Do Children and Adolescents With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Complete Clinical Disease Indices Similar to Physicians?

Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms among autistic individuals, with and without co-occurring intellectual disability

Gastrointestinal symptoms (GI) are very common among individuals on the autism spectrum. Prior research reports mixed findings regarding whether individuals with autism and co-occurring intellectual disability (ID) have elevated risk of gastrointestinal symptoms relative to individuals with autism alone. GI symptoms can be challenging to assess in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and/or ID given challenges with language, communication, and interoception. Prior research has tended to only include individuals with documented presence or absence of GI symptoms or conditions, that is, to exclude observations in which there is uncertainty regarding presence of GI symptoms. Therefore, none of the prior autism studies reported the association between ID and the certainty regarding presence or absence of GI symptoms. The objective of this study was to examine differences in parental certainty and odds of reporting gastrointestinal signs and symptoms among children on the autism spectrum, with and without intellectual disability. Participants were 308 children (36% ID) with a clinical diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (6-17 years). Parents endorsed whether their child had experienced or displayed a range of signs or symptoms related to GI problems in the past 3 months. Parents of autistic children with ID were less certain about the presence of more subjective symptoms, including abdominal pain, nausea, and bloating. Conversely, certainty regarding more objective signs (e.g., constipation, diarrhea, spitting up, etc.) was not significantly different. More accurate measures for GI signs/symptoms are needed for this population.

Nationwide experiences with trough levels, durability, and disease activity among inflammatory bowel disease patients following COVID-19 vaccination

Background

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has complicated the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines under different treatments in IBD patients and identify predictive factors associated with lower serological response, including anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drug levels.

Design

A prospective, double-center study of IBD patients was conducted following messenger ribonucleotide acid (mRNA) and non-mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Methods

Healthy control (HC) patients were enrolled to reduce bias. Baseline and control samples were obtained 14 days after the second dose to assess the impact of conventional and biological treatments. Clinical and biochemical activity, serological response level, and anti-TNF drug levels were measured.

Results

This study included 199 IBD (mean age, 40.9 ± 12.72 years) and 77 HC participants (mean age, 50.3 ± 12.36 years). Most patients (76.9%) and all HCs received mRNA vaccines. Half of the IBD patients were on biological treatment (anti-TNF 68.7%). Biological and thiopurine combined immunomodulation and biological treatment were associated with lower serological response (p < 0.001), and mRNA vaccination promoted better antibody levels (p < 0.001). Higher adalimumab levels caused lower serological response (p = 0.006). W8 persistence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 level was equal in IBD and HC groups. Vaccination did not aggravate clinical disease activity (p = 0.65).

Conclusion

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is considerably efficacious in IBD patients, with mRNA vaccines promoting better antibody levels. The negative impact of combined biological treatment, especially with high adalimumab drug levels, on serological response to vaccination should be considered. Although midterm durability of vaccination is encouraging, more data are needed to expand the existing understanding on this issue.

Agreement Level of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Symptom Reports between Children and Their Parents

Purpose

Children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently undergo clinical assessments, involving triadic communication between clinician, parent, and child. During such encounters parents are traditionally the main communicator of information on their child's IBD, including subjective symptom reports. The level of agreement between children and their parents for IBD symptoms is poorly understood, and this study aimed to examine this factor.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study among children with IBD, and one parent. A validated paediatric IBD symptom report tool (IBDnow) enabled children and their parent to rate seven pain, well-being, and stool metrics, with dyads completing the tool concurrently. Results were assessed using: Individual agreement: proportion of identical symptom reports by each dyad (ideal score >0.7); Category agreement: percentage of identical reports for IBDnow metrics for the cohort; Inter-rater reliability: Gwet's AC1 coefficient with higher scores indicating better reliability (maximum=1).

Results

Seventy-four parent/child dyads participated; child's mean age 12.2 years (standard deviation [SD] 2.9, range 6-16), mean time since diagnosis 2.8 years (SD 3), 54% female, 73% had Crohn's Disease. Mean individual agreement level was 0.6, with 27% of dyads agreeing on ≥6/7 IBDnow metrics. Category agreement was reported by 61% of dyads, 20% of parents overestimated, and 19% underestimated, their child's symptoms. Inter-rater reliability ranged from fair to good.

Conclusion

These results should improve clinician awareness of how IBD symptom reports from parents may introduce bias. Children should be considered the most important source of symptom reports, and tools such as IBDnow utilised to enhance communication.

Overview of Self-Management Skills and Associated Assessment Tools for Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Self-management is a multi-modal approach for managing chronic conditions that encompasses a number of different elements; knowledge, adherence, self-regulation, communication, and cognitive factors. Self-management has been shown to be beneficial for adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and for children with IBD it may help them learn to take control of their complex treatment regimens and lead to positive disease outcomes. The development of self-management skills for children with IBD is vital in order to maximize their potential for health autonomy, but it is still an emergent field in this population. This review provides an over-arching view of the self-management elements specific to children with IBD, and highlights outcome measures that may be used to assess skills within each field as well as the efficacy of targeted interventions.

