1
|
Kravchenko Y, Sikora K, Wireko AA, Lyndin M. Fluorescence visualization for cancer DETECTION: EXPERIENCE and perspectives. Heliyon 2024; 10:e24390. [PMID: 38293525 PMCID: PMC10827512 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
The current review focuses on the latest advances in the improvement and application of fluorescence imaging technology. Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging is a promising new technique that uses non-specific fluorescent agents and targeted fluorescent tracers combined with a dedicated camera to better navigate and visualize tumors. Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) is used to perform various tasks, helping the surgeon to distinguish lymphatic vessels and nodes from surrounding tissues easily and quickly assess the perfusion of the planned resection area, including intraoperative visualization of metastases. The results of the insertion of fluorescence visualization as an auxiliary method to cancer detection and high-risk metastatic lesions in clinical practice have demonstrated enthusiastic results and huge potential. However, intraoperative fluorescence visualization must not be considered as a main diagnostic or treatment method but as an aid to the surgeon. Thus, fluorescence study does not dispense the diagnostic gold standards of benign or malignant tumors (conventional examination, biopsy, ultrasonography and computed tomography, etc.) and can be done usually during intraoperative treatment. Moreover, as fluorescence surgery and fluorescence diagnostic techniques continue to improve, it is likely that they will evolve towards targeted fluorescence imaging probes that will increasingly target a specific type of cancer cell. The most important point remains the search for highly selective messengers of fluorescent labels, which make it possible to identify tumor cells exclusively in the affected organs and indicate to surgeons the boundaries of their spread and metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaroslav Kravchenko
- Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine
- NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland
| | | | | | - Mykola Lyndin
- Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine
- Institute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sutton PA, van Dam MA, Cahill RA, Mieog S, Polom K, Vahrmeijer AL, van der Vorst J. Fluorescence-guided surgery: comprehensive review. BJS Open 2023; 7:7162090. [PMID: 37183598 PMCID: PMC10183714 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite significant improvements in preoperative workup and surgical planning, surgeons often rely on their eyes and hands during surgery. Although this can be sufficient in some patients, intraoperative guidance is highly desirable. Near-infrared fluorescence has been advocated as a potential technique to guide surgeons during surgery. METHODS A literature search was conducted to identify relevant articles for fluorescence-guided surgery. The literature search was performed using Medical Subject Headings on PubMed for articles in English until November 2022 and a narrative review undertaken. RESULTS The use of invisible light, enabling real-time imaging, superior penetration depth, and the possibility to use targeted imaging agents, makes this optical imaging technique increasingly popular. Four main indications are described in this review: tissue perfusion, lymph node assessment, anatomy of vital structures, and tumour tissue imaging. Furthermore, this review provides an overview of future opportunities in the field of fluorescence-guided surgery. CONCLUSION Fluorescence-guided surgery has proven to be a widely innovative technique applicable in many fields of surgery. The potential indications for its use are diverse and can be combined. The big challenge for the future will be in bringing experimental fluorophores and conjugates through trials and into clinical practice, as well as validation of computer visualization with large data sets. This will require collaborative surgical groups focusing on utility, efficacy, and outcomes for these techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Sutton
- The Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Martijn A van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ronan A Cahill
- RAC, UCD Centre for Precision Surgery, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- RAC, Department of Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sven Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Karol Polom
- Clinic of Oncological, Transplantation and General Surgery, Gdansk Medical University, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Joost van der Vorst
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Consensus Statement on the Use of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging during Pancreatic Cancer Surgery Based on a Delphi Study: Surgeons' Perspectives on Current Use and Future Recommendations. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030652. [PMID: 36765609 PMCID: PMC9913161 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Indocyanine green (ICG) is one of the only clinically approved near-infrared (NIR) fluorophores used during fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS), but it lacks tumor specificity for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Several tumor-targeted fluorescent probes have been evaluated in PDAC patients, yet no uniformity or consensus exists among the surgical community on the current and future needs of FGS during PDAC surgery. In this first-published consensus report on FGS for PDAC, expert opinions were gathered on current use and future recommendations from surgeons' perspectives. A Delphi survey was conducted among international FGS experts via Google Forms. Experts were asked to anonymously vote on 76 statements, with ≥70% agreement considered consensus and ≥80% participation/statement considered vote robustness. Consensus was reached for 61/76 statements. All statements were considered robust. All experts agreed that FGS is safe with few drawbacks during PDAC surgery, but that it should not yet be implemented routinely for tumor identification due to a lack of PDAC-specific NIR tracers and insufficient evidence proving FGS's benefit over standard methods. However, aside from tumor imaging, surgeons suggest they would benefit from visualizing vasculature and surrounding anatomy with ICG during PDAC surgery. Future research could also benefit from identifying neuroendocrine tumors. More research focusing on standardization and combining tumor identification and vital-structure imaging would greatly improve FGS's use during PDAC surgery.