner M, Voyvoda B, Memik O, Halat AO, Ozcan L. A new percutaneous nephrolithotomy position in horseshoe kidney: 45 degrees sided prone. Cent European J Urol 2020; 73:349-354. [PMID: 33133664 PMCID: PMC7587488 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction In this study we aimed to determine the effects of the 45 degrees sided prone position to the surgeon’s comfort, operation time, fluoroscopy time and complications at the operation of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of kidney stone of horseshoe kidney (HK) or rotation anomaly kidney. Material and methods Thirty eight patients (25 male, 13 female) with renal calculi and HK, underwent PCNL. After the amplatz sheath was inserted into the collecting system, the patients in group 1 (n:20) were taken to the 45 degrees side position to the side of the operation and patients in group 2 (n:18) were operated in classical prone position. Operative data of two groups were compared statistically. Results Mean stone size of group 1 was 557.8 ±244.8 mm3 (188–1175) and group 2 was 590.7 ±172.8 mm3 (423–909) (p = 0.639). In group 1 mean operation time was 78.6 ±21.8 (45–120) minutes and in group 2 was 95.05 ±11.5 (69–120) minutes. The difference for operation time was statistically significant and shorter in the sided group (p = 0.02). Conclusions The working position of rigid nephroscope is 90 degrees to the body after the dorsomedial or dorsolateral access. In our study the position of patient is laterally sided 45 degree and the flexion on the surgeon’s shoulder was minimised. This new position described for PCNL in HK allows comfortable working position for surgeon after upper pole posterior calyces access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onur Karsli
- Health Sciences University, Derince Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Murat Ustuner
- Health Sciences University, Derince Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Bekir Voyvoda
- Health Sciences University, Derince Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Omur Memik
- Health Sciences University, Derince Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Ahmed Omer Halat
- Health Sciences University, Derince Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Levent Ozcan
- Health Sciences University, Derince Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Kocaeli, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cracco CM, Scoffone CM. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) - Tips and tricks to improve outcomes: A systematic review. Turk J Urol 2020; 46:S46-S57. [PMID: 32877638 PMCID: PMC7731958 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed at assessing current efficacy and safety of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) for the treatment of large and/or complex urolithiasis and identifying relevant tips and tricks able to improve its outcomes, mainly deriving from the adjunct of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy to the traditional antegrade approach of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic review was conducted using relevant databases (Ovid Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Sciences), employing "ECIRS" as the search term in all cases, and then adding "endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery" and "flexible ureteroscopy AND percutaneous nephrolithotomy" as search terms for PubMed and Scopus. Original articles and systematic reviews were selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Additionally, the reference lists of the selected publications were checked manually. RESULTS A total of 14 studies were selected for analysis: two systematic reviews, one randomized controlled trial, five nonrandomized comparative studies, three prospective case series, and three retrospective case series. ECIRS achieves high stone-free rates and rather low/low Clavien-Dindo grade complication rates, confirming the role of retrograde ureteroscopy in the maximization of its efficacy and safety. A narrative synthesis of the most recognized tips and tricks of ECIRS is provided. CONCLUSION The contribution of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy during PNL is essential. It plays a dual role, both diagnostic and active, allowing tailoring of the procedure to the patient, urolithiasis, and anatomy of the collecting system and optimization of the PNL efficacy and safety. This is ECIRS: an updated, complete, and versatile version of PNL.
