Viscosity of Commercial Food-based Formulas and Home-prepared Blenderized Feeds

Blenderized tube feeding in pediatrics - current evidence, guidelines, and considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recently, blenderized tube feeding (BTF) consisting of blended whole food components is emerging as a preferred approach to enteral nutrition in pediatric patients. Differences in the nutritional profile, viscosity, and other characteristics between BTF and conventional tube feeding formulas may impact clinical outcomes and practice considerations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing guidance and evidence are emerging for BTF in pediatric populations requiring tube feeding. The characteristics of each BTF formulation vary, which may affect patient tolerance and clinical outcome.

SUMMARY

BTF is safe and generally well tolerated in children. It is shown to improve symptoms, clinical outcomes, and quality of life for many patients. A thorough risk assessment and nuanced approach may be required to optimize BTF administration.

Blenderized tube feedings: Practice recommendations from the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Prior to the 1970s, blending food and liquids and putting them through an enteral access device (EAD) was the most common form of enteral nutrition (EN). However, in the 1970s, blenderized tube feedings (BTFs) became less popular due to the emergence of modern commercial enteral formulas (CEFs). Recently, a cultural shift toward consuming a natural diet, consisting of whole foods, has led to a resurgence in the use of BTF. The increasing use of BTF in a variety of patient care settings identifies a need for practice recommendations that provide guidance for nutrition professionals and patients. Members of the American Society for Parental and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Enteral Nutrition Committee identified salient clinical questions concerning BTF, conducted a comprehensive literature search, and subsequently developed practice recommendations pertaining to the use of BTF. This paper was approved by the ASPEN 2022-2023 Board of Directors.

Blended diet for enteral tube feeding in young people: A systematic review of the benefits and complications

BACKGROUND

Interest and use of blended diets (BD) for young people who are tube fed has significantly increased in the last decade, driven primarily by the desires of motivated caregivers. This review identified, appraised and synthesised the available evidence on the benefits and complications of BD versus commercial feeds.

METHODS

A systematic review following PRISMA guidance and registered with PROSPERO was conducted across PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Cochrane up to August 2022.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

English language studies including (1) children, (2) original research (interventional and observational) and (3) examination of BD outcomes. Exclusion criteria were (1) unoriginal research or case reports, (2) focus on feeding management, preparations or attitudes and (3) comparing commercial blends only. Data were synthesised using an established narrative synthesis approach using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and six database results were identified and 61 were sought for retrieval. A full-text article review revealed seven eligible studies, involving 267 participants (age range 9 months to 26 years). Studies reported differences in gastrointestinal symptoms (n = 222), medication use (n = 119), growth (n = 189) and complications or adverse events (n = 91). The results indicate positive outcomes, particularly in gastrointestinal symptom control, with few reports of mild adverse events in the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of data in this area and much heterogeneity in the included studies, but the available literature points towards positive outcomes. This is an important and highly relevant topic, and more primary research, ideally using standardised reporting, is required to answer the key questions.

Effect of blenderized tube feeds on gastric emptying: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Blenderized tube feeds (blends) are associated with lower hospital admissions and reduced gastroesophageal symptoms, but their high viscosity may theoretically prolong gastric emptying. Our objective was to compare differences in gastric emptying with blends vs with formula.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified individuals 6 months to 20 years with enteral tubes who underwent 1-h liquid gastric emptying scintigraphy from 1998 to 2020 at Boston Children's Hospital. Examinations were excluded if a postpyloric tube was present, tracer was administered orally or with diet differing from habitual, habitual diet was indeterminable, imaging was terminated early, or >50% of input counts emptied during bolus administration. Emptying was classified as delayed if gastric residual at 1 h was ≥60% of ingested dose.

