Clinical and Imaging Predictors of Surgical Splenorenal Shunt Dysfunction in Pediatric Patients

Balloon angioplasty versus stent placement for the treatment of portal vein stenosis in children: a single center experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous interventional treatment of portal vein stenosis in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all interventional treatments for portal vein stenosis in pediatric patients at a single institution from 2010 to 2021 was conducted. Platelet count, spleen size and portal vein flow velocity were assessed during the follow-up period. Primary and primary assisted patency time were determined.

RESULTS

A total of ten children (median age 28.5 months, interquartile range (IQR): 2.75-52.5 months) with portal vein stenosis after Mesorex-Shunt (n = 4), liver transplantation (n = 3) and other etiologies (n = 3) underwent 15 interventional procedures. There were five reinterventions and one discontinued intervention. The technical success rate was 93.3% (14/15) and clinical success of treated patients was 100% (14/14). Median follow-up was 18 months (IQR: 13.5-81 months). The median primary patency time for stent placement was 70 months (IQR: 13.5-127.25 months). For balloon angioplasty, the median primary patency time was 9 months (IQR 7.25-11.5 months), while the median assisted primary patency time was 14 months (IQR: 12 to 15 months). Platelet count, spleen size and portal vein flow velocity reliably corresponded to recurrence of portal vein stenosis in asymptomatic patients during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Interventional treatment is a safe and efficient method to treat portal vein stenosis with long patency times, regardless of etiology. Primary stent placement shows a higher primary patency time than balloon angioplasty. Implementation of stent placement as the primary interventional method may improve patency times and reduce the need for repeat reinterventions in pediatric patients.

Pediatric Hepatobiliary Interventions in the Setting of Intrahepatic Vascular Malformations, Portal Hypertension, and Liver Transplant

Within the broad spectrum of pediatric hepatobiliary disorders, hepatic vascular malformations, portal hypertension, and hepatic transplant interventions pose numerous challenges. The role of interventional radiology within each of these conditions is discussed herein, beginning with endovascular management of high flow hepatic vascular malformations. Next, while becoming less common in adult populations, surgical portoportal and portosystemic shunts remain prevalent in many pediatric centers. Shunt anatomy is reviewed along with endovascular management techniques for shunt dysfunction. Next, the growing experience with pediatric transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement is reviewed along with tips for success in pediatric patients. Finally, pediatric hepatic transplant interventions are discussed with technical notes pertinent to split liver anatomy.

Endovascular treatment of surgical mesoportal and portosystemic shunt dysfunction in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Published data describing the endovascular treatment of dysfunctional mesoportal and portosystemic shunts in the pediatric population are limited.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to describe the treatment and follow-up of such shunts managed by interventional radiology at a single pediatric hospital. We hypothesized that stenotic and occluded pediatric portosystemic and mesoportal shunts can be maintained patent by interventional radiology in the moderate term.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study at a tertiary pediatric hospital. We included children with surgical mesoportal (meso-Rex) or portosystemic (mesocaval, splenorenal or splenocaval) shunts treated with attempted angioplasty or stenting from 2010 to 2018. Technical success was defined as catheterization and intervention upon the shunt with venographic evidence of flow improvement. The primary outcome variables were shunt patency at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-procedure and freedom from reintervention.

RESULTS

Twenty pediatric patients (11 boys, 9 girls; mean age 8.25 years, range 1.3-17 years) met inclusion criteria. Fifty-two interventions (primary and reintervention) on 13 splenorenal, 3 meso-Rex, 2 mesocaval and 2 splenocaval shunts were performed because of evidence of shunt failure, including gastrointestinal bleeding, hypersplenism, or radiographic evidence of a flow defect. The 11 stenotic shunts were treated with 100% technical success, while the remaining 9 occluded shunts were treated with 66.7% technical success. The mean number of reinterventions was 1.9 (standard deviation [SD] = 3.1) per child, which did not differ between stenotic and occluded shunts (P=0.24). Primary patency at 1-month, 6-month, 12-month and 24-months follow-up visits was 17/17 (100%), 10/16 (62.5%), 7/15 (46.7%) and 4/10 (40%), respectively. However, 100% of shunts were either primary patent or primary-assisted patent by endovascular reintervention. There were no cases of shunt occlusion following initial technical success. Finally, the median freedom from reintervention duration was 387 days (SD=821 days).

CONCLUSION

Dysfunctional portosystemic surgical shunts are effectively managed by endovascular methods. While many shunts require reintervention, combined primary patency and assisted primary patency rates are excellent.