Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas in a Young Pediatric Patient: A Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature

Laparoscopic Warshaw Procedure for Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms in Children

BackgroundSolid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) arising in the body or tail of the pancreas can be amenable to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with or without concomitant splenectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for SPN using the Warshaw technique as a means to preserve spleens in children.MethodsWe reviewed our database of SPN patients 19 years and younger (January 2006-December 2023). Five had a laparoscopic Warshaw procedure. Using the volumetric analysis tool in Sectra, a pediatric radiologist calculated preoperative tumor, pancreas, and spleen volumes (including postoperative organ volumes) on computed tomography. Descriptive statistics were performed.ResultsAll five spleens were salvaged, although small infarcts occurred centrally in four patients. Splenic volumes on first imaging after Warshaw averaged 93.9% of preoperative size. Splenic volumes were preserved over time, as the most recent scans averaged 110.6% of the preoperative spleen volume. Collateral flow through the short gastric arteries, inferred from dilation on scans, increased in all patients. Median tumor volume was 85.2 mL, and all SPN were resected with negative margins. No relapse occurred (median follow up: 407 days). Median estimated blood loss was 100 mL, median length of procedure was 4.9 hours, and median inpatient length of stay was 3 days. A multimodal pain regimen, including preoperative TAP blocks, non-opiate, and opiate medications, resulted in a median 81 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MMEs) administered during the hospital stay.ConclusionLaparoscopic Warshaw for SPN in children appears highly effective at preserving splenic volume without compromising oncologic fidelity or consuming excess inpatient resources.

Comparison between pancreatoblastoma (PB) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) in pediatric patients with enhanced CT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether computed tomography features can differentiate pancreatoblastoma (PB) from solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPN) in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical and imaging data of 18 cases of PB and 61 cases of SPN confirmed by surgery or biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. All enrolled patients underwent 3 phases (non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases) of CT scanning. Qualitative CT analysis (location, margin, solid/cystic component proportion, calcification, hemorrhage, peritumoral vascularity, bile duct dilatation, pancreatic duct dilatation, pancreatic atrophy, vascular invasion, peripancreatic invasion, and distant metastases) and quantitative analysis (maximum tumor diameter, interface between tumor and parenchyma [delta], arterial enhancement ratio [AER], and portal enhancement ratio [PER]) were performed. The general CT morphologic features, age and tumor markers were compared also compared between the groups. Univariate analysis and the F test were conducted to identify features of PB. Then logistic Regression classifier was trained using the top five features with the highest F-value. Moreover, we used 5-fold cross-validation techniques for the validation of our model.

RESULTS

PB exhibited a significantly higher frequency of location in the body/tail, larger tumor size, poorly defined margins, calcification, peritumoral vascularity, pancreatic atrophy, and less hemorrhage. In addition, PB had higher AER, PER and lower delta relative to SPN (p < 0.05). PB presented a younger age and higher levels of AFP. Results of the F test indicated that AFP, AER, Age, calcification and pancreatic atrophy were the top five features included in the model that could differentiate pediatric PB from SPN. The combined model of CT and clinical features performed well in differentiating PB from SPN, with an AUC of 0.981 in the training cohort and 0.953 in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

AFP, AER, age, calcification and pancreatic atrophy are robust CT and clinical features for differentiating pediatric PB from SPN. A combination of qualitative and quantitative CT features may provide good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating PB from SPN in children.