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hernandez Vargas S, Lin C, Voss J, Ghosh SC, Halperin DM, AghaAmiri S, Cao HST, Ikoma N, Uselmann AJ, Azhdarinia A. Development of a drug-device combination for fluorescence-guided surgery in neuroendocrine tumors. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS 2020; 25:JBO-200129R. [PMID: 33300316 PMCID: PMC7725236 DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.25.12.126002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE The use of cancer-targeted contrast agents in fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) has the potential to improve intraoperative visualization of tumors and surgical margins. However, evaluation of their translational potential is challenging. AIM We examined the utility of a somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (SSTR2)-targeted fluorescent agent in combination with a benchtop near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging system to visualize mouse xenografts under conditions that simulate the clinical FGS workflow for open surgical procedures. APPROACH The dual-labeled somatostatin analog, Ga67-MMC(IR800)-TOC, was injected into mice (n = 24) implanted with SSTR2-expressing tumors and imaged with the customized OnLume NIRF imaging system (Madison, Wisconsin). In vivo and ex vivo imaging were performed under ambient light. The optimal dose (0.2, 0.5, and 2 nmol) and imaging time point (3, 24, 48, and 72 h) were determined using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as the image quality parameter. Video captures of tumor resections were obtained to provide an FGS readout that is representative of clinical utility. Finally, a log-transformed linear regression model was fitted to assess congruence between fluorescence readouts and the underlying drug distribution. RESULTS The drug-device combination provided high in vivo and ex vivo contrast (CNRs > 3, except lung at 3 h) at all time points with the optimal dose of 2 nmol. The optimal imaging time point was 24-h post-injection, where CNRs > 6.5 were achieved in tissues of interest (i.e., pancreas, small intestine, stomach, and lung). Intraoperative FGS showed excellent utility for examination of the tumor cavity pre- and post-resection. The relationship between fluorescence readouts and gamma counts was linear and strongly correlated (n = 334, R2 = 0.71; r = 0.84; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION The innovative OnLume NIRF imaging system enhanced the evaluation of Ga67-MMC(IR800)-TOC in tumor models. These components comprise a promising drug-device combination for FGS in patients with SSTR2-expressing tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Servando Hernandez Vargas
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States
| | | | - Julie Voss
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Sukhen C. Ghosh
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Daniel M. Halperin
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Solmaz AghaAmiri
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Hop S. Tran Cao
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, Houston, Texas, United States
| | | | - Ali Azhdarinia
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cwalinski T, Polom W, Marano L, Roviello G, D’Angelo A, Cwalina N, Matuszewski M, Roviello F, Jaskiewicz J, Polom K. Methylene Blue-Current Knowledge, Fluorescent Properties, and Its Future Use. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E3538. [PMID: 33147796 PMCID: PMC7693951 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Methylene blue is a fluorescent dye discovered in 1876 and has since been used in different scientific fields. Only recently has methylene blue been used for intraoperative fluorescent imaging. Here, the authors review the emerging role of methylene blue, not only as a dye used in clinical practice, but also as a fluorophore in a surgical setting. We discuss the promising potential of methylene blue together with the challenges and limitations among specific surgical techniques. A literature review of PubMed and Medline was conducted based on the historical, current and future usage of methylene blue within the field of medicine. We reviewed not only the current usage of methylene blue, but we also tried to grasp its' function as a fluorophore in five main domains. These domains include the near-infrared imaging visualization of ureters, parathyroid gland identification, pancreatic tumors imaging, detection of breast cancer tumor margins, as well as breast cancer sentinel node biopsy. Methylene blue is used in countless clinical procedures with a relatively low risk for patients. Usage of its fluorescent properties is still at an early stage and more pre-clinical, as well as clinical research, must be performed to fully understand its potentials and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Cwalinski
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland; (T.C.); (J.J.)
| | - Wojciech Polom
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland; (W.P.); (M.M.)
| | - Luigi Marano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53-100 Siena, Italy; (L.M.); (F.R.)
| | - Giandomenico Roviello
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, viale Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy;
| | - Alberto D’Angelo
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK;
| | - Natalia Cwalina
- Department of Pediatrics Ascension St. John Children’s Hospital, Detroit, MI 48236, USA;
| | - Marcin Matuszewski
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland; (W.P.); (M.M.)
| | - Franco Roviello
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53-100 Siena, Italy; (L.M.); (F.R.)
| | - Janusz Jaskiewicz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland; (T.C.); (J.J.)