Collapse
|
22
|
Schneider D, Abedi G, Larson K, Ayad M, Yoon R, Patel RM, Landman J, Clayman RV. In Vitro Evaluation of Stone Fragment Evacuation by Suction. J Endourol 2020; 35:187-191. [PMID: 32791862 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Contemporary, flexible stone baskets are unable to extract submillimeter stone fragments at the time of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. In this in vitro study, the feasibility of suctioning submillimeter fragments with a standard Luer Lock syringe through the working channel of a flexible ureteroscope was assessed. Materials and Methods: Phantom stones made from industrial plaster were mechanically fragmented into ≤1 and ≤0.5-mm groups. Both stone groups were divided into five preweighed trial samples. Each stone group was then mixed in a beaker filled with normal saline. A standard 10-mL Luer Lock syringe was connected to a fiber-optic ureteroscope with a 1.2-mm working channel. The syringe was then used to suction stone fragments from the beaker. The suctioned stone fragments and the stone fragments remaining in the beaker after removing the overlying solution were separated, centrifuged with supernatant removed, and dried in an incubator set at 33°C for 1 week. Dried weights were recorded. Results: Mean total weights for ≤0.5 and ≤1.0-mm stone groups at baseline were 0.807 and 0.806 g, respectively. The mean percentages of stone fragments suctioned through the ureteroscope for ≤0.5 and ≤1.0-mm groups were 86% and 86%, respectively (p = 0.973). During suctioning, 64% of stones in the ≤0.5-mm group were trapped in either the working channel of the ureteroscope or within the Luer Lock syringe compared with 78% of stones in the ≤1-mm group (p = 0.001) requiring cessation of the procedure to clear the channel. Conclusions: It is feasible to suction submillimeter stone fragments by connecting a Luer Lock syringe to the working channel of a flexible ureteroscope. The limiting factor for removing stone fragments appears to be the small working channel of flexible ureteroscopes as trapping of fragments during suctioning is common and requires time-consuming removal of the endoscope and clearing of the channel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Schneider
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Garen Abedi
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Krista Larson
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Maged Ayad
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Renai Yoon
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Roshan M Patel
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Jaime Landman
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Ralph V Clayman
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Guven S, Yigit P, Tuncel A, Karabulut İ, Sahin S, Kilic O, Balasar M, Seckiner I, Canda E, Sonmez MG, Tefik T, Boz MY, Atis G, Ergin G, Soytas M, Senel Ç, Kirac M, Kiremit MC, Akand M, Tugcu V, Erkurt B, Muslumanoglu A, Sarica K. Retrograde intrarenal surgery of renal stones: a critical multi-aspect evaluation of the outcomes by the Turkish Academy of Urology Prospective Study Group (ACUP Study). World J Urol 2020; 39:549-554. [PMID: 32347334 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03210-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To outline and evaluate the incidence, management and follow-up of the residual fragments (RFs) following retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) of renal stones by the Turkish Academy of Urology Prospective Study Group (ACUP Study). METHODS Following the ethical committee approval, 15 centers providing data regarding the incidence, management, and follow-up of RFs after RIRS were included and all relevant information was recorded into the same electronic database program ( https://acup.uroturk.org.tr/ ) created by Turkish Urology Academy for Residual Stone Study. RESULTS A total of 1112 cases underwent RIRS for renal calculi and RFs were observed in 276 cases (24.8%). Of all the parameters evaluated, our results demonstrated no statistically significant relation between preoperative DJ stenting and the presence of RFs (χ2 (1) = 158.418; p = 0.099). RFs were significantly higher in patients treated with UAS (82 patients, 29.3%) during the procedure compared to the cases who did not receive UAS (194 patients, 23.3%) (χ2 (1) = 3.999; p = 0.046). The mean period for a secondary intervention after RIRS was 28.39 (± 12.52) days. Regarding the procedures applied for RF removal, re-RIRS was the most commonly performed approach (56%). CONCLUSIONS Despite the reported safe and successful outcomes, the incidence of RFs is higher, after the RIRS procedure particularly in cases with relatively larger calculi. Such cases need to be followed in a close manner and although a second flexible ureteroscopy is the treatment of choice for fragment removal in the majority of these patients, shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy may also be preferred in selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selcuk Guven
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, TEM Otoyolu No. 1, Bagcilar, 34214, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Pakize Yigit
- Department of Medical Statistics and Medical Informatics, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Altug Tuncel
- Department of Urology, Ankara Numune Research and Training Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - İbrahim Karabulut
- Department of Urology, Erzurum Research and Training Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Selcuk Sahin
- Department of Urology, Bakirköy Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ozcan Kilic
- Department of Urology, Selcuklu Medical School, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Balasar
- Department of Urology, Meram Medical School, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Ilker Seckiner
- Department of Urology, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Erdem Canda
- Department of Urology, Yıldırım Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Giray Sonmez
- Department of Urology, Meram Medical School, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Tzevat Tefik
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medical School, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Yucel Boz
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, TEM Otoyolu No. 1, Bagcilar, 34214, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Atis
- Department of Urology, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Giray Ergin
- Department of Urology, Koru Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Soytas
- Department of Urology, Bakirköy Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Çagdas Senel
- Department of Urology, Ankara Numune Research and Training Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Kirac
- Department of Urology, Koru Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Murat Akand
- Department of Urology, Selcuklu Medical School, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Volkan Tugcu
- Department of Urology, Bakirköy Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bulent Erkurt
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, TEM Otoyolu No. 1, Bagcilar, 34214, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Muslumanoglu
- Department of Urology, Bagcilar Research and Training Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kemal Sarica
- Department of Urology, Biruni University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|