Pancreatic masses in children: a single-center experience over two decades

Pancreatic masses are extremely rare in pediatric patients, with limited data available. This lack of data makes the diagnosis and management of these tumors in children extremely challenging. Therefore, we aimed to describe the presentations, clinical course, and outcomes of children with pancreatic tumors at our center. A retrospective analysis was performed of all pediatric patients diagnosed with pancreatic masses between 2003 and 2022 in an academic freestanding children's hospital. Data including demographics, clinical presentation, workup, management, and subsequent morbidity and mortality were collected and aggregated. Furthermore, we reviewed cases of pancreatic tumor resections in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program - Pediatric (NSQIP-P) database to identify common adverse outcomes and measures for quality improvement. In total, 17 patients were identified at our institution. Diagnoses included solid pseudopapillary (n = 9), gastrinoma (n = 1), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 2), pancreatoblastoma (n = 2), and insulinoma (n = 1). Two patients did not have a histopathologic diagnosis and were excluded from subsequent analysis. Overall, 12 patients underwent surgical intervention, with the most common procedures being pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, and all 12 were known to be alive at last contact. There were 3 deaths, all due to complications related to metastatic disease. Furthermore, 30-day postoperative outcomes in the NSQIP-P dataset for pancreatic surgeries in pediatric patients are excellent, with negligible morbidity and no mortalities after the index surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with pancreatic tumors amenable to surgical resection appear to have adequate long-term survival. Short-term outcomes at diagnosis are excellent and mainly appear to be influenced by the presence of metastatic disease at initial presentation.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Pancreatic masses are a rare entity in children with limited data on their presentation, management and surgical outcomes. • Solid Pseudopapillary tumors are one of the most common pancreatic tumors in children with a fair prognosis after surgical intervention.

WHAT IS NEW

• Surgical management of pediatric patients with pancreatic tumors is safe and effective in patients who do not have aggressive tumor types or metastatic disease. • Our case series provides a notable cohort of these pancreatic tumors with insight into the presentation, management and outcomes of five of these tumor types.

Massive extrapancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm misdiagnosed as hepatic tumor: a case report and literature review

Background

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas are uncommon, low-malignancy neoplasms. Moreover, the occurrence of extrapancreatic SPNs is rarely encountered.

Case summary

A 45-year-old female presented with a right upper abdominal mass and abdominal pain for 3 and 1 months as chief complaints, respectively. Initially, the patient was misdiagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma based on her symptoms and results of physical and imaging examinations. Following multidisciplinary discussion and ruling out surgical contraindications, a decision was taken to proceed with surgical intervention. Interestingly, the tumor was found to originate from the retroperitoneum and had invaded the right half of the liver and the right wall of the inferior vena cava. The operation was uneventful, and the pathological findings confirmed the tumor as an extrapancreatic SPN. The patient remained asymptomatic after 15 months of follow-up.

Conclusion

Surgical treatment remains the preferred option for extrapancreatic SPN. The preoperative misdiagnosis also highlights the importance of accurate diagnosis and the development of appropriate treatment strategies for liver masses.

Middle-Preserving Pancreatectomy for Multicentric Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm in a 10-Year-Old Female

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare low-grade malignant tumor of the pancreas that occurs predominantly in young females. This tumor is occasionally multicentric, posing a unique surgical conundrum for resection. We present a case of a 10-year-old female with a history of multicystic dysplastic left kidney and persistent urogenital sinus who was diagnosed with biopsy-proven multicentric SPN of the pancreatic head and tail and underwent middle-preserving pancreatectomy. The patient tolerated the surgery very well. Our case is one of the few reported cases of multicentric SPN in a pediatric patient, and the only case treated with middle-preserving pancreatectomy, which is a novel surgical option for protecting pediatric patients from total endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. With the increase in the incidence of SPN, there is an increasing need for pancreas-preserving surgical options, particularly in pediatric patients.

Solid Pseudopapillary Epithelial Neoplasm of the Pancreas in the Paediatric Population: A Report of Two Cases

A rare pathology, the solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm (SPEN) of the pancreas accounts for approximately 1% of pancreatic neoplasms. Initially called ‘Frantz’s tumour’, it has now been renamed to SPEN by the World Health Organization (WHO). This tumour has a predilection for females and a good prognosis with surgical excision being the treatment of choice.