RESULTS

Eighteen examinations (15 individuals) were performed with blends and 35 examinations (32 individuals) with formula. Although percentage of residual at 1 h was significantly higher in patients receiving blends compared with formula (54 ± 17 vs 40 ± 25, P = 0.04), the number of patients with delayed gastric emptying did not differ (39% vs 29%, respectively, P = 0.54). Type of diet, feed volume or concurrent medications did not predict delayed gastric emptying. Children with blends received higher bolus volumes (106 ± 55 vs 66 ± 59 ml; P = 0.02), and this significantly predicted percentage of residual (β = 0.14; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of patients with delayed gastric emptying was similar in children receiving blends and formula. Although the mean percentage of gastric residual was higher with blends, this may be explained by higher bolus volumes administered. This preliminary work suggests that blends compare favorably to formula.

Pediatric formulas: Categories, composition, and considerations

Formulas, liquid nutrition, may be consumed orally or via a feeding tube to provide partial or complete nutrition that a given individual could not obtain using natural food stuffs in their native form. A wide range of commercially available formulas exist, which may be used as sole-source nutrition or in conjunction with other foods. Physicians and dietitians must understand the nature of and indications for specific formulas to treat diseases, provide complete nutrition to patients, and avoid harm. Products vary in macronutrient and micronutrient content and calorie concentration among many other factors. They are formulated specifically for patients of specific ages, correlating to nutritional needs and medical diagnoses. Additionally, formula availability, insurance coverage, mode of consumption, physiologic tolerance, and caregiver preference influence formula selection. Caregivers may also make their own pediatric formulas. We review commercial and homemade pediatric formulas.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Treatment in Infancy Through Young Adulthood

Gastroesophageal reflux treatment varies greatly across the pediatric age spectrum. Infant reflux treatments rely heavily on nutritional interventions, whereas reflux in older children is treated more commonly with medications. However, because of the broad differential diagnosis, treatment nonresponse merits a re-evaluation of the diagnosis being treated and additional testing to provide a more precision-medicine approach to care.

Nutrition and preparation of blenderized tube feeding in children and adolescents with neurological impairment: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

The use of homemade tube feeding formula has become increasingly popular for children requiring enteral nutrition. This project aimed to investigate nutrition and preparation of blenderized tube feeding in the field of children and adolescents with neurological impairment.

METHODS

A scoping review was performed using established methodologies. In January 2021, we searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Complete, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and gray literature to identify relevant articles.

MAJOR FINDINGS

Twenty-two papers were included describing the composition of food items, preparation procedures, and food safety. No randomized controlled trials and only a few prospective studies were included. A broad variety of food items from all food groups and many examples of recipes were presented. Most recipes provided 1.0 kcal/ml but tended to contain less energy and nutrients than expected, which could be due to preparation issues, such as sieving and the high viscosity of the blend. Preparation requires a commercial-grade household blender and diligence to ensure thorough household hygiene for adequate food safety.

CONCLUSIONS

This review revealed practical experience in the nutrition and preparation aspects of blenderized tube feeding but minimal empirical evidence. Multiple examples of the composition of food items and preparation procedures for blenderized tube feeding were found, but uncertainty regarding the ideal composition or preparation was also exposed. The future of blenderized tube feeding would benefit from clinically tested recipes that include an evaluation of nutrients, viscosity, and microbial contamination, as well as the effect of the food's appearance and scent on the target group.

Stir, Shake or Blend: A Comparison of Methods Used to Reduce Viscosity of Blenderized Tube Feedings

Blenderized tube feeding (BTF) refers to formula composed of whole foods and purees, blended to a consistency that can be administered through an enteral feeding device. BTFs have a higher viscosity than conventional enteral formulas and may be mixed with extra liquid to aid in administration via an enteral feeding device. This study compared changes in viscosity of commercially available BTF s when stirred, shaken, or blenderized. The International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative flow test was used to provide an objective level of viscosity. Our results indicate that the method chosen to thin BTFs results in significant differences in viscosity and varies depending on the percent of water by volume added to the formula as well as the presence of additional non-food ingredients such as synthetic supplements. We conclude that the method used to thin BTFs should be taken into account when a consistent viscosity level is desired.

Blenderized enteral nutrition in pediatric short gut syndrome: Tolerance and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Blenderized feeds consisting of whole food components are emerging as a preferred approach to enteral nutrition. However, there is limited evidence-based guidance for this strategy in short bowel syndrome (SBS). We aimed to explore the tolerance and clinical outcome of blenderized feeds in patients with SBS.