| | - Karol Polom
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland; (T.C.); (J.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Successful Localization and Resection of Small Pancreatic Cystic Insulinoma Using Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging: A Case Report and Literature Review. Pancreas 2020; 49:1388-1392. [PMID: 33122530 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic insulinoma is an uncommon tumor. Perioperative localization remained challenging if the tumor is atypical with cystic feature or in small size. Near-infrared (NIR) imaging is a technique by injecting fluorescent dye intravenously, which accumulates to the target lesion and creating signal by laser sources. The signal helps surgeons to identify the lesion during operation, but little experience has been reported regarding the use of imaging NIR technique for localizing cystic insulinoma. We present a 29-year-old female patient with a symptomatic pancreatic cystic insulinoma (1.2 cm) as assessed by clinical symptom, laboratory evidence, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. With an aid of NIR imaging technique, this cystic tumor was localized easily at operation. Also, the fluorescence imaging visualized the tumor part, guided us to identify the safe margin, and preserved the normal pancreatic structure. Pathologic report confirmed that the tumor was a well-differentiated cystic insulinoma. This case demonstrates that pancreatic cystic insulinoma in small size can be intraoperatively localized by NIR imaging, a relatively safe and easy technique.
Collapse
|
7
|
Vargas SH, Lin C, AghaAmiri S, Voss J, Ikoma N, Tran Cao HS, Ghosh SC, Uselmann AJ, Azhdarinia A. A proof-of-concept methodology to validate the in situ visualization of residual disease using cancer-targeted molecular agents in fluorescence-guided surgery. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2020; 11222. [PMID: 34054189 DOI: 10.1117/12.2546190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The clinical need for improved intraoperative tumor visualization has led to the development of targeted contrast agents for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS). A key characteristic of these agents is their high tumor specificity, which could enable detection of residual lesions that would likely be missed by visual inspection. Here, we examine the utility of a promising somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (SSTR2)-targeted fluorescent agent for detecting residual disease in mouse xenografts using FGS and post-operative histopathological validation. Methods Mice (n=2) implanted with SSTR2 overexpressing tumors were injected with 2 nmol of the dual-labeled somatostatin analog, 67Ga-MMC(IR800)-TOC, and tumors were resected 48 h post-injection using traditional white light reflectance and palpation. Tumors underwent gamma counting and histopathology analysis. The wide-field FGS imaging platform (OnLume) was used to evaluate residual disease in situ under ambient light representative of an operating room. Results The tumor was resected with grossly negative margins using conventional inspection and palpation; however, additional in situ residual disease was found in the tumor cavity using FGS imaging. In situ fluorescent tumor contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were 3.0 and 5.2. Agent accumulation was 7.72 and 8.20 %ID/g in tumors and 0.27 and 0.20 %ID/g in muscle. Fluorescence pixel values and gamma counts were highly correlated (r = 0.95, P < 0.048). H&E and IHC staining confirmed cancer positivity and SSTR2-overexpression, respectively. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that the use of clinically relevant fluorescence imaging instrumentation enhances the evaluation of promising FGS agents for in situ visualization of residual disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Servando Hernandez Vargas
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Houston, TX, USA)
| | | | - Solmaz AghaAmiri
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Houston, TX, USA)
| | - Julie Voss
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Houston, TX, USA)
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA)
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA)
| | - Sukhen C Ghosh
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Houston, TX, USA)
| | | | - Ali Azhdarinia
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Houston, TX, USA)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hernandez Vargas S, Kossatz S, Voss J, Ghosh SC, Tran Cao HS, Simien J, Reiner T, Dhingra S, Fisher WE, Azhdarinia A. Specific Targeting of Somatostatin Receptor Subtype-2 for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:4332-4342. [PMID: 31015345 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-3312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinically available intraoperative imaging tools to assist surgeons in identifying occult lesions are limited and partially responsible for the high rate of disease recurrence in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Using the established clinical efficacy of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs as a model, we demonstrate the ability of a fluorescent somatostatin analog to selectively target tumors that overexpress somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (SSTR2) and demonstrate utility for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A multimodality chelator (MMC) was used as a "radioactive linker" to synthesize the fluorescently labeled somatostatin analog, 67/68Ga-MMC(IR800)-TOC. In vivo studies were performed to determine the pharmacokinetic profile, optimal imaging time point, and specificity for SSTR2-expressing tissues. Meso- and microscopic imaging of resected tissues and frozen sections were also performed to further assess specific binding, and binding to human NETs was examined using surgical biospecimens from patients with pancreatic NETs. RESULTS Direct labeling with 67Ga/68Ga provided quantitative biodistribution analysis that was in agreement with fluorescence data. Receptor-mediated uptake was observed in vivo and ex vivo at the macro-, meso-, and microscopic scales. Surgical biospecimens from patients with pancreatic NETs also displayed receptor-specific agent binding, allowing clear delineation of tumor boundaries that matched pathology findings. CONCLUSIONS The radioactive utility of the MMC allowed us to validate the binding properties of a novel FGS agent that could have a broad impact on cancer outcomes by equipping surgeons with real-time intraoperative imaging capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Servando Hernandez Vargas
- The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Susanne Kossatz
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Julie Voss
- The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Sukhen C Ghosh
- The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jo Simien
- The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas Reiner
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Sadhna Dhingra
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - William E Fisher
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Ali Azhdarinia
- The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|