Palpable abdominal masses in children are of significant clinical importance. Identifying cystic lesions in the pancreas from CT or MRI scans always warrant further investigations. Primary pancreatic neoplasms account for 0.1% of pancreatic tumours in the paediatric population; an extremely rare circumstance constituting a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to surgeons. This article comprises two paediatric cases of SPEN in 14- and 11-year-old females, respectively, and a literature review on current management.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas presenting after bicycle handlebar injury: diagnostic pitfalls in a young female-A case report

Introduction and importance

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of pancreas is a rare neoplasm with very low malignant potential. It mainly affects females in third decade of life and has favourable prognosis.

Case presentation

We report a case where a 17-years old girl presented with history of blunt abdominal trauma with handlebar of bicycle 6 months back, following which she developed abdominal pain and fullness in epigastrium. Keeping pancreatic pseudocyst as provisional diagnosis, she was investigated. The final diagnosis of SPN of pancreas came as a surprise.

The mass, about 6x5cm, was excised and Roux-en-Y distal pancreatico-jejunostomy was done.

Clinical discussion

Patient showed no recurrence or metastasis till one year of follow-up. This is the first case report of SPN presenting after handlebar injury.

Conclusion

Timely and adequate resection provides good long-term survival.

•

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of pancreas is a rare neoplasm with very low malignant potential and favourable prognosis.

•

It mainly affects females in third decade of life and constitutes 2% to 3% of all pancreatic neoplasms and 0.9% to 2.7% of all exocrine pancreatic neoplasms

•

Bicycle handlebar injury is the most common cause of pancreatic trauma in children and adolescents and rarely develops in to SPN.

•

Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for these tumours even in case of metastasis.

Laparoscopic Resection of Pediatric Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) of the pancreas arise rarely in children, are often large, and can associate intimately with splenic vessels. Splenic preservation is a fundamental consideration when resecting distal SPT. Occasionally, the main splenic vessels must be divided to resect the SPT with negative margins, but the spleen can be preserved if the short gastric vessels remain intact (ie, Warshaw procedure). The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of distal pancreatectomy (DP) for SPT in children and to highlight 2 cases of splenic preservation using the Warshaw procedure.

METHODS

Patients 19 years and younger who were treated at a single children's hospital between July 2004 and January 2021 were examined. Patient characteristics were collected from the electronic medical record. A pediatric radiologist calculated SPT and pre- and post-operative (ie, non-infarcted) splenic volumes.

RESULTS

Eleven patients received DP for SPT. Six DPs were performed open and 5 laparoscopically. The spleen was preserved in 3 open and 4 laparoscopic DPs. A laparoscopic Warshaw procedure was performed in 2 patients. Laparoscopic resection associated with less frequent epidural use (P = .015), shorter time to full diet (P = .030), and post-operative length of stay (P = .009), compared to open resection. Average residual splenic volume after the laparoscopic Warshaw procedure was 70% of preoperative volume.

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic DP for pediatric SPT achieved similar oncologic goals to open resection. Splenic preservation was feasible with laparoscopy in most cases and was successfully supplemented with the Warshaw procedure, which has not been previously reported for SPT resection in children.

Pseudopapillary solid tumour of the pancreas in paediatric age: description of a case report and review of the literature

Pseudopapillary solid tumour of the pancreas is a rare neoplasm that mainly affects young women in the second and third decade of life and less frequently children; originates from the exocrine component of the pancreas; and is characterized by slow growth, low potential for malignancy, and excellent prognosis following complete surgical resection. The tumour often presents as an asymptomatic abdominal mass that is accidentally detected during radiological investigations performed for other reasons. In this article, we report the clinical case of a 10-year-old girl who came to our observation for pain in the left hypochondrium, which had arisen for a week following a trauma; the imaging methods revealed a voluminous expansive pancreatic formation in the abdomen; on histological examination, the mass was a solid pseudopapillary tumour. Furthermore, we present a review of the literature aimed at highlighting the salient features of this neoplasm in paediatric age.

Solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm (SPEN) of the pancreas involving the distal body and proximal tail: A case report

•

Presentation, diagnosis and management of SPEN of the pancreas, a rare pancreatic tumor.

•

SPEN is more common in women and can be more locally invasive and aggressive in men.

•

Treatment involves surgical resection of the tumor and follow-up for recurrence.

•

It has an excellent prognosis following resection; hence early identification and treatment are essential.

Introduction and importance

Solid Pseudopapillary Epithelial Neoplasm (SPEN) of the pancreas is a rare cystic exocrine tumor of the pancreas most commonly occurring in women between 30 and 40 years of age. This case report aims to demonstrate the clinicopathological findings encountered and the management of a patient diagnosed with SPEN.

Case presentation

An 18-year-old woman with gradually progressive and intermittent abdominal pain in the epigastric region presented to our outpatient department. Physical examination elicited tenderness to palpation in the epigastric area, and imaging findings suggested SPEN of the pancreas involving distal body and proximal tail region of the pancreas. The tumor was resected, and the diagnosis was confirmed on histopathology examination.

Clinical discussion

SPEN is a slow-growing tumor with a low-grade malignant potential, found incidentally in asymptomatic patients and symptomatic patients present with abdominal pain. The average tumor size is about 4 to 6 cm in diameter. Imaging is essential for diagnosis, and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy was the most commonly reported procedure.

Conclusion

It is crucial to consider a diagnosis of SPEN in women with abdominal pain in the epigastric region as early surgical resection of the tumor results in resolution and excellent prognosis.

Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 29 cases of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas in patients under 20 years of age along with detailed review of literature

Background

Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms (SPNs) are rare low-grade malignant tumors with a marked preponderance for young females. Objective was to describe the morphology, differential diagnosis, and prognosis of SPNs in patients under 20 years of age and present a detailed review of literature.

Methods

A total of 29 cases in patients under 20 years of age reported as SPN during the period January 2014 to December 2019, were included in the study. These included 19 resection specimens, 4 incision biopsies and 6 cases received as blocks for second opinion. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides as well as immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides of all cases were retrieved and reviewed by the authors. TFE3 and Progesterone Receptor were performed retrospectively.

Results

Twenty-eight of the 29 patients were females. Ages of patients ranged from 12 to 19 years. Nineteen cases were resections. Tail was the commonest location. Mean tumor size was 9.5 cm. In 89.5% cases, tumor was confined to the pancreas. In 2 cases, distant metastasis was present. In 2 cases, extension beyond pancreas was seen. Solid and pseudopapillary areas were seen in all cases while other features were variable. Beta catenin and Cyclin D1 were positive in most cases while TFE3 was positive in 57% cases. Progesterone Receptor (PR) was positive in all 13 cases in which it was performed. Follow up was available in 14 patients. Follow up period ranged from 3 to 70 months. Twelve were alive and well without recurrence or metastasis while 2 were alive with recurrence and metastasis to liver and omentum respectively.

Conclusions

Although many studies on SPNs have been published, surgeons, oncologists and even pathologists in this part of the world are often not aware of these rare tumors leading to inaccuracies and delays in diagnosis. In addition, this paper focusses on the interesting observation that the majority of SPNs diagnosed in our department during study period occurred in patients under 20 years of age (29 versus 21 in patients over 20). However, clinico-epidemiological, morphologic and prognostic features were similar in both age groups. Possibility of SPNs should always be considered in case of pancreatic neoplasms occurring in patients under 20 years of age as well. We believe that this is a very interesting and helpful study for the clinicians as well as the pathologists.