METHOD

We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of blenderized feeds in pediatric SBS. Of the 376 patients screened, 58 met inclusion criteria. Three patients were excluded because of a history of bowel transplant. Demographics, clinical history, and nutrition history were collected and analyzed.

RESULT

Patients had improved diarrhea though worsening gas while receiving blenderized feeds. There was no significant difference in small bowel length in patients who discontinued blends compared with those who continued. However, patients with colonic resection were more likely to discontinue the blends. In a subgroup of patients who lost weight despite improved diarrhea (n = 19), most had a history of ileocecal valve (ICV) and colonic resection, but no difference in small bowel length compared with those who did not lose weight.

CONCLUSION

Our cohort of patients with SBS experienced improved gastrointestinal symptoms and stool quality on blenderized feeds. Patients without an ICV and with colonic resection were more prone to weight loss. Stepwise titration of blenderized formula with previous formula regimen may be needed in a subset of patients to optimize tolerance and weight gain. Further study is warranted to understand factors contributing to variable tolerance and weight gain on blenderized formulas to guide their use in patients with SBS.

Instrumental and sensory techniques to characterize the texture of foods suitable for dysphagic people: A systematic review

The interest to characterize texture-modified foods (TMFs) intended for people with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) has grown significantly since 2011. Several instrumental and sensory techniques have been applied in the analysis of these foods. The objective of the present systematic review was to identify the most appropriate techniques, especially for the food industry and clinical setting. The search was carried out in three online databases according to the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA). Across the multiple trials reviewed, Texture Profile Analysis and the Uniaxial Compression Test were most used as the instrumental technique for solid foods, and the Back Extrusion Test for fluid and semisolid foods. All trials used descriptive analysis as the sensory technique. However, the experimental conditions of the trials lacked standardization. Consequently, the results of the trials were not comparable. To properly characterize the texture of TMFs intended for OD by each technique, an international consensus is needed to establish standardized experimental conditions. Methods based on these techniques should also be validated by collaborative studies to verify repeatability, replicability, and reproducibility.

Effect of Added Free Water to Enteral Tube Feeds in Children Receiving Commercial Blends

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of free water administration on clinical outcomes in medically complex patients, based on the hypothesis that patients receiving more thin liquids have worse outcomes related to increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of children initiated on commercial blenderized tube feedings from 2010 to 2019. The percentage of gastrostomy intake that was a thin liquid was determined, with thin liquids including free water or thin formula based on the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) framework. Patients were categorized into those receiving low volumes of thin liquids ("percent thin" ≤20%) and those receiving higher volumes ("percent thin" >20%). Emergency room visits, hospital admissions, and chest X-rays during the year after starting the blend were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients age 12 months to 18.7 years (median 3.7 years) were included. Twenty patients (44%) were receiving a blend with an IDDSI-categorized thin consistency and 25 patients (56%) were receiving a thicker blend. In addition to the blend, patients received a median of 320 mL per day of water (range 0-1000 mL). Patients receiving <20% thin liquids were less likely to undergo chest X-rays during follow-up than patients receiving larger amounts of thin liquids (10% in the minimal thin group versus 48% in the greater thin group, P = 0.03). In a multivariable logistic regression, this relationship remained significant after controlling for underlying pulmonary disease, aspiration, method of feed administration (bolus or continuous feeds), fundoplication status, and oral intake status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that patients on blenderized tube feeds receive widely variable amounts of added thin liquids, like water. The addition of water to tube feeds, while typically given for hydration, can modify feed viscosity and clinical outcomes, such as chest X-ray performance.