Management of paediatric IBD after the peak of COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: A position paper on behalf of the SIGENP IBD working group

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, spreading in Italy during the first months of 2020, abruptly changed the way of practicing medicine in this country. As a consequence of the lockdown, the diagnostic and therapeutic management of paediatric chronic conditions, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been affected. During the peak of COVID-19 pandemic, elective visits, endoscopies and infusions have been postponed, with potential clinical and psychological impact on disease course and a high likelihood of increasing waiting lists. While slowly moving back towards normality, clinicians need to recognize the best ways to care for patients with IBD, carefully avoiding risk factors for new potential epidemic outbreaks. In this uncertain scenario until the development and spread of COVID-19 vaccine, it is necessary to continue to operate with caution. Hereby we provide useful indications for a safer and gradual restarting of routine clinical activities after COVID-19 peak in Italy.

An Overview of Tools to Score Severity in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background and Aims: The management of IBD entails the use of various treatments (nutrition, medications, and surgery) in order to induce and maintain remission. The assessment of IBD disease activity is based on a combination of symptoms, clinical findings, imaging, and endoscopic procedures. As in any disease, reliable assessment of disease activity or severity is required in order to plan relevant follow-up, decide on appropriate investigations, determine the best treatment option and subsequently assess response to treatment. It is important for proper documentation, follow-up, assessment of response to treatment and communication, especially in patients with IBD, to talk the same language by using validated and widely used scores for disease activity, endoscopic and radiologic activity, and patient reported outcomes both for clinical practice and research. This review aims to highlight key tools available for the assessment of disease activity or severity in individuals (especially children) with IBD. Methods: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Pubmed, and the Cochrane Library with the last search date of August 2020. Tools evaluating disease severity across various aspects (clinical, endoscopic, and radiological) were identified and discussed. Those tools validated and specific for children with IBD were included were available. Results: Over time a number of scoring systems have been developed to quantify clinical, endoscopic and imaging assessments in individuals with IBD. While some are exclusively for children or adults, others appear to have relevance to all age groups. In addition, some tools developed in adult populations are utilized in children, but have not expressly been validated in this age group. Conclusions: Although some available scoring tools are appropriate for children with IBD, others require consideration. The development and use of pediatric-specific tools is relevant and appropriate to optimal care of children and adolescents with IBD.

Parent IMPACT-III: Development and Validation of an Inflammatory Bowel Disease-specific Health-related Quality-of-life Measure

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to validate the parent-proxy IMPACT-III (IMPACT-III-P) in a sample of youth diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Parent-proxy report measures are standard for pediatric psychosocial assessment, and the IMPACT-III-P will provide a more comprehensive representation of HRQOL. Reliability and validity analyses were conducted.

METHODS

Parents (N = 50) of youth 8 to 17 years with IBD reported on their child's HRQOL (IMPACT-III-P and PedsQL-4.0) and depression (BASC-2); youth reported on their HRQOL (child IMPACT-III), pain interference (PROMIS Pain Interference), and disease symptoms; and physicians completed measures of disease activity.

RESULTS

Criterion validity was established as the IMPACT-III-P was strongly, positively associated with the PedsQL (r = 0.59, P < 0.001). Convergent validity was supported as higher IMPACT-III-P scores were associated with less pain interference (r = -0.41, P < 0.01) and lower depression (r = -0.41, P < 0.01). Discriminant validity was partially supported, as higher IMPACT-III-P scores were associated with lower child-reported symptoms (r = -0.41, P < 0.01), but scores did not differ based on inactive, mild, or moderate/severe disease activity groups as rated by physicians. Internal consistency, parent-child agreement, and item-level analyses revealed strong reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

The IMPACT-III-P demonstrated strong validity and reliability. Parents and children had similar reports of HRQOL, with parents rating child HRQOL slightly lower. Findings support the use of the IMPACT-III-P for youth 8 to 17 years old to use in accordance with the child IMPACT-III to provide valuable information regarding HRQOL in youth with IBD.

A Symptom Self-report Tool for Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBDnow)

OBJECTIVES

Clinical symptom evaluation for children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is typically done using composite tools: the Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) and Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI). Both rely on clinician interpretation of child or parent symptom recall. No universal self-report tool has yet been developed for children with IBD to assess and report their symptoms. The research objective was to develop a self-report tool that produced information congruent with that obtained by clinicians using the PUCAI or PCDAI.

METHODS

A children's symptom self-report tool (IBDnow) was developed with picture and text Likert symptom scales. The clinician and child completed their reports during the same outpatient consultation. Agreement levels were calculated at the individual level (identical child and clinician answers), category level (symptom severity), and aggregate level (cohort scores). Internal consistency was measured with Cronbach alpha.

RESULTS

One hundred children from Christchurch (New Zealand) (n = 65), and Sydney (Australia) (n = 35) completed the study (Crohn's Disease (CD):88, ulcerative colitis (UC):12), mean age 13.9 years (±3.6). Mean individual agreement was 0.76 (±0.19). Category severity had very good or good inter-rater reliability for 5 of the 7 symptom scales and overall severity agreement of 76%. Aggregate mean scores were significantly different between clinicians (14.9, ±18.8), and participants (21.6, ±19.4), (P <0.005, confidence interval -9.0, -4.4), but 60 pairs had scores within a 10% margin. Cronbach alpha was 0.74.

CONCLUSIONS

This self-report tool had good proportionate agreement between raters, and good crude agreement for symptom categories. Assigning PUCAI or PCDAI scores caused inter-rater discrepancies to be misleadingly magnified. Pediatric gastroenterologists may consider utilizing IBDnow to elicit symptom self-reports from children with IBD to enable them to communicate meaningful information on their ongoing symptom burden. This would be a positive step in helping children feel included in clinical encounters and promoting self-management, at the same time producing valid, subjective symptom recall.