Management of Cutaneous Calciphylaxis

Calciphylaxis is a deadly, painful disease with a 1-year mortality of up to 50%. The disease is commonly associated with patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), but it can manifest in non-uremic patients as well. In patients who are undergoing dialysis, the incidence of calciphylaxis can range from 0.04% to 4%. The progressive arterial calcification seen in calciphylaxis can affect multiple body organs, including the skin, brain, lungs, and muscle. In cutaneous calciphylaxis, painful and non-healing nodules, plaques, and ulcers may appear, increasing morbidity for patients. Diagnosis can be difficult, and the condition can clinically appear similar to other dermatological diseases, especially in non-uremic patients. Currently, skin biopsy with histological analysis is the most reliable method to help diagnose the condition. In certain cases, the use of medical imaging may be helpful. Treatment of pain in this condition can be difficult and should be multimodal and include wound care as well as modification of risk factors. Analgesic options include opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as well as analgesic options that are targeted for specific patients. There are currently multiple clinical trials underway that are studying targeted therapies for this condition.

Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm in male patients: systematic review with three new cases

Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (pSPN) is a rare exocrine neoplasm, which generally occurs in young women. This study analyses the clinical characteristics of pSPN in male patients through a systematic review of the literature, adding three new cases from our institution. We reviewed our experience in Pspns, and we performed a systematic review of pSPN of all articles published in English in PubMed and SCOPUS from 1980. Using the final included articles, we evaluated clinic-pathological features, surgical treatment and prognosis of male patients affected by pSPN. From the literature review and our cases, we collected 246 male patients with a proven pSPN. Mean age was 34.3 (range 4–78) years, with 26.2% patients younger than 18 years. Patients were asymptomatic in 35.9% of cases, despite a mean tumour size of 6.3 cm. In 63.7% of cases, the pSPN was located in the body–tail region. Distant metastases were reported at diagnosis in only 10 (4.1%) patients. A correct pre-operative diagnosis (including cytopathology) was provided in 53.6% of patients, with only 40 fine-needle aspiration/biopsy performed. Standard pancreatic resections represented 90.4% of surgical procedures. Beta-catenin and progesterone receptors were positive at immunostaining in 100% and 77.8% of cases, respectively. Fourteen (7.2%) patients relapsed after a mean disease-free survival of 43.1 months. After a mean follow-up of 47 (range 4–180) months, 89.5% of patients were alive and disease-free. Although rare, when dealing with a solid-cystic pancreatic mass, even in asymptomatic male patients, a pSPN should be considered as a possible diagnosis.

Differential diagnosis of pancreatoblastoma (PB) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) in children by CT and MR imaging

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether features on computed tomographic and/or magnetic resonance imaging can differentiate pancreatoblastoma (PB) from solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas in children.

METHODS

Clinical and imaging data for 20 cases of SPNs and 14 cases of PB confirmed by surgery or biopsy were retrospectively analysed. The size, border, calcification, haemorrhage, solid/cystic component proportion, intratumoural vessels, tumour capsulation, pancreatic duct dilatation, peripancreatic vessel invasion, distant metastasis status and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the two groups were examined, and key diagnostic features were identified. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test and Student's t test. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated when a single criterion was used.

RESULTS

Age ≤ 5 years, elevated serum α-fetoprotein (AFP), larger size, ill-defined border, calcification, absence of haemorrhage, intratumoural vessel, peripancreatic vessel invasion and distant metastasis differentiated PB from SPN (p < 0.05). ADC values of SPN were higher than those of PB (p = 0.001). There were no significant differences regarding tumour capsule (p = 0.435), pancreatic duct dilatation (p = 1.000) or cystic degeneration area over 50% of the tumour volume (p = 1.000) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The following features are helpful for differentiating PB from SPN: age ≤ 5 years, elevated serum AFP, larger size, ill-defined border, calcification, haemorrhage absence, intratumoural vessel, peripancreatic vessel invasion, distant metastasis and lower ADC value.

KEY POINTS

• CT and MRI are helpful to differentiate pancreatoblastoma (PB) from solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas in children. • The following features are helpful to differentiate PB from SPN: age ≤ 5 years, elevated serum AFP, larger size, ill-defined border, calcification, absence of haemorrhage, intratumoural vessel, peripancreatic vessel invasion, distant metastasis and lower ADC value.