Blenderized formulations in home enteral nutrition: a narrative review about challenges in nutritional security and food safety

Blenderized formulations (BFs) are prepared by homogenization of food that is normally used in oral nutrition. BFs are mainly used in home enteral nutrition (HEN), although their use has also been reported by hospitals when commercial enteral formulas are not available. HEN is applied when the patient has been discharged from the hospital. This nutritional therapy promotes the patient's reintegration into the family nucleus and promotes humanized care, and decreases treatment costs. However, the patient should continue to receive health and nutritional care, ranging from periodic nutritional re-evaluation to adaptation of the dietary plan. HEN provides the patient a greater contact with the family, whereas BFs promote the adaptation of the diet with food, respecting the food diversity and culture, lower cost, and easier access to food. Disadvantages of BFs include more time spent by the professional to calculate the dietary plan, greater difficulty in adjusting daily needs, and less microbiological and chemical stability. In this review, the nutritional, food security, and safety aspects of BF used in HEN are discussed. Technological quality aspects that are essential knowledge in the preparation of the patient's dietary plan also are presented.

Unexpected Poor Growth in Pediatric Patients on Food-based Enteral Therapy: Case Series and Suggested Practice Changes

INTRODUCTION

Enteral feeding pumps at times may deliver different volumes than are prescribed, which can negatively impact growth, nutrition, and well-being. This study sought to assess whether challenges with pump accuracy for patients on food-based formulas contributed to challenges with weight gain.

METHODS

Chart review identified complex feeding patients receiving food-based enteral nutrition via feeding pump with unexpected weight loss. Relevant data, such as enteral formula type, and anthropometric information were extracted.

RESULTS

Five complex pediatric feeding patients were identified and 2 of these cases were summarized as representative examples, showing weight loss in children following the introduction of enteral food-based formulas because of feeding pump inaccuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Complex pediatric feeding patients may display unexpected and poor weight gain and growth while receiving food-based enteral feeding interventions because of pump errors. It is vital for providers to be aware of these challenges for timely intervention.

Exploring Clinical Outcomes and Feasibility of Blended Tube Feeds in Children

Commercially produced complete nutritional formulas (CFs) are commonly delivered to children requiring enteral nutrition via gastrostomy. However, a cultural shift toward consuming a more natural diet consisting of whole foods has caused the use of blenderized tube feeds (BTFs) to grow in popularity among parents and carers in recent years. There are advantages and disadvantages of both BTF and CF use. There is evidence that suggests that BTFs can significantly improve tube-feeding tolerance and reduce gastrointestinal symptoms associated with tube feeding, such as gagging, retching, and constipation, thereby resulting in an improved quality of life (QoL) for enterally fed children and their caregivers. BTFs have also been implicated in increasing the diversity of the gut microbiota in enterally fed children. However, concerns have been raised that BTFs may be inferior to CFs in energy and nutrition sufficiency. Issues such as microbial contamination, tube blockages, and difficulties in preparation and administration may also complicate the use of BTFs. Additionally, like CFs, BTFs can vary significantly in nutrition composition, and dietitian involvement with BTF use is crucial. The current literature on the clinical outcomes of BTF use is limited, and further research is needed before recommendations can be made on BTF use in children. A literature review was conducted to compare clinical outcomes between BTFs and CFs and evaluate the feasibility of BTF use in children.

Is IDDSI an Evidence-Based Framework? A Relevant Question for the Frail Older Population

To delay impacts of aging, optimal nutritional status is essential. Several factors can reduce food intake, such as isolation, income, and cognitive/physical decline. Additionally, chewing and swallowing difficulties, or dysphagia, often disrupt the ability to consume life-long favorite dishes. Food and liquids could require modification of texture or consistency to ensure a comfortable or safe swallow. The food industry, foodservices facilities, and caregivers need quality control benchmarks to provide adequate nourishment and meet these new feeding challenges. The International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) is proposing the IDDSI framework and testing methods to describe food used in nutritional care plans to circumvent dysphagia and improve communication among caregivers. This systematic review assesses the validity and reliability of the IDDSI testing methods using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). Two publications presented content validity whereas 19 publications looked at construct validity or reliability for the IDDSI testing methods. One study was conducted in older adults presenting dysphagia. This review concludes that there is insufficient evidence to recommend the IDDSI testing methods. Further research, conducted with robust methodological design and reporting, is needed to develop and assess nutritious adapted food for frail older populations.