Early Diagnosis of a Pediatric Pancreatic Tumor by Abdominal Physical Examination: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Detecting a neoplasm in pediatric patients with acute abdominal pain is difficult, especially when there is no palpable mass. Ihara's maneuver, which allows the physician to apply manual pressure directly on the pancreatic body, is a useful palpation method of diagnosing acute pancreatitis in children. We report a case of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPNP) detected by Ihara's maneuver.

CASE REPORT

An otherwise healthy, 15-year-old male visited our emergency department with acute abdominal pain and nausea. His vital signs were appropriate for his age. A physical examination denied peritoneal signs, but Ihara's maneuver induced strong tenderness. His serum amylase and lipase were normal. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan revealed a well-defined, 2.2-cm, nonenhanced mass in the pancreatic tail. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was performed, and the diagnosis of SPNP was confirmed. The patient was well postoperatively without any metastasis. SPNP is a rare neoplasm with low malignant potential. Although it typically occurs in young females, it has also been reported in children. The early diagnosis of SPNP is usually challenging because most patients do not have specific symptoms or laboratory findings. In the present case, the SPNP was difficult to detect by palpation because of its size, but Ihara's maneuver induced strong tenderness of the pancreas and led to a diagnosis. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Ihara's maneuver has the potential to enable early diagnosis not only of pancreatitis but also of pancreatic tumors, such as SPNP.

Surgical Resection of 78 Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors: a 30-Year Single Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) are rare, benign tumors of the pancreas that present as heterogeneous masses. We sought to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of surgical resected SPTs. Patients managed via initial surveillance were compared to those who underwent upfront resection.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained institutional database was used to identify patients who underwent surgical resection for a SPT between 1988 and 2018. Data on clinicopathological features and outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients underwent surgical resection for SPT during the study period. The mean age was 34.0 ± 14.6 years and a majority were female (N = 67, 85.9%) and white (N = 46, 58.9%). Thirty patients (37.9%) were diagnosed incidentally. Imaging-based presumed diagnosis was SPT in 49 patients (62.8%). A majority were located in the body or tail of the pancreas (N = 47, 60.3%), and 48 patients (61.5%) underwent a distal pancreatectomy. The median tumor size was 4.0 cm (IQR, 3.0-6.0), nodal disease was present in three patients (3.9%), and R0 resection was performed in all patients. No difference was observed in clinicopathological features and outcomes between patients who were initially managed via surveillance and those who underwent upfront resection. None of the patients under surveillance had nodal disease or metastasis at the time of resection; however, one of them developed recurrence of disease 95.1 months after resection. At a median follow-up of 36.1 months (IQR, 8.1-62.1), 77 (%) patients were alive and one patient (1.3%) had a recurrence of disease at 95.1 months after resection and subsequently died due to disease.

CONCLUSIONS

SPTs are rare pancreatic tumors that are diagnosed most frequently in young females. While a majority are benign and have an indolent course, malignant behavior has been observed. Surgical resection can result in exceptional outcomes.

Spontaneous rupture of solid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas: A case report and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPT) account for 1% to 3% of all pancreatic tumors. They have low malignant potential with a favorable prognosis, and predominantly occur in young women. The pathogenesis and clinical behavior of SPT are still uncertain. In addition, most ruptures of SPT were associated with blunt abdominal trauma, while spontaneous ruptures seemed to be quite rare. Up to now, there have been only 3 spontaneous ruptured SPT cases reported worldwide.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Here, we reported a 22-year-old female patient with left lower abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) showed that a hemorrhagic complex solid cystic mass located in the lesser omentum sac.

DIAGNOSIS

According to pathological findings of tumor specimen, the diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas was made.

INTERVENTIONS

Distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy was carried out.

OUTCOMES

The patient recovered to normal status within 10 days after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Besides, we reviewed about 50 cases in literatures to find out the clinical characteristics and differential diagnostic strategies of SPT.